Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially released? If it will, when and will it be identical to the load found at: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/http://people.apache.org/%7Eremm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/? Martin On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/http://people.apache.org/%7Eremm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 13:22 -0400, Martin Dubuc wrote: What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially released? If it will, when and will it be identical to the load found at: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/http://people.apache.org/%7Eremm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/? I've been in lazy mode ... It has been mirrored, so only the last step remains (updating the website). Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
Martin Dubuc wrote: What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially released? that is based on the voting results, which passed, so yes, it will be released. If it will, when and will it be identical to the load found at: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/http://people.apache.org/%7Eremm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/? releases are source based, so only the sources would have to be identical, but my guess is that everything will be. Filip Martin On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/http://people.apache.org/%7Eremm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
On 02/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com wrote: Martin Dubuc wrote: What is going to happen to the 6.0.20 load? Will it be officially released? that is based on the voting results, which passed, so yes, it will be released. I've not seen the [VOTE][RESULT] e-mail ? If it will, when and will it be identical to the load found at: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/http://people.apache.org/%7Eremm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/? releases are source based, so only the sources would have to be identical, but my guess is that everything will be. Filip Martin On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/http://people.apache.org/%7Eremm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 01:33 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable Ok, so with one exception, all voted stable, so it looks like it is good enough. Last call. Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 17:02 +0400, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: I do not see any issues with the release, except the one of the tgz sources archive. Regarding the tgz archive of the sources I propose the following: The build was created on an Unix machine, so the files in the zip archive are good enough to rerun the build on unixes. Thus, it is sufficient to repack the archive as tgz. I prepared such an archive and placed it in http://people.apache.org/~kkolinko/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/src/ md5 sum is 6a747d5bfa6b0b57605e8697ca8a4cae *apache-tomcat-6.0.20-src.tar.gz Hacks were used in the past, but at the moment I prefer if the released files correspond to the svn tag. Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
2009/5/24 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com: 2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [x] Stable I do not see any issues with the release, except the one of the tgz sources archive. Regarding the tgz archive of the sources I propose the following: The build was created on an Unix machine, so the files in the zip archive are good enough to rerun the build on unixes. Thus, it is sufficient to repack the archive as tgz. I prepared such an archive and placed it in http://people.apache.org/~kkolinko/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/src/ md5 sum is 6a747d5bfa6b0b57605e8697ca8a4cae *apache-tomcat-6.0.20-src.tar.gz Release notes, as displayed by Windows installer, are unreadable. https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47267 The option to display the file is on by default, so it affects a lot of people. Though may be most of them do not care. Based on this, and on our issues with src.tar.gz archive, I change my vote to [x] Beta Please review and vote on current and upcoming proposed patches in STATUS. Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
2009/5/24 sebb seb...@gmail.com: On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [x] Stable I do not see any issues with the release, except the one of the tgz sources archive. Regarding the tgz archive of the sources I propose the following: The build was created on an Unix machine, so the files in the zip archive are good enough to rerun the build on unixes. Thus, it is sufficient to repack the archive as tgz. Strictly speaking, it's not sufficient, because the binary archives are supposed to be derivable from the source archives. It is source archive (-src.tar.gz) I am talking about. All binaries are derivable from it. I do not see a contradiction here. It contains the same files as -src.zip. I used Apache Ant 1.7.0 to repack these sources (using the package-src-tgz target from dist.xml, but with fxcrlf filter removed). See http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what at the end of the section it says: In all such cases, the binary/bytecode package must have the same version number as the source release and may only add binary/bytecode files that are the result of compiling that version of the source code release. This is not the case for the tgz archive. I prepared such an archive and placed it in http://people.apache.org/~kkolinko/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/src/ md5 sum is 6a747d5bfa6b0b57605e8697ca8a4cae *apache-tomcat-6.0.20-src.tar.gz There are also the following options: 1. Rerun the build, but now with LANG=en_US.ISO8859-1; export LANG; before it. It will fix the UTF-8 issue with -src.tar.gz 2. Release as is. As Mark noted, 6.0.18 suffers from the same issue. I am OK with it. Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
On 25/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/5/24 sebb seb...@gmail.com: On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [x] Stable I do not see any issues with the release, except the one of the tgz sources archive. Regarding the tgz archive of the sources I propose the following: The build was created on an Unix machine, so the files in the zip archive are good enough to rerun the build on unixes. Thus, it is sufficient to repack the archive as tgz. Strictly speaking, it's not sufficient, because the binary archives are supposed to be derivable from the source archives. It is source archive (-src.tar.gz) I am talking about. All binaries are derivable from it. Oops, sorry. I do not see a contradiction here. Agreed. It contains the same files as -src.zip. I used Apache Ant 1.7.0 to repack these sources (using the package-src-tgz target from dist.xml, but with fxcrlf filter removed). See http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what at the end of the section it says: In all such cases, the binary/bytecode package must have the same version number as the source release and may only add binary/bytecode files that are the result of compiling that version of the source code release. This is not the case for the tgz archive. I prepared such an archive and placed it in http://people.apache.org/~kkolinko/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/src/ md5 sum is 6a747d5bfa6b0b57605e8697ca8a4cae *apache-tomcat-6.0.20-src.tar.gz There are also the following options: 1. Rerun the build, but now with LANG=en_US.ISO8859-1; export LANG; before it. It will fix the UTF-8 issue with -src.tar.gz OK. 2. Release as is. As Mark noted, 6.0.18 suffers from the same issue. I am OK with it. I think it would be a bad idea to release 6.0.20 with the same fault. Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [x] Stable I do not see any issues with the release, except the one of the tgz sources archive. Regarding the tgz archive of the sources I propose the following: The build was created on an Unix machine, so the files in the zip archive are good enough to rerun the build on unixes. Thus, it is sufficient to repack the archive as tgz. I prepared such an archive and placed it in http://people.apache.org/~kkolinko/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/src/ md5 sum is 6a747d5bfa6b0b57605e8697ca8a4cae *apache-tomcat-6.0.20-src.tar.gz Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [x] Stable I do not see any issues with the release, except the one of the tgz sources archive. Regarding the tgz archive of the sources I propose the following: The build was created on an Unix machine, so the files in the zip archive are good enough to rerun the build on unixes. Thus, it is sufficient to repack the archive as tgz. Strictly speaking, it's not sufficient, because the binary archives are supposed to be derivable from the source archives. See http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what at the end of the section it says: In all such cases, the binary/bytecode package must have the same version number as the source release and may only add binary/bytecode files that are the result of compiling that version of the source code release. This is not the case for the tgz archive. I prepared such an archive and placed it in http://people.apache.org/~kkolinko/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/src/ md5 sum is 6a747d5bfa6b0b57605e8697ca8a4cae *apache-tomcat-6.0.20-src.tar.gz Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
Just clarification: The tgz is broken. Assuming that is fixed, I see no problems and the actual *codebase* is [X] Stable On May 20, 2009, at 12:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: [X] Broken On May 20, 2009, at 11:50 AM, sebb wrote: extras/catalina-ws.jar does not have a NOTICE or a LICENSE file. All jars should ideally have NL files, but they must be present if the jar is published separately, as appears to be the case here. The EXE fails to install the following file: RELEASE-NOTES It also fails to install RUNNING.txt and most of the contents of the bin directory (compared with the zip archive) but those are perhaps not as essential. As noted already, the properties files are corrupt in the tgz version of the source. -1 because of the above problems. On 14/05/2009, Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Rémy Observations -src.tar.gz - hashes match, key in WOT (more sigs would be nice though) Minor issues 1. The fixcrlf task is adding newlines to the end of files that don't end in a bank line making comparing -src.tar.gz against an svn export harder. I've patched trunk and proposed the fix for 6.0.x 2. i18n resources are still corrupted. There is a patch already in the STATUS file to fix this. Was an issue in 6.0.18 so this is a bug that has not been fixed rather than a regression. 3. A couple of other files are also corrupted. Again, there is a patch already in the STATUS file to fix this. I'm happy living with these minor niggles for 6.0.20 4. Servlet TCK passes under normal operation and with a SecurityManager a handful fail (as expected) due to restricted network access. 5. JSP TCK passes under normal operation and fails under the security manager. This is a known bug, again - patches are in the STATUS file. So in summary, a few minor niggles but nothing we haven't had in previous releases. Hence my stable vote. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
On 22.05.2009 15:45, Mark Thomas wrote: 2. i18n resources are still corrupted. There is a patch already in the STATUS file to fix this. Was an issue in 6.0.18 so this is a bug that has not been fixed rather than a regression. But only for the tarball source distribution, right? I checked some in the intl jars of the bin distributions, which looked OK. Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
On 14.05.2009 01:33, Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Looks OK :-) Cheers Jean-Frederic Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
extras/catalina-ws.jar does not have a NOTICE or a LICENSE file. All jars should ideally have NL files, but they must be present if the jar is published separately, as appears to be the case here. The EXE fails to install the following file: RELEASE-NOTES It also fails to install RUNNING.txt and most of the contents of the bin directory (compared with the zip archive) but those are perhaps not as essential. As noted already, the properties files are corrupt in the tgz version of the source. -1 because of the above problems. On 14/05/2009, Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
[X] Stable Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
On 14.05.2009 01:33, Remy Maucherat wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable Please stay tuned, I can test and vote tomorrow. Thanks for RMing. Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
[X] Broken On May 20, 2009, at 11:50 AM, sebb wrote: extras/catalina-ws.jar does not have a NOTICE or a LICENSE file. All jars should ideally have NL files, but they must be present if the jar is published separately, as appears to be the case here. The EXE fails to install the following file: RELEASE-NOTES It also fails to install RUNNING.txt and most of the contents of the bin directory (compared with the zip archive) but those are perhaps not as essential. As noted already, the properties files are corrupt in the tgz version of the source. -1 because of the above problems. On 14/05/2009, Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.20
2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Rémy
The tgz archive of the sources is broken.
Some of the files there have undergone conversion to UTF-8,
while the relevant ones in the zip archive remain in ISO-8859-1.
Here is an example of those lines that differ:
* \src\_tgz\java\javax\servlet\LocalStrings_fr.properties
err.not_iso8859_1={0} n''est pas un caractя┐�`re ISO 8859-1
value.true=true
* \src\_zip\java\javax\servlet\LocalStrings_fr.properties
err.not_iso8859_1={0} n''est pas un caractшre ISO 8859-1
value.true=true
*
Disregard the Cyrillic encoding issues - you may see that the count of
characters differ.
Here is the list of files that are broken:
/KEYS
/java/javax/servlet/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/javax/servlet/http/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/core/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/loader/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/manager/LocalStrings_de.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/manager/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/realm/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/security/LocalStrings_es.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/security/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/servlets/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/session/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/startup/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/users/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/util/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/catalina/valves/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/jasper/resources/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/naming/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/naming/resources/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/res/LocalStrings_es.properties
/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/res/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/res/LocalStrings_es.properties
/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/res/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse/res/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/res/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads/res/LocalStrings_es.properties
/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads/res/LocalStrings_fr.properties
/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
/webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes/LocalStrings_es.properties
/webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes/LocalStrings_fr.properties
The binary distributions seem to be OK.
At least:
1) tgz and zip archives match each other
2) by quick look into tomcat-i18n-fr.jar the properties files are OK there
3) the properties files in /webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes are also OK
Some other small discrepancies that can be fixed later:
1. the apache-tomcat-6.0.20-fulldocs.tar.gz file contains two exact copies of
/tomcat-6.0-doc/RUNNING.txt
2. the exe installer and zip distributive have the following
difference in server.xml :
* C:\PROGRAM FILES\APACHE SOFTWARE FOUNDATION\TOMCAT 6.0\CONF\server.xml
!-- You should set jvmRoute to support load-balancing via AJP ie :
Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=localhost jvmRoute=jvm1
--
* C:\(...)\_ZIP\CONF\SERVER.XML
!-- You should set jvmRoute to support load-balancing via AJP ie :
Engine name=Catalina defaultHost=localhost jvmRoute=jvm1
--
*
I have not run the binaries yet.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
