FYI: Emergency TCW this Saturday, February 20, 0600-1000 PT
tl;dr: this will be a "Soft Close" to deal with glibc updates As most of you know, upgrading glibc requires a reboot of each Linux host. With so many hosts needing to be rebooted, there will be impacts on the build and test machinery. We fully expect the system to self-recover, but jobs in progress may burn. So we are calling this a "Soft Close". While the trees remain open, devs are expected to monitor their own jobs, and restart or cancel as needed. Or, just enjoy a few more hours away from the keyboard. Thanks for your understanding, --Hal for the many Mozilla teams coordinating our response. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: APNG and Accept-Encoding
On 18/02/16 07:45, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: > Is there a response to the criticism of Accept outlined here: > https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Why_not_conneg#Negotiating_by_format As Guardian of the Accept Header, that would be my question too. Using Accept to detect APNG support will never be reliable because not everyone who has shipped it sends the header. So you have to detect support by sniffing anyway. So what does Accept give you, other than the promise of perhaps being able to rely on it in 10 years time if nothing else goes wrong? Gerv ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Generic Task Cluster Tasks / File Based Task Scheduling
On 17/02/16 01:59 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: * You can now only run tasks if certain files changed. This opens the door for drastic reduction in automation load via more intelligent scheduling of tasks via in-tree configurations. (For the curious, relevant commits/files are determined from a combination of the Mercurial pushlog and phases, so pushes to Try not pushing all changesets will still pull in changes from draft changesets previously pushed to Try.) See https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/eee2e3b43fc1 for more on this feature. As part of this, the eslint task has been converted to a generic task and now only runs if certain files change. This means e.g. C++ only pushes shouldn't trigger eslint tasks. Somewhat related, we should also only lint the files that were touched by a given push. This ties in to the mozlint proposal I made awhile back. I should really try and polish that up and get something landed. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: APNG and Accept-Encoding
Is there a response to the criticism of Accept outlined here: https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Why_not_conneg#Negotiating_by_format -Jeff On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Mike Lawtherwrote: > Hi Mozilla developers! > > tl,dr; can Firefox send an Accept-Encoding heading for APNG? > > I'm an engineer at Google working on Chrome. We're considering support for > APNG. > > To support APNG, we think it's important for web developers (including for > example CDN operators) to be able to decide server-side what content to > ship. We want to send an Accept-Encoding header. This would be for whatever > MIME type APNG ends up with, but that's another topic. The latest I've seen > on this is "vnd.mozilla.apng" (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ > show_bug.cgi?id=1160200). > > If Chrome does decide to support APNG, it would be ideal for both our > browsers to be compatible in this respect as well. > > Is this something we can coordinate on? > > thanks, > > Mike Lawther > ___ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Generic Task Cluster Tasks / File Based Task Scheduling
On 2016-02-17 01:59 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: > * You can now only run tasks if certain files changed. This is *awesome*. Thank you! ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: APNG and Accept-Encoding
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Mike Lawtherwrote: > Is this something we can coordinate on? Do you mean the Accept header? Not sure how Accept-Encoding makes sense here. As for the MIME type to mention there, as I said in the bug I think we should just ship image/apng (or video/apng though that seems a little weird given the precedence set by GIF). Using the vnd tree makes no sense for a format supported by multiple parties. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/ ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform