RE: [PATCH] SMS message center support for AT2 module.
> -Original Message- > From: Bruno David Rodrigues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > I've applied your patch (with some minor changes (*)) and will commit > tomorrow morning > (my cable modem doesn't allow cvs or else there's some bad routing) Thanks! That's the one patch I was almost sure will never get into CVS :-) > (*) I'm using Octstr instead of that temp[500], added the That is the Right Thing(tm) - char[500] is just me being lazy. > configuration > reading > and, acording to the standard (and my ericsson said the > same), it misses the > quotas > It's AT+CSCA="number" That's what my hand book says to, but wavecom eats is w/o quotes so I just didn't bother (me being lazy again ;-) > Could please others try it using an international number, to > see if it's > necessary to > add the ",145" to the end when we have a "+"? I will, and will report back. Thanks again Oded Arbel m-Wise Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.
smsc_at2
Today I sent to my wavecom gsm modem (at2 current cvs) a sms with alphanumeric sender. Instead of the usual +CMT:, 25 (or whatever number) and the pdu, I got: +CMTI: "SM",3 nothing else. Obviusly kannel said "I got CMT but wait next line timed out. I think we should do something in at2 before new release. Sending same sms on my 8210 works, id est it reads correctly it. Andreas? Regards Andrea
Flash Message..
is it possible to push flash messages using kannel? if yes how? TIA -- The information contained in this message (including any attachments) is confidential and intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). It must not be copied, distributed nor disclosed to any person. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it from your system and notify sender immediately. Any disclosure, copying or distribution thereof or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance thereon is prohibited and may be unlawful. --
Re: Log
Hi Ian, I'll try to get some info on the Windows SCM (Service Control Manager) that's controlling it. I'm sure bearer should be able to capture SCM signal, otherwise, I'll never know from log when it was stopped. Thanks Andrea - Original Message - From: "Ian Daly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 7:46 PM Subject: RE: Log I think this is okay - I guess this is the difference between running it using cygrunsrv (as a service) and running it as a process? In the former case it would be the Windows SCM (Service Control Manager) that's controlling it. Ian > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bjoern Buettner > Sent: 25 February 2002 17:48 > To: Andrea Viscovich; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: AW: Log > > > I've used batch file to startup kannel on Win23 > run bearerbox.exe -v 1 smskannel.conf in Kannel root directory > > smskannel.conf > > core > ... > access-log = "access.log" > log-file = "kannel.log" > log-level = 0 > ... > > group = smsbox > ... > log-file = "smsbox.log" > log-level = 0 > access-log = "access.log" > ... > > following OUTput appears in the log $ screen: > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: Kannel bearerbox II version cvs starting > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: Started access logfile `access.log'. > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 1 > (gw/bb_store.c:store_cleanup) > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: HTTP: Opening server at port 13000. > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 2 (gwlib/fdset.c:poller) > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 3 > (gwlib/http.c:server_thread) > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 4 > (gw/bb_http.c:httpadmin_run) > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: starting smsbox connection module > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 5 > (gw/bb_boxc.c:smsboxc_run) > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 6 > (gw/smsc_fake.c:fake_listener) > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 7 > (gw/bb_smscconn.c:sms_router) > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [7] DEBUG: sms_router: time to sleep > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: Loading store file kannel.store > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: Store-file size 0, starting to unpack > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: Retrieved 0 messages, non-acknowledged > messages: 0 > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: MAIN: Start-up done, entering mainloop > . > > by pressing CTRL-C > > U see in the log & screen: > > 2002-02-25 17:35:24 [0] DEBUG: Shutting down Kannel... > 2002-02-25 17:35:24 [0] DEBUG: shutting down smsc > 2002-02-25 17:35:24 [0] DEBUG: shutting down udp > 2002-02-25 17:35:24 [1] DEBUG: Dumping 0 messages and 0 acks to store > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [1] DEBUG: Thread 1 (gw/bb_store.c:store_cleanup) > terminates > . > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [6] DEBUG: Thread 6 (gw/smsc_fake.c:fake_listener) > terminate > s. > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [5] ERROR: wait_for_connections failed > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [7] DEBUG: Thread 7 (gw/bb_smscconn.c:sms_router) > terminates > . > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] INFO: All flow threads have died, killing core > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: Waiting for 3 > (gwlib/http.c:server_thread) to > ter > minate > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [5] DEBUG: Thread 5 (gw/bb_boxc.c:smsboxc_run) > terminates. > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [2] WARNING: gwthread_sleep: error in poll > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [4] DEBUG: HTTP: No clients with > requests, quitting. > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [4] DEBUG: Thread 4 (gw/bb_http.c:httpadmin_run) > terminates. > > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [3] DEBUG: Thread 3 (gwlib/http.c:server_thread) > terminates. > > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [2] DEBUG: Thread 2 > (gwlib/fdset.c:poller) terminates. > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: final clean-up for SMSCConn > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] INFO: Total WDP messages: received 0, sent 0 > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] INFO: Total SMS messages: received 0, sent 0 > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: Immutable octet strings: 135. > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: Current allocations: 0 areas, 0 bytes > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: Highest number of allocations: > 818 areas > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: Highest memory usage: 41563 bytes > > > > Bjoern > > kind regards > > Vodafone TeleCommerce GmbH > Architecture & Engineering > Bjoern Buettner > Daniel Goldbach Str. 17-19 > 40880 Ratingen > > Tel. +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 20 13 > Fax +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 15 14 > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.vodafone.com > www.vodafone-telecommerce.de > > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Andrea Viscovich > > Gesendet: Montag, 25. Februar 2002 18:13 > > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Betreff: Log > > > > > > I would like to know what do you get in the log, > > (log-level 0) when stopping bearerbox and smsbox. > > In windows (at least in my NT4.0 enviroment) it > > seems it doesn't write anything, > > except in bearerbox.log > > [8] INFO: Connection closed by the box <127.0.0.1> > > > > But If I stop bearer I don't get any mess
Re: SMPP enquire_link and failover
At 09:24 AM 2/26/02 +0300, P. A. Bagyenda wrote: >Hi, > > I notice that the enquire_link message is sent every so often by the >SMPP code, but I don't seem to see anywhere that any errors are checked >for and used to update the list of SMSCs. This makes failover a bit of a >problem. Best attack point for fix, if this is a bug? This isnt a bug; the SMPP module will try to reconnect if it loses connectivity. The bearerbox routing will not route messages to a SMSC module that is down. So by using smsc-ids and multiple connections to different SMSCs you can build redundancy. I personally would like to see better info passed back to smsbox from the bearerbox modules; eg ".Cannot find SMSCConn for message to <27834151519>, rejected" - maybe as a DLR. nisan Nisan >Paul.
Re: General Question
>Hi guys, > >Have you all guys, a general status about phones that works with Kannel (as >client not SMSC)? yes, all phones which support SMS today. This is 99.999% of the GSM phones. Even my oldest phone back in 1992 did support GSM SMS. >I've noticed that some phones have some trouble, ex. Siemens S35. (UP >Browser > WAP) WAP is a completely different story. Using WAP, there's no SMSC involved. >I've also noticed that some OTA configuration will not work. (Siemens S35 ) >Nokia do not recieve any OTA mesg. . Thats even another different story as those are binary messages and they are module dependent. -- Andreas Fink Fink-Consulting -- Tel: +41-61-6932730 Fax: +41-61-6932729 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 Address: A. Fink, Schwarzwaldallee 16, 4058 Basel, Switzerland E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.finkconsulting.com -- Something urgent? Try http://www.smsrelay.com/ Nickname afink
SMPP enquire_link and failover
Hi, I notice that the enquire_link message is sent every so often by the SMPP code, but I don't seem to see anywhere that any errors are checked for and used to update the list of SMSCs. This makes failover a bit of a problem. Best attack point for fix, if this is a bug? Paul.
