Re: Calc needs another review
Michele Petrovsky wrote: Folks, I've finished my proofreading of the Getting Started guide (version 4.1, copyright 2022). The project is so well done that I have little to suggest in the way of improving it. But I did find three contexts in which it might be tweaked a little. 1. A glossary, especially of terms (e.g., from pages 11 and 12, odbc; jdbc, GNU, kernel, and glibc; page 114: regular expression; page 158: Bezler curves; page 185: database normalization) with which a lot of people might be unfamiliar, would make *Getting Started* even more useful. 1. Greater consistency in the presentation of internal links (for instance, some Figures being shown in the text *before**,* rather than after, the link to them – such as, on page 273, the reference to Figure 244, which occurs *after* the Figure itself) would improve workability. 1. Some more “colloquial” wording might also serve to make less skilled users more comfortable. For instance, on page 94, what's shown as “provides the oportunity” might be better expressed simply as “allows you to”. I've got lots more individual items, but those are the basic contexts. Tell me how you'd like to proceed. And thanks again for the opportunity … Michele; Thank you for all your good work on your review of the Getting Started Guide Is this Glossary intended to be included as part of the Back Matter of the full book, or as Francis addressed below in his reply as a stand-alone document that could be inclusive of the complete set of User Guides. How we proceed in the long run depends on a number of factors. For the Glossary it depends on its ultimate use. If it is meant as a stand-alone document for one guide or as an integrated part of the book it would be handled one way, if as a stand-alone document for the entire set of guides it would be another way entirely. I will start a [Discuss] thread so that all the members can give their opinions on the best way to do it. For the consistency of Figure placement I agree with Francis that it would be best addressed in the Calc Guide as the placement has to be addressed in the chapter documents. The full book is simply the chapter docs merged into one doc along with any Front Matter and/or Back Matter if it is required. For the more colloquial wording, that can start to be addressed as I work through the Writer Guide, and followed up in the rest of the guides as they are started. If you could write up your suggestions and post them here all of the team members can have access to them. Regards Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Calc needs another review
Hello Francis, I will comment on your suggestion in-line F Campos Costero wrote: Hi Michele, I think a standalone glossary could be very useful. There is a lot of jargon and it would not be practical to give an adequate explanation of terms within the flow of the text.I also suspect that there would be a lot of overlap in the terms among the various guides, making a standalone glossary more practical. Although a stand-alone Glossary would be an excellent addition, remember we also publish the individual chapters. It may be helpful to have a glossary specific to each chapter. What do you think? You make a good point about the location of figures. I'm inclined to make those changes in the next guide to get a major revision, which would be the Calc Guide. I think Keith is about ready to publish the Writer Guide. Actually I am not ready to publish it, With all the time spent on getting to Getting started book right, as well as things in my personal life, I am behind on reviewing the chapters. Chapter one is ready, but in Chpater 2 I found a number of corrections that need to be made. I will be starting Chapter 3 today and spending most of my time the next few weeks reviewing the rest of the chapters. You are right about some passages being less friendly than they could be. All of the guides suffer from uneven tone. There have been many authors and I think some spoke English as a second language.It's probably not practical, or even desirable, to completely even out the style, but introducing a bias towards less formal writing is a good idea. I wholeheartedly agree with the above. Some of it could also be from repeated us of the same phrasing or word. This is more a style issue and would need to be addressed on an individual basis. Some of these style issues may be a result of my own bias, for which I apologize profusely. What would you think of working with me to complete the revision of the Calc guide? The version in the Git repository has been substantially revised from the version on the web page but it could use improvements like the ones you suggest. In relatively little time we could have something to replace the very old version on the web page. I think that would bring the biggest improvement to the published documentation for the least effort on our part. We could then come back to implement your specific suggestions for the Getting Started guide having acquired some experience on the Calc guide. I think this would a good idea as well. It would give Michele an opportunity to get familiar with GitHub and be able to more interactively rather than having to wait wait until a guide or it's chapters are published to he mwiki. Regards Keith Thanks for all your effort so far. If you would rather concentrate on the glossary exclusively or work on any other aspect of the documentation, just say so! Regards, Francis On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 12:34 PM Michele Petrovsky < petrovskymich...@gmail.com> wrote: Folks, I've finished my proofreading of the Getting Started guide (version 4.1, copyright 2022). The project is so well done that I have little to suggest in the way of improving it. But I did find three contexts in which it might be tweaked a little. 1. A glossary, especially of terms (e.g., from pages 11 and 12, odbc; jdbc, GNU, kernel, and glibc; page 114: regular expression; page 158: Bezler curves; page 185: database normalization) with which a lot of people might be unfamiliar, would make *Getting Started* even more useful. 1. Greater consistency in the presentation of internal links (for instance, some Figures being shown in the text *before**,* rather than after, the link to them – such as, on page 273, the reference to Figure 244, which occurs *after* the Figure itself) would improve workability. 1. Some more “colloquial” wording might also serve to make less skilled users more comfortable. For instance, on page 94, what's shown as “provides the oportunity” might be better expressed simply as “allows you to”. I've got lots more individual items, but those are the basic contexts. Tell me how you'd like to proceed. And thanks again for the opportunity … On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 12:57 AM F Campos Costero wrote: On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 8:40 AM Keith N. McKenna < keith.mcke...@comcast.net wrote: F Campos Costero wrote: On the Calc Guide, I will first accept or reject all of the changes currently shown and push those versions back to the repository. Judging from the first chapter, all of my and Dick's changes have not yet been accepted. I hope I will have time after that to do a full review of each document. Let me know if that plan isn't good. Regards, Francis That sounds good Francis. Thanks for moving this along. Keith On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:08 AM Keith N. McKenna < keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: F Campos Costero wrote: I'll take a look at the Calc changes. Francis Tha
Re: Calc needs another review
I'm thinking that, for the time being at least, concentrating on a glossary would be best. I have one that I put together (several years ago) for my students. It doesn't include all the words and phrases that jumped out during proofreading, and some of those it does include may be moot or redundant. But I think the structure could serve well. I tested it earlier today, and everything works. The only thing would be, of course, that the links from glossary page to individual word, would have to be redone. Let me know what you think / how you'd like to proceed. On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 7:23 PM F Campos Costero wrote: > Hi Michele, > I think a standalone glossary could be very useful. There is a lot of > jargon and it would not be practical to give an adequate explanation of > terms within the flow of the text.I also suspect that there would be a lot > of overlap in the terms among the various guides, making a standalone > glossary more practical. > > You make a good point about the location of figures. I'm inclined to make > those changes in the next guide to get a major revision, which would be the > Calc Guide. I think Keith is about ready to publish the Writer Guide. > > You are right about some passages being less friendly than they could be. > All of the guides suffer from uneven tone. There have been many authors and > I think some spoke English as a second language.It's probably not > practical, or even desirable, to completely even out the style, but > introducing a bias towards less formal writing is a good idea. > > What would you think of working with me to complete the revision of the > Calc guide? The version in the Git repository has been substantially > revised from the version on the web page but it could use improvements like > the ones you suggest. In relatively little time we could have something to > replace the very old version on the web page. I think that would bring the > biggest improvement to the published documentation for the least effort on > our part. We could then come back to implement your specific suggestions > for the Getting Started guide having acquired some experience on the Calc > guide. > > Thanks for all your effort so far. If you would rather concentrate on the > glossary exclusively or work on any other aspect of the documentation, just > say so! > > > Regards, > Francis > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 12:34 PM Michele Petrovsky < > petrovskymich...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Folks, I've finished my proofreading of the Getting Started guide > (version > > 4.1, copyright 2022). > > > > The project is so well done that I have little to suggest in the way of > > improving it. But I did find three contexts in which it might be tweaked > a > > little. > > > >1. > > > >A glossary, especially of terms (e.g., from pages 11 and 12, odbc; > jdbc, > >GNU, kernel, and glibc; page 114: regular expression; page 158: Bezler > >curves; page 185: database normalization) with which a lot of people > > might > >be unfamiliar, would make *Getting Started* even more useful. > > > > > >1. > > > >Greater consistency in the presentation of internal links (for > instance, > >some Figures being shown in the text *before**,* rather than after, > the > >link to them – such as, on page 273, the reference to Figure 244, > which > >occurs *after* the Figure itself) would improve workability. > > > > > >1. > > > >Some more “colloquial” wording might also serve to make less skilled > >users more comfortable. For instance, on page 94, what's shown as > > “provides > >the oportunity” might be better expressed simply as “allows you to”. > > > > I've got lots more individual items, but those are the basic contexts. > Tell > > me how you'd like to proceed. > > > > And thanks again for the opportunity … > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 12:57 AM F Campos Costero > > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 8:40 AM Keith N. McKenna < > > keith.mcke...@comcast.net > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > F Campos Costero wrote: > > > > > On the Calc Guide, I will first accept or reject all of the changes > > > > > currently shown and push those versions back to the repository. > > Judging > > > > > from the first chapter, all of my and Dick's changes have not yet > > been > > > > > accepted. I hope I will have time after that to do a full review of > > > each > > > > > document. Let me know if that plan isn't good. > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Francis > > > > > > > > > That sounds good Francis. Thanks for moving this along. > > > > > > > > Keith > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:08 AM Keith N. McKenna < > > > > keith.mcke...@comcast.net> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> F Campos Costero wrote: > > > > >>> I'll take a look at the Calc changes. > > > > >>> Francis > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks Francis. I will finish with the Getting started changes > from > > > > >> Czeslaw morning, and will get back to the Writer Guide this > > a
Re: Calc needs another review
Hi Michele, I think a standalone glossary could be very useful. There is a lot of jargon and it would not be practical to give an adequate explanation of terms within the flow of the text.I also suspect that there would be a lot of overlap in the terms among the various guides, making a standalone glossary more practical. You make a good point about the location of figures. I'm inclined to make those changes in the next guide to get a major revision, which would be the Calc Guide. I think Keith is about ready to publish the Writer Guide. You are right about some passages being less friendly than they could be. All of the guides suffer from uneven tone. There have been many authors and I think some spoke English as a second language.It's probably not practical, or even desirable, to completely even out the style, but introducing a bias towards less formal writing is a good idea. What would you think of working with me to complete the revision of the Calc guide? The version in the Git repository has been substantially revised from the version on the web page but it could use improvements like the ones you suggest. In relatively little time we could have something to replace the very old version on the web page. I think that would bring the biggest improvement to the published documentation for the least effort on our part. We could then come back to implement your specific suggestions for the Getting Started guide having acquired some experience on the Calc guide. Thanks for all your effort so far. If you would rather concentrate on the glossary exclusively or work on any other aspect of the documentation, just say so! Regards, Francis On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 12:34 PM Michele Petrovsky < petrovskymich...@gmail.com> wrote: > Folks, I've finished my proofreading of the Getting Started guide (version > 4.1, copyright 2022). > > The project is so well done that I have little to suggest in the way of > improving it. But I did find three contexts in which it might be tweaked a > little. > >1. > >A glossary, especially of terms (e.g., from pages 11 and 12, odbc; jdbc, >GNU, kernel, and glibc; page 114: regular expression; page 158: Bezler >curves; page 185: database normalization) with which a lot of people > might >be unfamiliar, would make *Getting Started* even more useful. > > >1. > >Greater consistency in the presentation of internal links (for instance, >some Figures being shown in the text *before**,* rather than after, the >link to them – such as, on page 273, the reference to Figure 244, which >occurs *after* the Figure itself) would improve workability. > > >1. > >Some more “colloquial” wording might also serve to make less skilled >users more comfortable. For instance, on page 94, what's shown as > “provides >the oportunity” might be better expressed simply as “allows you to”. > > I've got lots more individual items, but those are the basic contexts. Tell > me how you'd like to proceed. > > And thanks again for the opportunity … > > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 12:57 AM F Campos Costero > wrote: > > > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 8:40 AM Keith N. McKenna < > keith.mcke...@comcast.net > > > > > wrote: > > > > > F Campos Costero wrote: > > > > On the Calc Guide, I will first accept or reject all of the changes > > > > currently shown and push those versions back to the repository. > Judging > > > > from the first chapter, all of my and Dick's changes have not yet > been > > > > accepted. I hope I will have time after that to do a full review of > > each > > > > document. Let me know if that plan isn't good. > > > > Regards, > > > > Francis > > > > > > > That sounds good Francis. Thanks for moving this along. > > > > > > Keith > > > > > > > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:08 AM Keith N. McKenna < > > > keith.mcke...@comcast.net> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> F Campos Costero wrote: > > > >>> I'll take a look at the Calc changes. > > > >>> Francis > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> Thanks Francis. I will finish with the Getting started changes from > > > >> Czeslaw morning, and will get back to the Writer Guide this > afternoon. > > > >> > > > >> Regards > > > >> Keith > > > >> > > > >>> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 1:07 PM Keith N. McKenna < > > > >> keith.mcke...@comcast.net> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > Digro has had changes for Calc waiting review for some time could > > > another member of the team start reviewing those so that Guide can > > > start > > > Moving along. > > > > > > I am still trying to catch up with with the Getting Started > changes > > > from > > > Czeslaw that Francis made and re publishing them, as well as > trying > > to > > > work on the Writer Guide. > > > > > > I have also been spending a lot of time taking my Girlfriend in > and > > > out > > > of the Veterans Administration Hospital in the Jamaica Plains > > section > > > of > > > Boston for medical issues. > > > > > > Tha
Re: Calc needs another review
Folks, I've finished my proofreading of the Getting Started guide (version 4.1, copyright 2022). The project is so well done that I have little to suggest in the way of improving it. But I did find three contexts in which it might be tweaked a little. 1. A glossary, especially of terms (e.g., from pages 11 and 12, odbc; jdbc, GNU, kernel, and glibc; page 114: regular expression; page 158: Bezler curves; page 185: database normalization) with which a lot of people might be unfamiliar, would make *Getting Started* even more useful. 1. Greater consistency in the presentation of internal links (for instance, some Figures being shown in the text *before**,* rather than after, the link to them – such as, on page 273, the reference to Figure 244, which occurs *after* the Figure itself) would improve workability. 1. Some more “colloquial” wording might also serve to make less skilled users more comfortable. For instance, on page 94, what's shown as “provides the oportunity” might be better expressed simply as “allows you to”. I've got lots more individual items, but those are the basic contexts. Tell me how you'd like to proceed. And thanks again for the opportunity … On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 12:57 AM F Campos Costero wrote: > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 8:40 AM Keith N. McKenna > > wrote: > > > F Campos Costero wrote: > > > On the Calc Guide, I will first accept or reject all of the changes > > > currently shown and push those versions back to the repository. Judging > > > from the first chapter, all of my and Dick's changes have not yet been > > > accepted. I hope I will have time after that to do a full review of > each > > > document. Let me know if that plan isn't good. > > > Regards, > > > Francis > > > > > That sounds good Francis. Thanks for moving this along. > > > > Keith > > > > > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:08 AM Keith N. McKenna < > > keith.mcke...@comcast.net> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> F Campos Costero wrote: > > >>> I'll take a look at the Calc changes. > > >>> Francis > > >>> > > >> > > >> Thanks Francis. I will finish with the Getting started changes from > > >> Czeslaw morning, and will get back to the Writer Guide this afternoon. > > >> > > >> Regards > > >> Keith > > >> > > >>> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 1:07 PM Keith N. McKenna < > > >> keith.mcke...@comcast.net> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > Digro has had changes for Calc waiting review for some time could > > another member of the team start reviewing those so that Guide can > > start > > Moving along. > > > > I am still trying to catch up with with the Getting Started changes > > from > > Czeslaw that Francis made and re publishing them, as well as trying > to > > work on the Writer Guide. > > > > I have also been spending a lot of time taking my Girlfriend in and > > out > > of the Veterans Administration Hospital in the Jamaica Plains > section > > of > > Boston for medical issues. > > > > Thank you all in Advance > > Keith > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> - > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > > I just pushed new versions of all the Calc Guide chapters. I limited my > changes to formatting and fixing typos. Some sections would benefit from > broader revisions but I did not start that. Michele's input on that would > be very valuable. > I did not modify the front matter of any of the chapters and that will have > to be updated. I assume Keith has text that can be used for that with > minimal revisions. > > Regards, > Francis >
Re: Calc needs another review
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 8:40 AM Keith N. McKenna wrote: > F Campos Costero wrote: > > On the Calc Guide, I will first accept or reject all of the changes > > currently shown and push those versions back to the repository. Judging > > from the first chapter, all of my and Dick's changes have not yet been > > accepted. I hope I will have time after that to do a full review of each > > document. Let me know if that plan isn't good. > > Regards, > > Francis > > > That sounds good Francis. Thanks for moving this along. > > Keith > > > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:08 AM Keith N. McKenna < > keith.mcke...@comcast.net> > > wrote: > > > >> F Campos Costero wrote: > >>> I'll take a look at the Calc changes. > >>> Francis > >>> > >> > >> Thanks Francis. I will finish with the Getting started changes from > >> Czeslaw morning, and will get back to the Writer Guide this afternoon. > >> > >> Regards > >> Keith > >> > >>> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 1:07 PM Keith N. McKenna < > >> keith.mcke...@comcast.net> > >>> wrote: > >>> > Digro has had changes for Calc waiting review for some time could > another member of the team start reviewing those so that Guide can > start > Moving along. > > I am still trying to catch up with with the Getting Started changes > from > Czeslaw that Francis made and re publishing them, as well as trying to > work on the Writer Guide. > > I have also been spending a lot of time taking my Girlfriend in and > out > of the Veterans Administration Hospital in the Jamaica Plains section > of > Boston for medical issues. > > Thank you all in Advance > Keith > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > I just pushed new versions of all the Calc Guide chapters. I limited my changes to formatting and fixing typos. Some sections would benefit from broader revisions but I did not start that. Michele's input on that would be very valuable. I did not modify the front matter of any of the chapters and that will have to be updated. I assume Keith has text that can be used for that with minimal revisions. Regards, Francis
Re: Calc needs another review
F Campos Costero wrote: On the Calc Guide, I will first accept or reject all of the changes currently shown and push those versions back to the repository. Judging from the first chapter, all of my and Dick's changes have not yet been accepted. I hope I will have time after that to do a full review of each document. Let me know if that plan isn't good. Regards, Francis That sounds good Francis. Thanks for moving this along. Keith On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:08 AM Keith N. McKenna wrote: F Campos Costero wrote: I'll take a look at the Calc changes. Francis Thanks Francis. I will finish with the Getting started changes from Czeslaw morning, and will get back to the Writer Guide this afternoon. Regards Keith On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 1:07 PM Keith N. McKenna < keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: Digro has had changes for Calc waiting review for some time could another member of the team start reviewing those so that Guide can start Moving along. I am still trying to catch up with with the Getting Started changes from Czeslaw that Francis made and re publishing them, as well as trying to work on the Writer Guide. I have also been spending a lot of time taking my Girlfriend in and out of the Veterans Administration Hospital in the Jamaica Plains section of Boston for medical issues. Thank you all in Advance Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Calc needs another review
On the Calc Guide, I will first accept or reject all of the changes currently shown and push those versions back to the repository. Judging from the first chapter, all of my and Dick's changes have not yet been accepted. I hope I will have time after that to do a full review of each document. Let me know if that plan isn't good. Regards, Francis On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:08 AM Keith N. McKenna wrote: > F Campos Costero wrote: > > I'll take a look at the Calc changes. > > Francis > > > > Thanks Francis. I will finish with the Getting started changes from > Czeslaw morning, and will get back to the Writer Guide this afternoon. > > Regards > Keith > > > On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 1:07 PM Keith N. McKenna < > keith.mcke...@comcast.net> > > wrote: > > > >> Digro has had changes for Calc waiting review for some time could > >> another member of the team start reviewing those so that Guide can start > >> Moving along. > >> > >> I am still trying to catch up with with the Getting Started changes from > >> Czeslaw that Francis made and re publishing them, as well as trying to > >> work on the Writer Guide. > >> > >> I have also been spending a lot of time taking my Girlfriend in and out > >> of the Veterans Administration Hospital in the Jamaica Plains section of > >> Boston for medical issues. > >> > >> Thank you all in Advance > >> Keith > >> > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
Re: Calc needs another review
F Campos Costero wrote: I'll take a look at the Calc changes. Francis Thanks Francis. I will finish with the Getting started changes from Czeslaw morning, and will get back to the Writer Guide this afternoon. Regards Keith On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 1:07 PM Keith N. McKenna wrote: Digro has had changes for Calc waiting review for some time could another member of the team start reviewing those so that Guide can start Moving along. I am still trying to catch up with with the Getting Started changes from Czeslaw that Francis made and re publishing them, as well as trying to work on the Writer Guide. I have also been spending a lot of time taking my Girlfriend in and out of the Veterans Administration Hospital in the Jamaica Plains section of Boston for medical issues. Thank you all in Advance Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Calc needs another review
I'll take a look at the Calc changes. Francis On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 1:07 PM Keith N. McKenna wrote: > Digro has had changes for Calc waiting review for some time could > another member of the team start reviewing those so that Guide can start > Moving along. > > I am still trying to catch up with with the Getting Started changes from > Czeslaw that Francis made and re publishing them, as well as trying to > work on the Writer Guide. > > I have also been spending a lot of time taking my Girlfriend in and out > of the Veterans Administration Hospital in the Jamaica Plains section of > Boston for medical issues. > > Thank you all in Advance > Keith > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >