Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] 2011 Charter Member Election Results

2011-12-02 Thread Landon Blake
I would think it appropriate to send an e-mail to people that will be
retired as a charter member before they are removed. To be fair, they
should've been warned they were on the list to be axed before the
vote. (Maybe they already were?)

I'm not trying to excuse anyone's lack of involvement, but I think it
is important to remember that we are all busy and we don't want to
take ourselves to seriously.

Landon

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:33 AM, George R. C. Silva
georger.si...@gmail.com wrote:
 Em quarta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2011 04:19:55, Venkatesh Raghavan
 escreveu:

 Daniel and All,

 Thanks for you hard work as CRO, Daniel.
 Could you also let us know what was the
 percentage of voting.

 My congratulations to all the new Charter Members
 and many thanks for all nominees for their
 participation.

 May be time to find out charter members who have abstained
 for Charter Member elections over the last two elections
 and consider a retirement policy for Charter Members.

 Best

 Venka

 On 2011/11/30 14:17, Daniel Morissette wrote:

 OSGeo Community,

 I am ready to announce the results of the 2011 Charter Member Election.

 • Note that we had a tie for the 20th slot, so I decided to welcome 21
 new charter members for this year instead of 20 since that still fits within
 the limits of 20% new charter members set by the board at the 2011-09-17
 board meeting (i.e. 20% of 104 = 20.8)

 • The new charter members for 2011 are (in alphabetical order):
 • Bob Basques
 • Brian Case
 • Eric Lemoine
 • Even Rouault
 • G.Hanumantha Rao
 • Gabriel Roldán
 • Jachym Cepicky
 • Lluís Vicens
 • Luca Delucchi
 • Maning Sambale
 • Margherita Di Leo
 • Martin Daly
 • Martin Landa
 • Massimo Di Stefano
 • Nicolas Bozon
 • Sanghee Shin
 • Stephen Woodbridge
 • Suchith Anand
 • Tim Sutton
 • Xianfeng Song
 • Yoicihi Kayama

 Those results are published in the wiki at
 http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Election_2011#Final_Status:_2011-11-29

 I will leave it up to our board secretary to update the official members
 database and we the official list on the website should also be updated soon
 (http://www.osgeo.org/charter_members)

 A warm welcome to our new charter members, and thank you to all
 candidates who didn't make it… it was a matter of only a few votes, so maybe
 next year?

 Daniel Morissette (OSGeo CRO, 2011)

 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



 Congratulations to all new charter members!

 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] 2011 Charter Member Election Results

2011-12-02 Thread Dave McIlhagga
I would suggest that on the contrary, being a Charter Member does come with 
responsibility -- it may be minimal but is critically important. All that is 
required is voting for new Charter Members and voting for the Board.

Assuming, reasonable efforts have been made to be in touch with Charter 
Members, I think it's actually important to purge those who don't take this 
responsibility seriously. I would suggest it's a necessary part of preserving 
the integrity of the organization.

Keep in mind, for many OSGeo is not just a past-time - it's a vested part of 
our institutions, businesses, and people.

Dave


On 2011-12-02, at 11:23 AM, Landon Blake wrote:

 I would think it appropriate to send an e-mail to people that will be
 retired as a charter member before they are removed. To be fair, they
 should've been warned they were on the list to be axed before the
 vote. (Maybe they already were?)
 
 I'm not trying to excuse anyone's lack of involvement, but I think it
 is important to remember that we are all busy and we don't want to
 take ourselves to seriously.
 
 Landon
 
 On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:33 AM, George R. C. Silva
 georger.si...@gmail.com wrote:
 Em quarta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2011 04:19:55, Venkatesh Raghavan
 escreveu:
 
 Daniel and All,
 
 Thanks for you hard work as CRO, Daniel.
 Could you also let us know what was the
 percentage of voting.
 
 My congratulations to all the new Charter Members
 and many thanks for all nominees for their
 participation.
 
 May be time to find out charter members who have abstained
 for Charter Member elections over the last two elections
 and consider a retirement policy for Charter Members.
 
 Best
 
 Venka
 
 On 2011/11/30 14:17, Daniel Morissette wrote:
 
 OSGeo Community,
 
 I am ready to announce the results of the 2011 Charter Member Election.
 
