Re: [slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-05 Thread pablolie

kdf;513375 Wrote: 
 both devices are supported if run as a server on a PC.  They are not
 supported when run as tinySBS on the touch device.  This is due to
 additional overhead in the protocol for these devices..[

In 4 words: they are too slim...!? :-)

It's fascinating because back in 2005 0r 2006 there were passionate
religious discussions about the need to keep devices as slim and dumb as
possible, while others talked about the fancy UI limitations that
imposed. 

And now we have similar discussions about adding better settings backup
functionality for these smarter devices. :-) 

Moore's Law always gets us into these paradigm shifts. :-)


-- 
pablolie

...pablo
Server: Shuttle X27D - Ubuntu 8.04LTS - SBS 7.4.1
Sources: SB3 (3), SB Boom (3), Duet (1), Radio (1), Accuphase DP65v CD
(used as DAC mostly)
Amplifiers: Accuphase E306v - Creek OBH21/22
Loudspeakers: Ceeroy 3-way tower (tuned) - Audioengine 5/S8 - Acoustic
Energy Aego M
Headphones: Grado SR-1

pablolie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3816
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74847

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-04 Thread indifference_engine

mherger;513523 Wrote: 
  No. As kdf said in his post, 7.5-embedded is _not_ the same thing as
  TinySC.
 
 What we refer to as TinySC/TinySBS is just one configuration of the
 embedded code. It's the configuration used on SB Touch which disables a
 few memory intensive features using startup parameters.
 
 You can make any embedded installation a TinySBS by adding those
 parameters. The code of the two is the same.
 
 -- 
 
 Michael

Is it possible to turn off those memory intensive features on the
regular SBS to save resources if I don't have anything older than an
SB3?


-- 
indifference_engine

indifference_engine's Profile: 
http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20698
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74847

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-04 Thread Michael Herger
 You can make any embedded installation a TinySBS by adding those
 parameters. The code of the two is the same.

 Is it possible to turn off those memory intensive features on the
 regular SBS to save resources if I don't have anything older than an
 SB3?

Yes, that's exactly what I wanted to say with the above paragraph :-). Those 
parameters will be available to any SBS installation running the embedded 
branch (or the future 7.6 or whatever it'll be called)
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-04 Thread forestcaver

Just to be really, really clear :-) I think I understand the position
now - is this right:

1) There is a rearchitecture of the server to allow a smaller
footprint, that supports SB1 and slimp3.
2) This allows an install on the touch, that disables support for SB1
and slimp3 due to memory limitations on the touch.
3) This branch will be merged back to the main stream soon and then the
server install (not on the touch) will allow a configurable smaller
footprint that still supports SB1 and slimp3 on, for example, NAS
boxes.

Sorry to labour the point, I am just trying to make sure I understand.

Thanks for all the replies so far...

Cheers,
Andy


-- 
forestcaver

forestcaver's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3550
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74847

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-03 Thread forestcaver

I notice that the server software for the touch is not going to support
either the slimp3 or the squeezebox1 - are logitech phasing out support
for older hardware versions ? If so, this will clearly influence my
buying decision - I was planning on buying new hardware (probably a
touch, as and when it is available), but would be inclined to not bother
if logitech are dropping their support
(I searched on the site but could find no information - does anyone
know ?)

Cheers,
Andy


-- 
forestcaver

forestcaver's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3550
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74847

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-03 Thread ChrisOwens

If the older players are not working with 7.5.0, please make sure
there's a bug on that.  There is no plan to remove support!


-- 
ChrisOwens

Christopher Owens
QA Manager
chris_ow...@logitech.com

ChrisOwens's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4240
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74847

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-03 Thread forestcaver

Thanks Chris - that's reassuring. Does that apply to the server software
that will run *on* the touch, tinySC ?
Also, are you planning on releasing the stripped down server software
to the community to allow installs on, for example, NAS devices or other
small devices ?

Cheers,
Andy


-- 
forestcaver

forestcaver's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3550
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74847

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-03 Thread andyg

TinySBS can't support SB1 or Slimp3.  If you have those devices, run the
normal server as you have already been doing for years. :)

You can download the embedded version here:
http://downloads.slimdevices.com/nightly/?ver=7.5-embedded


-- 
andyg

andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74847

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-03 Thread ftlight

andyg;513324 Wrote: 
 
 
 You can download the embedded version here:
 http://downloads.slimdevices.com/nightly/?ver=7.5-embedded

What's the difference between the regular and embedded versions of
7.5?

Bill


-- 
ftlight

ftlight's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5294
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74847

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-03 Thread andyg

See http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/Nightly_Builds


-- 
andyg

andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74847

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-03 Thread aubuti

Hey, thanks to whoever edited that wiki page to include the link and
blurb for 7.5-embedded. That was needed.


-- 
aubuti

aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2074
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74847

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-03 Thread forestcaver

Are there any plans to support slimp3 and sb1 in the embedded? Or are
there technical reasons why they will never be supported?

Cheers,
andy


-- 
forestcaver

forestcaver's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3550
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74847

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-03 Thread kdf
both devices are supported if run as a server on a PC.  They are not
supported when run as tinySBS on the touch device.  This is due to
additional overhead in the protocol for these devices.  The embedded
branch can be run in a mode for a full server or for use on the Touch. 
The term embedded is used to reflect the focus but not the limitation.

 Are there any plans to support slimp3 and sb1 in the embedded? Or are
 there technical reasons why they will never be supported?


___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-03 Thread bhaagensen

So 7.5 embedded aka. TinySC will not support SLIMp3 nor SB1. The
wiki-page says that 7.5 embedded will eventually be merged with the
mainline code. Does that imply that SLIMp3/SB1 support will be dropped
as of that version?


-- 
bhaagensen

bhaagensen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7418
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74847

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-03 Thread aubuti

bhaagensen;513392 Wrote: 
 So 7.5 embedded aka. TinySC will not support SLIMp3 nor SB1. The
 wiki-page says that 7.5 embedded will eventually be merged with the
 mainline code. Does that imply that SLIMp3/SB1 support will be dropped
 as of that version?
No. As kdf said in his post, 7.5-embedded is _not_ the same thing as
TinySC. 7.5-embedded supports SliMP3/SB1 if it is run on a regular
server (pc or NAS). The only limitation with respect to SliMP3/SB1 is if
it is run on the Touch.


-- 
aubuti

aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2074
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74847

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-03 Thread bhaagensen

aubuti: I missed that... somehow. Thanks.


-- 
bhaagensen

bhaagensen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7418
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74847

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-03 Thread Michael Herger
 No. As kdf said in his post, 7.5-embedded is _not_ the same thing as
 TinySC.

What we refer to as TinySC/TinySBS is just one configuration of the embedded 
code. It's the configuration used on SB Touch which disables a few memory 
intensive features using startup parameters.

You can make any embedded installation a TinySBS by adding those parameters. 
The code of the two is the same.

-- 

Michael
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Dropping support for previous hardware ?

2010-02-03 Thread JJZolx

Wouldn't labeling the embedded branch 7.6 end some of the confusion over
the terms 'embedded' and 'TinySC'?  I don't know if the branching model
supports this, before 7.5 is officially released, but I think it would
make things simpler for everyone involved.


-- 
JJZolx

Jim

JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=74847

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss