Re: [Elecraft] Why K3's are on most DXpeditions

2015-08-21 Thread John King
Another data point from the all-K3 FD station W1LY (2A RI).  The 3 Yagi
antennas in the photo (link below) were all on the 20m band simultaneously
for at least 4 hours at the beginning of FD. 1 station was on 20 CW, and 2
stations were on 20 SSB. All running 100 Watts. Another K3 was used in the
VHF station, and 2 other K3's were on standby as spares. Picture here:
http://w1sye.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/FD-2015-Panorama-Resized.jpg

  

73,

  John WA1ABI

  

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] OT: Solar Panel Tests with K1 and A123 Battery

2012-06-10 Thread John King
The connectors on the Powerfilm solar products are Delphi Weatherpack
connectors. They are inexpensive and  readily available.

One source:
http://www.hipoparts.com/weather-pack-2-pin-sealed-wiring-connector-kit/

The link above is for a complete male and female connector pair. The same
place sells the individual piece parts, and the pin extractor tool (handy to
have.)

I have no connection to the above company; Weatherpack connectors are
available from other sources as well.

73,
  john  WA1ABI

Eric WD6DBM said

 PowerFilm sells a daisy-chain cable for hooking two panels together.  It
is expensive, but it does use their water-resistant connectors.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Let's Try This Again -- was [K3] ... A 750 Hz, 8-Pole ... Filter?

2010-07-14 Thread John King
As another data point in this discussion...

I operate 100% CW with my K3, which is equipped with 200, 500, 1000, and
2.7KHz filters.

During FD 2010 I made 400+ CW QSO's during my two 4 hour operating shifts.
The great majority of that operating time was spent with the DSP bandwidth
at 600-700 Hz (and the 1KHz crystal filter.) Only once, when digging out a
weak one, did I narrow the bandwidth tight enough to engage the 200Hz
crystal filter. FD may not be the ultimate contest environment test, but
it's busy. Calling stations are often pretty far off zero beat in FD, so one
needs a fairly wide bandwidth to hear many of them. The 1KHz crystal filter
combined with the K3 DSP did a swimmingly good job this year and in FD's 09
and 08. Would a 750 Hz crystal filter be better? Perhaps, but I'm quite
happy with what I have now.

73,
  john WA1ABI


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Compression and noise - was W2IHY 8 band equalizer and EQ Plus

2010-04-26 Thread John King
 
 
 And do remember, more compression brings up background noise between
 words by the amount of the compression value.   Hence with 10 dB of
 compression, a background noise level that would normally produce and
 output of 1 watt will then sound like 10 watts of noise.
 
 73
 Bob, K4TAX
 

Bob's comment above is right on the money and is well worth re-reading.

Professional announcers use proper mic technique *and* they work in 
sound booths or acoustically inert studios. Sports announcers who must
work in noisy environments use headsets with high quality noise-canceling 
mics inches from their lips, followed by processors far more sophisticated
than any used by hams.

A tip to the phone contest fellows: prepare your CQ loops in a quiet
room well in advance of the event. I am always astounded at the poor
quality of the CQ loops in contests - many from the well known big
gun stations who should know better. I wonder about the impact on the
Q-rate when the listeners (especially those whose native language is 
other than English) have difficulty understanding the CQ loop.  

73,
  john WA1ABI
  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] FW: K3: machined concentric knobs from Mouser

2009-07-30 Thread John King

I went this route a couple months ago on my K3. The Alco knobs
do look spiffy, although they protrude slightly further out from
the front panel. After a while I went back to the factory knobs
on the inner shafts. Why? Because the stock knobs are far more
comfortable on the fingers. I'm a CW op, and I frequently adjust
both the AF and RF gain controls. I don't have the 2nd receiver
(yet) thus there is no need for me to adjust the outer knobs (yet)
so I left the spiffy but uncomfortable knobs on the outer shafts.

Moral of the story: It is mighty hard to improve upon the K3.

73,
  john WA1ABI



 -Original Message-
 From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
 [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net]on Behalf Of Brett Howard
 Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 9:29 PM
 To: James Sarte
 Cc: ac...@aol.com; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3: machined concentric knobs from Mouser


 The word is inexpensive... not cheap!  Those look really nice!  I was
 just sitting here wondering if there was a knob that would fit over the
 shift, width, speed, and pwr knobs.  I'm not so sure I'd want to mess w/
 them too much though as I'd not want the spacing between them to get too
 terribly much smaller.  They work well as they are... But that does look
 quite good...

 ~Brett

 On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 21:09 -0400, James Sarte wrote:
  Here are two pictures.  I left the bottom RF knob off to give
 you an idea of
  how well the larger concentric knob slides onto the encoder shaft.  It's
  perfect; no looseness or wiggling.
 
 
 
  http://jamespaulsarte.com/temp/ham/knob1.jpg
 
 
 
  http://jamespaulsarte.com/temp/ham/knob2.jpg
 
 
 
  James K2QI
 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3 Sidetone volume

2009-01-15 Thread John King
Carl said:

 .. sidetone volume. I require several volume settings depending on
 which speaker or headphones I'm using and by the time I realize 
 that I have
 it wrong I'm in the middle of a QSO and can't change it without 
 drowning out
 either myself or the other station.
 
 73  thanks for listening
 Carl WS7L
 K3 #486
 

Yes! I want very much to be able to adjust the sidetone
volume without actually creating sidetone. I hate to wake
the rest of the household trying to turn down the sidetone 
volume that I was trying to turn down to avoid waking the 
rest of the household.

73,
  john WA1ABI
  K3 #795
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3 vs. Rohde and Schwartz

2008-09-20 Thread John King
Interesting indeed. The comparison they quote is the IMD
dynamic range at 5 KHz spacing, which the RS wins. But
take a look at the 2 KHz spacing - the K3 trounces the RS.

73,
  john WA1ABI
  K3 #795


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Klewer
 Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2008 11:43 AM
 To: 'Elecraft'
 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 vs. Rohde and Schwartz
 
 
 Interesting to note that in QST magazine's review of a super whizbang, 
 thermonuclear commercial transceiver from Rohde and Schwartz in the 
 October issue of QST, the receiver they referenced its intermod 
 performance to is...the K3.
 
 NICE!
 
 John, N6AX
 K3 567
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] SB-221 for K3 need some help.

2008-08-31 Thread John King
My old SB-220 works just fine with my K3 on CW.

Yes, the SB-220's key line is 120 VDC. The kind that
will make you let go real quick if you accidentally
grab it. The K3 doesn't mind it. The K3's Key Out is
rated for +200V at 5 Amps.

The stock SB-220 won't do QSK, of course. Set the
K3 to semi-breakin with a hold delay long enough to 
keep the amp keyed between characters, and you're
good to go. FB

73,
  john WA1ABI



 
 
 
  I found out this week that K3 is good with Heathkit
  SB-220 amps, all you need to do is connect a shielded
  RCA cable between the units - how easy is that? !!!
 
 Are you sure?  Most of those amplifiers had high voltage PTT 
 circuits.  If I recall correctly the TR relay is a 120V 3PDT
 unit.  You may need a buffer or soft-key circuit in your 
 amplifier to make it safe with the K3. 
 
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread John King
I have to agree with Steve on this. I'm a CW operator.
I would like to have the sidetone track volume, while
still being able to adjust the mix ratio, preferably
while working CW.

After FD this year one fellow asked me an excellent
question: What don't you like about the K3?
I had been answering K3 questions all weekend, but I
wasn't prepared for that one. The single gripe I could
come up with was the sidetone volume adjustment.

As Steve says, it's not a deal breaker. We both own K3's.

73,
  john  WA1ABI


 I do have the K3 and know how to adjust the sidetone. I just
 prefer having
 the AF gain and sidetone track to one control. Also, I like to be able to
 adjust the sidetone level while sending CW which you can't do on the K3.
 When you push the mon button you get a constant sidetone. You cannot hear
 the other guy sending no can you send cw yourself while doing
 this. This is
 very weird and I have never seen a rig act like this. It's not a deal
 breaker

 Steve Ellington

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3 headphone level

2008-07-19 Thread John King

 
 Our FD group used a K3 and Heil ProSet this year, and we were really
 hoping to configure the K3 to have the speaker and headphones both
 active.  When we tried to use the SPKR+PH configuration, we found that
 the speaker and headphone levels were mismatched such that when the AF
 gain was adjusted to get adequate headphone level, the speaker was
 excessively loud, to the point where the loud speaker audio was annoying
 to the operator wearing the headphones.
 
- snip -
 ed N9EP
 

Here's what we did for our K3 CW station at FD:

The K3's Line Out was configured for =PHONES (this is a
fairly new firmware feature that sends both rcv audio and
sidetone to Line Out.) The Line Out fed a 20 Watt hi-fi
audio amplifier which drove a big honkin' loudspeaker
which sat outside the CW tent. The gain pot on the audio 
amp was used to control the PA volume - we played it loud 
during the day and were a little more conservative in the 
wee hours of the morning while some of the crew caught a 
little sleep. The effect was perfect - there are few things 
as satisfying as hearing your ace CW ops running pileups 
all over the FD grounds. 

73,
  john WA1ABI


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3 Burn In

2008-07-04 Thread John King
Disclaimer - the following test method is not approved or 
sanctioned by Elecraft. Conduct any testing at your own risk.

I work in Quality Assurance in my day job (30 years and counting.)

Long before FD I performed a 24 hour endurance test on my K3
to approximate worst-case FD conditions. I recorded a CQ FD message
similar to the actual message we would be using at FD into one of
the K3's message memories, then set the message repeat time to
minimum. The K3's output power was set to 120 Watts and the rig
was connected to a 50 ohm dummy load with a Bird thruline wattmeter
in line. The DC input voltage was set to 13.5 volts. The test was
performed at ambient room temp, about 24 degrees C. The K3 sent
the continuous message loop for a 24 hour period without incident.

The actual environmental conditions at our FD were a bit more 
severe than the test conditions above. The K3 was operated in a 
4-man dome tent exposed to full sun with an outside air temp 
approaching 90 degrees. We didn't measure the actual temperature 
inside the tent, but my informal assessment was hot as hell. 
Of course, the transmit duty cycle in actual FD use was less 
demanding than the test duty cycle. I had high confidence that 
the K3 would be up to the task, and it was.

I'm sorry to hear about your failure at FD. I have heard no other
reports of FD failures, and to my knowledge the VP6DX crew had
no failures during their operation earlier this year. It may be 
of small comfort to you, but I regard your failure as an anomaly
- stuff happens. Overall, the K3 is establishing a reputation as
a very reliable field rig.


73,
  john  WA1ABI

 




 
 Has anyone done a burn in on their radios to test?  They rate to 100W
 100% duty cycle for 10 minutes.  I'm sure there is quite a bit of
 headroom in that too.  Has anyone tested to that?  Do any of the
 Elecraft guys object to that type of testing?  
 
 I had a strange failure at FD this year and worry that unless I do a
 burn in like that once it gets back that my normal amount of operation
 will take quite a while to emulate what the rig saw during field day.  
 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] [K3] UTILITY Improvements - XML

2008-07-01 Thread John King

I would vote for XML as well. It's porky, but it's
human readable, it's universal and well supported
by many applications and frameworks, and one can
easily edit it by hand with Notepad or Emacs or
whatever.

73,
  john  WA1ABI
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3 BETA Firmware Release -- MCU Revision 2.10

2008-06-26 Thread John King
Me too. Wow.

I had reservations about loading a Beta before FD,
but I'm really glad I did. 

The NR is now *very* effective at reducing summer static
on CW.

Great job, Elecraft team.

73,
 john  WA1ABI

 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of AI1V
 Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:24 AM
 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 BETA Firmware Release -- MCU Revision 2.10
 
 
 
 I usually refrain from posting here to keep from adding to the 
 noise level,
 but can't resist right now.
 
 Re the new NR implementation - WOW!
 
 Great job.
 
 Rick
 AI1V
 
 
 wayne burdick wrote:
  
  K3 beta-test firmware revision 2.10 is now available. Full details 
  appear below and in the release notes.
  
  ...
  
  73,
  Wayne
  N6KR

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Auto-spot Was:RE: [Elecraft] K3 BETA FIRMWARE RELEASE -- MCU rev 1.94

2008-05-14 Thread John King
I agree with Bob, NW8L's comments below.

I've been on the air 99% CW for 41 years and I use
Auto-spot. I can easily match tones to better than
10 cycles by ear, but why bother? Auto-spot is working
better in 1.94 Beta and I have every confidence that
it will only get better.

73,
  john WA1ABI


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bob Cunnings
 Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 10:25 AM
 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 BETA FIRMWARE RELEASE -- MCU rev 1.94
 
 
 I've been on the air for 25 years working 99% cw, and zero beating by
 ear the whole time, thank you. Your condescending comments aren't
 helpful in this case.
 
 I appreciated the auto-spot feature since it saves time and was very
 robust. *I* find that *this* cw op enjoyed using this particular zero
 beating gizmo, advertised as a first tier feature of the K3.
 Unfortunately performance regressed in the latest firmware version -
 but it will be restored to its former glory only if the users offer
 their feedback to the developers.
 
 Bob NW8L
 
 On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:47 AM, K3KO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Guys,
 
  There is another way to solve the CW spot problem.
 
  It's called get on the air and work CW.  You will quickly 
 develop the skill
  of zero beating by ear.
  You will find that most CW ops don't use any zero beating gizmo.  Much
  faster and easier to do it by ear.
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 BETA FIRMWARE RELEASE -- MCU rev 1.94

2008-05-12 Thread John King
The Easter egg in v1.94 Beta is more sidetone volume!

Or did I miss this in the release notes? 

73,
  john WA1ABI

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] CW Secrets of the Masters

2008-03-13 Thread John King
400 Hz is my upper limit as well.
Lower than 300 Hz is certainly desirable to me.

I have forty plus years on CW, and no significant
hearing loss. I do the between-the-headphones DSP
far more effectively at 400 Hz and below.

73,
  john  WA1ABI


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Cutter
 Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 2:17 PM
 To: Bill W4ZV; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] CW Secrets of the Masters


 This makes perfect sense.  The ears have a logarithmic response to sound
 pressure and to frequency.

 David
 G3UNA

 
 
  Another one that Fred K3ZO (many time winner of Dayton CW pileup
  contests)
  recently mentioned is using extremely low pitch for weak signals.  Fred
  said many commercial ops he knew used somewhere in the 2-300
 Hz range so
  he thought his favored 400 Hz was rather high!
 
  73,  Bill  W4ZV
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] ESD Mats

2008-01-30 Thread John King
I picked up a good quality name brand mat on Ebay
for $35. It included the ground kit and a bottle
of cleaning solution.

The seller is Stanley Supply and Services.
They have more - see Ebay item 200195839901

No connection with the seller, just a happy buyer.

73,
  john  WA1ABI
  


  Where can one find a inexpensive ESD mat? Or what can be used 
 as an ESD mat? 
  Also, what about a ESD wrist attachment? Where do you find them? 
  
  Also, I guess you would hook them to the station ground? 
  
  Comments are welcome 
  
  Lee - K0WA 
  

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com