 • Note that we had a tie for the 20th slot, so I decided to welcome 21
 new charter members for this year instead of 20 since that still fits 
 within
 the limits of 20% new charter members set by the board at the 2011-09-17
 board meeting (i.e. 20% of 104 = 20.8)
 
 • The new charter members for 2011 are (in alphabetical order):
 • Bob Basques
 • Brian Case
 • Eric Lemoine
 • Even Rouault
 • G.Hanumantha Rao
 • Gabriel Roldán
 • Jachym Cepicky
 • Lluís Vicens
 • Luca Delucchi
 • Maning Sambale
 • Margherita Di Leo
 • Martin Daly
 • Martin Landa
 • Massimo Di Stefano
 • Nicolas Bozon
 • Sanghee Shin
 • Stephen Woodbridge
 • Suchith Anand
 • Tim Sutton
 • Xianfeng Song
 • Yoicihi Kayama
 
 Those results are published in the wiki at
 http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Election_2011#Final_Status:_2011-11-29
 
 I will leave it up to our board secretary to update the official members
 database and we the official list on the website should also be updated 
 soon
 (http://www.osgeo.org/charter_members)
 
 A warm welcome to our new charter members, and thank you to all
 candidates who didn't make it… it was a matter of only a few votes, so 
 maybe
 next year?
 
 Daniel Morissette (OSGeo CRO, 2011)
 
 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
 
 
 
 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
 
 
 
 Congratulations to all new charter members!
 
 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] 2011 Charter Member Election Results

2011-12-02 Thread Puneet Kishor

On Dec 2, 2011, at 10:30 AM, Dave McIlhagga wrote:

 I would suggest that on the contrary, being a Charter Member does come with 
 responsibility -- it may be minimal but is critically important. All that is 
 required is voting for new Charter Members and voting for the Board.
 ..

I agree with Dave. There is really not much that I do as a Charter Member that 
I couldn't do as joe-schmoe-at-large, and since voting is the only thing that I 
can do as a Charter Member, I better do that little bit with a sense of 
responsibility... else, dismantle the whole Charter Member thing and let's 
just get back to doing what we do as ordinary folks. And, in the end, all that 
matters is what we do. That merits saying again -- 

being a Charter Member is no bees-knees. Anyone who is *not* a Charter Member 
is just as equally valuable as anyone who is one. In the end, all that matters 
is what we contribute to the cause through our actions no matter what 
position we hold, even if it is no position at all.

--
Puneet Kishor___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[OSGeo-Discuss] Total Open Station 0.3 released!

2011-12-02 Thread Stefano Costa
Total Open Station 0.3 was released today!

What is Total Open Station?
Total Open Station (TOPS for friends) is a free software program for
downloading and processing data from total station devices.

If you don't know what a total station is, please read
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_station to get an idea.

The task of managing survey data is usually done by proprietary, dedicated and
Windows™-only software, but TOPS is different by nature, because:

  * it is free software released under the GNU GPLv3 license;
  * it works on any operating system, including some mobile platforms
(OpenMoko);
  * it is designed to support as many devices and formats as
possible, all within the same program, opposed to having one
program per device.

Total Open Station is available as a Python source install for GNU/Linux and
other UNIX systems (possibly including Mac OSX, feedback welcome), and
as a binary installer for Microsoft Windows. Downloads and install
instructions at http://tops.iosa.it/installing.html

TOPS 0.3 is our first official release, and already has support for
different input formats (there are lots of them out there). More formats
will be supported in next releases, and user feedback is essential.

Total Open Station is developed within the IOSA Project, and is written
in Python. The website and documentation is at http://tops.iosa.it/ if
you want to find out how to contribute or read more detailed
documentation.

Ciao,
Stefano



___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[OSGeo-Discuss] RE: Open Source track for Geospatial World Forum 2012

2011-12-02 Thread Cameron Shorter

osgeo-discuss,

Are there any OSGeo types heading to Geospatial World Forum? If so, 
would you be interested in manning an OSGeo booth if we were able to 
secure one? If we can get a few interested people, then we could 
approach the organisors to see if they can organise a booth for us.


On 3/12/2011 2:44 AM, megha datta wrote:

Dear Cameron,
Apologies for the late response, as I was in midst of many things.
What I understood from your previous email is that you would supply us 
the DVDs, which we need to distribute to all delegates through the 
literature kit. We would not be able to coordinate and sponsor the 
printing the DVD. In case you plan to purchase a booth space at the 
conference, which I can help you with, then you can use that space to 
distribute the DVD.
Feel free to revert to me in case of any queries or concerns. I will 
be pleased to assist you.

Kind regards,
Megha


-Original Message-
From: Cameron Shorter cameron.shor...@gmail.com
To: Megha Datta megha.da...@gisdevelopment.net
Cc: 'Seven (aka Arnulf)' se...@arnulf.us,  'Annu Negi'
annu.n...@gisdevelopment.net, 'conference'
conference_...@lists.osgeo.org,  'Aditya Chopra'
aditya.cho...@gisdevelopment.net, 'marketing'
market...@lists.osgeo.org
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:02:41 +1100
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Conf] Re: [Board] Fwd: RE: Open Source track
for Geospatial World Forum 2012

Megha,
What we can commit to is creating an ISO image for the DVD, which
is up
to date, and of excellent quality (being developed by close to 100
volunteers).

What we would expect from the conference is:
* Someone on the ground who can coordinate printing and delivery of
DVDs. (We can tell you how).
* Budget to cover the print costs, at ~ $2 per DVD (depending on
size of
print run). This is usually factored into the conference budget costs.
* Is this something that you can help coordinate?
* You also have the option of handing out the DVD to all
delegates, or
handing them out from an OSGeo booth or similar. (These DVDs are
usually
the most sought after item from the OSGeo booths that I have
manned in
the past).

On 22/11/2011 5:10 PM, Megha Datta wrote:
 Dear Cameron,

 We welcome the idea of having a DVD of 50 Open Source software's
in GWF
 delegate kit. I will send you details of the address you need to
send the
 DVDs to at a later date.

 Regards,
 Megha

 -Original Message-
 From: Cameron Shorter [mailto:cameron.shor...@gmail.com]
 Sent: 20 November 2011 05:12
 To: Seven (aka Arnulf)
 Cc: Megha Datta; 'Annu Negi'; conference; 'Aditya Chopra'; marketing
 Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Conf] Re: [Board] Fwd: RE: Open Source track for
 Geospatial World Forum 2012

 Hello Megha,
 I strongly encourage you to consider incorporating the
OSGeo-Live DVD
 [1] into your conference. The DVD contains close to 50
Geospatial Open
 Source packages, pre-installed and ready to run with test data,
along
 with consistent 1 page project overviews and quickstarts.

 Many spatial conferences and workshops hand out this DVD (or
USB) to all
 attendees. Maybe you would like to do the same? We also have a
 presentation of all these applications which can be used as a
basis for
 a high level overview of the breadth of available Geospatial Open
 Source. [2]

 Is this of interest?

 [1] http://live.osgeo.org
 [2] https://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/livedvd/promo/trunk/en/presentation/

 On 18/11/2011 4:00 AM, Seven (aka Arnulf) wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Dear Megha,
 yes, please include OSGeo as a seminar partner. We will make
sure that
 it will be announced on our mailing list once we have a link to
point
 to. Can you please give us a link to your identification, logo,
etc.?

 Please use this OSGeo logo:
 http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Logo

 Also available in vector format:


http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/browser/marketing/logo/svg/OSGeo_logo.svg?format

 =raw
 I am not sure whether we will be able to substantially help you in
 organizing the papers, this depends a lot on how many we
receive. In
 general we do this via an online voting system where all
abstracts are
 open for public scrutiny and people can allocate points for
their level
 of interrest. After this pre-sorting a program committee looks
into the
 submissions and organizes them into a coherent list. I am
forwarding
 this both to the OSGeo Conference and Education committees -
maybe this
 is an action that might get them interested.

 During the last board meeting it was decided that I should be your
 primary contact and will then include whoever else might be
helpful.
 

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open Source Post-process DGPS software?

2011-12-02 Thread Tyler Mitchell
There is also a group of GPS pros over on the foss-gps list:
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/  in case you still need a hand :)

- Original message -
 On 12/02/2011 12:58 PM, Charles Schweik wrote:
  Hi all,
  
  Is there any open source software to do post-process differential
  correction of GPS data, similar to Trimble's Pathfinder software?
  
  Thanks in advance,
  
  Charlie Schweik
 
 http://www.rtklib.com/
 
 But if you're using Trimble's you first have to find a way to convert
 ssf files to Rinex.
 
 Enjoy,
 Alex
 
 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open Source Post-process DGPS software?

2011-12-02 Thread nicolas bozon
Hello Charles,

There is also the GoGPS software available for open source differential
correction of GPS data.
It was origanaly developed in MATLAB, and then ported to Java.
By the way, it can also be WPS enabled using the ZOO-Project server.

It is available on sourceforge here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gogps/develop

They also have a website, but down for maintenance at the moment (some more
info  docs available there)
www.gogps-project.org

Best,

Nick


2011/12/2 Tyler Mitchell tmitch...@osgeo.org

 **

 There is also a group of GPS pros over on the foss-gps list:
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ in case you still need a hand :)

 - Original message -
  On 12/02/2011 12:58 PM, Charles Schweik wrote:
   Hi all,
  
   Is there any open source software to do post-process differential
   correction of GPS data, similar to Trimble's Pathfinder software?
  
   Thanks in advance,
  
   Charlie Schweik
 
  http://www.rtklib.com/
 
  But if you're using Trimble's you first have to find a way to convert
  ssf files to Rinex.
 
  Enjoy,
  Alex
 
  ___
  Discuss mailing list
  Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
  http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] 2011 Charter Member Election Results

2011-12-02 Thread Michael P. Gerlek
Nicolas:

 

This is a great idea.  Could you please start by stubbing out a wiki page for 
this, and then others can add onto it?

 

-mpg

 

 

 

From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] 
On Behalf Of nicolas bozon
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 6:56 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] 2011 Charter Member Election Results

 

Hello all,

As a fresh new charter member, i was precisely wondering if some guidelines for 
charter membership were available somewhere. I was about to ask in fact, when 
this thread came up.
I knew that voting was one of the duties, but thought that some others may 
exist.
According to me, charter members should also dynamise and promote their 
respective (and/or prefered) local chapter as much as possible.
That would be nice if some experienced charter members could start such 
guidelines on the wiki or elsewhere where a kind of brainstorming  could occur 
on that topic.
My 2 cents
Thanks

Nick

2011/12/3 Mateusz Łoskot mate...@loskot.net

On 2 December 2011 16:30, Dave McIlhagga dmcilha...@dmsolutions.ca wrote:
 I would suggest that on the contrary, being a Charter Member does come with
 responsibility -- it may be minimal but is critically important. All that is 
 required is
voting for new Charter Members and voting for the Board.

 Assuming, reasonable efforts have been made to be in touch with Charter 
 Members,
 I think it's actually important to purge those who don't take this 
 responsibility
seriously. I would suggest it's a necessary part of preserving the integrity 
of the organization.

 Keep in mind, for many OSGeo is not just a past-time - it's a vested
 part of our institutions, businesses, and people.

I support Dave's opinion here.

OSGeo has no resources for mothering its Charter Members.

Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Member of ACCU, http://accu.org

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

 

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] 2011 Charter Member Election Results

2011-12-02 Thread nicolas bozon
Michael, all

Done -
The page was created here:
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_charter_member_page_instruction

Thanks to all experienced members to add their thoughts there !

Best,

Nick

2011/12/3 Michael P. Gerlek m...@flaxen.com

 Nicolas:

 ** **

 This is a great idea.  Could you please start by stubbing out a wiki page
 for this, and then others can add onto it?

 ** **

 -mpg

 ** **

 ** **

 ** **

 *From:* discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:
 discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *nicolas bozon
 *Sent:* Friday, December 02, 2011 6:56 PM
 *To:* OSGeo Discussions
 *Subject:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] 2011 Charter Member Election Results

 ** **

 Hello all,

 As a fresh new charter member, i was precisely wondering if some
 guidelines for charter membership were available somewhere. I was about to
 ask in fact, when this thread came up.
 I knew that voting was one of the duties, but thought that some others may
 exist.
 According to me, charter members should also dynamise and promote their
 respective (and/or prefered) local chapter as much as possible.
 That would be nice if some experienced charter members could start such
 guidelines on the wiki or elsewhere where a kind of brainstorming  could
 occur on that topic.
 My 2 cents
 Thanks

 Nick

 2011/12/3 Mateusz Łoskot mate...@loskot.net

 On 2 December 2011 16:30, Dave McIlhagga dmcilha...@dmsolutions.ca
 wrote:
  I would suggest that on the contrary, being a Charter Member does come
 with
  responsibility -- it may be minimal but is critically important. All
 that is required is
 voting for new Charter Members and voting for the Board.
 
  Assuming, reasonable efforts have been made to be in touch with Charter
 Members,
  I think it's actually important to purge those who don't take this
 responsibility
 seriously. I would suggest it's a necessary part of preserving the
 integrity of the organization.
 
  Keep in mind, for many OSGeo is not just a past-time - it's a vested
  part of our institutions, businesses, and people.

 I support Dave's opinion here.

 OSGeo has no resources for mothering its Charter Members.

 Best regards,
 --
 Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
 Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
 Member of ACCU, http://accu.org

 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

 ** **

 ___
 Discuss mailing list
 Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss