Re: Rawhide with kernel-6.2 requires VBox SVGA video mode to boot in VirtualBox
I sympathize On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 4:51 AM Ian Laurie wrote: > I've not been able to boot Rawhide in VirtualBox with any 6.2 kernel. > I am using VirtualBox to test rawhide Workstation (20230107) and the system is not displaying the welcome screen (stuck with black screen). I am able to get Fedora Workstation starting only in degraded mode, using TroubleShooting --> basic graphics mode I am not able to get a console. I don't know how to debug this stuff. > Last good kernel was kernel-6.1.0-65.fc38.x86_64. My host is Fedora 37 > all updates applied. > > Experimentation reveals that I can get my VMs to boot with a 6.2 kernel > if I use the old "VBOX SVGA" display setting rather than the "correct" > "VMSVGA" setting. > > The old setting produces a configuration alert with Linux systems > (although it does work). This feels like a kernel problem to me rather > than a VirtualBox problem at this point. > > Anyone else seeing this, I can't be the only one? > Am I also the only one ? > > Ian > -- > Ian Laurie > FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser > TZ: Australia/Sydney > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > Regards -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
mujs license change from AGPLv3+ to ISC
As a new maintainer for this package [1], considering the upstream files [2], I changed the License: field to ISC. Regards. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mujs [2] https://mujs.com/ -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 6:29 PM Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 10:26 AM Jerry James wrote:
> > The reason is in the build log:
> > Checking for mujs... not found
> > ...
> > binding: fungw_mujs disabled
>
> Your spec file has this:
>
> %package -n %{libmujs}
> Summary: Scripting support for %{name}: MuJS
> Requires: %{libname} = %{version}-%{release}
> Requires: mujs-devel
>
Aahhh. Good job ! Now I understand ! You are right !
This Requires should be a BuildRequires, correct,
(and I was right too ;) because in my environment (rpmbuild) I have this
mujs-devel package installed, and the files landed in my BUILDROOT. They
existed as I emailed previously.
My problem is : I don't know how to debug in the mock environment. (But, I
should persevere: there is always a solution, you proved it to me ;)
>
> Perhaps you meant "BuildRequires: mujs-devel" for that last line?
> --
> Jerry James
>
You are really skilled for such work. I wish I could help you with your
packages or package reviews, but I really dislike OCaml (as Java or Go, or
...)
Maybe from Sage or Python related stuff ?
Let me know (using my personal address) how I could help you there, and I
will try... Point is: I am not very active, because of so many complicated
things to grasp before solving problems !
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
Thank you again everyone. This thread can be closed.
Best regards
--
Alain V.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35
Hello Jerry
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 5:07 PM Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 8:27 AM Alain Vigne
> wrote:
> > And indeed, same error:
> > RPM build errors:
> > error: File not found:
> /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libfungw-1.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64/usr/lib/puplug/fungw_mujs.*
> > File not found:
> /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libfungw-1.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64/usr/lib64/libfungw_mujs.*
> > ...
> > It has something to do with me removing the files post install
> > rm -f %{buildroot}/%{_usr}/lib/puplug/%{srcname}*.a
> > rm -f %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/%{name}*.a
>
> Your %files list says to include /usr/lib/puplug/fungw_mujs.* and
> /usr/lib64/libfungw_mujs.* in packages, but there are no files
> matching those globs in the buildroot after the %install script
> finishes.
What may lead you to this conclusion ?
My observation is:
The %make_install step install all files, shared and static libraries
in /BUILDROOT/libfungw-1.2.0-1.fc35.x86_64/usr/lib64 dir
libfungw_mujs.a
libfungw_mujs.so.1
libfungw_mujs.so.1.2
libfungw_mujs.so.1.2.0
And post install, I do want to remove those static libs.
libfungw_mujs.a
in fact, the libfungw*.a
This is happening correctly when I "rpmbuild file.spec", but is not OK with
mock.
You removed the static libraries from those locations, but
> there are no shared libraries there.
>
There are
(see above)
I still don't understand
> --
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
--
Alain V.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 4:51 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 02/02/2022 16:35, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > And if not specified, mock tries to > > pick the mock configuration according the host system (so it uses > > '-r fedora-35-x86_64' on a fedora-35-x86_64 host system). > > No. It uses /etc/mock/default.cfg. > > -- > Sincerely, >Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > Thank you all... As expected, I tried a COPR, and failed : for example https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/avigne/libfungw/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/03291373-libfungw/ Sorry to disturb you. -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35
Hello Ankur
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 4:18 PM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 16:07:38 +0100, Alain Vigne wrote:
> > Can someone explain to me why my .srpm [1]
> > is not building in mock ?
> >
> > I ran
> > > mock filename.srpm
>
> Have you had a chance to look at the mock man page, or this wiki page?
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Mock_to_test_package_builds#How_do_I_use_Mock.3F
Yes... The page says *This page needs some love *<3
>
>
> The command is of the form:
>
> mock -r --rebuild ./path/to/srpm
>
It says also
--rebuild is the default option. So the following would work equally well
mock package-1.2-3.src.rpm
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Regards,
> Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
> Time zone: Europe/London
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
And indeed, same error:
RPM build errors:
error: File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libfungw-1.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64/usr/lib/puplug/fungw_mujs.*
File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libfungw-1.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64/usr/lib64/libfungw_mujs.*
...
It has something to do with me removing the files post install
rm -f %{buildroot}/%{_usr}/lib/puplug/%{srcname}*.a
rm -f %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/%{name}*.a
--
Alain V.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
mock, %{buildroot}, fc35
Can someone explain to me why my .srpm [1] is not building in mock ? I ran > mock filename.srpm Will it work in COPR, Koji ? [1] https://avigne.fedorapeople.org/libfungw-1.2.0-1.fc35.src.rpm TIA -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Do I have a @fedoraproject.org e-mail address ?
Thank you all To conclude - I have a working @fedoraproject.org email alias - "external" people can reach me via this alias - I can't receive emails I sent to this alias from my gmail address (which is my email address registered in Fedora Accounts) - I need to dig into https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/using-fedora-email-alias-gmail/ Best regards Alain On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 3:44 PM Luna Jernberg wrote: > Seems my test email worked > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 3:18 PM Alain Vigne > wrote: > >> Thank you, I did read this wiki page a long time ago, but was not able to >> retrieve it :( >> >> I remembered that it should work this way, so I sent a test email to my >> fedora... address, and I was expecting to get it in my gmail mailbox... >> But it doesn't seem to work for me ? >> Maybe an infinite loop ? >> >>- gmail sends to fedoraproject which forwards to gmail ? >> >> My test e-mail doesn't land in my gmail spam either... >> >> Could someone send me something at avigne AT fedoraproject org please >> ? >> Is there something wrong with me ? >> TIA >> Alain >> >> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 2:52 PM Ankur Sinha >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 14:29:07 +0100, Alain Vigne wrote: >>> > Hi >>> > I am a Fedora packager [1] and I thought writing to >>> > my_...@fedoraproject.org >>> > would redirect to my registered e-mail address... It seems not !? >>> > If yes, how to enter needed information to Thunderbird client, for ex. >>> ? >>> > >>> > I couldn't find documentation about this question. Thank you for your >>> > explanations. >>> >>> It is an e-mail alias, there's no mailbox attached to it. It simply >>> redirects to whatever e-mail you've specified in FAS. >>> >>> More information here: >>> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EmailAliases >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks, >>> Regards, >>> Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha >>> Time zone: Europe/London >>> ___ >>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Fedora Code of Conduct: >>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >>> List Archives: >>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: >>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >>> >> >> >> -- >> Alain V. >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >> > -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Do I have a @fedoraproject.org e-mail address ?
Why this has to be SO complicated ? On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 3:35 PM Eduard Lucena wrote: > El vie., 21 de enero de 2022 11:18, Alain Vigne > escribió: > >> Thank you, I did read this wiki page a long time ago, but was not able to >> retrieve it :( >> >> I remembered that it should work this way, so I sent a test email to my >> fedora... address, and I was expecting to get it in my gmail mailbox... >> But it doesn't seem to work for me ? >> Maybe an infinite loop ? >> >>- gmail sends to fedoraproject which forwards to gmail ? >> >> My test e-mail doesn't land in my gmail spam either... >> >> Could someone send me something at avigne AT fedoraproject org please >> ? >> Is there something wrong with me ? >> TIA >> Alain >> >> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 2:52 PM Ankur Sinha >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 14:29:07 +0100, Alain Vigne wrote: >>> > Hi >>> > I am a Fedora packager [1] and I thought writing to >>> > my_...@fedoraproject.org >>> > would redirect to my registered e-mail address... It seems not !? >>> > If yes, how to enter needed information to Thunderbird client, for ex. >>> ? >>> > >>> > I couldn't find documentation about this question. Thank you for your >>> > explanations. >>> >>> It is an e-mail alias, there's no mailbox attached to it. It simply >>> redirects to whatever e-mail you've specified in FAS. >>> >>> More information here: >>> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EmailAliases >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks, >>> Regards, >>> Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha >>> Time zone: Europe/London >>> ___ >>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Fedora Code of Conduct: >>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >>> List Archives: >>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: >>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >>> >> >> >> -- >> Alain V. >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >> > >> >> > > It's a little harder to make it work with Gmail, but not impossible. Take > a look at > https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/using-fedora-email-alias-gmail/ > > > There is comment I did about how to complete a step. It's related to 2FA. > > > Hope it helps. > > Br, > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Do I have a @fedoraproject.org e-mail address ?
Thank you, I did read this wiki page a long time ago, but was not able to retrieve it :( I remembered that it should work this way, so I sent a test email to my fedora... address, and I was expecting to get it in my gmail mailbox... But it doesn't seem to work for me ? Maybe an infinite loop ? - gmail sends to fedoraproject which forwards to gmail ? My test e-mail doesn't land in my gmail spam either... Could someone send me something at avigne AT fedoraproject org please ? Is there something wrong with me ? TIA Alain On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 2:52 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 14:29:07 +0100, Alain Vigne wrote: > > Hi > > I am a Fedora packager [1] and I thought writing to > > my_...@fedoraproject.org > > would redirect to my registered e-mail address... It seems not !? > > If yes, how to enter needed information to Thunderbird client, for ex. ? > > > > I couldn't find documentation about this question. Thank you for your > > explanations. > > It is an e-mail alias, there's no mailbox attached to it. It simply > redirects to whatever e-mail you've specified in FAS. > > More information here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EmailAliases > > -- > Thanks, > Regards, > Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha > Time zone: Europe/London > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Do I have a @fedoraproject.org e-mail address ?
Hi I am a Fedora packager [1] and I thought writing to my_...@fedoraproject.org would redirect to my registered e-mail address... It seems not !? If yes, how to enter needed information to Thunderbird client, for ex. ? I couldn't find documentation about this question. Thank you for your explanations. Kind regards -- Alain V. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/avigne ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Self Introduction: Gonçalo Pereira
Hi, I am Alain, co-maintainer of Qucs, because I proposed to help Geoffrey with Fedora Electonic Lab related software. I saw Qucs was FTBFS, and planed to update to "latest" 0.0.19, or 0.0.20-rc2 ? But I did not dedicate enough time. Sigh. I am not an experienced packager, nor developer. Just an Electrical Engineer... I am not sure a revival of freehdl is a good idea, as the project seems dead upstream. How familiar with those software are you ? Did you subscribe to the Qucs dev list ? Did you contact upstream already ? I wonder if an "Electronic Lab" mailing list exists ? and if such discussions could better happen there, and not disturbing all Fedora devs... Else, I propose to start a private thread of some sort. Kind regards Alain On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 5:55 PM wrote: > Thank you for the update on the status of the qucs package. > I will try to create a package and if that goes well I will get back to > you. > Best Regards, > Gonçalo Pereira > > On 8 Mar 2020 16:42, Ian McInerney wrote: > > Unfortunately, Qucs appears to be in a problematic state right now. There > are two main issues with it: > > 1) It has a requires on freehdl, but freehdl was orphaned a year ago so it > is not in F30/31/32. > 2) It fails to build in F32, the Bugzilla entry seems to suggest that this > is fixed if Qucs gets upgraded to its most recent version ( > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799962) though, since it was > fallout from the GCC 10 upgrade. > > The issue with freehdl is that it needs to go through a new review to get > re-added to the repository (since it has been over a year since it was > orphaned). > > The primary Qucs maintainer is Geoffrey Marr (I have CC'd him in on this), > so hopefully he can respond and say if he has time to keep working on Qucs. > > Probably the best place to start would be to revive the freehdl package > (so you will need to rewrite the spec file and get it reviewed). If you > want a co-maintaner, I can help out since I have used Qucs for a while (but > haven't had to recently, so I didn't notice the breakage) - but I can't > sponsor into the packager group, so you would need to find someone willing > to sponsor you. > > -Ian > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 4:09 PM Gonçalo Camelo Neves Pereira < > goncalo_pere...@outlook.pt> wrote: > > Hello! > > I am Gonçalo (gpereira). I am an electrical engineer so you can expect > my contributions to be around those kinds of packages. My motivation to > join was seeing the qucs package broken. I would like to dedicate some > time to understand the spec file in order to maintain it. I believe this > will be a good starting point to learn more about the fedora package > system. > > By the way, is there anyone that tried this already? > > Best Regards, > Gonçalo Pereira > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for Pantheon / elementary apps (Vala / GObject / GTK+)
Hello Fabio I am not very active, and not a software engineer, but Vala/GTK applications are kind of my hobby, and I had the opportunity to take a look at elementary applications (code wise too). You are maintaining much more packages I can ever pretend to maintain, so this will be a little help. But I am ready to lend a hand, if I can get some guidance, milestones, and if we can work together... ? I am CET time zone based. Do you work from the USA ? My FAS is: avigne. Keep me posted. BR, Alain On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 9:30 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi everybody, > > With more responsibilities (FPC, Stewardship SIG, FESCo) and the > ever-growing number of packages I maintain, I don't have as much time > for the things I originally started my contributions to fedora with - > the Pantheon desktop and the accompanying elementary applications. > > What makes things worse is that I am not particularly proficient with > Vala or C/GObject, other than including upstream patches or doing > simple backports. That means some issues are punted until upstream > projects get around to fixing them (and if these issues are only > affecting "third-party" distros like fedora, that can take a while). > > Also, the fact that GNOME frequently (almost with every new major > stable release, which means with almost every fedora release) breaks > something - either subtly or not - does not help. > gnome-settings-daemon changes its DBus interfaces almost every > release. mutter makes sweeping API changes almost every release. Both > gala and the elementary LightDM greeter can't keep up with upstream > mutter, and are basically still stuck on mutter 3.28 support (which is > why there is a mutter328 compat package) ... > > Overall, this results in the quality of all these packages not being > as high as I would like it to be (though it's still pretty good, all > things considered). In particular, there are some components that are > more "crashy" than the rest, and I don't have the time and skill to > get deep into debugging the issue in most cases: > > - wingpanel (the panel for Pantheon); issues in individual indicators > also crash the whole app because they are just dlopen()ed > - switchboard (the settings application); issues in individual > settings panels also crash the whole app because they are just > dlopen()ed > - gala (the window manager): obviously bad if the WM crashes, though > not as bad because it's still an Xorg session > - plank (the dock); also optionally used on XFCE (I think) > - sequeler (third-party SQL client developed for Pantheon) > > I would greatly appreciate if somebody who knows their GObject-fu > could help me out here. > > The elementaryOS upstream developers are usually helpful and accept > patches - even for things that are not a problem on elementaryOS, so > long as they can be switched on/off with e.g. conditional compilation. > But reported issues - that only affect fedora - without attached > patches / PRs are obviously low priority for them, and often sit > untouched for months or years. > > In general, I manage to keep the packages for Pantheon / elementary > projects up-to-date. Having set up "nightly" builds on COPR a few > years ago really helps to catch potential issues early. > > If anybody is interested, here are some pointers: > > - all packages are tracked in koschei, in the decathorpe/elementary group: > https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/groups/decathorpe/elementary > > - nightly builds are done on COPR: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/decathorpe/elementary-nightly/ > > Thanks, > Fabio > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Please welcome @alciregi to the packager group
Welcome ! And thank you very much, Ankur, for coordinating these actions :) BR, Alain On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 1:23 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello, > > I've just sponsored @alciregi to the packagers group. > > They've been around the Fedora community for a while already and have > helped with QA/Marketing/Join/AskFedora and lots of other things. Now, > they are also looking to help the NeuroSIG with packaging and learn the > process along the way. I've added them to the neuro-sig where they will > help co-maintain our package list, and pick up the required > skills/knowledge. > > Please welcome them to the packager and neuro-sig groups. > > @alciregi: you already know all this, but for completeness: please > e-mail the various lists when you need to :) > > -- > Thanks, > Regards, > Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha > Time zone: Europe/London > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unresponsive Maintainer: Chitlesh Goorah
Hi Geoffrey I am Alain, FAS: avigne, a micro-electronic engineer, mainly interested in CAD/EDA tools. I started my journey to become a Fedora packager with this spin in mind (+ introducing another PCB tool: pcb-rnd) I have been in contact with Chitlesh, and also with Kiara, who both stepped down the FEL effort. I volunteered to make things moving, but it was already an overwhelming task to package one new package, and at the time, had no idea how to handle a spin. Now, I am a bit more familiar with Fedora stuff, so I might be helpful there... ? I already proposed to co-maintain some packages, without success (I know now, I should file multiple tickets to claim the packages. Just didn't take the time for this bureaucracy). Some packages need updates, but some need a retirement, to be replaced with some other projects. What is your main concern with this spin? Can we team up to make this moving again? Who else has an interest in FEL? Best regards Alain On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 6:32 PM Geoffrey Marr wrote: > Hi devel-list, > > I am trying to contact Chitlesh Goorah [0], as he is the maintainer of the > Fedora Electronics Lab Spin [1]. The spin desperately needs some love and > maintenance. Does anyone know how to contact him? I have reached out to him > three times in total, once in 2016, and again twice in 2019 and haven't > heard back. I have started the unresponsive maintainer process, here is a > link to the Bugzilla bug [2]. After a week of this mail being on the list, > I will open a FESCo ticket. > > Thanks, > Geoff Marr > IRC: coremodule > > [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Chitlesh > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Electronic_Lab?rd=ElectronicLab_Spin > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739872 > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaning packages
Hello Kiara I volunteer to become package maintainer for - linsmith my FAS is: avigne About piklab, upstream seems dead. I suggest to retire it. Concerning ahkab (and python-deltasigma from same author) unfortunately, project seem to stale and can not compete with ngspice ? If you think python-deltasigma has some future and merit to stay in Fedora, I might maintain it. Otherwise, let it be retired. Best regards Alain V. On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:56 PM Kiara Navarro wrote: > Hi, > > I just orphaned the following packages: > > >- linsmith >- python-deltasigma >- piklab >- ahkab > > > Feel free to take it if you want to. > > Best regards, > > -- > *K.N* > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Update a package with new upstream release
Thanks a lot Alex So, "old wiki" is still relevant... I was searching in https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:47 PM Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Alain, > > I believe these two documents should come in handy: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintenance_guide > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO > (the second one is mostly about the update process) > > Source packages are not part of the "usual" git transactions, they are > modified with "fedpkg sources" and "fedpkg new-sources" commands and > uploaded to the lookaside cache. The "sources" file in your git folder > points to the current source package for the branch you are working > on. If you've messed up the source packages, a "fedpkg new-sources > " should set things straight. > > Best regards, > Alex > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Update a package with new upstream release
Upstream releases a new version. I changed the .spec file, generate a srpm file, then perform again $ fedpgk import This creates a tar.gz file in my git dir, and I did commit this file. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pcb-rnd/blob/master/f/pcb-rnd-2.1.0.tar.gz I think this is wrong, so: 1. Can I git delete / push this tar.gz file ? Other action ? 2. It is not a fedpkg import command to use ? fedpkg new-sources ? How ? 3. Is there a documentation related to these maintenance actions ? Thanks for your help. -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to get a list of C-only packages to review ?
Agree, once the .spec file is opened, it is obvious. But the list such as : https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html doesn't give you easy access to the info: you have to open the BZ, then look for the file (if you are lucky). Worst case is when .spec file needs to be extracted (takes even more time !) Also, how in BZ, do you state there is no need for reviewer, because review already started ? For example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636668 ? I think I am looking for a kind of "TODO" task list I can contribute on. BR,Alain On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 5:03 PM Rex Dieter wrote: > Alain Vigne wrote: > > > As a new packager, I understand peer-reviewing packages is very > important, > > but it takes me (a lot of) time, and I do not have the necessary skills > to > > review any kind of packages (Go, Python, Rust, Java, Javascript, Ruby, > ... > > you name it) > > > > That is why I can offer to review packages of C libs, apps, or GNOME > apps, > > Vala programs, or ..?, if I can be aware of such review to do. > > > > How do I get such a list ? > > Package reviews are not tracked by language, in general, so as far as I > know, there is no such list currently. > > That said, it's generally not a large task to determine if something is a > C > lib, gnome app, or something that depends on vala, by examining the > package's .spec file for build depdnencies. > > -- Rex > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
How to get a list of C-only packages to review ?
As a new packager, I understand peer-reviewing packages is very important, but it takes me (a lot of) time, and I do not have the necessary skills to review any kind of packages (Go, Python, Rust, Java, Javascript, Ruby, ... you name it) That is why I can offer to review packages of C libs, apps, or GNOME apps, Vala programs, or ..?, if I can be aware of such review to do. How do I get such a list ? Best regards -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Wayland hangs (black screen) after dnf update to Fedora 29
Thank you very much for your replies. No 'rhgb' is the workaround in my case. I added my comment to the bug report you mentioned Fabio. Any idea who is handling this, current status and how/when/why this will be solved ? BR, Alain On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 1:05 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 11:41 PM Alain Vigne > wrote: > > > > Hi everyone > > TLDR; I had a working Wayland Gnome Desktop in f28. Not anymore with f29. > > > > Yesterday, I "dnf upgrade" my f28 to f29 ... to find a black screen when > I want to login to my Gnome session :( > > > > The boot is OK till the gdm login screen, but when I enter my password, > the screen turns black, and the keyboard is locked (non-responsive, Num > Lock does not toggle, nor caps lock). > > Then I don't know how to recover control, as no key binding is > effective, no mouse, no screen :(I power off the machine) > > > > I successfully launched the desktop using "startx" from my user account > after booting with runlevel=3, so I think there is an issue with Wayland ! > > > > > lspci|grep "VGA" > > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GM206 [GeForce GTX > 960] (rev a1) > > I used to install the nvidia drivers, after each kernel upgrade. I did > that, as usual using: > > > ./NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-410.73.run > > > > Where should I look to have more information about what's wrong with my > system ? > > Which component should I report on BZ ? > > What additional info would be helpful for knowledgeable developers ? > > > > Thanks for your help > > Best regards > > -- > > Alain V. > > Hi Alain, > > This seems to be a common issue with fedora 29 / NVIDIA drivers, I > reported it here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643302 > > And there are some people on reddit who seem to be affected, too. > > Have you tried dropping "rhgb" from the kernel command line (by > editing the GRUB boot entry)? (Possibly also change > nvidia-drm.modeset=1 to nvidia-drm.modeset=0 to disable wayland in > gdm.) > Most people seem to confirm that this serves as a workaround. > > Fabio > > > ___ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Wayland hangs (black screen) after dnf update to Fedora 29
Hi everyone TLDR; I had a working Wayland Gnome Desktop in f28. Not anymore with f29. Yesterday, I "dnf upgrade" my f28 to f29 ... to find a black screen when I want to login to my Gnome session :( The boot is OK till the gdm login screen, but when I enter my password, the screen turns black, and the keyboard is locked (non-responsive, Num Lock does not toggle, nor caps lock). Then I don't know how to recover control, as no key binding is effective, no mouse, no screen :(I power off the machine) I successfully launched the desktop using "startx" from my user account after booting with runlevel=3, so I think there is an issue with Wayland ! > lspci|grep "VGA" 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GM206 [GeForce GTX 960] (rev a1) I used to install the nvidia drivers, after each kernel upgrade. I did that, as usual using: > ./NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-410.73.run Where should I look to have more information about what's wrong with my system ? Which component should I report on BZ ? What additional info would be helpful for knowledgeable developers ? Thanks for your help Best regards -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaning several packages.
I can not say I volunteer for ALL of Kiara's packages, but I can start with some: 1. gerbv 2. netgen 3. toped 4. gds2pov This is part of FEL (Fedora Electronic Spin) "revival". Who else is interested? My FAS is : avigne BR, Alain On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 4:11 PM Kiara Navarro wrote: > Hi all, > > I am orphaning a list of packages that I am not able to longer maintain. > Most of them are related to electronic applications. > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qt-qsa > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/piklab > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pikdev > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ovm > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pikloops > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wb_builder > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs-verilog-mode > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/archimedes > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/electric > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kpolynome > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kmenu-gnome > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/keurocalc > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fped > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/netgen > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gds2pov > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/geda-gaf > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gerbv > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/toped > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sk2py > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/piklab > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pharosc > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mot-adms > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/freehdl > > Best regards! > > -- > *K.N* > > *GPG-KEY*: A81DB1D8 > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: orphaning LabPlot
Hello Mukundan You don't have time anymore for Labplot ? Other problems with the package ? I would be keen on taking this over, but I am still waiting for a sponsor, as I am not part (yet ?) of the packager group... May be I co-maintain it ? My FAS username is avigne , my COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/avigne/ Please, advise. Best regards Alain On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 2:24 AM Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > I intent to orphan LabPlot soon. If anyone is interested, I can transfer > this package to that person. > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/LabPlot > > > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self introduction: Alain Vigne
Hello ? No one interested ? How do I move forward ? On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 9:05 AM Alain Vigne wrote: > Hi everyone, > I am Alain, a French EE engineer using Fedora 28 and EDA open source > tools, for a long time now. > > I am part of the pcb-rnd developer upstream > http://repo.hu/projects/pcb-rnd/ > and was able to produce a .spec file + SRPM rpm file + COPR successful > builds: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/avigne/pcb-rnd/ > > Now, I am looking for a sponsor to officially get this package into > Fedora. I filled this BZ bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240 > > I volunteer to be the package maintainer, I have read the guidelines and > acknowledge responsibilities requested for such a task. > My FAS username is: avigne > > This package could also be part of FEL (Fedora Electronic Lab) spin, to be > revived ? I am open to discussions about packaging latest versions of > EE/CAD open source tools. > > Hoping for some positive feed-back... > Best regards > -- > Alain V. > -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedora-package purpose and future
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:15 PM Ben Rosser wrote: > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > >> This is a bit unfortunate considering this is package > >> every Fedora packager has to have installed > > > > I don't think that's true, can you explain? > > > > -- rex > > Well, the "join the package collection maintainers" document > explicitly tells new packagers to install fedora-packager, because it > will "bring in everything necessary for general packaging work". > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Install_the_developer_client_tools > > So I would guess that many packagers have followed this advice and > have it installed on their systems. I certainly do. > +1 > > Ben Rosser > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Self introduction: Alain Vigne
Hi everyone, I am Alain, a French EE engineer using Fedora 28 and EDA open source tools, for a long time now. I am part of the pcb-rnd developer upstream http://repo.hu/projects/pcb-rnd/ and was able to produce a .spec file + SRPM rpm file + COPR successful builds: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/avigne/pcb-rnd/ Now, I am looking for a sponsor to officially get this package into Fedora. I filled this BZ bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240 I volunteer to be the package maintainer, I have read the guidelines and acknowledge responsibilities requested for such a task. My FAS username is: avigne This package could also be part of FEL (Fedora Electronic Lab) spin, to be revived ? I am open to discussions about packaging latest versions of EE/CAD open source tools. Hoping for some positive feed-back... Best regards -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Review swaps
I fifth that... Because he was the only guy from Fedora project, who gave me feed-back about my proposal for a new package : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240 https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/avigne/pcb-rnd/ Thank you Robert-André. -- Alain V. On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 1:12 PM Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018, 13:07 Alois Mahdal wrote: > >> >> >> On 07/09/2018 12:36 AM, Jerry James wrote: >> > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 9:49 AM Robert-André Mauchin >> wrote: >> >> I took care of: >> >> >> >> - cadical: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599012 >> >> - lfsc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599013 >> >> - symfpu: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599014 >> > >> > I would like to give a shout out to Robert-André for his efforts >> > reviewing packages. He has been working hard at keeping the size of >> > the review queue under control for quite some time now. Almost every >> > review I go peek at to see if there is something I can do, >> > Robert-André got there first. He is giving great reviews, and I think >> > he deserves a little public recognition. >> > >> >> I third that! :) >> >> Rober-André helped me with both of my new packages. As newbie, his >> feedback being almost instant and always clear and concise helped both >> learning and feeling how the Fedora community is alive and welcoming. >> > > I fourth that! > > He is the only one who reviews my Rust packages lately. Neal Gompa does > that too, but lately he is pretty busy. > -- > > -Igor Gnatenko > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/A3E7BJHZF537YSEHH4Z3IHJY3TALV63U/ > -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/U2P3U4FMJ7Z7VFFJ26NZNZJLCOVR4SQP/
Test
Is someone receiving me ? TIA -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/F67AVUE2N5BLAIJ4JSOMBUFSOB5D6SKU/
Re: REMINDER: Submission deadline for Changes of Fedora 29 requiring mass rebuild takes effect in one week
Thanks... I was wondering how introduction of a new package enters such schedule [1] ? More specifically, when is the deadline for a new package to enter Fedora 29 ? I recall my introduction from 5 days ago, stating I volunteer to maintain a new EDA package (and co-maintain others ?) : " Hi, I am Alain, a French EE engineer using Fedora 28 and EDA open source tools, as an hobby. I am part of the pcb-rnd developer upstream http://repo.hu/projects/pcb-rnd/ and was able to produce a .spec file + SRPM rpm file, and COPR successful build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/avigne/pcb-rnd/ Now, I am looking for a sponsor to get this package into Fedora. I filled this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240 I volunteer to be the package maintainer, have read the guidelines and acknowledge responsibilities requested for such a task. My FAS username is: avigne This package could also be part of FEL (Fedora Electronic Lab) spin, to be revived ? Hoping for some positive feed-back... Best regards " On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > Hi everyone! > > The submission deadline for Changes of Fedora 29 [1], requiring mass > rebuild, takes effect in one week on June 19th. All the Changes > requiring mass rebuild sent for review after this deadline are going > to be moved to Fedora 30 release. > The mass rebuild it self is planned on July 11th. > > The deadline for System Wide Changes which do not need the mass > rebuild is planned on July 3rd. > > If your Change proposal needs mass rebuild, please submit it by the > deadline, earlier better. In case you'll need any help with your > Change proposals, feel free to contact me. > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/29/Schedule > > Best Regards, > Jan > -- > Jan Kuřík > JBoss EAP Program Manager > Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists. > fedoraproject.org/message/B25U3IVRNCXUTPLGPZCJQJ2MKXRDOF42/ > -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/J2AOLQ66XOTPXJYCKGQSWWAK7D3P3FZ4/
Seek a sponsor for new package : pcb-rnd (PCB layout editor)
Hi, I am Alain, a French EE engineer using Fedora 28 and EDA open source tools, as an hobby. I am part of the pcb-rnd developer upstream http://repo.hu/projects/pcb-rnd/ and was able to produce a .spec file + SRPM rpm file, and COPR successful build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/avigne/pcb-rnd/ Now, I am looking for a sponsor to get this package into Fedora. I filled this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240 I volunteer to be the package maintainer, have read the guidelines and acknowledge responsibilities requested for such a task. My FAS username is: avigne This package could also be part of FEL (Fedora Electronic Lab) spin, to be revived ? Hoping for some positive feed-back... Best regards -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IYS7CQZDC4SNALZYKCXNGEAUTJT44HN3/
