Heads-up: abseil-cpp 20220623.0 and grpc 1.48.0 coming to Rawhide and F37
In one week, on 2022-08-21, I plan to update abseil-cpp to 20220623.0[1] and grpc to 1.48.0[2] in Rawhide and F37. Both updates contain .so version bumps; for grpc, both the C and the C++ .so versions have changed. Because I want to merge the side tag for these packages in time for the 2022-08-23 F37 beta freeze, I plan to start doing builds in side tags a couple of days before the announced 2022-08-21 update date. I am in the process of verifying compatibility of dependent packages using local mock builds on x86_64; COPR is currently broken due to RPM signature issues related to F37 branching. In the unlikely event I find a regression I cannot trivially fix, I will delay one or both updates and will leave the PR’s unmerged. The following packages will need to be rebuilt into side tags for F38/Rawhide and F37. - bear (abseil-cpp, grpc) - bloaty (abseil-cpp) - fastnetmon (abseil-cpp, grpc) - fcitx5-mozc (abseil-cpp) - frr (abseil-cpp, grpc) - ilbc (abseil-cpp) - libarrow (grpc) - mozc (abseil-cpp) - perl-grpc-xs (grpc) Maintainers of affected packages should have received this email directly. I will rebuild bear and libarrow as a co-maintainer. Maintainers of other affected packages should expect an email when the side tags are ready. If you maintain one of the affected packages and you want me to handle these rebuilds in the future, you can add me (FAS music) to the project with “commit” privileges. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/abseil-cpp/pull-request/8 [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/grpc/pull-request/14 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Strange build issue on EPEL9 - UNKNOWN package name
On 8/14/22 03:33, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 14. 08. 22 4:57, Orion Poplawski wrote: Can anyone tell me why python-astroid gets built as "UNKNOWN" on EPEL9? Executing(%generate_buildrequires): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mum5to + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd astroid-2.12.1 + echo pyproject-rpm-macros + echo python3-devel + echo 'python3dist(pip) >= 19' + echo 'python3dist(packaging)' + '[' -f pyproject.toml ']' + echo 'python3dist(toml)' + rm -rfv UNKNOWN.dist-info/ removed 'UNKNOWN.dist-info/top_level.txt' removed 'UNKNOWN.dist-info/CONTRIBUTORS.txt' removed 'UNKNOWN.dist-info/METADATA' removed 'UNKNOWN.dist-info/LICENSE' removed directory 'UNKNOWN.dist-info/' + '[' -f /usr/bin/python3 ']' + RPM_TOXENV=py39 + HOSTNAME=rpmbuild + /usr/bin/python3 -s /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py --generate-extras --python3_pkgversion 3 Handling setuptools from build-system.requires Requirement satisfied: setuptools (installed: setuptools 53.0.0) Handling wheel from build-system.requires Requirement satisfied: wheel (installed: wheel 0.36.2) HOOK STDOUT: running egg_info HOOK STDOUT: creating UNKNOWN.egg-info HOOK STDOUT: writing UNKNOWN.egg-info/PKG-INFO HOOK STDOUT: writing dependency_links to UNKNOWN.egg-info/dependency_links.txt HOOK STDOUT: writing top-level names to UNKNOWN.egg-info/top_level.txt HOOK STDOUT: writing manifest file 'UNKNOWN.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' HOOK STDOUT: reading manifest file 'UNKNOWN.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' HOOK STDOUT: reading manifest template 'MANIFEST.in' HOOK STDOUT: adding license file 'LICENSE' HOOK STDOUT: adding license file 'CONTRIBUTORS.txt' HOOK STDOUT: writing manifest file 'UNKNOWN.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' Handling wheel from get_requires_for_build_wheel Requirement satisfied: wheel (installed: wheel 0.36.2) HOOK STDOUT: running dist_info HOOK STDOUT: writing UNKNOWN.egg-info/PKG-INFO HOOK STDOUT: writing dependency_links to UNKNOWN.egg-info/dependency_links.txt HOOK STDOUT: writing top-level names to UNKNOWN.egg-info/top_level.txt HOOK STDOUT: reading manifest file 'UNKNOWN.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' HOOK STDOUT: reading manifest template 'MANIFEST.in' HOOK STDOUT: adding license file 'LICENSE' HOOK STDOUT: adding license file 'CONTRIBUTORS.txt' HOOK STDOUT: writing manifest file 'UNKNOWN.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' HOOK STDOUT: creating '/builddir/build/BUILD/astroid-2.12.1/UNKNOWN.dist-info' HOOK STDOUT: adding license file "CONTRIBUTORS.txt" (matched pattern "CONTRIBUTORS.txt") HOOK STDOUT: adding license file "LICENSE" (matched pattern "LICENSE") Actually, when I build the PR on EPEL 9, I get: Error: Problem 1: nothing provides requested (python3dist(setuptools) >= 62.6 with python3dist(setuptools) < 63) Problem 2: nothing provides requested (python3dist(wheel) >= 0.37.1 with python3dist(wheel) < 0.38) Which is a reasonable error considering pyproject.toml has: [build-system] requires = ["setuptools~=62.6", "wheel~=0.37.1"] No idea how you got into your error. But if you manage to ignore the dependency, you might as well get UNKNOWN name, considering the project stores the name in the [project] section of pyproject.toml (PEP 621) -- something that older setuptools did not understand. If you need to pakcage recent astroid on EL 9, revert: https://github.com/PyCQA/astroid/pull/1670/ Yeah, I'm just going to stick with 2.11.X for EPEL9. Thanks. -- Orion Poplawski he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Strange build issue on EPEL9 - UNKNOWN package name
On 8/13/22 22:30, Scott Talbert wrote: On Sat, 13 Aug 2022, Orion Poplawski wrote: Can anyone tell me why python-astroid gets built as "UNKNOWN" on EPEL9? Executing(%generate_buildrequires): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mum5to + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd astroid-2.12.1 + echo pyproject-rpm-macros + echo python3-devel + echo 'python3dist(pip) >= 19' + echo 'python3dist(packaging)' + '[' -f pyproject.toml ']' + echo 'python3dist(toml)' + rm -rfv UNKNOWN.dist-info/ removed 'UNKNOWN.dist-info/top_level.txt' removed 'UNKNOWN.dist-info/CONTRIBUTORS.txt' removed 'UNKNOWN.dist-info/METADATA' removed 'UNKNOWN.dist-info/LICENSE' removed directory 'UNKNOWN.dist-info/' + '[' -f /usr/bin/python3 ']' + RPM_TOXENV=py39 + HOSTNAME=rpmbuild + /usr/bin/python3 -s /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py --generate-extras --python3_pkgversion 3 Handling setuptools from build-system.requires Requirement satisfied: setuptools (installed: setuptools 53.0.0) Handling wheel from build-system.requires Requirement satisfied: wheel (installed: wheel 0.36.2) HOOK STDOUT: running egg_info HOOK STDOUT: creating UNKNOWN.egg-info HOOK STDOUT: writing UNKNOWN.egg-info/PKG-INFO HOOK STDOUT: writing dependency_links to UNKNOWN.egg-info/dependency_links.txt HOOK STDOUT: writing top-level names to UNKNOWN.egg-info/top_level.txt HOOK STDOUT: writing manifest file 'UNKNOWN.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' HOOK STDOUT: reading manifest file 'UNKNOWN.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' HOOK STDOUT: reading manifest template 'MANIFEST.in' HOOK STDOUT: adding license file 'LICENSE' HOOK STDOUT: adding license file 'CONTRIBUTORS.txt' HOOK STDOUT: writing manifest file 'UNKNOWN.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' Handling wheel from get_requires_for_build_wheel Requirement satisfied: wheel (installed: wheel 0.36.2) HOOK STDOUT: running dist_info HOOK STDOUT: writing UNKNOWN.egg-info/PKG-INFO HOOK STDOUT: writing dependency_links to UNKNOWN.egg-info/dependency_links.txt HOOK STDOUT: writing top-level names to UNKNOWN.egg-info/top_level.txt HOOK STDOUT: reading manifest file 'UNKNOWN.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' HOOK STDOUT: reading manifest template 'MANIFEST.in' HOOK STDOUT: adding license file 'LICENSE' HOOK STDOUT: adding license file 'CONTRIBUTORS.txt' HOOK STDOUT: writing manifest file 'UNKNOWN.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' HOOK STDOUT: creating '/builddir/build/BUILD/astroid-2.12.1/UNKNOWN.dist-info' HOOK STDOUT: adding license file "CONTRIBUTORS.txt" (matched pattern "CONTRIBUTORS.txt") HOOK STDOUT: adding license file "LICENSE" (matched pattern "LICENSE") My first guess would be you need newer setuptools (>= 61.0.0, I think). Scott Yeah, I'm just going to stick with 2.11.X for EPEL9. Thanks. -- Orion Poplawski he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libbautilus-extension 3 no longer available?
On 8/14/22 19:20, Richard Shaw wrote: I have disabled the extension in Brasero for now for F37 and up. There was already an issue submitted in gitlab but no response. Thanks. I agree, disabling the extension is the right thing to do here. -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2118203] New: perl-HTML-Form-6.09 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118203 Bug ID: 2118203 Summary: perl-HTML-Form-6.09 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-HTML-Form Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, lkund...@v3.sk, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 6.09 Upstream release that is considered latest: 6.09 Current version/release in rawhide: 6.08-1.fc38 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-Form/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/14114/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Form -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118203 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: rawhide: GPG check FAILED
On 8/14/22 16:54, Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 8/14/22 04:42 PM, Christian Kujau wrote: >> Rawhide n00b here, but struggling with: >> >> --- >> $ dnf upgrade --assumeyes --releasever=rawhide zip > > Since Fedora 37 has been branched, you need to grab the new Rawhide packages. > Rawhide is now the future F38. This should work: > > dnf update fedora-gpg-keys --nogpgcheck > dnf update fedora-repos --release 38 > dnf update --refresh nogpgcheck should not be necessary, please file a bug instead of using it. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: How text files / documentation affect package licensing
On 8/11/22 10:23, Ben Beasley wrote: > I don’t enjoy this topic at all, but I feel obligated to contribute some > relevant links. > > A previous discussion on the packaging mailing list[1] concluded that it > doesn’t seem possible to package HTML documentation generated by almost any > system, including at least Sphinx, Doxygen, and mkdocs, in a way that > complies with guidelines around pre-compiled and bundled JS, CSS, and fonts. > See also [2], which started that discussion. > > There might be a conflict between this situation and certain > language-specific guidelines that prescribe packaging standardized > documentation packages. For example, [3]. > > [1] > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/LLUAURXZVADATHK65HBPPBHKF4EM4UC3/ > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006555 > [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097267 The best solution here is to patch Sphinx and Doxygen so they do not produce nonredistributable output. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) OpenPGP_0xB288B55FFF9C22C1.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Help needed: build failure trying to upgrade healpix
On 8/14/2022 6:29 AM, Jarryd Lisher via devel wrote:
Hey,
I figured out that this is mainly caused by the configure script
containing multi-line definitions. So, the hacks only operate on the
first part and land up leaving random lines of nonsense in the file.
You can fix this by adding the following "unwrap" `sed` script just
before the `%{configure}` line:
```
%{__sed} -i -z -e 's/\\\n//g' configure
```
It's not perfect, but is a simple fix to remove those errors from the
configure.
That seems like a pretty big hammer with fair potential for changing
something we didn't really want to. Can we key it's behavior somehow on
lines we care about?
Thanks,
Jeff
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Help needed: build failure trying to upgrade healpix
On 8/3/2022 2:00 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Jeff Law wrote: That would eliminate the need for those crazy macros. The problem is many packages have configury bits that are ancient and can't be rebuilt with modern autotools. I have a hard time believing that. Well, having been the one that did the work, I can tell you that trying to convert circa 2008 autoconf files to anything modern isn't always trivial. I'll also note that locally I was testing things by capturing the generated config.h files before/after all these bits went in and comparing them - across all of the Fedora packages. That's actually how we knew what insanity we had to fix in the generated configure scripts to ensure the resulting config.h files were identical. BUt if you think there's a good way to get to a place where we consistently use a reasonably modern autoconf, then by all means, be my guest to make it happen and we can zap the configure sed hacking insanity. Even the gigantic KDE 3 autotools mess last updated by upstream in 2008 can be regenerated with current autotools with only 6 patches (2 of which only fix hardcoded maximum version numbers). "gigantic KDE 3 autotools mess" -- now imagine whatever effort there was to fix that and apply it to potentially hundreds of packages. Worse yet, ponder how you're going to determine if you got it right, particularly on a package you don't know anything about :-) I'd *love* to it to be policy that things work after an autoconf -fiv (or whatever args we choose), but someone will have to step up and do the work. jeff ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: rawhide: GPG check FAILED
On 8/14/22 04:42 PM, Christian Kujau wrote: Rawhide n00b here, but struggling with: --- $ dnf upgrade --assumeyes --releasever=rawhide zip Since Fedora 37 has been branched, you need to grab the new Rawhide packages. Rawhide is now the future F38. This should work: dnf update fedora-gpg-keys --nogpgcheck dnf update fedora-repos --release 38 dnf update --refresh Steve [] [SKIPPED] zip-3.0-33.fc37.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded Fedora rawhide - x86_64 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 GPG key at file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-rawhide-x86_64 (0x5323552A) is already installed The GPG keys listed for the "Fedora rawhide - x86_64" repository are already installed but they are not correct for this package. Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository.. Failing package is: zip-3.0-33.fc37.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-rawhide-x86_64 The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: GPG check FAILED $ rpm -K /var/cache/dnf/fedora*/packages/zip*.rpm --verbose /var/cache/dnf/fedora-ebd04873699a984e/packages/zip-3.0-33.fc37.x86_64.rpm: Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID eb10b464: NOKEY Header SHA256 digest: OK Header SHA1 digest: OK Payload SHA256 digest: OK V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID eb10b464: NOKEY MD5 digest: OK --- So, RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-rawhide-x86_64 is present (via "gpg-pubkey-5323552a-6112bcdc"), but rawhide packages appear to be signed with a key called 0xeb10b464 -- I could not find that key mentioned anywhere on the interwebs, what's going on here? Also, the "zip" package is just an example, I was actually trying to "dnf system-upgrade" and that warning above was printed for every package. Yes, one could add --nogpgcheck, but that should not be needed, right? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
rawhide: GPG check FAILED
Rawhide n00b here, but struggling with: --- $ dnf upgrade --assumeyes --releasever=rawhide zip [] [SKIPPED] zip-3.0-33.fc37.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded Fedora rawhide - x86_64 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 GPG key at file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-rawhide-x86_64 (0x5323552A) is already installed The GPG keys listed for the "Fedora rawhide - x86_64" repository are already installed but they are not correct for this package. Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository.. Failing package is: zip-3.0-33.fc37.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-rawhide-x86_64 The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: GPG check FAILED $ rpm -K /var/cache/dnf/fedora*/packages/zip*.rpm --verbose /var/cache/dnf/fedora-ebd04873699a984e/packages/zip-3.0-33.fc37.x86_64.rpm: Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID eb10b464: NOKEY Header SHA256 digest: OK Header SHA1 digest: OK Payload SHA256 digest: OK V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID eb10b464: NOKEY MD5 digest: OK --- So, RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-rawhide-x86_64 is present (via "gpg-pubkey-5323552a-6112bcdc"), but rawhide packages appear to be signed with a key called 0xeb10b464 -- I could not find that key mentioned anywhere on the interwebs, what's going on here? Also, the "zip" package is just an example, I was actually trying to "dnf system-upgrade" and that warning above was printed for every package. Yes, one could add --nogpgcheck, but that should not be needed, right? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libbautilus-extension 3 no longer available?
With its move to gtk4, the nautilus extensions api has been changed: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/merge_requests/927 (plus another merge request moving the extension location to the correct place). Brasero (and others) require more than just bumping to higher API version number. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Test-Announce] Kernel 5.19 Test Week is underway
Hey All, I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 5.19 Test week is happening from 2022-08-14 to 2022-08-21. It's fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your results. As usual, the Fedora QA team will hangout at #fedora-test-...@libera.chat for question and discussion. [0] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2022-08-14_Kernel_5.19_Test_Week [1] https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/137 -- //sumantro Fedora QE TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2118006] perl-Test-Warn-0.37 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118006 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Warn-0.37-1.fc37 ||perl-Test-Warn-0.37-1.fc38 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Last Closed||2022-08-14 15:03:34 --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth --- Rawhide build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90791181 F37 build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90791577 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118006 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2118006] perl-Test-Warn-0.37 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118006 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|spo...@gmail.com|p...@city-fan.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118006 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2116392] Upgrade perl-WWW-Mechanize to 2.13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116392 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-WWW-Mechanize-2.13-1.f ||c38 Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2022-08-14 13:17:23 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Strangely, the spec file had been updated a while back but the package had never been built. Built for rawhide today: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2045589 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116392 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2115151] perl-Catalyst-View-TT-0.46 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115151 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Catalyst-View-TT-0.46- ||1.fc38 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2022-08-14 13:15:45 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2045541 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115151 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2116387] Upgrade perl-Net-Whois-Raw to 2.99037
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116387 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version||perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99.037 ||-2.fc38 Last Closed||2022-08-14 13:12:28 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2045549 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116387 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2117117] perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed-0.905 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117117 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Fixed In Version||perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed-0. ||905-1.fc38 Last Closed||2022-08-14 13:07:39 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2045554 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117117 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2118107] perl-HTML-Form-6.08 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118107 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Fixed In Version||perl-HTML-Form-6.08-1.fc38 Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2022-08-14 13:05:57 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2045585 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118107 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Help needed: build failure trying to upgrade healpix
Hey, I figured out that this is mainly caused by the configure script containing multi-line definitions. So, the hacks only operate on the first part and land up leaving random lines of nonsense in the file. You can fix this by adding the following "unwrap" `sed` script just before the `%{configure}` line:```%{__sed} -i -z -e 's/\\\n//g' configure```It's not perfect, but is a simple fix to remove those errors from the configure.-- Jarryd LisherSoftware Engineer2CF5D54114C1765FF66F8C3BCD174774D8A69173 30.07.2022, 18:35, "Kevin Kofler via devel" :Mattia Verga via devel wrote: I'm at a dead end, can someone have a look at the scratch build [1] and explain me where's the fault?What I see is that the hacks that you apply to configure are apparently notworking:checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output from gcc object/configure: line 7304: -e 's/^T .* \(.*\)$/extern int \1();/p' -e's/^[ABCDGIRSTW][ABCDGIRSTW]* .* \(.*\)$/extern char \1;/p': No such file ordirectoryIt is possible that that is what is causing the:checking for ffgnrwll in -lcfitsio... noconfigure: error: could not find the cfitsio libraryfailure in the C++ part's configure.Or maybe it is the code from this hack:+ /usr/bin/sed -r --in-place=.backup 's/^char \(\*f\) \(\) = /__attribute__((used)) char (*f) () = /g' ./configure+ /usr/bin/sed -r --in-place=.backup 's/^char \(\*f\) \(\);/__attribute__((used)) char (*f) ();/g' ./configure+ /usr/bin/sed -r --in-place=.backup 's/^char \$2 \(\);/__attribute__((used)) char \$2 ();/g' ./configurethat is not accepted by the C++ compiler?Kevin Kofler___devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.orgTo unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.orgFedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelinesList Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.orgDo not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora 37 compose report: 20220814.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-37-20220813.n.0 NEW: Fedora-37-20220814.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:50 Upgraded packages: 46 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 630.26 KiB Size of dropped packages:4.25 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 1.44 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 43.42 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Container_Base docker ppc64le Path: Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Base-37-20220813.n.0.ppc64le.tar.xz = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: rust-concolor-0.0.8-1.fc37 Summary: Control console coloring across all dependencies RPMs:rust-concolor+api_unstable-devel rust-concolor+atty-devel rust-concolor+auto-devel rust-concolor+bitflags-devel rust-concolor+clicolor-devel rust-concolor+concolor-query-devel rust-concolor+core-devel rust-concolor+default-devel rust-concolor+interactive-devel rust-concolor+no_color-devel rust-concolor+std-devel rust-concolor+term-devel rust-concolor+windows-devel rust-concolor-devel Size:112.10 KiB Package: rust-concolor-control-0.0.7-1.fc37 Summary: Control console coloring across all dependencies RPMs:rust-concolor-control+api_unstable-devel rust-concolor-control+atty-devel rust-concolor-control+auto-devel rust-concolor-control+bitflags-devel rust-concolor-control+clicolor-devel rust-concolor-control+concolor-query-devel rust-concolor-control+core-devel rust-concolor-control+default-devel rust-concolor-control+interactive-devel rust-concolor-control+no_color-devel rust-concolor-control+std-devel rust-concolor-control+term-devel rust-concolor-control+windows-devel rust-concolor-control-devel Size:114.09 KiB Package: rust-csscolorparser-0.6.2-2.fc37 Summary: CSS color parser library RPMs:rust-csscolorparser+cint-devel rust-csscolorparser+default-devel rust-csscolorparser+lab-devel rust-csscolorparser+named-colors-devel rust-csscolorparser+phf-devel rust-csscolorparser+rgb-devel rust-csscolorparser+rust-rgb-devel rust-csscolorparser+serde-devel rust-csscolorparser-devel Size:82.25 KiB Package: rust-data-encoding-macro-0.1.12-1.fc37 Summary: Macros for data-encoding RPMs:rust-data-encoding-macro+default-devel rust-data-encoding-macro-devel Size:18.77 KiB Package: rust-platform-info-0.2.0-1.fc37 Summary: Simple cross-platform interface to get info about a system RPMs:rust-platform-info+default-devel rust-platform-info-devel Size:23.84 KiB Package: rust-uucore-0.0.14-1.fc37 Summary: Uutils ~ 'core' uutils code library (cross-platform) RPMs:rust-uucore+data-encoding-devel rust-uucore+data-encoding-macro-devel rust-uucore+default-devel rust-uucore+dns-lookup-devel rust-uucore+encoding-devel rust-uucore+entries-devel rust-uucore+fs-devel rust-uucore+fsext-devel rust-uucore+itertools-devel rust-uucore+libc-devel rust-uucore+lines-devel rust-uucore+memo-devel rust-uucore+mode-devel rust-uucore+nix-devel rust-uucore+perms-devel rust-uucore+pipes-devel rust-uucore+process-devel rust-uucore+ringbuffer-devel rust-uucore+signals-devel rust-uucore+thiserror-devel rust-uucore+time-devel rust-uucore+utf8-devel rust-uucore+utmpx-devel rust-uucore+walkdir-devel rust-uucore+wide-devel rust-uucore+z85-devel rust-uucore-devel Size:279.22 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: rust-ambient-authority-0.0.1-3.fc37 Summary: Ambient Authority RPMs:rust-ambient-authority+default-devel rust-ambient-authority-devel Size:35.65 KiB Package: rust-arf-strings-0.6.5-2.fc37 Summary: Encoding and decoding for ARF strings RPMs:rust-arf-strings+default-devel rust-arf-strings-devel Size:33.87 KiB Package: rust-brotli-sys-0.3.2-8.fc37 Summary: Raw bindings to libbrotli RPMs:rust-brotli-sys+default-devel rust-brotli-sys-devel Size:367.93 KiB Package: rust-brotli2-0.3.2-8.fc37 Summary: Bindings to libbrotli to provide brotli decompression and compression to Rust RPMs:rust-brotli2+default-devel rust-brotli2-devel Size:33.02 KiB Package: rust-cap-primitives-0.24.2-2.fc37 Summary: Capability-based primitives RPMs:rust-cap-primitives+arbitrary-devel rust-cap-primitives+default-devel rust-cap-primitives-devel Size:125.81 KiB Package: rust-cap-std-0.24.2-2.fc37 Summary: Capability-based version of the Rust standard library RPMs:rust-cap-std+arf-strings-devel rust-cap-std+arf_strings-devel rust-cap-std+camino-devel rust-cap-std+default-devel rust-cap-std+fs_utf8-devel rust-cap-std-devel Size:82.87 KiB Package: rust-cap-tempfile-0.24.2-2.fc37 Summary: Capability-based temporary directories RPMs:rust-cap-tempfile+arf_strings-devel rust-cap-tempfile+camino-devel rust-cap-tempfile+default-devel rust-cap-tempfile+fs_utf8-devel rust-cap-tempfile-devel Size:47.25 KiB Package: rust-cranelift-bforest-0.82.3-2.fc37 Summary: Forest of B+-trees RPMs:rust-cranelift
Re: Updating asio in rawhide (and possibly F37) to 1.24.0
Julian Sikorski wrote on 2022/08/14 19:06:
Am 14.08.22 um 11:24 schrieb Julian Sikorski:
Dear maintainers,
I have updated Fedora asio package from the current 1.16.1 to 1.24.0. I have
rebuilt the seven current dependencies and with the exception of
OpenSceneGraph, all build fine against the updated asio package. While
OpenSceneGraph failed to build, the failure does not seem to have to do
anything with asio.
I have created a side tag so that the rebuilds can be coordinated:
f38-build-side-56604. I do not have provenpacker privileges which means you
have to request the rebuilds yourself. You can start once the asio build [1]
finishes. Thank you for your cooperation in advance.
Best regards,
Julian
[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90781633
asio-1.24.0-1.fc38 has now been built and is available in the side tag.
Well, asio{-devel} seems header (template) collection, no library, so
actually even without any rebuild, no dependency breakage will happen.
Nevertheless is it better that we rebuild all depending src.rpm?
( src.rpms with BuildRequires: asio-devel are only 7, so rebuilding them is
not hard anyway.)
1 OpenSceneGraph-0:3.6.5-10.fc37.src
2 abiword-1:3.0.5-4.fc37.src
3 freefem++-0:4.11-2.fc37.src
4 galera-0:26.4.11-3.fc37.src
5 hidviz-0:0.1.5-19.fc37.src
6 hpx-0:1.8.1-1.fc37.src
7 vdrift-0:20141020-27.git5ae309f.fc37.src
Best regards,
Julian
Regards,
Mamoru
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Updating asio in rawhide (and possibly F37) to 1.24.0
Am 14.08.22 um 11:24 schrieb Julian Sikorski: Dear maintainers, I have updated Fedora asio package from the current 1.16.1 to 1.24.0. I have rebuilt the seven current dependencies and with the exception of OpenSceneGraph, all build fine against the updated asio package. While OpenSceneGraph failed to build, the failure does not seem to have to do anything with asio. I have created a side tag so that the rebuilds can be coordinated: f38-build-side-56604. I do not have provenpacker privileges which means you have to request the rebuilds yourself. You can start once the asio build [1] finishes. Thank you for your cooperation in advance. Best regards, Julian [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90781633 asio-1.24.0-1.fc38 has now been built and is available in the side tag. Best regards, Julian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2118107] New: perl-HTML-Form-6.08 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118107 Bug ID: 2118107 Summary: perl-HTML-Form-6.08 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-HTML-Form Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, lkund...@v3.sk, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 6.08 Upstream release that is considered latest: 6.08 Current version/release in rawhide: 6.07-9.fc37 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-Form/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/14114/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Form -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118107 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Strange build issue on EPEL9 - UNKNOWN package name
On 14. 08. 22 4:57, Orion Poplawski wrote: Can anyone tell me why python-astroid gets built as "UNKNOWN" on EPEL9? Executing(%generate_buildrequires): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mum5to + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd astroid-2.12.1 + echo pyproject-rpm-macros + echo python3-devel + echo 'python3dist(pip) >= 19' + echo 'python3dist(packaging)' + '[' -f pyproject.toml ']' + echo 'python3dist(toml)' + rm -rfv UNKNOWN.dist-info/ removed 'UNKNOWN.dist-info/top_level.txt' removed 'UNKNOWN.dist-info/CONTRIBUTORS.txt' removed 'UNKNOWN.dist-info/METADATA' removed 'UNKNOWN.dist-info/LICENSE' removed directory 'UNKNOWN.dist-info/' + '[' -f /usr/bin/python3 ']' + RPM_TOXENV=py39 + HOSTNAME=rpmbuild + /usr/bin/python3 -s /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/pyproject_buildrequires.py --generate-extras --python3_pkgversion 3 Handling setuptools from build-system.requires Requirement satisfied: setuptools (installed: setuptools 53.0.0) Handling wheel from build-system.requires Requirement satisfied: wheel (installed: wheel 0.36.2) HOOK STDOUT: running egg_info HOOK STDOUT: creating UNKNOWN.egg-info HOOK STDOUT: writing UNKNOWN.egg-info/PKG-INFO HOOK STDOUT: writing dependency_links to UNKNOWN.egg-info/dependency_links.txt HOOK STDOUT: writing top-level names to UNKNOWN.egg-info/top_level.txt HOOK STDOUT: writing manifest file 'UNKNOWN.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' HOOK STDOUT: reading manifest file 'UNKNOWN.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' HOOK STDOUT: reading manifest template 'MANIFEST.in' HOOK STDOUT: adding license file 'LICENSE' HOOK STDOUT: adding license file 'CONTRIBUTORS.txt' HOOK STDOUT: writing manifest file 'UNKNOWN.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' Handling wheel from get_requires_for_build_wheel Requirement satisfied: wheel (installed: wheel 0.36.2) HOOK STDOUT: running dist_info HOOK STDOUT: writing UNKNOWN.egg-info/PKG-INFO HOOK STDOUT: writing dependency_links to UNKNOWN.egg-info/dependency_links.txt HOOK STDOUT: writing top-level names to UNKNOWN.egg-info/top_level.txt HOOK STDOUT: reading manifest file 'UNKNOWN.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' HOOK STDOUT: reading manifest template 'MANIFEST.in' HOOK STDOUT: adding license file 'LICENSE' HOOK STDOUT: adding license file 'CONTRIBUTORS.txt' HOOK STDOUT: writing manifest file 'UNKNOWN.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' HOOK STDOUT: creating '/builddir/build/BUILD/astroid-2.12.1/UNKNOWN.dist-info' HOOK STDOUT: adding license file "CONTRIBUTORS.txt" (matched pattern "CONTRIBUTORS.txt") HOOK STDOUT: adding license file "LICENSE" (matched pattern "LICENSE") Actually, when I build the PR on EPEL 9, I get: Error: Problem 1: nothing provides requested (python3dist(setuptools) >= 62.6 with python3dist(setuptools) < 63) Problem 2: nothing provides requested (python3dist(wheel) >= 0.37.1 with python3dist(wheel) < 0.38) Which is a reasonable error considering pyproject.toml has: [build-system] requires = ["setuptools~=62.6", "wheel~=0.37.1"] No idea how you got into your error. But if you manage to ignore the dependency, you might as well get UNKNOWN name, considering the project stores the name in the [project] section of pyproject.toml (PEP 621) -- something that older setuptools did not understand. If you need to pakcage recent astroid on EL 9, revert: https://github.com/PyCQA/astroid/pull/1670/ -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2115573] Please build perl-Data-Entropy for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(emmanuel@seyman.f |needinfo+ |r) | --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman --- (In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #1) > Will you be able to branch and build perl-Data-Entropy in epel9? This package requires perl-Data-Float. Once that is in EPEL9, I will build perl-Data-Entropy. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Updating asio in rawhide (and possibly F37) to 1.24.0
Dear maintainers, I have updated Fedora asio package from the current 1.16.1 to 1.24.0. I have rebuilt the seven current dependencies and with the exception of OpenSceneGraph, all build fine against the updated asio package. While OpenSceneGraph failed to build, the failure does not seem to have to do anything with asio. I have created a side tag so that the rebuilds can be coordinated: f38-build-side-56604. I do not have provenpacker privileges which means you have to request the rebuilds yourself. You can start once the asio build [1] finishes. Thank you for your cooperation in advance. Best regards, Julian [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90781633 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
