Re: [slim] Sreaming to Foobar

2007-05-24 Thread jimbres

My music server is a Linux box that feeds my SB3 on another floor, but
when I'm working, which requires Windows XP, I usually stream to foobar
or XMPlay rather than use SoftSqueeze. (My Windows machine has a much
better soundcard than the Linux box.)

XMPlay, Winamp  foobar all support global hotkeys, which let me
control the music even when the media software is buried under a
half-dozen other apps  another program has focus. SoftSqueeze only
supports the traditional Winamp keyboard shortcuts (C for pause, X for
play, etc),  those don't work unless SoftSqueeze has the focus.

If SoftSqueeze supported global hotkeys, I'd use it more often often.


-- 
jimbres

jimbres's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5122
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35369

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Sreaming to Foobar

2007-05-23 Thread Smiley Dan

I think it's reasonable whether the files are local or not. If you want
your slimserver to appear as an abstraction layer/appliance you play
music through you have to use it in some way. For instance, gathering
statistics, rating songs, integration with radio sources as a first
class concept and so on.

If you tie yourself to playing files you are coupling to an
implementation of music playback. It's generally better to abstract (in
my opinion).

This is one of my biggest frustrations with SlimServer. It doesn't make
it easy enough to do this. Stream.mp3 is primitive (only supports one
player for starters) and softsqueeze is really just a marketing tool
for the squeezebox, and so its UI is constrained to match it.


-- 
Smiley Dan

Smiley Dan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5456
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35369

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Sreaming to Foobar

2007-05-23 Thread bhaagensen

Smiley Dan;203970 Wrote: 
  If you want your slimserver to appear as an abstraction layer/appliance
 you play music through you have to use it in some way. 
 

Yes, but to me it seems obvious that it is indeed not the purpose of
the slimserver. It's by design tied to the squeezebox. I don't think
slimserver was ever ment as a general purpose music server, so it's
hard to complain about not being able to use it as one.  I such
products will appear in the future. What it seems to require is
standarized protocols for musicserver/musicclient communication. The
ones that comes to mind are avahi/upnp/bonjour, but these are partially
closed, and I'm not even sure they would be rich enough to do what
slimserver can. My guess is that in a few years this will become more
common.   

 
 If you tie yourself to playing files you are coupling to an
 implementation of music playback. It's generally better to abstract (in
 my opinion).
 
 This is one of my biggest frustrations with SlimServer. It doesn't make
 it easy enough to do this. Stream.mp3 is primitive (only supports one
 player for starters)
 

I have no problems streaming to several players at the same time using
stream.mp3. I think it's just being served over http, so it's possible
for the same reasons that make the forums viewable by more than one
person at the same time. And just out of curiosity. 

What is it that is so bad about softsqueeze ? If the requests are
reasonable, perhaps the developer will implement them?


-- 
bhaagensen

bhaagensen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7418
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35369

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Sreaming to Foobar

2007-05-22 Thread jonhanson

I think this is an eminently reasonable thing to want to do. My music
files are on a NAS box accessed via my router over wireless. Playing
the files directly can lead them frequently pausing or dropping out,
presumably since the underlying network file system wasn't designed to
handling streaming of media. My Squeezebox doesn't have this problem
since the SlimServer is designed for media streaming.

I too would like some sort of interface to the slimserver from within
foobar.

jon


-- 
jonhanson

jonhanson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7870
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35369

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Sreaming to Foobar

2007-05-22 Thread bhaagensen

luuk;202752 Wrote: 
  An alternative would be SoftSqueeze, but I why install something extra
 when I already have SlimServer to feed my SB2?
 

Arguably I don't think you actually need to install SoftSqueeze in
order to use it. It's kind of already installed when you install
slimserver. Just launch it, maybe as an applet, from the slimserver
interface. Then it's no more installed than any java applet you come
across on the web. So to me it seems Softsqueeze would be perfect for
you since you can control it from the slimserver interface which you
say you prefer.

On a more technical note I think that SoftSqueeze is preferable since
the stream.mp3 interface is very primitive in comparison. For instance
depending on how much cache foobar is using you would not get instant
track change since foobar would need to play the part of the current
track in it's cache. This could add up to several seconds, especially
with low bitrate files. This is all avoided due to the more complicated
slimprotocol used by softsqueeze. Moreover as it seems both you and
bjonhanson/b need to use serverside transcoding its a bit annoying
since with the stream.mp3 interface I think you need to set up
transcoding globally. I.e. either all your players play flac, or none
do. Softsqueeze gets assigned a virtual mac-address so you can do it
per player instead.

So, to me at least, softsqueeze is really the prefered thing to use
since it really is built as the glove to fit the hand of slimserver...


-- 
bhaagensen

bhaagensen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7418
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35369

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Sreaming to Foobar

2007-05-22 Thread Mark Lanctot

jonhanson;203880 Wrote: 
 I think this is an eminently reasonable thing to want to do. My music
 files are on a NAS box accessed via my router over wireless.

Ah yes, but this wouldn't quite be local playback now would it?

I was referring to playing files stored on the same PC running
SlimServer and running foobar.

Yours is a different situation.  Still, if you can't manage a FLAC's
worth of bandwidth across your WLAN, you have more pressing problems.


-- 
Mark Lanctot

'Sean Adams' Response-O-Matic checklist, patent pending!'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=200910postcount=2)

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35369

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Sreaming to Foobar

2007-05-18 Thread luuk

Mark I know what SoftSqueeze can do. It just seems a little silly to
have to resort to extra software when with the addition of a driver
SlimServer could be made to do the same thing.

Luuk


-- 
luuk

luuk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1287
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35369

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Sreaming to Foobar

2007-05-17 Thread Dave Dewey
Quoting luuk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

 
 Foobar is my preferred desktop player. Is it possible to link Slimserver
 with Foobar so that I can select the tracks to be played using
 SlimServer and have them play on the same computer using Foobar? NB.
 SlimServer is running on the same computer as Foobar (all the music is
 also on that machine).

Sure.  I don't know why you'd want to do this, but sure.

Open this url from within foobar:
http://localhost:9000/stream.mp3
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Sreaming to Foobar

2007-05-17 Thread Mark Lanctot

Point foobar to localhost:9000/stream.mp3.

But you won't have as much control over it as SoftSqueeze.  Also, why
not play the files directly in foobar?


-- 
Mark Lanctot

'Sean Adams' Response-O-Matic checklist, patent pending!'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=200910postcount=2)

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35369

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Sreaming to Foobar

2007-05-17 Thread luuk

Thanks. I tried your suggestion but with stream.mp3 it will only play
mp3 (all my files are flac and stream.flac doesn't work). Moroever,
even when I list more than one (MP3) song in SlimServer, I have to
reactivate Foobar after each song.

I do realise that what I am trying to do is a little silly, and I have
the strong sensation I am missing something. As far as I know though
SlimServer cannot send songs directly to the soundcard, can it?

Luuk


-- 
luuk

luuk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1287
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35369

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Sreaming to Foobar

2007-05-17 Thread Mark Lanctot

luuk;202747 Wrote: 
 Thanks. I tried your suggestion but with stream.mp3 it will only play
 mp3 (all my files are flac and stream.flac doesn't work). Moroever,
 even when I list more than one (MP3) song in SlimServer, I have to
 reactivate Foobar after each song.

You need to install LAME in a location SlimServer can see.  Go to
Player Settings - Audio - Bitrate Limiting.  You also need to enable
FLAC - MP3 in Server Settings - File Types.

 I do realise that what I am trying to do is a little silly, and I have
 the strong sensation I am missing something. As far as I know though
 SlimServer cannot send songs directly to the soundcard, can it?

Well, presumably foobar can access any file SlimServer can, and it can
output directly to your soundcard?  Not sure what advantage you're
gaining by using SlimServer here.


-- 
Mark Lanctot

'Sean Adams' Response-O-Matic checklist, patent pending!'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=200910postcount=2)

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35369

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Sreaming to Foobar

2007-05-17 Thread luuk

I have Lame but SlimServer doesn't acknowledge its presence. Does it
need to go anywhere special?

I would like to use SlimServer as my interface to my music. An
alternative would be SoftSqueeze, but I why install something extra
when I already have SlimServer to feed my SB2?

Luuk


-- 
luuk

luuk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1287
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35369

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Sreaming to Foobar

2007-05-17 Thread Mark Lanctot

luuk;202752 Wrote: 
 I have Lame but SlimServer doesn't acknowledge its presence. Does it
 need to go anywhere special?

I'm not sure - the SlimServer directory?

 I would like to use SlimServer as my interface to my music. An
 alternative would be SoftSqueeze, but I why install something extra
 when I already have SlimServer to feed my SB2?

SoftSqueeze doesn't require this sort of transcoding - it behaves like
your SB2 and even looks like it.  You get visualizations and you can
fully control SlimServer through it - start, stop, search, FF/REW of
native formats, etc.  Plus you can run it right from SlimServer - just
click Help - SoftSqueeze.

But again, you can do all this from within foobar.


-- 
Mark Lanctot

'Sean Adams' Response-O-Matic checklist, patent pending!'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=200910postcount=2)

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35369

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss