Re: [Drakelist] Drakelist Digest, Vol 35, Issue 15

2011-05-14 Thread Jim Bo

Drakers,

I too have the same problem and was 
going to do what Garey suggests,
but had other "stuff" pop up (weddings, 
health, family, and PSK-31 bug bite),

so have not tried anything yet.

Waiting with baited breath to what Joe 
finds. I made my own cables and thery 
are the same
total capacitance spec'ed by Drake 
(shorter) using the pF/foot data.


Thanks Joe and others.

Jim




Joe Loverti wrote:
When I tune up using the T-4XB PTO 
on 40 meters, I'm getting about 60
watts maximum. When I tune up using 
the R-4A PTO the power output is
95+ watts maximum. There's also 
about a 10 db difference in receive
between the two units, the R-4A 
being the stronger receive of the
two. I am using original Drake 
interconnect cables between the two
units. I'd expect some difference 
between them, but this seems

excessive. Any thoughts?

WW8X
Joe





--

Message: 6
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 00:01:56 -0400
From: Joe Loverti 
To: drakelist@zerobeat.net
Subject: [Drakelist] Power output 
difference between T-4XB and R-4A

PTO's
Message-ID: 

Content-Type: text/plain; 
charset="iso-8859-1"


Curt,
Thanks for the answer. I'm using the 
cable with metal tag for the 
injection.
I haven't tried tuning up the T-4XB 
without it plugged in -- I'll give it 
a
try an see what gives. If there's no 
difference, that would eliminate the

cable as the problem.

WW8X
Joe



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] T-4XC Output Varies

2011-03-31 Thread Jim Bo

I had the same issue with mine.

Pout would start at 140 watts at initial 
key down, and drift down to 90 watts.


Rebuilt the AC-4 as the plate caps were 
"leaking" (could only see "leak" after 
removing tall "lytics").


Did my own rebuild with  two 270 uf, 450 
volt caps that I had laying around.


Pout is now constant.  BTW, the rebuild 
also fixed a sidetone issue.


Look at B+ on AC-4 and see if it drifts 
down when you key, or just rebuild the 
psu for peace of mind.


Jim 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Drakelist Digest, Vol 33, Issue 51

2011-03-29 Thread Jim Bo

Terry,

Excellent point.  Use every precaution 
when soldering, unsoldering and 
grinding.


Thanks

Jim
WA9ZBV




Jim and the group:

I'm the someone.. I'm also a guitar 
builder, and want to mention
something about dust.  I'm was as 
guilty as anyone about grinding stuff 
w/o
even a paper mask until someone I knew 
was grinding abalone shell for a
guitar inlay and almost had to have a 
lung transplant.  They only did it
once, too.  Some dust is terribly 
dangerous - I don't know how solder 
fits
in there, but it wouldn't hurt to use, 
at least, a paper mask.  After
hearing about this guy, I now use a 
respirator for most anything that 
floats
in the air.  Go ahead and put me in 
the fanatic category, but I couldn't 
let

this go by without a small caution.

73
Terry K7WLD
Wenatchee, WA

-Original Message-
From: drakelist-boun...@zerobeat.net 
[mailto:drakelist-boun...@zerobeat.net]

On Behalf Of Jim Bo
Sent: Monday, 28 March, 2011 16:20
To: drakelist@zerobeat.net
Subject: [Drakelist] Unsoldering Caps

You can fight the solder with heat OR
take the easy way and grind the solder
joint with a Dremmel and cut off disk 
or

a diamond tipped grinding bit that
Dremmel also supplies.  I know Iknow,
some one will bring up dust and the
Mayan Calendar and possible
meteor...never really an issue
AND the old cap pulls out with the
gentlest of pulls AND there is no old
solder, so the new one fits in easily
AND you have a clean piece of metal to
solder the new one.  Or, you can risk
melting wiresI have 
replaced

caps in 4 rigs and one was with the
soldering iron, solder suckers, solder
wick, wire cutters and the other three
were with the Dremmel.  BTW, no melted
wires with any of the 4 rigs.

Jim

WA9ZBV




___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Unsoldering Caps

2011-03-28 Thread Jim Bo
You can fight the solder with heat OR 
take the easy way and grind the solder 
joint with a Dremmel and cut off disk or 
a diamond tipped grinding bit that 
Dremmel also supplies.  I know Iknow, 
some one will bring up dust and the 
Mayan Calendar and possible 
meteor...never really an issue 
AND the old cap pulls out with the 
gentlest of pulls AND there is no old 
solder, so the new one fits in easily 
AND you have a clean piece of metal to 
solder the new one.  Or, you can risk 
melting wiresI have replaced 
caps in 4 rigs and one was with the 
soldering iron, solder suckers, solder 
wick, wire cutters and the other three 
were with the Dremmel.  BTW, no melted 
wires with any of the 4 rigs.


Jim

WA9ZBV 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Electrolytic Removal

2011-03-28 Thread Jim Bo
Dremmel tool wiht small cut off "blade" or Dremmel diamond tip "bit" with a 
small drill.


Jim
WA9zbv___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Recommended Microphone for T-4XC??

2011-03-11 Thread Jim Bo
Anyone interested in selling recommended Microphone??

Thanks

Jim___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] T-4XC on 160 Meters

2011-03-11 Thread Jim Bo
When tuning the T-4XC on 160 meters, into a dummy load, the load control is at 
"zero" or maximum capacitance.

I clearly do not get a peak in output power when changing the load control, the 
Pout continue to increase until I hit zero on the dial (max. cap).
The plate control clearly has a peak at "3 on the dial".

Comments??

Thanks

Jim___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] T-4XC Plate Current

2011-03-11 Thread Jim Bo

Is it normal for the T-4XC plate current to read 120 mA when:

1.  in CW mode
2.  Xmitter is keyed using mic line (no mic element connected, just foot 
switch).

I have adjusted the bias per the manual at the mark on the meter.

If not normal, any ideas as to what the issue may be?

Thanks

Jim___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Drake2-NT with Heathkit HG-10B won't work on 15 Meters

2011-03-06 Thread Jim Bo
No output on 15 Meters with HG-10B VFO.  All other bands work OK and I get 
output except for 15 Meters.

I have done the modification where RFC1 of V1A is changed from 350 uH to 1 mH.

2-NT with HG-10B works on 80, 40, 20 and 10 Meters, won't work on 15 meters.

2-NT works on all bands when I use crystals that I have.

Per Drake manual, 2-NT requires 12 Vrms on 15M, the HG-10B specs 5 Vrms output. 
 

The change in RFC1 to 1 mH was supposed to increase the output of the HG-10B 
per a "hints and kinks" in an old QST back in the 70's.

Thoughts and comments please?

Thanks

Jim___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] T-4XC Output Power Varies...................

2011-03-01 Thread Jim Bo

Garey,

Thanks for the response.

I am using Belden RG-59U for the 
injection cable.  Spec is 16.3 pf/foot 
and I have one foot length, so the 
capacitance of the cable is less than 
what Drake "specifies".


I do not have the Carrier Osc cable 
connected between the rigs as I 
understand that is for SSB only and dows 
not play a role in CW, but will try 
connecting with a 1 foot piece of Belden 
RG-59U (again will result in less 
capacitance than what Drake "spec'ed").


I am not sure what you mean by  ""a 
touch-up of the RF TUNE and GAIN 
controls as well as the

PRESELECTOR control in the receiver"".


I re-peaked both preselectors on the 
rcvr and xmitter and still have a big 
difference between"xmtr" and "separate" 
switch positions.  Am I correct in 
saying the source of the drive for the 
final amplifier is same for the "xmtr" 
and "separate" position of the 
transceive switch??


Big difference between 19 watts and 100 
watts.


Also, what causes the need to advance 
the gain control so far for CW, or 
should I even worry about that?  Is 
there an adjustment for that?  I do not 
see anything in the manual that says to 
"adjust this".


Tnx

Jim




Message: 5
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 10:30:42 -0500
From: Garey Barrell 


To: drakelist@zerobeat.net
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] T-4XC Output 
Power Varies...
Message-ID: 
<4d6d1122.4020...@mindspring.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; 
charset=windows-1252; format=flowed


Jim -

It is normal for there to be a 'small' 
difference between power output
and receiver sensitivity in the 
various TRANSCEIVE switch positions.


First, the INJ cable MUST be a low 
capacitance coax or mic cable.  Cable
impedance, loss, shielding, etc. are 
NOT important, only the

'capacitance per foot'.

The original cables were all 38" long, 
tip to tip.


Original Drake INJ and CAR OSC Cables 
= 19 pF/ft = .160" o.d. (foam poly)


RG-62 = 93R = 13.5 pF/ft = 0.240" o.d.
RG-59 = 75R = 14.8 pF/ft = 0.242" o.d.
RG-6 = 75R = 16.2 pF/ft = 0.270" o.d.
RG-174= 50R = 30.8 pF/ft = 0.110" o.d.
Mic Cable (Belden 8410) = Hi-Z = 33 
pf/ft = 0.160" o.d. (foam poly)
Mic Cable (Belden 8421) = Hi-Z = 16 
pf/ft = 0.180" o.d. (foam poly)
R/S Audio Patch Cable = 28 pF/ft = 
0.165" o.d. (poly)


The best choice is the Belden 8421 
Audio cable from their "Brilliance"
line.  It looks just like the other 
cables, and is very flexible.  The
RG-62 is OK, but it is 50% larger and 
far less flexible.  RG-62 is also
prone to shorting if bent over too 
small a radius, and is susceptible to
heat damage when soldering connectors. 
The best "feature" of RG-62 is
that it is often FREE, since there 
have been many miles of it pulled out
of old computer networks.  Belden 8421 
has been available by the foot
from someone on the list in the recent 
past.


The CAR OSC cable in the C-Line should 
be the same cable, although it

isn't quite as critical.

The proper cables will minimize the 
difference, however it may still
require a touch-up of the RF TUNE and 
GAIN controls as well as the
PRESELECTOR control in the receiver. 
Especially in CW, the GAIN control
must be advanced further.  The ALC 
masks this in TUNE, but the GAIN
control is more critical in CW.  It 
also helps to do the PreMixer
alignment steps with the two cabled 
together using the correct cables.


It does sound like your GAIN control 
is on the low side.  Typically, on
40M in TUNE, you should get full 
output (typically 130W, limited by 
ALC)
before 12 o'clock.  CW shouldn't 
require more than about 1 o'clock for
full output.  These are two different 
controls on the same shaft.  In
TUNE one section is an AF gain control 
adjusting the level of a 1 kHz
audio tone into the Balanced 
Modulator, similar to whistling into 
the
microphone.  In CW, the other section 
controls a DC current applied to
the diodes in the Balanced Modulator 
to un-balance it and allow the
Carrier Oscillator to come through to 
be amplified and mixed to generate

the CW signal.

73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 2-C/2-NT, 4-A, 4-B, C-Line
and TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs






___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] T-4XC Output Power Varies...................

2011-02-28 Thread Jim Bo
My T-4XC has different Pout depending on the position of the "transceive" 
switch and in the CW Mode.

With transceive swith set on "separate" 
Gain is at 2:30
Plate current is 300 ma
Pout is 100 watts

With transceive switch set on "rcvr"
Gain is at 2:30
Plate current is 320 ma
Pout is 117 watt

When transceive switch is on "xmtr"
Gain is at 2:30
Plate current is 140 ma
Pout is 19 watts

When transceive switch is on "xmtr"
Gain is at 5:00 (fully clockwise)
Palte current is 320 ma
Pout is 117 watts

What is pecular is that Pout when seperate compared to Pout when xmtr 
supposedly uses the same oscillator signal for drive.

I did not see anything in the manual that looks like there is an alignment step 
for this.

Comments?

Thanks

Jim___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Drake 2-NT and Heathkit HG-10B

2011-02-24 Thread Jim Bo

The 2-NT manual says it need 12 Volts RMS on 15 meters from a VFO to operate 
properly.

The manual also mentions that the Heathkit HG-10B is "suitable" as an external 
VFO.  The Heathkit manual says the output is 5v RMS open circuit.

My 2-NT has less than 1 watt output on 15M  and I beleive it is due to the 
"low" output of the Heathkit VFO (when using a 7.007 mHz xtal, it outputs full 
power).

Any comments or experience from the members??

Thanks

Jim___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Want to Buy Drake 2-C with acessories.....Please state condition and price....Thanks

2011-02-11 Thread Jim Bo
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] My Drake/Sherwood R-4C Rules my shack! (Don Jones)

2011-02-05 Thread Jim Bo
IMHO, the only thing that is better than 
what Don describes is
the R-4C as he describes BUT...use a 
Timewave 599ZX
with a pair of noise canceling earphones 
(the Bose are expensive, but

quite comfortable).
The Timewave has a superior audio amp 
and I set up the filter as a
bandpass with the low end at ~300 Hz and 
the high end at 1,500 Hz.
This helps with the low end "rumble" and 
the high end atmosphere noise
and makes the radio even more enjoyable. 
I rarely use the other features
of the DSP filter, but on occasion, the 
"Random" function does help.  Only
on few occasions do I use the CW 
function of the DSP.  It does help also,
but for the most part, the R-4C audio 
into the DSP filter is "clean".  I have
recently aligned my R-4C and used the 
headphone jack with out the
Timewave and again realized what a huge 
difference it makes.  The DSP filter is
not low cost, but I got it 10 years ago 
and it is still a viable solution.  I am 
sure
that there are lower cost filters out 
there, but can not attest to the audio 
amps on
them.  One of the cost drivers of the 
599ZX is the ability to go to 5 kHz
as the upper cut off frequency.  This 
compares to others that have a cut off 
at
3 kHz or so.  For amateur radio, the 3 
kHz is fine, but I also use the 599ZX 
with

my Drake R-8B for BCBDX and Beacons.

Jim
WA9ZBV
Orange, CA






--

Message: 5
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 08:51:43 -0800
From: "Don Jones" 
To: 
Subject: [Drakelist] My Drake/Sherwood 
R-4C Rules my shack!
Message-ID: 
<000c01cbc554$f890e040$e9b2a0c0$@net>
Content-Type: text/plain; 
charset="us-ascii"


Like some of you here, I have been 
working very hard to get into the log 
of
the DX-pedition to the South Orkney 
Islands. My favorite band/mode has
always been 40M CW. Last night I 
finally got my contact with them.
Considering I am only running 600W to 
a 20M double zepp from W. WA it has

been a bit of a chore.
My fully loaded "Sherwood R-4C smoked 
my Ten Tec OMNI 6+ (which has a full
load to TT filters and the INRAD CW 
roofing filter mod) last night. On the
Drake VP8ORK was only a 529 using GUF 
600Hz roofing filter and the DRAKE OEM
250Hz cw filter with no ringing 
filters or white noise. One the OMNI 
VI+
VP8ORK was only 229 due to the 
receiver white noise and the howling 
DSP
noise. It is absolutely amazing to 
hear the difference of the two 
receivers.
I do prefer the digital control that 
the "6" offers, but if you can't hear
'em you ain't going to work 'em. A 
trip down to Fry's electronics for a 
4PDT
12V relay, a 3 pos double pole rotary 
wafer switch, a bud box and 6 RCA jack
and 3 1/8" headphone jacks is on the 
agenda next so I have TR switching for
the R-4C, then it is good to go for 
the TJ8 DX-pedition coming up next.

God I Love that Sherwood R-4C.
Don Jones KO7i
Arlington, WA



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Looking for 12.6 mHz or 12.9 mHz Xtal for T-4XC (160 Mtr)

2011-01-30 Thread Jim Bo
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Solved T-4XC Loss of Pwr and Side Tone issue

2011-01-30 Thread Jim Bo
Thanks to ALL and everyone for help with this month old problem.  The 160 meter 
CW contest drove me over the edge with my TS-480 on receive, and had to sort 
out the C line xmitter issue so I could easily use the R-4C, or be in the 
depths of AGC pumping for the weekend.

Took a hair dryer and heated the under chassis area of V9 (Osc) and V7 (Amp) on 
T-4XC and initially the problem did not arise.

I continued to heat to the point I was concerned it was getting to hot, and the 
output power went to zero and sidetone was gone.

I sprayed "freeze it" on the componenets in the area of V9 and V7 and no change.

I then wiggled V9 and noticed the power was intermittent.  I replaced tube and 
had the same issue.  I resoldered all solder joints on V9 and still had the 
same issue.

I took a "pick" and "adjusted" the pins of the tube socket and the problem was 
solved.

Occam's Razor babyjust Occam's Razor!

Jim
WA9ZBV

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] T-4XC Problem has come back............................

2010-11-28 Thread Jim Bo
Well, a few hours into CQWW CWDX 
contest, the xmitter started to act up 
again.


Seems to be temp related also.

I lose the sidetone and the xmitter will 
not go into xmit when I hit the CW key.


I also found that the spot function does 
not work.


If I key the xmitter with an external 
foot switch, the spot function works, 
but the xmitter will not go into the
transmit mode and the side tone does 
not.


I was working the contest with the 
receiver in the "ON" position so I could 
get sidetone, as the keyer

I have does not have a sidetone on it.

Any other ideas on where to look?

Garey, I need to re-read yours, but no 
longer have it, can you re-send?


Thanks to all

Jim (just recovering from a turkey coma)
WA9ZBV 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] T-4XC Oscillation and tone problem solved.

2010-11-27 Thread Jim Bo

Curt,

I want something around 6 volts or so DC 
so the fan will run slower and quite. 
Pin 3 and 4 is the filament for a 6AU6A 
tube, with pin 4 grounded at the tube 
socket.


As soon as I disconneted the "circuit", 
the oscillation went away, the raspy 
tone on received signals on the R-4C 
with the injection cable connnected went 
away and the sidetone came up in voulme. 
The fan draws less than 300 mils of 
current.


Jim


- Original Message - 
From: "Curt Nixon" 

To: "Jim Bo" 
Cc: 
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 7:20 
AM
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] T-4XC 
Oscillation and tone problem solved.



I dont have a c version schematic 
but...


In my fan rectifier adventures, I 
found that the drakes use a 12V CT 
filament winding..the CT is grounded 
..the 12V tubes are across the whole 
winding...So you cannot ground one 
side of the rectifier/fan voltage.


If you go from ground to one side of 
the winding, you only get 6.3V.


I let the 12V fan and rectifier 
float..ie niether side is connected to 
ground.  Works fine.


What is different in the "c" version?

Curt
KU8L


Jim Bo wrote:

Guys,

Thanks for eveyones help with the 
subject matter.


The culprit for both of the problems 
was due to a circuit I added
for a external fan supply.  I went 
across the heater of V7 (Pin 3 and 
Pin 4)
with a simple half wave rectifier 
circuit with 150 uF of cap for a 
filter. Pin 4 is at ground
potential, so the diode was hanging 
off Pin 3.  I ran this "supply 
voltage"
to a 12 volt dc fan that was used to 
cool the final cage.


For reasons unknown, the 
'oscillation" problem AND the poor 
receive tone when
just the injection cable connected 
was due to this half wave rectifier 
circuit.


After removal of the circuit, all is 
back to normal, sidetone is back and 
solid,
no oscillation and no funny T6 (Tone 
6) when the injection cable was 
connected.


Now, tomorrow morning, I will kick 
around 15M and 20M on CQWW DX test CW

with the "new" rig.

Thanks for eveyones help!

Jim
WA9ZBV

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist







___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] T-4XC Oscillation and tone problem solved.

2010-11-26 Thread Jim Bo

Guys,

Thanks for eveyones help with the 
subject matter.


The culprit for both of the problems was 
due to a circuit I added
for a external fan supply.  I went 
across the heater of V7 (Pin 3 and Pin 
4)
with a simple half wave rectifier 
circuit with 150 uF of cap for a filter. 
Pin 4 is at ground
potential, so the diode was hanging off 
Pin 3.  I ran this "supply voltage"
to a 12 volt dc fan that was used to 
cool the final cage.


For reasons unknown, the 'oscillation" 
problem AND the poor receive tone when
just the injection cable connected was 
due to this half wave rectifier circuit.


After removal of the circuit, all is 
back to normal, sidetone is back and 
solid,
no oscillation and no funny T6 (Tone 6) 
when the injection cable was connected.


Now, tomorrow morning, I will kick 
around 15M and 20M on CQWW DX test CW

with the "new" rig.

Thanks for eveyones help!

Jim
WA9ZBV 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] T4-XC "Oscillation" problem solved.........Poor tone still needs to be investigated

2010-11-25 Thread Jim Bo

Guys,

Thanks for all the suggestions to fix 
the issue.  I know some of you just came 
out of a turkey coma to offer 
suggestions.
I myself am about to enter a coma myself 
as the bird and fix'ens are almost 
ready.


I tried the easiest recommendations and 
swapped the two 6UA6A's and the problem 
went away.  Need to dig into the junk 
box

and find a couple or order them.

Did some measurements prior to entering 
a turky coma and results are below. 
Dummy load was used, Welz watt meter,
and the T-4XC plate current meter and 
they all have their (unknown) 
inaccuracies.  I measured plate current 
and output power
at various positions of the "Gain" 
setting on the xmitter, so 
for what it is worth and 
hoping the format works):


20 meters

 Tune Position  CW Position
 Gain Setting (o'clock)  P out (W) 
Plate Current (mA)  P out (W) Plate 
Current (mA)

 9  10 120  0.4 70
 10  65 240  0.4 70
 11  130 320  0.4 70
 12  165 350  1.5 80
 1  175 360  5 100
 2  175 360  20 160
 3  175 360  115 310
 4  175 360  200 200
 5  175 360  200 200



15 Meters

 Tune Position  CW Position
 Gain Setting (o'clock)  P out (W) 
Plate Current (mA)  P out (W) Plate 
Current (mA)

 9  13 120  0.5 70
 10  75 260  0.5 70
 11  150 340  0.5 70
 12  160 360  1 70
 1  160 360  5 80
 2  160 360  25 110
 3  160 360  150 170
 4  160 360  180 360
 5  160 360  180 410





Jim WA9ZBV 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Drakelist Digest, Vol 29, Issue 30

2010-11-25 Thread Jim Bo
Guys,

Thanks for the ideas.  I checked the ripple and regulation on the PSU, but will 
check again and post the no load and full load readings.

I was not clear in the other post.

I will be listening to a CW signal on the air with the R-4C, and when I turn on 
the xmitter with all cables attached between xmitter and rcvr,  the signal from 
the other station that was a Tone 9 now becomes a Tone 6 (RST).  If I remove 
the JUST the injection cable. all is well.  Just connecting the injection cable 
causes this.  All other interconnnect cables are connected.  When I go to the 
"spot" postion, the spot signal when in cw, is also raspy with Tone 6.

Now, if I turn the transcieve know to receiver, the tone is normal in the 
receiver.  

If I turn the transceiver knob to xmtr, the receive sensitivity goes down 6 
S-units!

All othe interconnect cables are connected, the injection line is causing these 
issues.

Comments??

Thoughts and Happy Tnxgiving to ALL!!

Jim
WA9ZBV

 




> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Further info on T-4XC issue (Jim Bo)
>   2. Re: Another T-4XC Question (Garey Barrell)
>   3. More Info on T-4XC (Jim Bo)
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:14:05 -0800
> From: "Jim Bo" 
> To: 
> Subject: [Drakelist] Further info on T-4XC issue
> Message-ID: <1404ce2cfd0540f0b431dc33aefd4...@jdesk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
> reply-type=original
> 
> Hooked up my dummy load and in CW mode, 
> found the following:
> 
> At full output, it takes about 2 minutes 
> before it goes into an "oscillation" 
> mode.  Again, if I key the xmitter using 
> external switch, output power stays at 
> 140 watts.  When I "unkey" the xmitter, 
> it goes into the oscillation mode.
> 
> If I REDUCE the output power to 50 
> watts, the xmitter does NOT "oscillate". 
> I have left the xmitter at 50 watts out 
> for 10 minutes and there is no issue. 
> As soon as I raise the output power to 
> greater thna 70 watts into the dummy 
> load, the xmitter "oscillates" between 
> transmitting and not transmitting.
> 
> Thought?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jim
> WA9ZBV 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:30:46 -0500
> From: Garey Barrell 
> To: drakelist 
> Subject: Re: [Drakelist] Another T-4XC Question
> Message-ID: <4cec0856.2030...@mindspring.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Hi Jim -
> 
> Some further information on the "oscillating" xmitter.  With the key 
> down and in the CW position, with gain pot at max, the xmitter 
> "oscillates" with one second not xmitting, two seconds xmitting with 
> full power out. The anti vox pot setting will vary the frequency of 
> "oscillation".
> 
> This sounds like a 'gassy' 6EV7/6FQ7.  It MAY be C107 in the 
> transmitter.  The DC integrated in C99 'competes' with the DC integrated 
> in C93 for control of the Grid of V10b.  There are several large value 
> carbon comp resistors involved, which may have gone up in value, 
> disturbing the 'balance of power'.  A leaky CR13 and/or CR16 can also 
> upset things.  Leaky caps in either of these positions could be a 
> problem, but I have seen VERY few cap problems.
>>
>> Now, if I key (not the cw key) the transmitter with an external 
>> switch, the output power is full and of course the xmitter does not 
>> "oscillate" but stays in the xmit mode as expected.  When I use the 
>> external switch to unkey the xmitter, it goes into the "oscillation 
>> mode again.
> 
> CR17 / C115 generate a 'pulse' when the key is first closed to yank the 
> relay closed quickly to avoid the 'dropped first dot' problem.  So the 
> relay pulls in, but relies on the voltage integrated in C99 to 'hold' it 
> in.
>>
>> I also have a question on the gain pot. It has always been 
>> "non-linear" in that it does not start to produce power until about 
>> the 1 o'clock position when in the tune positon.
> 
> The GAIN pot is actually two sections.  In TUNE position the MIC gain 
> section varies the SIDETONE level applied to the Grid of V9b where it is 
> amplified, rectified and integrated in C99.  (See above).  A leaky diode 
> at CR15, which 'keys' the sidetone for CW via control of R84/R85 vs 
> R101/R102 can cause a reduced level vs pot rotation.  Again, high value 
> resistors are suspect, which will alter the balance.  The GAIN control 
> should reach full ou

[Drakelist] T-4XC Plot Thickens

2010-11-24 Thread Jim Bo
Hooked up the rcvr to the xmitter with 
all the patch cords and something really 
weird is going on.


When connected together the cw signals 
in the R-4C become REAL raspy, about a 
T6 on the RST scale!  Very poor.


Now if I remove only the inj cable, the 
tone goes back to normal.  I have also 
noted that the receiver takes MUCH 
longer to come back on line after you 
release the xmit button.  It is not the 
relay, but rather it sounds like 
something is discharging with a RC time 
constant as the receiver gets its ears 
back.


Comments?

Tnx

Jim 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] More Info on T-4XC

2010-11-23 Thread Jim Bo

Well,

Left T-4XC on xmit in CW position with 
50 watts out into dummy load for 20 
minutes and the xmitter did NOT 
cycle/oscillate at all.


As soon as I turned up the output power 
to 70 watts, the xmitter 
cycled/oscillated between 70 watts out 
for 2 seconds, then zero watts out for 
one second with the T/R relay switching 
correctly.


I do not have access to a tube checker, 
not sure if it is a tube or


Thanks in advance


Jim
WA9ZBV 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Further info on T-4XC issue

2010-11-23 Thread Jim Bo
Hooked up my dummy load and in CW mode, 
found the following:


At full output, it takes about 2 minutes 
before it goes into an "oscillation" 
mode.  Again, if I key the xmitter using 
external switch, output power stays at 
140 watts.  When I "unkey" the xmitter, 
it goes into the oscillation mode.


If I REDUCE the output power to 50 
watts, the xmitter does NOT "oscillate". 
I have left the xmitter at 50 watts out 
for 10 minutes and there is no issue. 
As soon as I raise the output power to 
greater thna 70 watts into the dummy 
load, the xmitter "oscillates" between 
transmitting and not transmitting.


Thought?

Thanks

Jim
WA9ZBV 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Another T-4XC Question

2010-11-23 Thread Jim Bo
Some further information on the 
"oscillating" xmitter.  With the key 
down and in the CW position, with gain 
pot at max, the xmitter "oscillates" 
with one second not xmitting, two 
seconds xmitting with full power out. 
The anti vox pot setting will vary the 
frequency of "oscillation".


Now, if I key (not the cw key) the 
transmitter with an external switch, the 
output power is full and of course the 
xmitter does not "oscillate" but stays 
in the xmit mode as expected.  When I 
use the external switch to unkey the 
xmitter, it goes into the "oscillation 
mode again.


I also have a question on the gain pot. 
It has always been "non-linear" in that 
it does not start to produce power until 
about the 1 o'clock position when in the 
tune positon.


When in the CW position and the rig 
keyed with CW key, there is output power 
(5 watts) when the gain pot is at zero. 
When you advance the gain pot, the 
output power DROPS to zero watts at 
about the 9 o'clock position, and then 
stays there until the 1 o'clock 
position.  Is this typical?


Output power is good with 140 to 150 
watts watts out on 40M with 300 mils of 
plate current and 100 watts on 10 meters 
with less than 300 mils of plate 
current.


Comments from the gang??

Thanks in advance

Jim
WA9ZBV 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] T-4XC problem

2010-11-22 Thread Jim Bo
Fixed the power "fade" (went from 120 
watts to 80 watts within 5 seconds) by 
rebuilding the AC-4.  All is well with 
the power supply, voltages are correct 
and ripple is good.


What started the project was the fact 
the the xmitter, when in CW, with key 
down, I would get output power for two 
seconds.  Then the transmitter would 
quit xmitting (heard relay click) for 1 
second, then xmit for 2 seconds, then 
stop xmitting for 1 second.  Just sat 
there and "oscillated from output power 
to no output power (relay clicking every 
time).  The frequency of this can be 
changed by cranking on the anti vox pot.


I cleaned relay contacts, and rotary 
switch contacts to no avail.  I searched 
the web and saw someone else with a 
similar problem, but the thread never 
did reach a conclusion that the problem 
was fixed.


Comments from the gang??

Tnx

Jim
WA9ZBV 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Drake R-4C and T-4XC frequency problem when in transceive mode

2010-10-02 Thread Jim Bo


- Original Message - 
From: "Jim Bo" 

To: 
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 10:28 PM
Subject: Drake R-4C and T-4XC frequency problem when in transceive mode


Sorry for long post, but this will be a BIG issue for me for November 
SweepStakes CW.


I have a problem which is noted when my R-4C is paired with the T-4XC.  I 
tune in a CW station with the R-4C, switch a Sherwood 600 Hz roofing and 
250 Hz filter and adjust the passband to clearly copy the station.  As you 
know, with the 250 Hz filter, at 700 Hz, the signal is on the skirt of the 
filter and is down significantly (or even out of the passband).  The 
frequency of the audio of the CW signal needs to be in the 500Hz (plus / 
minus) range to be able to hear the station.  I also prefer a 500Hz "tone" 
when receiving CW.  I then "spot" the xmitter to the same frequency such 
that I can hear the spot signal in the tight passband.  The receiver and 
xmitter is on the same frequency and the other station can hear me just 
fine when I transmit.


The problem arises when I use the R-4C PTO as the master oscillator 
(tranceive mode).  I can tune in an external carrier generated by a 
Kenwood transceiver on the R-4C such that is in the passband and is solid 
copy.  I then use a completely different receiver (Drake R8B) to receive 
the same carrier(using different antenna of course) such that it is in the 
R8B passband and at the same tone (500 Hz).  I use a Timewave 599ZX with 
center frequency set at 500 Hz and the bandwidth knob to10 (ten) Hz for 
the three conditions below.  Very Narrow Audio!


If I then:

1. Turn T-4XC to spot mode (xmitter osc.), tune the mxitter VFO so the 
spot signal can clearly be heard on both the R-4C and the R8B, and through 
the Timewave.  No Problem.
2.  Transmit carrier with the T-4XC xmitter (xmitter is master ocs.), I 
can clearly hear the T-4XC xmitter on both the R-4C and the R8B, and 
through the Timewave.  No Problem.
3.  If I then turn the switch so the R-4C is the master oscillator 
(transceive mode), transmit a carrier, and listen to the R8B, the signal 
is no longer in the passband! Problem.  I need to tune the R8B lower in 
frequency by 300 Hz to hear the carrier.


The 300 Hz difference is significant and I do not get return calls when 
using the C-Line in transceive mode.  If I spot the T-4XC and call the 
station then, I get return calls.


I checked the carrier oscillator signal from both the R-4C and T-4XC and 
they are within 18 Hz of each other.


I do recall having this issue before when I first got the C-line "back in 
the day" and did an adjustment to one of the rigs such that the receive 
and transmit frequence were the same when using the R-4C as the master 
oscillator (transceive mode), but do not recall what I adjusted.


Any and all help / comments greatly appreciated.

Jim
WA9ZBV 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Drake R-4C and T-4XC frequency problem when in transceive mode

2010-10-01 Thread Jim Bo
Sorry for long post, but this will be a BIG issue for me for November 
SweepStakes CW.


I have a problem which is noted when my R-4C is paired with the T-4XC.  I 
tune in a CW station with the R-4C, switch a Sherwood 600 Hz roofing and 250 
Hz filter and adjust the passband to clearly copy the station.  As you know, 
with the 250 Hz filter, at 700 Hz, the signal is on the skirt of the filter 
and is down significantly (or even out of the passband).  The frequency of 
the audio of the CW signal needs to be in the 500Hz (plus / minus) range to 
be able to hear the station.  I also prefer a 500Hz "tone" when receiving 
CW.  I then "spot" the xmitter to the same frequency such that I can hear 
the spot signal in the tight passband.  The receiver and xmitter is on the 
same frequency and the other station can hear me just fine when I transmit.


The problem arises when I use the R-4C PTO as the master oscillator 
(tranceive mode).  I can tune in an external carrier generated by a Kenwood 
transceiver on the R-4C such that is in the passband and is solid copy.  I 
then use a completely different receiver (Drake R8B) to receive the same 
carrier(using different antenna of course) such that it is in the R8B 
passband and at the same tone (500 Hz).  I use a Timewave 599ZX with center 
frequency set at 500 Hz and the bandwidth knob to10 (ten) Hz for the three 
conditions below.  Very Narrow Audio!


If I then:

1. Turn T-4XC to spot mode (xmitter osc.), tune the mxitter VFO so the spot 
signal can clearly be heard on both the R-4C and the R8B, and through the 
Timewave.  No Problem.
2.  Transmit carrier with the T-4XC xmitter (xmitter is master ocs.), I can 
clearly hear the T-4XC xmitter on both the R-4C and the R8B, and through the 
Timewave.  No Problem.
3.  If I then turn the switch so the R-4C is the master oscillator 
(transceive mode), transmit a carrier, and listen to the R8B, the signal is 
no longer in the passband! Problem.  I need to tune the R8B lower in 
frequency by 300 Hz to hear the carrier.


The 300 Hz difference is significant and I do not get return calls when 
using the C-Line in transceive mode.  If I spot the T-4XC and call the 
station then, I get return calls.


I checked the carrier oscillator signal from both the R-4C and T-4XC and 
they are within 18 Hz of each other.


I do recall having this issue before when I first got the C-line "back in 
the day" and did an adjustment to one of the rigs such that the receive and 
transmit frequence were the same when using the R-4C as the master 
oscillator (transceive mode), but do not recall what I adjusted.


Any and all help / comments greatly appreciated.

Jim
WA9ZBV 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Drake 4 C-line side tone when operating CW

2010-09-04 Thread Jim Bo

I  prefer a "lower than normal" pitch/freq when digging out a CW signal out
of the noise or adjacent CW signals.

I am using a Timewave DSP-599ZX.  The tone that I "prefer" is centered at
430 Hz or so.  Also, the 250 Hz I.F. crystal filter I have works best at
430Hz signal tone.

Question, how do I adjust the sidetone of the T-4XC so it will fall into
bandpass of the Timewave filter centered at 480Hz.  Currently the side tone
is at 600 Hz +/-, so when I transmit with the Timewave in line (set at
430Hz), I cannot hear the side tone or my keying.

Also is there an adjustment to assure that when I am using the R-4C as the
master oscillator (i.e. transceiver  mode with R-4C as the controlling
oscillator) I am in fact transmitting on the same frequency that I am
listening to (again I tune so I hear a 430Hz CW signal using the R-4C)?

Thanks in advance

Jim
WA9ZBV


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Drake 4 C-line side tone when operating CW

2010-08-29 Thread Jim Bo
I prefer a "lower than normal" pitch/freq when digging out a CW signal out 
of the noise or adjacent CW signals.


I am using a Timewave DSP-599ZX.  The tone that I "prefer" is centered at 
480 Hz or so.  Also, the 250 Hz I.F. crystal filter I have works best at 
480Hz signal tone.


Question, how do I adjust the sidetone of the T-4XC so it will fall into 
bandpass of the Timewave filter centered at 480Hz.  Currently the side tone 
is at 600 Hz +/-, so when I transmit with the Timewave in line (set at 
480Hz), I cannot hear the side tone or my keying.


Also is there an adjustment to assure that when I am using the R-4C as the 
master oscillator (i.e. transceiver  mode with R-4C as the controlling 
oscillator) I am infact transmitting on the same frequency that I am 
listening to (again I tune so I hear a 480Hz CW signal using the R-4C)?


Thanks in advance

Jim
WA9ZBV 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] R-4C Plastic Dials

2010-08-21 Thread Jim Bo

I have a R-4C tht is is need of a "kHz dial" (the one that goes 0-90").

Any ideas?

Also, are the dials in a T-4XC the same and be substituted?

Also, will the dials work regardless if there is one or two metal levers 
that are use to adjust the dials to the correct frequency?


Thanks

Jim 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist