Re: Release plan

2010-09-13 Thread KangMas Willy
Hi,
At the user point of view. I think SQLBox is not ready yet, since it still 
contains bug on MO receiving with meta-data. I'm sure Alex is working on it.


sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/


On Sep 9, 2010, at 8:12 PM, Alexander Malysh wrote:

 Hi together,
 
 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, wtls 
 branch.
 
 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex: could 
 you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release with 
 Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?
 
 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether 
 somebody sees showstopper.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh




RE: Release plan

2010-09-13 Thread Rene Kluwen
Do you still encounter that problem? I have been trying to reproduce it, but
without any luck.

If you have pointers, please share.

== Rene


-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of KangMas Willy
Sent: Monday, 13 September, 2010 15:39
To: Alexander Malysh
Cc: Kannel Devel
Subject: Re: Release plan

Hi,
At the user point of view. I think SQLBox is not ready yet, since it still
contains bug on MO receiving with meta-data. I'm sure Alex is working on it.


sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/


On Sep 9, 2010, at 8:12 PM, Alexander Malysh wrote:

 Hi together,
 
 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, wtls
branch.
 
 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
could you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
with Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?
 
 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
somebody sees showstopper.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh







RE: Release plan

2010-09-13 Thread Rene Kluwen
By chance, you don't get any like the following message in log-level = 0?

MYSQL: Database pool got no connection! DB update failed!

Or something similar?

== Rene

-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of Rene Kluwen
Sent: Monday, 13 September, 2010 15:42
To: 'KangMas Willy'; 'Alexander Malysh'
Cc: 'Kannel Devel'
Subject: RE: Release plan

Do you still encounter that problem? I have been trying to reproduce it, but
without any luck.

If you have pointers, please share.

== Rene


-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of KangMas Willy
Sent: Monday, 13 September, 2010 15:39
To: Alexander Malysh
Cc: Kannel Devel
Subject: Re: Release plan

Hi,
At the user point of view. I think SQLBox is not ready yet, since it still
contains bug on MO receiving with meta-data. I'm sure Alex is working on it.


sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/


On Sep 9, 2010, at 8:12 PM, Alexander Malysh wrote:

 Hi together,
 
 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, wtls
branch.
 
 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
could you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
with Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?
 
 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
somebody sees showstopper.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh










Re: Release plan

2010-09-13 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
Yeah, me neither.

I've also tried to reproduce it on the weekend using latest Kannel's SVN and 
couldn't.

If you still experience the issue, please let us know the versions you use and 
I'll re-verify it.

Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
aguerri...@kannel.org



On 13/09/2010, at 15:42, Rene Kluwen wrote:

 Do you still encounter that problem? I have been trying to reproduce it, but
 without any luck.
 
 If you have pointers, please share.
 
 == Rene
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
 Of KangMas Willy
 Sent: Monday, 13 September, 2010 15:39
 To: Alexander Malysh
 Cc: Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan
 
 Hi,
 At the user point of view. I think SQLBox is not ready yet, since it still
 contains bug on MO receiving with meta-data. I'm sure Alex is working on it.
 
 
 sangprabv
 sangpr...@gmail.com
 http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/
 
 
 On Sep 9, 2010, at 8:12 PM, Alexander Malysh wrote:
 
 Hi together,
 
 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, wtls
 branch.
 
 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
 could you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
 with Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?
 
 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
 somebody sees showstopper.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh
 
 
 
 
 




Re: Release plan

2010-09-13 Thread Alexander Malysh
how do you store message body and udh in DB? hex?
I ask because you may have some errors due to the missing escaping?

And even sqlbox show errors, just make sure you send ACK to bearerbox _after_ 
successful insert into DB
and you will never lose MOs.

Thanks,
Alexander Malysh

Am 13.09.2010 um 15:48 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:

 Yeah, me neither.
 
 I've also tried to reproduce it on the weekend using latest Kannel's SVN and 
 couldn't.
 
 If you still experience the issue, please let us know the versions you use 
 and I'll re-verify it.
 
 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org
 
 
 
 On 13/09/2010, at 15:42, Rene Kluwen wrote:
 
 Do you still encounter that problem? I have been trying to reproduce it, but
 without any luck.
 
 If you have pointers, please share.
 
 == Rene
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
 Of KangMas Willy
 Sent: Monday, 13 September, 2010 15:39
 To: Alexander Malysh
 Cc: Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan
 
 Hi,
 At the user point of view. I think SQLBox is not ready yet, since it still
 contains bug on MO receiving with meta-data. I'm sure Alex is working on it.
 
 
 sangprabv
 sangpr...@gmail.com
 http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/
 
 
 On Sep 9, 2010, at 8:12 PM, Alexander Malysh wrote:
 
 Hi together,
 
 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, wtls
 branch.
 
 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
 could you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
 with Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?
 
 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
 somebody sees showstopper.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh
 
 
 
 
 
 




Re: Release plan

2010-09-13 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
I don't think that's the problem here. When the error happened, it didn't 
matter what kind of content you used. I've tried inserting a lot of identical 
messages (like Hello) and about 40-50% of them were lost.

Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
aguerri...@kannel.org



On 13/09/2010, at 16:00, Alexander Malysh wrote:

 how do you store message body and udh in DB? hex?
 I ask because you may have some errors due to the missing escaping?
 
 And even sqlbox show errors, just make sure you send ACK to bearerbox _after_ 
 successful insert into DB
 and you will never lose MOs.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh
 
 Am 13.09.2010 um 15:48 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:
 
 Yeah, me neither.
 
 I've also tried to reproduce it on the weekend using latest Kannel's SVN and 
 couldn't.
 
 If you still experience the issue, please let us know the versions you use 
 and I'll re-verify it.
 
 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org
 
 
 
 On 13/09/2010, at 15:42, Rene Kluwen wrote:
 
 Do you still encounter that problem? I have been trying to reproduce it, but
 without any luck.
 
 If you have pointers, please share.
 
 == Rene
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
 Of KangMas Willy
 Sent: Monday, 13 September, 2010 15:39
 To: Alexander Malysh
 Cc: Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan
 
 Hi,
 At the user point of view. I think SQLBox is not ready yet, since it still
 contains bug on MO receiving with meta-data. I'm sure Alex is working on it.
 
 
 sangprabv
 sangpr...@gmail.com
 http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/
 
 
 On Sep 9, 2010, at 8:12 PM, Alexander Malysh wrote:
 
 Hi together,
 
 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, wtls
 branch.
 
 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
 could you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
 with Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?
 
 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
 somebody sees showstopper.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




Re: Release plan

2010-09-13 Thread KangMas Willy
Yes I agree with it. In my case I need to restart the box early in the morning 
daily (I sent around 5 millions MT/day). Need some bug fix on it.



sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/


On Sep 12, 2010, at 4:18 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:

 I've just tried to reproduce the sqlbox issue with the MO's being lost, and 
 couldn't. Tried with up to 100K messages using fakesmsc and all of them were 
 inserted on the DB.
 
 I've tried both with latest sqlbox SVN and also with 0.7.2 and in both cases 
 worked exactly the same. Perhaps something changed on Kannel's side during 
 last year that fixed the issue without us noticing? Anyway, it's definitely 
 gone for good :)
 
 BTW, I've been bitten by the retry bug: the few messages that failed on 
 smsbox (because the web server couldn't cope with them) were queued in 
 _memory_ (they'd be gone if I'd stop smsbox) and retried one by one on 30 
 seconds interval. IMHO_that_ is a serious bug on Kannel that should be taken 
 care of asap.
 
 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1 200 4 
 - Kannel/svn-r4838
 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1 200 4 
 - Kannel/svn-r4838
 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1 200 4 
 - Kannel/svn-r4838
 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1 200 4 
 - Kannel/svn-r4838
 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1 200 4 
 - Kannel/svn-r4838
 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1 200 4 
 - Kannel/svn-r4838
 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1 200 4 
 - Kannel/svn-r4838
 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1 200 4 
 - Kannel/svn-r4838
 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:49 -0300] GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1 200 4 
 - Kannel/svn-r4838
 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:10:19 -0300] GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1 200 4 
 - Kannel/svn-r4838
 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:10:49 -0300] GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1 200 4 
 - Kannel/svn-r4838
 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:11:19 -0300] GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1 200 4 
 - Kannel/svn-r4838
 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:11:49 -0300] GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1 200 4 
 - Kannel/svn-r4838
 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:12:19 -0300] GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1 200 4 
 - Kannel/svn-r4838
 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:12:49 -0300] GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1 200 4 
 - Kannel/svn-r4838
 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:13:19 -0300] GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1 200 4 
 - Kannel/svn-r4838
 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:13:49 -0300] GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1 200 4 
 - Kannel/svn-r4838
 
 Settings were:
 
 http-request-retry  = 10
 http-queue-delay= 30
 
 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org
 
 
 
 On 11/09/2010, at 11:55, Alexander Malysh wrote:
 
 oops, this patch should definitely go in.
 
 
 Am 10.09.2010 um 22:07 schrieb Rene Kluwen:
 
 Not sure if anybody noticed. But not all sms messages were acked properly 
 before, leaving messages in the message store.
 I stuck across this, while implementing sqlbox for a client.
  
 This patch solves the problem. I would like to see it implemented before 
 next devel-release. Votes?
  
 == Rene
  
  
 From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] 
 Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 20:30
 To: Rene Kluwen
 Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel'
 Subject: Re: Release plan
  
 Yes, that was what I was thinking also. I'll try with an older version of 
 Sqlbox and latest SVN to see if there's any differences.
  
 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org
  
  
  
 On 10/09/2010, at 20:12, Rene Kluwen wrote:
 
 
 If it has something to do with acks, then this might be the case.
  
 == Rene
  
 From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com] 
 Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 19:23
 To: Rene Kluwen
 Cc: Alexander Malysh; Victor Luchitz; Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan
  
 Wow, that's odd. Perhaps one of the latest patches solved it?
  
 I'll try to reproduce it this weekend to be sure.
  
 Regards,
  
 Alex
 
 On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote:
 Just sent a million messages via Nikos' stress test.
 And they all arrived, without losing a single message.
 
 == Rene
 
 
  2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org:
  Hi Rene,
 
  we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's
 better to delay let us know.
 
  Thanks,
  Alexander Malysh
 
  Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:
 
  @Alejandro:
  Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section known
 bugs.
 
  @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
  been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.
 
  @ both: I will investigate the MO problem of sqlbox.
 
  == Rene
 
  -Original Message-
  From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
 Behalf

Re: Release plan

2010-09-11 Thread Alexander Malysh
oops, this patch should definitely go in.


Am 10.09.2010 um 22:07 schrieb Rene Kluwen:

 Not sure if anybody noticed. But not all sms messages were acked properly 
 before, leaving messages in the message store.
 I stuck across this, while implementing sqlbox for a client.
  
 This patch solves the problem. I would like to see it implemented before next 
 devel-release. Votes?
  
 == Rene
  
  
 From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] 
 Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 20:30
 To: Rene Kluwen
 Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel'
 Subject: Re: Release plan
  
 Yes, that was what I was thinking also. I'll try with an older version of 
 Sqlbox and latest SVN to see if there's any differences.
  
 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org
  
  
  
 On 10/09/2010, at 20:12, Rene Kluwen wrote:
 
 
 If it has something to do with acks, then this might be the case.
  
 == Rene
  
 From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com] 
 Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 19:23
 To: Rene Kluwen
 Cc: Alexander Malysh; Victor Luchitz; Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan
  
 Wow, that's odd. Perhaps one of the latest patches solved it?
  
 I'll try to reproduce it this weekend to be sure.
  
 Regards,
  
 Alex
 
 On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote:
 Just sent a million messages via Nikos' stress test.
 And they all arrived, without losing a single message.
 
 == Rene
 
 
  2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org:
  Hi Rene,
 
  we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's
 better to delay let us know.
 
  Thanks,
  Alexander Malysh
 
  Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:
 
  @Alejandro:
  Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section known
 bugs.
 
  @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
  been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.
 
  @ both: I will investigate the MO problem of sqlbox.
 
  == Rene
 
  -Original Message-
  From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
 Behalf
  Of Alejandro Guerrieri
  Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
  To: Alexander Malysh
  Cc: Kannel Devel
  Subject: Re: Release plan
 
  On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data
 branch
  was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.
 
  To describe the problem further:
 
  The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's
 only
  observed on MO traffic.
 
  When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
  sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
  logs shows nothing relevant.
 
  The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
  happening.
 
  I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
  side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel
 (pre
  meta-data).
 
  Regards,
  --
  Alejandro Guerrieri
  aguerri...@kannel.org
 
 
 
  On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:
 
  Hi together,
 
  we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
  For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge,
 wtls
  branch.
 
  We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
  could you please
  check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
  with Kannel and whether
  boxes ready for release?
 
  The plan would be:
  1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
  2) next week testing
  3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
  Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
  somebody sees showstopper.
 
  Thanks,
  Alexander Malysh
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --
  Best regards,
   Victor Luchitz
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 sqlbox_acks_3.patch



Re: Release plan

2010-09-11 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
Commited to SVN.

Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
aguerri...@kannel.org



On 11/09/2010, at 11:55, Alexander Malysh wrote:

 oops, this patch should definitely go in.
 
 
 Am 10.09.2010 um 22:07 schrieb Rene Kluwen:
 
 Not sure if anybody noticed. But not all sms messages were acked properly 
 before, leaving messages in the message store.
 I stuck across this, while implementing sqlbox for a client.
  
 This patch solves the problem. I would like to see it implemented before 
 next devel-release. Votes?
  
 == Rene
  
  
 From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] 
 Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 20:30
 To: Rene Kluwen
 Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel'
 Subject: Re: Release plan
  
 Yes, that was what I was thinking also. I'll try with an older version of 
 Sqlbox and latest SVN to see if there's any differences.
  
 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org
  
  
  
 On 10/09/2010, at 20:12, Rene Kluwen wrote:
 
 
 If it has something to do with acks, then this might be the case.
  
 == Rene
  
 From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com] 
 Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 19:23
 To: Rene Kluwen
 Cc: Alexander Malysh; Victor Luchitz; Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan
  
 Wow, that's odd. Perhaps one of the latest patches solved it?
  
 I'll try to reproduce it this weekend to be sure.
  
 Regards,
  
 Alex
 
 On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote:
 Just sent a million messages via Nikos' stress test.
 And they all arrived, without losing a single message.
 
 == Rene
 
 
  2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org:
  Hi Rene,
 
  we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's
 better to delay let us know.
 
  Thanks,
  Alexander Malysh
 
  Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:
 
  @Alejandro:
  Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section known
 bugs.
 
  @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
  been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.
 
  @ both: I will investigate the MO problem of sqlbox.
 
  == Rene
 
  -Original Message-
  From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
 Behalf
  Of Alejandro Guerrieri
  Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
  To: Alexander Malysh
  Cc: Kannel Devel
  Subject: Re: Release plan
 
  On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data
 branch
  was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.
 
  To describe the problem further:
 
  The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's
 only
  observed on MO traffic.
 
  When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
  sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
  logs shows nothing relevant.
 
  The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
  happening.
 
  I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
  side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel
 (pre
  meta-data).
 
  Regards,
  --
  Alejandro Guerrieri
  aguerri...@kannel.org
 
 
 
  On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:
 
  Hi together,
 
  we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
  For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge,
 wtls
  branch.
 
  We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
  could you please
  check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
  with Kannel and whether
  boxes ready for release?
 
  The plan would be:
  1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
  2) next week testing
  3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
  Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
  somebody sees showstopper.
 
  Thanks,
  Alexander Malysh
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --
  Best regards,
   Victor Luchitz
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 sqlbox_acks_3.patch
 



Re: Release plan

2010-09-10 Thread Alexander Malysh
it depends on patch, post it to ML and CC me directly.

Thanks,
Alexander Malysh

Am 09.09.2010 um 23:55 schrieb Victor Luchitz:

 Any chance for a patch that adds another parameter
 bb_smscconn_send_failed to set the meta_data field for DLR to be
 merged in the upcoming days? I'm yet to cook it, but it's pretty
 trivial and should be safe.
 
 2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org:
 Hi Rene,
 
 we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's 
 better to delay let us know.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh
 
 Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:
 
 @Alejandro:
 Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section known bugs.
 
 @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
 been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.
 
 @ both: I will investigate the MO problem of sqlbox.
 
 == Rene
 
 -Original Message-
 From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
 Of Alejandro Guerrieri
 Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
 To: Alexander Malysh
 Cc: Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan
 
 On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data branch
 was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.
 
 To describe the problem further:
 
 The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's only
 observed on MO traffic.
 
 When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
 sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
 logs shows nothing relevant.
 
 The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
 happening.
 
 I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
 side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel (pre
 meta-data).
 
 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org
 
 
 
 On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:
 
 Hi together,
 
 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, wtls
 branch.
 
 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
 could you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
 with Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?
 
 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
 somebody sees showstopper.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Best regards,
  Victor Luchitz
 




RE: Release plan

2010-09-10 Thread Rene Kluwen
Just sent a million messages via Nikos' stress test.
And they all arrived, without losing a single message.

== Rene


 2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org:
 Hi Rene,
 
 we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's
better to delay let us know.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh
 
 Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:
 
 @Alejandro:
 Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section known
bugs.
 
 @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
 been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.
 
 @ both: I will investigate the MO problem of sqlbox.
 
 == Rene
 
 -Original Message-
 From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
Behalf
 Of Alejandro Guerrieri
 Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
 To: Alexander Malysh
 Cc: Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan
 
 On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data
branch
 was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.
 
 To describe the problem further:
 
 The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's
only
 observed on MO traffic.
 
 When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
 sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
 logs shows nothing relevant.
 
 The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
 happening.
 
 I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
 side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel
(pre
 meta-data).
 
 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org
 
 
 
 On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:
 
 Hi together,
 
 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge,
wtls
 branch.
 
 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
 could you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
 with Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?
 
 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
 somebody sees showstopper.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Best regards,
  Victor Luchitz
 







RE: Release plan

2010-09-10 Thread Rene Kluwen
If it has something to do with acks, then this might be the case.

 

== Rene

 

From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 19:23
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: Alexander Malysh; Victor Luchitz; Kannel Devel
Subject: Re: Release plan

 

Wow, that's odd. Perhaps one of the latest patches solved it?

 

I'll try to reproduce it this weekend to be sure.

 

Regards,

 

Alex

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote:

Just sent a million messages via Nikos' stress test.
And they all arrived, without losing a single message.

== Rene


 2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org:
 Hi Rene,

 we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's
better to delay let us know.

 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh

 Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:

 @Alejandro:
 Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section known
bugs.

 @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
 been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.

 @ both: I will investigate the MO problem of sqlbox.

 == Rene

 -Original Message-
 From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
Behalf
 Of Alejandro Guerrieri
 Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
 To: Alexander Malysh
 Cc: Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan

 On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data
branch
 was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.

 To describe the problem further:

 The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's
only
 observed on MO traffic.

 When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
 sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
 logs shows nothing relevant.

 The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
 happening.

 I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
 side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel
(pre
 meta-data).

 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org



 On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:

 Hi together,

 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge,
wtls
 branch.

 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
 could you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
 with Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?

 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe

 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
 somebody sees showstopper.

 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh










 --
 Best regards,
  Victor Luchitz






 



Re: Release plan

2010-09-10 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
Yes, that was what I was thinking also. I'll try with an older version of 
Sqlbox and latest SVN to see if there's any differences.

Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
aguerri...@kannel.org



On 10/09/2010, at 20:12, Rene Kluwen wrote:

 If it has something to do with acks, then this might be the case.
  
 == Rene
  
 From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com] 
 Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 19:23
 To: Rene Kluwen
 Cc: Alexander Malysh; Victor Luchitz; Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan
  
 Wow, that's odd. Perhaps one of the latest patches solved it?
  
 I'll try to reproduce it this weekend to be sure.
  
 Regards,
  
 Alex
 
 On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote:
 Just sent a million messages via Nikos' stress test.
 And they all arrived, without losing a single message.
 
 == Rene
 
 
  2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org:
  Hi Rene,
 
  we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's
 better to delay let us know.
 
  Thanks,
  Alexander Malysh
 
  Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:
 
  @Alejandro:
  Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section known
 bugs.
 
  @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
  been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.
 
  @ both: I will investigate the MO problem of sqlbox.
 
  == Rene
 
  -Original Message-
  From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
 Behalf
  Of Alejandro Guerrieri
  Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
  To: Alexander Malysh
  Cc: Kannel Devel
  Subject: Re: Release plan
 
  On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data
 branch
  was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.
 
  To describe the problem further:
 
  The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's
 only
  observed on MO traffic.
 
  When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
  sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
  logs shows nothing relevant.
 
  The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
  happening.
 
  I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
  side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel
 (pre
  meta-data).
 
  Regards,
  --
  Alejandro Guerrieri
  aguerri...@kannel.org
 
 
 
  On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:
 
  Hi together,
 
  we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
  For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge,
 wtls
  branch.
 
  We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
  could you please
  check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
  with Kannel and whether
  boxes ready for release?
 
  The plan would be:
  1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
  2) next week testing
  3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
  Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
  somebody sees showstopper.
 
  Thanks,
  Alexander Malysh
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --
  Best regards,
   Victor Luchitz
 
 
 
 
 
  



RE: Release plan

2010-09-10 Thread Rene Kluwen
Not sure if anybody noticed. But not all sms messages were acked properly
before, leaving messages in the message store.

I stuck across this, while implementing sqlbox for a client.

 

This patch solves the problem. I would like to see it implemented before
next devel-release. Votes?

 

== Rene

 

 

From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] 
Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 20:30
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel'
Subject: Re: Release plan

 

Yes, that was what I was thinking also. I'll try with an older version of
Sqlbox and latest SVN to see if there's any differences.

 

Regards,

--

Alejandro Guerrieri

aguerri...@kannel.org

 

 

 

On 10/09/2010, at 20:12, Rene Kluwen wrote:





If it has something to do with acks, then this might be the case.

 

== Rene

 

From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 19:23
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: Alexander Malysh; Victor Luchitz; Kannel Devel
Subject: Re: Release plan

 

Wow, that's odd. Perhaps one of the latest patches solved it?

 

I'll try to reproduce it this weekend to be sure.

 

Regards,

 

Alex

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote:

Just sent a million messages via Nikos' stress test.
And they all arrived, without losing a single message.

== Rene


 2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org:
 Hi Rene,

 we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's
better to delay let us know.

 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh

 Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:

 @Alejandro:
 Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section known
bugs.

 @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
 been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.

 @ both: I will investigate the MO problem of sqlbox.

 == Rene

 -Original Message-
 From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
Behalf
 Of Alejandro Guerrieri
 Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
 To: Alexander Malysh
 Cc: Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan

 On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data
branch
 was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.

 To describe the problem further:

 The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's
only
 observed on MO traffic.

 When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
 sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
 logs shows nothing relevant.

 The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
 happening.

 I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
 side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel
(pre
 meta-data).

 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org



 On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:

 Hi together,

 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge,
wtls
 branch.

 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
 could you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
 with Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?

 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe

 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
 somebody sees showstopper.

 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh










 --
 Best regards,
  Victor Luchitz







 

 



sqlbox_acks_3.patch
Description: Binary data


Re: Release plan

2010-09-10 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
I wonder why it was like that on first place...

I'm +1 for it.

Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
aguerri...@kannel.org



On 10/09/2010, at 22:07, Rene Kluwen wrote:

 Not sure if anybody noticed. But not all sms messages were acked properly 
 before, leaving messages in the message store.
 I stuck across this, while implementing sqlbox for a client.
  
 This patch solves the problem. I would like to see it implemented before next 
 devel-release. Votes?
  
 == Rene
  
  
 From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] 
 Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 20:30
 To: Rene Kluwen
 Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel'
 Subject: Re: Release plan
  
 Yes, that was what I was thinking also. I'll try with an older version of 
 Sqlbox and latest SVN to see if there's any differences.
  
 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org
  
  
  
 On 10/09/2010, at 20:12, Rene Kluwen wrote:
 
 
 If it has something to do with acks, then this might be the case.
  
 == Rene
  
 From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com] 
 Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 19:23
 To: Rene Kluwen
 Cc: Alexander Malysh; Victor Luchitz; Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan
  
 Wow, that's odd. Perhaps one of the latest patches solved it?
  
 I'll try to reproduce it this weekend to be sure.
  
 Regards,
  
 Alex
 
 On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote:
 Just sent a million messages via Nikos' stress test.
 And they all arrived, without losing a single message.
 
 == Rene
 
 
  2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org:
  Hi Rene,
 
  we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's
 better to delay let us know.
 
  Thanks,
  Alexander Malysh
 
  Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:
 
  @Alejandro:
  Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section known
 bugs.
 
  @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
  been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.
 
  @ both: I will investigate the MO problem of sqlbox.
 
  == Rene
 
  -Original Message-
  From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
 Behalf
  Of Alejandro Guerrieri
  Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
  To: Alexander Malysh
  Cc: Kannel Devel
  Subject: Re: Release plan
 
  On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data
 branch
  was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.
 
  To describe the problem further:
 
  The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's
 only
  observed on MO traffic.
 
  When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
  sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
  logs shows nothing relevant.
 
  The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
  happening.
 
  I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
  side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel
 (pre
  meta-data).
 
  Regards,
  --
  Alejandro Guerrieri
  aguerri...@kannel.org
 
 
 
  On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:
 
  Hi together,
 
  we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
  For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge,
 wtls
  branch.
 
  We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
  could you please
  check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
  with Kannel and whether
  boxes ready for release?
 
  The plan would be:
  1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
  2) next week testing
  3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
  Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
  somebody sees showstopper.
 
  Thanks,
  Alexander Malysh
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --
  Best regards,
   Victor Luchitz
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 sqlbox_acks_3.patch



RE: Release plan

2010-09-10 Thread Rene Kluwen
It was like that in the first place, because I thought all the ACK/
messages in the log table were only noise and not relevant.

Since no messages were acked at all, it didn't pose a problem. But now the
messages are acked (more) correctly, these messages need to be acked as
well.

 

== Rene

 

 

From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] 
Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 22:16
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel'; 'Alexander Malysh'
Subject: Re: Release plan

 

I wonder why it was like that on first place...

 

I'm +1 for it.

 

Regards,

--

Alejandro Guerrieri

aguerri...@kannel.org

 

 

 

On 10/09/2010, at 22:07, Rene Kluwen wrote:





Not sure if anybody noticed. But not all sms messages were acked properly
before, leaving messages in the message store.

I stuck across this, while implementing sqlbox for a client.

 

This patch solves the problem. I would like to see it implemented before
next devel-release. Votes?

 

== Rene

 

 

From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] 
Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 20:30
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel'
Subject: Re: Release plan

 

Yes, that was what I was thinking also. I'll try with an older version of
Sqlbox and latest SVN to see if there's any differences.

 

Regards,

--

Alejandro Guerrieri

aguerri...@kannel.org

 

 

 

On 10/09/2010, at 20:12, Rene Kluwen wrote:






If it has something to do with acks, then this might be the case.

 

== Rene

 

From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 19:23
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: Alexander Malysh; Victor Luchitz; Kannel Devel
Subject: Re: Release plan

 

Wow, that's odd. Perhaps one of the latest patches solved it?

 

I'll try to reproduce it this weekend to be sure.

 

Regards,

 

Alex

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote:

Just sent a million messages via Nikos' stress test.
And they all arrived, without losing a single message.

== Rene


 2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org:
 Hi Rene,

 we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's
better to delay let us know.

 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh

 Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:

 @Alejandro:
 Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section known
bugs.

 @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
 been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.

 @ both: I will investigate the MO problem of sqlbox.

 == Rene

 -Original Message-
 From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
Behalf
 Of Alejandro Guerrieri
 Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
 To: Alexander Malysh
 Cc: Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan

 On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data
branch
 was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.

 To describe the problem further:

 The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's
only
 observed on MO traffic.

 When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
 sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
 logs shows nothing relevant.

 The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
 happening.

 I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
 side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel
(pre
 meta-data).

 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org



 On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:

 Hi together,

 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge,
wtls
 branch.

 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
 could you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
 with Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?

 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe

 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
 somebody sees showstopper.

 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh










 --
 Best regards,
  Victor Luchitz








 

 

sqlbox_acks_3.patch

 



Re: Release plan

2010-09-10 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
I see. Do you want to commit it yourself? I can do it tomorrow otherwise.

Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
aguerri...@kannel.org



On 10/09/2010, at 22:18, Rene Kluwen wrote:

 It was like that in the first place, because I thought all the “ACK/” 
 messages in the log table were only noise and not relevant.
 Since no messages were acked at all, it didn’t pose a “problem”. But now the 
 messages are acked (more) correctly, these messages need to be acked as well.
  
 == Rene
  
  
 From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] 
 Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 22:16
 To: Rene Kluwen
 Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel'; 'Alexander Malysh'
 Subject: Re: Release plan
  
 I wonder why it was like that on first place...
  
 I'm +1 for it.
  
 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org
  
  
  
 On 10/09/2010, at 22:07, Rene Kluwen wrote:
 
 
 Not sure if anybody noticed. But not all sms messages were acked properly 
 before, leaving messages in the message store.
 I stuck across this, while implementing sqlbox for a client.
  
 This patch solves the problem. I would like to see it implemented before next 
 devel-release. Votes?
  
 == Rene
  
  
 From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] 
 Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 20:30
 To: Rene Kluwen
 Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel'
 Subject: Re: Release plan
  
 Yes, that was what I was thinking also. I'll try with an older version of 
 Sqlbox and latest SVN to see if there's any differences.
  
 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org
  
  
  
 On 10/09/2010, at 20:12, Rene Kluwen wrote:
 
 
 
 If it has something to do with acks, then this might be the case.
  
 == Rene
  
 From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com] 
 Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 19:23
 To: Rene Kluwen
 Cc: Alexander Malysh; Victor Luchitz; Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan
  
 Wow, that's odd. Perhaps one of the latest patches solved it?
  
 I'll try to reproduce it this weekend to be sure.
  
 Regards,
  
 Alex
 
 On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote:
 Just sent a million messages via Nikos' stress test.
 And they all arrived, without losing a single message.
 
 == Rene
 
 
  2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org:
  Hi Rene,
 
  we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's
 better to delay let us know.
 
  Thanks,
  Alexander Malysh
 
  Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:
 
  @Alejandro:
  Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section known
 bugs.
 
  @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
  been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.
 
  @ both: I will investigate the MO problem of sqlbox.
 
  == Rene
 
  -Original Message-
  From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
 Behalf
  Of Alejandro Guerrieri
  Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
  To: Alexander Malysh
  Cc: Kannel Devel
  Subject: Re: Release plan
 
  On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data
 branch
  was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.
 
  To describe the problem further:
 
  The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's
 only
  observed on MO traffic.
 
  When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
  sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
  logs shows nothing relevant.
 
  The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
  happening.
 
  I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
  side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel
 (pre
  meta-data).
 
  Regards,
  --
  Alejandro Guerrieri
  aguerri...@kannel.org
 
 
 
  On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:
 
  Hi together,
 
  we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
  For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge,
 wtls
  branch.
 
  We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
  could you please
  check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
  with Kannel and whether
  boxes ready for release?
 
  The plan would be:
  1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
  2) next week testing
  3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
  Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
  somebody sees showstopper.
 
  Thanks,
  Alexander Malysh
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --
  Best regards,
   Victor Luchitz
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 sqlbox_acks_3.patch
  



RE: Release plan

2010-09-10 Thread Rene Kluwen
Please do it tomorrow for me. So other people have a chance to judge the
patch as well.

 

== Rene

 

From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] 
Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 22:33
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel'; 'Alexander Malysh'
Subject: Re: Release plan

 

I see. Do you want to commit it yourself? I can do it tomorrow otherwise.

 

Regards,

--

Alejandro Guerrieri

aguerri...@kannel.org

 

 

 

On 10/09/2010, at 22:18, Rene Kluwen wrote:





It was like that in the first place, because I thought all the ACK/
messages in the log table were only noise and not relevant.

Since no messages were acked at all, it didn't pose a problem. But now the
messages are acked (more) correctly, these messages need to be acked as
well.

 

== Rene

 

 

From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] 
Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 22:16
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel'; 'Alexander Malysh'
Subject: Re: Release plan

 

I wonder why it was like that on first place...

 

I'm +1 for it.

 

Regards,

--

Alejandro Guerrieri

aguerri...@kannel.org

 

 

 

On 10/09/2010, at 22:07, Rene Kluwen wrote:






Not sure if anybody noticed. But not all sms messages were acked properly
before, leaving messages in the message store.

I stuck across this, while implementing sqlbox for a client.

 

This patch solves the problem. I would like to see it implemented before
next devel-release. Votes?

 

== Rene

 

 

From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] 
Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 20:30
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel'
Subject: Re: Release plan

 

Yes, that was what I was thinking also. I'll try with an older version of
Sqlbox and latest SVN to see if there's any differences.

 

Regards,

--

Alejandro Guerrieri

aguerri...@kannel.org

 

 

 

On 10/09/2010, at 20:12, Rene Kluwen wrote:







If it has something to do with acks, then this might be the case.

 

== Rene

 

From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 19:23
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: Alexander Malysh; Victor Luchitz; Kannel Devel
Subject: Re: Release plan

 

Wow, that's odd. Perhaps one of the latest patches solved it?

 

I'll try to reproduce it this weekend to be sure.

 

Regards,

 

Alex

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote:

Just sent a million messages via Nikos' stress test.
And they all arrived, without losing a single message.

== Rene


 2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org:
 Hi Rene,

 we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's
better to delay let us know.

 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh

 Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:

 @Alejandro:
 Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section known
bugs.

 @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
 been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.

 @ both: I will investigate the MO problem of sqlbox.

 == Rene

 -Original Message-
 From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
Behalf
 Of Alejandro Guerrieri
 Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
 To: Alexander Malysh
 Cc: Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan

 On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data
branch
 was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.

 To describe the problem further:

 The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's
only
 observed on MO traffic.

 When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
 sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
 logs shows nothing relevant.

 The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
 happening.

 I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
 side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel
(pre
 meta-data).

 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org



 On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:

 Hi together,

 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge,
wtls
 branch.

 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
 could you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
 with Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?

 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe

 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
 somebody sees showstopper.

 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh










 --
 Best regards,
  Victor Luchitz









 

 

sqlbox_acks_3.patch

 

 



Re: Release plan

2010-09-10 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Looks good.

+1

Nikos
  - Original Message - 
  From: Rene Kluwen 
  To: 'Alejandro Guerrieri' 
  Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri' ; 'Kannel Devel' 
  Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 11:07 PM
  Subject: RE: Release plan


  Not sure if anybody noticed. But not all sms messages were acked properly 
before, leaving messages in the message store.

  I stuck across this, while implementing sqlbox for a client.

   

  This patch solves the problem. I would like to see it implemented before next 
devel-release. Votes?

   

  == Rene

   

   

  From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] 
  Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 20:30
  To: Rene Kluwen
  Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel'
  Subject: Re: Release plan

   

  Yes, that was what I was thinking also. I'll try with an older version of 
Sqlbox and latest SVN to see if there's any differences.

   

  Regards,

  --

  Alejandro Guerrieri

  aguerri...@kannel.org

   

   

   

  On 10/09/2010, at 20:12, Rene Kluwen wrote:





  If it has something to do with acks, then this might be the case.

   

  == Rene

   

  From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com] 
  Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 19:23
  To: Rene Kluwen
  Cc: Alexander Malysh; Victor Luchitz; Kannel Devel
  Subject: Re: Release plan

   

  Wow, that's odd. Perhaps one of the latest patches solved it?

   

  I'll try to reproduce it this weekend to be sure.

   

  Regards,

   

  Alex

  On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl wrote:

  Just sent a million messages via Nikos' stress test.
  And they all arrived, without losing a single message.

  == Rene


   2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org:
   Hi Rene,
  
   we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's
  better to delay let us know.
  
   Thanks,
   Alexander Malysh
  
   Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:
  
   @Alejandro:
   Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section known
  bugs.
  
   @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
   been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.
  
   @ both: I will investigate the MO problem of sqlbox.
  
   == Rene
  
   -Original Message-
   From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
  Behalf
   Of Alejandro Guerrieri
   Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
   To: Alexander Malysh
   Cc: Kannel Devel
   Subject: Re: Release plan
  
   On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data
  branch
   was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.
  
   To describe the problem further:
  
   The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's
  only
   observed on MO traffic.
  
   When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
   sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
   logs shows nothing relevant.
  
   The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
   happening.
  
   I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
   side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel
  (pre
   meta-data).
  
   Regards,
   --
   Alejandro Guerrieri
   aguerri...@kannel.org
  
  
  
   On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:
  
   Hi together,
  
   we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
   For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge,
  wtls
   branch.
  
   We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
   could you please
   check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
   with Kannel and whether
   boxes ready for release?
  
   The plan would be:
   1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
   2) next week testing
   3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
  
   Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
   somebody sees showstopper.
  
   Thanks,
   Alexander Malysh
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   --
   Best regards,
Victor Luchitz
  






   

   


Re: Release plan

2010-09-09 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data branch was 
applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.

To describe the problem further:

The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's only 
observed on MO traffic.

When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you sustain 
a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The logs shows 
nothing relevant.

The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's 
happening.

I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's side. 
The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel (pre meta-data).

Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
aguerri...@kannel.org



On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:

 Hi together,
 
 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, wtls 
 branch.
 
 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex: could 
 you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release with 
 Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?
 
 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether 
 somebody sees showstopper.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh




Re: Release plan

2010-09-09 Thread Alexander Malysh
hmm, I'm nor really sure how meta-data can affect MO handling...

any chance to fix it this week/weekend? otherwise we have to exclude sqlbox...

Thanks,
Alexander Malysh

Am 09.09.2010 um 15:33 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:

 On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data branch 
 was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.
 
 To describe the problem further:
 
 The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's only 
 observed on MO traffic.
 
 When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you 
 sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The logs 
 shows nothing relevant.
 
 The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's 
 happening.
 
 I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's 
 side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel (pre 
 meta-data).
 
 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org
 
 
 
 On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:
 
 Hi together,
 
 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, wtls 
 branch.
 
 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex: could 
 you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release with 
 Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?
 
 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether 
 somebody sees showstopper.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh
 




RE: Release plan

2010-09-09 Thread Rene Kluwen
@Alejandro:
Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section known bugs.

@Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.

@ both: I will investigate the MO problem of sqlbox.

== Rene

-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of Alejandro Guerrieri
Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
To: Alexander Malysh
Cc: Kannel Devel
Subject: Re: Release plan

On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data branch
was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.

To describe the problem further:

The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's only
observed on MO traffic.

When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
logs shows nothing relevant.

The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
happening.

I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel (pre
meta-data).

Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
aguerri...@kannel.org



On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:

 Hi together,
 
 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, wtls
branch.
 
 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
could you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
with Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?
 
 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
somebody sees showstopper.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh







Re: Release plan

2010-09-09 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
Renee,

Ok, fair enough, but probably all in caps ;)

Regards,

Alex
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
aguerri...@kannel.org



On 09/09/2010, at 17:46, Rene Kluwen wrote:

 @Alejandro:
 Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section known bugs.
 
 @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
 been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.
 
 @ both: I will investigate the MO problem of sqlbox.
 
 == Rene
 
 -Original Message-
 From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
 Of Alejandro Guerrieri
 Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
 To: Alexander Malysh
 Cc: Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan
 
 On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data branch
 was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.
 
 To describe the problem further:
 
 The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's only
 observed on MO traffic.
 
 When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
 sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
 logs shows nothing relevant.
 
 The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
 happening.
 
 I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
 side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel (pre
 meta-data).
 
 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org
 
 
 
 On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:
 
 Hi together,
 
 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, wtls
 branch.
 
 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
 could you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
 with Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?
 
 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
 somebody sees showstopper.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh
 
 
 
 




Re: Release plan

2010-09-09 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
Me neither, but the problem definitely arouse when that branch was merged. 
Using Kannel's code from the day before the merge works fine.

I'm currently buried with work, but I'll try to give it a shot during the 
weekend. If anyone else also wishes to take a chance at it, he/she'll be more 
than welcomed also ;)

Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
aguerri...@kannel.org

On 09/09/2010, at 16:15, Alexander Malysh wrote:

 hmm, I'm nor really sure how meta-data can affect MO handling...
 
 any chance to fix it this week/weekend? otherwise we have to exclude sqlbox...
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh
 
 Am 09.09.2010 um 15:33 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:
 
 On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data branch 
 was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.
 
 To describe the problem further:
 
 The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's only 
 observed on MO traffic.
 
 When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you 
 sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The 
 logs shows nothing relevant.
 
 The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's 
 happening.
 
 I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's 
 side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel (pre 
 meta-data).
 
 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org
 
 
 
 On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:
 
 Hi together,
 
 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, wtls 
 branch.
 
 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex: 
 could you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release 
 with Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?
 
 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether 
 somebody sees showstopper.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh
 
 




RE: Release plan

2010-09-09 Thread Rene Kluwen
Giving a shot at is, as we speak!

== Rene

-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of Alejandro Guerrieri
Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 21:37
To: Alexander Malysh
Cc: Kannel Devel
Subject: Re: Release plan

Me neither, but the problem definitely arouse when that branch was merged.
Using Kannel's code from the day before the merge works fine.

I'm currently buried with work, but I'll try to give it a shot during the
weekend. If anyone else also wishes to take a chance at it, he/she'll be
more than welcomed also ;)

Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
aguerri...@kannel.org

On 09/09/2010, at 16:15, Alexander Malysh wrote:

 hmm, I'm nor really sure how meta-data can affect MO handling...
 
 any chance to fix it this week/weekend? otherwise we have to exclude
sqlbox...
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh
 
 Am 09.09.2010 um 15:33 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:
 
 On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data
branch was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.
 
 To describe the problem further:
 
 The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's
only observed on MO traffic.
 
 When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
logs shows nothing relevant.
 
 The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
happening.
 
 I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel (pre
meta-data).
 
 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org
 
 
 
 On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:
 
 Hi together,
 
 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge,
wtls branch.
 
 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
could you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
with Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?
 
 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
somebody sees showstopper.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh
 
 







Re: Release plan

2010-09-09 Thread Alexander Malysh
Hi Rene,

we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's better 
to delay let us know.

Thanks,
Alexander Malysh

Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:

 @Alejandro:
 Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section known bugs.
 
 @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
 been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.
 
 @ both: I will investigate the MO problem of sqlbox.
 
 == Rene
 
 -Original Message-
 From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
 Of Alejandro Guerrieri
 Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
 To: Alexander Malysh
 Cc: Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan
 
 On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data branch
 was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.
 
 To describe the problem further:
 
 The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's only
 observed on MO traffic.
 
 When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
 sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
 logs shows nothing relevant.
 
 The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
 happening.
 
 I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
 side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel (pre
 meta-data).
 
 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org
 
 
 
 On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:
 
 Hi together,
 
 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, wtls
 branch.
 
 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
 could you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
 with Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?
 
 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
 
 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
 somebody sees showstopper.
 
 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh
 
 
 
 




Re: Release plan

2010-09-09 Thread Victor Luchitz
Any chance for a patch that adds another parameter
bb_smscconn_send_failed to set the meta_data field for DLR to be
merged in the upcoming days? I'm yet to cook it, but it's pretty
trivial and should be safe.

2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org:
 Hi Rene,

 we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's 
 better to delay let us know.

 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh

 Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:

 @Alejandro:
 Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section known bugs.

 @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
 been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.

 @ both: I will investigate the MO problem of sqlbox.

 == Rene

 -Original Message-
 From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
 Of Alejandro Guerrieri
 Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
 To: Alexander Malysh
 Cc: Kannel Devel
 Subject: Re: Release plan

 On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data branch
 was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.

 To describe the problem further:

 The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's only
 observed on MO traffic.

 When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
 sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
 logs shows nothing relevant.

 The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
 happening.

 I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
 side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel (pre
 meta-data).

 Regards,
 --
 Alejandro Guerrieri
 aguerri...@kannel.org



 On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:

 Hi together,

 we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
 For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, wtls
 branch.

 We also plan to release sqlbox  opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene  Alex:
 could you please
 check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
 with Kannel and whether
 boxes ready for release?

 The plan would be:
 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
 2) next week testing
 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe

 Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
 somebody sees showstopper.

 Thanks,
 Alexander Malysh










-- 
Best regards,
 Victor Luchitz