Re: Proposed W3C Charters: All Groups, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Anne, David, Le 3 mars 2015 à 05:15, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl a écrit : 1) Stop any kind of Member-only activity. Require coordination and discussion in public. It seems it's part of their intent without stopping totally. Some groups indeed seem to be in between In http://www.w3.org/2012/10/draft-pfwg-charter • Kept group chartered to operate in Member space when needed, but stated that work will now default to public space. Existing projects will be moved to public space, though legacy resources (old minutes, issue tracking, etc.) cannot be moved due to confidentiality change restrictions. In http://www.w3.org/2013/04/draft-wcag-charter Some communications between editors may be member-confidential. In http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/draft_auwg_charter.html Proceedings are Public. Some communications between editors and/or during the implementation testing period may be member-confidential. In http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2013/draft_uawg_charter Some communications between editors and/or during the implementation testing period may be member-confidential. … Proceedings are Public. Some communications between editors and/or during the implementation testing period may be member-confidential. The only group which stays completely Member-only is the WAI Coordination Group Charter In http://www.w3.org/WAI/CG/charter5.html Proceedings are Member-only This is strange given that the list of Group dependencies are public only groups. http://www.w3.org/WAI/CG/charter5.html#coordination And in the list of activities, there is nothing which seems to require Member-only confidentiality. Checking their mailing list archives I do not see anything which seem to require to be Member Confidential. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-wai-cg/ Or to the opposite most messages seem of public interest. -- Karl Dubost, Mozilla http://www.la-grange.net/karl/moz ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Proposed W3C Charters: All Groups, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
The W3C is proposing revised charters for nearly all of the working groups in the Web Accessibility Initiative (all except Independent User Interface): https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2015Feb/0007.html Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group (APA WG) (Formerly the Protocols and Formats Working Group) http://www.w3.org/2012/10/draft-pfwg-charter Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (WCAG WG) http://www.w3.org/2013/04/draft-wcag-charter Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (ATAG WG) http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/draft_auwg_charter.html User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (UAWG) http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2013/draft_uawg_charter Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/charter5.html Education and Outreach Working Group (EOWG) http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2013/charter6 Research and Development Working Group (RDWG) http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/charter4.html WAI Interest Group (WAI IG) http://www.w3.org/WAI/IG/charter5.html WAI Coordination Group (WAI CG) http://www.w3.org/WAI/CG/charter5.html Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through Monday, March 23. Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should say as part of this charter review, or whether you think we should explicitly abstain. (Note that we can only explicitly abstain from the set of charters as a whole, not individually, at least on the ballot form, though I suppose we could do so in prose.) -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914) signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Proposed W3C Charters: All Groups, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:57 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote: Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should say as part of this charter review, or whether you think we should explicitly abstain. (Note that we can only explicitly abstain from the set of charters as a whole, not individually, at least on the ballot form, though I suppose we could do so in prose.) High-level comments that might be worth making would be: 1) Stop any kind of Member-only activity. Require coordination and discussion in public. 2) Merge the public discussion list and the WG list as e.g. WebApps and other groups have it so everyone is on equal footing. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/ ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
