Re: [steering-discuss] Re: trademark use request
Hello, thanks for all your feedback! So, the latest version of this would be LibreOffice and The Document Foundation are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy. Is this something legally agreeable and something we all can live with? If I hear no objections, I will modify the site footers accordingly in the next days. Florian -- Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[steering-discuss] on managing confcall rooms
Hello, since I'm not available for today's call (Christoph will step in), here's a short information on how to manage the room: - Someone needs to dial-in with the room number and the conference manager PIN to open up the room. It's room number and conference manager PIN as one number, followed by # - as usual - The first conference manager is then asked if the participants should be allowed to speak or not. 1 = not speaking, 3 = speaking. You want to press 3 to allow everyone to speak. :-) - *9 will lock the room, so no new parties can join, *7 will mute all participants. You don't need any of these. However, in case you are experiencing issues, like people unable to speak or join, press the according keys again to undo the function (e.g. *9 a second time will unlock the room again, *7 a second time will unmute everyone). Florian -- Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [QA] Opening a .doc file - Regression in Libreoffice 3.4 ???
Hi Gary, *, NoOp wrote (24-08-11 05:17) You've found YALOB (Yet Another LO Bug); of which there seem to more more of every day oddly enough with previous OOo files. And there will be more of them, no doubt. It was well known, and repeatedly written by OpenOffice.org developers, that fixing one bug would probably bring one or more others to the surface. One of the reasons that many especially older bugs remained untouched. Now that the LibreOffice developers actually took the challenge to start improving old structures, oddities, bugs in the code (to improve, make developing and building easier), it is unavoidable that there will emerge bugs, often previously hidden. So indeed there will be moments that an older version will be needed to open a document... On the other hand, as far as I see the challenge is taken seriously. See for example this issue: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39510 Fixing it asked for quite some research and discussion, but they did it. Thus, how nasty the very situation is: reporting these problems is important. I don't know if there already exists an issue for this specific problem. I hope to have more time to look at it later today. ANd if not, tomorrow afternoon. Regards, -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] how change macro security level?
Greetings, I find that I am unable to run macros: the dialog box presented by Tools Options LibreOffice Security offers a button labelled Macro Security..., and the button responds to a mouse click by showing itself depressed and taking focus, but that is all that happens. In particular, this does not call up the dialog box that I expected. Is there something I need to know about macro security? OTOH, am I alone in this situation? I am on ubuntu-natty (11.04), running a local build from master, commit id aa51fd4; my autogen options are ... --disable-mozilla --enable-symbols --enable-dbgutil --enable-crashdump --disable-build-mozilla --without-junit Thank you, all, for your attention. Terry. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] how change macro security level?
Hi Terry, Terrence Enger wrote (24-08-11 14:25) taking focus, but that is all that happens. In particular, this does not call up the dialog box that I expected. Is there something I need to know about macro security? OTOH, am I alone in this situation? I am on ubuntu-natty (11.04), running a local build from master, commit id aa51fd4; my autogen options are ... In the build from master (Build ID: 117281b-4eb4f62-260b7c1), on Ubuntu too, that I have, Macro security works fine. No idea if the problem is a local one (your build) an older or newer version than I have, or... In general, IMO if you build and test on the master, best for questions is IRC #libreoffice-dev. Cheers, -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] Advice
Hi...no problems...just asking for advice. I have been testing the beta builds of LO since it came out and use openSUSE as my main operating system. On my production machine, I have been using the Stable builds provided by the SUSE repository which has worked fine. If there any SUSE development people who monitor this list, I hope that they chime in. It seems as if the stable repository is ULTRA conservative...as I wait for updates to the latest stable branch, they are still pushing version 3.3.3. I have had no trouble at all with version 3.4.2. 3.4.3 is already in RC status... why the delay? So...my question is this: With absolutely no trouble using the vanilla builds...I am thinking of going to the LO vanilla latest stable builds. What advantages does the SUSE builds (on SUSE) have over the vanilla builds, if any? I am not too worried about desktop integration, as it seems as if the vanilla builds integrate and work fine (and look good too) Sorry if this is a bother and cluttering the list, but I just want some advice from those out there...and/or any word from the SUSE people what their master plan is with the stable repository. The UNSTABLE is still pushing 3.4.2 as if it's cutting edge...while 3.4.3 is already out there. Of course, on my production environment, I will be only using a stable build anyway...but I want to move forward faster than the SUSE repository is Thanks.. Bob -- Operating System: openSUSE Linux 11.4 64 bit Linux Kernel: 2.6.37.6 Desktop Environment: KDE 4.6.0 E-Mail Client: Thunderbird 6.0 Web Browser: Firefox 6.0 Office: LibreOffice 3.3.3 ClamAV 0.97.1 for UNIX -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Advice
Robert Boehm wrote: Hi...no problems...just asking for advice. I have been testing the beta builds of LO since it came out and use openSUSE as my main operating system. On my production machine, I have been using the Stable builds provided by the SUSE repository which has worked fine. If there any SUSE development people who monitor this list, I hope that they chime in. It seems as if the stable repository is ULTRA conservative...as I wait for updates to the latest stable branch, they are still pushing version 3.3.3. I have had no trouble at all with version 3.4.2. 3.4.3 is already in RC status... why the delay? So...my question is this: With absolutely no trouble using the vanilla builds...I am thinking of going to the LO vanilla latest stable builds. What advantages does the SUSE builds (on SUSE) have over the vanilla builds, if any? I am not too worried about desktop integration, as it seems as if the vanilla builds integrate and work fine (and look good too) Sorry if this is a bother and cluttering the list, but I just want some advice from those out there...and/or any word from the SUSE people what their master plan is with the stable repository. The UNSTABLE is still pushing 3.4.2 as if it's cutting edge...while 3.4.3 is already out there. Of course, on my production environment, I will be only using a stable build anyway...but I want to move forward faster than the SUSE repository is Thanks.. Bob Bob, You really need to be asking the SUSE people about this. Each distro has their own release requirements that the LibO devs have no control over. I know with Ubuntu unless there is a security problem that needs to be fixed they do not update till the next release. Andy -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Advice
On 08/24/2011 09:37 AM, Andy Brown wrote: Robert Boehm wrote: Hi...no problems...just asking for advice. I have been testing the beta builds of LO since it came out and use openSUSE as my main operating system. On my production machine, I have been using the Stable builds provided by the SUSE repository which has worked fine. If there any SUSE development people who monitor this list, I hope that they chime in. It seems as if the stable repository is ULTRA conservative...as I wait for updates to the latest stable branch, they are still pushing version 3.3.3. I have had no trouble at all with version 3.4.2. 3.4.3 is already in RC status... why the delay? So...my question is this: With absolutely no trouble using the vanilla builds...I am thinking of going to the LO vanilla latest stable builds. What advantages does the SUSE builds (on SUSE) have over the vanilla builds, if any? I am not too worried about desktop integration, as it seems as if the vanilla builds integrate and work fine (and look good too) Sorry if this is a bother and cluttering the list, but I just want some advice from those out there...and/or any word from the SUSE people what their master plan is with the stable repository. The UNSTABLE is still pushing 3.4.2 as if it's cutting edge...while 3.4.3 is already out there. Of course, on my production environment, I will be only using a stable build anyway...but I want to move forward faster than the SUSE repository is Thanks.. Bob Bob, You really need to be asking the SUSE people about this. Each distro has their own release requirements that the LibO devs have no control over. I know with Ubuntu unless there is a security problem that needs to be fixed they do not update till the next release. Andy Thanks, AndyI am going to the SUSE people too, but I just wanted some input from here. Seems as if they are NOT keeping up with the latest releases...for instance, the haven't even put up 3.3.4 yet...the super stable branch. Anywaythanks for your comment. Bob -- Operating System: openSUSE Linux 11.4 64 bit Linux Kernel: 2.6.37.6 Desktop Environment: KDE 4.6.0 E-Mail Client: Thunderbird 6.0 Web Browser: Firefox 6.0 Office: LibreOffice 3.3.3 ClamAV 0.97.1 for UNIX -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Advice
Thanks, AndyI am going to the SUSE people too, but I just wanted some input from here. Seems as if they are NOT keeping up with the latest releases...for instance, the haven't even put up 3.3.4 yet...the super stable branch. Anywaythanks for your comment. Bob Thanks bob, let us know if suse gives you some news, thanks, also me are using suse :-) -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Advice
On 25/08/11 12:50 AM, Robert Boehm wrote: Hi...no problems...just asking for advice. I have been testing the beta builds of LO since it came out and use openSUSE as my main operating system. On my production machine, I have been using the Stable builds provided by the SUSE repository which has worked fine. If there any SUSE development people who monitor this list, I hope that they chime in. It seems as if the stable repository is ULTRA conservative...as I wait for updates to the latest stable branch, they are still pushing version 3.3.3. I have had no trouble at all with version 3.4.2. 3.4.3 is already in RC status... why the delay? So...my question is this: With absolutely no trouble using the vanilla builds...I am thinking of going to the LO vanilla latest stable builds. What advantages does the SUSE builds (on SUSE) have over the vanilla builds, if any? I am not too worried about desktop integration, as it seems as if the vanilla builds integrate and work fine (and look good too) Sorry if this is a bother and cluttering the list, but I just want some advice from those out there...and/or any word from the SUSE people what their master plan is with the stable repository. The UNSTABLE is still pushing 3.4.2 as if it's cutting edge...while 3.4.3 is already out there. Of course, on my production environment, I will be only using a stable build anyway...but I want to move forward faster than the SUSE repository is Hi. I use 3.3.4 from the LO site on my Suse boxes in the office and have never had problems. On my laptop that is not essential I use 3.4.1 to follow the more advanced changes, generally without problem. I also have OOO3.2.1 on the office Suse boxes as sometimes I need to go backwards to open a document correctly. There were a couple of quirks I found to installing the LO RPMs on my Suse. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [QA] Opening a .doc file - Regression in Libreoffice 3.4 ???
2011/8/24 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net On 08/23/2011 01:47 PM, Sveinn í Felli wrote: Sorry if this is not the proper list to ask, but before filing a bug I'd like to know if someone has seen this before: The following .doc file does open correctly in OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 and OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 but neither in LibreOffice 3.4.2 nor in LibreOffice 3.4.3 OOO340m1 (Build:301) - tested on Debian and LinuxMint: http://www.tullverket.se/download/18.4ab1598c11632f3ba9280009674/enhetsdokument+anvands+vid+import+och+export+4+blad_tv718_3.doc Seems like a problem with lookup in many fields (Error: Source reference not found), also looks like cell formatting is separated onto another page than the form tables. Curiously in LibreOffice 3.4.3 OOO340m1 the file is always opened as read-only, no matter which permissions or filesystem is used. Of course this could simply be a corrupted file, still it opens correctly in OOo. Any ideas ? Regards, Sveinn í Felli Opens fine in OOo 3.2.1 (go-oo/Ubuntu version), OOo 3.3.0, and OOo-Dev 3.4.0 . Does *not* open properly in *any* LO versions that I currently have installed (3.3.3 and 3.4.2). You've found YALOB (Yet Another LO Bug); of which there seem to more more of every day oddly enough with previous OOo files. I see rapid regression with *every* new LO update and have actually started using older OOo go-oo packages for stability. Note to others who may think that I do not use or have installed LO: $ locate versionrc /opt/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/versionrc /opt/libreoffice/program/versionrc /opt/libreoffice/ure/bin/versionrc /opt/libreoffice3.4/basis3.4/program/versionrc /opt/libreoffice3.4/program/versionrc /opt/libreoffice3.4/ure/bin/versionrc /opt/ooo-dev/basis3.4/program/versionrc /opt/ooo-dev/ure/bin/versionrc /opt/ooo-dev3/program/versionrc /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.3/program/versionrc /opt/openoffice.org/ure/bin/versionrc /opt/openoffice.org3/program/versionrchttp://openoffice.org/ure/bin/versionrc%0A/opt/openoffice.org3/program/versionrc /usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.2/program/versionrc /usr/lib/openoffice/program/versionrc /usr/lib/ure/bin/versionrc and I have LO installed for testing on Ubuntu 11.04 and 11.10. As a follow up to NoOp's comment above, I can here mention that on my build - LibreOffice 3.3.3 (OOO330m19 (Build:301) libreoffice-3.3.3.1, Ubuntu package 1:3.3.3-1ubuntu2) - on 64-bit Ubuntu 11.04, this EU customs document opens in highly distorted form : no text in some fields/pages, pages come in erroneous order, and in many fields, the following text appears : «Fel: Det gick inte att hitta referenskällan», which, for the sake of both importers and exporters, I hope does not appear on the original form Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
