Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release
Ran Sqlg's own test suite and TinkerPop's structured and process test suites on Sqlg. No failures. VOTE: +1 Thanks Pieter On 11/02/2017 14:49, Robert Dale wrote: > website passes linkchecker. my app passes all tests. > VOTE +1 > > > Robert Dale > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Stephen Mallette > wrote: > >> i think it's on schedule still. pieter sounded like he needed a little >> extra time, but given the nature of the issue he described it didn't seem >> like that would ultimately turn up something run afoul in the TinkerPop >> side of things, so my personal inclination would be to close vote when >> posted and release. on the other hand, the vote closes on a saturday, which >> means that unless jason intends to do release work on the weekend, there's >> not much point to closing the vote on saturday and pieter can have some >> extra time. Anyway, I'll leave that up to Jason to coordinate with Ted as >> we traditionally release all our lines of code at once. Once they do close >> vote and release the artifacts, it will take up to 24 hours for apache >> infrastructure to sync the releases to all the mirrors, so everything is >> usually available the day after the vote closes. >> >> as for voting, every vote counts - though PMC votes are the ones that are >> technically "binding" for purpose of a release (in apache terms we need a >> "majority approval"[1] to put the release out the door). Now, if any vote, >> non-binding or binding came in as -1, we would take that fairly seriously, >> discuss it and depending on circumstances could scrap/delay the release. >> Testing releases and voting is an excellent and easy way to contribute to >> TinkerPop. >> >> [1] http://apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Paul A. Jackson >> wrote: >> >>> I'm looking for some insight for when 3.2.4 will release. It looks like >>> voting closes tomorrow. Is that on schedule, and if so what's a typical >> ETA >>> for binaries to be posted? >>> >>> I don't know if my vote counts, but FTW! >>> >>> VOTE: +1 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Paul >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 7:03 AM >>> To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release >>> >>> validate-distribution.sh was good for me - thanks for doing all the work >>> on this one Jason. nice job >>> >>> VOTE: +1 >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote: >>> >>>> Release and docs looks good to me. >>>> >>>> Validating source distribution >>>> >>>> * downloading Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 (apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src. >> zip)... >>>> OK >>>> * validating signatures and checksums ... >>>> * PGP signature ... OK >>>> * MD5 checksum ... OK >>>> * SHA1 checksum ... OK >>>> * unzipping Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 ... OK >>>> * building project ... OK >>>> >>>> >>>> VOTE: +1 >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ted >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:32 PM, pieter-gmail >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ok, however I did test on the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT immediately after >>>>> Jason's email on the 2/2/2017 and those changes were not there. >>>>> They are there now but there was a SNAPSHOT release on the >>>>> 08/02/2017 so things changed. >>>>> Anyhow that might just be some SNAPSHOT confusion thing. >>>>> >>>>> Next time I'll pull the code and build it manually to make sure. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Pieter >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 09/02/2017 22:27, Marko Rodriguez wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>>> The significant change is >>>>>>> ffe1b4c Marko A. Rodriguez on 2016/11/15 >>>>>>> at >>>>> 12:44 AM >>>>>> Ah yea. Thats different from what I thought you had issue with — >>>>> has-containers and arrays/collections handling. >>>>>>> I don't have a problem with the changes just that
Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release
website passes linkchecker. my app passes all tests. VOTE +1 Robert Dale On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > i think it's on schedule still. pieter sounded like he needed a little > extra time, but given the nature of the issue he described it didn't seem > like that would ultimately turn up something run afoul in the TinkerPop > side of things, so my personal inclination would be to close vote when > posted and release. on the other hand, the vote closes on a saturday, which > means that unless jason intends to do release work on the weekend, there's > not much point to closing the vote on saturday and pieter can have some > extra time. Anyway, I'll leave that up to Jason to coordinate with Ted as > we traditionally release all our lines of code at once. Once they do close > vote and release the artifacts, it will take up to 24 hours for apache > infrastructure to sync the releases to all the mirrors, so everything is > usually available the day after the vote closes. > > as for voting, every vote counts - though PMC votes are the ones that are > technically "binding" for purpose of a release (in apache terms we need a > "majority approval"[1] to put the release out the door). Now, if any vote, > non-binding or binding came in as -1, we would take that fairly seriously, > discuss it and depending on circumstances could scrap/delay the release. > Testing releases and voting is an excellent and easy way to contribute to > TinkerPop. > > [1] http://apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Paul A. Jackson > wrote: > > > I'm looking for some insight for when 3.2.4 will release. It looks like > > voting closes tomorrow. Is that on schedule, and if so what's a typical > ETA > > for binaries to be posted? > > > > I don't know if my vote counts, but FTW! > > > > VOTE: +1 > > > > Thanks, > > -Paul > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 7:03 AM > > To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release > > > > validate-distribution.sh was good for me - thanks for doing all the work > > on this one Jason. nice job > > > > VOTE: +1 > > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > > > > > Release and docs looks good to me. > > > > > > Validating source distribution > > > > > > * downloading Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 (apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src. > zip)... > > > OK > > > * validating signatures and checksums ... > > > * PGP signature ... OK > > > * MD5 checksum ... OK > > > * SHA1 checksum ... OK > > > * unzipping Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 ... OK > > > * building project ... OK > > > > > > > > > VOTE: +1 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ted > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:32 PM, pieter-gmail > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Ok, however I did test on the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT immediately after > > > > Jason's email on the 2/2/2017 and those changes were not there. > > > > They are there now but there was a SNAPSHOT release on the > > > > 08/02/2017 so things changed. > > > > Anyhow that might just be some SNAPSHOT confusion thing. > > > > > > > > Next time I'll pull the code and build it manually to make sure. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Pieter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 09/02/2017 22:27, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > >> The significant change is > > > > >> ffe1b4c Marko A. Rodriguez on 2016/11/15 > > > > >> at > > > > 12:44 AM > > > > > Ah yea. Thats different from what I thought you had issue with — > > > > has-containers and arrays/collections handling. > > > > > > > > > >> I don't have a problem with the changes just that is quite a > > > > >> refactor > > > on > > > > >> my side as it changes the structure of the HasSteps and its > > > > >> HasContainers. I had made some assumptions around how HasSteps > > > > >> and HasContainers look when optimizing. > > > > > Yea, it “folds left” now so you don’t have to walk over > has()-chains. > > >
Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release
i think it's on schedule still. pieter sounded like he needed a little extra time, but given the nature of the issue he described it didn't seem like that would ultimately turn up something run afoul in the TinkerPop side of things, so my personal inclination would be to close vote when posted and release. on the other hand, the vote closes on a saturday, which means that unless jason intends to do release work on the weekend, there's not much point to closing the vote on saturday and pieter can have some extra time. Anyway, I'll leave that up to Jason to coordinate with Ted as we traditionally release all our lines of code at once. Once they do close vote and release the artifacts, it will take up to 24 hours for apache infrastructure to sync the releases to all the mirrors, so everything is usually available the day after the vote closes. as for voting, every vote counts - though PMC votes are the ones that are technically "binding" for purpose of a release (in apache terms we need a "majority approval"[1] to put the release out the door). Now, if any vote, non-binding or binding came in as -1, we would take that fairly seriously, discuss it and depending on circumstances could scrap/delay the release. Testing releases and voting is an excellent and easy way to contribute to TinkerPop. [1] http://apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Paul A. Jackson wrote: > I'm looking for some insight for when 3.2.4 will release. It looks like > voting closes tomorrow. Is that on schedule, and if so what's a typical ETA > for binaries to be posted? > > I don't know if my vote counts, but FTW! > > VOTE: +1 > > Thanks, > -Paul > > > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 7:03 AM > To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release > > validate-distribution.sh was good for me - thanks for doing all the work > on this one Jason. nice job > > VOTE: +1 > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > > > Release and docs looks good to me. > > > > Validating source distribution > > > > * downloading Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 (apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip)... > > OK > > * validating signatures and checksums ... > > * PGP signature ... OK > > * MD5 checksum ... OK > > * SHA1 checksum ... OK > > * unzipping Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 ... OK > > * building project ... OK > > > > > > VOTE: +1 > > > > Thanks, > > Ted > > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:32 PM, pieter-gmail > > > > wrote: > > > > > Ok, however I did test on the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT immediately after > > > Jason's email on the 2/2/2017 and those changes were not there. > > > They are there now but there was a SNAPSHOT release on the > > > 08/02/2017 so things changed. > > > Anyhow that might just be some SNAPSHOT confusion thing. > > > > > > Next time I'll pull the code and build it manually to make sure. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Pieter > > > > > > > > > > > > On 09/02/2017 22:27, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > >> The significant change is > > > >> ffe1b4c Marko A. Rodriguez on 2016/11/15 > > > >> at > > > 12:44 AM > > > > Ah yea. Thats different from what I thought you had issue with — > > > has-containers and arrays/collections handling. > > > > > > > >> I don't have a problem with the changes just that is quite a > > > >> refactor > > on > > > >> my side as it changes the structure of the HasSteps and its > > > >> HasContainers. I had made some assumptions around how HasSteps > > > >> and HasContainers look when optimizing. > > > > Yea, it “folds left” now so you don’t have to walk over has()-chains. > > > > > > > >> The change is quite old but somehow it was not present in the > > > >> 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT I tested on it when the code freeze announcement > > > >> was made. Not sure what happened there but alas its not giving me > > > >> enough time to get things working again. > > > > I would say don’t wait till releases to test Sqlg. In principle, > > > > you > > > should VOTE on every PR by building and testing the changes against > Sqlg. > > > That is where you can make a huge contribution. > > > > > > > >> So I am not voting negative jus
RE: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release
I'm looking for some insight for when 3.2.4 will release. It looks like voting closes tomorrow. Is that on schedule, and if so what's a typical ETA for binaries to be posted? I don't know if my vote counts, but FTW! VOTE: +1 Thanks, -Paul -Original Message- From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 7:03 AM To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release validate-distribution.sh was good for me - thanks for doing all the work on this one Jason. nice job VOTE: +1 On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > Release and docs looks good to me. > > Validating source distribution > > * downloading Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 (apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip)... > OK > * validating signatures and checksums ... > * PGP signature ... OK > * MD5 checksum ... OK > * SHA1 checksum ... OK > * unzipping Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 ... OK > * building project ... OK > > > VOTE: +1 > > Thanks, > Ted > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:32 PM, pieter-gmail > > wrote: > > > Ok, however I did test on the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT immediately after > > Jason's email on the 2/2/2017 and those changes were not there. > > They are there now but there was a SNAPSHOT release on the > > 08/02/2017 so things changed. > > Anyhow that might just be some SNAPSHOT confusion thing. > > > > Next time I'll pull the code and build it manually to make sure. > > > > Thanks > > Pieter > > > > > > > > On 09/02/2017 22:27, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > >> The significant change is > > >> ffe1b4c Marko A. Rodriguez on 2016/11/15 > > >> at > > 12:44 AM > > > Ah yea. Thats different from what I thought you had issue with — > > has-containers and arrays/collections handling. > > > > > >> I don't have a problem with the changes just that is quite a > > >> refactor > on > > >> my side as it changes the structure of the HasSteps and its > > >> HasContainers. I had made some assumptions around how HasSteps > > >> and HasContainers look when optimizing. > > > Yea, it “folds left” now so you don’t have to walk over has()-chains. > > > > > >> The change is quite old but somehow it was not present in the > > >> 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT I tested on it when the code freeze announcement > > >> was made. Not sure what happened there but alas its not giving me > > >> enough time to get things working again. > > > I would say don’t wait till releases to test Sqlg. In principle, > > > you > > should VOTE on every PR by building and testing the changes against Sqlg. > > That is where you can make a huge contribution. > > > > > >> So I am not voting negative just requesting a weekend, if > > >> possible, to get through the refactor. > > > Again, PR awareness, not release awareness. > > > > > > Marko. > > > > > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > > > > > >> Cheers > > >> Pieter > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> "added TraversalHelper.addHasContainer() on 2016/11/15 > > >> > > >> On 09/02/2017 22:11, Stephen Mallette wrote: > > >>> Unless I'm missing something, HasStep hasn't changed in 4 months > > >>> and HasContainer hasn't changed in 3 months. The only update > > >>> that went in > > after > > >>> 2/2 that I can think of that would have any bearing for graph > > providers who > > >>> tested before/after that date would be the AutoCloseable stuff: > > >>> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/548 > > >>> > > >>> Your problems aren't related to that are they? Can you provide > > >>> some synopsis of where the problems lie? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:47 PM, pieter-gmail < > pieter.mar...@gmail.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hi, > > >>>> > > >>>> Some issues regarding the release process. > > >>>> > > >>>> On the 2/2/2017 the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT was released. > > >>>> I then started testing and found almost no issues. > > >>>> > > >>>> However yesterday when the VOTE mail came I fou
Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release
validate-distribution.sh was good for me - thanks for doing all the work on this one Jason. nice job VOTE: +1 On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > Release and docs looks good to me. > > Validating source distribution > > * downloading Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 (apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip)... > OK > * validating signatures and checksums ... > * PGP signature ... OK > * MD5 checksum ... OK > * SHA1 checksum ... OK > * unzipping Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 ... OK > * building project ... OK > > > VOTE: +1 > > Thanks, > Ted > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:32 PM, pieter-gmail > wrote: > > > Ok, however I did test on the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT immediately after Jason's > > email on the 2/2/2017 and those changes were not there. > > They are there now but there was a SNAPSHOT release on the 08/02/2017 so > > things changed. > > Anyhow that might just be some SNAPSHOT confusion thing. > > > > Next time I'll pull the code and build it manually to make sure. > > > > Thanks > > Pieter > > > > > > > > On 09/02/2017 22:27, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > >> The significant change is > > >> ffe1b4c Marko A. Rodriguez on 2016/11/15 at > > 12:44 AM > > > Ah yea. Thats different from what I thought you had issue with — > > has-containers and arrays/collections handling. > > > > > >> I don't have a problem with the changes just that is quite a refactor > on > > >> my side as it changes the structure of the HasSteps and its > > >> HasContainers. I had made some assumptions around how HasSteps and > > >> HasContainers look when optimizing. > > > Yea, it “folds left” now so you don’t have to walk over has()-chains. > > > > > >> The change is quite old but somehow it was not present in the > > >> 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT I tested on it when the code freeze announcement was > > >> made. Not sure what happened there but alas its not giving me enough > > >> time to get things working again. > > > I would say don’t wait till releases to test Sqlg. In principle, you > > should VOTE on every PR by building and testing the changes against Sqlg. > > That is where you can make a huge contribution. > > > > > >> So I am not voting negative just requesting a weekend, if possible, to > > >> get through the refactor. > > > Again, PR awareness, not release awareness. > > > > > > Marko. > > > > > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > > > > > >> Cheers > > >> Pieter > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> "added TraversalHelper.addHasContainer() on 2016/11/15 > > >> > > >> On 09/02/2017 22:11, Stephen Mallette wrote: > > >>> Unless I'm missing something, HasStep hasn't changed in 4 months and > > >>> HasContainer hasn't changed in 3 months. The only update that went in > > after > > >>> 2/2 that I can think of that would have any bearing for graph > > providers who > > >>> tested before/after that date would be the AutoCloseable stuff: > > >>> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/548 > > >>> > > >>> Your problems aren't related to that are they? Can you provide some > > >>> synopsis of where the problems lie? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:47 PM, pieter-gmail < > pieter.mar...@gmail.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > Hi, > > > > Some issues regarding the release process. > > > > On the 2/2/2017 the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT was released. > > I then started testing and found almost no issues. > > > > However yesterday when the VOTE mail came I found many issues on > > 3.2.4. > > To understand the confusion I tested again on 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT and > found > > the same new issues. > > I then checked the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT timestamp and it changed to > > 08/02/2017 > > > > Not sure what happened there as I can not, nor is it worth it, check > > an > > old SNAPSHOT version's binary. > > The relevant code changes are quite old (December 2016) but it may > > have > > been done on a separate branch and rebasing may loose the merging > > information. Not sure about this though. > > > > This only leaves the 72 hours to catch up. > > > > Even though it is a minor release there has been significant changes > > to > > HasStep and HasContainer which breaks the heart (mine at least) of > > implementors optimization code. > > > > Basically to get any value from a vote I for one will need more > time. > > > > So far I have not found any TinkerPop issues but will need at least > > the > > weekend to know better. > > > > Thanks > > Pieter > > > > On 08/02/2017 16:51, Jason Plurad wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.2.4 is ready for release. > > > > > > The release artifacts can be found at this location: > > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.2.4/ > > > > > > The source distribution is provided by: > > >apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip > > > > > > Two binary
Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release
Release and docs looks good to me. Validating source distribution * downloading Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 (apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip)... OK * validating signatures and checksums ... * PGP signature ... OK * MD5 checksum ... OK * SHA1 checksum ... OK * unzipping Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 ... OK * building project ... OK VOTE: +1 Thanks, Ted On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:32 PM, pieter-gmail wrote: > Ok, however I did test on the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT immediately after Jason's > email on the 2/2/2017 and those changes were not there. > They are there now but there was a SNAPSHOT release on the 08/02/2017 so > things changed. > Anyhow that might just be some SNAPSHOT confusion thing. > > Next time I'll pull the code and build it manually to make sure. > > Thanks > Pieter > > > > On 09/02/2017 22:27, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > > Hi, > > > >> The significant change is > >> ffe1b4c Marko A. Rodriguez on 2016/11/15 at > 12:44 AM > > Ah yea. Thats different from what I thought you had issue with — > has-containers and arrays/collections handling. > > > >> I don't have a problem with the changes just that is quite a refactor on > >> my side as it changes the structure of the HasSteps and its > >> HasContainers. I had made some assumptions around how HasSteps and > >> HasContainers look when optimizing. > > Yea, it “folds left” now so you don’t have to walk over has()-chains. > > > >> The change is quite old but somehow it was not present in the > >> 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT I tested on it when the code freeze announcement was > >> made. Not sure what happened there but alas its not giving me enough > >> time to get things working again. > > I would say don’t wait till releases to test Sqlg. In principle, you > should VOTE on every PR by building and testing the changes against Sqlg. > That is where you can make a huge contribution. > > > >> So I am not voting negative just requesting a weekend, if possible, to > >> get through the refactor. > > Again, PR awareness, not release awareness. > > > > Marko. > > > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > > >> Cheers > >> Pieter > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> "added TraversalHelper.addHasContainer() on 2016/11/15 > >> > >> On 09/02/2017 22:11, Stephen Mallette wrote: > >>> Unless I'm missing something, HasStep hasn't changed in 4 months and > >>> HasContainer hasn't changed in 3 months. The only update that went in > after > >>> 2/2 that I can think of that would have any bearing for graph > providers who > >>> tested before/after that date would be the AutoCloseable stuff: > >>> > >>> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/548 > >>> > >>> Your problems aren't related to that are they? Can you provide some > >>> synopsis of where the problems lie? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:47 PM, pieter-gmail > >>> wrote: > >>> > Hi, > > Some issues regarding the release process. > > On the 2/2/2017 the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT was released. > I then started testing and found almost no issues. > > However yesterday when the VOTE mail came I found many issues on > 3.2.4. > To understand the confusion I tested again on 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT and found > the same new issues. > I then checked the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT timestamp and it changed to > 08/02/2017 > > Not sure what happened there as I can not, nor is it worth it, check > an > old SNAPSHOT version's binary. > The relevant code changes are quite old (December 2016) but it may > have > been done on a separate branch and rebasing may loose the merging > information. Not sure about this though. > > This only leaves the 72 hours to catch up. > > Even though it is a minor release there has been significant changes > to > HasStep and HasContainer which breaks the heart (mine at least) of > implementors optimization code. > > Basically to get any value from a vote I for one will need more time. > > So far I have not found any TinkerPop issues but will need at least > the > weekend to know better. > > Thanks > Pieter > > On 08/02/2017 16:51, Jason Plurad wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.2.4 is ready for release. > > > > The release artifacts can be found at this location: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.2.4/ > > > > The source distribution is provided by: > >apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip > > > > Two binary distributions are provided for user convenience: > >apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.4-bin.zip > >apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.4-bin.zip > > > > The GPG key used to sign the release artifacts is available at: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/KEYS > > > > The online docs can be found here: > >http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.4/ (user docs) > >http://tinkerpop.apache.org/do
Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release
Ok, however I did test on the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT immediately after Jason's email on the 2/2/2017 and those changes were not there. They are there now but there was a SNAPSHOT release on the 08/02/2017 so things changed. Anyhow that might just be some SNAPSHOT confusion thing. Next time I'll pull the code and build it manually to make sure. Thanks Pieter On 09/02/2017 22:27, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Hi, > >> The significant change is >> ffe1b4c Marko A. Rodriguez on 2016/11/15 at 12:44 AM > Ah yea. Thats different from what I thought you had issue with — > has-containers and arrays/collections handling. > >> I don't have a problem with the changes just that is quite a refactor on >> my side as it changes the structure of the HasSteps and its >> HasContainers. I had made some assumptions around how HasSteps and >> HasContainers look when optimizing. > Yea, it “folds left” now so you don’t have to walk over has()-chains. > >> The change is quite old but somehow it was not present in the >> 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT I tested on it when the code freeze announcement was >> made. Not sure what happened there but alas its not giving me enough >> time to get things working again. > I would say don’t wait till releases to test Sqlg. In principle, you should > VOTE on every PR by building and testing the changes against Sqlg. That is > where you can make a huge contribution. > >> So I am not voting negative just requesting a weekend, if possible, to >> get through the refactor. > Again, PR awareness, not release awareness. > > Marko. > > http://markorodriguez.com > > >> Cheers >> Pieter >> >> >> >> >> >> "added TraversalHelper.addHasContainer() on 2016/11/15 >> >> On 09/02/2017 22:11, Stephen Mallette wrote: >>> Unless I'm missing something, HasStep hasn't changed in 4 months and >>> HasContainer hasn't changed in 3 months. The only update that went in after >>> 2/2 that I can think of that would have any bearing for graph providers who >>> tested before/after that date would be the AutoCloseable stuff: >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/548 >>> >>> Your problems aren't related to that are they? Can you provide some >>> synopsis of where the problems lie? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:47 PM, pieter-gmail >>> wrote: >>> Hi, Some issues regarding the release process. On the 2/2/2017 the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT was released. I then started testing and found almost no issues. However yesterday when the VOTE mail came I found many issues on 3.2.4. To understand the confusion I tested again on 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT and found the same new issues. I then checked the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT timestamp and it changed to 08/02/2017 Not sure what happened there as I can not, nor is it worth it, check an old SNAPSHOT version's binary. The relevant code changes are quite old (December 2016) but it may have been done on a separate branch and rebasing may loose the merging information. Not sure about this though. This only leaves the 72 hours to catch up. Even though it is a minor release there has been significant changes to HasStep and HasContainer which breaks the heart (mine at least) of implementors optimization code. Basically to get any value from a vote I for one will need more time. So far I have not found any TinkerPop issues but will need at least the weekend to know better. Thanks Pieter On 08/02/2017 16:51, Jason Plurad wrote: > Hello, > > We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.2.4 is ready for release. > > The release artifacts can be found at this location: >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.2.4/ > > The source distribution is provided by: >apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip > > Two binary distributions are provided for user convenience: >apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.4-bin.zip >apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.4-bin.zip > > The GPG key used to sign the release artifacts is available at: >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/KEYS > > The online docs can be found here: >http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.4/ (user docs) >http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.4/upgrade/ (upgrade docs) >http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.4/core/ (core javadoc) >http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.4/full/ (full javadoc) > > The tag in Apache Git can be found here: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tinkerpop.git;a= tag;h=refs/tags/3.2.4 > The release notes are available here: > > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.2.4/ CHANGELOG.asciidoc#release-3-2-4 > The [VOTE] will be open for the next 72 hours --- closing Saturday > (February 11, 2017) at 10:00 AM EST. > > My vote is +1. > > Thank you very much,
Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release
Hi, > The significant change is > ffe1b4c Marko A. Rodriguez on 2016/11/15 at 12:44 AM Ah yea. Thats different from what I thought you had issue with — has-containers and arrays/collections handling. > I don't have a problem with the changes just that is quite a refactor on > my side as it changes the structure of the HasSteps and its > HasContainers. I had made some assumptions around how HasSteps and > HasContainers look when optimizing. Yea, it “folds left” now so you don’t have to walk over has()-chains. > The change is quite old but somehow it was not present in the > 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT I tested on it when the code freeze announcement was > made. Not sure what happened there but alas its not giving me enough > time to get things working again. I would say don’t wait till releases to test Sqlg. In principle, you should VOTE on every PR by building and testing the changes against Sqlg. That is where you can make a huge contribution. > So I am not voting negative just requesting a weekend, if possible, to > get through the refactor. Again, PR awareness, not release awareness. Marko. http://markorodriguez.com > > Cheers > Pieter > > > > > > "added TraversalHelper.addHasContainer() on 2016/11/15 > > On 09/02/2017 22:11, Stephen Mallette wrote: >> Unless I'm missing something, HasStep hasn't changed in 4 months and >> HasContainer hasn't changed in 3 months. The only update that went in after >> 2/2 that I can think of that would have any bearing for graph providers who >> tested before/after that date would be the AutoCloseable stuff: >> >> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/548 >> >> Your problems aren't related to that are they? Can you provide some >> synopsis of where the problems lie? >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:47 PM, pieter-gmail >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Some issues regarding the release process. >>> >>> On the 2/2/2017 the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT was released. >>> I then started testing and found almost no issues. >>> >>> However yesterday when the VOTE mail came I found many issues on 3.2.4. >>> To understand the confusion I tested again on 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT and found >>> the same new issues. >>> I then checked the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT timestamp and it changed to 08/02/2017 >>> >>> Not sure what happened there as I can not, nor is it worth it, check an >>> old SNAPSHOT version's binary. >>> The relevant code changes are quite old (December 2016) but it may have >>> been done on a separate branch and rebasing may loose the merging >>> information. Not sure about this though. >>> >>> This only leaves the 72 hours to catch up. >>> >>> Even though it is a minor release there has been significant changes to >>> HasStep and HasContainer which breaks the heart (mine at least) of >>> implementors optimization code. >>> >>> Basically to get any value from a vote I for one will need more time. >>> >>> So far I have not found any TinkerPop issues but will need at least the >>> weekend to know better. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Pieter >>> >>> On 08/02/2017 16:51, Jason Plurad wrote: Hello, We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.2.4 is ready for release. The release artifacts can be found at this location: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.2.4/ The source distribution is provided by: apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip Two binary distributions are provided for user convenience: apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.4-bin.zip apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.4-bin.zip The GPG key used to sign the release artifacts is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/KEYS The online docs can be found here: http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.4/ (user docs) http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.4/upgrade/ (upgrade docs) http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.4/core/ (core javadoc) http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.4/full/ (full javadoc) The tag in Apache Git can be found here: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tinkerpop.git;a= >>> tag;h=refs/tags/3.2.4 The release notes are available here: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.2.4/ >>> CHANGELOG.asciidoc#release-3-2-4 The [VOTE] will be open for the next 72 hours --- closing Saturday (February 11, 2017) at 10:00 AM EST. My vote is +1. Thank you very much, Jason Plurad >>> >
Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release
The significant change is ffe1b4c Marko A. Rodriguez on 2016/11/15 at 12:44 AM The description is "added TraversalHelper.addHasContainer() which will either append a HasStep with container or if the traverasl ends with a HasContainerHolder, fold the container into the holder. This just makes the code in GraphTravesrsal cleaner with less copy/paste." I don't have a problem with the changes just that is quite a refactor on my side as it changes the structure of the HasSteps and its HasContainers. I had made some assumptions around how HasSteps and HasContainers look when optimizing. The change is quite old but somehow it was not present in the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT I tested on it when the code freeze announcement was made. Not sure what happened there but alas its not giving me enough time to get things working again. So I am not voting negative just requesting a weekend, if possible, to get through the refactor. Cheers Pieter "added TraversalHelper.addHasContainer() on 2016/11/15 On 09/02/2017 22:11, Stephen Mallette wrote: > Unless I'm missing something, HasStep hasn't changed in 4 months and > HasContainer hasn't changed in 3 months. The only update that went in after > 2/2 that I can think of that would have any bearing for graph providers who > tested before/after that date would be the AutoCloseable stuff: > > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/548 > > Your problems aren't related to that are they? Can you provide some > synopsis of where the problems lie? > > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:47 PM, pieter-gmail > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Some issues regarding the release process. >> >> On the 2/2/2017 the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT was released. >> I then started testing and found almost no issues. >> >> However yesterday when the VOTE mail came I found many issues on 3.2.4. >> To understand the confusion I tested again on 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT and found >> the same new issues. >> I then checked the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT timestamp and it changed to 08/02/2017 >> >> Not sure what happened there as I can not, nor is it worth it, check an >> old SNAPSHOT version's binary. >> The relevant code changes are quite old (December 2016) but it may have >> been done on a separate branch and rebasing may loose the merging >> information. Not sure about this though. >> >> This only leaves the 72 hours to catch up. >> >> Even though it is a minor release there has been significant changes to >> HasStep and HasContainer which breaks the heart (mine at least) of >> implementors optimization code. >> >> Basically to get any value from a vote I for one will need more time. >> >> So far I have not found any TinkerPop issues but will need at least the >> weekend to know better. >> >> Thanks >> Pieter >> >> On 08/02/2017 16:51, Jason Plurad wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.2.4 is ready for release. >>> >>> The release artifacts can be found at this location: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.2.4/ >>> >>> The source distribution is provided by: >>> apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip >>> >>> Two binary distributions are provided for user convenience: >>> apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.4-bin.zip >>> apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.4-bin.zip >>> >>> The GPG key used to sign the release artifacts is available at: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/KEYS >>> >>> The online docs can be found here: >>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.4/ (user docs) >>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.4/upgrade/ (upgrade docs) >>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.4/core/ (core javadoc) >>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.4/full/ (full javadoc) >>> >>> The tag in Apache Git can be found here: >>> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tinkerpop.git;a= >> tag;h=refs/tags/3.2.4 >>> The release notes are available here: >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.2.4/ >> CHANGELOG.asciidoc#release-3-2-4 >>> The [VOTE] will be open for the next 72 hours --- closing Saturday >>> (February 11, 2017) at 10:00 AM EST. >>> >>> My vote is +1. >>> >>> Thank you very much, >>> Jason Plurad >>> >>
Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release
Hello Pieter, The “has” changes were a confusion over the last 2 releases where the semantic interpretation of arrays and collections were being challenged and then reverted. However, that was a few releases ago, not this release. There were discussions on the topic back then too. Marko. http://markorodriguez.com > On Feb 9, 2017, at 12:47 PM, pieter-gmail wrote: > > Hi, > > Some issues regarding the release process. > > On the 2/2/2017 the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT was released. > I then started testing and found almost no issues. > > However yesterday when the VOTE mail came I found many issues on 3.2.4. > To understand the confusion I tested again on 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT and found > the same new issues. > I then checked the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT timestamp and it changed to 08/02/2017 > > Not sure what happened there as I can not, nor is it worth it, check an > old SNAPSHOT version's binary. > The relevant code changes are quite old (December 2016) but it may have > been done on a separate branch and rebasing may loose the merging > information. Not sure about this though. > > This only leaves the 72 hours to catch up. > > Even though it is a minor release there has been significant changes to > HasStep and HasContainer which breaks the heart (mine at least) of > implementors optimization code. > > Basically to get any value from a vote I for one will need more time. > > So far I have not found any TinkerPop issues but will need at least the > weekend to know better. > > Thanks > Pieter > > On 08/02/2017 16:51, Jason Plurad wrote: >> Hello, >> >> We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.2.4 is ready for release. >> >> The release artifacts can be found at this location: >>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.2.4/ >> >> The source distribution is provided by: >>apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip >> >> Two binary distributions are provided for user convenience: >>apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.4-bin.zip >>apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.4-bin.zip >> >> The GPG key used to sign the release artifacts is available at: >>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/KEYS >> >> The online docs can be found here: >>http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.4/ (user docs) >>http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.4/upgrade/ (upgrade docs) >>http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.4/core/ (core javadoc) >>http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.4/full/ (full javadoc) >> >> The tag in Apache Git can be found here: >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tinkerpop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/3.2.4 >> >> The release notes are available here: >> >> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.2.4/CHANGELOG.asciidoc#release-3-2-4 >> >> The [VOTE] will be open for the next 72 hours --- closing Saturday >> (February 11, 2017) at 10:00 AM EST. >> >> My vote is +1. >> >> Thank you very much, >> Jason Plurad >> >
Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release
Unless I'm missing something, HasStep hasn't changed in 4 months and HasContainer hasn't changed in 3 months. The only update that went in after 2/2 that I can think of that would have any bearing for graph providers who tested before/after that date would be the AutoCloseable stuff: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/548 Your problems aren't related to that are they? Can you provide some synopsis of where the problems lie? On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:47 PM, pieter-gmail wrote: > Hi, > > Some issues regarding the release process. > > On the 2/2/2017 the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT was released. > I then started testing and found almost no issues. > > However yesterday when the VOTE mail came I found many issues on 3.2.4. > To understand the confusion I tested again on 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT and found > the same new issues. > I then checked the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT timestamp and it changed to 08/02/2017 > > Not sure what happened there as I can not, nor is it worth it, check an > old SNAPSHOT version's binary. > The relevant code changes are quite old (December 2016) but it may have > been done on a separate branch and rebasing may loose the merging > information. Not sure about this though. > > This only leaves the 72 hours to catch up. > > Even though it is a minor release there has been significant changes to > HasStep and HasContainer which breaks the heart (mine at least) of > implementors optimization code. > > Basically to get any value from a vote I for one will need more time. > > So far I have not found any TinkerPop issues but will need at least the > weekend to know better. > > Thanks > Pieter > > On 08/02/2017 16:51, Jason Plurad wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.2.4 is ready for release. > > > > The release artifacts can be found at this location: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.2.4/ > > > > The source distribution is provided by: > > apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip > > > > Two binary distributions are provided for user convenience: > > apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.4-bin.zip > > apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.4-bin.zip > > > > The GPG key used to sign the release artifacts is available at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/KEYS > > > > The online docs can be found here: > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.4/ (user docs) > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.4/upgrade/ (upgrade docs) > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.4/core/ (core javadoc) > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.4/full/ (full javadoc) > > > > The tag in Apache Git can be found here: > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tinkerpop.git;a= > tag;h=refs/tags/3.2.4 > > > > The release notes are available here: > > > > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.2.4/ > CHANGELOG.asciidoc#release-3-2-4 > > > > The [VOTE] will be open for the next 72 hours --- closing Saturday > > (February 11, 2017) at 10:00 AM EST. > > > > My vote is +1. > > > > Thank you very much, > > Jason Plurad > > > >
Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release
Hi, Some issues regarding the release process. On the 2/2/2017 the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT was released. I then started testing and found almost no issues. However yesterday when the VOTE mail came I found many issues on 3.2.4. To understand the confusion I tested again on 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT and found the same new issues. I then checked the 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT timestamp and it changed to 08/02/2017 Not sure what happened there as I can not, nor is it worth it, check an old SNAPSHOT version's binary. The relevant code changes are quite old (December 2016) but it may have been done on a separate branch and rebasing may loose the merging information. Not sure about this though. This only leaves the 72 hours to catch up. Even though it is a minor release there has been significant changes to HasStep and HasContainer which breaks the heart (mine at least) of implementors optimization code. Basically to get any value from a vote I for one will need more time. So far I have not found any TinkerPop issues but will need at least the weekend to know better. Thanks Pieter On 08/02/2017 16:51, Jason Plurad wrote: > Hello, > > We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.2.4 is ready for release. > > The release artifacts can be found at this location: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.2.4/ > > The source distribution is provided by: > apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip > > Two binary distributions are provided for user convenience: > apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.4-bin.zip > apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.4-bin.zip > > The GPG key used to sign the release artifacts is available at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/KEYS > > The online docs can be found here: > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.4/ (user docs) > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.4/upgrade/ (upgrade docs) > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.4/core/ (core javadoc) > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.4/full/ (full javadoc) > > The tag in Apache Git can be found here: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tinkerpop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/3.2.4 > > The release notes are available here: > > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.2.4/CHANGELOG.asciidoc#release-3-2-4 > > The [VOTE] will be open for the next 72 hours --- closing Saturday > (February 11, 2017) at 10:00 AM EST. > > My vote is +1. > > Thank you very much, > Jason Plurad >
Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release
- Successfully tested Python driver (Goblin) against binary server zip - Built the source zip/tested gremlin-python with: mvn clean install && mvn verify -pl gremlin-python - BUILD SUCCESS - Ran the validate script: $ bin/validate-distribution.sh 3.2.4 Validating binary distributions * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin (apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.4-bin.zip)... OK * validating signatures and checksums ... * PGP signature ... OK * MD5 checksum ... OK * SHA1 checksum ... OK * unzipping Apache TinkerPop Gremlin ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's docs ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's binaries ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's legal files ... * LICENSE ... OK * NOTICE ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's plugin directory ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's lib directory ... OK * testing script evaluation ... OK * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin (apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.4-bin.zip)... OK * validating signatures and checksums ... * PGP signature ... OK * MD5 checksum ... OK * SHA1 checksum ... OK * unzipping Apache TinkerPop Gremlin ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's docs ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's binaries ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's legal files ... * LICENSE ... OK * NOTICE ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's plugin directory ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's lib directory ... OK Validating source distribution * downloading Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 (apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip)... OK * validating signatures and checksums ... * PGP signature ... OK * MD5 checksum ... OK * SHA1 checksum ... OK * unzipping Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 ... OK * building project ... OK VOTE +1 On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Daniel Kuppitz wrote: > *Validating binary distributions* > > * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin > (apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.4-bin.zip)... OK > * validating signatures and checksums ... > * PGP signature ... OK > * MD5 checksum ... OK > * SHA1 checksum ... OK > * unzipping Apache TinkerPop Gremlin ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's docs ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's binaries ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's legal files ... > * LICENSE ... OK > * NOTICE ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's plugin directory ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's lib directory ... OK > * testing script evaluation ... OK > > * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin > (apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.4-bin.zip)... OK > * validating signatures and checksums ... > * PGP signature ... OK > * MD5 checksum ... OK > * SHA1 checksum ... OK > * unzipping Apache TinkerPop Gremlin ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's docs ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's binaries ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's legal files ... > * LICENSE ... OK > * NOTICE ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's plugin directory ... OK > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's lib directory ... OK > > *Validating source distribution* > > * downloading Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 (apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip)... OK > * validating signatures and checksums ... > * PGP signature ... OK > * MD5 checksum ... OK > * SHA1 checksum ... OK > * unzipping Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 ... OK > * building project ... OK > > Also looked through the docs - looked good to me. > > VOTE: +1 > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Jason Plurad wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.2.4 is ready for release. >> >> The release artifacts can be found at this location: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.2.4/ >> >> The source distribution is provided by: >> apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip >> >> Two binary distributions are provided for user convenience: >> apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.4-bin.zip >> apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.4-bin.zip >> >> The GPG key used to sign the release artifacts is available at: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/KEYS >> >> The online docs can be found here: >> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.4/ (user docs) >> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.4/upgrade/ (upgrade docs) >> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.4/core/ (core javadoc) >> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.4/full/ (full javadoc) >> >> The tag in Apache Git can be found here: >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tinkerpop.git;a= >> tag;h=refs/tags/3.2.4 >> >> The release notes are available here: >> >> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.2.4/ >> CHANGELOG.asciidoc#release-3-2-4 >> >> The [VOTE] will be open for the next 72 hours --- closing Saturday >> (February 11, 2017) at 10:00 AM EST. >> >> My vote is +1. >> >> Thank you very much, >> Jason Plurad >> -- Davi
Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release
*Validating binary distributions* * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin (apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.4-bin.zip)... OK * validating signatures and checksums ... * PGP signature ... OK * MD5 checksum ... OK * SHA1 checksum ... OK * unzipping Apache TinkerPop Gremlin ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's docs ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's binaries ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's legal files ... * LICENSE ... OK * NOTICE ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's plugin directory ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's lib directory ... OK * testing script evaluation ... OK * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin (apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.4-bin.zip)... OK * validating signatures and checksums ... * PGP signature ... OK * MD5 checksum ... OK * SHA1 checksum ... OK * unzipping Apache TinkerPop Gremlin ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's docs ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's binaries ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's legal files ... * LICENSE ... OK * NOTICE ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's plugin directory ... OK * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's lib directory ... OK *Validating source distribution* * downloading Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 (apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip)... OK * validating signatures and checksums ... * PGP signature ... OK * MD5 checksum ... OK * SHA1 checksum ... OK * unzipping Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 ... OK * building project ... OK Also looked through the docs - looked good to me. VOTE: +1 Cheers, Daniel On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Jason Plurad wrote: > Hello, > > We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.2.4 is ready for release. > > The release artifacts can be found at this location: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.2.4/ > > The source distribution is provided by: > apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip > > Two binary distributions are provided for user convenience: > apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.4-bin.zip > apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.4-bin.zip > > The GPG key used to sign the release artifacts is available at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/KEYS > > The online docs can be found here: > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.4/ (user docs) > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.4/upgrade/ (upgrade docs) > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.4/core/ (core javadoc) > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.4/full/ (full javadoc) > > The tag in Apache Git can be found here: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tinkerpop.git;a= > tag;h=refs/tags/3.2.4 > > The release notes are available here: > > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.2.4/ > CHANGELOG.asciidoc#release-3-2-4 > > The [VOTE] will be open for the next 72 hours --- closing Saturday > (February 11, 2017) at 10:00 AM EST. > > My vote is +1. > > Thank you very much, > Jason Plurad >
