Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
cliveb;438604 Wrote: > Having seen the picture of your modded TP, I'd respectfully suggest that > the handles are no longer the determining factor in its ugliness. :-) > > > Really? I think the tube output stage with the EML 5U4G is a thing of > beauty..., but I guess taste varies. Sonically, the Modwright unit is > beautiful for sure :) -- deutscherhififan Primary: QNAP TS109II > BPT CPC > Modwright Platinum Signature 'Truth' Transporter with 6N30P DR 'Super Tubes' + EML 5U4G Mesh or Oppo BDP-83 > Maxxed Woo Audio WA2 with TungSol 5998's, Amperez Bugleboy 6DJ7's, and Mullard EZ80's > Audio Mirror 45W SET Monoblocks > Piega P4XL II + Piega PSub4. AKG K701 Headphones, all Kimber cables Secondary: Monster Signature Power Conditioner > Duet > Beresford 7520 DAC > Vista Audio i34 Integrated Tube Amp > Epos M5 Speakers + sub deutscherhififan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23272 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
deutscherhififan;438219 Wrote: > I was also thinking about the 'ugly factor' of the handles, but my > modded unit now weighs over 20 pounds and they do come in handy when > moving the unit around in tight spaces. Having seen the picture of your modded TP, I'd respectfully suggest that the handles are no longer the determining factor in its ugliness. :-) deutscherhififan;438219 Wrote: > Does anyone have issues when using a SBC with the transporter? It seems > like the two don't like each other and eventually the SBC just refuses > to connect to the transporter. I've been using an SBC with my Transporter for ages now, and never had a problem. Which doesn't help you, of course, but at least you know they can be made to work together. -- cliveb Transporter -> ATC SCM100A cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
iPhone;438426 Wrote: > That is all the more reason in my mind to have a separate Transporter > Section, especially since back about a year ago the under header for the > Audiophile section was changed to: "Know everything about Pear Cables > v.s. The Amazing Randi? This is your forum." > > Who wants the Transporter associated with that? Totally agree. It makes no sense that the flagship in the product line up has to squeeze in some other place. And yes, that's a dumb title for the audiophile section. -- deutscherhififan Primary: QNAP TS109II > BPT CPC > Modwright Platinum Signature 'Truth' Transporter with 6N30P DR 'Super Tubes' + EML 5U4G Mesh or Oppo BDP-83 > Maxxed Woo Audio WA2 with TungSol 5998's, Amperez Bugleboy 6DJ7's, and Mullard EZ80's > Audio Mirror 45W SET Monoblocks > Piega P4XL II + Piega PSub4. AKG K701 Headphones, all Kimber cables Secondary: Monster Signature Power Conditioner > Duet > Beresford 7520 DAC > Vista Audio i34 Integrated Tube Amp > Epos M5 Speakers + sub deutscherhififan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23272 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
Phil Leigh;438338 Wrote: > I would hope that it would be downsampled to 24/96 by SOX? That's what I was thinkinganyone know for certain? -- SamS SamS's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9261 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
radish;438064 Wrote: > The Audiophiles forum also typically serves as a TP forum, although > obviously if you have questions about SC or SN they're best asked in > those forums. That is all the more reason in my mind to have a separate Transporter Section, especially since back about a year ago the under header for the Audiophile section was changed to: "Know everything about Pear Cables v.s. The Amazing Randi? This is your forum." Who wants the Transporter associated with that? -- iPhone *iPhone* Media Room: Transporter, VTL TL-6.5 Signature Pre-Amp, Ayre MX-R Mono's, VeraStarr 6.4SE 6-channel Amp, Vandersteen Speakers: Quatro Mains, VCC-5 Reference Center, four VSM-1 Signatures, Video: Runco RS 900 CineWide AutoScope 2.35:1 Living Room: Duet, ADCOM GTP-870HD, Cinepro 3K6SE III Gold, Vandersteen Model 3A Signature, Two 2Wq subs, VCC-2, Two VSM-1 Kitchen: Squeezebox BOOM Bedroom: SB3, GFR-700HD, Thiel 2.3, Second Boom Home Office: SB3, NAD C370, two VSM-1 Home Gym: SB3, Parasound Vamp v.3, Thiel PowerPoint 1.2 House Portable: SB3, Audioengine A5 Ford Thunderbird: Duet, Mac Mini Ford Expedition: SB3, ToughBook iPhone's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13622 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
SamS;438336 Wrote: > What happens if you feed a Transporter a 24/192 FLAC file? I would hope that it would be downsampled to 24/96 by SOX? -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... SB3 (wired) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W - MF Triplethreat(Audiocom full mods) - Linn 5103 - Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Townsend Supertweeters, Blue Jeans Digital,Kimber Speaker & Chord Interconnect cables Outdoors: Boom Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
What happens if you feed a Transporter a 24/192 FLAC file? -- SamS SamS's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9261 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
deutscherhififan;438219 Wrote: > > Does anyone have issues when using a SBC with the transporter? It seems > like the two don't like each other and eventually the SBC just refuses > to connect to the transporter. The transporter's control freeze when > trying to control it with the SBC. It's fine as I have a universal > remote control for my primary system, but still a little annoying. I use an SBC with my Transporter all the time, no issues. Which makes sense, the SBC has very little clue as to what kind of player it's controlling, I can't imagine how it could be less reliable with one kind than another. -- radish http://www.last.fm/user/polymeric radish's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=77 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
iPhone;438293 Wrote: > > Oh, just realized and forgot this wasn't the Audiophile Forum. I am > obviously just joking. But seriously, I don't believe Logitech is going > to void your warranty for removing the handles as I believe the top has > to come off to install the rack mount kit. Safe bet is to email or call > support or if one is really paranoid wait 3 years until the warranty is > up. Or, if the need for a warrenty repair arises, take the top off again and put the handles back on - assuming you haven't throw them away :-) Bob -- bobertuk 1 x Duet - SC 7.3.4 - SSOTS v3.18 Lavry DA-10 DAC QNAP TS-509 3.1.0 build 0627T Starfish Pre-amp : Based on NAIM Heavily modified NAIM NAP 250 Power-amp Behringer DEQ2496 Linn Isobarik DMS bobertuk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=30376 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
Veggen;438284 Wrote: > Shit... > I'll have to open mine and check the length right now. > Does the hardness of the steel matter, mine are 8.8 I think. > Hope the fidelity is'nt lost forever. > Tell me there is still hope, please... Hey maybe somebody in Admin could start a Transporter Section and move the whole thread over there? Well if you have already taken the top off, you already let all the smoke out so what does it matter now?! Also removing the handles drastically affects the electro magnetic fields of the transformers and especially so in the ModWright with its toroidal transformer! . . . Oh, just realized and forgot this wasn't the Audiophile Forum. I am obviously just joking. But seriously, I don't believe Logitech is going to void your warranty for removing the handles as I believe the top has to come off to install the rack mount kit. Safe bet is to email or call support or if one is really paranoid wait 3 years until the warranty is up. -- iPhone *iPhone* Media Room: Transporter, VTL TL-6.5 Signature Pre-Amp, Ayre MX-R Mono's, VeraStarr 6.4SE 6-channel Amp, Vandersteen Speakers: Quatro Mains, VCC-5 Reference Center, four VSM-1 Signatures, Video: Runco RS 900 CineWide AutoScope 2.35:1 Living Room: Duet, ADCOM GTP-870HD, Cinepro 3K6SE III Gold, Vandersteen Model 3A Signature, Two 2Wq subs, VCC-2, Two VSM-1 Kitchen: Squeezebox BOOM Bedroom: SB3, GFR-700HD, Thiel 2.3, Second Boom Home Office: SB3, NAD C370, two VSM-1 Home Gym: SB3, Parasound Vamp v.3, Thiel PowerPoint 1.2 House Portable: SB3, Audioengine A5 Ford Thunderbird: Duet, Mac Mini Ford Expedition: SB3, ToughBook iPhone's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13622 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
Shit... I'll have to open mine and check the length right now. Does the hardness of the steel matter, mine are 8.8 I think. Hope the fidelity is'nt lost forever. Tell me there is still hope, please... -- Veggen Veggen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7035 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
Veggen wrote: > SamS;438228 Wrote: >> Thanks. Do you know approximately how long? > Not critical, half an inch or so, there is plenty of space. Oh no! They have to be exactly 3 mm hex head that are 10 mm long. Otherwise, you mess up the eddy currents inside the Transporter, and lose all the fidelity. Think of it as $1000 interconnect wires, they make a difference. ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
ghostrider;438227 Wrote: > I bought a stand-alone SBC to use with my Transporter and Boom. I don't > have any issues but I still run SC 7.2. The SBC, to me, seems flakey > after 7.3 and I don't need any of the functions that 7.3 provides, > espscially the SBC as a player. I am on 7.3.3, that could explain it. I have basically resigned to just using the SBC with the SBR in a second system. -- deutscherhififan Primary: QNAP TS109II > BPT CPC > Modwright Platinum Signature 'Truth' Transporter with 6N30P DR 'Super Tubes' + EML 5U4G Mesh or Oppo BDP-83 > Maxxed Woo Audio WA2 with TungSol 5998's, Amperez Bugleboy 6DJ7's, and Mullard EZ80's > Audio Mirror 45W SET Monoblocks > Piega P4XL II + Piega PSub4. AKG K701 Headphones, all Kimber cables Secondary: Monster Signature Power Conditioner > Duet > Beresford 7520 DAC > Vista Audio i34 Integrated Tube Amp > Epos M5 Speakers + sub deutscherhififan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23272 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
SamS;438228 Wrote: > Thanks. Do you know approximately how long? Not critical, half an inch or so, there is plenty of space. -- Veggen Veggen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7035 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
Thanks. Do you know approximately how long? -- SamS SamS's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9261 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
I bought a stand-alone SBC to use with my Transporter and Boom. I don't have any issues but I still run SC 7.2. The SBC, to me, seems flakey after 7.3 and I don't need any of the functions that 7.3 provides, espscially the SBC as a player. -- ghostrider ghostrider's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18959 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
SamS;438224 Wrote: > Do you recall the size of the allen bolts you used to plug the holes > and/or where you got them? They were just some I had lying around, I think they were M3 size, 1/8 inch will also do fine. -- Veggen Veggen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7035 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
Veggen;438213 Wrote: > I used some black allen head bolts to plug the holes. The holes are > recessed so that the head of the bolts are flush with the front plate. Do you recall the size of the allen bolts you used to plug the holes and/or where you got them? deutscherhififan;438219 Wrote: > > Does anyone have issues when using a SBC with the transporter? It seems > like the two don't like each other and eventually the SBC just refuses > to connect to the transporter. The transporter's control freeze when > trying to control it with the SBC. It's fine as I have a universal > remote control for my primary system, but still a little annoying. Oh don't say that. I have a SBC brand new in a box yesterday that came free with my Transporter. I was waiting a bit to set it up. -- SamS SamS's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9261 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
I was also thinking about the 'ugly factor' of the handles, but my modded unit now weighs over 20 pounds and they do come in handy when moving the unit around in tight spaces. Does anyone have issues when using a SBC with the transporter? It seems like the two don't like each other and eventually the SBC just refuses to connect to the transporter. The transporter's control freeze when trying to control it with the SBC. It's fine as I have a universal remote control for my primary system, but still a little annoying. +---+ |Filename: Modded pre and transporter0009 small.jpg | |Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=7748| +---+ -- deutscherhififan Primary: QNAP TS109II > BPT CPC > Modwright Platinum Signature 'Truth' Transporter with 6N30P DR 'Super Tubes' + EML 5U4G Mesh or Oppo BDP-83 > Maxxed Woo Audio WA2 with TungSol 5998's, Amperez Bugleboy 6DJ7's, and Mullard EZ80's > Audio Mirror 45W SET Monoblocks > Piega P4XL II + Piega PSub4. AKG K701 Headphones, all Kimber cables Secondary: Monster Signature Power Conditioner > Duet > Beresford 7520 DAC > Vista Audio i34 Integrated Tube Amp > Epos M5 Speakers + sub deutscherhififan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23272 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
SamS;438173 Wrote: > That looks nice. What did you cover the holes withe? Or is it just the > thread holes left? Hard to tell from the pic. I used some black allen head bolts to plug the holes. The holes are recessed so that the head of the bolts are flush with the front plate. -- Veggen Veggen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7035 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
Veggen;438120 Wrote: > I have done just that, it is quick and easy, a 10 minute job. > Just make sure you have the correct sized allen key to take off the > lid. It is pretty small, 1/16 or 5/64 inch I think. > Sorry about the picture quality, but you get the idea. That looks nice. What did you cover the holes withe? Or is it just the thread holes left? Hard to tell from the pic. -- SamS SamS's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9261 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
JJZolx;438086 Wrote: > You can probably do so if you take the unit apart. I've kicked around > the idea of removing them and replacing them with some type of black cap > bolt. I'm pretty sure Sean has said it wouldn't be a problem if you decided to do this in the past. There is also the Transporter Rack Mounting Kit, so presumably you need to take the lid off to install that. -- funkstar my collection: *1*x boom *2*x controller, *1*x receiver *2*x sb3 (sliver/black, *1*x sb2 wired (silver), *1*x sb (black) *1*x slimp3 (with rear shield) interested in any others if you have them! funkstar's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2335 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
JJZolx;438086 Wrote: > Quote:3) I wish we could take the handles off, it would look so much > nicer without them. > You can probably do so if you take the unit apart. I've kicked around > the idea of removing them and replacing them with some type of black cap > bolt. I have done just that, it is quick and easy, a 5 minute job. -- Veggen Veggen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7035 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
SamS;438056 Wrote: > > 2) When setting up the Player->Basic Settings in the SC Web UI, the > minimum time you can put the screensaver time to to is "1", whereas my > SB3 let's me put it to "0" so my MusicInfo SCR plugin kicks on > instantaneously. If you put the Transporter screensaver time to "0", it > will never kick on. I was wrong about the above. Both SB3 and Transporter need to have Screensaver timeout to "1" to work properly. JJZolx;438086 Wrote: > I never use the knob, but I believe it's intended so that you can 'feel' > the end of the list, but push through. I doubt that the magnetic > mechenism employed by the knob is capable of effecting a true hard stop. > Ah, gotcha. > > You can probably do so if you take the unit apart. I've kicked around > the idea of removing them and replacing them with some type of black cap > bolt. You try it first! -- SamS SamS's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9261 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
SamS;438056 Wrote: > Just some strange things I noticed: > > 1) The knob seems to "slip" a bit when it gets to the end of a list. > Not a hard stop, it's almost like it's a bit loose. I realize it's IC > controlled and doesn't work like a regular knob. It just has a > different sensation than what I was expecting. I never use the knob, but I believe it's intended so that you can 'feel' the end of the list, but push through. I doubt that the magnetic mechenism employed by the knob is capable of effecting a true hard stop. > 2) When setting up the Player->Basic Settings in the SC Web UI, the > minimum time you can put the screensaver time to to is "1", whereas my > SB3 let's me put it to "0" so my MusicInfo SCR plugin kicks on > instantaneously. If you put the Transporter screensaver time to "0", it > will never kick on. Dunno about that one. In my experience setting the screensaver timeout too low makes navigating difficult. > 3) I wish we could take the handles off, it would look so much nicer > without them. You can probably do so if you take the unit apart. I've kicked around the idea of removing them and replacing them with some type of black cap bolt. -- JJZolx Jim JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
The Audiophiles forum also typically serves as a TP forum, although obviously if you have questions about SC or SN they're best asked in those forums. -- radish http://www.last.fm/user/polymeric radish's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=77 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
Just some strange things I noticed: 1) The knob seems to "slip" a bit when it gets to the end of a list. Not a hard stop, it's almost like it's a bit loose. I realize it's IC controlled and doesn't work like a regular knob. It just has a different sensation than what I was expecting. 2) When setting up the Player->Basic Settings in the SC Web UI, the minimum time you can put the screensaver time to to is "1", whereas my SB3 let's me put it to "0" so my Music ISC plugin kicks on instantaneously. If you put the Transporter screensaver time to "0", it will never kick on. 3) I wish we could take the handles off, it would look so much nicer without them. 4) The sound is very nice. I haven't A/B'd it against my SB3+DAC, I just set it up in my office temporarily. But, the sound quality is definitely there. -- SamS SamS's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9261 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
SamS;438044 Wrote: > I dunno. It would be nice. I received my Transporter yesterday, and > have a few questions. What are your questions? I may be able to help. -- deutscherhififan Primary: QNAP TS109II > BPT CPC > Modwright Platinum Signature 'Truth' Transporter with 6N30P DR 'Super Tubes' + EML 5U4G Mesh or Oppo BDP-83 > Maxxed Woo Audio WA2 with TungSol 5998's, Amperez Bugleboy 6DJ7's, and Mullard EZ80's > Audio Mirror 45W SET Monoblocks > Piega P4XL II + Piega PSub4. AKG K701 Headphones, all Kimber cables Secondary: Monster Signature Power Conditioner > Duet > Beresford 7820 DAC > Vista Audio i34 Integrated Tube Amp > Epos M5 Speakers + sub deutscherhififan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23272 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
I dunno. It would be nice. I received my Transporter yesterday, and have a few questions. -- SamS SamS's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9261 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[slim] Why no Transporter Thread at the highest hierary level?
As the title says, I am wondering why there is no Transporter thread at the highest level. We got boom, duet, etc. As a transporter owner, it would be nice to be able to have a 'home' to go to for discussions affecting my Logitech product. -- deutscherhififan Primary: QNAP TS109II > BPT CPC > Modwright Platinum Signature 'Truth' Transporter with 6N30P DR 'Super Tubes' + EML 5U4G Mesh or Oppo BDP-83 > Maxxed Woo Audio WA2 with TungSol 5998's, Amperez Bugleboy 6DJ7's, and Mullard EZ80's > Audio Mirror 45W SET Monoblocks > Piega P4XL II + Piega PSub4. AKG K701 Headphones, all Kimber cables Secondary: Monster Signature Power Conditioner > Duet > Beresford 7820 DAC > Vista Audio i34 Integrated Tube Amp > Epos M5 Speakers + sub deutscherhififan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23272 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65280 ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss