[Dx4win] bug for reports dxcc summary
Hello I use the dx4win version 8.01 And now the reports DXCC summary don't work well It's ok if the bands is all bands and the modes is all bands. But If you change bands for example to 14MHz the result not change ! It's the same if you change mode for example to CW Best 73 F5NBU - Yann http://www.f5nbu.org/ http://www.f5nbu.org/ __ Dx4win mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Dx4win] R: wish list for 8.02 or later
Ciao Mel. No, i did not asked to Simon. HRD is going to implement a fine Log with the 5.0 release and I think he should...or would be not so interested in interfacing to thirdy party logging software. We have to keep in mind that HRD is free while Dx4Win is not. The com emulator is something, I think, I have to ask to Paul. It is dx4win that can't compete with HRD for CAT. HRD respect the log is much more further. And I think we are talking about software. So I can imagine that with some hardware interface problems should be solved but, because something can be done on the software as well, here is my request. About HRD log...well I imported my 36000 qsos and was not so slow. What impressed to me is that all the time I ad one qso it takes so much time that, if I am a runner on some frequency, I certainly run faster than my log! After all I can confirm that dx4win is just the best software logging software. Because I use it since 1.07 release (December 1997) I would like to see as better as it can and I do not want to miss it due the CAT problems But year after year...new radio after new radio, can be clear that the problem is getting better. Today most of the home Ham radio stations are built if not on a computer base...around a computer and all new rigs have simpler connectivity. 73 de Tibor, IK2SAI -Messaggio originale- Da: Mel [mailto:ve...@videotron.ca] Inviato: venerdì 28 agosto 2009 15.02 A: Tibor M. Blum - IK2SAI - Cc: Dx4win@mailman.qth.net Oggetto: Re: [Dx4win] wish list for 8.02 or later Hi Tibor. AFIK #2 is being considered... it might take a while... bugs need to be fixed first. re #1... I think you should ask Simon to implement that in HRD since his program would create that requirement with any logging program. (Maybe he did... did you ask him?) I use multiple virtual ports as implemented my Microham and that works perfectly. As for DX4Win users switching to HRD logging... not a chance. D4W users use it for a reason... very fast performance and the most accurate award tracking. Did you try Simons' log? It uses Microsoft Jet DB so is SLOW! Here is an example... On my not so fast hamshack computer to import 25K QSOs... DX4Win (proprietary DB)... about 1 minute. Logic8 (Foxbase)... about 5 minutes. DXLabs (MS Jet)... about 30 minutes. HRD Log (MS Jet)... about 30 minutes DX4Win to open... about 3 seconds HRD Log to open... about 30 seconds... that's a looong time when you are waiting ;-) To be fair... I am sure HRD will get faster... Simon is an amazing programmer... but he can't make the MS Jet DB go any faster... I suspect Microsoft designed it that way to push people to it's SQL server ;) I believe he supports connections to other databases such as mySQL but that is starting to get complicated for the average user. Also, using MS Jet DB does make it much easier to access your data... for example... you have almost unlimited ability to make adjustments or corrections to your log if you are familiar with ACCESS. Nonetheless, you can't beat D4W for speed. Tibor M. Blum - IK2SAI - wrote: Ok, i don't know if it is appropriate at this time to make a post like this. Any way: I would like to ask a pair of things to Paul. 1) we can understand that CAT is a very complicated matter. Dx4win do that in a very primitive manner. But. now that dx4win has the band map should be very interesting to run connected to the radio. Problem is that many of us are using dedicated CAT software like HRD or, for the TS2000, the ARCP2000. Many of use have more than 2.3 radio connected. The only way to run dx4win together with such these software is a com emulator. I tried a number of them but they show some problem with dx4win. Now, because dx4win will be not a CAT program but it is simply the best logging software around should be a nice feature if, dx4win itself provides a virtual com system, good for itself and good for us running a multitasking system. Should be a nice touch now that the best cat program around (HRD) is going to implement a logging software by itself (HRD). Some people should be driven to migrate from dx4win to HRD log. 2) This is much more simple. I ham an avid cluster user. All the time that I connect to my node I do have a number of operations that should be easy to implement like a macro or something like that. I mean that when I start dx4win, my log should be connected directly to my node and should clean all the previous spots in its windows. At the contrary they are all manual opr. Holidays are at the end.. Contest season is back to the door and seems that propagation is going to do a better job than last year. 73 and good dx Tibor, IK2SAI __ Dx4win mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net This list
Re: [Dx4win] bug for reports dxcc summary
On 8/28/2009 3:34 AM, Yann wrote: I use the dx4win version 8.01 And now the reports DXCC summary don't work well It's ok if the bands is all bands and the modes is all bands. But If you change bands for example to 14MHz the result not change ! It's the same if you change mode for example to CW I think Paul has fixed this in the next version. It doesn't happen to everyone (I never saw this). - Jim -- Jim Reisert AD1C, jjreis...@alum.mit.edu, http://www.ad1c.us __ Dx4win mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Dx4win] wish list for 8.02 or later
On 8/28/2009 6:20 AM, Tibor M. Blum - IK2SAI - wrote: 1) we can understand that CAT is a very complicated matter. Dx4win do that in a very primitive manner. But. now that dx4win has the band map should be very interesting to run connected to the radio. Problem is that many of us are using dedicated CAT software like HRD or, for the TS2000, the ARCP2000. Many of use have more than 2.3 radio connected. The only way to run dx4win together with such these software is a com emulator. The microHAM devices already have multiple virtual COM Ports. I use DX4WIN and WriteLog together on two different virtual COM ports with one radio. I don't think this is something that Paul should be spending time on. It's a hardware issue, HRD should be supporting this, not DX4WIN. 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, jjreis...@alum.mit.edu, http://www.ad1c.us __ Dx4win mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Dx4win] ZK2V
Jim, I knew you would have the SOLUTION! That worked FB! I put a date in of 01-01-2009 and actually got 103 confirmations from qsos, I suppose that had been confirmed after subsequent downloads. I suppose this is an exercise that one should do from time to time as I have also myself been adding really old qsos from my paper log to DX4Win and uploading those from time to time. The stations I worked obviously would not get those if they did not go back a while occasionally when doing downloads. Thank you very much 73 Andy G3SVD -Original Message- From: Jim Reisert [mailto:jjreis...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jim Reisert AD1C Sent: 28 August 2009 15:57 To: Andy Hewitt Subject: Re: [Dx4win] ZK2V LoTW always starts downloading from the LAST day you downloaded, so it only has new confirmations. Try downloading lotwreport.adi again, but this time with a really old starting date, and see if the ZK2V QSOs are found in the lotwreport.adi file. THEN import LoTW into DX4WIN using duplicate QSO sets Upl Conf flag. - Jim On 8/28/2009 12:44 AM, Andy Hewitt wrote: Jim, Thanks. I am still using version 7.06 of DX4Win. I cannot be sure that it was included in a download as the most recent download replaced the previous one in the SAVE folder. If it was not included I cannot think why not as Chris uploaded his logs to LoTW within a day or so of finishing his stint on ZK2 and I saw then that I had the relevant crosses in the matrix. 73 Andy G3SVD -Original Message- From: jjreis...@gmail.com [mailto:jjreis...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jim Reisert AD1C Sent: 27 August 2009 22:15 To: Andy Hewitt Cc: dx4win@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Dx4win] ZK2V On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Andy Hewittandyphew...@btopenworld.com wrote: I worked Chris ZK2V on 20m on three modes. My qsos were uploaded to LoTW in June and were immediately shown ad QSL'd. They appear as such in the Award Credit Matrix with X for each mode and 20m. Since that date I have downloaded a lotw report a couple of times but this entity does not flip the UPL cfm flag to Y in DX4Win. Can anyone suggest why? Can I just do it manually? Are you 100% sure that ZK2V was in the ADIF file you downloaded from LoTW? What version of DX4WIN are you using? If version 8, in your DXCC award preferences, are both QSL and LoTW checked? - Jim -- Jim Reisert AD1C, jjreis...@alum.mit.edu, http://www.ad1c.us __ Dx4win mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Dx4win] ZK2V
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Andy Hewittandyphew...@btopenworld.com wrote: I knew you would have the SOLUTION! That worked FB! I put a date in of 01-01-2009 and actually got 103 confirmations from qsos, I suppose that had been confirmed after subsequent downloads. I suppose this is an exercise that one should do from time to time as I have also myself been adding really old qsos from my paper log to DX4Win and uploading those from time to time. The stations I worked obviously would not get those if they did not go back a while occasionally when doing downloads. I'm glad it worked for you Andy. One has to keep in mind that when you download from LoTW, you get only the new confirmations since the last time you downloaded (if you pick, the default starting date). This has nothing to do with the date of the QSO, but rather the date when the man behind the curtain matches up the QSO data on both sides. If I download on 12 August, the next time I download, LoTW will automatically START with QSOs that have been confirmed starting on 12 August, no earlier. So the downloads are incremental. You can always change the download start date to something earlier if you want to get a more complete report. I always name the lotwreport.adi file with the date I downloaded it (i.e. lotwreport_2009-08-12.adi). 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, jjreis...@alum.mit.edu, http://www.ad1c.us __ Dx4win mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Dx4win] R: R: wish list for 8.02 or later
Mel i hope to be understood. I think that dx4win is great. I wrote in my previous messages that for me there is only dx4win as a logging software. All the time I download a new logging software (believe me I have made it tenth of time) I am reassured by myself that no other software even come close to our dx4win. I well understand that Paul is not going to be rich with dx4win even if I suppose there should be some thousands of licences running around out there. Any way I am not interested in Paul's pocket affair: if he is still developing dx4win or he enjoy doing that or he can earn enough money for himself to be happy or both of them. We are just talking about possible way to develope our favourite sw and just talking about my - personal - wish list. It is the very first time that I ask something for dx4win but I think that I am not alone about that. Because dx4win is a logging software and not a CAT I understand that at this time it is gonna be some of very tedious to start a CAT develop. But because there are some CAT software (I mentioned HRD but it is not alone: as I said kenwood owners are proud of their proprietary CAT program: they are simply the best even respect to HRD) I think should be much better to give the chance to dx4win owner to run at the same time 2 software on the same com in order to CAT at 100% the radio and in order to enjoy the benefit coming from either software. I know that Simon is 1) a great Ham 2) is a great software developer BUT it is not the only one and all the time a CAT software take live we should go to the developer asking for that. No, sorry, this is something related to dx4win. Instead of spending time for a serious CAT interface, in MY opinion should be much more interesting to find the way to give the chance of choice the preferred CAT sw running at the same time with dx4win. 73 de Tibor, IK2SAI -Messaggio originale- Da: Mel [mailto:ve...@videotron.ca] Inviato: venerdì 28 agosto 2009 16.41 A: Tibor M. Blum - IK2SAI - Oggetto: Re: [Dx4win] R: wish list for 8.02 or later see comments below Tibor M. Blum - IK2SAI - wrote: Ciao Mel. No, i did not asked to Simon. HRD is going to implement a fine Log with the 5.0 release and I think he should...or would be not so interested in interfacing to thirdy party logging software. Why not? I really don't think Simon is motivated by business considerations... HRD is an altruistic undertaking... if he was out to make money there are better things he could do with his time. The same is true for Paul;) We have to keep in mind that HRD is free while Dx4Win is not. It makes some money... but Paul has to pay for his development tools and every hour he spends on DX4Win is an hour he could be spending doing contract work at typically $50-$100 per hour depending on where he lives. I'm pretty sure his motive isn't profit. There are some Ham software developers who have accumulated enough money through other business ventures that they can afford to develop software just for fun... Probably Paul isn't there yet ;) The com emulator is something, I think, I have to ask to Paul. It is dx4win that can't compete with HRD for CAT. HRD respect the log is much more further. And I think we are talking about software. So I can imagine that with some hardware interface problems should be solved but, because something can be done on the software as well, here is my request. About HRD log...well I imported my 36000 qsos and was not so slow. What impressed to me is that all the time I ad one qso it takes so much time that, if I am a runner on some frequency, I certainly run faster than my log! After all I can confirm that dx4win is just the best software logging software. I agree if speed and accuracy are the most important criteria. (they are for me). There are other programs with many more... and useful... features. BTW, go to the EQSL site and look at the pages on logging software and note the number of uploads based on software. DX4Win is ranked first with nearly 8 million QSOs uploaded. The only one close is Logger32 but that is free software (and you know about Hams and their legendary reluctance to open their wallet). Bear in mind that DX4Win, until recently, wasn't the easiest software to use with eQSL! Because I use it since 1.07 release (December 1997) I would like to see as better as it can and I do not want to miss it due the CAT problems Paul needs to do a bit of work on CAT... maybe he will do it. But if I were in his situation I wouldn't embark on any new features until all the old ones are working first. But year after year...new radio after new radio, can be clear that the problem is getting better. Today most of the home Ham radio stations are built if not on a computer base...around a computer and all new rigs have simpler connectivity. 73 de Tibor, IK2SAI -Messaggio originale- Da: Mel [mailto:ve...@videotron.ca] Inviato: venerdì 28 agosto 2009
[Dx4win] R: R: R: wish list for 8.02 or later
Mel, come on it is not necessary to ask - always - for some of common or usual. I do not talking about a common software. I talking about my logging software and about a function I am looking for. There are some software able to create virtual ports. I was advised to run VSPE that seems to be just perfect for what I looking for but while other software (for example HRD and ARCP2000) are working flawlessly dx4win gives numbers. So because it is not easy to find a third party software able to accommodate, say dx4win and HRD on the same com, on the same radio, at the same time, I am trying to ask *if is possible* to thing about that by Paul, developers of the software that I love. I am not interested about other software. If I was, may be I made a different choice well before. If you are able to find a software setup with third party emulator *running flawless* I will be happy in the same way. 73 de Tibor, IK2SAI -Messaggio originale- Da: Mel [mailto:ve...@videotron.ca] Inviato: venerdì 28 agosto 2009 20.57 A: Tibor M. Blum - IK2SAI - Oggetto: Re: [Dx4win] R: R: wish list for 8.02 or later Oh I understand Tibor. Probably he has to make a little money to justify the time he spends on it to the XYL ;-) I don't agree that supplying virtual com ports is a normal function of logging software. Can you gibe me one example of logging software that provides this function? I can give you many examples of logging software that doesn't. Writelog, N1MM, DXLabs, Logic, Win-EQF, Logger32, DXBase, Win-TEST, and at least a dozen others I have tried. I may take a look at some Virtual COM port software and see if I can get it to work with DX4Win. I will post to the reflector if I find one that works. Tibor M. Blum - IK2SAI - wrote: Mel i hope to be understood. I think that dx4win is great. I wrote in my previous messages that for me there is only dx4win as a logging software. All the time I download a new logging software (believe me I have made it tenth of time) I am reassured by myself that no other software even come close to our dx4win. I well understand that Paul is not going to be rich with dx4win even if I suppose there should be some thousands of licences running around out there. Any way I am not interested in Paul's pocket affair: if he is still developing dx4win or he enjoy doing that or he can earn enough money for himself to be happy or both of them. We are just talking about possible way to develope our favourite sw and just talking about my - personal - wish list. It is the very first time that I ask something for dx4win but I think that I am not alone about that. Because dx4win is a logging software and not a CAT I understand that at this time it is gonna be some of very tedious to start a CAT develop. But because there are some CAT software (I mentioned HRD but it is not alone: as I said kenwood owners are proud of their proprietary CAT program: they are simply the best even respect to HRD) I think should be much better to give the chance to dx4win owner to run at the same time 2 software on the same com in order to CAT at 100% the radio and in order to enjoy the benefit coming from either software. I know that Simon is 1) a great Ham 2) is a great software developer BUT it is not the only one and all the time a CAT software take live we should go to the developer asking for that. No, sorry, this is something related to dx4win. Instead of spending time for a serious CAT interface, in MY opinion should be much more interesting to find the way to give the chance of choice the preferred CAT sw running at the same time with dx4win. 73 de Tibor, IK2SAI -Messaggio originale- Da: Mel [mailto:ve...@videotron.ca] Inviato: venerdì 28 agosto 2009 16.41 A: Tibor M. Blum - IK2SAI - Oggetto: Re: [Dx4win] R: wish list for 8.02 or later see comments below Tibor M. Blum - IK2SAI - wrote: Ciao Mel. No, i did not asked to Simon. HRD is going to implement a fine Log with the 5.0 release and I think he should...or would be not so interested in interfacing to thirdy party logging software. Why not? I really don't think Simon is motivated by business considerations... HRD is an altruistic undertaking... if he was out to make money there are better things he could do with his time. The same is true for Paul;) We have to keep in mind that HRD is free while Dx4Win is not. It makes some money... but Paul has to pay for his development tools and every hour he spends on DX4Win is an hour he could be spending doing contract work at typically $50-$100 per hour depending on where he lives. I'm pretty sure his motive isn't profit. There are some Ham software developers who have accumulated enough money through other business ventures that they can afford to develop software just for fun... Probably Paul isn't there yet ;) The com emulator is something, I think, I have to ask to Paul. It is dx4win that can't compete
[Dx4win] R: R: R: R: wish list for 8.02 or later
Mel, happy to know that Paul is aware of the matter. What you write is exactly what I founded. Yes, dx4win runs ok on VSPE but if it is the only sw direct to that com. You say about CI-V bus...well, the problem is shown even with my kenwood ts2000x regardless to the speed: I tried from 4800 to 57600 and it is always the same. I mean... there is something to be fix not only for the Icom but for Kenwood as well. If it will work I will be satisfied. 73 de Tibor, IK2SAI -Messaggio originale- Da: Mel [mailto:ve...@videotron.ca] Inviato: venerdì 28 agosto 2009 21.44 A: Tibor M. Blum - IK2SAI - Oggetto: Re: [Dx4win] R: R: R: wish list for 8.02 or later OK Tibor... I tried out VSPE and it works perfectly... but DX4Win doesn't! It works as long as DX4Win is the only program polling, but if you generate traffic by trying to control the radio the DX4Win driver has issues... it is unable to handle traffic and collisions on the CI-V bus. This is a problem that Paul is aware of... and I hope he will address it eventually by improving the Icom interface. This is the correct solution to your problem. Adding virtual COM ports to DX4Win is not because, even if Paul did this, it still wouldn't work without fixing the Icom serial interface. Tibor M. Blum - IK2SAI - wrote: Mel, come on it is not necessary to ask - always - for some of common or usual. I do not talking about a common software. I talking about my logging software and about a function I am looking for. There are some software able to create virtual ports. I was advised to run VSPE that seems to be just perfect for what I looking for but while other software (for example HRD and ARCP2000) are working flawlessly dx4win gives numbers. So because it is not easy to find a third party software able to accommodate, say dx4win and HRD on the same com, on the same radio, at the same time, I am trying to ask *if is possible* to thing about that by Paul, developers of the software that I love. I am not interested about other software. If I was, may be I made a different choice well before. If you are able to find a software setup with third party emulator *running flawless* I will be happy in the same way. 73 de Tibor, IK2SAI -Messaggio originale- Da: Mel [mailto:ve...@videotron.ca] Inviato: venerdì 28 agosto 2009 20.57 A: Tibor M. Blum - IK2SAI - Oggetto: Re: [Dx4win] R: R: wish list for 8.02 or later Oh I understand Tibor. Probably he has to make a little money to justify the time he spends on it to the XYL ;-) I don't agree that supplying virtual com ports is a normal function of logging software. Can you gibe me one example of logging software that provides this function? I can give you many examples of logging software that doesn't. Writelog, N1MM, DXLabs, Logic, Win-EQF, Logger32, DXBase, Win-TEST, and at least a dozen others I have tried. I may take a look at some Virtual COM port software and see if I can get it to work with DX4Win. I will post to the reflector if I find one that works. Tibor M. Blum - IK2SAI - wrote: Mel i hope to be understood. I think that dx4win is great. I wrote in my previous messages that for me there is only dx4win as a logging software. All the time I download a new logging software (believe me I have made it tenth of time) I am reassured by myself that no other software even come close to our dx4win. I well understand that Paul is not going to be rich with dx4win even if I suppose there should be some thousands of licences running around out there. Any way I am not interested in Paul's pocket affair: if he is still developing dx4win or he enjoy doing that or he can earn enough money for himself to be happy or both of them. We are just talking about possible way to develope our favourite sw and just talking about my - personal - wish list. It is the very first time that I ask something for dx4win but I think that I am not alone about that. Because dx4win is a logging software and not a CAT I understand that at this time it is gonna be some of very tedious to start a CAT develop. But because there are some CAT software (I mentioned HRD but it is not alone: as I said kenwood owners are proud of their proprietary CAT program: they are simply the best even respect to HRD) I think should be much better to give the chance to dx4win owner to run at the same time 2 software on the same com in order to CAT at 100% the radio and in order to enjoy the benefit coming from either software. I know that Simon is 1) a great Ham 2) is a great software developer BUT it is not the only one and all the time a CAT software take live we should go to the developer asking for that. No, sorry, this is something related to dx4win. Instead of spending time for a serious CAT interface, in MY opinion should be much more interesting to find the way to give the chance of choice the preferred CAT sw running at the same time with dx4win. 73 de
[Dx4win] DX4WIN.CTY Release #66 - third call
I've updated the release notes again for DX4WIN.CTY #66: http://www.country-files.com/dx4win/release.shtml#66 I believe I've fixed all the problems reported to me since the release of DX4WIN 8.01. If I missed anyone, please send me the information again. Please let me know if there are any other changes needed. I will release this file the weekend of September 5/6 (Labor Day weekend in USA, unofficial end of summer). Thanks 73 - Jim AD1C 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, jjreis...@alum.mit.edu, http://www.ad1c.us __ Dx4win mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Dx4win] Problem with F2 logic.
If Set QSL date to today when confirming is checked in F2 preferences. When you press F2 to confirm a QSO it will pop up a dialog QSL was already sent. Mark again? even though the QSO was never QSLed. What is even more troubling is: if you reply No then the QSO indicates a QSL was sent even though it never was. It is as if the QSL date is set to the current date prior to checking if it was already sent. I discovered this by accident as I didn't intend to have this box checked. VE2DC, Mel. __ Dx4win mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Dx4win] Problem with F2 logic.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Mel ve...@videotron.ca wrote: If Set QSL date to today when confirming is checked in F2 preferences. When you press F2 to confirm a QSO it will pop up a dialog QSL was already sent. Mark again? even though the QSO was never QSLed. What is even more troubling is: if you reply No then the QSO indicates a QSL was sent even though it never was. It is as if the QSL date is set to the current date prior to checking if it was already sent. Same here. -- Jim Reisert AD1C, jjreis...@alum.mit.edu, http://www.ad1c.us __ Dx4win mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
