Re: [OT Security PSA] Shellshock: Update your bash, now!
On Sunday, 5 October 2014 at 21:53:08 UTC, eles wrote: On Sunday, 5 October 2014 at 21:13:01 UTC, Kagamin wrote: On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 11:25:59 UTC, eles wrote: it) and a new-comer on the scene is Tranglu, that I just *Tanglu http://www.tanglu.org/en/
Re: DUB 0.9.22 released
Thanks for your works, One question, what about makefile support ? Regards
Re: SDC-32bit
Updated fork again. -m32 and -m64 switches work properly now. sdc32 uses a the same default outputFile as dmd does. Soon to come : - ArrayLiterals In planning : - a new backend ;D - Source-to-Source transformations
Re: [OT Security PSA] Shellshock: Update your bash, now!
On 10/2/14 3:42 AM, Kagamin wrote: On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 07:14:35 UTC, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: Doesn't Linux Mint provide an upgrade facility for you? No idea. I use Linux Mint, I believe I upgraded once *. I don't think it was complex, just an upgrade through the standard UI for updates. * Note: I have a bad memory when it comes to things like this :) -Steve
Re: [OT Security PSA] Shellshock: Update your bash, now!
On Monday, 6 October 2014 at 15:06:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 10/2/14 3:42 AM, Kagamin wrote: On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 07:14:35 UTC, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: Doesn't Linux Mint provide an upgrade facility for you? No idea. I use Linux Mint, I believe I upgraded once *. I don't think it was complex, just an upgrade through the standard UI for updates. * Note: I have a bad memory when it comes to things like this :) -Steve Mint always supported upgrades between LTS releases. There were no upgrades between non-LTS releases, which were basically just bit-more-stable betas. That's changed now as posted above, Mint 14.04 to 15.10 (and possibly longer) will be seamlessly upgradable release to release as Mint gradually diverges away from its Ubuntu base. 16.04 may be a reset, or they may continue to diverge further, or they may move fully to Debian; but they'll probably still have an upgrade path as it will be an LTS.
D2 port of Sociomantic CDGC available for early experiments
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/985 Here is initial port result available for early experiments. It can be compiled with make -f posix.mak GC_TYPE=concurrent and passes the test suite with only shared library tests disabled (ef20b7a). There are still many issues to be aware of: 1) Documentation is largely missing. Working on it, reading @leandro-lucarella-sociomantic old posts (http://www.llucax.com.ar/blog/blog/tag/understanding%20the%20current%20gc) may help in the meanwhile 2) Code style differs from Phobos standards. To be fixed soon. 3) Shared library support is completely missing. Proxy infrastructure similar to one in existing gc needs to be added and I don't know if actual implementation will work in such environments or more changes will be needed. 4) Deadlock issue (http://www.dsource.org/projects/tango/ticket/2087) still remains. It is not critical to our code because it almost never uses threads so no big effort was put into it but this can be huge problem for any other project. In general this is very far from something that can be merged upstream straight away and replace default GC on linux. It can be interesting for other projects with similar architecture and requirements and probably helpful for anyone else working on better D GC. And contributions are welcome via pull requests towards this PR base branch (https://github.com/mihails-strasuns-sociomantic/druntime-1/tree/sociomantic-cdgc-wip) or as e-mail patches (pub...@dicebot.lv)
Re: D2 port of Sociomantic CDGC available for early experiments
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:51:06 + Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/985 Here is initial port result available for early experiments. It can be compiled with make -f posix.mak GC_TYPE=concurrent and passes the test suite with only shared library tests disabled (ef20b7a). wow, going to try it NOW! ;-) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [OT Security PSA] Shellshock: Update your bash, now!
On 10/6/14 12:10 PM, Kiith-Sa wrote: On Monday, 6 October 2014 at 15:06:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 10/2/14 3:42 AM, Kagamin wrote: On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 07:14:35 UTC, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: Doesn't Linux Mint provide an upgrade facility for you? No idea. I use Linux Mint, I believe I upgraded once *. I don't think it was complex, just an upgrade through the standard UI for updates. * Note: I have a bad memory when it comes to things like this :) Mint always supported upgrades between LTS releases. There were no upgrades between non-LTS releases, which were basically just bit-more-stable betas. That's changed now as posted above, Mint 14.04 to 15.10 (and possibly longer) will be seamlessly upgradable release to release as Mint gradually diverges away from its Ubuntu base. 16.04 may be a reset, or they may continue to diverge further, or they may move fully to Debian; but they'll probably still have an upgrade path as it will be an LTS. Hm.. I think I had Linux Mint 12, and I upgraded to 13 (not the LTS version). Maybe it wasn't so seamless, as I said I have a bad memory. -Steve
Re: D2 port of Sociomantic CDGC available for early experiments
On Monday, 6 October 2014 at 16:51:07 UTC, Dicebot wrote: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/985 Here is initial port result available for early experiments. It can be compiled with make -f posix.mak GC_TYPE=concurrent and passes the test suite with only shared library tests disabled (ef20b7a). There are still many issues to be aware of: 1) Documentation is largely missing. Working on it, reading @leandro-lucarella-sociomantic old posts (http://www.llucax.com.ar/blog/blog/tag/understanding%20the%20current%20gc) may help in the meanwhile 2) Code style differs from Phobos standards. To be fixed soon. 3) Shared library support is completely missing. Proxy infrastructure similar to one in existing gc needs to be added and I don't know if actual implementation will work in such environments or more changes will be needed. 4) Deadlock issue (http://www.dsource.org/projects/tango/ticket/2087) still remains. It is not critical to our code because it almost never uses threads so no big effort was put into it but this can be huge problem for any other project. In general this is very far from something that can be merged upstream straight away and replace default GC on linux. It can be interesting for other projects with similar architecture and requirements and probably helpful for anyone else working on better D GC. And contributions are welcome via pull requests towards this PR base branch (https://github.com/mihails-strasuns-sociomantic/druntime-1/tree/sociomantic-cdgc-wip) or as e-mail patches (pub...@dicebot.lv) Can't really test this right now, just want to say that it's awesome that someone is working on this and I really hope this can (eventually) get merged.
Re: D2 port of Sociomantic CDGC available for early experiments
On 10/6/14, 9:51 AM, Dicebot wrote: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/985 This is awesome. I recall Don had some solid performance numbers for it in his talk, do you have any in the context of D2? -- Andrei
Re: D2 port of Sociomantic CDGC available for early experiments
On Monday, 6 October 2014 at 17:23:55 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 10/6/14, 9:51 AM, Dicebot wrote: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/985 This is awesome. I recall Don had some solid performance numbers for it in his talk, do you have any in the context of D2? -- Andrei No, I didn't get to running any perf test so far. Did PR as soon as test suite passes and commits looked sane. Will do eventually. Any specific project you are interested in? I'd love to see the impact on vibe.d but it is subject to threading/malloc issue right now.
Re: D2 port of Sociomantic CDGC available for early experiments
On 10/6/14, 10:29 AM, Dicebot wrote: On Monday, 6 October 2014 at 17:23:55 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 10/6/14, 9:51 AM, Dicebot wrote: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/985 This is awesome. I recall Don had some solid performance numbers for it in his talk, do you have any in the context of D2? -- Andrei No, I didn't get to running any perf test so far. Did PR as soon as test suite passes and commits looked sane. Will do eventually. Any specific project you are interested in? I'd love to see the impact on vibe.d but it is subject to threading/malloc issue right now. vibe.d would be great to test. Generally any realistic project would be relevant. -- Andrei
Re: DUB 0.9.22 released
Am 06.10.2014 13:36, schrieb bioinfornatics: Thanks for your works, One question, what about makefile support ? Regards It's still in need for a volunteer. The implementation itself should be pretty straightforward (by inheriting from the ProjectGenerator class), but I currently have too much higher priority stuff on my table to get that done (plus generally severely limited time due to an accumulation of work and non-work related things).
Re: DUB 0.9.22 released
On 10/06/2014 02:15 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote: Am 06.10.2014 13:36, schrieb bioinfornatics: Thanks for your works, One question, what about makefile support ? Regards It's still in need for a volunteer. The implementation itself should be pretty straightforward (by inheriting from the ProjectGenerator class), but I currently have too much higher priority stuff on my table to get that done (plus generally severely limited time due to an accumulation of work and non-work related things). I don't suppose there's documentation on the ProjectGenerator class? I was (briefly) looking into subclassing that for a compiler cmdline args output that I think would be helpful, but based on a (again, rather brief) glance at and its subclasses I had some trouble grokking how it worked. I'll have to take a look again though.
Re: DUB 0.9.22 released
On Monday, 6 October 2014 at 18:15:08 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: Am 06.10.2014 13:36, schrieb bioinfornatics: Thanks for your works, One question, what about makefile support ? Regards It's still in need for a volunteer. The implementation itself should be pretty straightforward (by inheriting from the ProjectGenerator class), but I currently have too much higher priority stuff on my table to get that done (plus generally severely limited time due to an accumulation of work and non-work related things). I take a look but without a hacker doc that is not easy. So I have some question ( do nott blame me ) --- why class who inherit from ProjectGenerator: - should to get PackageManager as parameter in ctor (1) while Project(2) struct has a PackageManager. Project struct is send too in the ctor. 1) https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dub/blob/master/source/dub/generators/build.d#L39 2) https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dub/blob/master/source/dub/project.d#L39 --- why method: generateTargets( in GeneratorSettings settings, in TargetInfo[string] targets) take an associative array of targets always you use only one target named m_project.rootPackage.name --- why you assign project (3) this is not done when super is called (4)? 3) https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dub/blob/master/source/dub/generators/build.d#L42 4) https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dub/blob/master/source/dub/generators/generator.d#L48 thanks
