Re: Simplest way to build a DMD compatible C lib, and how to link using DUB.

2016-12-23 Thread hardreset via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Saturday, 17 December 2016 at 04:58:45 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:

On Friday, 16 December 2016 at 22:37:13 UTC, hardreset wrote:

To be honest I was having some odd linking problems anyway. I 
initially wrapped the FT init function in plain D function and 
that kept causing "_FT_ not found" link errors. As soon as 
I took all the actual D functions out and left just FT 
declarations in there it stopped. Even now if I add...


int foo() { return 0; }

to my freetype.d (contains just FT interface declarations)

and call it from font.d (my font class)

i start getting linker errors. Why would adding a plain D 
function suddenly make it sound the linker cant find what it 
needs in the freetype.lib?


The only thing I can think of offhand: did you compile and link 
your freetype.d? As long as it's just interface declarations, 
there's no need to -- it only needs to be on the import path. 
But once you start adding implementations, it needs to be 
compiled and linked into the executable.


Yeah that was it. I had it in a separate folder for libs and 
mistakenly assumed that because it was importing OK that mean it 
was being compiled and linked too. I moved it into the source 
folder and it worked fine! It makes sense now.


thanks for the help!




Re: Simplest way to build a DMD compatible C lib, and how to link using DUB.

2016-12-16 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Friday, 16 December 2016 at 22:37:13 UTC, hardreset wrote:

To be honest I was having some odd linking problems anyway. I 
initially wrapped the FT init function in plain D function and 
that kept causing "_FT_ not found" link errors. As soon as 
I took all the actual D functions out and left just FT 
declarations in there it stopped. Even now if I add...


int foo() { return 0; }

to my freetype.d (contains just FT interface declarations)

and call it from font.d (my font class)

i start getting linker errors. Why would adding a plain D 
function suddenly make it sound the linker cant find what it 
needs in the freetype.lib?


The only thing I can think of offhand: did you compile and link 
your freetype.d? As long as it's just interface declarations, 
there's no need to -- it only needs to be on the import path. But 
once you start adding implementations, it needs to be compiled 
and linked into the executable.


Re: Simplest way to build a DMD compatible C lib, and how to link using DUB.

2016-12-16 Thread hardreset via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Friday, 16 December 2016 at 00:40:07 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:

On Thursday, 15 December 2016 at 20:34:47 UTC, hardreset wrote:

On Thursday, 15 December 2016 at 18:30:14 UTC, hardreset wrote:


I have pragma(lib,**fullpath**) in my freetype.d file, is 
that the correct way?


Never mind, figured it out, I needer to add

"libs": ["libs/freetype27ST"]

to dub.json


The pragma alone should have been enough. Did you get the path 
right? At any rate, if you're adding that line to dub.json, 
then the pragma is redundant. They both do the same thing.


Im pretty sure i did, i tried absolute path, relative, just 
filename, copied from address bar, etc..


To be honest I was having some odd linking problems anyway. I 
initially wrapped the FT init function in plain D function and 
that kept causing "_FT_ not found" link errors. As soon as I 
took all the actual D functions out and left just FT declarations 
in there it stopped. Even now if I add...


int foo() { return 0; }

to my freetype.d (contains just FT interface declarations)

and call it from font.d (my font class)

i start getting linker errors. Why would adding a plain D 
function suddenly make it sound the linker cant find what it 
needs in the freetype.lib?






Re: Simplest way to build a DMD compatible C lib, and how to link using DUB.

2016-12-15 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Thursday, 15 December 2016 at 20:34:47 UTC, hardreset wrote:

On Thursday, 15 December 2016 at 18:30:14 UTC, hardreset wrote:


I have pragma(lib,**fullpath**) in my freetype.d file, is that 
the correct way?


Never mind, figured it out, I needer to add

"libs": ["libs/freetype27ST"]

to dub.json


The pragma alone should have been enough. Did you get the path 
right? At any rate, if you're adding that line to dub.json, then 
the pragma is redundant. They both do the same thing.


Re: Simplest way to build a DMD compatible C lib, and how to link using DUB.

2016-12-15 Thread hardreset via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Thursday, 15 December 2016 at 18:30:14 UTC, hardreset wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 at 03:47:27 UTC, Mike Parker 
wrote:

[1] https://github.com/DerelictOrg/DerelictFT


Thanks, I'm trying the "-m32mscoff" method for now, but I get 
"error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _FT_Init_FreeType 
referenced"


I have pragma(lib,**fullpath**) in my freetype.d file, is that 
the correct way?


Never mind, figured it out, I needer to add

"libs": ["libs/freetype27ST"]

to dub.json



Re: Simplest way to build a DMD compatible C lib, and how to link using DUB.

2016-12-15 Thread hardreset via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Thursday, 15 December 2016 at 03:47:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:

On Wednesday, 14 December 2016 at 23:08:30 UTC, hardreset wrote:


As Basile recommended, DerelictFT[1] will save you from the 
hassle of object formats. It's a dynamic binding, so you don't 
need to link with FreeType at all during compilation. You 
simply call DerelictFT.load during initialization and it will 
load the FreeType DLL for you. However, if your goal is to use 
DLLs, then you either have to use the MS linker as I described 
above or get FreeType into the OMF format (either by compiling 
with DMC or using an object converter).


[1] https://github.com/DerelictOrg/DerelictFT


Thanks, I'm trying the "-m32mscoff" method for now, but I get 
"error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _FT_Init_FreeType 
referenced"


I have pragma(lib,**fullpath**) in my freetype.d file, is that 
the correct way?


Re: Simplest way to build a DMD compatible C lib, and how to link using DUB.

2016-12-14 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Wednesday, 14 December 2016 at 23:08:30 UTC, hardreset wrote:
I built Freetype with MSVC13 and tried to link it but DMD didnt 
like the format, so what should compiler (free) should I use 
for building DMD compatible static libs?


The MS linker produces COFF format. By default, DMD uses the 
OPTLINK linker, which only understands OMF. Assuming DMD is 
configured to find your MSVC installation, you can link directly 
with COFF libraries and objects by passing -m64 or -m32mscoff on 
the DMD command line. With DUB, use -ax86_64 on the command line 
to make it use -m64. Unfortunately, there is currently no such 
option for it to use -m32mscoff, so you need to configure it in 
your dub configuration with a "dflags" directive and make sure 
any dependencies are compiled that way as well.




Once I've build the lib, made a di file, where do I put these 
things in the dub directory structure?


Where ever you want. If you put the di file in your source 
directory, DUB will pick it up automatically. For libraries, I 
usually put them in a 'lib' subdirectory and add this in the 
module with my main method:


version(Windows) pragma(lib, `lib\foo.lib`);

As Basile recommended, DerelictFT[1] will save you from the 
hassle of object formats. It's a dynamic binding, so you don't 
need to link with FreeType at all during compilation. You simply 
call DerelictFT.load during initialization and it will load the 
FreeType DLL for you. However, if your goal is to use DLLs, then 
you either have to use the MS linker as I described above or get 
FreeType into the OMF format (either by compiling with DMC or 
using an object converter).


[1] https://github.com/DerelictOrg/DerelictFT


Re: Simplest way to build a DMD compatible C lib, and how to link using DUB.

2016-12-14 Thread Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Wednesday, 14 December 2016 at 23:08:30 UTC, hardreset wrote:
I built Freetype with MSVC13 and tried to link it but DMD didnt 
like the format, so what should compiler (free) should I use 
for building DMD compatible static libs?


Once I've build the lib, made a di file, where do I put these 
things in the dub directory structure?


thanks,


Yes under win32 you must use Digital Mars C++ compiler, "DMC", 
because it produces OMF objects. That's also the default format 
produced by DMD.


DMC is here: http://www.digitalmars.com/download/freecompiler.html

However note that there's DerelictFT or Deimos freetype if you 
don't want to mess with this problem.


Simplest way to build a DMD compatible C lib, and how to link using DUB.

2016-12-14 Thread hardreset via Digitalmars-d-learn
I built Freetype with MSVC13 and tried to link it but DMD didnt 
like the format, so what should compiler (free) should I use for 
building DMD compatible static libs?


Once I've build the lib, made a di file, where do I put these 
things in the dub directory structure?


thanks,