Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] What happened to planet.osgeo.org?
Il 2013-11-24 18:48 Andrea Aime ha scritto: Hi, is it just me, or the blog aggregator at planet.osgeo.org [1] has been down for a few days now? http://planet.osgeo.org/ [2] Wondering what's happening? I haven't seen announcements of it being taken down, or moved. It's been worked on, see http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/2013-November/004750.html Ciao -steko ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Would you be concerned if the GeoServices REST API became an OGC standard?
Il 04/05/2013 18:43, Adrian Custer ha scritto: Which brings us to OSGeo and what useful contribution it could make to the debate. Simply rehashing the issues above is not going to be useful to anyone. If new ideas arise, or a large, common position emerges on the issue, I'd be glad to inject them into the OGC discussion. I suspect there is at least a week before voting resumes, although the rules going forwards are not yet clear. Adrian, your overview is very helpful. From where I stand, there are three reasons to push for a no to the proposed standard, all touched in your or Cameron's message: 1. disrespect for an existing, widespread, appreciated standard: GeoJSON 2. no open source reference implementation 3. vote was already suspended multiple times, showing a lack of agreement about this standard Points 1 and 2 are part of the OSGeo mission IMHO. Thank you steko -- Stefano Costa http://steko.iosa.it/ ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] Conservancy Launches Fundraising Campaign for Non-Profit Accounting Software
Hello, saw this and I think it may be of interest for OSGeo. If we can, we should help them. Full details here http://sfconservancy.org/news/2013/may/01/npo-accounting/ Software Freedom Conservancy announced today a fundraising campaign for an Open Source and Free Software non-profit accounting system. The campaign seeks to raise US$75,000 to fund a full-time developer for one year to first reevaluate existing Free Software solutions for their viability as a non-profit accounting system, and then improve and augment the best available system to create a new solution that will help non-profits around the world manage their finances better. Software Freedom Conservancy, a not-for-profit organization that helps promote, improve, develop and defend Free, Libre and Open Source software projects Ciao steko -- Stefano Costa http://steko.iosa.it/ ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo as organization at Ohloh?
Il 01/03/2013 21:01, Markus Neteler ha scritto: On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 01/03/2013 03:36, Cameron Shorter ha scritto: Mateusz, A few months back I did some ground work into sourcing stats for the OSGeo-Live project. This information still needs to be cleaned up (get a full list of projects, make sure we are sourcing correct data, etc), but it probably would be a good starting point for you. http://live.osgeo.org/en/metrics.html Hi Cameron, thanks for that. A few notes: * http://www.ohloh.net/p/qgis should be removed; the good one is http://www.ohloh.net/p/3663 * http://www.ohloh.net/p/grass_gis is missing. The GRASS GIS URL I have fixed in trunk, r10051. The QGIS dupe removed in trunk, r10052. https://www.ohloh.net/p/spatialite is not in good shape. Sadly, Fossil is not on the list of available version control systems at Ohloh. steko ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] pycsw Receives OGC Compliance Certification and Reference Implementation Status
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Il 14/01/2013 22:57, Angelos Tzotsos ha scritto: 14 January 2013 The pycsw development team is happy to announce that pycsw 1.4.0 is now certified OGC Compliant for OGC CSW 2.0.2 [1], and passes all 103 CITE tests. As well, pycsw is now an official OGC Reference Implementation. A demonstration instance of the reference implementation is available at http://demo.pycsw.org. Congratulations Angelos and all the pycsw developers! steko -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQ9HG1AAoJEDBz7sDeHMxYkAAP/2c5XamTXJ2x4pHS64eZ4zVZ wH1FmFgIxwJ9WUWKk+3OlKbO4FYArkfVOw3h3OfX1lyez80fO9JUSjI1oZX5uM32 SdJDuRr57VELnsg4skZ45zkxNtTmwOKUoh9KSr6WrxRnvk0D1ce7IS8Xkdqyr24c xPrDHGym59dF+YWKEUrvQdq0p49lpcnOB9oRHrWalXwLpXP7DAJgsO1ZAy/o1TzY 8KHMJEJ+T0YhPUgKWmx0hZdDVEq5ZBhuFwpjE6/jDEXGW1gg26r5+1TRcb7ImeQu lpY2WKLlAj2NmqQmU2h/O6yjZm/7/6LRS9ndQZ2hc9pW7w/CiCvegI4oa8TglMVS nqWmGcfFU5I6+RaejgeIADvaRf1ys6jmy+8W4OzCcr1t0JeRxiDaFtAAcI+Ehorn ZrWtGI9ZluwkAuoMxQed7npfmKovVQU6vwXUTWpaPLq83mJDI2E2FPs9MfcLk5jQ sP6Ih4wn3fL6sHc0+F2oOtefS9AV6/51rGeunEKeELvgIU/duz0q+Md6EE+1XJLb F8t3jA5QFZGMoaCxQPLO2exBGGNzhn/hYcnlDVWa+5UoVknwvW4/OKeWA9HjImSS tar033QC5n+TlQmceC/TPSoJ9O2ZGIRo3l/Tq5vAq17sJiK5pLQNXsPy0rRLFDsn /NBtUPInJjQKZXVmoPMX =AK0x -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo Journal: Request for Volume 12
Il 10/11/2012 00:25, Landon Blake ha scritto: I don't think I ever made the request for peer review articles for Volume 12 of the OSGeo Journal on this list. You can find the request here: Hi Landon, a quick question. I read that The article topic should be related to research on the development and use of geospatial software. but no mention of open source software is made. Does this mean that e.g. I could submit a paper about the research involved with the development of a proprietary program or library? If not, it may be better to state it clearly. And yes I agree with Anne about the deadline. Thanks steko ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Supporting Standards
Il 07/09/2012 02:49, Michael P. Gerlek ha scritto: [added standards mailing list back to the distribution list] Quoting all of item 4, to put Stefano's quote in context: Standards specifications are made accessible to all for implementation and deployment. Affirming standards organizations have defined procedures to develop specifications that can be implemented under fair terms. Given market diversity, fair terms may vary from royalty-free to fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms (FRAND). I'm pretty pragmatic about this stuff, so I see this as a perfectly reasonable position for an organization to take. Two months have passed since this last comment by Michael. I was wondering if any decision has been taken about this? It may be also useful to look at this MoU http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Open_Source_and_Open_Standards where no mention of FRAND is found (quite the opposite I would say). Ciao steko ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Nomination for Venkatesh Raghavan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Il 18/09/2012 13:51, nicolas bozon ha scritto: He is the best OSGeo advocate i know so far. Regardless of the strong merits of Venkatesh (I don't know you personally, but I do agree with others about your exceptional contribution to the community), I wonder if it is really OK to have a public thumbs up session for candidates rather than leave it to the committee to decide. Especially towards other potential candidates (there may even be others candidates already, AFAIK, since e-mails have to be submitted to a separate, private address and not to the discussion list). If this sounds over-bureaucratisation of our community standards, I apologise in advance. Cheers, steko -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQWICLAAoJEDBz7sDeHMxYyO4P/3ox0/EAhjQsW1fLX+inYO+x I9sk6zMAQc4aqlcZDwd4yuDs6IWUDwnYAf7+xngy55FpnbvLGOCoQtBkDACSPjKb ek+eozJhBDDL17ObvXEdalc0gHazZOkDq1G724k20Xj2XTPONyEI3nnCtYwPlWmY ALtff3U3j123tYTHDTCv3dQnQjpe+9Gef2RtjoU1n3bA7JV1gcyLemG7ogx/jK+H U1qH37rUqUu3F8zmjZE8pu/BKb3vUaylOEl+J9cApM9DmeegWMuHu2wcrMQKM0Vm SSLheAoCL+ojfzld6kAjI+GcchAvBVhYwKJgezGqIs2NN6tPIu+ufjJI1htebqpX WQzXaVPCVH0KRCLJKnp/tvt6AVnqxUTzDONjmVhyNpycznxjHEEgk6dWSHbU1RUv i63Yekhpam7ApoNJprt4nZesKoztkstvU8wN78FN4t7d8YEjPPqCENgLvjvGpWVO 86AQnXv8yUIserQqJaQFKvaAZciqfRTbJkYesymDPKrma0j2zioSg6J6HMZN77hu h1GFGS6hAkLQDKtfL4x/zhXrAwtnPYwB8uysU1EfvV4SbxXzlawVy6ZFRFwrtFOf 1wcbzQ+w4sNSrAmgkXmVnlS0rVNM/qK/WrJtYuInmMFuH+AJADHEBtCAz6QvYYm2 LaMG5i9+1Q/+oMkT8ceP =n3Tv -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Supporting Standards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Il 06/09/2012 17:26, Seven (aka Arnulf) ha scritto: Folks, one item on the OGC Architecture Board meeting agenda today was to look at this web site: http://open-stand.org/principles/ - From my perspective the principles listed here are very much aligned with our goals and nicely worded. So my suggestion is to support this initiative as an organization [1]. Let's have a dialog here and if we come to the conclusion that we want to officially endorse this submit a motion to the board for their next meeting. I'm a bit worried by the vague wording of those principles. More in detail, point 4 is crucial, stating that: fair terms may vary from royalty-free to fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms (FRAND). See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#RAND for some background of why this is problematic for free and open source software (our mission, I believe). Ciao steko -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQSMbAAAoJEDBz7sDeHMxYmdMP/RKaJVCdeYp9JV87uG7B7cev iOxF2nNt8G3Jhc+Yd4G3riiMxs+RTKiA1aDAjKnpuo3udBTTcVuuwB02b9oVKikX hb178cFC3vI0AAKAmMeOZEXpMF74L8H6IOwrz4XxaOesYxjL/Cxx59GeNO//pSIb zC0PvYI1lharjaLNKFLG1/dkobFEq6/6Qj6iTRPpOCryGcXwg95H4sWdP2mK+Cyr MD43/ycHag2GpWoYrov4OxjX6MSQnFYSs9H6pkibEQAMYz3PxSiCpdxNSjrp+uk5 6L9wbOeWLW2tJJcFZSkzxa7GZrwrKsyzSS8+TAsPHs556HCkqQNHIzwDlKLVzZa2 Y32CaLVqrhSoP4k6xvw+B3ZbcvQ+nz5yaxt7Q/Kue0+rEepmcdduoIultv48Y9dI +8mgHGl5TFpeB2Y6JeiqlokcJw7uflZxUFYflgylkwn34C1x3qSvk9VdFfdL8pII 3ErbAWLOmKAcT44+7Q4O6ubacrLLJhLzhkbuvOWscBDGMTr5SsGHjPYmwOHhW707 kUQ6rKZfVWcmCYX6ip7RhM52HMKxpVcFwucCNzsn+f+cIEzsIgplO+ymgjOcparF vPMmZy4SauRZBtpZkiOEAxy5y2/jd2xQyWbAZQrarqJ6gwULdb/hyO5jmomVmBnh zBkMdeA3tLCyxI52CQjO =vBan -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Fwd: Board elections Voting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Il 24/07/2012 19:30, Ravi Kumar ha scritto: But now I feel this reduces the chances of voting to a worthy member competing for the board. At the same time it might be rude not voting to any other if he feels that he might reduce the chances of (his) the chosen one. Hope the present charter will react to this. Why not something like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulze_method as used by the Debian project? Incidentally, this could be used for other voting purposes, too. Ciao, steko -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQDuB+AAoJEDBz7sDeHMxY4lgP/3NAK/MOfaKcpTed25Obtxd1 7uCiw4qJIaVILy9pOcDeFCFRC56rt7C95GnkiLy1FZLmCYPOrPaSjJ3XDQW6yxgF 4WKPlMb1SIr/syesF2EnMHUQedBFYf6yOInF230fLGA4MaOLRr7anHNEglRkO6ix UXU8kIdKwkDbIT503J7Pos2KRM/I6+pAr2zP9qsq/94aIO+gYkKsHxqbH3yk69lU EuBtqNfq1qdUN3IijuqmwMqX8knoqi+WABAgahHkYQgS3h4ck4P5I6b9nXSiGsVf 4muS5F/RZgnA1FncJHdw52QsWgzqyOFDJXUlmezRrmc+1lDHIMl8QIuLvT0TeJ5A YQROeC9wkX1CPBJt3fxlgQYuoQZ/y8+0C4aXRxA84mdj5z4l62HGfi6u6+KzQxvU c4gFpBkNN7GpjeCRkCgUdJEW+NtFojyGaKO6LEJvVAcLklPy8z4hahv4+yWmDcT4 SfFWiByUkeX8lTrfSDpd5UiPaYf/Cjixcs9YQeV41mT10i9JMvHy6D8KTwUlODR+ MJezvS8e+V3byrJsFUkgJvK46JuAuoKO9hzjItB6W5EzyZ2r9VKeTQ2VqEnDVTAE duxrRkL3piEzbvT2W6wq6tPQcHjJWcloLkD3RlEOhXBytlc8bxjMUCvd3lMOk06I dY4OlT4/FwphS35Tj5TZ =FGDp -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Charter Member nomination - Angelos Tzotsos
Il 23/06/2012 04:57, Cameron Shorter ha scritto: I'd like to nominate Angelos Tzotsos as an OSGeo Charter member, as I believe he exemplifies many of the key qualities we look for in OSGeo Advocates. I would like to join Cameron in this nomination. I met Angelos in Athens a few weeks ago and we had a long conversation, that gave me an opportunity to learn more about the B-side of his outstanding contribution to OSGeo (the A-side being software development, translations and OSGeo Live): the Greek OSGeo community. As I made already clear a few days ago, I believe it is very important to facilitate the growth of new, strong communities where they are still missing. In a way, nominating Angelos is for me a way to support the activity that he and his fellow Greek OSGeo members are already carrying on, showing that OSGeo cares globally about local initiatives as much as the local communities care about global developments (again, software). Finally, Angelos was among the first ones to show an interest in Total Open Station, the software I develop with others. Far from being led by personal excitement, I see this interest towards the world of surveying as a first step towards one of the most promising developments OSGeo may and should achieve, namely being able to provide a complete software (and hardware?) stack for surveying. Thank you all for reading this e-mail. Ciao steko ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] regional conferences
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Il 16/06/2012 18:34, nicolas bozon ha scritto: Such a Mediterannean regional event could may be gather italin, greek, spanish and french local chapters, and may be others. Actually, as most closed seas do, the Mediterranean has countries all around it, not only on the Northern side :-) I was raising this very idea only a few days ago on the mailing list of GFOSS.it, the Italian OSGeo chapter (specifically referring to Greece, because that's where I am now). There was some consensus among members. The point IMHO is not to gather again the same people who would meet anyway at any international event (FOSS4G Barcelona was only in 2010, by the way). We should try and support the creation of new chapters where they are still missing (of course this is true globally, not just for the Mediterranean). my 2¢ - ciao, steko -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP3LAnAAoJEDBz7sDeHMxYfpgP/2d0q6hTMMzuigq4mQHESfVm t0lq4c72Z1sf+PfpuScH6z81j5BvxKyAdgLBxzyO5cO9jGMaowj+tinY1ZWpzli8 dWHHJec2/XcUHl40YHomUh2r6CnqFFiUYp2nfdGnssLNb1FVUh0+drVamNKnyXwU f+elwc1AKPkDo6v+hYZd0M4QisTm+0VyUuMyA3YKZmUdqO6aa66KkSHUEiyWFz30 5V810CZgHnClYctBI2ryJKi+e1lHT8Wjt5jiRqE3x/9OH+kgLiGoUJqleThUquoQ YaFNix/ZfCFL/ofIr22kOssgzk43yJezymAzJPVtmweZyOwrqAA+tMF4R85s1Lsp 85RzB6Eu6GzLZLQAjDFpNszMjXxPd8MgsT3r82F4xHmaRh/FbZB1r/f3jLQd4G84 J9/s8u8ulakqAh+fSvH39GrZ7edwgBoI9EUSUe3Ol4BX7O5nVBZXjv3T7mXexVnz 9VEPg7FXzqWlNu1Hk1ZsZ6gN/UWqWE7DgzzrImKtP56jMZ0P91b4ECznpeHtk0iG 36epvNmyEmBnTWfCtwVw8sFRH2NKoEX/ERkTdg784yrQy/cCXMJSuvoCIwKsrF6z eqGitpy4BDK5nyOBMylmFN8kzT/p6IuJYXIKRXMBSZo/jvevwoYM7xX0c0EkKpz0 T3qf+6SMzxPD7Xe1aF+b =1eYJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Xlink 1.1 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Il 24/04/2012 12:22, Bruce Bannerman ha scritto: Please note Carl Reed’s blog on OGC’s policy and timeline to move to Xlink 1.1: Quoting from Reed's blog: Concurrently, we need aggressive OUTREACH, OUTREACH, OUTREACH to inform and educate the implementation and user community. For example, we need to: Coordinate with TC 211 Coordinate with OASIS Coordinate with the GeoSciML community Coordinate with INSPIRE Inform all technology developers that they need to check their offerings and determine what (if any) changes they need to make. Not just OGC Members but the whole community! Coordinate with the Open Source community also ... I cannot but ask myself: WTF?? First OGC takes a disruptive decision, IIUC this is changing the existing standards without issuing a new version of them (or, if this is not the case, Mr. Reed needs to rephrase heavily its writing), and then they realise OUTREACH, OUTREACH, OUTREACH is needed? Why the need to hurry everyone? Is this even how a serious standards organisation works? Ciao, steko ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Xlink 1.1 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Il 24/04/2012 12:42, Stefano Costa ha scritto: ... I cannot but ask myself: WTF?? First OGC takes a disruptive decision, IIUC this is changing the existing standards without issuing a new version of them (or, if this is not the case, Mr. Reed needs to rephrase heavily its writing), and then they realise OUTREACH, OUTREACH, OUTREACH is needed? Why the need to hurry everyone? Is this even how a serious standards organisation works? And most importantly, with apologies for the harsh tone of my previous e-mail: - what is the rationale for this change? Thanks steko ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Defining an OSGeo Ambassador role
Il 21/04/2012 12:28, Jody Garnett ha scritto: I would hope that our charter members (who have been through a public nomination process in part for their involvement) are already acting in the capacity of Ambassador for OSGeo. I totally agree on this point. The fact that charter members only official role is to nominate new charter members and the Board is IMHO a weakness. Their role as OSGeo champions (and Ambassadors if there's consensus on that) should be emphasised. Quick ideas: - personal pages on osgeo.org (osgeo.org/members/johndoe) - @osgeo.org e-mail address (even an alias is fine) to be used as their primary address - interviews on the main blog - a track record of their public activity wrt OSGeo promotion, software development, management, documentation and what else In this way the charter members could gain a higher visibility in the wider geospatial community and be recognised as official representatives. Ciao steko BTW is there any process in place to remove charter members if they become inactive, move to another planet or are deemed unfit for the purpose by the community? ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] Total Open Station 0.3 released!
Total Open Station 0.3 was released today! What is Total Open Station? Total Open Station (TOPS for friends) is a free software program for downloading and processing data from total station devices. If you don't know what a total station is, please read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_station to get an idea. The task of managing survey data is usually done by proprietary, dedicated and Windows™-only software, but TOPS is different by nature, because: * it is free software released under the GNU GPLv3 license; * it works on any operating system, including some mobile platforms (OpenMoko); * it is designed to support as many devices and formats as possible, all within the same program, opposed to having one program per device. Total Open Station is available as a Python source install for GNU/Linux and other UNIX systems (possibly including Mac OSX, feedback welcome), and as a binary installer for Microsoft Windows. Downloads and install instructions at http://tops.iosa.it/installing.html TOPS 0.3 is our first official release, and already has support for different input formats (there are lots of them out there). More formats will be supported in next releases, and user feedback is essential. Total Open Station is developed within the IOSA Project, and is written in Python. The website and documentation is at http://tops.iosa.it/ if you want to find out how to contribute or read more detailed documentation. Ciao, Stefano ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[OSGeo-Discuss] EU PSI Directive Survey - an OSGeo EU collaboration?
Dear all, I would like to ask for collaboration in filling this online survey http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/ipm/forms/dispatch?form=psidirective2010 by the European Commission about Public Sector Information (which includes geodata). Rather than filling the survey as individuals, it could be more meaningful to compile a compound survey based on input from all European OSGeo members and chapters. This would give more weight IMHO. I have copied all the questions on this wiki page: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/EU_PSI_Directive_Survey and it should be quite easy to insert answers below each one. The deadline is 30th November, please let me know if you want to help with this task and whether it is OK or not to send the questionnaire as OSGeo rather than as individuals. All the best steko PS I'm not subscribed to this ML, please CC me -- Stefano Costa http://www.iosa.it/ Open Archaeology ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
