RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1
Hi Paul, > Thanks, Shawn, but when I go to that page, I don't > get an active content (or whatever) warning. Content on remote servers is usually blocked silently (no warning). If you DO NOT see green text in the first textbox then it was blocked. You'll need to download the script (linked from the bottom of the page) in order to test it locally for the security warning. Regards, Shawn K. Hall http://ReliableAnswers.com/ '// "I don't have a keyboard site on my computer. We have to download it." --Zachary Hall (my son), after being asked if he wanted me to hook up my MIDI keyboard to his computer --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ ___ To unsubscribe visit: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8601
RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1
Thanks, Shawn, but when I go to that page, I don't get an active content (or whatever) warning. -- Paul > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shawn K. Hall > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 8:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 > > Hi Paul, > > > ...I don't know any site that generate that warning, so I > > can't test it. Perhaps you could provide me with a link to > > such a site? > > The page here should work: > http://ReliableAnswers.com/x/dqsd/ggd-discover.asp > > I can almost guarantee it'll fail in your browser by default, just > under IE6's default security config. However, you can download the > script from the bottom and run it from your desktop, which does > essentially the same thing, but it does it in 'local' context - > under XP SP2 you should see it fail or prompt you depending on your > settings. > > Oh, and all the script does is create an XMLHttp object to download > a 'scrape' of Google in order to discover your Google Desktop key > (using RegEx). If you don't have a Google Desktop Key it does > nothing for you at all, but attempt to create that XMLHttp 'activex' > object, which is the security test you're after. > > Regards, > > Shawn K. Hall > http://ReliableAnswers.com/ > > '// > (c) Copywight Elmer Fudd. All wights wesewved. > > > > > --- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > ___ > To unsubscribe visit: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8601 > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004 > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004
RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1
Hi Paul, > ...I don't know any site that generate that warning, so I > can't test it. Perhaps you could provide me with a link to > such a site? The page here should work: http://ReliableAnswers.com/x/dqsd/ggd-discover.asp I can almost guarantee it'll fail in your browser by default, just under IE6's default security config. However, you can download the script from the bottom and run it from your desktop, which does essentially the same thing, but it does it in 'local' context - under XP SP2 you should see it fail or prompt you depending on your settings. Oh, and all the script does is create an XMLHttp object to download a 'scrape' of Google in order to discover your Google Desktop key (using RegEx). If you don't have a Google Desktop Key it does nothing for you at all, but attempt to create that XMLHttp 'activex' object, which is the security test you're after. Regards, Shawn K. Hall http://ReliableAnswers.com/ '// (c) Copywight Elmer Fudd. All wights wesewved. --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ ___ To unsubscribe visit: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8601
Re: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1
Paul wrote: I'm asking for evidence. For instance, you implied that after I approved dqsd, I'd still get the warning if a different webpage tried to run flagged content. Fine, but I don't know any site that generate that warning, so I can't test it. Perhaps you could provide me with a link to such a site? Try the racetv or comx searches. Or the help window. Monty --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ ___ To unsubscribe visit: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8601
RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1
I agree. Obviously something else going on. -- Paul From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Russel Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 8:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 Something else going on there, then. That’s the way it 3.1.8 behaves here, certainly. I admit, I have downloaded but not yet installed the 3.1.9 beta. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Sent: December 2, 2004 9:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 Thanks, Charlie. That would have been exactly what I wanted, except it didn’t work. First of all, as soon as I “approved” dqsd, I got an error about being unable to load the enhanced keyboard or something. It said that some combinations of hotkeys might not work. Then, when as you suggested, I entered just a question mark as the search, I got an IE Script Error message. -- Paul From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Russel Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 Actually, you can prove this to yourself. Click Allow Active Content to enable dqsd. Now, type ? into the search window, to bring up help – bingo, it prompts you, again. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Sent: December 2, 2004 3:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 Kim, by "refuse" I *do* mean the first thing you said, not the second--i.e., the security issue; not the annoyance. I *do* trust you, intentions-wise; but I'd feel more comfortable in the correctness department if you could site some authority or other evidence to support that by clicking "allow active content" I'm issuing page-specific, and not global, permission. -- Paul > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Gräsman > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 12:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 > > Hi Paul, > > FWIW, Allow Blocked Content is currently the safest way of making DQSD work. > It only allows the current executing page (as opposed to the application > running DQSD, or the system as a whole) to do whatever it tries to do, and > trust me, you can trust us. :) > > If, by "refuse", you mean that you can't bear the annoyance of have to > Allow, then I hear you. We're working on it! > > Kim > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul > > Sent: den 1 december 2004 22:50 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 > > > > Thanks for the info Brent. Since I absolutely refuse to > > "Allow Blocked Content," I guess I'll have to wait for 3.2 > > before I can escape from the Google Deskbar. > > > > -- > > Paul > > > > --- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > ___ > To unsubscribe visit: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8601 > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004 > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004 --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004 --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004
RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1
Something else going on there, then. That’s the way it 3.1.8 behaves here, certainly. I admit, I have downloaded but not yet installed the 3.1.9 beta. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Sent: December 2, 2004 9:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 Thanks, Charlie. That would have been exactly what I wanted, except it didn’t work. First of all, as soon as I “approved” dqsd, I got an error about being unable to load the enhanced keyboard or something. It said that some combinations of hotkeys might not work. Then, when as you suggested, I entered just a question mark as the search, I got an IE Script Error message. -- Paul From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Russel Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 Actually, you can prove this to yourself. Click Allow Active Content to enable dqsd. Now, type ? into the search window, to bring up help – bingo, it prompts you, again. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Sent: December 2, 2004 3:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 Kim, by "refuse" I *do* mean the first thing you said, not the second--i.e., the security issue; not the annoyance. I *do* trust you, intentions-wise; but I'd feel more comfortable in the correctness department if you could site some authority or other evidence to support that by clicking "allow active content" I'm issuing page-specific, and not global, permission. -- Paul > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Gräsman > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 12:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 > > Hi Paul, > > FWIW, Allow Blocked Content is currently the safest way of making DQSD work. > It only allows the current executing page (as opposed to the application > running DQSD, or the system as a whole) to do whatever it tries to do, and > trust me, you can trust us. :) > > If, by "refuse", you mean that you can't bear the annoyance of have to > Allow, then I hear you. We're working on it! > > Kim > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul > > Sent: den 1 december 2004 22:50 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 > > > > Thanks for the info Brent. Since I absolutely refuse to > > "Allow Blocked Content," I guess I'll have to wait for 3.2 > > before I can escape from the Google Deskbar. > > > > -- > > Paul > > > > --- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > ___ > To unsubscribe visit: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8601 > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004 > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004 --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004
RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1
Thanks, Charlie. That would have been exactly what I wanted, except it didn’t work. First of all, as soon as I “approved” dqsd, I got an error about being unable to load the enhanced keyboard or something. It said that some combinations of hotkeys might not work. Then, when as you suggested, I entered just a question mark as the search, I got an IE Script Error message. -- Paul From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Russel Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 Actually, you can prove this to yourself. Click Allow Active Content to enable dqsd. Now, type ? into the search window, to bring up help – bingo, it prompts you, again. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Sent: December 2, 2004 3:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 Kim, by "refuse" I *do* mean the first thing you said, not the second--i.e., the security issue; not the annoyance. I *do* trust you, intentions-wise; but I'd feel more comfortable in the correctness department if you could site some authority or other evidence to support that by clicking "allow active content" I'm issuing page-specific, and not global, permission. -- Paul > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Gräsman > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 12:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 > > Hi Paul, > > FWIW, Allow Blocked Content is currently the safest way of making DQSD work. > It only allows the current executing page (as opposed to the application > running DQSD, or the system as a whole) to do whatever it tries to do, and > trust me, you can trust us. :) > > If, by "refuse", you mean that you can't bear the annoyance of have to > Allow, then I hear you. We're working on it! > > Kim > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul > > Sent: den 1 december 2004 22:50 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 > > > > Thanks for the info Brent. Since I absolutely refuse to > > "Allow Blocked Content," I guess I'll have to wait for 3.2 > > before I can escape from the Google Deskbar. > > > > -- > > Paul > > > > --- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > ___ > To unsubscribe visit: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8601 > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004 > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004 --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004
RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1
Thanks, Monty. I understand the point. You're basically reiterating exactly what Ken said. I'm not asking for elaboration, though. I'm asking for evidence. For instance, you implied that after I approved dqsd, I'd still get the warning if a different webpage tried to run flagged content. Fine, but I don't know any site that generate that warning, so I can't test it. Perhaps you could provide me with a link to such a site? Again, it's not that I don't trust y'all; I just like to prove things to myself. Please don't take offense. TIA, -- Paul > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Monty Scroggins > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 2:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 > > > Paul it is blocking activeX content on the page being executed. Its a > *webpage*. Clicking "allow activeX content" allows it for *that* webpage. > When another webpage is initiated (like racetv for example) you will get > another warning bar. > > Monty > > > I *do* trust you, intentions-wise; but I'd feel more comfortable in the > > correctness > > department if you could site some authority or other evidence to support > > that by > > clicking "allow active content" I'm issuing page-specific, and not global, > > permission. > > > > -- > > Paul > > > > --- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > ___ > To unsubscribe visit: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8601 > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004 > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004
RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1
Hi Mitchell, > What I meant to say is on a VERTICAL TASK BAR 319 > only gives me the calendar when I right click. What is the 'calStart' variable set to in localprefs.js? /* Calendar start method. * 0 = right click * 1 = double click * default is 0 */ calStart=0; Regards, Shawn K. Hall http://ReliableAnswers.com/ '// The trouble with life is the lack of cool background music. --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ ___ To unsubscribe visit: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8601
[DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1
What I meant to say is on a VERTICAL TASK BAR 319 only gives me the calendar when I right click. --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ ___ To unsubscribe visit: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8601
[DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1
I installed the new 319 beta and I only get the calendar when I right click in the search box. --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ ___ To unsubscribe visit: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8601
RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1
Actually, you can prove this to yourself. Click Allow Active Content to enable dqsd. Now, type ? into the search window, to bring up help – bingo, it prompts you, again. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Sent: December 2, 2004 3:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 Kim, by "refuse" I *do* mean the first thing you said, not the second--i.e., the security issue; not the annoyance. I *do* trust you, intentions-wise; but I'd feel more comfortable in the correctness department if you could site some authority or other evidence to support that by clicking "allow active content" I'm issuing page-specific, and not global, permission. -- Paul > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Gräsman > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 12:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 > > Hi Paul, > > FWIW, Allow Blocked Content is currently the safest way of making DQSD work. > It only allows the current executing page (as opposed to the application > running DQSD, or the system as a whole) to do whatever it tries to do, and > trust me, you can trust us. :) > > If, by "refuse", you mean that you can't bear the annoyance of have to > Allow, then I hear you. We're working on it! > > Kim > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul > > Sent: den 1 december 2004 22:50 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 > > > > Thanks for the info Brent. Since I absolutely refuse to > > "Allow Blocked Content," I guess I'll have to wait for 3.2 > > before I can escape from the Google Deskbar. > > > > -- > > Paul > > > > --- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > ___ > To unsubscribe visit: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8601 > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004 > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004
RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1
Paul it is blocking activeX content on the page being executed. Its a *webpage*. Clicking "allow activeX content" allows it for *that* webpage. When another webpage is initiated (like racetv for example) you will get another warning bar. Monty > I *do* trust you, intentions-wise; but I'd feel more comfortable in the > correctness > department if you could site some authority or other evidence to support > that by > clicking "allow active content" I'm issuing page-specific, and not global, > permission. > > -- > Paul --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ ___ To unsubscribe visit: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8601
RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1
Kim, by "refuse" I *do* mean the first thing you said, not the second--i.e., the security issue; not the annoyance. I *do* trust you, intentions-wise; but I'd feel more comfortable in the correctness department if you could site some authority or other evidence to support that by clicking "allow active content" I'm issuing page-specific, and not global, permission. -- Paul > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Gräsman > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 12:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 > > Hi Paul, > > FWIW, Allow Blocked Content is currently the safest way of making DQSD work. > It only allows the current executing page (as opposed to the application > running DQSD, or the system as a whole) to do whatever it tries to do, and > trust me, you can trust us. :) > > If, by "refuse", you mean that you can't bear the annoyance of have to > Allow, then I hear you. We're working on it! > > Kim > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul > > Sent: den 1 december 2004 22:50 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 > > > > Thanks for the info Brent. Since I absolutely refuse to > > "Allow Blocked Content," I guess I'll have to wait for 3.2 > > before I can escape from the Google Deskbar. > > > > -- > > Paul > > > > --- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > ___ > To unsubscribe visit: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id01 > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004 > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.804 / Virus Database: 546 - Release Date: 11/30/2004
RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1
Hi Paul, FWIW, Allow Blocked Content is currently the safest way of making DQSD work. It only allows the current executing page (as opposed to the application running DQSD, or the system as a whole) to do whatever it tries to do, and trust me, you can trust us. :) If, by "refuse", you mean that you can't bear the annoyance of have to Allow, then I hear you. We're working on it! Kim > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul > Sent: den 1 december 2004 22:50 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] DQSD 3.1.9 BETA-1 > > Thanks for the info Brent. Since I absolutely refuse to > "Allow Blocked Content," I guess I'll have to wait for 3.2 > before I can escape from the Google Deskbar. > > -- > Paul --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ ___ To unsubscribe visit: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-users [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8601