Re: ems sendsms sample
EMS is a ETSI/3GPP standard Check document 23040 at ftp://ftp.3gpp.org/Specs/latest/Rel-5/23_series/23040-520.zip BTW, for the list: Documentation refers that to send a big image, we have to send several small images (the image goes on UDH and have a limit of 32x32). Then, it says that if the images are near oneanother, the mobile should join they has one single big image (maximum 3 x 2, making an image of 92 x 64). My T39 shows several small images. It's like a big image, you can't see any space between them, but when trying to save, I could only save each small image. Any experiences ? - Original Message - From: Patrick Mignott To: 'Kannel' Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 6:31 PM Subject: ems sendsms sample i have had the this list has gone in detail about EMS standard with Kannel but i have not been able to find any example showing how to send a ringtone, icon using sendsms, i have only found nokia stuff, could some be so kind to send me a sample to EMS or Motorola sample of how to send a ringtone-icon? that relates to Kannel.
Re: Help ME !!!
Which version are you using and could you send the bearerbox_error.log for that part ? The MT missing is strange, but the "Empty sender field" could be an anonymous user (I'm worried, one local operator permits anonymous users and I don't know how would kannel behave) - Original Message - From: "Avner Sternheim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 1:57 PM Subject: Help ME !!! > I'm having problem with the kannel, I sending messages and after a few > it crash and i get these messages: > > 2002-02-17 19:40:59 [6] WARNING: emi2: required field MT missing > 2002-02-17 19:40:59 [6] WARNING: Empty sender field in received message > 2002-02-17 19:40:59 [6] PANIC: gwlib/octstr.c:2031: seems_valid_real: > Assertion `ostr != NULL' failed. (Called from gw/bb_smscconn.c:65:log_sms.) > > it seems that it happen only when i send data message via mobile phone > > can anyone help me > > > >
Re: timeout
This is a bug, I've been hit by it, but I still can't reproduce it. I have it too with a 500 server error from a IIS, and once I suspected it could be that, instead of the , I receive an empty page. Might be something related with the combination of the headers and the empty page. Some Content-Lenght ? Still one msgdata = NULL ? - Original Message - From: "Andrea Viscovich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:53 PM Subject: Re: timeout > > > Is there a way to not close connection? > > > > this depends on the HTTP/1.1 protocol I guess. I'm not aware how it's > > defined there, and I to busy to look for it, but I may assume that > > Keep-Alive connections to the HTTP server are used to be dropped if a > > class 500 reply is received. > > Well, do you think there is some type of configuration on IIs to do? > > > > > But, I think you mean more the issue that smsbox drops connection to > > bearerbox?! At least I assume this because of your log I see here. > > This means you *are* getting a reply. You are getting a class 500 HTTP > > reply, which means something with your dynamical goodies (cgi, php, > > servlet or whatever) on your HTTP server is broken for the request. > > > No, it means it had an 113 asp error, id est there was a timeout. > By the way you are right, smsbox gets the answer, and the answer is > error 500 asp error 113 etc. > > > Can anyone from the list confirm that Kannel's smsbox is *always* > > getting this assertion panic if it gets a HTTP 500 reply? > > > > If yes, then we have a bug here. > > It should as I haven't modified any source code. > Andrea > > > >
Re: Kannel Development
- Original Message - From: "Andreas Fink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 1:16 AM Subject: Re: Kannel Development > >>yes. I'm sending a few million SMS through it every month. > > > >I would be pushing close to this number every day. Can it still handle the > >load? :) > > 1 million SMS per day spread equally over 8 hours of a day is > 34msg/sec. No doubt Kannel can handle that. > > The question is more like if your SMSC can stand the load (they are > usually limited in throughput licensing) or your applications behind > the whole thing. Kannel will most probably go far beyound what your > SMSC connection does. We've tested Kannel with our own quick & dirty > SMPP to HTTP converter and where looping the system to itself > (smsbox->bearerbox->smpp2http->smsbox...) and we reached something > like 50msg/sec at CPU loads of 0.1. We estimated that with the 500MHz > Sparc CPU we used we could easily go to 500msg/sec and more if our > smpp2http would have run asynchronously (it wasnt replying until the > http post was completed). I've sent 59 msg/sec (50 + 5 + 2 + 1 + 1) one day through emi2, with no problem at all (well, except that I had checking malloc and if I don't limit the http connections, store.lock would grow and crash kannel, but I didn't had time to recompile kannel with malloc=native) I guess I had some luck that day (for the 50 msg/sec) or else too less time to send the messages in time (210k in almost 1 hour)
Re: SMPP throttling
I've done spam^H^H^H^Hmarketing with something like this:
a text file with one msisdn per line
send.pl (which you can cancel and restart at the last number):
#!/usr/bin/perl
$|=1;
$file=shift;
$command=shift;
$last="";
if( -e "$file.lock") {
open(X, "$file.lock");
$last=;
chop($last);
close(X);
print "Restarting at $last\n";
$start=0;
} else {
$start=1;
}
open(X, "$file");
$i=0;
foreach $line () {
$i++;
chop($line);
if($start == 0) {
print "Skipping $i - $line \r";
if($line eq $last) {
$start=1;
}
#sleep(1);
next;
}
print "Sending $i - $line \r";
`$command $line`;
if ( $i % 20 == 0) {
sleep(1);
}
#sleep(1);
open(X, ">$file.lock");
print X "$line\n";
close(X);
}
command:
#!/bin/bash
lynx -source -dump
'http://localhost:13013/sendsms?user=user&pass=pass&from=12345&&text=somethi
ng&to='$1
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Flax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bruno David Rodrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 3:17 AM
Subject: Re: SMPP throttling
> Yeah - thanks ... I actually meant 'what is a method to send many requests
> to smsbox all at once to test it'
>
> It seems the utility in gateway/test/test_http is the best for doing this!
>
> On 26 February 2002, Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
> > Use more than one smsbox if necessary and disable checking malloc
> > to allow the store.lock file to grow if necessary
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Matthew Flax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "gatewayZgalore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 6:46 AM
> > Subject: SMPP throttling
> >
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I was wondering do people throttle SMPP using aysnc HTTP requests ?
> > > If so then can smsbox handle this ?
> > >
> > > Also what are the best messages per second bandwidth ? Can it handle
450
> > > SMSs per second ?
> > >
> > > thanks alot
> > > --
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > For electronic musicians ...
> > > Vector Bass : http://mffmvectorbass.sourceforge.net/
> > > For developers ...
> > > TimeScale Audio Mod : http://mffmtimescale.sourceforge.net/
> > > Multimedia Time Code : http://mffmtimecode.sourceforge.net/
> > > 3D Audio Library : http://mffm3daudiolib.sourceforge.net/
> > >
> > >
>
> --
> Matt
>
> For electronic musicians ...
> Vector Bass : http://mffmvectorbass.sourceforge.net/
> For developers ...
> TimeScale Audio Mod : http://mffmtimescale.sourceforge.net/
> Multimedia Time Code : http://mffmtimecode.sourceforge.net/
> 3D Audio Library : http://mffm3daudiolib.sourceforge.net/
>
irc.openprojects.net
If anyone's interested and still remember what is IRC ;), I'll try to stay around in #kannel on irc.openprojects.net
Re: SMPP throttling
Yeah - thanks ... I actually meant 'what is a method to send many requests to smsbox all at once to test it' It seems the utility in gateway/test/test_http is the best for doing this! On 26 February 2002, Bruno David Rodrigues wrote: > Use more than one smsbox if necessary and disable checking malloc > to allow the store.lock file to grow if necessary > > - Original Message - > From: "Matthew Flax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "gatewayZgalore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 6:46 AM > Subject: SMPP throttling > > > > Hello, > > > > I was wondering do people throttle SMPP using aysnc HTTP requests ? > > If so then can smsbox handle this ? > > > > Also what are the best messages per second bandwidth ? Can it handle 450 > > SMSs per second ? > > > > thanks alot > > -- > > Matt > > > > For electronic musicians ... > > Vector Bass : http://mffmvectorbass.sourceforge.net/ > > For developers ... > > TimeScale Audio Mod : http://mffmtimescale.sourceforge.net/ > > Multimedia Time Code : http://mffmtimecode.sourceforge.net/ > > 3D Audio Library : http://mffm3daudiolib.sourceforge.net/ > > > > -- Matt For electronic musicians ... Vector Bass : http://mffmvectorbass.sourceforge.net/ For developers ... TimeScale Audio Mod : http://mffmtimescale.sourceforge.net/ Multimedia Time Code : http://mffmtimecode.sourceforge.net/ 3D Audio Library : http://mffm3daudiolib.sourceforge.net/
Re: [PATCH] SMS message center support for AT2 module.
I've applied your patch (with some minor changes (*)) and will commit tomorrow morning (my cable modem doesn't allow cvs or else there's some bad routing) (*) I'm using Octstr instead of that temp[500], added the configuration reading and, acording to the standard (and my ericsson said the same), it misses the quotas It's AT+CSCA="number" Could please others try it using an international number, to see if it's necessary to add the ",145" to the end when we have a "+"? - Original Message - From: "Oded Arbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kannel-devel (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:33 AM Subject: [PATCH] SMS message center support for AT2 module. Hi list. Sorry for the onslaught of patches ;-) I just want to get this out of the door. I needed to change the SMS message center setting of the SIM card, and really didn't feel like going into minicom and start to play with AT commands. so in a typical bout of "programmer-think", I hacked Kannel to do this for me... The change is minimal, tested and "Works For Me(tm)" on our wavecom test platform, but as usual - YMMV. Patch attached (this time, I swear :-) Oded Arbel m-Wise Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "My ambition is handicapped by laziness." -- Bukowskis Alter Ego Henry Chinaski in "Factotum" <>
Re: SMPP throttling
Use more than one smsbox if necessary and disable checking malloc to allow the store.lock file to grow if necessary - Original Message - From: "Matthew Flax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "gatewayZgalore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 6:46 AM Subject: SMPP throttling > Hello, > > I was wondering do people throttle SMPP using aysnc HTTP requests ? > If so then can smsbox handle this ? > > Also what are the best messages per second bandwidth ? Can it handle 450 > SMSs per second ? > > thanks alot > -- > Matt > > For electronic musicians ... > Vector Bass : http://mffmvectorbass.sourceforge.net/ > For developers ... > TimeScale Audio Mod : http://mffmtimescale.sourceforge.net/ > Multimedia Time Code : http://mffmtimecode.sourceforge.net/ > 3D Audio Library : http://mffm3daudiolib.sourceforge.net/ > >
ETSI docs and AT
I've seen that +CMT is defined on 07.05 (or the new one, 27005 at ftp://ftp.3gpp.org/Specs/latest/Rel-4/27_series/27005-410.zip) but where's defined the +AFC ?!?! (I hate the information organization of 3gpp.org)
Ericsson T68 as SMSC
Oh great.
Could we remove every smsc_at* to protest to the
manufacturers that don't follow the
standards ?
(and then we could get some cheap ss7 cards and do
a new smsc code :))
So, first tests (and already
disapointed)
Context:
I'm using now (it's late at night) a cygwin version
on my laptop and Windows XP, and a bluethoth card
(Windows XP only recognize MY 6210 through IrDA
:((( )
A. I've added
{ "ericssont68",
"AT+IFC=2,2" , 9600 ,
"AT+CNMI=3,3,0,0", "T68", NULL, 0, 0, 1, 1,
1, 0.1 }to smsc_at2.c.
AT+CNMI=3,2,0,0 doesn't work.
1. Text message with less than 160 chars,
ok.
2. Sending a flash message with and without alt-dcs
(DCS=10 or DCS=F0)
2002-02-26 01:27:26 [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS9]:
--> 001100098119494002F70010A7056F76381E072002-02-26 01:27:54 [6] DEBUG:
AT2[/dev/ttyS9]: --> 001100098119494002F700F0A7056F76381E07
Sends ok, but my nokia receives it as a normal SMS.
(ericsson eats the dcs ?)
3. Receiving SMS
2002-02-26 01:25:32 [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS9]:
<-- +CMT: 302002-02-26 01:25:32 [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS9]:
<--079153961616240C91539191042470202062105213000331D90C2002-02-26 01:25:32 [6] ERROR: AT2[/dev/ttyS9]: got +CMT but
pdu_extract failed
Where's the coma in CMT ?!?!?!
B. Now, with +CNMI=3,1,0,0
2002-02-26 01:59:06 [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS9]:
<-- +CMTI: "ME",272002-02-26 01:59:08 [6] ERROR: AT2[/dev/ttyS9]: got
+CMT but waiting for next line timed out
Uhmm.. right. the "1" says that the message goes to
Mobile Memory and we need Matt's patch.
But kannel shouldn't interpret CMTI as a CMT
anyway.
Could you please tell me the state of Matt's patch
(or the new one from Odded) so I could help them ?
more news tomorrow.
[FWI] Patch
I've commited to cvs some fixes to my last patch and additionally: pid argument to http url, to set the PID field and enable sending SIM Toolkit messages &pid=127&coding=2&alt-dcs=1&mclass=3. Now have fun creating your text and udh fields :P (implemented in emi2 and at2) alt-dcs argument to http url, to switch to the alternate coding of DCS, thus fixing the "flash message to old mobiles (ericsson 688?)" problem (implemented in at2 and emi2) added my-number configuration to at2 smsc group, enabling this number in logs instead of the "1234" added a keepalive to at2, sending an AT to the modem and reconnecting to it if it fails (we could use this to check if the modem still have GSM network, I don't know how now)
AW: Log
> current cvs or what version? I'm using Kannel-1.1.x-cvs, the new pre-compiled installation package. It was posted by Stipe @ So 24.02.2002 15:09, you can download it from http://kannel.dev.wapme.net/dist/binaries/. Bjoern kind regards Vodafone TeleCommerce GmbH Architecture & Engineering Bjoern Buettner Daniel Goldbach Str. 17-19 40880 Ratingen Tel. +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 20 13 Fax +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 15 14 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.vodafone.com www.vodafone-telecommerce.de > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Andrea Viscovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet: Montag, 25. Februar 2002 19:21 > An: Bjoern Buettner; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: Log > > > Thank, > > >I've used batch file to startup kannel on Win23 > > current cvs or what version? > > > by pressing CTRL-C... > > Well, pressing ctrl-c maybe send an SIGTERM signal. > By the way I'm even interested in knowing what happens to those > which run it as a service, not as a bat > Again many thanks > Andrea > > > > > - > This Mail has been checked for Viruses > Attention: Encrypted mails can NOT be checked! > > ** > > Diese Mail wurde auf Viren geprueft > Hinweis: Verschluesselte mails koennen NICHT auf Viren geprueft werden! > - >
Re: concatenation = true
I've tried the latest cvs and it works with emi2, so I guess there's no bug in smsbox code (the udh vs coding part). I've sent a long text message and a 3 sms picture message. - Original Message - From: "Angel Fradejas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "P. A. Bagyenda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 7:20 PM Subject: RE: concatenation = true Concatenated messages works for me, using current CVS. Never had a problem with that. Angel. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Stipe Tolj Enviado el: jueves 21 de febrero de 2002 20:19 CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; P. A. Bagyenda Asunto: Re: concatenation = true "P. A. Bagyenda" wrote: > > I'm still trying to figure out what's going wrong with the concatenation > = true. It doesn't work for text or binary, for the current snapshot. > I notice two interesting things: in access.log there is dump of each > message sent out, plus udh header. However I note that in each case, the > reported length is one greater than should be. For instance for the udh > it reports a length of 6, the message a length of 153. Is this part of > the problem? concatenated messages used to work?! Can you re-post the things you are seeing as mis-behaviour in a new mail with attached logs, so the developers could see. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: loadable modules ?
Or have a simple just-text smsbox and aditional smsbox modules to OTA, NSM, EMS, etc ;) - Original Message - From: "Bernino Lind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 7:53 AM Subject: RE: loadable modules ? Dear developers, Hope you enjoy your friday! If a such plan is underway, please have in mind to make the freeze of the CVS to have a stable branch. Im very thrilled to see this project moving into the module direction. This way I think we should consider to generalize the concept of modules and have well defined description of how to add/write a module to bearerbox with a generalist touch that modules should be capable of instanciating eachother in various ways. In this way a very fantastic complicated loadbalancing or routing would be possible, or some crazy horse might add an on the fly python interpreter as a module or...whatever. Looking at the increasing number of apache modules it seems like human creativity does not stop just because C programmers always make programs that leak memory ;-) I really appreciate this direction, -- med venlig hilsen / Best Regards Bernino Lind +45 7021 0050 catpipe Systems ApS - www.catpipe.net Best done *BSD solutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stipe Tolj Sent: 21. februar 2002 20:10 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: loadable modules ? Oded Arbel wrote: > > I think that would be very nice feature, and I see several things I can > do with it. > another revolutionary idea - wouldn't it be nice to load the smsc > modules as dynamic libraries ? that way we don't need to build smsc > modules that we're not going to use... yep, that brings us to 2 API architectures we should think about: 1) module API to load-on-the-fly smsc modules (smpp, emi2, at2, etc.) 2) module API to load-on-the-fly sms-services (so that there is no need to SIGHUP smsbox for processing) Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: SMSC support SL45i and T68
I've tried just now to send with a SL45 and I've used the siemens-tc35 I didn't check if it receives SL45 doesn't work with "siemens" modem type I haven't tried yet with T68, but I can do it (and probably will this evening) - Original Message - From: "Alexei Pashkovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Stone Zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 4:33 AM Subject: Re: SMSC support SL45i and T68 > You mean you could not RECEIVE the sms with those devices ? > I guess no sms was actually sent than. > Kannel sends pretty standard sms packet, so if your device usually gets any > sms messages, should be no problem to get one from kannel. > As regarding to driver support for those phones, I am not sure it is in > kannel already, but since both devices have AT modem internal and could be > connected with serial cable, fitting current AT to support them should not > be a problem. > > - Original Message - > From: "Stone Zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:04 AM > Subject: SMSC support SL45i and T68 > > > > hi, > > > > Just wonders does Kannel SMSC support SL45 and T68? > > > > I tried to send SMS via Nokia Premicell to SL45 and T68, but both failed. > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Stone > > > > > > > > NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER: > > This email (including attachments) is confidential. If you have received > > this email in error please notify the sender immediately and delete this > > email from your system without copying or disseminating it or placing any > > reliance upon its contents. We cannot accept liability for any breaches > of > > confidence arising through use of email. Any opinions expressed in this > > email (including attachments) are those of the author and do not > necessarily > > reflect our opinions. We will not accept responsibility for any > commitments > > made by our employees outside the scope of our business. We do not > warrant > > the accuracy or completeness of such information. > > > > > > > > >
Re: SMSC support SL45i and T68
You mean you could not RECEIVE the sms with those devices ? I guess no sms was actually sent than. Kannel sends pretty standard sms packet, so if your device usually gets any sms messages, should be no problem to get one from kannel. As regarding to driver support for those phones, I am not sure it is in kannel already, but since both devices have AT modem internal and could be connected with serial cable, fitting current AT to support them should not be a problem. - Original Message - From: "Stone Zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:04 AM Subject: SMSC support SL45i and T68 > hi, > > Just wonders does Kannel SMSC support SL45 and T68? > > I tried to send SMS via Nokia Premicell to SL45 and T68, but both failed. > > > Cheers > > Stone > > > > NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER: > This email (including attachments) is confidential. If you have received > this email in error please notify the sender immediately and delete this > email from your system without copying or disseminating it or placing any > reliance upon its contents. We cannot accept liability for any breaches of > confidence arising through use of email. Any opinions expressed in this > email (including attachments) are those of the author and do not necessarily > reflect our opinions. We will not accept responsibility for any commitments > made by our employees outside the scope of our business. We do not warrant > the accuracy or completeness of such information. > > >
SMSC support SL45i and T68
hi, Just wonders does Kannel SMSC support SL45 and T68? I tried to send SMS via Nokia Premicell to SL45 and T68, but both failed. Cheers Stone NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER: This email (including attachments) is confidential. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system without copying or disseminating it or placing any reliance upon its contents. We cannot accept liability for any breaches of confidence arising through use of email. Any opinions expressed in this email (including attachments) are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect our opinions. We will not accept responsibility for any commitments made by our employees outside the scope of our business. We do not warrant the accuracy or completeness of such information.
RE: Log
I think this is okay - I guess this is the difference between running it using cygrunsrv (as a service) and running it as a process? In the former case it would be the Windows SCM (Service Control Manager) that's controlling it. Ian > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bjoern Buettner > Sent: 25 February 2002 17:48 > To: Andrea Viscovich; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: AW: Log > > > I've used batch file to startup kannel on Win23 > run bearerbox.exe -v 1 smskannel.conf in Kannel root directory > > smskannel.conf > > core > ... > access-log = "access.log" > log-file = "kannel.log" > log-level = 0 > ... > > group = smsbox > ... > log-file = "smsbox.log" > log-level = 0 > access-log = "access.log" > ... > > following OUTput appears in the log $ screen: > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: Kannel bearerbox II version cvs starting > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: Started access logfile `access.log'. > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 1 > (gw/bb_store.c:store_cleanup) > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: HTTP: Opening server at port 13000. > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 2 (gwlib/fdset.c:poller) > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 3 > (gwlib/http.c:server_thread) > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 4 > (gw/bb_http.c:httpadmin_run) > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: starting smsbox connection module > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 5 > (gw/bb_boxc.c:smsboxc_run) > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 6 > (gw/smsc_fake.c:fake_listener) > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 7 > (gw/bb_smscconn.c:sms_router) > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [7] DEBUG: sms_router: time to sleep > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: Loading store file kannel.store > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: Store-file size 0, starting to unpack > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: Retrieved 0 messages, non-acknowledged > messages: 0 > 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: MAIN: Start-up done, entering mainloop > . > > by pressing CTRL-C > > U see in the log & screen: > > 2002-02-25 17:35:24 [0] DEBUG: Shutting down Kannel... > 2002-02-25 17:35:24 [0] DEBUG: shutting down smsc > 2002-02-25 17:35:24 [0] DEBUG: shutting down udp > 2002-02-25 17:35:24 [1] DEBUG: Dumping 0 messages and 0 acks to store > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [1] DEBUG: Thread 1 (gw/bb_store.c:store_cleanup) > terminates > . > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [6] DEBUG: Thread 6 (gw/smsc_fake.c:fake_listener) > terminate > s. > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [5] ERROR: wait_for_connections failed > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [7] DEBUG: Thread 7 (gw/bb_smscconn.c:sms_router) > terminates > . > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] INFO: All flow threads have died, killing core > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: Waiting for 3 > (gwlib/http.c:server_thread) to > ter > minate > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [5] DEBUG: Thread 5 (gw/bb_boxc.c:smsboxc_run) > terminates. > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [2] WARNING: gwthread_sleep: error in poll > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [4] DEBUG: HTTP: No clients with > requests, quitting. > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [4] DEBUG: Thread 4 (gw/bb_http.c:httpadmin_run) > terminates. > > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [3] DEBUG: Thread 3 (gwlib/http.c:server_thread) > terminates. > > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [2] DEBUG: Thread 2 > (gwlib/fdset.c:poller) terminates. > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: final clean-up for SMSCConn > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] INFO: Total WDP messages: received 0, sent 0 > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] INFO: Total SMS messages: received 0, sent 0 > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: Immutable octet strings: 135. > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: Current allocations: 0 areas, 0 bytes > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: Highest number of allocations: > 818 areas > 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: Highest memory usage: 41563 bytes > > > > Bjoern > > kind regards > > Vodafone TeleCommerce GmbH > Architecture & Engineering > Bjoern Buettner > Daniel Goldbach Str. 17-19 > 40880 Ratingen > > Tel. +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 20 13 > Fax +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 15 14 > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.vodafone.com > www.vodafone-telecommerce.de > > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Andrea Viscovich > > Gesendet: Montag, 25. Februar 2002 18:13 > > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Betreff: Log > > > > > > I would like to know what do you get in the log, > > (log-level 0) when stopping bearerbox and smsbox. > > In windows (at least in my NT4.0 enviroment) it > > seems it doesn't write anything, > > except in bearerbox.log > > [8] INFO: Connection closed by the box <127.0.0.1> > > > > But If I stop bearer I don't get any message. > > Looking at bearerbox.c seems that with every signal > > it should write something. So I don't understand > > which signal I give stopping it :-) > > Andrea > > > > > > > > > > - > > This Mail has been checked for Viruses > > Attention: Encrypted mails can NOT be checked! > > > > ** > > > > Diese Mail wurde auf V
Re: Log
Thank, >I've used batch file to startup kannel on Win23 current cvs or what version? > by pressing CTRL-C... Well, pressing ctrl-c maybe send an SIGTERM signal. By the way I'm even interested in knowing what happens to those which run it as a service, not as a bat Again many thanks Andrea
AW: Webmin Module
No, sorry, I mean, Philippe Barnetche has written a module for Kannel (located @ http://www.kannel.3glab.org/addons.shtml) Unfortunately is the link to "http://www.agisphere.com"; dead. Thanx Bjoern kind regards Vodafone TeleCommerce GmbH Architecture & Engineering Bjoern Buettner Daniel Goldbach Str. 17-19 40880 Ratingen Tel. +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 20 13 Fax +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 15 14 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.vodafone.com www.vodafone-telecommerce.de > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Alexei Pashkovsky > Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Februar 2002 03:53 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: Webmin Module > > > you mean this one ? > http://www.webmin.com/webmin/modules.html > > - Original Message - > From: "Bjoern Buettner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:57 AM > Subject: Webmin Module > > > > Hi all, > > > > has anybody the new URL of Philippe Barnetche's Webmin module Page? > > Or has anybody the mod.? > > This site is not available > > (http://www.agisphere.com/~barnetch/webkannel.html) > > > > I want to have a look @ the module. > > > > Thanx > > > > Bjoern > > > > kind regards > > > > Vodafone TeleCommerce GmbH > > Architecture & Engineering > > Bjoern Buettner > > Daniel Goldbach Str. 17-19 > > 40880 Ratingen > > > > Tel. +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 20 13 > > Fax +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 15 14 > > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > www.vodafone.com > > www.vodafone-telecommerce.de > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > This Mail has been checked for Viruses > Attention: Encrypted mails can NOT be checked! > > ** > > Diese Mail wurde auf Viren geprueft > Hinweis: Verschluesselte mails koennen NICHT auf Viren geprueft werden! > - >
Re: Webmin Module
you mean this one ? http://www.webmin.com/webmin/modules.html - Original Message - From: "Bjoern Buettner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:57 AM Subject: Webmin Module > Hi all, > > has anybody the new URL of Philippe Barnetche's Webmin module Page? > Or has anybody the mod.? > This site is not available > (http://www.agisphere.com/~barnetch/webkannel.html) > > I want to have a look @ the module. > > Thanx > > Bjoern > > kind regards > > Vodafone TeleCommerce GmbH > Architecture & Engineering > Bjoern Buettner > Daniel Goldbach Str. 17-19 > 40880 Ratingen > > Tel. +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 20 13 > Fax +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 15 14 > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.vodafone.com > www.vodafone-telecommerce.de > > > >
AW: Log
I've used batch file to startup kannel on Win23 run bearerbox.exe -v 1 smskannel.conf in Kannel root directory smskannel.conf core ... access-log = "access.log" log-file = "kannel.log" log-level = 0 ... group = smsbox ... log-file = "smsbox.log" log-level = 0 access-log = "access.log" ... following OUTput appears in the log $ screen: 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: Kannel bearerbox II version cvs starting 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: Started access logfile `access.log'. 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 1 (gw/bb_store.c:store_cleanup) 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: HTTP: Opening server at port 13000. 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 2 (gwlib/fdset.c:poller) 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 3 (gwlib/http.c:server_thread) 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 4 (gw/bb_http.c:httpadmin_run) 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: starting smsbox connection module 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 5 (gw/bb_boxc.c:smsboxc_run) 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 6 (gw/smsc_fake.c:fake_listener) 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 7 (gw/bb_smscconn.c:sms_router) 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [7] DEBUG: sms_router: time to sleep 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: Loading store file kannel.store 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: Store-file size 0, starting to unpack 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: Retrieved 0 messages, non-acknowledged messages: 0 2002-02-25 17:35:21 [0] INFO: MAIN: Start-up done, entering mainloop . by pressing CTRL-C U see in the log & screen: 2002-02-25 17:35:24 [0] DEBUG: Shutting down Kannel... 2002-02-25 17:35:24 [0] DEBUG: shutting down smsc 2002-02-25 17:35:24 [0] DEBUG: shutting down udp 2002-02-25 17:35:24 [1] DEBUG: Dumping 0 messages and 0 acks to store 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [1] DEBUG: Thread 1 (gw/bb_store.c:store_cleanup) terminates . 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [6] DEBUG: Thread 6 (gw/smsc_fake.c:fake_listener) terminate s. 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [5] ERROR: wait_for_connections failed 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [7] DEBUG: Thread 7 (gw/bb_smscconn.c:sms_router) terminates . 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] INFO: All flow threads have died, killing core 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: Waiting for 3 (gwlib/http.c:server_thread) to ter minate 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [5] DEBUG: Thread 5 (gw/bb_boxc.c:smsboxc_run) terminates. 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [2] WARNING: gwthread_sleep: error in poll 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [4] DEBUG: HTTP: No clients with requests, quitting. 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [4] DEBUG: Thread 4 (gw/bb_http.c:httpadmin_run) terminates. 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [3] DEBUG: Thread 3 (gwlib/http.c:server_thread) terminates. 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [2] DEBUG: Thread 2 (gwlib/fdset.c:poller) terminates. 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: final clean-up for SMSCConn 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] INFO: Total WDP messages: received 0, sent 0 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] INFO: Total SMS messages: received 0, sent 0 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: Immutable octet strings: 135. 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: Current allocations: 0 areas, 0 bytes 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: Highest number of allocations: 818 areas 2002-02-25 17:35:25 [0] DEBUG: Highest memory usage: 41563 bytes Bjoern kind regards Vodafone TeleCommerce GmbH Architecture & Engineering Bjoern Buettner Daniel Goldbach Str. 17-19 40880 Ratingen Tel. +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 20 13 Fax +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 15 14 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.vodafone.com www.vodafone-telecommerce.de > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Andrea Viscovich > Gesendet: Montag, 25. Februar 2002 18:13 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Log > > > I would like to know what do you get in the log, > (log-level 0) when stopping bearerbox and smsbox. > In windows (at least in my NT4.0 enviroment) it > seems it doesn't write anything, > except in bearerbox.log > [8] INFO: Connection closed by the box <127.0.0.1> > > But If I stop bearer I don't get any message. > Looking at bearerbox.c seems that with every signal > it should write something. So I don't understand > which signal I give stopping it :-) > Andrea > > > > > - > This Mail has been checked for Viruses > Attention: Encrypted mails can NOT be checked! > > ** > > Diese Mail wurde auf Viren geprueft > Hinweis: Verschluesselte mails koennen NICHT auf Viren geprueft werden! > - >
Log
I would like to know what do you get in the log, (log-level 0) when stopping bearerbox and smsbox. In windows (at least in my NT4.0 enviroment) it seems it doesn't write anything, except in bearerbox.log [8] INFO: Connection closed by the box <127.0.0.1> But If I stop bearer I don't get any message. Looking at bearerbox.c seems that with every signal it should write something. So I don't understand which signal I give stopping it :-) Andrea
Webmin Module
Hi all, has anybody the new URL of Philippe Barnetche's Webmin module Page? Or has anybody the mod.? This site is not available (http://www.agisphere.com/~barnetch/webkannel.html) I want to have a look @ the module. Thanx Bjoern kind regards Vodafone TeleCommerce GmbH Architecture & Engineering Bjoern Buettner Daniel Goldbach Str. 17-19 40880 Ratingen Tel. +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 20 13 Fax +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 15 14 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.vodafone.com www.vodafone-telecommerce.de
Re: Signal handling
- Original Message - From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 2:01 PM Subject: Re: Signal handling > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I would like to undesrtand signal handling > > in bearer and smsbox > > I found that the only difference is that smsbox doesn't > > handle SIGTERM, instead bearerbox does handle it. > > I would like to take it away from bearerbox. > > This because In WiNT I think that runnin bearer as a service > > has a problem when stopping it, caused by SIGTERM. > > AFAIK, I haven't seen any problems with cygrunsrv. Please describe > what's the problem about it. > Here is the problem: I do cygrunsrv -E bearerbox and I got an error 1053 after few minutes. it's a timeout, application didnt answer etc. And of course bearer is still an active task. I now recompiled it, commenting out SIGTERM, in bearerbox.c (see below) and now it works. By the way when I stop the service I don't see anything in the log, maybe I should add some info() somewhere. I'm really surprised as you tell me it works. I tried in WINNT 4.0 sp6, W2K professional, cygrunsrv 094-2, cygwin1.dll 1.3.9 (latest) Bye Andrea
Re: New Stable release
of course if the patch takes too long to be done and tested, we should do it only after releasing a stable version ;) - Original Message - From: "Alexei Pashkovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:49 PM Subject: Re: New Stable release Sure we can, someone has to merge two things and add config variable , than we have to test it for a few weeks .. are you sure thats what you want ? - Original Message - From: "Bruno David Rodrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Alexei Pashkovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:43 AM Subject: Re: New Stable release > Cant we have it configurable in ./configure or config file to choose between > direct, sim card or phone memory has I suggested before ? > > > - Original Message - > From: "Alexei Pashkovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:40 PM > Subject: Re: New Stable release > > > As regarding to SIM buffering patches : > I don't think these are to be included in any type of stable version, and > there's a very simple and clear reason. > Sim card has flash memory where it stores those messages if they are not > requested to be output to the prompt by terminal. > Every flash memory card has it's life circle , which is pretty short > comparing to count of messages one would want to receive/send with it in > production environment. > Let's say normal Sim will not live if you save to it over 10.000 - 50.000 > sms. > While 10.000 seems to be a huge number, it is not actually that big, and > in production environments I personally saw a sim card which received over > 100.000 sms. > This would not be possible if it would be over the "Sim buffering" technics, > the card would simply go screwed. > So far, I suppose this buffering conception is for risky people only, and we > definately would not want to include in stable release something that could > damage user's hardware. > > - Original Message - > From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:19 AM > Subject: Re: New Stable release > > > > Oded Arbel wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm not absolutly sure we don't need AT anymore, but I think it would > > > probably be a good idea. if we need something that only AT does (nothing > > > AFAIK) we can always grab it from the CVS. > > > what about the SIM buffering patches - do you think these should be > > > merged in the old/new AT module ? > > > > I haven't reviewed them and I'm out of time scope until next Sunday. > > > > If anyone other can suggest in merging the patch in please take your > > heads up on the list and present your review results and tell us how > > far you have tested it. > > > > Stipe > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- > > Wapme Systems AG > > > > Münsterstr. 248 > > 40470 Düsseldorf > > > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > > --- > > wapme.net - wherever you are > > > > > > > > >
RE: last CVS updates
Hi all, Just to let you know, I have been using this default-sender functionality in our production environment for three months now, with a (I think) respectable traffic (8+ MO per day) , and 16 SMS-C connections (smpp, emi2, and custom drivers). No problems 'till now. BTW, sorry for the missing ocstr_destroy, it were called only once at smsbox exit, so memory was not growing and I didn't see it. Angel Fradejas. -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Oded Arbel Enviado el: lunes 25 de febrero de 2002 14:20 Para: Stipe Tolj CC: Kannel-devel (E-mail) Asunto: RE: last CVS updates > -Original Message- > From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:10 PM > Cc: Kannel-devel (E-mail); Nick Clarey; David Holland > Subject: Re: last CVS updates > > > Oded Arbel wrote: > > And while where here already - what about Angel's > default-sender patch ? > > will it go into CVS ? > > this depends on the pros and cons of the list. As long as there is no > consence in the list and there is no-one actually reviewing the patch > and stating that it is ok, I guess it is still scheduled. I'd really love to see it in - I tested it and I feel ok with it. it's not very important for me, but it does solve a minor issue we've been having. AFAIR, I haven't read anyone who said that the patch is broken (except for the missing octstr_destroy for which I submitted a patch). > At least I'm "blocked" for this week, after that I will engage all > point that are open. But please consider this not as "ok, then we'll > wait!". I'd rather see more activity from the cvs write permission > owner, otherwise we'll vote for adding users like you Oded to have > write permission and step on with development. Just my 2ct. I would like that :-) Oded Arbel m-Wise Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Too fucking busy, and vice versa. -- Dorothy Parker Reply to her editor who was bugging her for her belated work while she was on her honeymoon
RE: New Stable release
a) We can use configure switches to turn this behaviour on and off. the patches against at2 use #ifdefs to enable/disable them. I have tested it to work in a production environment with and without the the USE_SIM_BUFFERING define. b) The at2 patches were written to solve the problem of the SIM flash memory shor life span by only allowing writes to the flash memory when absolutly needed. under normal load no SM will ever be stored in memory. these changes only come into effect when under heavy load some messages lend in SIM memory. I regard the at2 patch to be completly safe and we have been using it in a production setting for almost two months now. Oded Arbel m-Wise Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion. You must set yourself on fire." -- Reggie Leach > -Original Message- > From: Bruno David Rodrigues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:43 PM > To: Alexei Pashkovsky > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: New Stable release > > > Cant we have it configurable in ./configure or config file to > choose between > direct, sim card or phone memory has I suggested before ? > > > - Original Message - > From: "Alexei Pashkovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:40 PM > Subject: Re: New Stable release > > > As regarding to SIM buffering patches : > I don't think these are to be included in any type of stable > version, and > there's a very simple and clear reason. > Sim card has flash memory where it stores those messages if > they are not > requested to be output to the prompt by terminal. > Every flash memory card has it's life circle , which is pretty short > comparing to count of messages one would want to receive/send > with it in > production environment. > Let's say normal Sim will not live if you save to it over > 10.000 - 50.000 > sms. > While 10.000 seems to be a huge number, it is not actually > that big, and > in production environments I personally saw a sim card which > received over > 100.000 sms. > This would not be possible if it would be over the "Sim > buffering" technics, > the card would simply go screwed. > So far, I suppose this buffering conception is for risky > people only, and we > definately would not want to include in stable release > something that could > damage user's hardware. > > - Original Message - > From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:19 AM > Subject: Re: New Stable release > > > > Oded Arbel wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm not absolutly sure we don't need AT anymore, but I > think it would > > > probably be a good idea. if we need something that only > AT does (nothing > > > AFAIK) we can always grab it from the CVS. > > > what about the SIM buffering patches - do you think these > should be > > > merged in the old/new AT module ? > > > > I haven't reviewed them and I'm out of time scope until next Sunday. > > > > If anyone other can suggest in merging the patch in please take your > > heads up on the list and present your review results and tell us how > > far you have tested it. > > > > Stipe > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- > > Wapme Systems AG > > > > Münsterstr. 248 > > 40470 Düsseldorf > > > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > > --- > > wapme.net - wherever you are > > > > > > > > > >
Re: New Stable release
Yep, I would like it. My modem sometimes hangs (*) and the messages stay in sim card, so I don't mind having the messages going through the sim card or even if the messages go directly to kannel, kannel could read every message present in phone and sim when starting. (*) Can I do a keepalive function to AT, like sending an AT so if the modem hangs, kannel would reopen the connection ? - Original Message - From: "Alexei Pashkovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:49 PM Subject: Re: New Stable release Sure we can, someone has to merge two things and add config variable , than we have to test it for a few weeks .. are you sure thats what you want ? - Original Message - From: "Bruno David Rodrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Alexei Pashkovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:43 AM Subject: Re: New Stable release > Cant we have it configurable in ./configure or config file to choose between > direct, sim card or phone memory has I suggested before ? > > > - Original Message - > From: "Alexei Pashkovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:40 PM > Subject: Re: New Stable release > > > As regarding to SIM buffering patches : > I don't think these are to be included in any type of stable version, and > there's a very simple and clear reason. > Sim card has flash memory where it stores those messages if they are not > requested to be output to the prompt by terminal. > Every flash memory card has it's life circle , which is pretty short > comparing to count of messages one would want to receive/send with it in > production environment. > Let's say normal Sim will not live if you save to it over 10.000 - 50.000 > sms. > While 10.000 seems to be a huge number, it is not actually that big, and > in production environments I personally saw a sim card which received over > 100.000 sms. > This would not be possible if it would be over the "Sim buffering" technics, > the card would simply go screwed. > So far, I suppose this buffering conception is for risky people only, and we > definately would not want to include in stable release something that could > damage user's hardware. > > - Original Message - > From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:19 AM > Subject: Re: New Stable release > > > > Oded Arbel wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm not absolutly sure we don't need AT anymore, but I think it would > > > probably be a good idea. if we need something that only AT does (nothing > > > AFAIK) we can always grab it from the CVS. > > > what about the SIM buffering patches - do you think these should be > > > merged in the old/new AT module ? > > > > I haven't reviewed them and I'm out of time scope until next Sunday. > > > > If anyone other can suggest in merging the patch in please take your > > heads up on the list and present your review results and tell us how > > far you have tested it. > > > > Stipe > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- > > Wapme Systems AG > > > > Münsterstr. 248 > > 40470 Düsseldorf > > > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > > --- > > wapme.net - wherever you are > > > > > > > > >
Re: New Stable release
Sure we can, someone has to merge two things and add config variable , than we have to test it for a few weeks .. are you sure thats what you want ? - Original Message - From: "Bruno David Rodrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Alexei Pashkovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:43 AM Subject: Re: New Stable release > Cant we have it configurable in ./configure or config file to choose between > direct, sim card or phone memory has I suggested before ? > > > - Original Message - > From: "Alexei Pashkovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:40 PM > Subject: Re: New Stable release > > > As regarding to SIM buffering patches : > I don't think these are to be included in any type of stable version, and > there's a very simple and clear reason. > Sim card has flash memory where it stores those messages if they are not > requested to be output to the prompt by terminal. > Every flash memory card has it's life circle , which is pretty short > comparing to count of messages one would want to receive/send with it in > production environment. > Let's say normal Sim will not live if you save to it over 10.000 - 50.000 > sms. > While 10.000 seems to be a huge number, it is not actually that big, and > in production environments I personally saw a sim card which received over > 100.000 sms. > This would not be possible if it would be over the "Sim buffering" technics, > the card would simply go screwed. > So far, I suppose this buffering conception is for risky people only, and we > definately would not want to include in stable release something that could > damage user's hardware. > > - Original Message - > From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:19 AM > Subject: Re: New Stable release > > > > Oded Arbel wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm not absolutly sure we don't need AT anymore, but I think it would > > > probably be a good idea. if we need something that only AT does (nothing > > > AFAIK) we can always grab it from the CVS. > > > what about the SIM buffering patches - do you think these should be > > > merged in the old/new AT module ? > > > > I haven't reviewed them and I'm out of time scope until next Sunday. > > > > If anyone other can suggest in merging the patch in please take your > > heads up on the list and present your review results and tell us how > > far you have tested it. > > > > Stipe > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- > > Wapme Systems AG > > > > Münsterstr. 248 > > 40470 Düsseldorf > > > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > > --- > > wapme.net - wherever you are > > > > > > > > >
Re: last CVS updates
- Original Message - From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Kannel-devel (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Nick Clarey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "David Holland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:09 PM Subject: Re: last CVS updates > Oded Arbel wrote: > > > > Hi list. > > > > I was wandering - after updating from CVS today, I saw that all of a > > sudden, in cfg.def, the smsc group has the option 'appname' written > > twice - is that on purpose ? > > I see from > http://www.kannel.3glab.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gateway/gwlib/cfg.def > that this change was made by a user called "davi", Sat Feb 23 04:05:32 > 2002 UTC. > > And there is *no* ChangeLog entry for this commit : > > David, Nick, who is "davi"?? I would like to advice him about some > point regarding cvs. If you still don't know who this is I would like > to suggest to freeze the account! Davi it's me! Oh. Sorry. It was a mistype 'yyp' in vi when I created the reply. And sorry for the "int retry" warning too. I'll commit the correction now
Re: New Stable release
Cant we have it configurable in ./configure or config file to choose between direct, sim card or phone memory has I suggested before ? - Original Message - From: "Alexei Pashkovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:40 PM Subject: Re: New Stable release As regarding to SIM buffering patches : I don't think these are to be included in any type of stable version, and there's a very simple and clear reason. Sim card has flash memory where it stores those messages if they are not requested to be output to the prompt by terminal. Every flash memory card has it's life circle , which is pretty short comparing to count of messages one would want to receive/send with it in production environment. Let's say normal Sim will not live if you save to it over 10.000 - 50.000 sms. While 10.000 seems to be a huge number, it is not actually that big, and in production environments I personally saw a sim card which received over 100.000 sms. This would not be possible if it would be over the "Sim buffering" technics, the card would simply go screwed. So far, I suppose this buffering conception is for risky people only, and we definately would not want to include in stable release something that could damage user's hardware. - Original Message - From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:19 AM Subject: Re: New Stable release > Oded Arbel wrote: > > > > > > I'm not absolutly sure we don't need AT anymore, but I think it would > > probably be a good idea. if we need something that only AT does (nothing > > AFAIK) we can always grab it from the CVS. > > what about the SIM buffering patches - do you think these should be > > merged in the old/new AT module ? > > I haven't reviewed them and I'm out of time scope until next Sunday. > > If anyone other can suggest in merging the patch in please take your > heads up on the list and present your review results and tell us how > far you have tested it. > > Stipe > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- > Wapme Systems AG > > Münsterstr. 248 > 40470 Düsseldorf > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > --- > wapme.net - wherever you are > >
Re: New Stable release
As regarding to SIM buffering patches : I don't think these are to be included in any type of stable version, and there's a very simple and clear reason. Sim card has flash memory where it stores those messages if they are not requested to be output to the prompt by terminal. Every flash memory card has it's life circle , which is pretty short comparing to count of messages one would want to receive/send with it in production environment. Let's say normal Sim will not live if you save to it over 10.000 - 50.000 sms. While 10.000 seems to be a huge number, it is not actually that big, and in production environments I personally saw a sim card which received over 100.000 sms. This would not be possible if it would be over the "Sim buffering" technics, the card would simply go screwed. So far, I suppose this buffering conception is for risky people only, and we definately would not want to include in stable release something that could damage user's hardware. - Original Message - From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:19 AM Subject: Re: New Stable release > Oded Arbel wrote: > > > > > > I'm not absolutly sure we don't need AT anymore, but I think it would > > probably be a good idea. if we need something that only AT does (nothing > > AFAIK) we can always grab it from the CVS. > > what about the SIM buffering patches - do you think these should be > > merged in the old/new AT module ? > > I haven't reviewed them and I'm out of time scope until next Sunday. > > If anyone other can suggest in merging the patch in please take your > heads up on the list and present your review results and tell us how > far you have tested it. > > Stipe > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- > Wapme Systems AG > > Münsterstr. 248 > 40470 Düsseldorf > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > --- > wapme.net - wherever you are > >
[REQ] CeBIT 2002 Meeting
Ok, once again: I have asked in my previous mail with the subject "[REQ] Kannel developer's meeting at CeBIT 2002" for Kannel developers that are coming as company staff or antendees to CeBIT 2002 this year. We are enforcing to organize a "Kannel Developer's Meeting" while this event takes place. So please submit to me (in personal mail) all necessary data if you are willing to attend to the meeting. I have received only 2 submission for this yet! So please HEADS UP! Thanks in advance. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: New Stable release
Oded Arbel wrote: > > What's astyle ? I though the only thing to do is to define the right tab > width (what is the tab width for the C sources anyway ?). some parts of > the code look to me like the indenentation is random and optional.. see gateway/doc/CodingStyle. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
RE: New Stable release
What's astyle ? I though the only thing to do is to define the right tab width (what is the tab width for the C sources anyway ?). some parts of the code look to me like the indenentation is random and optional.. Oded Arbel m-Wise Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "It's not *you* that is the problem, it's all the other people on the net." -- Peter da Silva > -Original Message- > From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:13 PM > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: New Stable release > > > Alexei Pashkovsky wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > I think we should actually rename the AT2 to AT and forget the old > > AT before making the release. > > Anybody checking the last things and debugging before new stable > > version ? > > BTW, I would like to see that smsc_at2.c is C source harmonized to our > coding style rules using astyle or the other tool (I don't recall the > name at the moment :)). > > This should be also done for several other source files. > > What about using doxygen semantics to enable inline documenation? It's > realy simple and does not harm in any way the existing commentary? > > Stipe > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- > Wapme Systems AG > > Münsterstr. 248 > 40470 Düsseldorf > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > --- > wapme.net - wherever you are > >
RE: last CVS updates
> -Original Message- > From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:10 PM > Cc: Kannel-devel (E-mail); Nick Clarey; David Holland > Subject: Re: last CVS updates > > > Oded Arbel wrote: > > And while where here already - what about Angel's > default-sender patch ? > > will it go into CVS ? > > this depends on the pros and cons of the list. As long as there is no > consence in the list and there is no-one actually reviewing the patch > and stating that it is ok, I guess it is still scheduled. I'd really love to see it in - I tested it and I feel ok with it. it's not very important for me, but it does solve a minor issue we've been having. AFAIR, I haven't read anyone who said that the patch is broken (except for the missing octstr_destroy for which I submitted a patch). > At least I'm "blocked" for this week, after that I will engage all > point that are open. But please consider this not as "ok, then we'll > wait!". I'd rather see more activity from the cvs write permission > owner, otherwise we'll vote for adding users like you Oded to have > write permission and step on with development. Just my 2ct. I would like that :-) Oded Arbel m-Wise Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Too fucking busy, and vice versa. -- Dorothy Parker Reply to her editor who was bugging her for her belated work while she was on her honeymoon
Re: New Stable release
Oded Arbel wrote: > > > I'm not absolutly sure we don't need AT anymore, but I think it would > probably be a good idea. if we need something that only AT does (nothing > AFAIK) we can always grab it from the CVS. > what about the SIM buffering patches - do you think these should be > merged in the old/new AT module ? I haven't reviewed them and I'm out of time scope until next Sunday. If anyone other can suggest in merging the patch in please take your heads up on the list and present your review results and tell us how far you have tested it. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
RE: New Stable release
> -Original Message- > From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 3:00 PM > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: New Stable release > > > Alexei Pashkovsky wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > I think we should actually rename the AT2 to AT and forget the old > > AT before making the release. > > Anybody checking the last things and debugging before new stable > > version ? > > any votes for this suggestion? > > +1 from me. > > Stipe I'm not absolutly sure we don't need AT anymore, but I think it would probably be a good idea. if we need something that only AT does (nothing AFAIK) we can always grab it from the CVS. what about the SIM buffering patches - do you think these should be merged in the old/new AT module ? Oded Arbel m-Wise Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Whatever women do they must do twice as well as men to be thought half as good. Luckily, this is not difficult. -- Charlotte Whitton
Re: New Stable release
Alexei Pashkovsky wrote: > > Hi all, > I think we should actually rename the AT2 to AT and forget the old > AT before making the release. > Anybody checking the last things and debugging before new stable > version ? BTW, I would like to see that smsc_at2.c is C source harmonized to our coding style rules using astyle or the other tool (I don't recall the name at the moment :)). This should be also done for several other source files. What about using doxygen semantics to enable inline documenation? It's realy simple and does not harm in any way the existing commentary? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: New Stable release
>Alexei Pashkovsky wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> I think we should actually rename the AT2 to AT and forget the old >> AT before making the release. >> Anybody checking the last things and debugging before new stable >> version ? > >any votes for this suggestion? > >+1 from me. I'm for it too. Anyone still using old AT driver? -- Andreas Fink Fink-Consulting -- Tel: +41-61-6932730 Fax: +41-61-6932729 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 Address: A. Fink, Schwarzwaldallee 16, 4058 Basel, Switzerland E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.finkconsulting.com -- Something urgent? Try http://www.smsrelay.com/ Nickname afink
Re: last CVS updates
Oded Arbel wrote: > > Hi list. > > I was wandering - after updating from CVS today, I saw that all of a > sudden, in cfg.def, the smsc group has the option 'appname' written > twice - is that on purpose ? I see from http://www.kannel.3glab.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gateway/gwlib/cfg.def that this change was made by a user called "davi", Sat Feb 23 04:05:32 2002 UTC. And there is *no* ChangeLog entry for this commit : David, Nick, who is "davi"?? I would like to advice him about some point regarding cvs. If you still don't know who this is I would like to suggest to freeze the account! > And while where here already - what about Angel's default-sender patch ? > will it go into CVS ? this depends on the pros and cons of the list. As long as there is no consence in the list and there is no-one actually reviewing the patch and stating that it is ok, I guess it is still scheduled. At least I'm "blocked" for this week, after that I will engage all point that are open. But please consider this not as "ok, then we'll wait!". I'd rather see more activity from the cvs write permission owner, otherwise we'll vote for adding users like you Oded to have write permission and step on with development. Just my 2ct. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: Signal handling
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I would like to undesrtand signal handling > in bearer and smsbox > I found that the only difference is that smsbox doesn't > handle SIGTERM, instead bearerbox does handle it. > I would like to take it away from bearerbox. > This because In WiNT I think that runnin bearer as a service > has a problem when stopping it, caused by SIGTERM. AFAIK, I haven't seen any problems with cygrunsrv. Please describe what's the problem about it. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: accesskey problem
Hi dark, Richard Braakman wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Aarno Syvänen wrote: > > Perhaps you can help yourself ? Wml_definitions.h attributes and their > > token > > representation. You can add new ones here, and perhaps provide the patch > > to the > > list. > > Adding such a patch would break interoperability with WML1.1 clients, though. Yes. There are three things to be done here: a) WML compiler must recognize WML version. Prologue tell this, but currently WML1.1 is assumed. b) Ideally Kannel should not send 1.2 content to 1.1 phone. Profile header contains URL for a document telling what version UA supports. (If there are not any, 1.1 can be assumed.) c) Kannel should contain both 1.1 and 1.2 compilers (though main differance here is tokenization table). 1.1 compiler should *ignore* unknown tags, not pass them forward as strings. Aarno
Re: New Stable release
Alexei Pashkovsky wrote: > > Hi all, > I think we should actually rename the AT2 to AT and forget the old > AT before making the release. > Anybody checking the last things and debugging before new stable > version ? any votes for this suggestion? +1 from me. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
last CVS updates
Hi list. I was wandering - after updating from CVS today, I saw that all of a sudden, in cfg.def, the smsc group has the option 'appname' written twice - is that on purpose ? And while where here already - what about Angel's default-sender patch ? will it go into CVS ? Oded Arbel m-Wise Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- A sufficiently advanced programming error is indistinguishable from the Windows 95 operating system.
Signal handling
I would like to undesrtand signal handling in bearer and smsbox I found that the only difference is that smsbox doesn't handle SIGTERM, instead bearerbox does handle it. I would like to take it away from bearerbox. This because In WiNT I think that runnin bearer as a service has a problem when stopping it, caused by SIGTERM. Thanks Andrea Hi all, I think we should actually rename the AT2 to AT and forget the old AT before making the release. Anybody checking the last things and debugging before new stable version ?
New Stable release
Hi all, I think we should actually rename the AT2 to AT and forget the old AT before making the release. Anybody checking the last things and debugging before new stable version ?
