Re: [digitalradio] Some notes on JT65-on-HF operation

2007-04-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi

Dimension 4 is a nice little program to Always keep your clock
synchronized(..)

You can download it from:
http://www.thinkman.com/dimension4/index.htm

73 de LA5VNA Steinar






Chris Danis wrote:
 Hi all,

 JT65 is a very different mode from more conventional keyboard modes.
 It is designed for EME operation with very weak signals, and to allow
 for just the bare minimum amount of information that defines a contact
 to be exchanged. This leads to some quirks in its operation, which I
 will do my best to explain below (I'm hardly an expert on this -- only
 been trying my hand at it for a few days!).

 This message got a bit longer than I had wanted it to be, so here's a
 quick summary of the points (if you don't follow these, many stations
 will not be able to work you!):
 - Always keep your clock synchronized, to one second or better accuracy
 - Always click the Auto is OFF button to make it so Auto is ON.

 Those who are interested in why, read on...

 The software has a notion of timeslots (as in EME operation). One
 station TXes, beginning at the start of a minute, for 48 seconds, then
 goes to RX for the remaining 12 seconds. The other station calls back
 at the start of the next minute, for 48 seconds, while the first
 station RXes for that full minute. This is the standard that stations
 follow -- if you don't conform to it, they will probably not be able
 to decode you.

 Thankfully, the software will enforce this timing for you if you press
 the Auto is OFF button. The button will then change to Auto is ON
 and will also be highlighted in red. Also tied in with this
 functionality is the Tx First checkbox: if checked, your TX slot
 will be the even minutes of the hour (first meaning first minute of
 the hour). If unchecked, your TX slot will be (you guessed it) the
 odd minutes of the hour. Obviously, one should pick the opposite of
 the station they are trying to work :) While Auto is ON you will
 always TX in your TX period -- so when you are done, make sure to turn
 it off, hi.

 Whether auto is on or off, the software will automatically attempt a
 decode at 52 seconds into the minute. If by the time you've decoded
 you're already into your TX cycle, just press the appropriate TxN
 button on the far right, where N is the number of the message you want
 (you'll see). If you ever need a quick reference on which is the
 appropriate message to send, just hit F5 (or menu item Help - What
 message to send?).

 Also note that decoding isn't an instantaneous procedure: pressing
 Decode while you are less than 52 seconds into the minute will
 attempt to decode last minute's tones again. One must wait for the
 end of the transmission cycle to get the latest decode.

 Hope this helps!

 best  73,
 -chris N2YYZ
  



[digitalradio] free text in JT65A

2007-04-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi all,

Some of you are typing long massages in a JT65A qso on HF and I wonder
how you do that.
Chris N2YYZ wrote Always click the Auto is OFF button to make it so
Auto is ON.  but when Auto is ON is on there is no way I am able to
type in a text. I simply don't have time. Few seconds after decoding a
signal the auto transmission kicks in, and my Norwegian brain is to
slow. My head  will never be able to translate from Norwegian into
English, and get something understandable on the air when the time is
sow extreme limited. I hope this was understandable;)  Is there a trick
here I'm missing?

73 de LA5VNA Steinar




RE: [digitalradio] Some notes on JT65-on-HF operation

2007-04-06 Thread Sergio Manrique Almeida
Thank you, Steinar.

 

I managed to run it on HTTP mode, as couldn't find UDP ports to unblock on
XP.

 

Regards,

Sergio, EA3DU

 

-Mensaje original-
De: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En
nombre de Steinar Aanesland
Enviado el: viernes, 06 de abril de 2007 10:27
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] Some notes on JT65-on-HF operation

 

Hi

Dimension 4 is a nice little program to Always keep your clock
synchronized(..)

You can download it from:
http://www.thinkman http://www.thinkman.com/dimension4/index.htm
.com/dimension4/index.htm

73 de LA5VNA Steinar

Chris Danis wrote:
 Hi all,

 JT65 is a very different mode from more conventional keyboard modes.
 It is designed for EME operation with very weak signals, and to allow
 for just the bare minimum amount of information that defines a contact
 to be exchanged. This leads to some quirks in its operation, which I
 will do my best to explain below (I'm hardly an expert on this -- only
 been trying my hand at it for a few days!).

 This message got a bit longer than I had wanted it to be, so here's a
 quick summary of the points (if you don't follow these, many stations
 will not be able to work you!):
 - Always keep your clock synchronized, to one second or better accuracy
 - Always click the Auto is OFF button to make it so Auto is ON.

 Those who are interested in why, read on...

 The software has a notion of timeslots (as in EME operation). One
 station TXes, beginning at the start of a minute, for 48 seconds, then
 goes to RX for the remaining 12 seconds. The other station calls back
 at the start of the next minute, for 48 seconds, while the first
 station RXes for that full minute. This is the standard that stations
 follow -- if you don't conform to it, they will probably not be able
 to decode you.

 Thankfully, the software will enforce this timing for you if you press
 the Auto is OFF button. The button will then change to Auto is ON
 and will also be highlighted in red. Also tied in with this
 functionality is the Tx First checkbox: if checked, your TX slot
 will be the even minutes of the hour (first meaning first minute of
 the hour). If unchecked, your TX slot will be (you guessed it) the
 odd minutes of the hour. Obviously, one should pick the opposite of
 the station they are trying to work :) While Auto is ON you will
 always TX in your TX period -- so when you are done, make sure to turn
 it off, hi.

 Whether auto is on or off, the software will automatically attempt a
 decode at 52 seconds into the minute. If by the time you've decoded
 you're already into your TX cycle, just press the appropriate TxN
 button on the far right, where N is the number of the message you want
 (you'll see). If you ever need a quick reference on which is the
 appropriate message to send, just hit F5 (or menu item Help - What
 message to send?).

 Also note that decoding isn't an instantaneous procedure: pressing
 Decode while you are less than 52 seconds into the minute will
 attempt to decode last minute's tones again. One must wait for the
 end of the transmission cycle to get the latest decode.

 Hope this helps!

 best  73,
 -chris N2YYZ
 

 



Re: [digitalradio] free text in JT65A

2007-04-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien

A good question Steinar.  I sometimes will write some free text but not in
direct response to the line that just popped up on my screen, usually I am
just adding something like TU Steinar es 73 from NY .  I am not asking
questions like how is the weather in Norway?

Last night, because of the situation you described,  I did the opposite of
what Chris suggested.   I responded manually, waiting to see what the person
said before I replied.  This results in me starting the transmission 10
seconds , or so, late.  The transmission ends on time, so I am not sure what
real impact my 10 second late transmission has on anything.

Andy k3UK


On 4/6/07, Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  Hi all,

Some of you are typing long massages in a JT65A qso on HF and I wonder
how you do that.
Chris N2YYZ wrote Always click the Auto is OFF button to make it so
Auto is ON. but when Auto is ON is on there is no way I am able to
type in a text. I simply don't have time. Few seconds after decoding a
signal the auto transmission kicks in, and my Norwegian brain is to
slow. My head will never be able to translate from Norwegian into
English, and get something understandable on the air when the time is
sow extreme limited. I hope this was understandable;) Is there a trick
here I'm missing?

73 de LA5VNA Steinar

 





--
Andy K3UK
Skype Me :  callto://andyobrien73
www.obriensweb.com


[digitalradio] Unión de Radioaficionados Españoles (URE). RTTY Contest This Weekend

2007-04-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Sponsored by Unión de Radioaficionados Españoles (URE).
Participants: Any licensed amateur station.
Date: From 16:00 UTC April 7th to 16:00 UTC April 8th, 2007.
Mode: RTTY BAUDOT.
Bands: 10, 15, 20, 40 and 80 meters, according to IARU Region 1 band plan.
Classes:
1) Single operator all band EA.
2) Single operator single band EA. (One band is only allowed during
the contest).
3) Single operator all band non-EA.
4) Single operator single band non-EA. (One band is only allowed
during the contest).
5) Multioperator EA, only all bands.
6) Multioperator non-EA, only all bands.
NOTES:
a) The use of cluster is allowed for all classes, but it is not
allowed self-spotting.
b) In the single operator categories only one signal is allowed in the air.
c) In the multioperator categories only one signal is allowed by band.
Contest call: CQ EA TEST.
Valid contacts: Any station can be contacted during the contest. Every
station can be
contacted once per band.
The points and/or multipliers derived from UNIQUE QSOs will be NOT valid.
Exchange: Spanish stations: RST + Province code (see below).
The foreign stations that transmit from the Spanish territory will be
considered as EA stations.
DX stations: RST + QSO number starting with 001. Multi-operator
stations, if used multi TX,
shall report separate serials per band starting with 001.
Scoring:
On 10, 15 and 20 meters, one (1) point for QSO within own continent,
and two (2) points for
QSO outside own continent.
On 40 and 80 m, three (3) points for QSO within own continent, and six
(6) points for QSO
outside own continent.
Multipliers:
- EADX100 entities.
- Spanish Provinces.
- USA, Canada, Japan and Australia call areas (VE3, VE6, W5, JA1...).
NOTES:
1) Each multiplier counts once per band.
2) The first QSO with W, VE, JA and VK stations, on each band, counts
for two multipliers
(EADX100 entity + call area).
3) The first QSO with EA, EA6, EA8 and EA9 stations, on each band,
counts for two
multipliers (EADX100 entity + Province).
Final score: Total QSO points by total multipliers in all bands.
Prizes: Trophy to the winner in each class.
Certificate to the second and third places in each class.
Certificate to the first classified of JA and VK.
Certificates to all operators of the multioperator-stations rewarded.
It is required at least 50 valid QSO to be eligible for any award.
Logs: All logs should be submitted in Cabrillo format via Internet to
the following E-mail
address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Andy K3UK
Skype Me :  callto://andyobrien73
www.obriensweb.com


[digitalradio] Clock sync

2007-04-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Sergio Manrique Almeida
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thank you, Steinar.
 
  
 
 I managed to run it on HTTP mode, as couldn't find UDP ports to
unblock on
 XP.
 

Just what I needed, thanks Steinar.  Since the time change a few weeks
ago here in the USA, my PC would not sync with time.com but this
program allows me to sync and I get to use a facility (University of
Toronto) that is very close.  I think I shall be quite precise now.

Andy K3UK



[digitalradio] Re: Re-inventing the JT65A messages for HF?

2007-04-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien
-Thanks Bill and Jose, I agree.

Andy 

-- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 No, I think it is not a good idea, at least so far.
 
 RRR, RO,  and 73 are shorthand messages, no real text sent, but a combo 
 of tones, and that has adventages at very low levels compared to real 
 text.
 
 Watch the waterfall when you get called and when you get those shortand 
 messages,
 
 73,
 
 Jose, CO2JA
 
 
 
 
 __
 
 V Conferencia Internacional de Energ�a Renovable, Ahorro de Energ�a
y Educaci�n Energ�tica.
 22 al 25 de mayo de 2007
 Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
 http://www.cujae.edu.cu/eventos/cier
 
 Participe en Universidad 2008.
 11 al 15 de febrero del 2008.
 Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
 http://www.universidad2008.cu





[digitalradio] DominoEX Needs Programmer.

2007-04-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Would you like to see DominoEX in MIXW?

* We need an experienced Windows sound card programmer capable of
working with Microsoft MFC and the free Microsoft C compiler in order
to build a definitive DominoEX DLL for MIXW.

* We can offer all documentation and source code for a fully
working program (ZL2AFP's version), as well as source and compiled DLL
for a preliminary (limited but semi-working) DLL written by Denis
UU9JDR of the MIXW team. You can expect support from ZL1BPU, ZL2AFP
and UU9JDR. The FEC details are available from F6CTE - the FEC coding
technique is identical to MFSK16.

* If you believe you have the skills and are prepared to build an
open source freely available DLL compatible with MIXW, please contact
ZL1BPU.  http://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/DOMINO/Index.htm



[digitalradio] Alabama MARS has changed to MT63

2007-04-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I saw a MARS message that says MARS in Alabamba (a USA state)  has
switched to MT63.  Does anyone know when they are active in this mode ?

Andy K3UK



[digitalradio] Digital mode interfaces, which ones ?

2007-04-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I wonder if we can get some general updates about the commercially
available digital mode interfaces available today?   Microham,
Rigblaster, and SignaLink are among the best known but I wonder what
is available at the low end?  If a new ham wanted  a simple one, one
that was well isolated and performed basic rig control only ( no
internal soundcards, no Winkey chips, etc) , what is out there?  Is
there anything under 40 Euros?  I'm happy with mine but I am a little
out of date on this topic.



-- 
Andy K3UK
Skype Me :  callto://andyobrien73
www.obriensweb.com


[digitalradio] Norway propagation on 20M

2007-04-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Northern Europe to Eastern USA is opening up on 20M at 1126 UTC.

112600  8  -12  0.0  -19  2 *  CQ LA5VNA JO591   0
112800 13  -11  0.0  -19  2 *  CQ LA5VNA JO591   0
113000  7  -17  0.1  -22  3 *  K3UK LA5VNA JO59  1   0
113200 10  -21   -21  2   RO  ?
113600 10  -19   -23  3   RRR ?


A lot of folks look for the best SNR but I am fascinated by the
worst.  In the above exchange, -21dB  worked , at least for one brief
exchange.

-- 
Andy K3UK
Skype Me :  callto://andyobrien73
www.obriensweb.com


[digitalradio] K3UK

2007-04-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland

Hi Andy

You were extremely weak . Only one time I was able to hear you.
This is what I captured:

112900  3  -24 -0.2   19  3 *  LA5VNA K3UK FN02  1   0
112900  3  -24 -0.2   19  3 *  LA5VNA K3UK FN02  1   0
113100  2  -25 -0.4   22  3 #  LA5VNA K3UK FN02OOO   1   0
113300  2  -3022  2   RO   
113500  0  -29  6.90 51

I didn't get the RRR so that means the QSO is not accepted ?

73 la5vna Steinar


Re: [digitalradio] free text in JT65A

2007-04-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Andy,

I responded manually, waiting to see what the person said before I
replied. .I all sow use this work around yesterday , but then
somebody start typing use Auto . If I only had this 10 sec , it had
helped me a lot. Even a slow writer like me would be able print
something sensible.

Steinar LA5VNA




Andrew O'Brien wrote:

 A good question Steinar.  I sometimes will write some free text but
 not in direct response to the line that just popped up on my screen,
 usually I am just adding something like TU Steinar es 73 from NY . 
 I am not asking questions like how is the weather in Norway?

 Last night, because of the situation you described,  I did the
 opposite of what Chris suggested.   I responded manually, waiting to
 see what the person said before I replied.  This results in me
 starting the transmission 10 seconds , or so, late.  The transmission
 ends on time, so I am not sure what real impact my 10 second late
 transmission has on anything.

 Andy k3UK


 On 4/6/07, Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all,

 Some of you are typing long massages in a JT65A qso on HF and I wonder
 how you do that.
 Chris N2YYZ wrote Always click the Auto is OFF button to make it so
 Auto is ON. but when Auto is ON is on there is no way I am able to
 type in a text. I simply don't have time. Few seconds after decoding a
 signal the auto transmission kicks in, and my Norwegian brain is to
 slow. My head will never be able to translate from Norwegian into
 English, and get something understandable on the air when the time is
 sow extreme limited. I hope this was understandable;) Is there a trick
 here I'm missing?

 73 de LA5VNA Steinar




 -- 
 Andy K3UK
 Skype Me :  callto://andyobrien73
 www.obriensweb.com http://www.obriensweb.com
  



Re: [digitalradio] Alabama MARS has changed to MT63

2007-04-06 Thread Bill Ayer
That's correct.  Alabama Navy MARS for some years now, and many other states 
both Army and Navy use MT-63 for net traffic.  It is far superior to any other 
method we've found.

Bill
KB4IJ

  - Original Message - 
  From: Andrew O'Brien 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 6:22 AM
  Subject: [digitalradio] Alabama MARS has changed to MT63


  I saw a MARS message that says MARS in Alabamba (a USA state) has
  switched to MT63. Does anyone know when they are active in this mode ?

  Andy K3UK



   

[digitalradio] ADDITIONAL TIPS FOR USING JT65 IN WSJT VERSION 5.9.2

2007-04-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien

From W7GJ

ADDITIONAL TIPS FOR USING JT65 IN WSJT VERSION 5.9.2

* TUTORIAL.  Study the new tutorial at
http://pulsar.princeton.edu/~joe/K1JT/Tutorial_590.txt

* DEMO. K1JT has provided DEMO files on his website, so you can
practice decoding actual .wav files.  There are three secrets to
success in learning how to efficiently and accurately use the JT65
software to decode weak signals:

1. PRACTICE
2. PRACTICE
3. PRACTICE

You can often find local stations willing to practice with you, by
going to http://www.chris.org/cgi-bin/jt65eme
Please remember that it is NOT NECESSARY to have a computer interface
just to practice receiving files!  
Just run audio from the receiver headphone jack to the LINE INPUT on
the computer sound card jack, download the software
and have at it!  Practice makes perfect!

* GRID LOCATOR ENTRY.  Make sure you type your grid locator with the
last two letters in LOWER CASE (for example, DN27ub)
when you enter it in the SETUP/OPTIONS pull down. 

* SPECJT WATERFALL. Some of the big changes in the new JT65 include
the fact that WSJT now includes its own
improved waterfall display, so that it is not necessary to watch
SPECTRAN to see the weak signals.  
There are three sliders along the bottom of the SPECJT screen, as well
as options along the top.  I set mine as follows:
I select OPTIONS/FREQUENCY AXIS and OPTIONS/PALETTE/LINRAD. I set the
speed to 3.  The BRIGHTNESS slider (at the bottom left)
is set approximately in the middle of its range.  The CONTRAST slider
(just to the left of center at the bottom) is set slightly
to the right of center.  The DIGITAL GAIN slider (on the right bottom)
is set so JT65 displays a level between zero and +2 dB.
With the proper settings, the SPECJT screen should show some faint
yellow snow over the 1200-1500Hz range with no signals present.

* SOUND CARD CORRECTION.  With the new version, it also is possible to
enter sound card correction factors for the input and outgoing
audio.  The suggested correction factors are displayed in the lower
left corner of the JT65 screen for the particular sound card
being used in your computer.  This is a big improvement, especially
for laptop computers (whose sound cards were often not so accurate).
Make sure to enter the correction values displayed, by typing them in
under the SETUP/OPTIONS/ (under Rate in and Rate out).

* COMPUTER CLOCK.  Note that you will still have to set your computer
clock accurately, although the new version allows for twice
as much error in your timing. If you do not have a connection to the
internet while you are on the air (so you can automatically 
update the computer clock using DIMENSION 4 or a similar program), or
do not have a GPS unit automatically updating your computer
clock, you should try to manually set it within a second or two of the
correct time by listening to WWV.

* WEAK CW DISPLAY.  Note that you can also use the SPECJT screen while
you are in the JT65 MONITOR mode to display weak CW signals.   
Additional notes on CW EME can be found on my web page under note #10.
Note that on CW, the signals will be ZERO BEAT on the operating
frequencies
specified.  Also, remember what contitutes a contact.  One station
must receive final RRR - then contact is complete.  The way a contact
progresses (either CW or JT65) is listed under the HELP button (or
just press F5) on the JT65 screen.  You must ALTERNATE the messages
through the contact to efficiently make it work.  First station sends
calls, second station sends calls and OOO, first station sends RO,
second station sends RRR.  It is NOT efficient (and often not
successful) if one station simply parrots what they have been receiving.

* DECODE PULL DOWN SETTINGS.  You should make sure that DECODE/JT65 is
set for EXHAUSTIVE. If you have a fast computer, you don't need to 
check anything else under that category.  Only if your computer seems
to take a long time to decode (at the end of a receive sequence), you can 
try changing the setting to DECODE/JT65/FAST or DECODE/JT65/NORMAL. 
Make sure you do not have the DECODE/JT65 AGGRESSIVE ever checked!
That will give you a high percentage of false decodes, and is only for
VERY experienced users who are carefully watching the DT and DF to
determine whether the decodes are real or false.

* SAVE DECODED.  If you have space on your computer, I would suggest
always saving your decoded .wav files as documentation of your contacts.  
You can do this under the SAVE/DECODED button at the top (I would NOT
suggest checking SAVE/ALL).

* MESSAGE SELECTION.  Once the XMIT sequence begins, you can't change
messages #1 or #2, so make sure you decode the incoming message and 
select the appropriat outgoing message before your XMIT period begins!
 You CAN switch to the shorthand messages of RO, RRR and 73,
if that is appropriate, anytime by pressing the little button to the
right of the messages.

*FALSE DECODES.  If you see a weak (low sync and dB values) station
calling you 

Re: [digitalradio] Alabama MARS has changed to MT63

2007-04-06 Thread kv9u
Bill,

What other digital modes did you compare it to and why did you find 
MT-63 superior?

73,

Rick, KV9U



Bill Ayer wrote:
 That's correct.  Alabama Navy MARS for some years now, and many other 
 states both Army and Navy use MT-63 for net traffic.  It is far 
 superior to any other method we've found.
  
 Bill
 KB4IJ
  



[digitalradio] Using the SpecJT to aide in tuning

2007-04-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I got a couple of useful tips today, played around a little and
thought I would pass a long some information to fellow JT65A rookies.

Some of you will have seen the OOO, RO, RRR info  pop up on the
waterfall, I figured there was a a reason for that.  If you line
things up with the position on the waterfall, it will aide in decoding
and keep the frequency difference to a minimum.  Having a wide DF is
viewed as undesirable and results in the frequency being hogged.

Enter the SPECJT.  I had no clue about this display other than it
looked cool.  By it's self it appeared to do nothing.  However if you
have SPECJT and the WJST waterfall on the screen at the same time, you
will notice SPECT responds to clicks on the WJTS mains screen
waterfall.I am told that a good precise frequency can be achieved
by sync'ing  with the tones.

the sync tone would be at 0, and the three red lines will be in the
RO/RRR/73 positions...easy to decode even if timing off.   The lowest
tone is always the sync tone, even when sending the SH messages 
(WD4KPD David)

and Mike VE3FGU added ..

left most green line on the sync tone  ..


So, it seems that our goal should be to find the sync tone, align it
with the left most green line by clicking on in in the JT65A waterfall
and getting the RO/OOO stuff within the three RED lines on SPECJT.

The band had died here, so will have to do more experimenting with
this later today.


Andy K3UK
Skype Me :  callto://andyobrien73
www.obriensweb.com


Re: [digitalradio] K3UK

2007-04-06 Thread Peter L. Jackson
I have been getting both sides of this qso.
Unfortunately i have no 20mx antenna, using a 10mx verticle
to receive.
Theres been a lot of activity on today from around
the world the northern hemisphere stations are coming in this evening.
I've tried JT6M on 10mx across australia , that goes good
as well.
Good DX,
Peter
of87jr
Perth, Western Australia

Andrew O'Brien wrote:

 Yes, not a good contact.  Sorry but glad we got a little close.

 Andy.



 On 4/6/07, *Steinar Aanesland*  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Hi Andy

 You were extremely weak . Only one time I was able to hear you.
 This is what I captured:

 112900 3 -24 -0.2 19 3 * LA5VNA K3UK FN02 1 0
 112900 3 -24 -0.2 19 3 * LA5VNA K3UK FN02 1 0
 113100 2 -25 -0.4 22 3 # LA5VNA K3UK FN02 OOO 1 0
 113300 2 -30 22 2 RO
 113500 0 -29 6.9 0 51

 I didn't get the RRR so that means the QSO is not accepted ?

 73 la5vna Steinar




 -- 
 Andy K3UK
 Skype Me :  callto://andyobrien73
 www.obriensweb.com http://www.obriensweb.com
 

 

 avast! Antivirus http://www.avast.com: Inbound message clean.

 Virus Database (VPS): 000730-4, 05/04/2007
 Tested on: 6/04/2007 9:15:30 PM
 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.





---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 000730-4, 05/04/2007
Tested on: 6/04/2007 9:26:32 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com





[digitalradio] Re: K3UK

2007-04-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien
--Peter, interesting to know that Steinar and I were both heard in WA,
too bad you could not join us.

Tell us more about your 10 metre tests within Australia.

Andy K3UK

- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Peter L. Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 I have been getting both sides of this qso.
 Unfortunately i have no 20mx antenna, using a 10mx verticle
 to receive.
 Theres been a lot of activity on today from around
 the world the northern hemisphere stations are coming in this evening.
 I've tried JT6M on 10mx across australia , that goes good
 as well.
 Good DX,
 Peter
 of87jr
 Perth, Western Australia
 
 Andrew O'Brien wrote:
 
  Yes, not a good contact.  Sorry but glad we got a little close.
 
  Andy.
 
 
 
  On 4/6/07, *Steinar Aanesland*  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  Hi Andy
 
  You were extremely weak . Only one time I was able to hear you.
  This is what I captured:
 
  112900 3 -24 -0.2 19 3 * LA5VNA K3UK FN02 1 0
  112900 3 -24 -0.2 19 3 * LA5VNA K3UK FN02 1 0
  113100 2 -25 -0.4 22 3 # LA5VNA K3UK FN02 OOO 1 0
  113300 2 -30 22 2 RO
  113500 0 -29 6.9 0 51
 
  I didn't get the RRR so that means the QSO is not accepted ?
 
  73 la5vna Steinar
 
 
 
 
  -- 
  Andy K3UK
  Skype Me :  callto://andyobrien73
  www.obriensweb.com http://www.obriensweb.com
  
 
 

 
  avast! Antivirus http://www.avast.com: Inbound message clean.
 
  Virus Database (VPS): 000730-4, 05/04/2007
  Tested on: 6/04/2007 9:15:30 PM
  avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
 Virus Database (VPS): 000730-4, 05/04/2007
 Tested on: 6/04/2007 9:26:32 PM
 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
 http://www.avast.com





Re: [digitalradio] K3UK

2007-04-06 Thread Peter L. Jackson
I have been getting both sides of this qso.
Unfortunately i have no 20mx antenna, using a 10mx verticle
to receive.
Theres been a lot of activity on today from around
the world the northern hemisphere stations are coming in this evening.
I've tried JT6M on 10mx across Australia , that goes good
as well.
Once Simon HB9DRV puts the WSJT code into the DM780
the sky's the limit.
Good DX,
Peter
of87jr
Perth, Western Australia

Andrew O'Brien wrote:

 Yes, not a good contact.  Sorry but glad we got a little close.

 Andy.



 On 4/6/07, *Steinar Aanesland*  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Hi Andy

 You were extremely weak . Only one time I was able to hear you.
 This is what I captured:

 112900 3 -24 -0.2 19 3 * LA5VNA K3UK FN02 1 0
 112900 3 -24 -0.2 19 3 * LA5VNA K3UK FN02 1 0
 113100 2 -25 -0.4 22 3 # LA5VNA K3UK FN02 OOO 1 0
 113300 2 -30 22 2 RO
 113500 0 -29 6.9 0 51

 I didn't get the RRR so that means the QSO is not accepted ?

 73 la5vna Steinar




 -- 
 Andy K3UK
 Skype Me :  callto://andyobrien73
 www.obriensweb.com http://www.obriensweb.com
 

 

 avast! Antivirus http://www.avast.com: Inbound message clean.

 Virus Database (VPS): 000730-4, 05/04/2007
 Tested on: 6/04/2007 9:15:30 PM
 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.





---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 000730-4, 05/04/2007
Tested on: 6/04/2007 9:37:24 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com





Re: [digitalradio] Alabama MARS has changed to MT63

2007-04-06 Thread Bill Ayer
Rick,

We had previously used AMTOR FEC for net traffic.  We tried BPSK MFSK as I 
remember, and probably some others.  More recently also Olivia.   MT-63 seldom 
fails even under noisy conditions.  I can copy it on my mobile radio with 
laptop sitting on the seat with no wire connections at alland my old 
Explorer generates considerable RF and road noise of it's own.

Under fair to good conditions we use 2000 Hz bandwidth (not a problem on MARS 
channels) which is about four times faster and more much more reliable than 
AMTOR.  For broadcast messages our standard is 1000Hz bandwidth.  When things 
get too bad for voice communication, 500 Hz will still generally get through.

Bill
KB4IJ
  - Original Message - 
  From: kv9u 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 7:59 AM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Alabama MARS has changed to MT63


  Bill,

  What other digital modes did you compare it to and why did you find 
  MT-63 superior?

  73,

  Rick, KV9U

  Bill Ayer wrote:
   That's correct. Alabama Navy MARS for some years now, and many other 
   states both Army and Navy use MT-63 for net traffic. It is far 
   superior to any other method we've found.
   
   Bill
   KB4IJ
   



   

Re: [digitalradio] free text in JT65A

2007-04-06 Thread Chris Danis
On 4/6/07, Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Some of you are typing long massages in a JT65A qso on HF and I wonder
  how you do that.
  Chris N2YYZ wrote Always click the Auto is OFF button to make it so
  Auto is ON.  but when Auto is ON is on there is no way I am able to
  type in a text. I simply don't have time. Few seconds after decoding a
  signal the auto transmission kicks in, and my Norwegian brain is to
  slow. My head  will never be able to translate from Norwegian into
  English, and get something understandable on the air when the time is
  sow extreme limited. I hope this was understandable;)  Is there a trick
  here I'm missing?

Steinar,

Usually when I put in a long message, I have it ready to go before my
TX slot (e.g. 73 TNX! BEST-19).  However, you can turn auto off,
type your message, and then turn auto back on when you are done.  You
will begin TXing as soon as you turn it back on, and if only 10 or so
seconds have passed, the other station should still be able to get a
decode.

I have noticed that TXing manually sometimes makes me TX past the end
of my timeslot.  Haven't figured that one out yet.  Auto always seems
to end at the right time, though.

best  73,
-chris N2YYZ


[digitalradio] JT6M on 10 MX

2007-04-06 Thread Peter L. Jackson
-Peter, interesting to know that Steinar and I were both heard in WA,
too bad you could not join us.

Tell us more about your 10 metre tests within Australia.

Andy K3UK
..
Hi Andy in reply to your query we in Australia rode the first wave of
wsjt when it first came out.
Not content to use it only on vhf a select few of us started to use it
on HF, remember this was way back in 2005 !
I have cut and pasted off the logger the event.
http://www.vklogger.com/forum/index.php

Post http://www.vklogger.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=54#54Posted: Sun 
Apr 10, 2005 10:58 amPost subject: WSJT contact between VK2KKR and 
VK6KXW on 10mx  Reply with quote 
http://www.vklogger.com/forum/posting.php?mode=quotep=54

Just a short post to the forum members to advise a successful WSJT
transmission on 10th April 28.334mhz took place at 00:05 to 01:00 
between VK2KKR The Rock Hill, Sthrn NSW QF34MR and VK6KXW Perth OF88ab 
over a 2,837km path.
The modes tried were JT6m, FSK441a, JT65 with the greastest success
acheived on JT6m with decodes ranging from +2 to -15 at the Perth end.
Equipment at the Perth end was a yaesu ft-1000mp mk5, 5/8 wavelength end 
fed vertical on top of the house roof.
Both stations learn t from it and I look forward for many others.
Well done Leigh.


.
Most of the vk/zl guys hang out on Adam Maurer's logger
http://www.vklogger.com/
Here you will find the eme/digital guys for hf and vhf to arrange skeds, 
info
etc.
We tend to keep to ourselves in OZ even though there is only 9,000 hams
they are of a high caliber.
73's
Peter
vk6kxw
of87jr
Perth, Western Australia




---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 000730-4, 05/04/2007
Tested on: 6/04/2007 10:57:51 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com





Re: [digitalradio] K3UK

2007-04-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi Peter,

Great! I have been to Perth some years ago and it gives me therefor an
extra good vibration to see that my signal reached your antenna :)

This is what I am using:

http://home.broadpark.no/~saanes/bilder/antenna.jpg

Not a big thing as you can see ,but with my 100W it does the job :) .
Hope to see you on 20m JT65A some times.

73 de LA5VNA Steinar




Peter L. Jackson wrote:

 I have been getting both sides of this qso.
 Unfortunately i have no 20mx antenna, using a 10mx verticle
 to receive.
 Theres been a lot of activity on today from around
 the world the northern hemisphere stations are coming in this evening.
 I've tried JT6M on 10mx across australia , that goes good
 as well.
 Good DX,
 Peter
 of87jr
 Perth, Western Australia

 Andrew O'Brien wrote:
 
  Yes, not a good contact. Sorry but glad we got a little close.
 
  Andy.
 
 
 
  On 4/6/07, *Steinar Aanesland*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:saanes%40broadpark.no
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:saanes%40broadpark.no wrote:
 
 
  Hi Andy
 
  You were extremely weak . Only one time I was able to hear you.
  This is what I captured:
 
  112900 3 -24 -0.2 19 3 * LA5VNA K3UK FN02 1 0
  112900 3 -24 -0.2 19 3 * LA5VNA K3UK FN02 1 0
  113100 2 -25 -0.4 22 3 # LA5VNA K3UK FN02 OOO 1 0
  113300 2 -30 22 2 RO
  113500 0 -29 6.9 0 51
 
  I didn't get the RRR so that means the QSO is not accepted ?
 
  73 la5vna Steinar
 
 
 
 
  --
  Andy K3UK
  Skype Me : callto://andyobrien73 callto://andyobrien73
  www.obriensweb.com http://www.obriensweb.com
 http://www.obriensweb.com
 
 
  --
 
  avast! Antivirus http://www.avast.com http://www.avast.com:
 Inbound message clean.
 
  Virus Database (VPS): 000730-4, 05/04/2007
  Tested on: 6/04/2007 9:15:30 PM
  avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
 
 

 ---
 avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
 Virus Database (VPS): 000730-4, 05/04/2007
 Tested on: 6/04/2007 9:26:32 PM
 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
 http://www.avast.com http://www.avast.com

  



[digitalradio] j65

2007-04-06 Thread John Bradley
ok I need help. why is it that I can see the messages, and message numbers, 
time sent etc etc

but I can't see any callsigns? Can copy RO and 73 etc etc at -29db on the 
waterfall and understand how those tones work.

other people have been seeing me yet i can't copy a callsign.. 
Grrr!

John
VE5MU



Re: [digitalradio] DominoEX mode

2007-04-06 Thread kv9u
I have not heard many comments about DEX, other than the ones that I 
have made. Has anyone being having some testing experiences? Good or bad?

When I first tested it against other modes some time back, I was very 
disappointed in the performance. I suppose this is due in part to the 
expectation that if a new mode is created, it should be better in at 
least some ways to the existing modes. When Patrick employed FEC, this 
did make the mode perform better for my testing as long as the QRN 
levels were not too severe. Of course the speed was cut in half so that 
speeds much slower than 11 baud were not optimum for keyboarding. I 
really had high hopes that this was going to be a good general purpose 
mode as it is also easy to tune in and not too wide and has many speed 
choices. My recent experiments were again disappointing because it does 
not seem to perform well on the lower bands with high QRN plus severe 
static crashes.

I wonder if we could develop some guidelines for which digital modes 
work best with different conditions? I like to think I have a feel for 
many of these modes, but I probably don't have a very accurate picture 
since there are so many variables.  Or maybe there is something 
available that is more recent than the excellent UK critique that was 
made of several modes a few year ago?

73,

Rick, KV9U



Andrew O'Brien wrote:
 Would you like to see DominoEX in MIXW?

 * We need an experienced Windows sound card programmer capable of
 working with Microsoft MFC and the free Microsoft C compiler in order
 to build a definitive DominoEX DLL for MIXW.

 * We can offer all documentation and source code for a fully
 working program (ZL2AFP's version), as well as source and compiled DLL
 for a preliminary (limited but semi-working) DLL written by Denis
 UU9JDR of the MIXW team. You can expect support from ZL1BPU, ZL2AFP
 and UU9JDR. The FEC details are available from F6CTE - the FEC coding
 technique is identical to MFSK16.

 * If you believe you have the skills and are prepared to build an
 open source freely available DLL compatible with MIXW, please contact
 ZL1BPU.  http://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/DOMINO/Index.htm
   



Re: [digitalradio] j65

2007-04-06 Thread Danny Douglas
Your not alone John.  I havent seen one all morning.  

Danny Douglas N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all
DX 2-6 years each
.
QSL LOTW-buro- direct
As courtesy I upload to eQSL but if you
use that - also pls upload to LOTW
or hard card.

moderator  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
  - Original Message - 
  From: John Bradley 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 1:28 PM
  Subject: [digitalradio] j65


  ok I need help. why is it that I can see the messages, and message numbers, 
time sent etc etc

  but I can't see any callsigns? Can copy RO and 73 etc etc at -29db on the 
waterfall and understand how those tones work.

  other people have been seeing me yet i can't copy a 
callsign.. Grrr!

  John
  VE5MU

   


--


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.26/748 - Release Date: 4/5/2007 
3:33 PM


Re: [digitalradio] j65

2007-04-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Strange!  It is crowded on 14.076 right now!

73 de LA5VNA Steinar



Danny Douglas wrote:

 Your not alone John.  I havent seen one all morning. 
  
 Danny Douglas N7DC
 ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
 SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all
 DX 2-6 years each
 .
 QSL LOTW-buro- direct
 As courtesy I upload to eQSL but if you
 use that - also pls upload to LOTW
 or hard card.
  
 moderator  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk

 - Original Message -
 *From:* John Bradley mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 *Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2007 1:28 PM
 *Subject:* [digitalradio] j65

 ok I need help. why is it that I can see the messages, and message
 numbers, time sent etc etc
  
 but I can't see any callsigns? Can copy RO and 73 etc etc at -29db
 on the waterfall and understand how those tones work.
  
 other people have been seeing me yet i can't copy a
 callsign.. Grrr!
  
 John
 VE5MU
  

 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.26/748 - Release Date:
 4/5/2007 3:33 PM

  



[digitalradio] Fwd: ] Feld Hell Spring Sprint - 1st Day, 4/7/2007, 1:00 pm

2007-04-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien

-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Date: 6 Apr 2007 17:56:55 -
Subject: [illinoisdigitalham] Feld Hell Spring Sprint - 1st Day, 4/7/2007,
1:00 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reminder from:   *illinoisdigitalham Yahoo!
Grouphttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/illinoisdigitalham/cal
*   Title:   Feld Hell Spring Sprint - 1st Day   Date:   Saturday April 7,
2007 Time:   1:00 pm - 11:00 pm  Location:
http://www.feldhellclub.org/Frequencies.htm Notes:
http://www.feldhellclub.org/sprint%20spring%2007.htm
  Get reminders on your mobile, Yahoo! Messenger, and email.
Edit reminder optionshttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/illinoisdigitalham/cal?v=75
Copyright (c) 2007  Yahoo! Inc. http://www.yahoo.com/ All Rights
Reserved | Terms
of Service http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ | Privacy
Policyhttp://privacy.yahoo.com/privacy/us



--
Andy K3UK
Skype Me :  callto://andyobrien73
www.obriensweb.com


Re: [digitalradio] j65

2007-04-06 Thread Danny Douglas
No- I am not saying that I dont hear or see anything on the waterfall,  I am
not seeing any call signs print out.
In fact, I am no longer even watching.  Ive gone back to tyrying to work
N8S.
Danny Douglas N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all
DX 2-6 years each
.
QSL LOTW-buro- direct
As courtesy I upload to eQSL but if you
use that - also pls upload to LOTW
or hard card.

moderator  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
- Original Message - 
From: Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] j65


 Strange!  It is crowded on 14.076 right now!

 73 de LA5VNA Steinar



 Danny Douglas wrote:
 
  Your not alone John.  I havent seen one all morning.
 
  Danny Douglas N7DC
  ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
  SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all
  DX 2-6 years each
  .
  QSL LOTW-buro- direct
  As courtesy I upload to eQSL but if you
  use that - also pls upload to LOTW
  or hard card.
 
  moderator  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
 
  - Original Message -
  *From:* John Bradley mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
  mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
  *Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2007 1:28 PM
  *Subject:* [digitalradio] j65
 
  ok I need help. why is it that I can see the messages, and message
  numbers, time sent etc etc
 
  but I can't see any callsigns? Can copy RO and 73 etc etc at -29db
  on the waterfall and understand how those tones work.
 
  other people have been seeing me yet i can't copy a
  callsign.. Grrr!
 
  John
  VE5MU
 
 

  
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.26/748 - Release Date:
  4/5/2007 3:33 PM
 
 




 Announce your digital  presence via our DX Cluster
telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

 Our other groups:

 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wnyar
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Omnibus97


 Yahoo! Groups Links





 -- 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.26/748 - Release Date: 4/5/2007
3:33 PM





Re: [digitalradio] j65

2007-04-06 Thread John Becker
I have not had it on all day till right now but,
I'll keep en eye on it this afternoon.

John, W0JAB

At 01:48 PM 4/6/2007, you wrote:
No- I am not saying that I dont hear or see anything on the waterfall,  I am
not seeing any call signs print out.
In fact, I am no longer even watching.  Ive gone back to tyrying to work
N8S.
Danny Douglas N7DC














Re: [digitalradio] Digital mode interfaces, which ones ?

2007-04-06 Thread kv9u
One thing that confused me a bit was that the different claims of each 
interface make them appear to be quite good but they may neglect to 
mention that the interface only does part of what you may want. The main 
issues are:

1) Rig control through some kind of interface specific to that brand or 
model. Examples would be RS-232 that some rigs can connect to directly 
(but now need an USB to COM adapter for most computers), or for ICOM, 
CI-V control.

2) Switching the PTT either via the above, done through the interface, 
if it can support that, or via a separate PTT keying circuit. Some use 
the presence of audio out to trigger a circuit that can then, in turn, 
key the PTT, e.g., Tigertronics Signalink. Some can use the audio itself 
to key the radio through VOX, which I have done with older Kenwood and 
also Ten Tec rigs. Not possible with ICOM, unless using the microphone 
connector on the front panel.

3) Isolation of the audio lines, typically the Line In and Line Out. 
Most sound card outputs seem to be line level speaker outputs, but to 
actually drive a speaker would need to be amplified, thus they are 
actually a line level output and ideal for radio interfacing levels. 
Sometimes there is no Line In so you have to use Microphone In and this 
may require padding down the signal (example: notebook computers).

4)  Keying of CW or FSK through special circuits. This is mostly 
available on the more expensive interfaces.

The only units that combine the software control, the audio line 
isolation, and also the keying of CW and FSK, tend to be the more 
expensive units such as the microham. The price is very high at $300 or 
more and lately they seem to have increased a bit from the recent past.

Not all interfaces always isolate both audio lines, e.g., some Rigblasters.

There are some very low cost and simple interfaces for some rigs such as 
the ICOM or older Ten Tec rigs that use the CI-V, but you still have to 
come up with separate audio isolation and separate keying if you want CW 
or FSK and I find it difficult at times to sift and winnow through the 
advertising hype.

The first thing to do would be to take stock of your rig(s) and 
determine what kind of interfacing is really required and go from there.

I don't think that I have seen any low cost interfaces that can do both 
rig control and audio line isolation. Most of the lower cost ones will 
control PTT and isolate the audio lines. But your rig may not need a 
special interface for rig control if it can use an RS-232 serial 
connection.

73,

Rick, KV9U


Andrew O'Brien wrote:
 I wonder if we can get some general updates about the commercially
 available digital mode interfaces available today?   Microham,
 Rigblaster, and SignaLink are among the best known but I wonder what
 is available at the low end?  If a new ham wanted  a simple one, one
 that was well isolated and performed basic rig control only ( no
 internal soundcards, no Winkey chips, etc) , what is out there?  Is
 there anything under 40 Euros?  I'm happy with mine but I am a little
 out of date on this topic.



   



Re: [digitalradio] Some notes on JT65-on-HF operation

2007-04-06 Thread Jose A. Amador
Sergio Manrique Almeida wrote:

  I managed to run it on HTTP mode, as couldn’t find UDP ports to
  unblock on XP.

  Regards,

  Sergio, EA3DU

  -Mensaje original-

I have used nistime-32 where firewalls do not block time synchronization.
Works very well.

At home, I am using F6CTE' s clock 1.6 (registered) and syncing to CHU 
whenever
necessary and possible.

73,

Jose, CO2JA



__

V Conferencia Internacional de Energía Renovable, Ahorro de Energía y Educación 
Energética.
22 al 25 de mayo de 2007
Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
http://www.cujae.edu.cu/eventos/cier

Participe en Universidad 2008.
11 al 15 de febrero del 2008.
Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
http://www.universidad2008.cu



Announce your digital  presence via our DX Cluster telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

Our other groups:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wnyar
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Omnibus97 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


[digitalradio] Notes on JT65-on-HF part deux: decoding signals

2007-04-06 Thread Chris Danis

Hi all,

My last message seemed to be modestly well-received, and since then I've
received / seen a number of questions regarding decoding JT65 signals, so
here's my stab at addressing those.  Remember that I'm a newbie myself: I
haven't even been playing around for WSJT for a whole week!  Certainly don't
hesitate to correct me if I say anything wrong, or to ask further questions.

Anatomy of a JT65A signal
Although JT65A is always a MFSK mode, there are two fundamental types of
JT65A signals: the full text ones used to send CQs, exchange callsigns and
signal reports, or any arbitrary text, and the shorthand signals used to
send RO, RRR, and 73.  Both kinds of messages have a sync tone and other
tones -- in the case of full text messages, many other tones, and in the
case of shorthand messages, just one other tone.  However, the sync tone is
always the tone lowest in frequency, and in my experience with HF operation,
almost always between 1200 and 1300Hz (assuming you are tuned to the same
frequency as the transmitting station).  (For the sake of completeness, I
should also note here that only one tone is transmitted at any given time,
and that transitions between tones are done in a phase-continuous manner.)

Note on full text messages: arbitrary text can be, at most, 13 characters.
For those of you who have noticed that e.g. K3UK N2YYZ FN12   OOO is quite
a bit longer than 13 characters, JT65 has a special compression scheme for
common message components, like CQ, QRZ, OOO, and callsigns, which it
uses in the standard exchanges.

Decoding basics
Start up WSJT.  Make sure Freeze is unchecked.  Examine the SpecJT
window.  You should see a long green bar at the top of your passband.  This
green bar represents the frequency range that WSJT will search for signals
when it attempts a decode.  That's right -- it attempts to decode anything
it can find in that range (as long as the sync tone falls within the green
bar, it should just work).  This is a feature designed to make
compensating for EME Doppler easy.  If there's a signal that you can hear,
or even that you cannot hear, WSJT should decode it.  However, you will
probably need to increase your Recording Settings line in/microphone
slider to more than you use for other digital modes.  The WSJT documentation
states that the RX noise figure should be around 0dB while you are
receiving just noise.  I usually don't pump things up this high, but I do
make sure it's above -10dB (the associated status indication turns red if
this condition isn't met).  If you can't use your soundcard's mixer to get
things this high, the rightmost slider at the bottom of the SpecJT window is
Digital gain and can increase audio levels more.

(Aside: here's a point where I would appreciate feedback from others who
have been successful.  How high do you usually turn things up?  Am I wrong
here?)

Also remember that you will not decode what you just heard until the full
minute has passed (I said 52 seconds in my last message; a more accurate
figure is something like 55 seconds).  This is just due to the nature of the
protocol: each JT65A transmission is sent as a single FEC'd block, which is
one of the things that gives it the weak-signal abilities for which it is
known.

More advanced decoding
There are a lot of knobs and buttons to play with on the WSJT decoder.  I'll
start with the more important ones...

Clicking in the SpecJT window (or on the red line plot in the main window)
will set the clicked frequency as the frequency of the sync tone.  I'll
reiterate that -- when you click on something in the waterfall, it should
always be the leftmost sync tone!  Once you've given WSJT a frequency value
this way, you can check Freeze, which locks the search for the sync tone
down to within Tol Hz of the frequency you selected.  You can vary Tol by
left or right-clicking on it.  Watch the length of the green bar in the
SpecJT window change as you do this.

(Cool tip: in the cases where multiple stations have both transmitted in the
same timeslot (with a slight frequency difference), I have often been able
to decode both transmissions by setting Tol to 10, clicking one sync tone,
decoding, and then clicking the other and decoding.)

Once you've tuned a station, you should leave Freeze on.  It gives you a
little more sensitivity, (I think) decreases decode times slightly, and also
makes the shorthand signals (RO/RRR/73) decode without question marks.  Once
you've clicked on the sync tone of a station, SpecJT also shows you helper
red ticks on the frequency scale, that indicate where tones for RO, RRR, and
73 will be seen (from left to right).

NB is what you'd expect -- some sort of noise blanking.  I've left it on,
but I'm not sure if it's actually necessary.  Zap somehow attempts to
zap away receiver birdies.  I usually keep this off.  Enabling either
probably reduces sensitivity slightly.

There's another feature of WSJT that is useful for very weak signals -- so
weak that they can't be 

Re: [digitalradio] Alabama MARS has changed to MT63

2007-04-06 Thread kv9u
As a heavy user of AMTOR, mostly ARQ mode though, twenty years ago, I 
would have to say that this mode is not very robust. There were many 
times that the signals were still pretty good, but the mode would begin 
to allow errors to come through (it had a mediocre quality ARQ), or 
would completely stop any further throughput. The FEC mode is not that 
good either, but I suppose you wanted it for unconnected broadcasts. And 
it does not have upper and lower case ASCII code characters.

BPSK is not very robust at all but works well under weak conditions if 
there is not too many difficulties with the ionosphere.

I have had poor results with MT-63 working through severe QRN, but maybe 
we will have to revisit that mode again to do another comparison. I 
don't think that we tried the narrow 500 Hz version of MT-63. Maybe 
that would compete well against MFSK16/8 which so far has worked the 
best for us, even though a pain to get it tuned in.

73,

Rick, KV9U




Bill Ayer wrote:
 Rick,
  
 We had previously used AMTOR FEC for net traffic.  We tried BPSK MFSK 
 as I remember, and probably some others.  More recently also Olivia.  
  MT-63 seldom fails even under noisy conditions.  I can copy it on my 
 mobile radio with laptop sitting on the seat with no wire connections 
 at alland my old Explorer generates considerable RF and road noise 
 of it's own.
  
 Under fair to good conditions we use 2000 Hz bandwidth (not a problem 
 on MARS channels) which is about four times faster and more much more 
 reliable than AMTOR.  For broadcast messages our standard is 1000Hz 
 bandwidth.  When things get too bad for voice communication, 500 Hz 
 will still generally get through.
  
 Bill
 KB4IJ

 - Original Message -
 *From:* kv9u mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 *Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2007 7:59 AM
 *Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] Alabama MARS has changed to MT63

 Bill,

 What other digital modes did you compare it to and why did you find
 MT-63 superior?

 73,

 Rick, KV9U

 Bill Ayer wrote:
  That's correct. Alabama Navy MARS for some years now, and many
 other
  states both Army and Navy use MT-63 for net traffic. It is far
  superior to any other method we've found.
 
  Bill
  KB4IJ
 

  



[digitalradio] Re: Notes on JT65-on-HF part deux: decoding signals

2007-04-06 Thread ad1y1
Thanks for the information Chris.  Very helpful and much appreciated.

Happy Easter.

73,

Tony, AD1Y


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Chris Danis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 My last message seemed to be modestly well-received, and since then 
I've
 received / seen a number of questions regarding decoding JT65 
signals, so
 here's my stab at addressing those.  Remember that I'm a newbie 
myself: I
 haven't even been playing around for WSJT for a whole week!  
Certainly don't
 hesitate to correct me if I say anything wrong, or to ask further 
questions.
 
 Anatomy of a JT65A signal
 Although JT65A is always a MFSK mode, there are two fundamental 
types of
 JT65A signals: the full text ones used to send CQs, exchange 
callsigns and
 signal reports, or any arbitrary text, and the shorthand signals 
used to
 send RO, RRR, and 73.  Both kinds of messages have a sync tone 
and other
 tones -- in the case of full text messages, many other tones, and 
in the
 case of shorthand messages, just one other tone.  However, the sync 
tone is
 always the tone lowest in frequency, and in my experience with HF 
operation,
 almost always between 1200 and 1300Hz (assuming you are tuned to 
the same
 frequency as the transmitting station).  (For the sake of 
completeness, I
 should also note here that only one tone is transmitted at any 
given time,
 and that transitions between tones are done in a phase-continuous 
manner.)
 
 Note on full text messages: arbitrary text can be, at most, 13 
characters.
 For those of you who have noticed that e.g. K3UK N2YYZ FN12   OOO 
is quite
 a bit longer than 13 characters, JT65 has a special compression 
scheme for
 common message components, like CQ, QRZ, OOO, and callsigns, 
which it
 uses in the standard exchanges.
 
 Decoding basics
 Start up WSJT.  Make sure Freeze is unchecked.  Examine the SpecJT
 window.  You should see a long green bar at the top of your 
passband.  This
 green bar represents the frequency range that WSJT will search for 
signals
 when it attempts a decode.  That's right -- it attempts to decode 
anything
 it can find in that range (as long as the sync tone falls within 
the green
 bar, it should just work).  This is a feature designed to make
 compensating for EME Doppler easy.  If there's a signal that you 
can hear,
 or even that you cannot hear, WSJT should decode it.  However, you 
will
 probably need to increase your Recording Settings line 
in/microphone
 slider to more than you use for other digital modes.  The WSJT 
documentation
 states that the RX noise figure should be around 0dB while you are
 receiving just noise.  I usually don't pump things up this high, 
but I do
 make sure it's above -10dB (the associated status indication turns 
red if
 this condition isn't met).  If you can't use your soundcard's mixer 
to get
 things this high, the rightmost slider at the bottom of the SpecJT 
window is
 Digital gain and can increase audio levels more.
 
 (Aside: here's a point where I would appreciate feedback from 
others who
 have been successful.  How high do you usually turn things up?  Am 
I wrong
 here?)
 
 Also remember that you will not decode what you just heard until 
the full
 minute has passed (I said 52 seconds in my last message; a more 
accurate
 figure is something like 55 seconds).  This is just due to the 
nature of the
 protocol: each JT65A transmission is sent as a single FEC'd block, 
which is
 one of the things that gives it the weak-signal abilities for which 
it is
 known.
 
 More advanced decoding
 There are a lot of knobs and buttons to play with on the WSJT 
decoder.  I'll
 start with the more important ones...
 
 Clicking in the SpecJT window (or on the red line plot in the main 
window)
 will set the clicked frequency as the frequency of the sync tone.  
I'll
 reiterate that -- when you click on something in the waterfall, it 
should
 always be the leftmost sync tone!  Once you've given WSJT a 
frequency value
 this way, you can check Freeze, which locks the search for the 
sync tone
 down to within Tol Hz of the frequency you selected.  You can 
vary Tol by
 left or right-clicking on it.  Watch the length of the green bar in 
the
 SpecJT window change as you do this.
 
 (Cool tip: in the cases where multiple stations have both 
transmitted in the
 same timeslot (with a slight frequency difference), I have often 
been able
 to decode both transmissions by setting Tol to 10, clicking one 
sync tone,
 decoding, and then clicking the other and decoding.)
 
 Once you've tuned a station, you should leave Freeze on.  It 
gives you a
 little more sensitivity, (I think) decreases decode times slightly, 
and also
 makes the shorthand signals (RO/RRR/73) decode without question 
marks.  Once
 you've clicked on the sync tone of a station, SpecJT also shows 
you helper
 red ticks on the frequency scale, that indicate where tones for RO, 
RRR, and
 73 will be seen (from left to right).
 
 NB is what you'd expect -- some sort 

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Reed Solomon Identifier

2007-04-06 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
Vojtech,

Thank you for figuring this out.

I had thought that the mode ID was sent in the mode, and that all modes 
were decoded in parallel to see which one resulted in the ECC-protected 
key codeword.  The advantage of senfing the mode ID using the mode 
itseld is that propagation characteristics that favor one mode over 
another will not cause failure to ID or the converse (copy of ID but 
failure to copy the actual transmission).

All my questions had been with this belief in mind.

73,
Leigh/WA5ZNU
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 8:24 pm, Vojtech Bubnik wrote:
 Hi Patrick.

On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 8:24 pm, Vojtech Bubnik wrote:
 Hi Patrick.

  you send a heavily FEC protected keyword in the desired mode.
  you do a parallel decode of all modes, de-FEC all and look which one
  matches the the codeword ?
  Yes it is. But it is not only done for one frequency, it is done for
 all frequencies in the band.

 I played with MultiPSK and listened to the generated RS sequence. In
 my opinion it is always the same modulation. According to my ears and
 spectrogram it seems to be some kind of MFSK modulation, always the
 same number of tones and symbol speed.

 Please correct me, but I think there is a misunderstanding on the
 list. I suppose that the RS ID is very similar to Olivia, there are
 three differences though and I thing we have discussed it by personal
 e-mails.

 - Olivia uses Hadamard/Welsh transformation, RS uses Reed Solomon
 block code
 - Olivia is decoded parallel on a constraned band, RS is decoded
 parallel on the whole sound card spectrum. The channel separation is
 half tone.
 - RS code sends just one block with the mode ID.

 Olivia and RS decode both a lot of channels in parallel (at least the
 original Olivia code from Pawel Jalocha does that) and it selects the
 one, which gives highest correlation. This automatically gives the
 answer for other party frequency.

 I received the RS code from Patrick, but I did not add it to
 PocketDigi yet. I am busy now with firmware programming of ATS-3A, I
 hope to teach it to modulate the single tone modes by programming its
 DDS. It will be the ultimate portable digital set, hi.

 73, Vojtech OK1IAK



Re: [digitalradio] ADDITIONAL TIPS FOR USING JT65 IN WSJT VERSION 5.9.2

2007-04-06 Thread Jose A. Amador
Andrew O'Brien wrote:

  From W7GJ

  ADDITIONAL TIPS FOR USING JT65 IN WSJT VERSION 5.9.2

  * TUTORIAL.  Study the new tutorial at
  http://pulsar.princeton.edu/~joe/K1JT/Tutorial_590.txt

Got a 404 error on this link. Can someone tell the right one if not 
already outdated ?

73,

Jose, CO2JA




__

V Conferencia Internacional de Energía Renovable, Ahorro de Energía y Educación 
Energética.
22 al 25 de mayo de 2007
Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
http://www.cujae.edu.cu/eventos/cier

Participe en Universidad 2008.
11 al 15 de febrero del 2008.
Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
http://www.universidad2008.cu


Re: [digitalradio] j65

2007-04-06 Thread Jose A. Amador
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
  Strange!  It is crowded on 14.076 right now!

  73 de LA5VNA Steinar

And on the sides too...I see quite a few that do not like to make lines 
until the frequency clears up.

73,

Jose, CO2JA




__

V Conferencia Internacional de Energía Renovable, Ahorro de Energía y Educación 
Energética.
22 al 25 de mayo de 2007
Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
http://www.cujae.edu.cu/eventos/cier

Participe en Universidad 2008.
11 al 15 de febrero del 2008.
Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
http://www.universidad2008.cu


Re: [digitalradio] ADDITIONAL TIPS FOR USING JT65 IN WSJT VERSION 5.9.2

2007-04-06 Thread Chuck Mayfield
Try http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/Documentation.htm

73, Chuck, AA5J

At 03:41 PM 4/6/2007, Jose A. Amador wrote:

  * TUTORIAL. Study the new tutorial at
  
 http://pulsar.princeton.edu/~joe/K1JT/Tutorial_590.txthttp://pulsar.princeton.edu/~joe/K1JT/Tutorial_590.txt

Got a 404 error on this link. Can someone tell the right one if not
already outdated ?

73,

Jose, CO2JA

__

V Conferencia Internacional de Energía 
Renovable, Ahorro de Energía y Educación Energética.
22 al 25 de mayo de 2007
Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
http://www.cujae.edu.cu/eventos/cierhttp://www.cujae.edu.cu/eventos/cier

Participe en Universidad 2008.
11 al 15 de febrero del 2008.
Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
http://www.universidad2008.cuhttp://www.universidad2008.cu




Re: [digitalradio] ADDITIONAL TIPS FOR USING JT65 IN WSJT VERSION 5.9.2

2007-04-06 Thread Jose A. Amador

Thank you, Chuck. That one works, but that tutorial seems to be 
outdated. I did not find it there.

Nevertheless, I already copied all the pdf' s there.

73,

Jose, CO2JA



Chuck Mayfield wrote:

  Try http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/Documentation.htm

  73, Chuck, AA5J





__

V Conferencia Internacional de Energía Renovable, Ahorro de Energía y Educación 
Energética.
22 al 25 de mayo de 2007
Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
http://www.cujae.edu.cu/eventos/cier

Participe en Universidad 2008.
11 al 15 de febrero del 2008.
Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
http://www.universidad2008.cu


Re: [digitalradio] John VE5MU

2007-04-06 Thread John Bradley
I am back there tonight was on 20 for a short while saw a bunch of 
european stations and a ZL2 on a band that seems absolutely
dead to any other mode

John
VE5MU



  - Original Message - 
  From: Rick Westerfield 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 5:48 PM
  Subject: RE: [digitalradio] John VE5MU



  Yes, and I saw him too on Thursday night about 9:30 or 10 Central time but I 
cannot get my rig to key.



  Rick




--

  From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Andrew O'Brien
  Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 8:53 PM
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [digitalradio] John VE5MU



  See you John on 7076

  015100 9 -7 2.3 0 3 * VE5MU DO70 1 0

  -- 
  Andy K3UK
  Skype Me : callto://andyobrien73
  www.obriensweb.com



   


--


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.26/748 - Release Date: 4/5/2007 
3:33 PM



[digitalradio] JT65A on 40m

2007-04-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi,

I am calling on 7076 USB 23:30 UTC.
Copy me any one ?

LA5VNA Steinar


Re: [digitalradio] Some notes on JT65-on-HF operation

2007-04-06 Thread w6ids
I downloaded the utility yesterday.  It works as advertised.
The clock is right on the mark.  Nice addition, just as you
say.  Looks like it will eliminate any problems regarding
clock accuracy and JT65A.

Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN

- Original Message - 
From: Steinar Aanesland 
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 3:27 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Some notes on JT65-on-HF operation

Hi

Dimension 4 is a nice little program to Always keep your clock
synchronized(..)



[digitalradio] help prevent qrm

2007-04-06 Thread David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD
20m was a mess today, everyone planting on 076.

this is not necessary !  try this...

set in spectrum the jt65 DF axis option

freeze the program to 0, with tol to 200

tune whichever station you wish to tune by shifting
your dial to place the sync tone on 0

the 200cps tol will effectively give you a filter 400cps
wide around the other stations rf freq and it will not
decode anything outside the window, this eliminates lots
of qrm to you.  if you rig cant quite tune that close, when
most of the other stations tones are withing that window
you can re-freeze

the idea is to not use a large DF and take up more space
than needed, and spread everyone out a bit.

300cps is more than enough to ensure no qrm.

daivd/wd4kpd




[digitalradio] Re: help prevent qrm

2007-04-06 Thread Bill McLaughlin
Echo...

No need for everyone to be on the same exact freq..spread out abit. 
200 Hz is usually enough. You can work multiple qso's at the same 
time if you watch the DF...but not if everyone is one the same freq 
during the same sequence..

73

Bill N9DSJ



--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 20m was a mess today, everyone planting on 076.
 
 this is not necessary !  try this...
 
 set in spectrum the jt65 DF axis option
 
 freeze the program to 0, with tol to 200
 
 tune whichever station you wish to tune by shifting
 your dial to place the sync tone on 0
 
 the 200cps tol will effectively give you a filter 400cps
 wide around the other stations rf freq and it will not
 decode anything outside the window, this eliminates lots
 of qrm to you.  if you rig cant quite tune that close, when
 most of the other stations tones are withing that window
 you can re-freeze
 
 the idea is to not use a large DF and take up more space
 than needed, and spread everyone out a bit.
 
 300cps is more than enough to ensure no qrm.
 
 daivd/wd4kpd





Re: [digitalradio] help prevent qrm

2007-04-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien

Well Duh!  THANKS David, I have been pulling my hair out tryin to figure the
scale out based on earlier advice and low-and-behold I did not have DF Axis
selected.  NOW I see the zero on the scale.  Now off to pratice some more.

Andy K3UK


On 4/6/07, David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  20m was a mess today, everyone planting on 076.

this is not necessary ! try this...

set in spectrum the jt65 DF axis option

freeze the program to 0, with tol to 200

tune whichever station you wish to tune by shifting
your dial to place the sync tone on 0

the 200cps tol will effectively give you a filter 400cps
wide around the other stations rf freq and it will not
decode anything outside the window, this eliminates lots
of qrm to you. if you rig cant quite tune that close, when
most of the other stations tones are withing that window
you can re-freeze

the idea is to not use a large DF and take up more space
than needed, and spread everyone out a bit.

300cps is more than enough to ensure no qrm.

daivd/wd4kpd

 





--
Andy K3UK
Skype Me :  callto://andyobrien73
www.obriensweb.com


[digitalradio] Re: Digital mode interfaces, which ones ?

2007-04-06 Thread Leslie Elliott
If anyone is interested in a low cost interface, and is willing and able
to stuff and solder a PC board, check out the Fox Delta SC-1 offered
by Dinesh Dajjar VU2FD in India. 
http://www.foxdelta.com/products/soundcard.htm
http://www.foxdelta.com/products/soundcard.htm
It did cost $18 US plus $5 air mail to the states, but I see it has gone
up to $28 + shipping.  Still a inexpensive alternative, and it is fairly
easy to construct.  It has both  input and output isolation, and also
includes a OptoIsolator for PTT.  I am very happy with mine, and the
only hard part is installing it in an enclosure, which is not provided.

73 de KCØPTO
Les
  http://www.foxdelta.com/products/soundcard.htm --- In
digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, kv9u [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I don't think that I have seen any low cost interfaces that can do
both
 rig control and audio line isolation. Most of the lower cost ones will
 control PTT and isolate the audio lines. But your rig may not need a
 special interface for rig control if it can use an RS-232 serial
 connection.

 73,

 Rick, KV9U

 Andrew O'Brien wrote:
  I wonder if we can get some general updates about the commercially
  available digital mode interfaces available today?   Microham,
  Rigblaster, and SignaLink are among the best known but I wonder what
  is available at the low end?  If a new ham wanted  a simple one, one
  that was well isolated and performed basic rig control only ( no
  internal soundcards, no Winkey chips, etc) , what is out there?  Is
  there anything under 40 Euros?  I'm happy with mine but I am a
little
  out of date on this topic.
 



Re: [digitalradio] Using the SpecJT to aide in tuning

2007-04-06 Thread w6ids

Well, all I can say is THANKS!, Andrew.  Your little blurb about
that Sync Tone did the trick. I was clueless about the real
relationship between SpecJT and WSJT displays. 

I was on 7076 when a signal came up.  I just clicked on what
appeared to be the Sync Tone in WSJT and Voila!  The slider
on SpecJT suddenly moved to the signal I was seeing and 
topped astride it. Up until then I wasn't printing anything - after
the slider moved, I printed a CQ and tried my hand at connecting
with the station as shown below - it worked:

022700  4   -3  0.2 -196  3 *  CQ W6SZ DM14  1   0 
022800  1  -30  0.1   40  5 *  
022900  6   -4  0.2 -196  3 *  CQ W6SZ DM14  1   0 
023100  7   -5  0.3 -196  3 *  CQ W6SZ DM14  1   0 
023300  5   -4  0.2 -196  3 *  CQ W6SZ DM14  1   0 
023500  6   -4 -0.9 -196  3 #  W6IDS W6SZ DM14 OOO   1   0 
023700 10   -5 -0.8 -196  3 #  W6IDS W6SZ DM14 OOO   1   0 
023900  9   -5 -0.8 -196  3 #  W6IDS W6SZ DM14 OOO   1   0 
024100 10  -16  -196  4   RO  ?
024300 10  -18  -196  4   RRR ?
024500 10   -8  -196  4   73  ?
024600  5  -2842  2   73  ?
024700  9   -3 -0.8 -196  3 *  TNX   1   0

Now, I have to admit I wasn't watching to see if everything lined up in
WSJT as you described.I was too excited.  All I did was click on
that large pulse.  After that contact, I found I was printing a whole
bunch more than in previous days of testing:

024900  6   -4 -0.80  3 *  CQ W6SZ DM14  1   0 
025000  2  -14 -0.5   24  3 *  HB9TLK K3UK FN02  1   0 
025100  7   -2 -0.90  3 *  CQ W6SZ DM14  1   0 
025200 10  -1824  4   RO  ?
025300 10  -14  -475  3   RRR ?
025400 10  -2025  5   RRR ?
025500 10  -10  -475  2   RRR ?
025600 10  -1925  0   73  ?
025700 10   -7  -475  4   73  ?
025800  0  -31 -1.5 -498  7
025900  4   -8 -1.9 -474  4 *  K3UK HB9TLK JN47  1   0 
03  0  -33 10.0 -388 41
030100  5  -13 -1.9 -474  4 *  K3UK HB9TLK JN47  1   0 
030200  0  -32  4.0 -719  2
030300  9  -12 -1.9 -474  4 *  CQ HB9TLK JN471   0 

Anyway, I broke the ice tonight.  Still a bunch to put together but
at least I accomplished something.  That was neat!

When making a contact, are we supposed to manually engage each of
the TX1 - TX6 message keys in the proper sequence, or does it all happen
automagically with the AUTO is ON engaged?  I turned the AUTO to off
during the exchanges because I noticed that I was going into transmit mode
before the DECODING was done and I could see his transmission.

Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN

- Original Message - 
From: Andrew O'Brien 
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 8:11 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Using the SpecJT to aide in tuning

I got a couple of useful tips today, played around a little and
thought I would pass a long some information to fellow JT65A rookies.

 SNIP  SNIP
Enter the SPECJT. I had no clue about this display other than it
looked cool. By it's self it appeared to do nothing. However if you
have SPECJT and the WJST waterfall on the screen at the same time, you
will notice SPECT responds to clicks on the WJTS mains screen
waterfall. I am told that a good precise frequency can be achieved
by sync'ing with the tones.

the sync tone would be at 0, and the three red lines will be in the
RO/RRR/73 positions...easy to decode even if timing off. The lowest
tone is always the sync tone, even when sending the SH messages 
(WD4KPD David)

  SNIP  SNIP
So, it seems that our goal should be to find the sync tone, align it
with the left most green line by clicking on in in the JT65A waterfall
and getting the RO/OOO stuff within the three RED lines on SPECJT.



Re: [digitalradio] Re: QSL for 7.076 JT65A QSO

2007-04-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Great work Ed !

On 4/6/07, KT2Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:






 Nice to work you Ed -- good luck with JT65 de KT2Q

   Tony
   Many tnx for being my 1st 40m JT65A QSO
   I was running 15w to indoor 20m dipole  
  
   7April 2007
   7.076
   023300  5  -13  0.6   -3  3 *  CQ KT2Q FN30
   1   0
   023500 16  -10  0.5   -3  3 *  CQ KT2Q FN30



Re: [digitalradio] Using the SpecJT to aide in tuning

2007-04-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien

Yeah , good news Howard.

Your question about manual transmit is an interesting one.  It appears to be
expected that one does it automatically, auto on , and you manually select
the message to send at each over.  However, I have the same problem as you,
the message is not decoded until its time for me to transmit automatically.
Supposedly, those with faster computer will get a full decode several
seconds before the top of the minute, but I do not.  So , on several
occasions I have manually responded because sometimes the person is not
coming back to me.  I select the message I am expecting to send, wait to see
what they sent and click on the message TX manually.  If I get it out
within  5-7 seconds after the minute, I don;t seem to have any problems.  An
alternative is to rely on the auto TX and let it transmit your next message,
and just stop TX if they are not coming back to you.  I have to scratch my
heard some more and think about this.  When I manually send,  the software
stops at the right time and then starts again immediately.  When that
happens, I don't worry, I just press the stop TX button quickly.

Andy K3UK


On 4/7/07, w6ids [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Well, all I can say is THANKS!, Andrew. Your little blurb about
that Sync Tone did the trick. I was clueless about the real
relationship between SpecJT and WSJT displays.

I was on 7076 when a signal came up. I just clicked on what
appeared to be the Sync Tone in WSJT and Voila! The slider
on SpecJT suddenly moved to the signal I was seeing and
topped astride it. Up until then I wasn't printing anything - after
the slider moved, I printed a CQ and tried my hand at connecting
with the station as shown below - it worked:

022700 4 -3 0.2 -196 3 * CQ W6SZ DM14 1 0
022800 1 -30 0.1 40 5 *
022900 6 -4 0.2 -196 3 * CQ W6SZ DM14 1 0
023100 7 -5 0.3 -196 3 * CQ W6SZ DM14 1 0
023300 5 -4 0.2 -196 3 * CQ W6SZ DM14 1 0
023500 6 -4 -0.9 -196 3 # W6IDS W6SZ DM14 OOO 1 0
023700 10 -5 -0.8 -196 3 # W6IDS W6SZ DM14 OOO 1 0
023900 9 -5 -0.8 -196 3 # W6IDS W6SZ DM14 OOO 1 0
024100 10 -16 -196 4 RO ?
024300 10 -18 -196 4 RRR ?
024500 10 -8 -196 4 73 ?
024600 5 -28 42 2 73 ?
024700 9 -3 -0.8 -196 3 * TNX 1 0

Now, I have to admit I wasn't watching to see if everything lined up in
WSJT as you described.I was too excited. All I did was click on
that large pulse. After that contact, I found I was printing a whole
bunch more than in previous days of testing:

024900 6 -4 -0.8 0 3 * CQ W6SZ DM14 1 0
025000 2 -14 -0.5 24 3 * HB9TLK K3UK FN02 1 0
025100 7 -2 -0.9 0 3 * CQ W6SZ DM14 1 0
025200 10 -18 24 4 RO ?
025300 10 -14 -475 3 RRR ?
025400 10 -20 25 5 RRR ?
025500 10 -10 -475 2 RRR ?
025600 10 -19 25 0 73 ?
025700 10 -7 -475 4 73 ?
025800 0 -31 -1.5 -498 7
025900 4 -8 -1.9 -474 4 * K3UK HB9TLK JN47 1 0
03 0 -33 10.0 -388 41
030100 5 -13 -1.9 -474 4 * K3UK HB9TLK JN47 1 0
030200 0 -32 4.0 -719 2
030300 9 -12 -1.9 -474 4 * CQ HB9TLK JN47 1 0

Anyway, I broke the ice tonight. Still a bunch to put together but
at least I accomplished something. That was neat!

When making a contact, are we supposed to manually engage each of
the TX1 - TX6 message keys in the proper sequence, or does it all happen
automagically with the AUTO is ON engaged? I turned the AUTO to off
during the exchanges because I noticed that I was going into transmit mode
before the DECODING was done and I could see his transmission.

Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN

- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 8:11 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Using the SpecJT to aide in tuning

I got a couple of useful tips today, played around a little and
thought I would pass a long some information to fellow JT65A rookies.

SNIP SNIP
Enter the SPECJT. I had no clue about this display other than it
looked cool. By it's self it appeared to do nothing. However if you
have SPECJT and the WJST waterfall on the screen at the same time, you
will notice SPECT responds to clicks on the WJTS mains screen
waterfall. I am told that a good precise frequency can be achieved
by sync'ing with the tones.

the sync tone would be at 0, and the three red lines will be in the
RO/RRR/73 positions...easy to decode even if timing off. The lowest
tone is always the sync tone, even when sending the SH messages
(WD4KPD David)

SNIP SNIP
So, it seems that our goal should be to find the sync tone, align it
with the left most green line by clicking on in in the JT65A waterfall
and getting the RO/OOO stuff within the three RED lines on SPECJT.

 





--
Andy K3UK
Skype Me :  callto://andyobrien73
www.obriensweb.com