Re: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-28 Thread Michael Peters
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:16:49 -0800, Pbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The point I was going to make, excatly.
> 
> However there is one more thing to note. Linspire also releases their
> code under GPL. So it is a give and take.
> 
> Slimserver guys should take a note of the lsongs application.
> 
> http://mp3beamer.com/ss_lsongs-syncing.html
> 
> This would make a pretty nice itunes replacement, and could be easily
> bundled with slimserver. Even if the porting needs to get done onto
> Windows and OSX we are still talking about getting a gigantic bunch of
> work for free.

What does it use for its audio backend?
This sounds crazy - but other than mplayer (only for ripping DVD
audio, which I probably could do with gstreamer if I was willing to
play with the pipes) I personally (note the personally) refuse to use
any multimedia app for playing that does not use a gstreamer backend.
OK, sox is another exception.

The reason is because I think in many ways, LotD (my passion) is too
fragmented - there's mplayer, xine, gstreamer, and apps that use their
own. I think gstreamer is technically the best, and if focus is put
there - we can get better apps.

slimserver is different, I don't expect them to use gstreamer because
perl bindings don't exist yet (and python bindings are still fairly
new), and slimserver is expected to run on a host of operating systems
- some of which either do not have gstreamer or have it but use a
different multimedia backend.

I guess what I'm saying - I would rather see an app like Rhythmbox and
AmoroK get that functionallity than see a new app - yet another
jukebox player ... if it uses gstreamer, then I'm all for it.

GStreamer is nice because you add a plugin (which can be closed, it's
libraries are lgpl) and lots of apps now have support for the new
codec - that's the way it should be. But I guess I'm going off topic a
wee bit.

-- 
http://mpeters.us/
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-28 Thread Pbox
The point I was going to make, excatly.
However there is one more thing to note. Linspire also releases their 
code under GPL. So it is a give and take.

Slimserver guys should take a note of the lsongs application.
http://mp3beamer.com/ss_lsongs-syncing.html
This would make a pretty nice itunes replacement, and could be easily 
bundled with slimserver. Even if the porting needs to get done onto 
Windows and OSX we are still talking about getting a gigantic bunch of 
work for free.

Something to chew on, I guess.
Peter
Marc Sherman wrote:
Michael Peters wrote:
GPL gives them the right to do what they are doing, so long as they
follow the rules.
Wether they contribute patches back or not is not necessary, any code
worth having will make its way back simply because they have to comply
with GPL themselves.
They aren't using a stolen project, GPL was written specifically to
allow software to be sold. For slim it sells hardware, for this group
that's primarily what it is doing as well.

This bears repeating.  Not only are they not stealing, they're not even 
being unethical.  By choosing to release software under the GPL, Slim 
Devices chose for this sort of thing to be allowed.  It's the nature of 
Free Software.  Free Software is _not_ about anyone's right to get 
software without paying for it -- it's about your rights to make 
software that you already have do what you need it to do, and your 
rights to redistribute those changes.

While they don't mention the GPL anywhere on their site, they are not 
required to, and I'm sure that the download does contain the required 
GPL notices, which inform any buyer of their rights to obtain and 
redistribute the source code.

- Marc
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-26 Thread Marc Sherman
Michael Peters wrote:
GPL gives them the right to do what they are doing, so long as they
follow the rules.
Wether they contribute patches back or not is not necessary, any code
worth having will make its way back simply because they have to comply
with GPL themselves.
They aren't using a stolen project, GPL was written specifically to
allow software to be sold. For slim it sells hardware, for this group
that's primarily what it is doing as well.
This bears repeating.  Not only are they not stealing, they're not even 
being unethical.  By choosing to release software under the GPL, Slim 
Devices chose for this sort of thing to be allowed.  It's the nature of 
Free Software.  Free Software is _not_ about anyone's right to get 
software without paying for it -- it's about your rights to make 
software that you already have do what you need it to do, and your 
rights to redistribute those changes.

While they don't mention the GPL anywhere on their site, they are not 
required to, and I'm sure that the download does contain the required 
GPL notices, which inform any buyer of their rights to obtain and 
redistribute the source code.

- Marc
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-25 Thread Michael Peters
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:21:21 -0800, Dave Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One more note: you'd think they would have included the SqueezeBox in
> the list of recommended players for feeding your stereo, but they left
> out both SqueezeBox and Roku. Hmm, think they don't want their customers
> reading about those products using SlimServer for free?

I think some people are reading too much into this.
This company is from the same CEO that started Lindows, which I did
not particularly like as a distro - but DID in fact give back to the
open source community, and continues to do so (they released a very
good WYSIWYG html editor, for example - that you can get the source to
without needing to buy their product)

GPL gives them the right to do what they are doing, so long as they
follow the rules.
Wether they contribute patches back or not is not necessary, any code
worth having will make its way back simply because they have to comply
with GPL themselves.

They aren't using a stolen project, GPL was written specifically to
allow software to be sold. For slim it sells hardware, for this group
that's primarily what it is doing as well.

Yes, it would be nice if they stated it was based on slimserver.
Maybe they don't because some of their changes break squeezebox
compatability? Maybe not, I don't know (I doubt it if the java thing
works)

But anyway - the software is licensed under GPL, so what they are
doing at least appears to be in spirit of GPL - and what I have seen
from the CEO - his products never interest me personally, but the
companies do give back to the community.

If it works with squeezebox, a free plug would be nice to the
developers of slimserver.
That is true, and hopefully that will come.

-- 
http://mpeters.us/
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


RE: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-25 Thread Dave Owen
Not to harp on the same old string, but I just posted this in the
MP3Beamer forum that the MP3Beamer site points to, which is hosted on
the Linspire site:

- - - - -

I currently own a copy of Linspire and have it running on a machine
successfully, so I have no desire to buy MP3Beamer's software package
(which comes with another copy of Linspire). I'd rather just get the
rest of the software.

I have looked at screenshots of the application in action, and read the
description of the software's capabilities (the back end, not the
syncing software) and it appears to be based on SlimServer, which is
freely available.

Is this accurate? Also, if so, does anyone know what enhancements (other
than syncing, branding and easy Linspire installation) have been made? 

- - - - -

Hopefully someone will provide a straight answer, and we'll all be
better informed. :)

(fwiw, I actually do have a copy of Linspire that I purchased running on
one of my machines -- and I would consider purchasing their software if
it came chock-full of useful enhancements. Here's hoping -- and hoping
that if it does, they'll roll it back to the main branch of SlimServer.)

Also worth noting: they display your email address in this forum, and
there's no way to turn it off! Really, really annoying. :(
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


RE: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-25 Thread Dave Owen
One more note: you'd think they would have included the SqueezeBox in
the list of recommended players for feeding your stereo, but they left
out both SqueezeBox and Roku. Hmm, think they don't want their customers
reading about those products using SlimServer for free?
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


RE: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-25 Thread Dave Owen
Incidentally, I just emailed the folks at LinuxDevices suggesting that
they would be doing their readers a service by noting that the MP3Beamer
software appears to be based on SlimServer, a GPLd project available for
free (after validating it with the MP3Tunes people, of course). :)
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-25 Thread Graham Scott
Michael Herger wrote:
...and have a look at the "Java interface". They did not even change the  
name on the screenshot...
http://www.mp3beamer.com/ss_java.html
wow! my original softsqueeze interface. I did a big comedy double-take 
when I clicked that link

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


RE: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-25 Thread Dave Owen
So, probably a few things to do here:

#1: someone should set up a web page (linked from SlimDevices.com, so it
hits the search engines quickly) that talks about this product by name
and how it is based on SlimServer, which is freely available. Hopefully
some of the consumers that are considering the software-only purchase
and do a bit of research will find the page and realize they might be
wasting money.

#2: someone should ask them if the source is included with purchase,
since "it's just a reskin of SlimServer anyway". Either they'll deny it,
acknowledge it, or ignore it -- but we need to know which before action
can be taken or judgement can be made.

I will say this: hopefully they'll use the resources to improve it, then
release the improvements back to the SlimServer project. After all,
that's what this whole GPL thing is all about. :)
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-25 Thread Michael Alletto
I didn't even notice the softsqueeze string in that screenshot
originally!  Geez, pretty crappy to do that without giving credit
where credit is due.


On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:40:41 +0100, Walter Wullschleger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... it definitively looks like slimserver. check this out
> http://www.mp3beamer.com/ss_mp3beamer.html and softsqueeze screenshot on
> their product page http://www.mp3beamer.com/ss_java.html
> 
> it seems that MP3Beamer is using slimserver as the core streaming
> server. Even port 9000 is used. I did not find any hint or link to
> slimserver and slimserver is not mentioned on their page. Is that allowed?
> 
> Walt
> 
> Michael Alletto wrote:
> 
> >http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4933903950.html
> >
> >Scroll down to the pictures of the web interface.  Does it look like
> >slimserver to anyone else?  And they are charging $70 for the software
> >only.  If they are really using slimserver but modified can they
> >really charge for it?
> >___
> >Discuss mailing list
> >Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
> >http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> ___
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
> http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
>
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-25 Thread Walter Wullschleger
... it definitively looks like slimserver. check this out 
http://www.mp3beamer.com/ss_mp3beamer.html and softsqueeze screenshot on 
their product page http://www.mp3beamer.com/ss_java.html

it seems that MP3Beamer is using slimserver as the core streaming 
server. Even port 9000 is used. I did not find any hint or link to 
slimserver and slimserver is not mentioned on their page. Is that allowed?

Walt
Michael Alletto wrote:
http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4933903950.html
Scroll down to the pictures of the web interface.  Does it look like
slimserver to anyone else?  And they are charging $70 for the software
only.  If they are really using slimserver but modified can they
really charge for it?
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
 

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-25 Thread momerath
I think if they are distributing the code outside their organization
(whether selling it or allowing download), they have to make their
source available upon request (by anyone).  Even if they only have to
make it available to customers, it must be supplied under the GPL,
which would allow those customers to pass it on.  So if they actually
made any useful modifications to slimserver, we can all benefit from
them regardless of whether we are customers.

> I think they only have available to make it available to those that
> they have distributed the product to (customers), but I'm not
> positive.
>
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-25 Thread Michael Peters
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:31:00 -0800, kdf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I dont think GPL really stops anyone from taking and selling.  It does, 
> however,
> require source be available for download on request.
> 

I think they only have available to make it available to those that
they have distributed the product to (customers), but I'm not
positive.

-- 
http://mpeters.us/
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-25 Thread kdf
Quoting Michael Herger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:19:28 -0600, Michael Alletto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4933903950.html
> >
> > Scroll down to the pictures of the web interface.  Does it look like
> > slimserver to anyone else?  And they are charging $70 for the software
> > only.  If they are really using slimserver but modified can they
> > really charge for it?
>
> ...and have a look at the "Java interface". They did not even change the
> name on the screenshot...
> http://www.mp3beamer.com/ss_java.html
>
I dont think GPL really stops anyone from taking and selling.  It does, however,
require source be available for download on request.

-kdf
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-25 Thread Michael Peters
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:19:28 -0600, Michael Alletto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4933903950.html
> 
> Scroll down to the pictures of the web interface.  Does it look like
> slimserver to anyone else?  And they are charging $70 for the software
> only.  If they are really using slimserver but modified can they
> really charge for it?

Yes - if they provide the source to their customers (which they do if
it is perl)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qi slimserver |grep "License"
Size: 21244838 License: GPL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ 

That means anyone can modify it (or not) and sell it - as long as they
comply with the GPL - which means they make the source available to
anyone they distribute it to.

-- 
http://mpeters.us/
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-25 Thread Michael Herger
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:19:28 -0600, Michael Alletto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
wrote:

http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4933903950.html
Scroll down to the pictures of the web interface.  Does it look like
slimserver to anyone else?  And they are charging $70 for the software
only.  If they are really using slimserver but modified can they
really charge for it?
...and have a look at the "Java interface". They did not even change the  
name on the screenshot...
http://www.mp3beamer.com/ss_java.html

--
Michael
---
Help translate SlimServer by using the
SlimString Translation Helper (http://www.herger.net/slim/)
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss