Re: [jQuery] make a div disappear after 2seconds?
ronaldo wrote:
>
> should be a simple question but its been doing my heading for 1 day now!!
> how can i make a div disappear after 2 seconds ?
Why not just:
setTimeout(function() { $(div).hide() }, 2000);
-- Dossy
--
Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/
Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/
"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] jQuery in server side language?
On 2007.02.24, howard chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone think that it would be great to use jQuery in server side? > > such as grab html from remote server, and process the html elements > using jQuery, > > any idea? It's my current goal with AOLserver's nsjsapi module, to get it to the point where I can use jQuery server-side in AOLserver. So, there's at least one person who thinks it would be great. :-) -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Google group email problem
On 2007.03.23, Janet Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I joined the group but I can't set the email option for indivdual > emails. Does anyone else have this problem? I have the same problem--I thought it was just me. Glad to hear I'm not the only one. Is this a problem with the group's settings ... or something else? -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] In-situ editing (Editable, etc.) disturbs layout
Hi,
I'm trying to use jQuery and the Editable plugin to implement in-situ
editing (ala Flickr) and it disturbs the layout, which I don't quite
understand.
I have something like this:
Some label: Some text
... some other text.
I set up the span as editable:
$(document).ready(function() {
$("#editme").editable("foo.adp");
});
On load, it renders like this:
Some label: some text ... some other text.
Once I click to edit, it renders like this:
Some label: [Some text.]
... some other text.
Once I submit, it renders like this:
Some label: Some text.
... some other text.
What gives? The span is "display: inline" so once submitted, it should
render as it did originally, all on the same line. It looks as though
the span is getting changed to "display: block" and/or a is being
inserted, or something.
Aha ... Editable creates a new ... which IIRC is "display: block"
... and Editable doesn't cleanup/destroy the on submit/reset.
The short-term work-around I found to this is to add this to my CSS:
#editme form { display: inline; }
But, this isn't the whole solution. Since Editable seems to repeatedly
create these DOM objects but never clean then up ... this would be a
source for a memory-leak in a long-lived web application, no?
-- Dossy
--
Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/
Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/
"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Naming plugin files
On 2006.08.15, Dylan Verheul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > They don't line up nicely with jquery.js :-) > > On 8/15/06, Dimitar Spassov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What about these names: > > > > > So editable would be in jquery.editable.js, DOM would be in jquery.dom.js. > > jq.editable.js, DOM would be in jq.dom.js. I've named mine "jquery-editable.js" ... FWIW. -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] In-situ editing (Editable, etc.) disturbs layout
On 2006.08.15, Jonathan Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I'll look into the memory leakage part, but I've never really noticed it > >myself. > > I doubt it would be a memory leak since the form is part of the dom. All it > does is leave around some extra elements. In short it should clean up what > it alters. Yes, but every time the click handler is fired, it creates a new "form" and "input" node ... and never removes them. Imagine a web application where the page is long-living (which is reasonable given AJAX). What will happen to the DOM tree? It'll continue to accumulate "form" and "input" nodes each time the click handler is fired. Or, am I missing something here? Do the form/input nodes get removed and I just can't tell? If so: why does the edited element stay rendered the way it is? From my empirical tests, it seems that the "form" node continues to exist after the submit/reset of the in-situ editing is performed. -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] filter() on attributes?
Hi,
I don't want to assign an id attribute to all my fields, but
instead want to do something like this:
Then, get the value with something like:
$("#foo input[name=bar]").val();
That didn't work. So, I tried:
$("#foo input").filter("[name=bar]").val();
That didn't work either. I'm thinking I might have to use $.grep() but
I can't seem to get it to work:
$.grep($("#foo input"), function(a, i) { return (a[i].attr("name") ==
"bar"); })[0].val();
That one causes a JS error complaining that "a[i] has no properties."
The filter() docs say I should be able to use an XPath expression ...
so, this should work:
$("#foo input").filter("/[name=bar]").val();
Aha! It does. Is this the best way of doing this? Are there any
pitfalls I need to worry about? Can I collapse this into a more concise
form?
-- Dossy
--
Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/
Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/
"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] filter() on attributes?
On 2006.09.05, Sam Collett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 05/09/06, Dossy Shiobara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > $("#foo input").filter("/[name=bar]").val();
>
> I use:
> $("#foo [EMAIL PROTECTED]").val();
>
> i.e. put @ before the attribute you want.
*facepalm* Ah, yes. Duh. Thanks!
-- Dossy
--
Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/
Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/
"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Client-side query term highlighting demo using jQuery
Client-side query term highlighting demo using jQuery
http://dossy.org/referer-demo.html
Here's a quick client-side query term highlighting demo that uses jQuery
to parse the document.referrer and walks the DOM to highlight text by
wrapping it in a with the class "qterm".
Thanks, John, for pointing out that I can recursively walk the DOM with
$("body *") ... that hit the spot.
Here's the code:
.qterm { color: #444; background-color: #ee9; font-weight: bold; }
a span.qterm { color: #00f; text-decoration: underline; }
a:hover span.qterm { color: #666; }
$(document).ready(function() {
if (!document.referrer) return;
var matches = document.referrer.match(/[?&]q=([^&]*)/);
if (!matches) return;
var terms = unescape(matches[1].replace(/\+/g, ' '));
var re = new RegExp().compile('(' + terms + ')', 'i');
$("body *").each(function() {
if ($(this).children().size() > 0) return;
if ($(this).is("xmp, pre")) return;
var html = $(this).html();
var newhtml = html.replace(re, '<span class="qterm">$1</span>');
$(this).html(newhtml);
});
});
Naturally, my parsing of document.referrer is *very* naive. Naturally,
adding the appropriate expressions to match more than just Google (or
any search engine that uses the "q=terms" form) is probably necessary.
I leave that up to you folks to help fill that part in. :-)
-- Dossy
--
Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/
Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/
"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Client-side query term highlighting demo using jQuery
On 2006.09.11, Matt Stith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Great job! Personally, i would check if document.location has a 'q' > set, and if not, use the referrer, That would make it a little more > usable. More usable how? The idea behind this code snippet is to highlight search query terms on click-through from a SERP. The SERP's URL is what we have in document.referrer, not document.location. -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] inside A
On 2006.09.12, Stamen Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forgive me my stupid question... but is there an easy way to turn this:
>
> some text
>
> into this:
>
> some text
>
> It's some kind of wrap... but from the inside :-)
I'm assuming you want to inject the div for a reason OTHER than to add
the class?
If not, why not just $("[EMAIL PROTECTED]'#']").addClass("someclass") ... right?
To do what you're looking for, my first attempt would be:
var elem = $("[EMAIL PROTECTED]'#']");
elem.html('' + elem.html() + '');
-- Dossy
--
Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/
Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/
"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] .each backwards ?
On 2006.10.06, Blair Mitchelmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose hcae: Oh, god no. I see the smiley so I'm guessing you're only kidding, but before someone goes "yeah, that's a good idea ..." > kenton.simpson wrote: > > Is there a way to make .each walk backwards threw the element collection? I'm surprised there's no .reverse(). i.e.: $(collection).reverse().each(...) -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] attach a click event to everything but one TR element...??
On 2006.10.14, Miel Soeterbroek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And finally, one more thing:
> Can the CSS/XPath expression be dynamic, ie:
>
> function fillEditField(fieldname,value) {
>var fieldIdAttr = 'edit_' + fieldname;
>$("input#"+fieldIdAttr).val(value);
> }
Don't use underscores in element IDs. It's not a valid character, and
some browsers (like, MSIE) will not do what you want if you use it.
http://devedge-temp.mozilla.org/viewsource/2001/css-underscores/
Use hyphens, if you insist on using a visual separator.
-- Dossy
--
Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/
Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/
"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Groups, Forums
On 2006.10.16, Glen Lipka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think this is John's call ultimately, but what do you all think? > Would a more robust group site be helpful or get in the way? It would get in the way. Use a real mail client that supports threading, already. It's 2006, you know. Now, if only people would allow you to download a forum's messages in Unix mbox format (so I could open/search/etc. it locally using my threading mail client!) ... most web-based forum GUIs are horrible. A soft compromise might be an NNTP newsgroup, but I like the push-style nature of email-based lists. I hate to poll for new articles. -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] jQuery Bug #262: "name.replace is not a function" in 1.0.3
http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/262/ I re-opened this bug (it was closed) as I'm now running into this error. Can some more folks take a look at this and see if there's any kind of work-around, even? Is there anything that can be done if another JS script extends the Object object in a foolish way? -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
