Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A new build of Struts 1.3.5, including checksums and signatures, is available to evaluate for release quality. [RESULT] This vote for Struts 1.3.5 quality resulted in: Binding votes from PMC members: GA: Don Brown, James Mitchell Beta: Wendy Smoak, James Holmes Non-binding votes: GA: Anders Steinlein, Paul Benedict Struts 1.3.5 can therefore be released as Beta quality. I'll work on getting the distribution out onto the mirrors and ibiblio today, and post the announcement to user@ once everything is in place. -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
Wendy, I think there may be a mistake. I am a committer now :-) At least I thought I was ::scratches head::. Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak wrote: A new build of Struts 1.3.5, including checksums and signatures, is available to evaluate for release quality. [RESULT] This vote for Struts 1.3.5 quality resulted in: Binding votes from PMC members: GA: Don Brown, James Mitchell Beta: Wendy Smoak, James Holmes Non-binding votes: GA: Anders Steinlein, Paul Benedict Struts 1.3.5 can therefore be released as Beta quality. I'll work on getting the distribution out onto the mirrors and ibiblio today, and post the announcement to user@ once everything is in place. -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Do you Yahoo!? Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
On 8/16/06, Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wendy, I think there may be a mistake. I am a committer now :-) At least I thought I was ::scratches head::. It's the PMC votes that are binding. In the normal course, we usually invite a committer to join the PMC after six months or so. * http://struts.apache.org/bylaws.html -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
Thanks Ted. I understand better now. I still think 1.3.5 is great! Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/16/06, Paul Benedict wrote: Wendy, I think there may be a mistake. I am a committer now :-) At least I thought I was ::scratches head::. It's the PMC votes that are binding. In the normal course, we usually invite a committer to join the PMC after six months or so. * http://struts.apache.org/bylaws.html -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
RE: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
I have successfully converted over a very large application to Struts 1.3.5. The backwards compatibility is amazing, and I also had no problems using the old request processor. Really, I am impressed and didn't expect it to go this smooth, and I just want to say congratulations and good job for everyone who worked on it for the last 18 months. Because of the success I had, I am giving it a +1 for GA quality. I believe it is good enough for people to build and upgrade production applications with it. Paul - Do you Yahoo!? Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
+1 GA -- Looks great!!! -- James Mitchell 678.910.8017 On Aug 6, 2006, at 12:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: A new build of Struts 1.3.5, including checksums and signatures, is available to evaluate for release quality. * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.5/ It has also been deployed to m2-snapshot-repository with signatures for the jars and poms. The release plan is available on the wiki: * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease135 The original vote thread can be viewed here: * http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg23710.html Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond with a vote on its quality: [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) While only votes from Struts PMC members are binding, all community members are encouraged to evaluate and provide feedback on this build. -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
On 8/11/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 GA -- Looks great!!! LOL. No fair voting twice, James :) As it stands, we have two beta and two GA. Remember, everyone who has tested the distribution is invited to vote, binding or not. -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
Doh! I couldn't remember if I had sent that in. -- James Mitchell 678.910.8017 On Aug 11, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Ted Husted wrote: On 8/11/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 GA -- Looks great!!! LOL. No fair voting twice, James :) As it stands, we have two beta and two GA. Remember, everyone who has tested the distribution is invited to vote, binding or not. -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
+1 GA non-binding. Been using 1.3.5 successfully in my app. \Anders -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Husted Sent: 11. august 2006 15:07 To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote) On 8/11/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 GA -- Looks great!!! LOL. No fair voting twice, James :) As it stands, we have two beta and two GA. Remember, everyone who has tested the distribution is invited to vote, binding or not. -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
+1 Beta -Original Message- From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 3:48 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote) On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond with a vote on its quality: [ ] Alpha [X] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) Same reasons as before. :) * http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg23828.html This build is working fine in my test environment, and will go into production the next time I do an update. -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond with a vote on its quality: [ ] Alpha [X] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) Same reasons as before. :) * http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg23828.html This build is working fine in my test environment, and will go into production the next time I do an update. -- Wendy Smoak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
+1 for GA Don Wendy Smoak wrote: On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond with a vote on its quality: [ ] Alpha [X] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) Same reasons as before. :) * http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg23828.html This build is working fine in my test environment, and will go into production the next time I do an update. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.5 Quality (re-vote)
Finally had a chance to go through this. +1 for GA -- James Mitchell 678.910.8017 On Aug 7, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Don Brown wrote: +1 for GA Don Wendy Smoak wrote: On 8/5/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond with a vote on its quality: [ ] Alpha [X] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) Same reasons as before. :) * http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg23828.html This build is working fine in my test environment, and will go into production the next time I do an update. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
