Re: Kernel oops when loading i830 module
Dave Airlie wrote: > again please, found another error in the logic, this is like programming > by numbers!!! thanks be to God you found these issues before I submitted > this for the kernel :-) > > Still can't unload it. It seems the problem is that the kernel thought the driver is in use, and did not even call the clean-up code. The debug msg follows: [drm] Debug messages ON [drm:drm_probe] [drm:i830_stub_register] [drm:i830_stub_register] calling inter_module_register [drm:i830_stub_getminor] info count increased 1 [drm:i830_ctxbitmap_next] drm_ctxbitmap_next bit : 0 [drm:i830_ctxbitmap_init] drm_ctxbitmap_init : 0 [drm] Initialized i830 1.3.2 20021108 on minor 0: Intel Corp. 82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device [drm:drm_probe] [drm:i830_stub_register] [drm:i830_stub_register] already registered 1 [drm:i830_stub_getminor] info count increased 2 [drm:i830_ctxbitmap_next] drm_ctxbitmap_next bit : 0 [drm:i830_ctxbitmap_init] drm_ctxbitmap_init : 0 [drm] Initialized i830 1.3.2 20021108 on minor 1: Intel Corp. 82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device (#2) --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 918] New: color buffer alpha channel not available in any visuals
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=918 Summary: color buffer alpha channel not available in any visuals Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Platform: PC URL: http://debug.sat.qc.ca/mga/x/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Drivers/DRI/MGA AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Under XFree86 4.3.0 and Xorg 6.7.0, the mga driver is kind of buggy. It was fine in 4.2.1. Some GL applications don't show anything, others have performance issues. Compare the alpha column of the output of glxinfo under xfree86 4.2.1 (http://debug.sat.qc.ca/mga/x/4.2.1/glxinfo-4.2.1.txt) vs. 4.3.0 (http://debug.sat.qc.ca/mga/x/4.3.0/glxinfo-4.3.0.txt) and xorg 6.7.0 (http://debug.sat.qc.ca/mga/x/6.7.0/glxinfo-6.7.0.txt). This is under gentoo, but I have the same results in Debian (I haven't tried xorg in debian though). In http://debug.sat.qc.ca/mga/x/ you should find all information you need. The XF86Config file is the same for all setup. FYI, it's the same thing in 16bpp. Abit KT7ARAID/512MB RAM, Matrox G450 32MB AGP. -- Configure bugmail: https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: X.Org DRI merge and what about new dri tree.
> Someone needs to go into x.org cvs, cd .../drivers/savage, cvs up > -jDRI-XFree86-4_3_99_12-merge -jDRI and resolve conflicts, place the new > code under a BuildDevelDRIDrivers ifdef, and test. Until then you won't > be able to build a working savage setup from x.org. > > #define BuildDevelDRIDrivers YES is the host.def switch for building > development dri drivers. Seams this simple patch is enough to compile savage dri drive :) now I will test! thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. --- xc/config/cf/host.def 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ xc.new/config/cf/host.def 2004-07-23 20:32:19.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +#define BuildDevelDRIDrivers YES --- xc/config/cf/xorg.cf 2004-07-07 00:50:59.0 +0100 +++ xc.new/config/cf/xorg.cf 2004-07-23 21:48:58.0 +0100 @@ -402,9 +402,9 @@ */ # ifndef DevelDRIDrivers # if XFree86Devel -# define DevelDRIDrivers ffb +# define DevelDRIDrivers ffb savage # else -# define DevelDRIDrivers /**/ +# define DevelDRIDrivers savage # endif # endif
Re: X.Org DRI merge and what about new dri tree.
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 01:56, Sérgio M. Basto wrote: > On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 05:04, Eric Anholt wrote: > > I still need to merge the development drivers > > (mach64, savage), but my testbox is down due to a bad floppy and I do > > want to test these merges on the appropriate hardware. > > yes , I had this problem yesterday, DRI savage module doesn't compile. > What I have to change to compile savage dri modules ? > or How make xorg-cvs compile savage dri modules ? Someone needs to go into x.org cvs, cd .../drivers/savage, cvs up -jDRI-XFree86-4_3_99_12-merge -jDRI and resolve conflicts, place the new code under a BuildDevelDRIDrivers ifdef, and test. Until then you won't be able to build a working savage setup from x.org. #define BuildDevelDRIDrivers YES is the host.def switch for building development dri drivers. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: Debian packages of DRI drivers
On Thursday 22 July 2004 17:23, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: > Since the packages from Micahel Dänzer are outdated and don't > contain the S3TC patch we now have the strange situation that the > lates non-free ATI drivers are easier to use on Debian GNU/Linux > than the lates DRI drivers. > Would it be possible to cretae a system for unsing the DRI drivers > similar to the one used for the ATI drivers. For the ATI drivers > there exists an easy way to cretae Debian packages form them. > > I think it would be useful if there were a script that downloads the > drivers, > applies the S3TC patch if the user cooses to and creates Debian packages > optimized for the user's processor. > I have updated versions of Danzer's packages online here: http://www.nixnuts.net/files/ The last set of DRI packages I made are from July 7th. Since then I've been adding the S3TC patch and haven't put them online. If someone outside the US is willing to host them, I'll gladly share the newer versions with S3TC compiled in. John --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idG21&alloc_id040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: X.Org DRI merge
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:32:55 +0100 (IST), Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > also as far as I know the unichrome driver is in-secure it suffers I think > the same issues as the savage and mach64 with its DDX setting up in-secure > buffers... > > have a look at > http://dri.sourceforge.net/IRC-logs/20040628.txt > > if this is so I recommend the via stuff goes in under devel for now .. The 3d driver should definitly be, but as far as I recall, there is no DRI enabled DDX component in the DRI tree. perhaps we should sync up with the unichrome.sf.net tree? I thinks that's where most DDX, etc. devel happens. Alex > > Dave. > -- > David Airlie, Software Engineer > http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie > pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person > > --- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > -- > ___ > Dri-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel > --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: X.Org DRI merge
also as far as I know the unichrome driver is in-secure it suffers I think the same issues as the savage and mach64 with its DDX setting up in-secure buffers... have a look at http://dri.sourceforge.net/IRC-logs/20040628.txt if this is so I recommend the via stuff goes in under devel for now .. Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: X.Org DRI merge and what about new dri tree.
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 05:04, Eric Anholt wrote: I still need to merge the development drivers (mach64, savage), but my testbox is down due to a bad floppy and I do want to test these merges on the appropriate hardware. yes , I had this problem yesterday, DRI savage module doesn't compile. What I have to change to compile savage dri modules ? or How make xorg-cvs compile savage dri modules ? thanks, Sergio M. B.
[Bug 760] severe flickering with rendering on root window
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=760 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||REMIND --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-23 01:34 --- How can one change the visual id of the root window, then? This isn't a problem with my nvidia card. I have tried running X with all -cc options between 0x00 and 0x50, and it refuses to run in each case! -- Configure bugmail: https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: X.Org DRI merge and what about new dri tree.
Adam Jackson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 23 July 2004 00:04, Eric Anholt wrote: The point is that the DRI is merging into X.Org and there won't be a separate tree any more. I still need to merge the development drivers (mach64, savage), but my testbox is down due to a bad floppy and I do want to test these merges on the appropriate hardware. What should we do about the more dormant drivers? s3virge and the old 3dlabs branches spring to mind... The old tree shouldn't go away, but it won't be used by developers any more. Maybe something is needed to prevent non-clueful types trying to build it up & complain about out-of-date features, but I don't see any benefit in actual removal of the tree. Keith --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: Debian packages of DRI drivers
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: > I think it would be useful if there were a script that downloads the > drivers, applies the S3TC patch if the user cooses to and creates Debian > packages optimized for the user's processor. It took about few minutes for me to checkout dri and Mesa, apply the patches and tar up the sources. After that I just apt-get source'd the older packages, updated version numbers and tarballs and built. It's pretty trivial, only things that might need to be updated are the patches to host.cf and linux.cf in debian/patches. --j --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
