Re: [rawhide] colord pulling in 32bit packages on 64bit installs

2013-01-11 Thread Richard Hughes
On 10 January 2013 23:55, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
 It's 'mash' that decides what gets multilibbed. If I read it right, it
 multilibs packages that install files that match the libdir/*.so.*
 pattern, plus a number of hardcoded special cases. It's a bit like
 magic, we'll see how it turns out in tomorrow's rawhide compose.

Ahh, I see. Less magic, more heuristic :)

 Alright, I've pushed the -libs split to rawhide:
 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/colord.git/commit/?id=30fa2dfe

Great, thanks.

 One thing that's still left to do is to make something require the
 daemon package, so that it gets dragged in for new installs. Can you
 figure out where the dep should go and add it there? (Or possibly leave
 it up to comps to drag it in.)

Well, lots of the desktop requires colord explicitly, so something
should bring it in. Even cups depends on the main package for the
*functionality*, not the library.

 My first reaction was to make colord-libs depend on colord. However,
 since gtk3 (its cups printing backend) is linked against libcolord,
 adding the dep there would make colord daemon and argyllcms a hard dep
 for gtk3; I suppose there might be people with minimal install use cases
 that would prefer a more flexible approach.

I think it's sane to switch the libraries like gtk to dep on
colord-libs, as then just need the library for linking against. It's
perfectly valid to have colord-libs installed and colord (the daemon)
not installed for super-minimal install sets.

Richard
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Richard Hughes
I've tried to build colord for f18 a few times now. It builds locally
fine, but when run on Koji it gets killed: make[3]: ***
[FOGRA28L_webcoated.icc] Killed

It only seems to happen when the print profiles are being created,
which do take some time to complete. It probably takes about 20
minutes to generate all the profiles (and a few GB of RAM), which
doesn't seem too long considering the print profiles will only be
built for F17 and F18. I'm sure OpenOffice and the Linux kernel take
longer and more RAM to compile.

Full log available here:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1787/4851787/build.log

I'm getting really close to just shipping a tarball of the locally
built .icc files, although this doesn't seem right at all. Any help
very welcome, thanks.

Richard.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Dan Horák
Richard Hughes píše v Pá 11. 01. 2013 v 09:01 +: 
 I've tried to build colord for f18 a few times now. It builds locally
 fine, but when run on Koji it gets killed: make[3]: ***
 [FOGRA28L_webcoated.icc] Killed
 
 It only seems to happen when the print profiles are being created,
 which do take some time to complete. It probably takes about 20
 minutes to generate all the profiles (and a few GB of RAM), which
 doesn't seem too long considering the print profiles will only be
 built for F17 and F18. I'm sure OpenOffice and the Linux kernel take
 longer and more RAM to compile.
 
 Full log available here:
 http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1787/4851787/build.log
 
 I'm getting really close to just shipping a tarball of the locally
 built .icc files, although this doesn't seem right at all. Any help
 very welcome, thanks.

I'd say it's the OOM killer in kernel what kills your processes. Do the
generators run in parallel? From my experience on Fedora/s390 with
somewhat limited resources, the top memory consumers are compiling large
and complex C++ files and final linking of libraries/binaries (again
from large C++ code) especially when run with parallel make.


Dan


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Richard Hughes
On 11 January 2013 09:13, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
 I'd say it's the OOM killer in kernel what kills your processes. Do the
 generators run in parallel?

No, serially. I've just submitted a scratch build that uses ulimit
-Sv 50 which will cause the profiles to be built in chunks rather
than in one go. Fingers crossed.

Richard.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Nicolas Mailhot

Le Jeu 10 janvier 2013 23:33, Bill Nottingham a écrit :

 -  packagereqtelnet/packagereq

Nowadays it's commonly used to test if a port is open, not to log in
remotely somewhere. What will replace it in this role?

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Ralf Corsepius

On 01/11/2013 10:01 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:

I've tried to build colord for f18 a few times now. It builds locally
fine, but when run on Koji it gets killed: make[3]: ***
[FOGRA28L_webcoated.icc] Killed

It only seems to happen when the print profiles are being created,
which do take some time to complete. It probably takes about 20
minutes to generate all the profiles (and a few GB of RAM), which
doesn't seem too long considering the print profiles will only be
built for F17 and F18. I'm sure OpenOffice and the Linux kernel take
longer and more RAM to compile.

Full log available here:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1787/4851787/build.log


Please make your builds verbose:

Non-verbose logs like this (excerpt from your build.log above) are 
non-helpful when trouble shooting breakdowns (like this one):



make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/colord-0.1.27/libcolord'
 CC   libcolordprivate_a-cd-color.o
 CC   libcolordprivate_a-cd-enum.o
 CC   libcolordprivate_a-cd-math.o


Ralf

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Richard Hughes
On 11 January 2013 10:21, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
 builds verbose

Good idea. Do I just do this or is there some Fedora macro?

@@ -87,10 +91,10 @@ This may be useful for CMYK soft-proofing or for
extra device support.
 --disable-examples \
 --disable-dependency-tracking

-make %{?_smp_mflags}
+make V=1 %{?_smp_mflags}

 %install
-make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+make V=1 install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT

Richard.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

gsoap updated to version 2.8.12 in rawhide

2013-01-11 Thread Mattias Ellert
Hi!

The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.8.12 in rawhide only.
Dependent packages (gfal, gridsite, lcgdm, lcgdm-dav, srm-ifce, voms)
must rebuild.

Mattias



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Xose Vazquez Perez
On 01/11/2013 12:01 AM, William Brown wrote:

 Nothing I didn't know about it. Will read into it now.
 
 Maybe this shows that a documentation component is needed, to bridge
 the gap to say X tool is replaced by Y
 
 IE netstat - ss

man netstat:

NOTE   
   This  program  is obsolete.  Replacement for netstat is ss.  Replacement 
for netstat -r is ip route.  Replacement for netstat -i
   is ip -s link.  Replacement for netstat -g is ip maddr.


net-tools is obsolete [1] since *fourteen* year ago.
And also some tools from iputils: arping ping ifenslave tftpd traceroute6


[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/03/msg00780.html
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:24:00AM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
 
 Le Jeu 10 janvier 2013 23:33, Bill Nottingham a écrit :
 
  -  packagereqtelnet/packagereq
 
 Nowadays it's commonly used to test if a port is open, not to log in
 remotely somewhere. What will replace it in this role?

 nc (from nmap-ncat).

-- 
Tomasz TorczOnly gods can safely risk perfection,
xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl it's a dangerous thing for a man.  -- Alia

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Xose Vazquez Perez
On 01/11/2013 01:17 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:

 +1, the default info is really a PITA to use, pinfo is much better.

-1, pinfo is dispensable:

$ info ls --subnodes --output - | less
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Ralf Corsepius

On 01/11/2013 11:35 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:

On 01/11/2013 12:01 AM, William Brown wrote:


Nothing I didn't know about it. Will read into it now.

Maybe this shows that a documentation component is needed, to bridge
the gap to say X tool is replaced by Y

IE netstat - ss


man netstat:

NOTE
This  program  is obsolete.  Replacement for netstat is ss.  
Replacement for netstat -r is ip route.  Replacement for netstat -i
is ip -s link.  Replacement for netstat -g is ip maddr.


netstat is still widely used ...

... sounds like the plan to obsolete them has failed.

Ralf

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Ralf Corsepius

On 01/11/2013 11:27 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:

On 11 January 2013 10:21, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:

builds verbose


Good idea. Do I just do this

Is the package autotools-based using a recent version of the autotools?

Then its configure script likely honors --disable-silent-rules
(c.f. ./configure --help), which would switch of the silent make rules 
at configure-time.


If the configure script doesn't honor --disable-silent-rules, make V=1 
is worth a try.


In both cases, it's worth contacting upstream to tell them about the 
harmfulness of silent make rules


Ralf



--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Richard Hughes
On 11 January 2013 11:32, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
 Then its configure script likely honors --disable-silent-rules

That works a treat, thanks.

 In both cases, it's worth contacting upstream to tell them about the
 harmfulness of silent make rules

Well, I am upstream :) When I'm developing software it's a lot easier
to spot warnings when they're not buried in pages and pages of debug
output. That said, I agree we need the full logs when building
packages. I'll fix up all my packages to do --disable-silent-rules
when I next bump their versions.

Richard.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:12:46PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
 On 11 January 2013 11:32, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
  Then its configure script likely honors --disable-silent-rules
 
 That works a treat, thanks.
 
  In both cases, it's worth contacting upstream to tell them about the
  harmfulness of silent make rules
 
 Well, I am upstream :) When I'm developing software it's a lot easier
 to spot warnings when they're not buried in pages and pages of debug
 output. That said, I agree we need the full logs when building
 packages. I'll fix up all my packages to do --disable-silent-rules
 when I next bump their versions.

On this theme, one other very useful thing we could improve in Koji
for developer debug of failed builds, would be to capture the 'config.log'
file from any autoconf based builds.

Currently when I get stuck with configure problems I have to hack the
spec file todo  %configure || cat config.log. It'd be nicer to have
config.log as a standalone published file though, because sometimes
you have a successful build but later want to go back and see why
configure chose a particular thing and you're lacking config.log at
that point.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com  -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org   -o-   http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Michael Scherer
Le vendredi 11 janvier 2013 à 11:24 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
 Le Jeu 10 janvier 2013 23:33, Bill Nottingham a écrit :
 
  -  packagereqtelnet/packagereq
 
 Nowadays it's commonly used to test if a port is open, not to log in
 remotely somewhere. What will replace it in this role?

why not bash :) 

$ cat  /dev/tcp/localhost/22
SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.1

-- 
Michael Scherer

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: libcdio 0.90 update in rawhide

2013-01-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 11:44:29 +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:

 On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:22:18PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
  Some weeks ago libcdio 0.90 has been released. In addition to the
  libcdio-0.90 release there have been parts split off into a separate
  package called libcdio-paranoia. libcdio-paranoia has been imported and
  I will now also update libcdio to 0.90 in rawhide. I will rebuild all
  dependencies over the next few days and adjust the depending packages to
  require both libraries where necessary.
 
 I have updated libcdio in rawhide to 0.90 and rebuilt all dependencies.
 There were two failures due to API changes:
 
 audacious-plugins - 
 http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7809/4847809/build.log
 kover - same problem (cdtext related)
 
 and one libcdio unrelated failure:
 
 clementine -  'void g_type_init()' is deprecated
   
 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=4846211name=build.log
 
 
   Adrian
 

For Audacious, there seems to be a change in upstream git already. I've
only seen the diff coming in by mail, cannot tell anything beyond that
and won't be able to commit it before Mon/Tue.

-- 
M
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Feedback wanted: Fedora Formulas

2013-01-11 Thread Ian Malone
On 10 January 2013 23:51, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
 Brendan Jones wrote:
 The main problem we have with kickstarts at the moment is that there is
 no way (according to current packaging guidelines) to alter files owned
 by other packages.

 This is just plain impossible anyway (except for config files in /etc), no
 matter what you do (i.e. not just with kickstarts). The next update of the
 package legitimately owning the file will destroy any changes made to the
 file (except if it was marked %config(noreplace), but files outside of /etc
 must not be marked %config nor %config(noreplace) according to our packaging
 guidelines).


Of course in trying to do that what we were really trying to do was
amend the defaults users would get on the installed system. Some of
this we were able to achieve through /etc/skel files, but that's a
non-scaling and fragile solution as already mentioned. Some was
originally attempted by modifying firstboot modules (a no-no that is
not in the approved spin).

Since we had planned to try and find better solutions with the spins
and engineering teams once the release was out and since ansible
sounds like it can provide some of them (and since the F18 release is
now final - congratulations to everyone who worked hard through
/that/), here are the Music-creation/Jam spin quirks for a case study:

KDE favourites:
For a spin (or formula) it makes sense that the favourites should
reflect the spin (or formula) focus. The kickstart updates this
through /etc/skel/.kde/share/config/kickoffrc and
/etc/rc.d/init.d/livesys (on the live sytem the installer is a
favourite, so these two are slightly different).

Audio group permissions:
Needed for Jack real-time, usermod commands are added to
/etc/rc.d/init.d/livesys so in the live system the liveuser is in
'jackuser' and 'audio'. We can't push this in the installed system at
the moment. (This is one of the parts that had been done with the
firstboot modules, piggybacking on the add-to-administrator group
function. Additionally to modifying files it shouldn't, that simple
approach is also not very compatible with translations.)

Desktop themeing:
Related to KDE favourites above, though of less functional importance.
Again this is currently handled by having a package for the spin
themes which owns an /etc/skel file that allows us to set the default
themes (KDE desktop theme and splash). This is not really a problem
that desktop spins have (since by definition they have their own
independent themes), but for other spins or formulae being able to
tweak the default look slightly gives some sense of individual
identity for the spin itself and also a degree of user-hinting about
the environment they're using.

From my brief skim of the Formula proposal it looks like it can do all
of these. If you can also do a headless/non-interactive setup
targetted at liveuser then presumably it could just be run by the
kickstart during creation of a livecd/dvd (i.e. so things are already
set up in the disk image, you'd then have to run it again during the
actual install, but I think it would be an advantage to not have to do
this every time you start a live image without persistent storage).

-- 
imalone
http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:35:46PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
 Le vendredi 11 janvier 2013 à 11:24 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
  Le Jeu 10 janvier 2013 23:33, Bill Nottingham a écrit :
  
   -  packagereqtelnet/packagereq
  
  Nowadays it's commonly used to test if a port is open, not to log in
  remotely somewhere. What will replace it in this role?
 
 why not bash :) 
 
 $ cat  /dev/tcp/localhost/22
 SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.1

  But for remote

$ telnet damn-web_server 80
GET / HTTP/1.0


 in any case, we can keep it, but moving it out of the standard
group definitely makes sense !

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard  | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat
veill...@redhat.com  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

rawhide report: 20130111 changes

2013-01-11 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Jan 11 08:15:05 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64
--
[audacious-plugins]
audacious-plugins-3.3.3-2.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libcdio.so.13(CDIO_13)(64bit)
audacious-plugins-3.3.3-2.fc19.x86_64 requires libcdio.so.13()(64bit)
[bootconf]
bootconf-1.4-6.fc18.noarch requires grub
[clementine]
clementine-1.0.1-12.fc18.x86_64 requires libcdio.so.13(CDIO_13)(64bit)
clementine-1.0.1-12.fc18.x86_64 requires libcdio.so.13()(64bit)
[ember]
ember-0.6.3-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libOgreMain.so.1.7.4()(64bit)
[epiphany-extensions]
epiphany-extensions-3.6.0-1.fc19.x86_64 requires epiphany(abi) = 0:3.6
[evolution-rss]
1:evolution-rss-0.3.92-3.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libevolution-utils.so()(64bit)
1:evolution-rss-0.3.92-3.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libemiscwidgets.so()(64bit)
1:evolution-rss-0.3.92-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libemail-utils.so()(64bit)
1:evolution-rss-0.3.92-3.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libedataserverui-3.0.so.5()(64bit)
1:evolution-rss-0.3.92-3.fc19.x86_64 requires 
libcamel-1.2.so.42()(64bit)
[freeipa]
freeipa-server-strict-3.1.0-1.fc19.x86_64 requires 389-ds-base = 0:1.3.0
[freewrl]
freewrl-1.22.13.1-3.fc18.i686 requires libGLEW.so.1.7
freewrl-1.22.13.1-3.fc18.x86_64 requires libGLEW.so.1.7()(64bit)
libEAI-1.22.13.1-3.fc18.i686 requires libGLEW.so.1.7
libEAI-1.22.13.1-3.fc18.x86_64 requires libGLEW.so.1.7()(64bit)
[gcc-python-plugin]
gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.11-1.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 
0:4.7.2-8.fc19
gcc-python2-plugin-0.11-1.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-8.fc19
gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.11-1.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 
0:4.7.2-8.fc19
gcc-python3-plugin-0.11-1.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-8.fc19
[gdb-heap]
gdb-heap-0.5-11.fc19.x86_64 requires glibc(x86-64) = 0:2.16.90
[gfal]
gfal-1.13.0-0.fc18.i686 requires libgsoap.so.2
gfal-1.13.0-0.fc18.x86_64 requires libgsoap.so.2()(64bit)
gfal-doc-1.13.0-0.fc18.x86_64 requires libgsoap.so.2()(64bit)
gfal-python-1.13.0-0.fc18.x86_64 requires libgsoap.so.2()(64bit)
[ghc-wai-extra]
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSzlib-conduit-0.4.0.2-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSzlib-bindings-0.1.0.1-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSzlib-0.5.3.3-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSwai-1.2.0.3-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSvoid-0.5.6-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSvault-0.2.0.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSunordered-containers-0.2.1.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSunix-2.5.1.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHStransformers-base-0.4.1-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHStransformers-0.3.0.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHStime-1.4-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHStext-0.11.2.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSsemigroups-0.8.3.2-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSresourcet-0.3.2.2-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSparsec-3.1.2-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSold-time-1.1.0.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSold-locale-1.0.0.4-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSnetwork-2.3.0.13-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSmtl-2.1.1-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSmonad-control-0.3.1.3-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSlifted-base-0.1.1-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSinteger-gmp-0.4.0.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHShttp-types-0.6.11-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHShashable-1.1.2.3-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSghc-prim-0.2.0.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSfilepath-1.3.0.0-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSfast-logger-0.0.2-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 requires 
libHSdlist-0.5-ghc7.4.1.so()(64bit)
ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.4-4.fc18.x86_64 

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Xose Vazquez Perez xose.vazq...@gmail.com said:
 On 01/11/2013 01:17 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
 
  +1, the default info is really a PITA to use, pinfo is much better.
 
 -1, pinfo is dispensable:
 
 $ info ls --subnodes --output - | less

Ah yes, because _that's_ intuitive (especially when you are trying to
find information to fix an immediate problem).

Why not eliminate less and more then?  You can always replace them
with a shell loop.
-- 
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com said:
 Sure, going through the diff:
 
 -  packagereqbc/packagereq

bc and dc are sometimes used for math in shell scripts (and bc is part
of POSIX/SUS).

 -  packagereqed/packagereq

I don't know how widely it is used, but ed is also part of POSIX/SUS.

 -  packagereqftp/packagereq

Either ftp or lftp should still be in the standard install (command line
FTP is sometimes essential, especially when trying to add to a minimal
install).  lftp is bigger than ftp (because lftp does more, such as sftp
and http).

 -  packagereqtalk/packagereq

Another thing not widely used but part of POSIX/SUS.

 -  packagereqtelnet/packagereq

Commonly used for debugging a wide variety of issues.

 -  packagereqbtrfs-progs/packagereq
 
 Will be installed by anaconda if you install on btrfs; can move
 to @core if it becomes the default FS.

There are several common things that you list as installed by anaconda
if needed; that can give you problems if you install in one system or
setup and then move the drive, add other drives, etc.

 -  packagereqdmraid/packagereq
 
 Will be installed by anaconda if you need it.

See above - may be required if you (for example) disconnect all but the
OS drive during install and then put the others back.

 -  packagereqlftp/packagereq
 
 Removed; ftp is in legacy-unix.

If legacy-unix is not part of standard install, that is a poor
justification (we removed one FTP client, so better remove the other as
well).

 -  packagereqmdadm/packagereq
 
 Will be installed by anaconda if you need it (and pulled in by
 udisks2 if you install that.)

See above - may be required if you (for example) disconnect all but the
OS drive during install and then put the others back.

 -  packagereqwireless-tools/packagereq
 
 Functionality subsumed by iw. Although this is perhaps premature until
 initscripts gets ported to it.

I would think so.  You could remove wireless-tools from comps and add it
as a Requires to initscripts, but then somebody not using wireless
couldn't remove it.

I guess my comments get back to: is there a defined goal, other than
remove things Bill doesn't use (not trying to pick on you Bill, but
you did make this list)?  Are we trying to shrink the installed disk
footprint (none of the these are very big)?  Does removing these reduce
install time significantly?

I understand removing support for hardware items that very few have any
more (that's what started this discussion).  I'm just not sure about a
wholesale removal of a bunch of still-useful stuff.
-- 
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Michael Scherer
Le vendredi 11 janvier 2013 à 21:14 +0800, Daniel Veillard a écrit :
 On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:35:46PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
  Le vendredi 11 janvier 2013 à 11:24 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
   Le Jeu 10 janvier 2013 23:33, Bill Nottingham a écrit :
   
-  packagereqtelnet/packagereq
   
   Nowadays it's commonly used to test if a port is open, not to log in
   remotely somewhere. What will replace it in this role?
  
  why not bash :) 
  
  $ cat  /dev/tcp/localhost/22
  SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.1
 
   But for remote
 
 $ telnet damn-web_server 80
 GET / HTTP/1.0
 

http://thesmithfam.org/blog/2006/05/23/bash-socket-programming-with-devtcp-2/

  in any case, we can keep it, but moving it out of the standard
 group definitely makes sense !

+1

telnet is easier, but that's a task that do not happen so often, and
people who are able to perform it are also fully able to find the tool
for that ( and nc is better than telnet on this point, as this permit
more )
-- 
Michael Scherer

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 03:08:21PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
 +idlegacy-unix/id
 +_nameLegacy Unix Support/_name
 +_descriptionThese packages include clients and commands for legacy 
 unix environments./_description
 +defaultfalse/default

I'm not a big fan of this. It mashes a lot of disparate cases together.


 +uservisiblefalse/uservisible
 +packagelist
 +  packagereqbc/packagereq

Very likely to be used in scripts. There's a reasonable expectation for this
to be there. I think it should stay in @standard.

 +  packagereqed/packagereq

Much less likely these days. But whatever.

 +  packagereqfinger/packagereq

The network protocol is obsolete, but as evidenced by the discussion people
still do use it.

 +  packagereqftp/packagereq

This is one of those things where if I'm going to install something _on
purpose_, I'd just use lftp, but which, were I providing an environment for
other people, I'd put there as a courtesy. Maybe that's what Legacy Unix
Support means.

 +  packagereqrsh/packagereq

On the other hand, this one I wouldn't include, because it's an easy upsell
to ssh.

 +  packagereqtalk/packagereq

This is a historical curiosity and unlikely to be useful to people who want
the other things.

 +  packagereqtelnet/packagereq

Incredibly common for testing network connectivity. I think this should stay
in standard.

 +  packagereqypbind/packagereq

But *this* is environment-specific, and these days most people won't need it
at all. I don't think it belongs in any group.


-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  mat...@fedoraproject.org
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:28:23PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
  prelink. Ugh.
 ok, I guess I could try again. Can we remove prelink? 
 What does it get us these days? 

I'm happy to back a feature to drop it.


-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  mat...@fedoraproject.org
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 03:21:18PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
 Remember this is removal from core NOT from the distribution..

Actually, it's about @standard, not @core. Keeping the core minimal makes
sense but I think @standard should provide a comfortable working
environment. People may disagree about what's in here, but the threshold
should be much easier. 

-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  mat...@fedoraproject.org
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 05:33:28PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
 -  packagereqtime/packagereq
 bash has this builtin; don't think the additional features warrant
 this on every non-minimal install.

However, it has different semantics from the bash builtin, and it's likely
that people have scripts which use it.


-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  mat...@fedoraproject.org
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:09:28PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
 telnet is easier, but that's a task that do not happen so often, and
 people who are able to perform it are also fully able to find the tool


I think both the but and the and are not necessarily true.


-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  mat...@fedoraproject.org
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Florian Weimer

On 01/11/2013 02:14 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:35:46PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:

Le vendredi 11 janvier 2013 à 11:24 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :

Le Jeu 10 janvier 2013 23:33, Bill Nottingham a écrit :


-  packagereqtelnet/packagereq


Nowadays it's commonly used to test if a port is open, not to log in
remotely somewhere. What will replace it in this role?


why not bash :)

$ cat  /dev/tcp/localhost/22
SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.1


   But for remote

$ telnet damn-web_server 80
GET / HTTP/1.0



Furthermore, telnet performs LF - CRLF translation, and some 
alternatives don't, at least by default.  This conversion is required 
for protocol-compliant HTTP, and some web servers insist on CRLF line 
endings.


--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Michael Scherer
Le vendredi 11 janvier 2013 à 08:05 -0600, Chris Adams a écrit :
 Once upon a time, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com said:
 
  -  packagereqed/packagereq
 
 I don't know how widely it is used, but ed is also part of POSIX/SUS.

based on my understanding, POSIX do not mandate them to be there by
default, just to support them :
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap02.html

so not installing them by default will not change much, given that we
already do not support several command :
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/toc.html

I see asa, cflow, cxref, delta, fort77, yacc who would make use fail at
POSIX conformance, since none of them are installed by default ( and I
just quickly looked at the list ).

And while I agree the goal to be POSIX compliant is nice, as far as i
know, we are not, so we do not claim to be. ( ie, people cannot and
should not expect the system to have theses utilities by default ).

So maybe a separate group ( and feature, since that's a rather lengthy
task ) for them would be a start, and then packaging and adding the
missing utilities would be the next step before claiming we are
compliant. 

A separate group would be better because :
- this is easier to audit ( especially if the norm is updated )
- this doesn't force to install a compiler by default ( fort77 )

-- 
Michael Scherer

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:47:40PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
 And while I agree the goal to be POSIX compliant is nice, as far as i
 know, we are not, so we do not claim to be. ( ie, people cannot and
 should not expect the system to have theses utilities by default ).

Yeah, but it's reasonable for people to expect that scripts using standard
commands which have always worked on Fedora to continue to work on Fedora
unless there's a good reason for them to not. That doesn't mean we need to
carry cruft for ever, but we should error on the side of compatibly in the
absence of a reason. (And I think saving 120k in non-minimal installs
doesn't count.)


-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  mat...@fedoraproject.org
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Michal Schmidt

Dne 10.1.2013 21:28, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):

ok, I guess I could try again. Can we remove prelink?
What does it get us these days?


Has anything changed about prelink since the last time it was discussed 
here?

prelink should not mess with running executables:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-July/169819.html ?
Or even since prelink: is it worth it?:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-July/034529.html

Michal

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
 ok, I guess I could try again. Can we remove prelink?
 What does it get us these days?
 Has anything changed about prelink since the last time it was
 discussed here?
 prelink should not mess with running executables:
 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-July/169819.html ?
 Or even since prelink: is it worth it?:
 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-July/034529.html

Hardware is faster and any benefit less necessary, making it even less worth
the tradeoffs? I'd like to see some numbers.


-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  mat...@fedoraproject.org
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org said:
 On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
  ok, I guess I could try again. Can we remove prelink?
  What does it get us these days?
  Has anything changed about prelink since the last time it was
  discussed here?
  prelink should not mess with running executables:
  http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-July/169819.html ?
  Or even since prelink: is it worth it?:
  http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-July/034529.html
 
 Hardware is faster and any benefit less necessary, making it even less worth
 the tradeoffs? I'd like to see some numbers.

Before you go too far with this, can prelink be discussed in its own
thread?  I forsee that swamping the rest of this discussion.
-- 
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:55:21 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:

 On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
  ok, I guess I could try again. Can we remove prelink?
  What does it get us these days?
  Has anything changed about prelink since the last time it was
  discussed here?
  prelink should not mess with running executables:
  http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-July/169819.html ?
  Or even since prelink: is it worth it?:
  http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-July/034529.html
 
 Hardware is faster and any benefit less necessary, making it even
 less worth the tradeoffs? I'd like to see some numbers.

Additionally, a number of things in fedora are now being built with PIE
and thus cannot be prelinked. 

(ok, a number is probibly an exaggeration, but it's a few at least). 

kevin



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Ralf Corsepius

On 01/11/2013 01:12 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:

On 11 January 2013 11:32, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:

Then its configure script likely honors --disable-silent-rules


That works a treat, thanks.


In both cases, it's worth contacting upstream to tell them about the
harmfulness of silent make rules


Well, I am upstream :)

Your decision, your poison - Feel encouraged to change your decision :)


When I'm developing software it's a lot easier
to spot warnings when they're not buried in pages and pages of debug
output. That said, I agree we need the full logs when building
packages. I'll fix up all my packages to do --disable-silent-rules
when I next bump their versions.

Well, I am very opposed to silent makerules.

All silent-makerules are doing is to span a hidden mine-field of bugs to 
trap users into.


E.g. are you sure your include paths and the defines your packages are 
using are correct? With silent makerules, you and your users won't 
notice them being wrong - building only appears to be working, while you 
package actually is totally misconfigured.


It's guaranteed such situation will happen, it only a matter of time.

Ralf


--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Reindl Harald


Am 11.01.2013 11:35, schrieb Xose Vazquez Perez:
 On 01/11/2013 12:01 AM, William Brown wrote:
 
 Nothing I didn't know about it. Will read into it now.

 Maybe this shows that a documentation component is needed, to bridge
 the gap to say X tool is replaced by Y

 IE netstat - ss
 
 man netstat:
 
 NOTE   
This  program  is obsolete.  Replacement for netstat is ss.  
 Replacement for netstat -r is ip route.  Replacement for netstat -i
is ip -s link.  Replacement for netstat -g is ip maddr.
 
 
 net-tools is obsolete [1] since *fourteen* year ago.
 And also some tools from iputils: arping ping ifenslave tftpd traceroute6

sarcasmoh yeah ss is a pretty clear and self explaining command/sarcasm

if people would develop SMART repalcements they would call the
binaries identical with compatible command line switches so a
Obsoletes: whatever would not change the USER INTERFACES

fine, you can add addtionoal command line options, you can even
add new specialized binaries in the same package but say
command A with other options replaces well known B is
pretty dumb at all



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:40:40 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:

 sarcasmoh yeah ss is a pretty clear and self explaining
 command/sarcasm
 
 if people would develop SMART repalcements they would call the
 binaries identical with compatible command line switches so a
 Obsoletes: whatever would not change the USER INTERFACES

ss is not command line compatible with netstart AFAIK. 
It provides similar information... 

 fine, you can add addtionoal command line options, you can even
 add new specialized binaries in the same package but say
 command A with other options replaces well known B is
 pretty dumb at all

It takes a long time as we see for new replacements to gain traction,
but things change. :) 

kevin



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: gsoap updated to version 2.8.12 in rawhide

2013-01-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:32:12 +0100
Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se wrote:

 Hi!
 
 The gsoap package has been updated to version 2.8.12 in rawhide only.
 Dependent packages (gfal, gridsite, lcgdm, lcgdm-dav, srm-ifce, voms)
 must rebuild.

Thanks for the heads up. 

Next time can you sent to 'devel-announce' and try and give a week's
notice? (or less if maintainers are all ready or willing to give you
acls to just rebuild things). 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Rawhide_.2F_devel_.2F_master

Thanks, 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:16:50 +
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:

 On this theme, one other very useful thing we could improve in Koji
 for developer debug of failed builds, would be to capture the
 'config.log' file from any autoconf based builds.
 
 Currently when I get stuck with configure problems I have to hack the
 spec file todo  %configure || cat config.log. It'd be nicer to have
 config.log as a standalone published file though, because sometimes
 you have a successful build but later want to go back and see why
 configure chose a particular thing and you're lacking config.log at
 that point.

Perhaps this is something mock could be enhanced to do?

Then koji would (mostly) get it by default from mock...

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Richard Vickery
Lennart,

Just my  $0.02 on halting the inclusion of these:  we might want to make
these available in case there is a user out there who can only afford the
older hardware.
On Jan 10, 2013 7:00 AM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:

 Heya,

 I noticed that comps' standard group includes a lot of packages that
 were all the hotness in 1990s but aren't really that much anymore. For
 example, irda-tools, pcmciautils, finger, rsh, rdist, pinfo have
 probably had their best times behind them, and probably shouldn't be
 installed by default anymore.

 I'd like to propose that maybe it is time to remove these from
 standard for F19. Note sure how to proceed on that. Propose a feature?
 File a bug? Is there even a comps maintainer?

 (Oh, and to clarify this: it's just about what to install by default,
 not about what to ship. It's just that I have a hard time remembering
 when i saw the last laptop with irda or pcmcia ports, and maybe we
 should not install that anymore by default...)

 Lennart

 --
 Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Something is killing my Koji build

2013-01-11 Thread Seth Vidal




On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Kevin Fenzi wrote:


On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:16:50 +
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:


On this theme, one other very useful thing we could improve in Koji
for developer debug of failed builds, would be to capture the
'config.log' file from any autoconf based builds.

Currently when I get stuck with configure problems I have to hack the
spec file todo  %configure || cat config.log. It'd be nicer to have
config.log as a standalone published file though, because sometimes
you have a successful build but later want to go back and see why
configure chose a particular thing and you're lacking config.log at
that point.


Perhaps this is something mock could be enhanced to do?

Then koji would (mostly) get it by default from mock...




Could probably be easiest done as a mock plugin. Have it look for a 
config.log in the build dir and have it pull it out to the results dir. 
Not sure what it would do in the even it found more than one, though.


-sv

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com said:
 ss is not command line compatible with netstart AFAIK. 
 It provides similar information... 

And IMHO that is the problem.  Why did someone see it as a good idea to
develop a replacement for well-known commands (that have existed in
various forms on a lot of other OSes) and not make them at least
somewhat compatible with what they were replacing?

If you want to replace netstat and ifconfig, that's fine, but make a new
netstat and ifconfig (or at least wrappers that handle the common
options and give similar output).  Why do people want to reinvent the
wheel (and ignore all previous wheels)?

-- 
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Michael Scherer
Le vendredi 11 janvier 2013 à 08:39 -0800, Richard Vickery a écrit :
 Lennart,
 
 Just my  $0.02 on halting the inclusion of these:  we might want to
 make these available in case there is a user out there who can only
 afford the older hardware.

They are available, the point is to not install them by default, not to
remove them totally.

IE, if someone has the old hardware, he can still install them.

-- 
Michael Scherer

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Chris Adams wrote:
 Why do people want to reinvent the
 wheel (and ignore all previous wheels)?

Because choice.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Package Signature Checking During Installation

2013-01-11 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 21:49 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: 
 Le Jeu 10 janvier 2013 20:41, Adam Jackson a écrit :
 
  For the same reason Firefox doesn't automatically accept self-signed SSL
  certs, and the same reason that ssh doesn't automatically accept new
  host keys: it'd be creating trust from thin air.
 
 Checking packages are signed by the same key as the installer when yum
 happily trawls half the internet to find mirrors managed by god knows who
 is not thin air security. Right now the only thing that could make our
 installation process more laughably insecure is lapping an 'own me' label
 on one of anaconda's install screens.
 
 Sure checking signature would not be perfect security, but your argument
 is akin to removing airbags from cars that do not have an abs to 'avoid
 creating a false sense of security'

+1, definitely

-- 
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
  Turkish proverb

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Package Signature Checking During Installation

2013-01-11 Thread Miloslav Trmač
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
 For the same reason Firefox doesn't automatically accept self-signed SSL
 certs, and the same reason that ssh doesn't automatically accept new
 host keys: it'd be creating trust from thin air.  With secure boot
 disabled there's no root of trust for verification.  You could verify
 that the signatures were _valid_, but you'd have no grounds to conclude
 from their validity that the signatures were the ones put there by The
 Fedora Project, and therefore that the package contains the data that
 The Fedora Project intended it to contain.  You'd only know that the key
 the repo says signed the packages did in fact sign the packages.

 That's not security.  That's theatre.

Let's be a little more precise.

- For _Fedora_ repositories (the release repository and the updates
repository), we *can* ship the public key inside the installer iso
image.  As has been established in this thread, authenticating the ISO
is necessary in any case; that would also provide a full trust path
to the Fedora repository and packages contained within.  No Secure
Boot required.

  Having this sounds like a nice security improvement that would IMHO
be worth doing.  I'd expect it to be a little difficult to make a good
UI for this: Wwe can enable GPG checking by default for the repository
configuration shipped on the ISO;  but if the user adds a repo
manually we would/would not want to enable GPG checking depending on
whether the repository is/isn't a Fedora one.  Also the UI of
explaining to the user that signatures are not verified if a
third-party repo is added would probably be tricky.


- For _third-party_ repositories, the root of trust can't come from
the installer iso image.  AFAICS _this_ is the primary benefit of the
Secure Boot support - it allows third parties to authenticate their
repositories.

  A caveat here is that it allows _any_ such third parties to
authenticate repositories.  Microsoft?  Accepted.  Oracle Solaris OS
group?  Accepted.  In particular - this is not clear from the feature
page - if any vendor that is able to sign MS drivers is included,
that's _quite a few_ third parties.  Realtek, who has had a signature
stolen by Stuxnet authors?  Accepted.

  So the Secure Boot chain of trust doesn't really allow you to
blindly install software no more than MS Authenticode allows you to
blindly run ActiveX plugins.  Still, it's definitely better than what
we have now.
   Mirek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Jonathan Masters
Hi Lennart,

I would like to remove finger from the list. It is still very much in use. I 
use it many times daily. I realize my use case is multiuser and server systems 
- not of interest to Fedora - but the overhead is little, so I would be 
grateful if it remained.

Jon.

-- 
Sent from my iPad

On Jan 10, 2013, at 10:07, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:

 Heya,
 
 I noticed that comps' standard group includes a lot of packages that
 were all the hotness in 1990s but aren't really that much anymore. For
 example, irda-tools, pcmciautils, finger, rsh, rdist, pinfo have
 probably had their best times behind them, and probably shouldn't be
 installed by default anymore.
 
 I'd like to propose that maybe it is time to remove these from
 standard for F19. Note sure how to proceed on that. Propose a feature?
 File a bug? Is there even a comps maintainer?
 
 (Oh, and to clarify this: it's just about what to install by default,
 not about what to ship. It's just that I have a hard time remembering
 when i saw the last laptop with irda or pcmcia ports, and maybe we
 should not install that anymore by default...)
 
 Lennart
 
 -- 
 Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
 -- 
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora ARM F18 Beta VFAD - Test Images posted

2013-01-11 Thread Jonathan Masters
Hey Lukas,

I think the other (well meaning) responses haven't yet addressed your original 
question. For the record, for ARM development boards, we (Fedora ARM) ship 
prebuilt disk images suitable and intended for dd'ing onto a storage card for 
convenient installation. Other targets support conventional installation[0], 
such as on Calxeda HighBank (known as EnergyCore), and the emulation target 
comes as a rootfs and kernel. If you need a specific kernel binary for one of 
these images, you can extract it as Brendan mentioned, or you can use 
arm.koji.fedoraproject.org to download any package, or the the regular mirrors. 
If you have questions, please join a...@list.fedoraproject.org or #fedora-arm 
on Freenode IRC.

Regards,

Jon.

[0] Someone will feel the need to point out that you could run Anaconda on a 
Trimslice, or on a PandaBoard unless I add this footnote to say I am 
deliberately ignoring that uncommon use case in the general Fedora user base of 
ARM today.

-- 
Sent from my iPad

On Jan 4, 2013, at 10:01, Lukas Zapletal lzap+...@redhat.com wrote:

 Pardon my ignorance, but where can I find the kernel images? These are
 just root systems, right? I'd love to try Kirkwood on NSA-310.
 
 Thanks!
 
 LZ
 
 On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 12:57:19PM -0500, Paul Whalen wrote:
 Please join us today (December 3rd, 2012) in #fedora-arm on Freenode for 
 another Fedora ARM VFAD.
 
 There are a number of pre-created F18 ARM Beta TC1 images available for 
 testing, including: Pandaboard,
 Trimslice, vexpress (QEMU) and Kirkwood. 
 
 Images can be downloaded from:
 http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/arm-nightlies/vault/f18-beta-tc1/
 
 Please help us track the results by adding your findings to:
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Quality_Assurance/2012-12-03-VFAD-Fedora_18_Beta
 
 All help is appreciated and we look forward to your participation. 
 
 Thanks,
 Paul
 -- 
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
 -- 
 Later,
 
 Lukas lzap Zapletal
 #katello #systemengine
 -- 
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: comps' standard group spring cleaning?

2013-01-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 14:11 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
 Once upon a time, john.flor...@dart.biz john.flor...@dart.biz said:
  I use finger effectively without a finger server, on a single-user 
  workstation (in multi-user mode, of course).  I believe it's getting the 
  data via NSS and in my case that means LDAP.  That's not too esoteric 
  IMHO.
 
 Yeah, finger is kind of a multi-purpose tool.  It can show logged-in
 users as well as fetch info about any user.

Sadly, it appears you can't finger John Carmack any more. He's gone all
shy.

(I think that still worked up to at least 2005 or so).
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2013-01-09)

2013-01-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:15 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:

 * #963 change of names of configuration files  (jwb, 18:15:11)
   * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/963   (jwb, 18:15:12)
   * AGREED: firstboot is fixed so closing the ticket out and maintainers
 can fix remaining in the normal cycle (+:9,0:0,-:0)  (jwb, 18:17:18)
   * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mitr/SystemwideFeatures
 already contains this in the scope section  (mitr, 18:20:48)

Sorry I wasn't at the meeting, but it _is_ worth noting that some of the
borkage from this is relatively serious. For instance,
system-config-keyboard is entirely screwed in F18: it will apply a
chosen keyboard layout for the rest of a session but it can no longer
correctly apply it persistently, you'll lose the setting on reboot.
(It's still writing the old filename in the old format). At minimum it
needs to be fixed to write the console layout name to /etc/vconsole.conf
correctly, since it's too late to drop it, now.

GNOME can apply a keyboard config you set via GNOME Control Center
systemwide, using localectl. I'm not sure KDE, Xfce, LXDE or other
desktops have any ability to do this, though, so if you're running one
of those, your only option for setting a system-wide keyboard config may
be calling localectl or editing vconsole.conf directly.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Package EVR problems in Fedora 2013-01-12

2013-01-11 Thread buildsys
Broken upgrade path report for tags f18 - f18-updates - f19:
NetworkManager:
f18  f19 (1:NetworkManager-0.9.7.0-12.git20121004.fc18 
1:NetworkManager-0.9.7.0-11.git20121211.fc19)

a2jmidid:
f18  f19 (a2jmidid-8-3.fc18 a2jmidid-8-2.fc19)

anaconda:
f18  f19 (anaconda-18.37.11-1.fc18 anaconda-18.11-1.fc19)

avgtime:
f18  f19 (avgtime-0-0.4.git20120724.fc18 avgtime-0-0.3.git20120724.fc19)

cloud-init:
f18  f19 (cloud-init-0.7.1-2.fc18 cloud-init-0.7.0-1.fc18)

darktable:
f18-updates  f19 (darktable-1.1.1-1.fc18 darktable-1.1-0.1.rc1.fc19)

dmlite:
f18  f19 (dmlite-0.4.2-2.fc18 dmlite-0.4.2-1.fc19)

dracut-modules-olpc:
f18  f19 (dracut-modules-olpc-0.7.5-1.fc18 
dracut-modules-olpc-0.7.1-1.fc19)
f18-updates  f19 (dracut-modules-olpc-0.7.6-1.fc18 
dracut-modules-olpc-0.7.1-1.fc19)

fedora-release-notes:
f18  f19 (fedora-release-notes-18.0.0-3.fc18 
fedora-release-notes-17.95.0-0.fc19)

firewalld:
f18  f19 (firewalld-0.2.11-2.fc18 firewalld-0.2.11-1.fc19)

firstboot:
f18  f19 (firstboot-18.6-2.fc18 firstboot-18.6-1.fc19)

ghc-editline:
f18  f19 (ghc-editline-0.2.1.1-2.fc18 ghc-editline-0.2.1.1-1.fc19)

girara:
f18  f19 (girara-0.1.4-2.fc18 girara-0.1.4-1.fc19)

gobby:
f18  f19 (gobby-0.4.12-9.fc18 gobby-0.4.12-8.fc19)

gqradio:
f18  f19 (gqradio-1.9.2-11.fc18 gqradio-1.9.2-10.fc19)

grub2:
f18  f19 (1:grub2-2.00-13.fc18 1:grub2-2.00-12.fc19)
f18-updates  f19 (1:grub2-2.00-15.fc18 1:grub2-2.00-12.fc19)

gtkhtml3:
f18  f19 (gtkhtml3-4.6.1-1.fc18 gtkhtml3-4.5.91-1.fc19)

jlatexmath:
f18  f19 (jlatexmath-1.0.0-2.fc18 jlatexmath-1.0.0-1.fc19)

kdegames:
f18  f19 (6:kdegames-4.9.4-1.fc18 6:kdegames-4.9.3-1.fc19)

liberation-fonts:
f18  f19 (1:liberation-fonts-1.07.2-12.fc18 liberation-fonts-2.00.1-4.fc19)

libestr:
f18-updates  f19 (libestr-0.1.4-1.fc18 libestr-0.1.3-3.fc19)

libkgapi:
f18-updates  f19 (libkgapi-0.4.4-1.fc18 libkgapi-0.4.3-3.fc19)

liblognorm:
f18-updates  f19 (liblognorm-0.3.5-1.fc18 liblognorm-0.3.4-4.fc19)

libmatekbd:
f18-updates  f19 (libmatekbd-1.5.0-2.fc18 libmatekbd-1.5.0-1.fc19)

libotr3:
f18  f19 (libotr3-3.2.1-4.fc18 libotr3-3.2.1-3.fc19)

libva:
f18  f19 (libva-1.1.0-5.fc18 libva-1.1.0-3.fc19)

lorax:
f18  f19 (lorax-18.29-1.fc18 lorax-18.22-2.fc19)

maliit-framework:
f18  f19 (maliit-framework-0.93.1-1.fc18 maliit-framework-0.93.0-1.fc19)

mate-dialogs:
f18  f19 (mate-dialogs-1.5.0-2.fc18 mate-dialogs-1.5.0-1.fc19)

network-manager-applet:
f18-updates  f19 (network-manager-applet-0.9.7.0-6.git20121211.fc18 
network-manager-applet-0.9.7.0-5.git20121211.fc19)

ocaml-calendar:
f18-updates  f19 (ocaml-calendar-2.03.2-2.fc18 
ocaml-calendar-2.03.2-1.fc19)

ocaml-curses:
f18-updates  f19 (ocaml-curses-1.0.3-15.fc18 ocaml-curses-1.0.3-14.fc19)

ocaml-fileutils:
f18-updates  f19 (ocaml-fileutils-0.4.4-4.fc18 
ocaml-fileutils-0.4.4-2.fc19)

ocaml-gettext:
f18-updates  f19 (ocaml-gettext-0.3.4-8.fc18 ocaml-gettext-0.3.4-7.fc19)

ocaml-xml-light:
f18-updates  f19 (ocaml-xml-light-2.3-0.3.svn234.fc18 
ocaml-xml-light-2.3-0.2.svn234.fc19)

olpc-kbdshim:
f18  f19 (olpc-kbdshim-29-1.fc18 olpc-kbdshim-28-1.fc19)

ovirt-engine:
f18-updates  f19 (ovirt-engine-3.1.0-2.fc18 ovirt-engine-3.1.0-1.fc19)

plplot:
f18-updates  f19 (plplot-5.9.9-12.svn12202.fc18 
plplot-5.9.9-11.svn12202.fc19)

presence:
f18  f19 (presence-0.4.8-4.fc18 presence-0.4.8-1.fc19)

python-py9p:
f18  f19 (python-py9p-1.0.5-1.fc18 python-py9p-1.0.2-1.fc19)

python-pyvfs:
f18  f19 (python-pyvfs-0.2.7-1.fc18 python-pyvfs-0.2.5-1.fc19)

python-urwid:
f18  f19 (python-urwid-1.1.1-1.fc18 python-urwid-1.0.0-7.fc19)

qemu:
f18-updates  f19 (2:qemu-1.2.2-1.fc18 2:qemu-1.2.0-25.fc19)

qpid-cpp:
f18  f19 (qpid-cpp-0.18-6.fc18 qpid-cpp-0.18-5.fc19)

rubygem-clouddb:
f18  f19 (rubygem-clouddb-0.0.1-3.fc18 rubygem-clouddb-0.0.1-2.fc19)

scala:
f18  f19 (scala-2.9.2-3.fc18 scala-2.9.2-2.fc19)

scsi-target-utils:
f18  f19 (scsi-target-utils-1.0.32-2.fc18 scsi-target-utils-1.0.32-1.fc19)

spice-gtk:
f18-updates  f19 (spice-gtk-0.15.3-1.fc18 spice-gtk-0.15-1.fc19)

sugar:
f18  f19 (sugar-0.98.3-1.fc18 sugar-0.98.2-1.fc19)

sugar-nutrition:
f18  f19 (sugar-nutrition-9-1.fc18 sugar-nutrition-7-1.fc19)

sugar-portfolio:
f18  f19 (sugar-portfolio-35-2.fc18 sugar-portfolio-33-2.fc19)

sugar-toolkit-gtk3:
f18  f19 (sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.98.3-1.fc18 
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.98.2-1.fc19)

telepathy-logger:
f18  f19 (telepathy-logger-0.6.0-3.fc18 telepathy-logger-0.6.0-2.fc19)

trac-iniadmin-plugin:
f18  f19 (trac-iniadmin-plugin-0.2-4.20101209svn9652.fc18 
trac-iniadmin-plugin-0.2-1.20120808svn11914.fc19)

xmonad:
f18-updates  f19 (xmonad-0.10-17.fc18 xmonad-0.10-16.fc19)

xorg-x11-drv-ati:
f18  f19 (xorg-x11-drv-ati-7.0.0-0.6.20120910git7c7f27756.fc18 
xorg-x11-drv-ati-7.0.0-0.4.20120629git5ebebfdb4.fc19)
f18-updates  f19 

Re: Fedora Windows Spice/Virtio KVM drivers and tools (was Re: Red Hat QXL GPU Driver for Windows 7?)

2013-01-11 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:39:06PM +0100, Simone Caronni wrote:
 I'm not asking for WHQL as I understand this is a benefit for the Redhat
 subscriptions.

Actually WHQL simply cannot be done by Fedora even if we wanted to.
It's an MSFT test programme that costs money, plus MSFT refuse to do
it for GPL drivers.

However we could write a trivial virt-win-reg script which would
disable signing in a Windows VM automatically, so this shouldn't be a
problem.

- - -

Do the virtio drivers now build using the mingw-* stack in Fedora?
IIRC this should be possible now that Fedora has switched over to
using mingw-w64.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rawhide report: 20130111 changes

2013-01-11 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:50:18PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
 [libguestfs]
   1:libguestfs-1.21.2-2.fc19.i686 requires libprocps.so.0
   1:libguestfs-1.21.2-2.fc19.x86_64 requires libprocps.so.0()(64bit)

Unfortunately FTBFS because of some incompatible change to the Ruby
package in Fedora 19:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894545

I'll try and have a look at this later in the coming week.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Fwd: [Design-team] gnome-shell design bug!

2013-01-11 Thread Christopher Meng
-- 转发的消息 --
发件人:Marco Scannadinari ma...@scannadinari.co.uk
日期:2013-1-12 AM3:59
主题:[Design-team] gnome-shell design bug!
收件人: design-t...@lists.fedoraproject.org
抄送:

Hi, none of you know me - I just joined the mailing list. Everyone can
call me zheøffec (pronnounced jeff).

I just reported a bug here
(https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691578) , is there the right
place to report it? It's about the highlight over an application with
its corners not being round enough. Thanks ;)

___
design-team mailing list
design-t...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2013-01-12

2013-01-11 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:04:54AM +, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
 ocaml-calendar:
 f18-updates  f19 (ocaml-calendar-2.03.2-2.fc18 
 ocaml-calendar-2.03.2-1.fc19)
 
 ocaml-curses:
 f18-updates  f19 (ocaml-curses-1.0.3-15.fc18 ocaml-curses-1.0.3-14.fc19)
 
 ocaml-fileutils:
 f18-updates  f19 (ocaml-fileutils-0.4.4-4.fc18 
 ocaml-fileutils-0.4.4-2.fc19)
 
 ocaml-gettext:
 f18-updates  f19 (ocaml-gettext-0.3.4-8.fc18 ocaml-gettext-0.3.4-7.fc19)
 
 ocaml-xml-light:
 f18-updates  f19 (ocaml-xml-light-2.3-0.3.svn234.fc18 
 ocaml-xml-light-2.3-0.2.svn234.fc19)

When I did the big OCaml codegen fix/update in F18 recently, I just
bumped these package versions in Rawhide, merged the change back to
F18, and rebuilt them only in F18.  The upshot is that these aren't
really a problem now and will fix themselves through routine updates
over time.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2013-01-12

2013-01-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 02:53:06 +
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:

 When I did the big OCaml codegen fix/update in F18 recently, I just
 bumped these package versions in Rawhide, merged the change back to
 F18, and rebuilt them only in F18.  The upshot is that these aren't
 really a problem now and will fix themselves through routine updates
 over time.

Why not build them in rawhide? The codegen fix went in sooner there?

Note that in the future to avoid this: 

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches

Personally, I'd say just rebuild them in rawhide, since people yum
upgrading from f18 would hit this and rawhide doesn't mind rebuilds. :) 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

File Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.12.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2013-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP:

e462400b61c475143d3980ec1d74629a  Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP] 1.12 bump

2013-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 13fdc083a09a5d29330719ca8637c704f8c88c4d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Fri Jan 11 10:07:55 2013 +0100

1.12 bump

 .gitignore|1 +
 perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP.spec |   47 +---
 sources   |2 +-
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e687c59..51c5683 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.08.tar.gz
 /Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.10.tar.gz
+/Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.12.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP.spec b/perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP.spec
index 3024ed7..639abb9 100644
--- a/perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP.spec
+++ b/perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP.spec
@@ -1,30 +1,39 @@
 Name:   perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP
-Version:1.10
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Version:1.12
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:POE Component providing TCP client services for test cases
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-POE-Client-TCP/
 Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/B/BI/BINGOS/Test-POE-Client-TCP-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildRoot:  %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 BuildArch:  noarch
-BuildRequires:  perl = 1:5.6.0
-BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.42
+BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.30
+# Run-time:
+BuildRequires:  perl(Carp)
 # Original perl(POE) = 1.28 rounded to 3 digits
 BuildRequires:  perl(POE) = 1.280
-BuildRequires:  perl(POE::Filter)
 BuildRequires:  perl(POE::Filter::Line)
 BuildRequires:  perl(POE::Wheel::ReadWrite)
 BuildRequires:  perl(POE::Wheel::SocketFactory)
+BuildRequires:  perl(POSIX)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Socket)
+# Tests:
+BuildRequires:  perl(base)
+BuildRequires:  perl(File::Find)
+BuildRequires:  perl(File::Temp)
+BuildRequires:  perl(POE::Filter)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) = 0.47
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod) = 1.0
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) = 1.0
+BuildRequires:  perl(Text::ParseWords)
+# Optional tests:
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Script) = 1.05
+Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
 Requires:   perl(POE) = 1.280
-Requires:   perl(POE::Filter)
 Requires:   perl(POE::Filter::Line)
 Requires:   perl(POE::Wheel::ReadWrite)
 Requires:   perl(POE::Wheel::SocketFactory)
-Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
+
+# Filter under-specified dependencies
+%global __requires_exclude 
%{?__requires_exclude:%__requires_exclude|}^perl\\(POE\\)$
 
 %description
 Test::POE::Client::TCP is a POE component that provides a TCP client
@@ -35,32 +44,26 @@ to roll your own.
 %setup -q -n Test-POE-Client-TCP-%{version}
 
 %build
-%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
 make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
-make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
+make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
-
 %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
 
 %check
 make test
 
-%clean
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
 %files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
-%doc Changes examples LICENSE README
+%doc Changes Changes.old examples LICENSE README
 %{perl_vendorlib}/*
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Jan 11 2013 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.12-1
+- 1.12 bump
+
 * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
- 1.10-5
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 6ed36ee..c03f28c 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-2b5f417ee84dc2ece39663a0e21f4157  Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.10.tar.gz
+e462400b61c475143d3980ec1d74629a  Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 894195] duplicate directory ownership with perl-libs and perl

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894195

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
It should, but currently `perl' package contains a lot files residing in the
directory. This will be fixed once `perl' package will own no files there.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XlfPnYBONfa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 894179] perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.12 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894179

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.
   ||12-1.fc19
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2013-01-11 04:17:10

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tnwuOSdQRea=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 894270] New: perl-Growl-GNTP-0.16 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894270

Bug ID: 894270
   Summary: perl-Growl-GNTP-0.16 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-Growl-GNTP
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Severity: unspecified
  Priority: unspecified
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org

Latest upstream release: 0.16
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.15
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Growl-GNTP/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IxLJAcJ5P0a=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 894271] New: perl-MogileFS-Utils-2.27 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894271

Bug ID: 894271
   Summary: perl-MogileFS-Utils-2.27 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-MogileFS-Utils
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Severity: unspecified
  Priority: unspecified
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org

Latest upstream release: 2.27
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 2.26
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MogileFS-Utils/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9r0rzBlftpa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File MogileFS-Utils-2.27.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2013-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MogileFS-Utils:

9a115213687f651ff7279337d436ace1  MogileFS-Utils-2.27.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MogileFS-Utils] 2.27 bump

2013-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 5aba4d0fb0ad5b467fb1bf36395fbb9c8e4eaf75
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Fri Jan 11 10:55:59 2013 +0100

2.27 bump

 .gitignore   |1 +
 perl-MogileFS-Utils.spec |   11 +++
 sources  |2 +-
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 362efe9..9743bc6 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ MogileFS-Utils-2.16.tar.gz
 /MogileFS-Utils-2.24.tar.gz
 /MogileFS-Utils-2.25.tar.gz
 /MogileFS-Utils-2.26.tar.gz
+/MogileFS-Utils-2.27.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-MogileFS-Utils.spec b/perl-MogileFS-Utils.spec
index 854fb0a..6eddf9b 100644
--- a/perl-MogileFS-Utils.spec
+++ b/perl-MogileFS-Utils.spec
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 %global cpan_name MogileFS-Utils
 
 Name:   perl-%{cpan_name}
-Version:2.26
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:2.27
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Utilities for MogileFS
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 # perl(MogileFS::Client) = 1.16
 # perl(Compress::Zlib)
 # perl(LWP::Simple)
-Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
+Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
 Requires:   perl(MogileFS::Client) = 1.16
 
 # Remove under-specified dependencies
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Utilities for the MogileFS distributed storage system.
 %setup -q -n %{cpan_name}-%{version}
 
 %build
-%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
 make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags} test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Jan 11 2013 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.27-1
+- 2.27 bump
+
 * Wed Oct 24 2012 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 2.26-3
 - Parallelize all make runs
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 6d88ff8..34fdd58 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-48cab97f423d535c921420a7b8d12cf5  MogileFS-Utils-2.26.tar.gz
+9a115213687f651ff7279337d436ace1  MogileFS-Utils-2.27.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 894271] perl-MogileFS-Utils-2.27 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894271

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-MogileFS-Utils-2.27-1.
   ||fc19
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2013-01-11 05:05:07

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AZXuW17KK7a=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 884354] CVE-2012-6329 perl: possible arbitrary code execution via Locale::Maketext

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884354

--- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 676781
  -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=676781action=edit
Upstream fix

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IJ59hBbXLQa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 894195] duplicate directory ownership with perl-libs and perl

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894195

--- Comment #2 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
Well, perl requires perl-libs, so the directory would not be unowned in any
case ?
( and sorry to have waited to enter this bug, as you have already pushed a
update for another issue )

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8WAehjZ15Ga=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 894195] duplicate directory ownership with perl-libs and perl

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894195

--- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to comment #2)
 Well, perl requires perl-libs, so the directory would not be unowned in any
 case ?
Are you sure this is correct? I am not.

Actually I think it's a case where dual ownership is correct.

 ( and sorry to have waited to enter this bug, as you have already pushed a
 update for another issue )
Well, technically there is nothing wrong with the directory being owned by both
packages.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CGNlWUFWaka=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File Growl-GNTP-0.16.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by churchyard

2013-01-11 Thread Miro Hrončok
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Growl-GNTP:

c65c0d385c511979001eb0b55d90d159  Growl-GNTP-0.16.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-Growl-GNTP] Upstream release 0.16

2013-01-11 Thread Miro Hrončok
commit 3182ceb46db57938a13bc148ff58c5be1400
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date:   Fri Jan 11 13:17:18 2013 +0100

Upstream release 0.16

 .gitignore   |1 +
 perl-Growl-GNTP.spec |7 +--
 sources  |2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 1ddaa26..e63ab71 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 /Growl-GNTP-0.15.tar.gz
+/Growl-GNTP-0.16.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Growl-GNTP.spec b/perl-Growl-GNTP.spec
index 03bc5cb..8d0ae4d 100644
--- a/perl-Growl-GNTP.spec
+++ b/perl-Growl-GNTP.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-Growl-GNTP
-Version:0.15
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Version:0.16
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Perl implementation of GNTP Protocol (Client Part)
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Jan 11 2013 Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com - 0.16-1
+- New version
+
 * Tue Nov 20 2012 Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz - 0.15-4
 - perl(inc::Module::Install) to perl(Module::Install)
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 6f4d08a..a5f6b34 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-12e0588b267015d17ae258bf74874913  Growl-GNTP-0.15.tar.gz
+c65c0d385c511979001eb0b55d90d159  Growl-GNTP-0.16.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 894195] duplicate directory ownership with perl-libs and perl

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894195

--- Comment #4 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
From my chroot :

# rpm -q --requires perl | grep libs
perl-libs
perl-libs = 4:5.16.2-244.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GK9OUtp9fKa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 894270] perl-Growl-GNTP-0.16 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894270

Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2013-01-11 07:32:41

--- Comment #1 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com ---
Now in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4859643

Won't push to stable, unless anyone asks to.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=21Uv3hlHqva=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl] Fix CVE-2012-6329

2013-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
commit add42744d75d737dcb493ba01b05683774174465
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Fri Jan 11 13:42:11 2013 +0100

Fix CVE-2012-6329

 ...5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch |   81 
 perl.spec  |   10 ++-
 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch 
b/perl-5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..9a8629f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+From 1735f6f53ca19f99c6e9e39496c486af323ba6a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Brian Carlson brian.carl...@cpanel.net
+Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:54:33 -0500
+Subject: [PATCH] Fix misparsing of maketext strings.
+
+Case 61251: This commit fixes a misparse of maketext strings that could
+lead to arbitrary code execution.  Basically, maketext was compiling
+bracket notation into functions, but neglected to escape backslashes
+inside the content or die on fully-qualified method names when
+generating the code.  This change escapes all such backslashes and dies
+when a method name with a colon or apostrophe is specified.
+---
+ AUTHORS |  1 +
+ dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm | 24 
+ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/AUTHORS b/AUTHORS
+index 70734b0..009dea0 100644
+--- a/AUTHORS
 b/AUTHORS
+@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ Breno G. de Oliveira   g...@cpan.org
+ Brent Dax brent...@cpan.org
+ Brooks D Boyd
+ Brian Callaghan   call...@itginc.com
++Brian Carlson brian.carl...@cpanel.net
+ Brian Clarke  cla...@appliedmeta.com
+ brian d foy   brian.d@gmail.com
+ Brian Fraser  frase...@gmail.com
+diff --git a/dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm 
b/dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm
+index 4822027..63e5fba 100644
+--- a/dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm
 b/dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm
+@@ -625,21 +625,9 @@ sub _compile {
+ # 0-length method name means to just interpolate:
+ push @code, ' (';
+ }
+-elsif($m =~ /^\w+(?:\:\:\w+)*$/s
+-and $m !~ m/(?:^|\:)\d/s
+-# exclude starting a (sub)package or symbol with a 
digit
++elsif($m =~ /^\w+$/s
++# exclude anything fancy, especially fully-qualified 
module names
+ ) {
+-# Yes, it even supports the demented (and 
undocumented?)
+-#  $obj-Foo::bar(...) syntax.
+-$target-_die_pointing(
+-$string_to_compile, q{Can't use SUPER:: in a 
bracket-group method},
+-2 + length($c[-1])
+-)
+-if $m =~ m/^SUPER::/s;
+-# Because for SUPER:: to work, we'd have to compile 
this into
+-#  the right package, and that seems just not worth 
the bother,
+-#  unless someone convinces me otherwise.
+-
+ push @code, ' $_[0]-' . $m . '(';
+ }
+ else {
+@@ -693,7 +681,9 @@ sub _compile {
+ elsif(substr($1,0,1) ne '~') {
+ # it's stuff not containing ~ or [ or ]
+ # i.e., a literal blob
+-$c[-1] .= $1;
++my $text = $1;
++$text =~ s/\\//g;
++$c[-1] .= $text;
+ 
+ }
+ elsif($1 eq '~~') { # ~~
+@@ -731,7 +721,9 @@ sub _compile {
+ else {
+ # It's a ~X where X is not a special character.
+ # Consider it a literal ~ and X.
+-$c[-1] .= $1;
++my $text = $1;
++$text =~ s/\\//g;
++$c[-1] .= $text;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+-- 
+1.7.11.7
+
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index d071ddc..1ed6a6c 100644
--- a/perl.spec
+++ b/perl.spec
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 Name:   perl
 Version:%{perl_version}
 # release number must be even higher, because dual-lived modules will be 
broken otherwise
-Release:245%{?dist}
+Release:246%{?dist}
 Epoch:  %{perl_epoch}
 Summary:Practical Extraction and Report Language
 Group:  Development/Languages
@@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ Patch18:
perl-5.16.1-perl-114984-Glob.xs-Extend-stack-when-returning.patc
 # Do not crash when vivifying $|, rhbz#865296, RT#115206
 Patch19:perl-5.16.1-perl-115206-Don-t-crash-when-vivifying.patch
 
+# Fix CVE-2012-6329, rhbz#884354
+Patch20:

[Bug 884363] perl: possible arbitrary code execution via Locale::Maketext [fedora-all]

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884363

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|mmasl...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Fjmi6yLrGga=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl/f18] Fix CVE-2012-6329

2013-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 6b14b9a82d9cf796ce290dbc29078f5471cb4147
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Fri Jan 11 13:42:11 2013 +0100

Fix CVE-2012-6329

 ...5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch |   81 
 perl.spec  |   10 ++-
 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch 
b/perl-5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..9a8629f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+From 1735f6f53ca19f99c6e9e39496c486af323ba6a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Brian Carlson brian.carl...@cpanel.net
+Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:54:33 -0500
+Subject: [PATCH] Fix misparsing of maketext strings.
+
+Case 61251: This commit fixes a misparse of maketext strings that could
+lead to arbitrary code execution.  Basically, maketext was compiling
+bracket notation into functions, but neglected to escape backslashes
+inside the content or die on fully-qualified method names when
+generating the code.  This change escapes all such backslashes and dies
+when a method name with a colon or apostrophe is specified.
+---
+ AUTHORS |  1 +
+ dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm | 24 
+ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/AUTHORS b/AUTHORS
+index 70734b0..009dea0 100644
+--- a/AUTHORS
 b/AUTHORS
+@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ Breno G. de Oliveira   g...@cpan.org
+ Brent Dax brent...@cpan.org
+ Brooks D Boyd
+ Brian Callaghan   call...@itginc.com
++Brian Carlson brian.carl...@cpanel.net
+ Brian Clarke  cla...@appliedmeta.com
+ brian d foy   brian.d@gmail.com
+ Brian Fraser  frase...@gmail.com
+diff --git a/dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm 
b/dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm
+index 4822027..63e5fba 100644
+--- a/dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm
 b/dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm
+@@ -625,21 +625,9 @@ sub _compile {
+ # 0-length method name means to just interpolate:
+ push @code, ' (';
+ }
+-elsif($m =~ /^\w+(?:\:\:\w+)*$/s
+-and $m !~ m/(?:^|\:)\d/s
+-# exclude starting a (sub)package or symbol with a 
digit
++elsif($m =~ /^\w+$/s
++# exclude anything fancy, especially fully-qualified 
module names
+ ) {
+-# Yes, it even supports the demented (and 
undocumented?)
+-#  $obj-Foo::bar(...) syntax.
+-$target-_die_pointing(
+-$string_to_compile, q{Can't use SUPER:: in a 
bracket-group method},
+-2 + length($c[-1])
+-)
+-if $m =~ m/^SUPER::/s;
+-# Because for SUPER:: to work, we'd have to compile 
this into
+-#  the right package, and that seems just not worth 
the bother,
+-#  unless someone convinces me otherwise.
+-
+ push @code, ' $_[0]-' . $m . '(';
+ }
+ else {
+@@ -693,7 +681,9 @@ sub _compile {
+ elsif(substr($1,0,1) ne '~') {
+ # it's stuff not containing ~ or [ or ]
+ # i.e., a literal blob
+-$c[-1] .= $1;
++my $text = $1;
++$text =~ s/\\//g;
++$c[-1] .= $text;
+ 
+ }
+ elsif($1 eq '~~') { # ~~
+@@ -731,7 +721,9 @@ sub _compile {
+ else {
+ # It's a ~X where X is not a special character.
+ # Consider it a literal ~ and X.
+-$c[-1] .= $1;
++my $text = $1;
++$text =~ s/\\//g;
++$c[-1] .= $text;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+-- 
+1.7.11.7
+
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index f20973a..42e79e9 100644
--- a/perl.spec
+++ b/perl.spec
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 Name:   perl
 Version:%{perl_version}
 # release number must be even higher, because dual-lived modules will be 
broken otherwise
-Release:236%{?dist}
+Release:237%{?dist}
 Epoch:  %{perl_epoch}
 Summary:Practical Extraction and Report Language
 Group:  Development/Languages
@@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ Patch18:
perl-5.16.1-perl-114984-Glob.xs-Extend-stack-when-returning.patc
 # Do not crash when vivifying $|, rhbz#865296, RT#115206
 Patch19:perl-5.16.1-perl-115206-Don-t-crash-when-vivifying.patch
 
+# Fix CVE-2012-6329, rhbz#884354
+Patch20:

[perl/f17] Fix CVE-2012-6329

2013-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 07cc42ddefaa295b1a194d6a20d47f7da554eb73
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Fri Jan 11 13:42:11 2013 +0100

Fix CVE-2012-6329

 ...5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch |   81 
 perl.spec  |   10 ++-
 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch 
b/perl-5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..9a8629f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+From 1735f6f53ca19f99c6e9e39496c486af323ba6a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Brian Carlson brian.carl...@cpanel.net
+Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:54:33 -0500
+Subject: [PATCH] Fix misparsing of maketext strings.
+
+Case 61251: This commit fixes a misparse of maketext strings that could
+lead to arbitrary code execution.  Basically, maketext was compiling
+bracket notation into functions, but neglected to escape backslashes
+inside the content or die on fully-qualified method names when
+generating the code.  This change escapes all such backslashes and dies
+when a method name with a colon or apostrophe is specified.
+---
+ AUTHORS |  1 +
+ dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm | 24 
+ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/AUTHORS b/AUTHORS
+index 70734b0..009dea0 100644
+--- a/AUTHORS
 b/AUTHORS
+@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ Breno G. de Oliveira   g...@cpan.org
+ Brent Dax brent...@cpan.org
+ Brooks D Boyd
+ Brian Callaghan   call...@itginc.com
++Brian Carlson brian.carl...@cpanel.net
+ Brian Clarke  cla...@appliedmeta.com
+ brian d foy   brian.d@gmail.com
+ Brian Fraser  frase...@gmail.com
+diff --git a/dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm 
b/dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm
+index 4822027..63e5fba 100644
+--- a/dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm
 b/dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm
+@@ -625,21 +625,9 @@ sub _compile {
+ # 0-length method name means to just interpolate:
+ push @code, ' (';
+ }
+-elsif($m =~ /^\w+(?:\:\:\w+)*$/s
+-and $m !~ m/(?:^|\:)\d/s
+-# exclude starting a (sub)package or symbol with a 
digit
++elsif($m =~ /^\w+$/s
++# exclude anything fancy, especially fully-qualified 
module names
+ ) {
+-# Yes, it even supports the demented (and 
undocumented?)
+-#  $obj-Foo::bar(...) syntax.
+-$target-_die_pointing(
+-$string_to_compile, q{Can't use SUPER:: in a 
bracket-group method},
+-2 + length($c[-1])
+-)
+-if $m =~ m/^SUPER::/s;
+-# Because for SUPER:: to work, we'd have to compile 
this into
+-#  the right package, and that seems just not worth 
the bother,
+-#  unless someone convinces me otherwise.
+-
+ push @code, ' $_[0]-' . $m . '(';
+ }
+ else {
+@@ -693,7 +681,9 @@ sub _compile {
+ elsif(substr($1,0,1) ne '~') {
+ # it's stuff not containing ~ or [ or ]
+ # i.e., a literal blob
+-$c[-1] .= $1;
++my $text = $1;
++$text =~ s/\\//g;
++$c[-1] .= $text;
+ 
+ }
+ elsif($1 eq '~~') { # ~~
+@@ -731,7 +721,9 @@ sub _compile {
+ else {
+ # It's a ~X where X is not a special character.
+ # Consider it a literal ~ and X.
+-$c[-1] .= $1;
++my $text = $1;
++$text =~ s/\\//g;
++$c[-1] .= $text;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+-- 
+1.7.11.7
+
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index be0a97e..fa04952 100644
--- a/perl.spec
+++ b/perl.spec
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 Name:   perl
 Version:%{perl_version}
 # release number must be even higher, because dual-lived modules will be 
broken otherwise
-Release:219%{?dist}
+Release:220%{?dist}
 Epoch:  %{perl_epoch}
 Summary:Practical Extraction and Report Language
 Group:  Development/Languages
@@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ Patch20:
perl-5.14.2-perl-100340-Free-hash-entries-before-values-on-delet
 # podlators-2.4.1
 Patch21:perl-5.14.2-Override-the-Pod-Simple-parse_file.patch
 
+# Fix CVE-2012-6329, rhbz#884354
+Patch22:perl-5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch
+
 # Update some of the bundled 

[perl/f16] Fix CVE-2012-6329

2013-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 900478ee676e4edd4225f1a569707385586dc8f3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date:   Fri Jan 11 13:42:11 2013 +0100

Fix CVE-2012-6329

 ...5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch |   81 
 perl.spec  |   10 ++-
 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch 
b/perl-5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..9a8629f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+From 1735f6f53ca19f99c6e9e39496c486af323ba6a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Brian Carlson brian.carl...@cpanel.net
+Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:54:33 -0500
+Subject: [PATCH] Fix misparsing of maketext strings.
+
+Case 61251: This commit fixes a misparse of maketext strings that could
+lead to arbitrary code execution.  Basically, maketext was compiling
+bracket notation into functions, but neglected to escape backslashes
+inside the content or die on fully-qualified method names when
+generating the code.  This change escapes all such backslashes and dies
+when a method name with a colon or apostrophe is specified.
+---
+ AUTHORS |  1 +
+ dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm | 24 
+ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/AUTHORS b/AUTHORS
+index 70734b0..009dea0 100644
+--- a/AUTHORS
 b/AUTHORS
+@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ Breno G. de Oliveira   g...@cpan.org
+ Brent Dax brent...@cpan.org
+ Brooks D Boyd
+ Brian Callaghan   call...@itginc.com
++Brian Carlson brian.carl...@cpanel.net
+ Brian Clarke  cla...@appliedmeta.com
+ brian d foy   brian.d@gmail.com
+ Brian Fraser  frase...@gmail.com
+diff --git a/dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm 
b/dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm
+index 4822027..63e5fba 100644
+--- a/dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm
 b/dist/Locale-Maketext/lib/Locale/Maketext.pm
+@@ -625,21 +625,9 @@ sub _compile {
+ # 0-length method name means to just interpolate:
+ push @code, ' (';
+ }
+-elsif($m =~ /^\w+(?:\:\:\w+)*$/s
+-and $m !~ m/(?:^|\:)\d/s
+-# exclude starting a (sub)package or symbol with a 
digit
++elsif($m =~ /^\w+$/s
++# exclude anything fancy, especially fully-qualified 
module names
+ ) {
+-# Yes, it even supports the demented (and 
undocumented?)
+-#  $obj-Foo::bar(...) syntax.
+-$target-_die_pointing(
+-$string_to_compile, q{Can't use SUPER:: in a 
bracket-group method},
+-2 + length($c[-1])
+-)
+-if $m =~ m/^SUPER::/s;
+-# Because for SUPER:: to work, we'd have to compile 
this into
+-#  the right package, and that seems just not worth 
the bother,
+-#  unless someone convinces me otherwise.
+-
+ push @code, ' $_[0]-' . $m . '(';
+ }
+ else {
+@@ -693,7 +681,9 @@ sub _compile {
+ elsif(substr($1,0,1) ne '~') {
+ # it's stuff not containing ~ or [ or ]
+ # i.e., a literal blob
+-$c[-1] .= $1;
++my $text = $1;
++$text =~ s/\\//g;
++$c[-1] .= $text;
+ 
+ }
+ elsif($1 eq '~~') { # ~~
+@@ -731,7 +721,9 @@ sub _compile {
+ else {
+ # It's a ~X where X is not a special character.
+ # Consider it a literal ~ and X.
+-$c[-1] .= $1;
++my $text = $1;
++$text =~ s/\\//g;
++$c[-1] .= $text;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+-- 
+1.7.11.7
+
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index a4d6ebb..b142c60 100644
--- a/perl.spec
+++ b/perl.spec
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
 Name:   perl
 Version:%{perl_version}
 # release number must be even higher, because dual-lived modules will be 
broken otherwise
-Release:204%{?dist}
+Release:205%{?dist}
 Epoch:  %{perl_epoch}
 Summary:Practical Extraction and Report Language
 Group:  Development/Languages
@@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ Patch20:
perl-5.14.2-perl-100340-Free-hash-entries-before-values-on-delet
 # podlators-2.4.1
 Patch21:perl-5.14.2-Override-the-Pod-Simple-parse_file.patch
 
+# Fix CVE-2012-6329, rhbz#884354
+Patch22:perl-5.17.6-Fix-misparsing-of-maketext-strings.patch
+
 # Update some of the bundled 

[Bug 884363] perl: possible arbitrary code execution via Locale::Maketext [fedora-all]

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884363

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-5.16.2-246.fc19

--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Fixed as perl-5.16.2-246.fc19 in F19.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QZGqK1cFEUa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 884363] perl: possible arbitrary code execution via Locale::Maketext [fedora-all]

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884363

--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-5.16.2-237.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.16.2-237.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ov5WknMuXra=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 893768] /usr/share/man/man3/App::Cpan.3pm.gz is duplicated between perl-CPAN and perl-Test-Harness

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893768

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-5.16.2-237.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.16.2-237.fc18

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=veJi09uIB1a=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 884363] perl: possible arbitrary code execution via Locale::Maketext [fedora-all]

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884363

--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-5.14.3-205.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.14.3-205.fc16

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LXrUoz21Eca=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 884363] perl: possible arbitrary code execution via Locale::Maketext [fedora-all]

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884363

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-5.14.3-220.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.14.3-220.fc17

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rBpqjguW7aa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

File MIME-Types-1.38.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2013-01-11 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MIME-Types:

994baebea02be46123cc888da5b32b8d  MIME-Types-1.38.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MIME-Types] Update to 1.38

2013-01-11 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 8c99be467b5ef06e73ede4fb793e0f6ac3b8090e
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Fri Jan 11 13:46:06 2013 +

Update to 1.38

- New upstream release 1.38:
  - Add application/vnd.ms-excel.template.macroEnabled.12 and five related
from http://filext.com/faq/office_mime_types.php (CPAN RT#82616)

 perl-MIME-Types.spec |7 ++-
 sources  |2 +-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-MIME-Types.spec b/perl-MIME-Types.spec
index d1e8a68..ad60689 100644
--- a/perl-MIME-Types.spec
+++ b/perl-MIME-Types.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-MIME-Types
-Version:1.37
+Version:1.38
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:MIME types module for Perl
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/MIME::Types.3pm*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Jan 11 2013 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.38-1
+- Update to 1.38:
+  - Add application/vnd.ms-excel.template.macroEnabled.12 and five related
+from http://filext.com/faq/office_mime_types.php (CPAN RT#82616)
+
 * Fri Dec 21 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.37-1
 - Update to 1.37:
   - Remove text/x-perl, where we also have an application/x-perl
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index f6a3131..722276b 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-d491cc7a7ba77c0d6e930ff9cfbdea61  MIME-Types-1.37.tar.gz
+994baebea02be46123cc888da5b32b8d  MIME-Types-1.38.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[perl-MIME-Types] Created tag perl-MIME-Types-1.38-1.fc19

2013-01-11 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-MIME-Types-1.38-1.fc19' was created pointing to:

 8c99be4... Update to 1.38
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 894195] duplicate directory ownership with perl-libs and perl

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894195

--- Comment #6 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
Created attachment 677016
  -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=677016action=edit
patch to make the directory owned only by perl-libs

Being allowed is not the point, this is just not necessary. 

I am trying to write a tool to detect such issues ( double owned directy,
unowned one ), because there is case where it break, when the permission are
different and no one , see #894369 . The less noise we have, the better it will
be for long term maintenance.

So as long as this doesn't bring anything, except noise when searching for
issues, I think this should be corrected.

The dependency is likely needed to have the exact EVR between perl and
perl-libs.

here is a patch that should clean the package

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gU1IBKdhcfa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 786080] perl-Shipwright-2.4.33 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786080

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2013-01-11 18:24:35

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=P864D2HC4Va=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 885594] Upgrade to new upstream version

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885594

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-0.7-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IFP3eMfJH8a=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 879957] perl-Digest-SHA-5.74 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879957

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Digest-SHA-5.74-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
 If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7lb2XKS2mra=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 879957] perl-Digest-SHA-5.74 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879957

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2013-01-11 18:52:21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GQKGRR7vGVa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 885741] perl-Test-Module-Used-0.2.4 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885741

--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Test-Module-Used-0.2.4-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KbPur2ib3Ya=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 885741] perl-Test-Module-Used-0.2.4 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885741

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2013-01-11 19:04:26

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DxC2mdhYCQa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 886801] perl-XML-Rules-1.15 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886801

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-XML-Rules-1.15-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TVnzAJVjXla=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 887477] perl-XML-Rules-1.16 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887477

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-XML-Rules-1.16-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hXFRPACmsoa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 872995] perl-PerlIO-via-dynamic-0.14 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872995

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2013-01-11 19:16:50

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NYxmaHdASZa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 872995] perl-PerlIO-via-dynamic-0.14 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872995

--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PerlIO-via-dynamic-0.14-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WL9SkHV2xHa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 887458] abi-compliance-checker-1.98.7 is available

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887458

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
api-sanity-checker-1.98-1.fc18, abi-compliance-checker-1.98.7-1.fc18 has been
pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=j9vMDBUAxFa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 885660] RFE: Upgrade to 1.280 for deps for GLib-GObject-Introspection

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885660

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2013-01-11 19:46:12

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2OVZo24SiDa=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Bug 885660] RFE: Upgrade to 1.280 for deps for GLib-GObject-Introspection

2013-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885660

--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Glib-1.280-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jqfN6NWP4La=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

  1   2   >