[Dri-devel] Re: new DRI resume binary snapshots and patches available

2002-12-11 Thread Juan Quintela
 charl == Charl P Botha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Hi

charl New binary snapshots of the DRI suspend/resume modified Radeon drivers are
charl available at http://cpbotha.net/dri_resume.html - these are the first DRI
charl suspend/resume driver snapshots since the merge of XFree86 HEAD into the DRI
charl tree. The updated patches are of course also available at the mentioned URL.

could you told me what X version against are your dri
patches?

I am having a bad time (not being an XFree hacker) to merge the X part
of your patch (the kernel patch was a no brainer).

Basically my problem is that there is not:
- ati/radeon_common.h file (and I didn't found any of the other
  DRM_RADEON_* diffs).
- in the radeon_dri.c::RADEONDRIResume() has a call to
  +_ret = drmCommandNone(info-drmFD, DRM_RADEON_CP_RESUME); 

  I am completely unable to find that command in my XFree tree :(

I am using XFree86-4.2.1-11mdk.  We used the gatos patch, but old ati
code don't have either that function :(

Any help or advice on where can I found the CVS change where the
drmCommandNone was introduced is welcome.  I looked at the Changelogs
and see no mention of that changes :(

Later, Juan.

-- 
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they 
are different -- Larry McVoy


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility 
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel



[Dri-devel] Re: [Swsusp] Re: new DRI resume binary snapshots and patchesavailable

2002-12-11 Thread Charl P. Botha
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 10:38, Juan Quintela wrote:
 could you told me what X version against are your dri
 patches?
 
 I am having a bad time (not being an XFree hacker) to merge the X part
 of your patch (the kernel patch was a no brainer).
 
 Basically my problem is that there is not:
 - ati/radeon_common.h file (and I didn't found any of the other
   DRM_RADEON_* diffs).
 - in the radeon_dri.c::RADEONDRIResume() has a call to
   +_ret = drmCommandNone(info-drmFD, DRM_RADEON_CP_RESUME); 
 
   I am completely unable to find that command in my XFree tree :(
 
 I am using XFree86-4.2.1-11mdk.  We used the gatos patch, but old ati
 code don't have either that function :(

I have clarified the web page (http://cpbotha.net/dri_resume.html)
somewhat.  The patch is very specifically for DRI CVS and NOT for
4.2.x.  I don't think it'll work on 4.2.1 to tell you the truth.

Soon I am going to make sure that it applies cleanly on XFree86 HEAD CVS
as well for possible submission into the repository.  Those will be your
two options then: either XFree86 DRI CVS or XFree86 HEAD CVS.

Thanks,
Charl

-- 
charl p. botha http://cpbotha.net/ http://visualisation.tudelft.nl/


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility 
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel



[Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?

2002-12-11 Thread Nicolas ASPERT
Margit Schubert-While wrote:

 From drivers/char/agp/agpgart_be.c
4554,4559
{ PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_845_G_0,
 PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
 INTEL_I845_G,
 Intel,
 i845G,
 intel_830mp_setup },

Surely this is wrong or ?
Should be intel_845_setup, I think.



IIRC, the 845G is a new version of the 830MP chipset (it had been
added by Abraham vd Merwe  Graeme Fisher some months ago), but acts
basically just as the 830MP. Therefore the entry is correct Or maybe
if it gets confusing adding a comment would not hurt...



Also in drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h, the switch statement at 262 
is missing the
cases for INTEL_I830_M, INTEL_I845_G.


That's true. It is also missing in 2.5.51.
I attach two patches, one for 2.4.21-pre1 and one for 2.5.51 that should 
fix this.


Regards

Nicolas.


diff -ru linux-2.4.21-pre1.clean/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h 
linux-2.4.21-pre1/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h
--- linux-2.4.21-pre1.clean/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h   Wed Dec 11 12:36:58 
2002
+++ linux-2.4.21-pre1/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h Wed Dec 11 12:42:34 2002
@@ -267,8 +267,10 @@
case INTEL_I810:head-chipset = Intel i810;break;
case INTEL_I815:head-chipset = Intel i815;break;
case INTEL_I820:head-chipset = Intel i820;break;
+   case INTEL_I830_M:  head-chipset = Intel i830M;   break;
case INTEL_I840:head-chipset = Intel i840;break;
case INTEL_I845:head-chipset = Intel i845;break;
+   case INTEL_I845_G:  head-chipset = Intel i845G;   break;
case INTEL_I850:head-chipset = Intel i850;break;
 
case VIA_GENERIC:   head-chipset = VIA;   break;

diff -ru linux-2.5.51.clean/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h 
linux-2.5.51/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h
--- linux-2.5.51.clean/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.hTue Dec 10 03:45:39 
2002
+++ linux-2.5.51/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h  Wed Dec 11 12:55:08 2002
@@ -271,10 +271,12 @@
 #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x02040f /* KERNEL_VERSION(2,4,15) */
case INTEL_I820:head-chipset = Intel i820;break;
 #endif
+   case INTEL_I830_M:  head-chipset = Intel i830M;   break;
case INTEL_I840:head-chipset = Intel i840;break;
 #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x02040f /* KERNEL_VERSION(2,4,15) */
case INTEL_I845:head-chipset = Intel i845;break;
 #endif
+   case INTEL_I845:head-chipset = Intel i845G;   break;
case INTEL_I850:head-chipset = Intel i850;break;
case INTEL_460GX:   head-chipset = Intel 460GX;   break;
 



[Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?

2002-12-11 Thread Nicolas ASPERT
Ooops... the patch I sent for 2.5.51 is wrong, since there I added a 
INTEL_I845 instead of a INTEL_I845_G (I know vim *does* weird things in 
my back 8-)

Here is the correct one...

Regards

Nicolas.
--
Nicolas Aspert  Signal Processing Institute (ITS)
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL)
diff -ru linux-2.5.51.clean/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h 
linux-2.5.51/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h
--- linux-2.5.51.clean/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.hTue Dec 10 03:45:39 
2002
+++ linux-2.5.51/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h  Wed Dec 11 12:55:08 2002
@@ -271,10 +271,12 @@
 #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x02040f /* KERNEL_VERSION(2,4,15) */
case INTEL_I820:head-chipset = Intel i820;break;
 #endif
+   case INTEL_I830_M:  head-chipset = Intel i830M;   break;
case INTEL_I840:head-chipset = Intel i840;break;
 #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x02040f /* KERNEL_VERSION(2,4,15) */
case INTEL_I845:head-chipset = Intel i845;break;
 #endif
+   case INTEL_I845_G:  head-chipset = Intel i845G;   break;
case INTEL_I850:head-chipset = Intel i850;break;
case INTEL_460GX:   head-chipset = Intel 460GX;   break;
 



[Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?

2002-12-11 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:07:45PM +0100, Nicolas ASPERT wrote:
  IIRC, the 845G is a new version of the 830MP chipset (it had been
  added by Abraham vd Merwe  Graeme Fisher some months ago), but acts
  basically just as the 830MP. Therefore the entry is correct Or maybe
  if it gets confusing adding a comment would not hurt...

I'll check the chipset docs when I get time, and add a comment if
necessary. No-one seems to be complaining that it isn't working,
so I'm inclined to believe your diagnosis is correct.

   Also in drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h, the switch statement at 262 
   is missing the
   cases for INTEL_I830_M, INTEL_I845_G.
  That's true. It is also missing in 2.5.51.
  I attach two patches, one for 2.4.21-pre1 and one for 2.5.51 that should 
  fix this.
  diff -ru linux-2.5.51.clean/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h 
 linux-2.5.51/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h
  --- linux-2.5.51.clean/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h Tue Dec 10 03:45:39 2002
  +++ linux-2.5.51/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h   Wed Dec 11 12:55:08 2002
  @@ -271,10 +271,12 @@
   #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x02040f /* KERNEL_VERSION(2,4,15) */
   case INTEL_I820:head-chipset = Intel i820;break;
   #endif
  +case INTEL_I830_M:  head-chipset = Intel i830M;   break;
   case INTEL_I840:head-chipset = Intel i840;break;
   #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x02040f /* KERNEL_VERSION(2,4,15) */
   case INTEL_I845:head-chipset = Intel i845;break;
   #endif
  +case INTEL_I845:head-chipset = Intel i845G;   break;
   case INTEL_I850:head-chipset = Intel i850;break;
   case INTEL_460GX:   head-chipset = Intel 460GX;   break;

DRI folks, this seems like duplication given that this data is available
in agpgart. How about changing this to read whatever agpgart has set in
.chipset_name ?

Keeping these two lists in sync seems somewhat pointless.

Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility 
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel



[Dri-devel] [,,,,°µ, ][]

2002-12-11 Thread
Title: ¿ø°íÁß°³, ÀÚºñÃâÆÇ, ÀÚ¼­Àü, ±âȹÃâÆÇ µî ÃâÆǼ­ºñ½º Àü¹®È¸»ç








ÀÚºñÃâÆÇ ¾È³»(½ÃÁý,¼öÇÊ,¼Ò¼³,°æÁ¦,°æ¿µ,ó¼¼,±âŸ)



dri-devel´Ô²² 
ÇູÀÌ ÇÔ²²ÇϽñ⸦ º÷´Ï´Ù.±ÍÇÏÀÇ 
¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò´Â À¥¼­ÇÎÁß¿¡¼­ ¾Ë°Ô µÈ°ÍÀ̸ç, E-Mail ÁÖ¼Ò ¿Ü¿¡, ´Ù¸¥ 
Á¤º¸´Â °®°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù. º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ 
µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ[±¤°í] ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù
¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ¿øÇϽøé 
¿©±â¸¦ Ŭ¸¯Çϱ⸸ 
Çϼ¼¿ä~
 
[ÀÚºñÃâÆÇÀÇ 
ÀÚ¼¼ÇÑ ³»¿ë]







ÀúÀ۱ǻçÇ×



ÀúÀÚÀÇ 
»ç»ó°ú öÇÐÀ» ´ã¾Æ Ç°À§Àִ åÀ¸·Î ¸¸µé¾î 
µå¸³´Ï´Ù. 
ÃâÆǵî·Ï°ú 
±¹Á¦ ¹®Çå¹øÈ£(ISBN)¸¦ ºÎ¿©ÇØ µå¸³´Ï´Ù. 

±¹¸³Áß¾Óµµ¼­°ü¿¡ 
³³º»ÇÏ¿© ¾ðÁ¦¶óµµ ¿­¶÷ÇÏ½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. 

ÀúÀÛ±ÇÀ» 
öÀúÇÏ°Ô º¸ÀåÇÕ´Ï´Ù.





Á¦ÀÛ¹æ¹ý



³ë·ÃÇÑ 
¿î¿µÀ¸·Î Á¦ÀÛºñ¸¦ ÃÖ´ëÇÑ Àý¾àÇÏ¿© Àú·ÅÇÑ 
ºñ¿ëÀÌ µì´Ï´Ù. 
öÀúÇÏ°Ô 
ÀúÀÚÀÇ Àǵµ¸¦ 100% ¹Ý¿µÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
º»¹®°ú 
Ç¥ÁöÀÇ ±³Á¤Áö¸¦ ÃÖ¼ÒÇÑ µÎ ¹ø ÀÌ»ó º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. 

ÀúÀÚÀÇ 
OK»çÀÎÀÌ ³ª¾ß¸¸ Á¦ÀÛ¿¡ µé¾î°©´Ï´Ù. 
°ø°ÝÀûÀÎ 
°æ¿µÀ¸·Î °Å·¡¼­Á¡À» ÇÏ·çµµ ºüÁöÁö ¾Ê°í 
¹æ¹®ÇÏ¿© µµ¼­ÀÇ Áø¿­»óŸ¦ ¼ö½Ã·Î Á¡°ËÇÏ°í, 
´õ¿í ÁÁÀº ÀÚ¸®¿¡ Áø¿­µÉ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÃÖ¼±À» 
´ÙÇÕ´Ï´Ù. 





Àμ¼ 
°è¾à¹æ½Ä



óÀ½ 
Á¦ÀÛºñÀÇ ÀϺθ¦ ÀúÀÚ°¡ ºÎ´ãÇÏ´Â °Í ¿Ü¿¡ 
ÀÏ¹Ý ÃâÆǹ°°ú µ¿ÀÏÇÑ °è¾à
Ãß°¡ºñ¿ë 
ÀüÇô ¾øÀ¸¸ç Ã¥ÀÌ Àß Æȸ®¸é ÀúÀÚ¿¡°Ô 
Àμ¼¸¦ Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î Áö±Þ
10% 
¼±Àμ¼





ÀÚ¼¼ÇÑ 
»çÇ×Àº µµ¼­ÃâÆÇ ÀÛÀº½£¿¡¼­ 
»ìÆ캸½Ã±â ¹Ù¶ø´Ï´Ù.


µµ¼­ÃâÆÇ ÀÛÀº½£








[Dri-devel] get it!

2002-12-11 Thread andreagill5540
  YOU CAN LOOK AND FEEL YOUNGER !!! INCREASE ENERGY / ENDURANCE! LOSE WEIGHT  BUILD  MUSCLE at the same time!MEN:   Increase Lean Muscle Mass Reduce Body Fat Increase Exercise Performance Increase Muscle Strength  Increase
  EnduranceWOMEN:  Reduce  Control Body FatImprove Skin Tone  ElasticityIncrease Exercise PerformanceReduce Fatigue Improve  Balance MoodIncrease Energy QUALITY- HGH Find Out More: CLICK  If you prefer not to receive future promotional e-mails from Quality -HGH or it's affiliate companies,
please click here. It may take up to 3
business days to completely remove 
 you from our e-mail list.Copyright
© 2002 Quality HGH. All rights reserved



7736Ql5†+,~w­zf¢–+,¦‰ì¢·o%¢¶«y«O£«
‰ž°jÞjÔ^²š'²&â–+r-櫞Ú.±ì¨ººhÁêÚ´äƒ6Áâ‚Þ­ú+™©Üx*&¦ëbž¡jyޖm§ÿá¥Ç^½ÈZžw¥¢¸?¸z÷¥™¨¥Šx%ŠËC®'^½éeŠËl²‹«qç讧zØm¶›?þX¬¶Ë(º·~Šàzw­þX¬¶ÏåŠËbú?v¸z÷¥

[Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?

2002-12-11 Thread Nicolas ASPERT
Dave Jones wrote:


I'll check the chipset docs when I get time, and add a comment if
necessary. No-one seems to be complaining that it isn't working,
so I'm inclined to believe your diagnosis is correct.



I found the thread of lkml containing the discussion about that ... here 
is the link to the original mail :

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=102122146829865w=2

DRI folks, this seems like duplication given that this data is available
in agpgart. How about changing this to read whatever agpgart has set in
.chipset_name ?



Sounds like a good idea to me ;-)

Best regards
Nicolas.
--
Nicolas Aspert  Signal Processing Institute (ITS)
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL)



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility 
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel


Re: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?

2002-12-11 Thread Keith Whitwell
Dave Jones wrote:

On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:07:45PM +0100, Nicolas ASPERT wrote:
  IIRC, the 845G is a new version of the 830MP chipset (it had been
  added by Abraham vd Merwe  Graeme Fisher some months ago), but acts
  basically just as the 830MP. Therefore the entry is correct Or maybe
  if it gets confusing adding a comment would not hurt...

I'll check the chipset docs when I get time, and add a comment if
necessary. No-one seems to be complaining that it isn't working,
so I'm inclined to believe your diagnosis is correct.

   Also in drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h, the switch statement at 262 
   is missing the
   cases for INTEL_I830_M, INTEL_I845_G.
  That's true. It is also missing in 2.5.51.
  I attach two patches, one for 2.4.21-pre1 and one for 2.5.51 that should 
  fix this.
  diff -ru linux-2.5.51.clean/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h linux-2.5.51/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h
  --- linux-2.5.51.clean/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h	Tue Dec 10 03:45:39 2002
  +++ linux-2.5.51/drivers/char/drm/drm_agpsupport.h	Wed Dec 11 12:55:08 2002
  @@ -271,10 +271,12 @@
   #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x02040f /* KERNEL_VERSION(2,4,15) */
   	 	case INTEL_I820:	head-chipset = Intel i820;	 break;
   #endif
  +		case INTEL_I830_M:	head-chipset = Intel i830M;	 break;
   		case INTEL_I840:	head-chipset = Intel i840;break;
   #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x02040f /* KERNEL_VERSION(2,4,15) */
   		case INTEL_I845:	head-chipset = Intel i845;break;
   #endif
  +		case INTEL_I845:	head-chipset = Intel i845G;	 break;
   		case INTEL_I850:	head-chipset = Intel i850;	 break;
   		case INTEL_460GX:	head-chipset = Intel 460GX;	 break;

DRI folks, this seems like duplication given that this data is available
in agpgart. How about changing this to read whatever agpgart has set in
.chipset_name ?

Keeping these two lists in sync seems somewhat pointless.

Yes, it's not even clear what particular use the string is.  It looks like 
it's just for the print statement at the bottom of the switch.  It would be 
safe to remove the whole thing -- agpgart has already printed out what 
hardware *it's* dealing with.

Keith





---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility 
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel


RE: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?

2002-12-11 Thread Alexander Stohr
Title: RE: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?





Accoding to the official Linux pci database at 
 http://www.yourvote.com 
the strings in the table should be:


 INTEL_I845,
 Intel,
 i845 E/MP/MZ,
and
 INTEL_I845_G,
 Intel,
 i845 G/GL/GV/GE/PE,


I think that would bring a lot more clarity to non-expert users.


-Alex.


 -Original Message-
 From: Nicolas ASPERT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 13:26
 To: Dave Jones
 Cc: Margit Schubert-While; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?
 
 
 Dave Jones wrote:
 
  I'll check the chipset docs when I get time, and add a comment if
  necessary. No-one seems to be complaining that it isn't working,
  so I'm inclined to believe your diagnosis is correct.
  
 
 I found the thread of lkml containing the discussion about 
 that ... here 
 is the link to the original mail :
 
 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel=102122146829865=2
 
  DRI folks, this seems like duplication given that this data 
 is available
  in agpgart. How about changing this to read whatever 
 agpgart has set in
  .chipset_name ?
  
 
 Sounds like a good idea to me ;-)
 
 Best regards
 Nicolas.





Re: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?

2002-12-11 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:45:49PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
  In any case I don't think the string in the informational is very useful -- 
  it's a potentially inaccurate translation of state from *another* module, so 
  I'm just removing the lot.

Cool, that gets my vote too 8-)

Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility 
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel



Re: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?

2002-12-11 Thread Keith Whitwell
Dave Jones wrote:

On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:45:49PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
  In any case I don't think the string in the informational is very useful -- 
  it's a potentially inaccurate translation of state from *another* module, so 
  I'm just removing the lot.

Cool, that gets my vote too 8-)

Dave


Here's the changes I've committed to dri cvs.

Keith

? diff
Index: drmP.h
===
RCS file: 
/cvsroot/dri/xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/drmP.h,v
retrieving revision 1.54
diff -u -r1.54 drmP.h
--- drmP.h  3 Dec 2002 00:43:47 -   1.54
+++ drmP.h  11 Dec 2002 13:29:18 -
@@ -488,7 +488,6 @@
 
 typedef struct drm_agp_head {
agp_kern_info  agp_info;
-   const char *chipset;
drm_agp_mem_t  *memory;
unsigned long  mode;
intenabled;
Index: drm_agpsupport.h
===
RCS file: 
/cvsroot/dri/xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/drm_agpsupport.h,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.9 drm_agpsupport.h
--- drm_agpsupport.h22 Aug 2002 19:35:31 -  1.9
+++ drm_agpsupport.h11 Dec 2002 13:29:18 -
@@ -260,60 +260,6 @@
return NULL;
}
head-memory = NULL;
-   switch (head-agp_info.chipset) {
-   case INTEL_GENERIC: head-chipset = Intel; break;
-   case INTEL_LX:  head-chipset = Intel 440LX;   break;
-   case INTEL_BX:  head-chipset = Intel 440BX;   break;
-   case INTEL_GX:  head-chipset = Intel 440GX;   break;
-   case INTEL_I810:head-chipset = Intel i810;break;
-
-   case INTEL_I815:head-chipset = Intel i815;break;
-#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x02040f /* KERNEL_VERSION(2,4,15) */
-   case INTEL_I820:head-chipset = Intel i820;break;
-#endif
-   case INTEL_I840:head-chipset = Intel i840;break;
-#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x02040f /* KERNEL_VERSION(2,4,15) */
-   case INTEL_I845:head-chipset = Intel i845;break;
-#endif
-   case INTEL_I850:head-chipset = Intel i850;break;
-
-   case VIA_GENERIC:   head-chipset = VIA;   break;
-   case VIA_VP3:   head-chipset = VIA VP3;   break;
-   case VIA_MVP3:  head-chipset = VIA MVP3;  break;
-   case VIA_MVP4:  head-chipset = VIA MVP4;  break;
-   case VIA_APOLLO_KX133:  head-chipset = VIA Apollo KX133;
-   break;
-   case VIA_APOLLO_KT133:  head-chipset = VIA Apollo KT133;
-   break;
-
-   case VIA_APOLLO_PRO:head-chipset = VIA Apollo Pro;
-   break;
-   case SIS_GENERIC:   head-chipset = SiS;   break;
-   case AMD_GENERIC:   head-chipset = AMD;   break;
-   case AMD_IRONGATE:  head-chipset = AMD Irongate;  break;
-   case ALI_GENERIC:   head-chipset = ALi;   break;
-   case ALI_M1541: head-chipset = ALi M1541; break;
-
-#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x020402
-   case ALI_M1621: head-chipset = ALi M1621; break;
-   case ALI_M1631: head-chipset = ALi M1631; break;
-   case ALI_M1632: head-chipset = ALi M1632; break;
-   case ALI_M1641: head-chipset = ALi M1641; break;
-   case ALI_M1647: head-chipset = ALi M1647; break;
-   case ALI_M1651: head-chipset = ALi M1651; break;
-#endif
-
-#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x020406
-   case SVWRKS_HE: head-chipset = Serverworks HE;
-   break;
-   case SVWRKS_LE: head-chipset = Serverworks LE;
-   break;
-   case SVWRKS_GENERIC:head-chipset = Serverworks Generic;
-   break;
-#endif
-
-   default:head-chipset = Unknown;   break;
-   }
 #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = 0x020408
head-cant_use_aperture = 0;
head-page_mask = ~(0xfff);
@@ -321,13 +267,12 @@
head-cant_use_aperture = head-agp_info.cant_use_aperture;
head-page_mask = head-agp_info.page_mask;
 #endif
-
-   DRM_INFO(AGP %d.%d on %s @ 0x%08lx %ZuMB\n,
-head-agp_info.version.major,
-head-agp_info.version.minor,
-head-chipset,
-head-agp_info.aper_base,
-head-agp_info.aper_size);
+   
+   DRM_DEBUG(AGP %d.%d, aperture @ 

[Dri-devel] Re: Floating point exception

2002-12-11 Thread dax wood
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:34:16PM -0800, dax wood
wrote:
 hello out there,
 
   I have a problem with the current dri cvs
 (trunk) for a Rage 128. the odd thing is that I
got
 the damn thing to work (nicely), but with all
 programming i think i found a bug in the dri side
of
 Mesa 5.0.(if that makes any sence.)

[glean output trimmed]

 Floating point exception
 is the last i see for
a
 great many opengl programs 
 can any one help. or guide me to not be so stupid.

You aren't using an Athlon XP processor, are you?  A
few people have 
seen
this with the Radeon also.  Try running with the
environment variable
'MESA_NO_SSE' set, then try glean (or another app
that fails).  You 
might
also look at the thread with the subject Radeon:
lockup on state 
change.
*
the CPU i got is
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 6
model   : 8
model name  : Pentium III (Coppermine)
stepping: 3
cpu MHz : 701.601
cache size  : 256 KB

The ENV var 'MESA_NO_SSE' has no effect at all. I
Recompiled the cvs this time with 
#define MesaUseKatmai YES 
commented out and yet still recieve Floating point
exception a notable mention thought when dri is
disabled I am able to run all opengl programs
(slowly).
the odd thing is that I cant find the error
msg Floating point exception in any of the sources. Is
this in kernel?

--dax--

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility 
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel



[Dri-devel] Problems with vblank IRQ on G400

2002-12-11 Thread Ian Romanick
Has anybody run into problems with the vblank interrupt support on G400?  In
mgaWaitForVBlank the 'if ( !mmesa-mgaScreen-irq )' test fails (i.e., user
mode thinks there's an IRQ), but in the kernel mga_wait_vblank returns with
errno set to EINVAL.  THe only was I can see that this would happen is if
the 'if (!dev-irq)' test is true (i.e., kernel model thinks there is NOT an
IRQ).

Ideas?

-- 
Smile!  http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap990315.html


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility 
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel



Re: [Dri-devel] DRM Kernel Questions

2002-12-11 Thread D. Hageman

Alan,

What would you like to see be implemented to help get the job done.  In 
other words, what do you need from the DRI team?


On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

 On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 20:12, D. Hageman wrote:
  I have noticed some feedback from Alan and Linus already on this list.  Is 
  anyone taking care of things yet?
 
 No. There isnt currently a nice setup for this. 
 
 
 
 ---
 This sf.net email is sponsored by:
 With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility 
 Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
 http://hpc.devchannel.org/
 ___
 Dri-devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
 

-- 
//\\
||  D. Hageman[EMAIL PROTECTED]  ||
\\//


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility 
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel