Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] GDAL and Java on Windows (and FileGDB too)
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 6:43 PM Even Rouault wrote: > Not sure if that would solve your issues though. > Yes sir, it does! Thank you! Now, if only there was a handy installer for this stuff too! :-p Cheers Andrea -- Regards, Andrea Aime == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- *Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail.* ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] How to retire membership status?
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:51 AM, María Arias de Reyna wrote: > I think this email, cited by Sara Safavi, from Marc Vloemans [1] is just >> unbelievable and thus unacceptable to this community. >> > Personally I agree with you that it was an uncomfortable situation easy to > misinterpret. I wasn't comfortable either reading it. (me, the person, not > the board) > Agreed, I was neither. > The thing is, we still have this "assume good intent" clause on the CoC > that makes it kind of useless on the gray area. > I would suggest revising the CoC then, otherwise all the talk about supporting diversity is kind of done in vain imho Cheers Andrea ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G 2018 sponsorship
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 3:54 PM, Dan Little <theduckylit...@gmail.com> wrote: > You are the only one, and serving a very limited perspective. > I also feel a bit uncomfortable having ESRI sponsor the conference, but I can see the other side as well. You should probably run statistics before stating something as harshly as you did, that's not the OSGeo way. Regards Andrea == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003. The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Costly FOSS4Gs
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bruce Bannerman < bruce.bannerman.os...@gmail.com> wrote: > When you look at the costs associated with a person attending a typical > international FOSS4G event, the actual conference fees a small amount of > the actual cost. > > Consider airfares, transportation, accomodation, meals, lost wages etc. > There is nothing that an LOC can do about these individual costs. > Ah hem, nothing that the LOC can do once the conference site is chosen, but something that OSGeo can do when assigning the location and timing. And I believe that is happening, if I'm not wrong for the first time the LOC needs to provide expected cost of airfare and accommodation as part of their proposal, which will make people consider carefully that aspect too. Another aspect that was not cited but that I heard in conversations and believe is important, it's that it is really hard to compress the cost of a large conference: the LOC needs a place that can host 1000 people, and that can give internet to this many people, that places forces the catering package on you (I've been told by several conference chairs there no way to dodge that) and the two together make up for a large amount of the cost. So, besides some exceptions (think FOSDEM) it seems the only way to setup a cheaper conference is to make a smaller one that can be hosted at a university or in a smaller conference center. Hence the focus on the local conferences. I believe the threshold is at around 500 people, larger than that one is hung on the costly options. Cheers Andrea == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003. The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Polimi <maria.brove...@polimi.it> wrote: > 1) in my opinion the size matters and it is not in se something negative > to be a small startup or company instead of a big one. Anyway, as JeffJ > said, if somebody is alienated we can skip it. We have just to better > discuss this 'if'. > Just sharing my two cents... >From a project/community standpoint one wants to put front and center the people, companies and organizations that are the lifeblood of the community, those that are contributing code, documentation, advocating and helping users. Personally I'd keep it as a primary classifier, failing to do so might divert financial resources from the parts of the community that deserve and need it the most. >From the standpoint of an organization looking for a provider, size may also be important, a larger company typically has a better financial footing (mandatory in certain types of contracts), and possibly a more diversified experience among its ranks. Also, it might happen that the customer is looking for a certain experience with the provider (e.g, matching or getting closer to its own size, or looking for the more industrial vs the more "boutique" approach). So... what about reporting the size of the company among the other information, even if it is not the primary classifier? The size could be reported as classes to lessen the chore of maintaing such information (e.g, "1-5", "5-20", "20-50", "50+", just thinking out loud here) Cheers Andrea == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003. The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Where to hire a FOSS4G freelane developer?
Some projects also keep an up to date list of commercial providers, for example: http://geoserver.org/support/ https://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/commercial_support.html Cheers Andrea On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Luigi Pirelli <lui...@gmail.com> wrote: > job list is a good start point but it does not cove many osgeo devs... > I would suggest to ask directly in the dev list of the project touched > by your requirements. the CV is usually the commit history or dev list > activity. > > regards > Luigi Pirelli > > > ** > * Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com > * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli > * Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli > * GitHub: https://github.com/luipir > * Mastering QGIS 2nd Edition: > * https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business- > intelligence/mastering-qgis-second-edition > > ** > > > On 11 May 2017 at 14:57, Jeff McKenna <jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com> > wrote: > > Luís another good resource is the OSGeo "jobs" mailing list, where > > opportunities are posted: subscribe at > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/jobs > > > > -jeff > > > > > > -- > > Jeff McKenna > > President Emeritus, OSGeo Foundation > > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Jeff_McKenna > > > > > > > > > > On 2017-05-11 9:35 AM, Luís Moreira de Sousa wrote: > >> > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> Is there any resource within the OSGeo cosmos to help hiring freelance > >> developers from our community? For instance, an index of folk certified > >> by Arnulf? > >> > >> A quick web search only comes up with general freelance websites. > >> > >> Thank you. > >> > >> -- > >> Luís Moreira de Sousa > >> Im Grund 6 > >> CH-8600 Dübendorf > >> Switzerland > >> > >> Phone: +41 (0)79 812 62 65 > >> Email: luis.de.so...@protonmail.ch <mailto:luis.de.so...@protonmail.ch> > >> URL: https://sites.google.com/site/luismoreiradesousa > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > Discuss mailing list > > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003. The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc. --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Edu] Web cartography, SLD
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Olivier Ertz <olivier.e...@heig-vd.ch> wrote: > Right! seems the link to my old sample data is missing. I will try to find > them back and tell you. > > Yep, would be interesting to test with the latest GeoServer. > > Especially I remember that I had some difficulties to use the MarkIndex > capability of SE with deegree3 (see discussion http://osgeo-org.1560.x6. > nabble.com/SE-Styling-MarkIndex-glyph-index-td5022210.html). No idea how > GeoServer does implement what the SE spec describes about this MarkIndex > (at the time of writing the tutorial, I finally decided to remove the > Markindex example from it). > MarkIndex was indeed not implemented until a few months ago. It is right now implemented only for TTF fonts, in order to support QGIS font based symbols export (I believe you'll find it in 2.10.x, but I'm not 100% sure, going by memory here). The specification does not really say which symbol sets should support markIndex, or does it? All I can find is: "The alternative to a WellKnownName is an external mark format. The MarkIndex allows an individual mark in a mark archive to be selected. An example format for an external mark achive would be a TrueType font file, with MarkIndex being used to select an individual glyph from that file." Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003. The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc. --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Edu] Web cartography, SLD
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Olivier Ertz <olivier.e...@heig-vd.ch> wrote: > Like GeoServer, deegree3 is a WMS/SLD OGC reference implementation, but in > 2013, it was also compliant with Symbology Encoding 1.1 (SE) which is part > of the replacement of the deprecated SLD 1.0. Moreover SE1.1 does offer few > new capabilities, especially transformation functions (interpolate, recode, > categorize). > GeoServer also provides incomplete support for SE 1.1, and full support for the transformation functions, but they are so seldomly used in combination that I cannot be sure they would be handled properly. I was hoping to find an example ready to customize in the tutorial you're linking, but could not see it (I could also not find a full style to just cut/paste, is it by any chance available along with the sample data? I'd be curious to try that map out on a recent GeoServer). The main missing point in GeoServer SE support is raster symbolizer, the vector symbolization should mostly work. Hopefully it's going to get better with the interest the user community is showing for style export between QGIS and GeoServer (and for once, that will make for a use case meant for SE/SLD, that is, machine generation of the styles as opposed to manual editing). Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003. The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc. --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2016] Board nomination for Vasile Craciunescu
+1 here too :-) Cheers Andrea On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Silvia Franceschi < silvia.frances...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for Valile also from me! > > He is very active in involve people making things easily access. > > Regards > > Silvia > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:52 AM, andrea antonello < > andrea.antone...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I absolutely support Vasile's nomination. >> >> Vasile is a member of the community that is able to put a huge >> positive energy in Osgeo. >> >> Glad to hear he stands for nomination, >> Best regards, >> Andrea >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Jorge Sanz <js...@osgeo.org> wrote: >> > Forwarding Vasile Crăciunescu's nomination for the Board of Directors by >> > Gérald Fenoy. >> > >> > All the best >> > >> > -- >> > Jorge Sanz >> > CRO 2016 >> > >> > -- Mensaje reenviado -- >> > De: "Fenoy Gerald" <gerald.fe...@geolabs.fr> >> > Fecha: 13 sept. 2016 15:55 >> > Asunto: Board nomination for Vasile Craciunescu >> > Para: "Vasile Craciunescu" <c...@osgeo.org> >> > Cc: >> > >> >> Dear Cro, >> >> please find bellow the nomination for Vasile for this year election of >> >> OSGeo Board of Director. >> >> >> >> I would like to nominate Vasile Craciunescu for this year election. >> Vasile >> >> is a researcher at Romanian National Meteorological Administration, he >> is >> >> organizing conferences and workshops using the OSGeo technology and is >> a >> >> convinced and convincing FOSS4G promoter. He is very active in the >> Romanian >> >> community, he is one of the founder of the OSGeo romanian local >> chapter and >> >> always bring many members to the FOSS4G, to both local and >> international >> >> editions. Vasile was one of the pioneer, with Jachym, of the >> FoSS4G-Europe >> >> conferences after he had organized the second edition the FOSS4G-CEE >> in his >> >> country in Bucharest. He has taken responsibilities in many technical >> tasks >> >> for the board to accomplish his task and to facilitate the work of >> every >> >> board members. He has a good experience in working and leading research >> >> projects, he is the Romanian representative in Copernicus User Forum >> (the >> >> European Earth observation programme) and the representative of Meteo >> >> Romania at OGC. >> >> >> >> Vasile has proven his dedication to OSGeo over the year and, by >> competing >> >> again, he is proving, one more time, his dedication to the foundation. >> >> >> >> Vasile is a community leader and as such should be part of the Board of >> >> Director. >> >> >> >> All the best, >> >> >> >> >> >> Gérald Fenoy >> >> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/User:Djay >> >> >> > >> > ___ >> > Discuss mailing list >> > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> ___ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> > > > > -- > ing. Silvia Franceschi > Via Latemar, 22 > 38030 Castello di Fiemme (TN) > > tel: 0039 -3384501332 > > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divul
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2016] Board Nomination for Massimiliano Cannata
+1 here too :-) Cheers Andrea On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Silvia Franceschi < silvia.frances...@gmail.com> wrote: > I also support Massimiliano's nomination for his strong work in developing > open source application for environmental management which will be a key > issue for the next years. > > Regards > > Silvia > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:47 AM, andrea antonello < > andrea.antone...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I strongly support Massimiliano's nomination and am glad he stands for it. >> I think his attention for both the academic and business side of >> things is a great asset for our community. >> >> Regards, >> Andrea Antonello >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Jorge Sanz <js...@osgeo.org> wrote: >> > Find below Massimiliano Cannata nomination to the Board of Directors by >> > Gérald Fenoy. >> > >> > Best >> > Jorge >> > CRO 2016 >> > >> > -- Mensaje reenviado -- >> > De: "Fenoy Gerald" <gerald.fe...@geolabs.fr> >> > Fecha: 9 sept. 2016 15:39 >> > Asunto: Board nomination >> > Para: "Vasile Craciunescu" <c...@osgeo.org> >> > Cc: >> > >> >> Dear Cro, >> >> please find bellow my nomination. >> >> >> >> Hello OSGeo community, >> >> I would like to nominate Massimiliano Cannata aka "Maxi" from >> Switzerland >> >> as board member. >> >> >> >> Maxi is the leader of the geomatic division from the institute of Earth >> >> Sciences SUPSI. I had the pleasure of working with Maxi on the OSGeo >> board >> >> and greatly admire his dedication to the OSGeo community, logical >> approach >> >> and a keen knack of getting things done. He is deeply involved in >> OSGeo and >> >> FOSS4G at various level and is always willing to help and provide his >> >> relevant input on so many different topics, which sounds very >> important for >> >> a board member. He has proved his dedication to OSGeo during his term >> by >> >> being always constructive in the discussion and taking part of various >> >> committees, such as the United Nations committee for which he is now >> the >> >> co-chair. He is also involved in various projects at various level, the >> >> first which come to my mind is the istSOS project that he is leading >> with >> >> his team and his growing community, a workshop for istSOS is handled >> every >> >> year for at least 3 years during the FOSS4G. He is also involved in the >> >> ZOO-Project PSC since 2010 and was in the GRASS PSC from 2006 to 2016. >> His >> >> amazing knowledge about how things works in OSGeo or should work for >> the >> >> better, his dedication and his capability to work and discuss openly >> with >> >> different kind of people prove that he is a real asset for the OSGeo >> board. >> >> >> >> His personal OSGeo wiki page can be found here [1] >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> >> >> [1] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Massimiliano_Cannata >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Gérald Fenoy >> >> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/User:Djay >> >> >> > >> > ___ >> > Discuss mailing list >> > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> ___ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> > > > > -- > ing. Silvia Franceschi > Via Latemar, 22 > 38030 Castello di Fiemme (TN) > > tel: 0039 -3384501332 > > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consent
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2016] Board Nomination for Maria Brovelli
Yes please! Cheers Andrea On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Jorge Sanz <js...@osgeo.org> wrote: > Forwarding Maria Brovelli nomination to the board of directors by > Helena Mitasova > > Best, > Jorge > CRO 2016 > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Helena Mitasova <hmit...@ncsu.edu> > Date: 9 September 2016 at 05:07 > Subject: nomination of Maria Brovelli > To: c...@osgeo.org > Cc: Maria Antonia Brovelli <maria.brove...@polimi.it> > > > Maria Brovelli > maria.brove...@polimi.it > Italy > > I would like to nominate Professor Maria Brovelli for the board of > directors. > She is very well know in the community for her passion for open source > software and open data, > leader of numerous initiatives, including the latest outreach to United > Nations, > hosting FOSS4G Europe in 2015 and organizing several open source and > open data sessions > at the ISPRS congres in Prague in 2016. > Her leadership and contributions to OSGeo were recognized by Sol Katz > award in 2015 > and she is on the advisory board and one of the regional directors of > GeoForAll initiative. > She advised many students who made significant contributions to > several OSGeo projects > including GRASS GIS and understands both the community building and > the software development issues. > I feel strongly that she will be able to take on the challenging tasks > and often complex > decision making that comes with the the board of directors membership > given her experience as > Vice Rector for the Como Campus of Politecnico di Milano. See her page > for more information > https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/User:Maria > > Helena > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003. The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc. --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] GeoServer 2.9.0 Released
Hi Faustin, we are running GeoServer 2.9.0 on Java 8 exclusively, and if you want to play with it, there is also a demo server at http://demo.geo-solutions.it/geoserver/web/ that's running 2.9.x (the daily nightly build of that series) on Java 8. Do you have any logs reporting error messages? Did you have a previous version of GeoServer working, or is it the first time you try it? Cheers Andrea PS: this discussion might be better suited for the geoserver-users list, this one has many people that might not be interested in it On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Faustin Gashakamba < fgashaka...@arcosnetwork.org> wrote: > Hello Jody, > > I have had no luck in running GeoServer under Java 8. I keep seeing on the > website that it is compatible but that’s not the case with me. > > For instance, I just downloaded the WAR file of this new release and put > in Tomcat and restarted but it doesn’t run. > > I have other webapps in my Tomcat installation and they run fine. Any clue > on what’s going on? > > My java below: > > > > PS C:\Web\Tomcat\bin> java -version > > java version "1.8.0_91" > > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_91-b14) > > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.91-b14, mixed mode) > > PS C:\Web\Tomcat\bin> > > > > Your help will be much appreciated. > > > > Faustin > > > > *From:* Discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Jody > Garnett > *Sent:* 31 May 2016 00:42 > *To:* OSGeo Discussions <discuss@lists.osgeo.org> > *Subject:* [OSGeo-Discuss] GeoServer 2.9.0 Released > > > > The GeoServer team is happy to announce the release of GeoServer 2.9.0: > >- http://geoserver.org/release/2.9.0/ > > This is the new stable release suitable for use in production. This > release *requires the use of Java 8*. > > > > Important updates: > >- Web admin application layer, preview, global settings, image >processing and raster access screens have been updated. >- User guide has been restructured for ease of navigation and to >reduce duplication >- The REST API can now be used to manage icons, fonts and >configuration files and report on the status of installed components. >- Internally this release features Wicket 7 and Spring 4 and the >latest JAI-Ext library. >- Layer bounds can now be generated from spatial reference systems >extent >- Styles can now be configured with a custom legend. >- For more details please see the blog post ><http://blog.geoserver.org/2016/05/30/geoserver-2-9-0-released/> and >release notes (2.9.0 > > <https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1=13003> >|RC1 > > <https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1=12502> >|beta2 > > <https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1=12700> >|beta > > <https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1=12100> >|M0 > > <https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1=11401> >) > > Thanks to Jody and Devon (from Boundless) for publishing this release. > This release was delayed for two months due to incompatibility with Java 8. > Thanks for the dedicated testing a fix support from Andrea, Alessandro, > Alex, Ben, Brad, Jukka, Niels, Torben and others during this long release > cycle. Special thanks to sponsors of the Wicket 7 upgrade > <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoServer_Code_Sprint_2016> sprint: OSGeo > <http://www.osgeo.org/>, Boundless <http://boundlessgeo.com/>, Vivid > Solutions <http://www.vividsolutions.com/>, How 2 Map > <http://www.how2map.com/>, San Jose Water Company > <https://www.sjwater.com/>, Transient <http://transient.nz/>, Geobeyond > <http://www.geobeyond.it/> (with in-kind sponsors GeoSolutions, CCRi, > Astun Technology and Voyager). > > -- > > The GeoServer Team > > ___ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il lor
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Does rasdaman CE solve an open source geospatial problem?
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Andrea Aime <andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Cameron Shorter < > cameron.shor...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'd be interested to hear opinions of others in the field as to whether >> Rasdaman community version is of value for real-world production systems by >> itself. >> > > I guess that would depend on the needs of the production system itself, > and I'm not sure the OSGeo inclusion should be > based on how capable the software is... in short, I'd stay away from this > criteria. > Thinking about it, I believe this one needs some clarification. What I'm trying to say is that Rasdaman CE should be evaluated for it own merits and selected based on them, instead of being compared with its commercial brother and rejected because we find it lacking in the comparison. Most projects graduated years ago with a lot less functionality that they have today, we should be more concerned by how useful the project is today and how well it can grow in the future. I also stress that whether or not "open core" projects are natural members of OSGeo, or not, is a separate topic, but at the same time very important one. There is a lot of articles about "open core" to read on the internet... I've tried to search "Open core is good" on Google to give it a "positive" slant, I cannot really say the result of the search agree on... positive :-p It could just well be that the proponents have not spent enough time writing about its benefits. Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003. The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc. --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Does rasdaman CE solve an open source geospatial problem?
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Cameron Shorter <cameron.shor...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd be interested to hear opinions of others in the field as to whether > Rasdaman community version is of value for real-world production systems by > itself. > I guess that would depend on the needs of the production system itself, and I'm not sure the OSGeo inclusion should be based on how capable the software is... in short, I'd stay away from this criteria. However I believe this discussion raise an important point, it does not make sense to talk about Rasdaman without qualification, it makes sense to talk about Rasdaman CE and Rasdaman Enterprise, any discussion about the abilities of the software, benchmarks and the like, should be properly qualified by the version of it. I agree OSGeo should be mostly concerned about the CE version, and how open it actually is. Like, if someone develops an extension to it that mimics some of the enterprise functionality, will it be welcomed in the project? That is the most important aspect, the "open core" model has a clear tendency to keep the core version limited to show better value in the paid for version, but the community around the core version should not be pressured to stay away from improvements that would hurt the money making brother of it. While we are on the topic, there are also gray areas in which this model tends to fall into, which can ruffle some feathers as well. Say someone develops an improvement for the core version that is competitive, to some level, with some functionality of the enterprise version, and the company decides to "donate" the equivalent code because it's better developed, better tested, faster, more scalable and so on. This tends to hurt feelings on both sides, the community developer may feel walked over, his/her code dumped in the thrash, the company may feel like it's been held hostage of some ransom, by having to donate its superior code over the lower quality one offered by the community (of course, it could be the case that the community offers something better, but if that point is reached, the death bell is probably starting to sing for the open core approach). To some extend that's unavoidable I'm afraid, but I believe that OSGeo should at least be concerned that the community version is treated like a full open source project and everybody feels empowered to pitch into it according to their needs and abilities. Then there is another topic of discussion, which is whether OSGeo agrees with a dual licensing model to start with, given the obvious tension that it generates between a open community and the company benefiting from it. Peter cites the need to make a honest living doing open source, and the open core module as a way to reach that objective. As a long time open source developer involved in single licence software I never felt like I was underpaid or mistreated, even when I have clear vision of companies making money off work that sometimes I did over holidays... I simply knew what I was getting myself into, and what the consequences of an open license are. That said, I do appreciate that people want to get an honest living and work in open source at the same time, it's simply too good of an opportunity to miss. Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003. The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Incubator] Should OSGeo accept "benevolent dictator" projects into OSGeo?
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Cameron Shorter <cameron.shor...@gmail.com> wrote: > OSGeo discuss, OSGeo incubation, OSGeo board, > > I'm hoping the greater OSGeo community will consider and comment on this > question: > > Should OSGeo accept a "benevolent dictator" [1] governance model for > incubating projects? > > -0 from me, Cameron Shorter. > Hi Cameron, I've been thinking about this one for a while, allowing benevolent dictatorships as graduated OSGeo projects looks like a significant departure from what OSGeo has been so far. As such, I'm wondering if the decision should not be made by consulting directly all charter members, to check if today's OSGeo is in agreement with such a direction? A list discussion on list is good to allow pros and cons to be discussed, but tends to favor the more vocal people, leaving the "general opinion" largely unknown. Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003. The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc. --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) < patrick.ho...@nasa.gov> wrote: > It appears to me that even these more-substantial-than-hackathons sprints > do not reflect the typical work environment for code development. I will > suggest that requires more of the 'deep thought' Leonardo approach versus > the more intuitive 'just start chiseling' of a Michelangelo. > Patrick, it seems to be you imagining a work environment that's quite different from the one a software developer in a company doing consulting (typical open source setup) has. My normal work environment requires me to work for 2-5 different customers a day spanning from training, spec-ing and designing new modules/applications, meetings, and actual development, along with answering questions from my colleagues on other activities, often unrelated to the ones that I'm in charge of. During a typical open source code sprint I'm focused on a single activity all day instead. To be clear, I'm not complaining, if my daily work was single activity I'd walk away out of boredom, what keeps the typical code sprint engaging is also that we normally take on activity that seem hard to fit in the allowed time, and thus require some extras in terms of concentration and inventiveness to actually get completed :-p I'd say the recipe for a typical successful open source code sprint is: * Several developers in the same room, that are normally working from remote in different time zones * An ambitious objective (not so large/difficult that it's impossible to complete, but enough that you cannot relax and finish it anyways) * Typically, full day experience (e.g., we have lunch and dinner together too) * Coffee... lots of it :-p Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003. The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc. --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo guidelines for code hosting ?
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote: > How does that diagram counts contributors ? > > With SVN it's very unlikely that a bot can recognize contributors > other than the committers, while with GIT it's easier to make the > actual contributor visible to a machine (being there an "author" > field in addition to the "committer" field). > Indeed, it counts the committers, and it's true that it can be skewed, but I assure you the overall effect is negligible. Before pull requests we used to add a "patch by xyz" in the commit message to give credit to the actual author. I looked at the year right before the github switch, there are 4 commits like that in total (I searched for just "by" to make sure not to skip stuff written with slight differences). If I look at the last year and ask for a contributor count I get: > git shortlog -nsu --since "one year ago" | wc -l 84 Github tells me there are 34 developers with direct commit access, but I checked who made a commit in the last year. we are down to only 24 people. Sometimes devs commit from another computer and they don't have their mail setup, which makes for a two lines in that statistic, one with the username, one with the mail e.g. in that list we have for example Mauro listed twice (and so is mine): 27 Mauro Bartolomeoli 24 mbarto So that reduces the number of actual unique contributorsq a bit, let's say down to 75-80... it's still 50 random people contributing to GeoServer without commit access in the last year, or, in other words, 10 times more external contributions compared to before the switch to Github. The thing is, we still have patches in the bug tracker that are a few years old, and they will likely never be merged: when they came in they probably were either dirty, or core devs were too busy, and after a few months applying them becomes rather challenging, so there they stay: the merge barrier was too high, too domanding on the core devs. With the current pull request mechanism we have a much improved ability to handle contributions, in part because people are reminded of the contribution rules the moment they make the pull request, in part because the build servers inform the submitter about a problem in the pull request rather quickly, but also because we can comment in a more social way about the pull request (before reviewing the patch was a one man job), and also because they are always nicely grouped and in front of our eyes at every PSC meeting (we check the pull request queue like that every two weeks, to see if there is anything that merits special attention). > > I'm not trying to negate the possible benefits in terms of number > of contributors, but I'd be careful about the correctess of available > data. > > > There is another benefit of moving to Github, which is build checks on > pull > > requests, > > Yes, this is something we unfortunately lost on OSGeo. > We used to have buildbot running to that extent, but lack of volunteers > made that experience come to an end. > Mind, here I'm talking about a special integration, not the normal continuous build for commits that are integrated, but a custom build for the pull request, which tells you whether or not merging that pull request will break the build (to clarify, by build I mean both compiling and running all automated tests save for OGC CITE compliance ones). The pull request build status, along with an indication if the patch is mergeable, and possibly an indication of whether the test coverage went up or down, is a huge time saver. If a review of the patch is satisfying, the build give us the green, we can literally just press the merge button, thank the contributor, and move on with our work/live, instead of spending time trying to apply while the code moved, build, go back and forth with the committer in a rather inefficient way (and manually run build/tests every damn time), and so on. Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo guidelines for code hosting ?
Hi, just wanted to chime in saying that if OSGeo starts setting said guidelines, it should also have some benefits comparison so that projects can see what they might not get by avoiding Github. In particular, looking at GeoServer experience from the switch, it's rather evident we got more people contributing right the moment we did the switch, here is the contributors per month diagram, the red line is the date we switched from svn to GitHub: [image: Inline image 1] Most of this is due to two factors: - availability of pull requests (which I believe you can get with other tools too) - critical mass on the platform (which arguably you will not get an a OsGeo hosting) There is however a downside of that, most of these contributions are "one time gigs", people help addressing the particular pitfall concerning them and then they move on: github did not change the number of core developers, it just increased a lot the number of other contributors. There is another benefit of moving to Github, which is build checks on pull requests, we now have Travis (Linux, OSX) building all pull requests and running the test suite against them, so we instantly know if the change breaks tests or not, and we planning on adding test coverage checks (Coveralls, already used by OpenLayers for example) and Windows builds (already used by MapServer for example). This kind of automation is also rather beneficial to filter our bad contributions... which is the dark side of lower contribution barrier, core devs have to spend quite some time evaluating pull requests... but ending up with a long queue of them gives a bad impression about the project openness. So yeah, another bit to consider I guess, is the project ready to take on them? So I'm not saying "everybody move to github" but I believe the above should be part of the many considerations made when evaluating a move to a different version control. Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003. The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc. --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo is becoming irrelevant. Here's why. Let's fix it.
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Milo van der Linden <m...@dogodigi.net> wrote: > Being a "don't talk, act" member since 2008, entrepreneur and former > chairman of a couple of local initiatives, I strongly agree. > > Seeing all the "empty talkers" from my country run for charter membership > and still not having geoserver, which is the most mature open geospatial > product I can think of pas incubation made me completely lose interest in > OSGeo. > Hi Milo, to be completely honest, I cannot put an ounce of blame on OSGeo for GeoServer not graduating quickly, the goals were there and were clear and GeoServer was basically satisfying all but one of them from day one: unfortunately we failed to execute on the IP review, which is a manual, long, boring task, mostly because we were too busy with other stuff. Eventually Jody managed to wrangle volunteers at a code sprint, got every single file checked/fixed/reported, and voilà, shortly after we passed graduation. Other foundations have a dedicated team to do IP reviews, but those are paid staff, not sure OSGeo can afford that... on the other side, every project with a large code base will have a hard time putting aside the time to go though every single file to check for IP violations. Just my 2 (euro) cents ;-) Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003. The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc. --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Maven repository is down
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Petar Tahchiev paranoia...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, you maven repository is down :( http://download.osgeo.org/webdav/geotools/ I wonder why are all the artifacts not synced with the maven central - it's uptime is really good, and I don't have to specify extra repositories in my build. Getting them there is sometimes time consuming (we don't have the people time to do it) and for some it's just impossible (e.g., JAI). We also issue several MB worth of releases once a month, not sure if central has policy against large and frequent releases, and we would need to find a mechanism that avoids making releases more time consuming. If you want to help synching what's possible to maven central, you're more than welcomed to so, many would appreciate that work :-) Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003. The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc. --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Discussion on statement : avoiding slang. Was: Drafting a Diversity statement for the foundation (call for input)
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Massimiliano Cannata massimiliano.cann...@supsi.ch wrote: Hi all, Madi, The only issue with multilingual community to consider is that sometime non native language may express not perfectly and their words could be misunderstood. So I would suggest to include to native to be patient and open versus non native language... Indeed... especially since the simplest first forms of expression one learns are the most direct ones, so most sentences end up sounding like orders/direct complaints, lacking the nuances that would make them sound more polite Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003. The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc. --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Discussion on statement : avoiding slang. Was: Drafting a Diversity statement for the foundation (call for input)
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Cameron Shorter cameron.shor...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks all for the feedback. So my question is: 1. Should our Code of Conduct/Diversity statement mention that we have a multilingual community? I believe it's still a good idea. 2. What should we recommend that all, and especially native speakers do to make our community welcoming to non-native speakers? I'd suggest, just a reminder that the level of written English can vary a lot, ranging from cases where the lack of fluency is evident, to cases where the sentence seems just too direct/rude, so generally speaking, it's a good idea to try and be patient and understanding. Sometimes I wish there was a guide of typical expectations/orientations varying culture by culture, to try and understand better where people are coming from and put what they say in context (this example might be wrong or just a silly generalizations, but just to give you an idea, I've heard Japanese normally won't say no in a conversation, you have to figure it out, and other cultures surely have their surprising traits as well). Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003. The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc. --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Projects mailing lists
Hi, went to do it, but it seems that Jody also updated the GeoServer ones already? Or at least, someone did :-) Cheers Andrea On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com wrote: Filled in details for GeoTools Jody Garnett On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Jachym Cepicky secret...@osgeo.org wrote: Hi, I would like to ask all our OSGeo projects contact points, to join the projects mailing list [1], so we have one single contact point for all projects. I would also like to ask projects chairs/contact points, to update the wiki [2] with your e-mail address, as described in my previous mail [3] and let me know (preferably in response to this mail), that you've done this. Please, let me know (preferably in response to this mail), that you have done so. Some of you already did (thank you! and sorry, if you have to read this message one more time) We just want to make sure, there is up-to-date link between OSGeo and it's projects Thank you. Jachym - Secretary [1] http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/projects [2] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Contacts#Software_Projects [3] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/2014-September/002490.html ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it *AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003* Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003. The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc. --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2014] Nomination for Silvia Franceschi
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Jorge Sanz js...@osgeo.org wrote: Forwarding Silvia Franceschi nomination by Venka Yes please! +1 Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Election 2014] Nomination for Andrea Antonello
And another +1 for yet another one I thought was a charter member already :-) Cheers Andrea On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Jorge Sanz js...@osgeo.org wrote: Forwarding Andrea Antonello nomination by Luca Delucchi Best Jorge -- Forwarded message -- From: Luca Delucchi Date: 2014-07-24 8:44 GMT+02:00 Subject: Andrea Antonello nomination To: c...@osgeo.org I would like to nominate Andrea Antonello as Charter Member. He is long time contributor to several OSGeo Java project. http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Advocate#Andrea_Antonello -- Jorge Sanz http://www.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Jorge_Sanz ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Nomination for Milan Antonovic
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Venkatesh Raghavan ragha...@media.osaka-cu.ac.jp wrote: On 2014/07/22 19:52, Massimiliano Cannata wrote: I would like to nominate Milan Antonovic for OSGeo charter membership. I second this nomination. Milan is a regular at international and regions FOSS4G events and I did not realize that he was not CM as yet. Same here, seconding the nomination Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Membership fee (was: Proposed process for selecting OSGeo charter members)
example quoted by Paul, there are several benefits associated: access to journals, reduced prices to publications/meetings, etc... That would mean that there is a commitment of OSGeo to provide the advertized benefits, and thus the question on how to guarantee this commitment would arise : volunteers effort, or paid staff/contractors ? Interestingly one of the benefit of AAG membership is access to AAG specialty groups whose equivalent in OSGeo would probably be our mailing lists. So would we want to restrict access to those to non members ? Mateusz also mentionned that bills have to be paid to maintain some OSGeo servers, like svn. Would we want to restrict access to those servers only to the folks who have paid the membership fee ? Probably not. We have only mentionned individual members, but would we want to extend to corportate members as well ? From my perspective, OSGeo Charter membership is a recognition for the accomplishments of an individual to support OSGeo values and missions, and thus gets a right to define its steering through board election. Perhaps we at a community sometimes fail to welcome people who would deserve it, because they are a bit outside of our usual networks to be nominated (or because people are not confortable enough to do public nominations, perhaps for language or cultural reasons), or because we reach the yearly quota for new members. That's certainly a pitty if folks feel excluded whereas I think we generally try to be rather inclusive. One thing to keep in mind is that if we translate into money the value of the accomplishments of OSGeo Charter members, I'm pretty sure that in 99.99% of the cases that translates to much more than USD 70. You can probably add one or two zeros to that figure. So asking them for a fee, in addition to their other forms of contribution, would seem a bit awkward, although I can understand that contribution in term of money rather than time is sometimes more useful. So I wouldn't object to paying a membership fee. But IMHO the main question is : do we need membership fees to sustain OSGeo ? Aren't surplus funds generated by FOSS4G sufficient for that (although I can understand that Howard's fear that FOSS4G organization by volunteers might not be a sustainable model) ? Or perhaps we would need more funds to be able to do more things ? OSGeo is perhaps rather different from other organizations in the geomatics field in the way it manages its membership, but is it more a strength or a weakness ? Even ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Yours sincerely, ir. Dirk Frigne CEO Geosparc n.v. Brugsesteenweg 587 B-9030 Ghent Tel: +32 9 236 60 18 GSM: +32 495 508 799 http://www.geomajas.org http://www.geosparc.com ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] Java GIS developers: a new open source project to speed-up map rendering
Hi, I wanted to point out some new work being developed in open source to speed up Java map drawing, the Marlin renderer: https://github.com/bourgesl/marlin-renderer The renderer is an improved version of the Pisces renderer found in the OpenJDK builds, which provides significant speed up over Pisces, and significant scalability benefits over Ductus, the closed source rasterizer included in the Oracle JDK binary builds. I believe this to be of interest of anyone running/developing Java GIS applications against OpenJDK, and of anyone doing multi-threaded map rendering against any JDK (examples coming to mind, DeeGree and uDig). So, I invite you to give it a spin and report back, we also have a mailing list to share experiences and coordinate development here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/marlin-renderer Here are some benchmark results for the specific case of GeoServer to wet your appetite: http://geo-solutions.blogspot.it/2014/02/geoserver-improved-scalability.html Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] What happened to planet.osgeo.org?
Hi, is it just me, or the blog aggregator at planet.osgeo.org has been down for a few days now? http://planet.osgeo.org/ Wondering what's happening? I haven't seen announcements of it being taken down, or moved. Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G-NA videos and slides
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote: On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:43 PM, David Fawcett david.fawc...@gmail.comwrote: I will get them up this week. Hi David, any news? FOSS4G 2013 is almost upon us, but I'm still keen to have a look at some of the FOSS4G NA presentation slides :-) Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G workshop contacts
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Barry Rowlingson b.rowling...@lancaster.ac.uk wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it wrote: Hi, I'd like to ask details about the FOSS4G 2013 workshops organization, machines and the like, but it seems I don't have the right contacts. Do you know who I could bother to ask about those details? Contact emails are here: http://2013.foss4g.org/about-foss4g/contact/ and in the absence of a specific workshop contact, use the 'info' mailing address. That goes to a small bunch of us who will make sure the workshop organiser gets it. Thanks a lot for the prompt response It might well be time to set up a workshop mailing list. Actually... OSGeo has a conference-workshop mailing list: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference-workshops which has been dead since Sept 2011. Yeah, it would be nice, I believe several people would be interested and may probably reduce the load on your side, in terms of avoiding to answer the same questions over and over Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G workshop contacts
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote: Contact emails are here: http://2013.foss4g.org/about-foss4g/contact/ and in the absence of a specific workshop contact, use the 'info' mailing address. That goes to a small bunch of us who will make sure the workshop organiser gets it. Thanks a lot for the prompt response Hmm... I've sent a mail to the info address, but it seems nobody will be there until July 24th (got an auto responder saying so). Oh well, I've tried... Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G workshop contacts
Hi, I'd like to ask details about the FOSS4G 2013 workshops organization, machines and the like, but it seems I don't have the right contacts. Do you know who I could bother to ask about those details? Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Nomination of Peter Baumann
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Fenoy Gerald gerald.fe...@geolabs.frwrote: Hello, it is an honor for me to nominate Peter Baumann [1] as OSGeo Charter Member. I suppose that everybody know Peter Bauman first for the amazing work he make at OGC and on rasdaman project which is currently in the OSGeo Incubation Process. Peter mixes between research and business, he is professor at Jacobs University Bremen and also the founder and CEO of rasdaman GmbH. Peter is very active as an OGC member and in general in real life he is what I would call a passionate community guy, always open to discussion, sharing his view / ideas and trying to find ways to make OSGeo projects collaborating with each other. Peter Baumann was one of the Keynote speakers at the FOSS4G-CEE this year as our president was. I think that Peter can be a real asset for OSGeo for promoting OSGeo with the passion, knowledge and relevance which characterize himself. I second the nomination too Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Nomination for Alessandro Furieri
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote: It is my honor to nominate Alessandro Furieri as OSGeo Charter Member. Seconded :) Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] nomination for Just van den Broecke
Seconding Just nomination, well deserved. Cheers Andrea On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Bart van den Eijnden bart...@osgis.nlwrote: I'd like to nominate Just van den Broecke for Osgeo charter membership. Just has invested a lot of his time in getting the Dutch language chapter of Osgeo set up recently (see http://osgeo.nl) . He has worked with a lot of the OsGeo software projects and has also developed tools in the open source domain on top of this such as Heron Mapping Components (http://heron-mc.org) and Streaming ETL ( http://www.stetl.org/en/latest/). In 2012 he organised the Osgeo track at the GeoSpatial World Forum (GWF) and he is a regular visitor to FOSS4G and the Bolsena hacking event as well Best regards, Bart -- Bart van den Eijnden OSGIS - http://osgis.nl ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G-NA videos and slides
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:41 PM, David William Bitner bit...@dbspatial.comwrote: We are working at pulling the slides we can gather together. If you search for foss4gna on Twitter, you can find many folks who have already posted their slides on their own. Hi David, any progress since last mail? (June 4th) I'm sure there is a large amount of people that would be interested in having a look at the slides around here :-) Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] report OSGeo track at GWF 2013
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Paul van Genuchten paul.vangenuch...@geocat.net wrote: Hi list at the 2013 edition of Geospatial World Forum held in Rotterdam 13-16 may 2013 OSGeo cohosted a seminar on Open Source ( http://geospatialworldforum.org/2013/open_pr.htm). This document shortly describes the key points raised in each presentation. Thanks for the nice summary, quite informative for those that could not attend! Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer training in Milan, 6th 7th June 2013! Visit http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Would you be concerned if the GeoServices REST API became an OGC standard?
All, I've followed this thread with interest, thanks for the insightful discussion. If I can spare my 2 cents, is that the OGC specifications are complex enough already, with differences in behavior in the various versions, that adding another set of competing standards is just going to increase confusion quite a bit, diluting the OGC position as a reference for standards to a point of no return. Several of the ideas in the REST GeoServices are good, yes, there is demand for REST geoservices, and yes, JSON is popular, yet, especially from the point of view of someone that participates to open source communities, it's sort of unbelievable that someone can come and impose something to be a standard as-is, no questions asked. It's ok for it to be a starting point, but to be something that is embraced at large it should be allowed to be pruned and modified to everybody's satisfaction. Also, I'm not sure here, but not building on top of the existing standards it will likely introduce new terminology, making it harder to talk about the services in a way that makes people understand each other. Adding a REST service on top of existing standards, such as WFS (as a new network binding) and GeoJSON would likely lower this risk significantly. About implementing it or not, I cannot speak for the GeoServer PSC, but we are normally open and pragmatic, so I doubt that if someone comes up with an implementation of the ESRI GeoServervices API we'd refuse it, and if it gets enough traction, it might well enter the core functionality. It's more about someone contributing the code, and the overall user community showing appreciation for it, than making a political statement. Cheers Andrea ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OGC compliance of WMS client
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Sebastian Goerke goe...@lat-lon.dewrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, yes Andrea, but in my opinion it is not forbidden to have additional support for the other alternative. You have to implement the case sensitive KVP but it is not forbidden to implement the other additionally. That's a grey area in the spec indeed. There are CITE tests checking that the key is treated as case insensitive, but I don't remember one checking for case sensitive values. It would be interesting to see if there is anything in the WMS client CITE test suite? Was it made public, by the way? Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer training in Milan, 6th 7th June 2013! Visit http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Happy birthday OSGeo!
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Jeff McKenna jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.comwrote: Here are some interesting OSGeo stats pulled today: - 195 mailing lists - unique mailing list subscribers: 19160 - osgeo.org: 30487 unique visitors for month of January - wiki.osgeo.org: 2720 pages, 12550 users, 17M views - 1,350,000 google hits for osgeo Happy birthday everyone! Just one quick comment... wow! :-) Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] pycsw Receives OGC Compliance Certification and Reference Implementation Status
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Angelos Tzotsos gcpp.kal...@gmail.comwrote: 14 January 2013 The pycsw development team is happy to announce that pycsw 1.4.0 is now certified OGC Compliant for OGC CSW 2.0.2 [1], and passes all 103 CITE tests. As well, pycsw is now an official OGC Reference Implementation. A demonstration instance of the reference implementation is available at http://demo.pycsw.org. Congratulations :-) Wondering, what steps did you follow to have pycsw also become a reference implementation? I thought the RI where chosen only while developing the CITE tests for a particular standard, but the CSW 2.0.2 tests have been out for a while Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OpenLayers WMS OSM is LonLat in water?
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:26 PM, izzybitsie izzybit...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, could someone let me know how I could find out if a chosen LonLat is in water? I looked at the GetFeatureInfo example, but it only applies to Tasmania map. I have not been able to find a worldwide map to use GetFeatureInfo assuming this is the right way to go. Among the OGC services, I guess using a WFS GetFeature with a query of type point intersection against a layer that has precise shorelines, and returning only the hits as opposed to the records, would be better. You could load data from Natural Earth, or if that is not precise enough, use the global high resolution shoreline dataset. By the name of the layer I assume you're using GeoServer. A request that would get you the result you want might be (mind, not tested, and using some GeoServer specific extensions for easier filtering): http://host/geoserver/wfs?service=WFSversion=1.1.0request=GetFeatureresultType=hitsCQL_FILTER=INTERSECTS(the_geom, POINT(lat, lon)) Mind, since the above is using WFS 1.1 the coordinates will have to be entered in lat/lon order, whilst the_geom is the name of the geometry attribute for shapefiles in GeoServer, if you are loading into a database check what is the actual geometry column name there) Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Sol Katz Award Nomination procedure (was Nomination for Venkatesh Raghavan)
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Daniel Morissette dmorisse...@mapgears.com wrote: While I am all for openness in general, I share Howard's concerns in this specific case and think we should continue with private nominations. Agreed (for what is worth). It would be sad if we started seeing sorts of mass voting against a nomination thread, mostly because it would look a lot like a political election (my idea of the Soul Katz Award is that OSGeo is looking for an excellence which is not necessarily the one of just being popular, thought of course strong commitment in the community has that side effect) However... maybe someone should push the OSGeo community to send private nominations more? I have no idea, no raw data, but in the years I have had the impression that the importance of nomination period could be stressed more, thus getting more nominations and as a result a better sampling from the community. Just rambling here, don't take me too seriously :-p Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 962313 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New charter members!
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Michael P. Gerlek m...@flaxen.com wrote: We received 22 nominations for the 2012 Charter Members. There were 20 membership positions available, but the board acted over the weekend to increase that number to 22. Therefore, on behalf of the OSGeo Board and the entire OSGeo community, I am pleased to welcome the following people as OSGeo Charter Members for 2012: Woot! Cheers Andrea -- Ing. Andrea Aime GeoSolutions S.A.S. Tech lead Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 962313 mob:+39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime http://twitter.com/geowolf ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [Geoserver-devel] [OSGeo-Discuss] 39 out of 43 excellent project overview docs, ready for the OSGeo-Live DVD - 3 days left
Ian Turton ha scritto: Just to let people know that I've agreed to write some GeoServer docs for the liveDVD - unless someone else jumps in and beats me to it. Ian, many, many thanks :-) Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] 5 Star OSGeo project maturity rating
Cameron Shorter ha scritto: For the OSGeo LiveDVD and OSGeo marketing material, I propose we use a 5 star maturity rating. This is because it is too difficult to explain in a couple of words, the difference between: Graduated, In Incubation, Stable, Beta Again, I'm interested to hear comments on whether I have defined a good rating system, before we set it in stone. A rating system, imho, should take into consideration multiple vectors: - does the project have a long history? - how big is the developers community (e.g. number of active committers in the last year) - what are the steps taken to keep the code base quality high (unit tests, nightly builds, code reviews, and so on) - how diversified is the developer community (are all developers affiliated to a single entity, or distributed among many? What is the bus factor in terms of companies) - how live the development is (e.g., number of commits/changed files/ size of the diff between today and one year ago) - how big is the user community (e.g., nummber of subscribers to the users list) - does it have user documentation - does it have developer documentation - does it have stable/frequent releases - has it been awarded OSGEO project status, is it in incubation? These (and others) could be assigned some score, and then you could sum them and get to an overall score. Some elements could have a weight higher than others to accomodate for relative importance (e.g., part of OSGEO could be weighted higher than the other items). Just my 2 cents Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Demo WMS server
Stefan Steiniger ha scritto: how about this one: http://wms.jpl.nasa.gov/wms.cgi Am I the only one getting a 403 when trying to access that server? http://wms.jpl.nasa.gov/wms.cgi?REQUEST=GetCapabilitiesSERVICE=WMS Is that server somehow deciding not to serve european hosts or something like that? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Demo WMS server
Jochen Topf ha scritto: I am just working on a piece of Open Source software that can access WMS servers. I'd like to have some kind of demo server that could be configured in the software by default so that people have a working configuration directly after install which makes it easier for them to get going. The server doesn't have to do much, just deliver a simple world map or so. I looked around a bit for suitable demo servers, but didn't find any. It should be something with a reasonable chance that it will be around for a while. I could imagine that other people have the same problem. How about having such a WMS server on a OSGeo host somewhere? I don't expect a huge amount of load on such a server, its just for demo and not for actual use, really. What do you think about this? I don't have access to any OSGeo hosts, but would be willing to help with the setup. Anyways, back on topic, if you want you can use http://demo.opengeo.org/geoserver and in particular: http://demo.opengeo.org/geoserver/ows?service=wmsversion=1.1.1request=GetCapabilities (the server provides also WFS and WCS services, with a few layers WFS-T editable) The set of layers is still a bit messy but I'm planning to publish at least the ThematicMapping.org country layer and maybe later during the month the natural earth dataset. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] open source polygon cluster aggregation algorithm?
G. Allegri ha scritto: I'm looking for an algorithm to do polygon cluster aggregation, similar to the ArcInfo Aggregate Polygon [1]. I know about GEOS Cascaded Union, but I need two more features: 1 - clustering of polygons that fall within a a certain threshold distance from each other 2 - mantain orthogonality, i.e. the original angles/shapes I don't know of any such implementation, but it looks somewhat similar to the computation of a concave hull: http://ubicomp.algoritmi.uminho.pt/local/concavehull.html http://stackoverflow.com/questions/83593/is-there-an-efficient-algorithm-to-generate-a-2d-concave-hull Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] are there any unpaid developers?
Ian Turton ha scritto: One of my students was asking today about the open source development process (with special reference to geospatial projects). One question I'm left with is are there any OSGEO developers who are doing this just for the fun and fame? I know that a lot of us have fun developing but everyone I could think of (GeoTools, GeoServer, uDig) gets paid to have that fun. My first few years of Geotools were completely unpaid: wake up at 5, worth though the weekends, to get it to work enough for my students at the uni to use (so in a sense there was a work purpose, but I was barely paid just for the hours spent in the classroom and nobody pushed for them use an open source library). Today I'm paid to work on GeoTools/GeoServer, but I still put in weekends time so there is still an unpaid portion. I don't think it can really go away: paid stuff is directed by company/customer needs /plans, on the spare time you do what you feel is good/necessary/fun instead. I don't believe you can really be involved if you don't have that kind of passion, yes, one can just work in an OS project, but it's not really the same thing as real involvement. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] How to use DXF and GeoTools?
Roy Braam wrote: Hello Landon, We created a dxf datastore for geotools but didn't submitted it to the geotools project yet. Because it's not fully tested. Perhaps this is a good moment to submit it? If you ask the same question on the geotools list (bcc to me) i'll answer with a link to the source download. Perhaps it will be added to the geotools project then. Roy, in GeoTools we have this concept of unsupported modules, they are there so that people can work on them with a public svn and get other people interested in them. Of course to make the module supported it has to be covered with unit tests, but that is not a requirement for unsupported ones. Let's discuss this on the GeoTools-dev list? :-) Cheers Andrea ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
Rafal Wawer ha scritto: Hi Jovi, For a start you can take a look at the evaluation results of CASCADOSS project - you will find there also other types of FOSS4G software too. http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=16Itemid=16 http://www.cascadoss.eu/en/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=16Itemid=16 The evaluation is a bit out of date - valid for early 2008, but the evaluation method itself may provide the clues how to look at and compare FOSS4G software projects. I am wondering if the GeoServer report was submitted to the GeoServer community for double checking? I've noticed a few errors in the report (even for beginning 2008). For example we had in-build testing since spring 2007, the project was already more than 5 years old in 2008 and so on. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Comparison
Mateusz Loskot ha scritto: Stefan Steiniger wrote: same for me - I stumbled over this page after a hint from Markus - and nobody ever asked us to have a look over it or send an email. Stefan, Please try to understand what Rafal says. It was intentional and it was part of the idea of the evaluation made in frame of the CASCADOSS project. There is no point in making outraged debate if this idea was right or not, as it would be a never-ending story. It would be better to consider it as a software benchmark. It is not possible to create a benchmark that is completely and fully objective and makes happiness and peace in every corner of all geeky mindship. Every study makes particular assumptions, so CASCADOSS study does. The point is to review current status and make it better. Checking open source software against its documentation is like evaluating commercial software against the help you can get on community driven forums (if there are any). Anyways, I agree this discussion would not take us anywhere and I won't comment any further. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] WCS/WMS accuracy tests?
Steven M. Ottens wrote: Hi all, I've finished my tests. The conclusion: Geoserver has a bug which offsets all the results by half a pixel, this is a known issue with the definition of the location of a pixel. Added to this there’s the no-data border which appears with non-native, non-multiple requests. I presume that will be gone once the pixel issue is resolved. Ah hem, are you sure it's correct to call it a bug? My impression is that we are respecting the OGC specs to the letter and that, as it often happens, the real world is actually working differently, but I need to double check with Simone that dealt with this issue more in detail Cheers Andrea ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo barriers to entry
Frank Warmerdam ha scritto: Certainly all of the above tend to apply to many people contributing to OSGeo projects. Certainly the bulk of my work on GDAL, and MapServer is client funded. I know that most of the contributors to GDAL and MapServer have at least some of their time funded. Likewise many of the other projects though my knowledge gets thinner on some of them. I think one challenge is to get people who have funded time to work on specific features into broader involvement with the projects and OSGeo in general. I believe the idea that OSGEO projects contributor tend to be paid to work on the project itself is the result the very selection criteria to become an OSGEO project: - mature project - established user base - a formal governance model This tells me the project has lots of contributors, lots of people that have a stake on it, a big enough user base that the possibility of funding is no more a pipe dream but a solid reality. Such a project by its very nature will tend to attract more people that can find funding to work on the project itself. Also, being estabilshed, it will have some barriers to entry in terms of the code base size and complexity itself, and QA processes that will make it harder to just look at the project for a weekend, cook up something, give it back and disappear. I guess one of the challenges for projects in OSGEO is exactly that: how do we create easy contribution opportunities that can be tackled with limited effort by people interested in contributing a weekend and/or just get a little involved in the community? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo barriers to entry
Landon Blake ha scritto: Andrea, You wrote: This tells me the project has lots of contributors, lots of people that have a stake on it, a big enough user base that the possibility of funding is no more a pipe dream but a solid reality. Such a project by its very nature will tend to attract more people that can find funding to work on the project itself. I'm curious about how we get a project to the point you describe. That seems to be an even greater challenge. If there was a recipe we would not see that many failed open source projects ;-) However someone wrote a book to help: http://producingoss.com/ Mind, the book will save people from obvious mistakes, and our course you need technical talent too, but past that, imho the personalities of the people involved (treating a project as a pile of code instead as a group of people is another common mistake imho), dedication, good timing and even just luck are really playing the difference between success and failure. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] WMS Performance Shootout presentation/results
Craig Miller ha scritto: I agree wholeheartedly. It looks like the bottleneck was the database. I’ve been privy to some MapServer tests done by testing teams over several months and the result there was always deploying the data with long update cycles to the middle tier disks instead of using the database. Only then could the performance of the actual map servers be evaluated. Performance shootouts/testing take time to do correctly as each run teaches you more and more about how your deployment architecture affects the results. Actually running the benchmarks it looked the CPU was the bottleneck, we had 25% cpu load in the single test (so 100% of the one CPU used by that test, out of the 4 available) and during the higher loads the CPU usage was jumping between 80% and 100% (so almost all 4 cpu maxed out). The database server was hardly using more than 25-30% of its CPU and the network shouldn't have played the bottleneck either (past experience suggests it takes a tilecache to actually turn a 100Mbit line into a bottlenek), thought we don't have numbers for that During the benchmark I had very little time to run profilers, but the few times I've tried in GeoServer the time seemed to be splitted quite equally between data fetching, actual drawing, and output image encoding... which is kind of the worst thing you can get out of a profile run, since it does not point to any culprit. Getting a profile out of MapServer is surely going to be interesting, the codebase is smaller and there is no garbage collection going on so the results should be clearer. Looking forward to see those results :-) Cheers Andrea ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Symbology/styles exchange
Olivier ERTZ ha scritto: Hi, while you read my little answer, just imagine a big smile on my face, because what you describe in your call is something that really motivates me. I was currently doing a kind of same investigation, and Osmarender, Kosmos, MassGIS Wiki on SLD, ... could all be added to your starting list, and I came to the same conclusions : having a symbology and styling platform to share would be great, and I sign up with two hands. So, I'm ready to help in building a wiki page to write the specification of such a platform. Well, personally I don't have much time, but the idea is engaging. What I would like to see in such a platform is: - easy to get into it. Register and contribute - have some focus on the contribution license, it is important that whoever shares decides how others can reuse his work - peer review (voting system) - comments, possibly treaded - a discussion on each contribution - forum, where people can discuss map making more in general - visual, everything we talk about (style, symbols, softwares, data) should be accompained by at least one screenshot, the screenshot should appear in all listings - categorized, so that if I'm interested in symbols I know where to go... maybe we more than one way to categorize stuff, think point symbols vs fills but also geology vs road maps The kde-looks.org plaftorm seems to offer all of the above with little/no effort. If there is no dedicated team to build a new site going to that platform seems a good way to test out the concept with little investment. The one thing I don't like much about kde-looks.org platform is that I don't understand well its licensing issues, if any, and the fact that a map styling site would be better owned by OSGEO. But in the end, I'd prefer to see one site with some chance of success despite some issues, that a lengthly discussion about tools, people that want to make them up with different technologies, and end up with nothing done because all the energy is lost in discussion, if you know what I mean. I'm more of looking for technologies that provide all of the above (or most of the above) out of the box and see what comes out by comparing them. Of course, OSGeo_map_symbol_set is then to be taken in consideration, and for sure people who wrote this wiki page will feel concerned... I don't believe there should be any concern... the page can get its representation in a such a community based site, or be an alternative to it. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Symbology/styles exchange
RAVI KUMAR ha scritto: Hi, symbology is of particular significance for Geologists. Orientation (Rotation) of symbols and labelling through attribute table are essential. OpenJUMP user list has made great contribution towards this. Wish to know if any other Open GIS has similar resources. Any software using SLD should be able to rotate symbols, at least point ones. GeoServer does for example, I think MapServer does too. But maybe you're not referring to simple points? Can you provide more details? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Symbology/styles exchange
Lorenzo Becchi ha scritto: Andrea Aime wrote: ... Well, personally I don't have much time, but the idea is engaging. What I would like to see in such a platform is: - easy to get into it. Register and contribute - have some focus on the contribution license, it is important that whoever shares decides how others can reuse his work - peer review (voting system) - comments, possibly treaded - a discussion on each contribution - forum, where people can discuss map making more in general - visual, everything we talk about (style, symbols, softwares, data) should be accompained by at least one screenshot, the screenshot should appear in all listings - categorized, so that if I'm interested in symbols I know where to go... maybe we more than one way to categorize stuff, think point symbols vs fills but also geology vs road maps AFAIK, with a little customization (or maybe not) of Wordpress [1] you can do them all. Doh, interesting, and I thought it was for blog posts only... do you have some reference in mind, like one or more example sites I can look at? Do you know any site made with wordpress that has this kde-looks ability to show the most interesting items by category with a screenshot, title and short description? (the visual component is key to such a site). Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G2008 conference materials
Gavin Fleming ha scritto: Perfect timing Eduardo There was a permissions bug on the FOSS4G website hosted by OSGeo that was fixed only last week. Many presentations have since been uploaded and we hope to have all of them available soon, along with some of the materials from workshops and labs. Hi Gavin, thanks a lot for the work, I'm definitely looking forward to read about all the interesting presentations that I've missed (busy schedule, could not be everywhere ;) ). I was looking in this page http://conference.osgeo.org/index.php/foss4g/2008/schedConf/presentations and I see materials for, say, 3 presentations only? When you say uploaded I should not read published, or am I just looking in the wrong place? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Time window request on OGC protocol?
Domenico Febbo ha scritto: Hi all, maybe it is a very newbies' question: I need to implement a Web Service based on GML that accept a XML request with two main things consist of: 1) WGS84 coordinates for a geographical area 2) the timeframe (start time and stop time) used to query to the geodatabase historical data. It was very usefull (for me) to implement a web service over the WFS protocol or other OGC standard protol, but I didin't found a clear solution. WFS does not have a TIME parameter like WMS has, yet you can just publish the time attributes as part of your feature type, and create an OGC filter in your WFS request to filter upon them. For the details, I suggest you have a look at the WFS 1.0 specification and at the Filter 1.0 specification (available at the OGC site), they are a dry read but should allow you to setup the request you're looking for. Cheers Andrea ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Origins Of OpenJUMP
Richard Greenwood ha scritto: Landon, Thanks for taking the time to provide the detailed background on on the Jump family tree. Seems to me like the Java 'tribe' is a bit more fractured than the C 'tribe'. I guess it can't be helped... the C tribe has usually one way of doing things, that is, keep everything very simple and straight. The language being quite unforgiving, you have no room for fancy implementations. The same unforgiveness pushes people togheter: writing a working implementation (one that does the job without segfaults) it's hard, so the idea of redoing stuff in a way you like better is probably considered completely foolish. Or maybe it's just my narrow view of the subject coming from a Java programmer that escaped C because it was just too darn hard to code using C tools ;) Cheers Andrea ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
