Re: [Elecraft] K2 calibration questions

2015-08-23 Thread Matt Maguire
The following app nite from Elecraft describes a great way to calibrate the 
dial on your K2:http://www.elecraft.com/Apps/K2%20C22%20Adjust%20App%20Note.pdf
After setting C22 and running CAL PLL, don't forget to also run CAL FIL and 
update the BFO setting for each filter (even if you just increase it by a small 
amount, then go back and change it back to the original value) -- you need to 
make a change in order to force the firmware to take account of the calibration 
adjustments in the previous steps.
There is a good article on K2 dial calibration on Don W3FPR's 
website:http://w3fpr.com/

73, Matt VK2RQ




On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 11:02 AM -0700, John Wiener ja...@fuse.net wrote:










Hi
Do people still ask about the venerable K2 on this group?  hi

my K2  serial # 5312 :

I built it 9 yrs ago now.


SO, I went back and (nervously) re-opened my K2 and re-did some of the 
calibration routines.  

The 4 Mhz calibration would not zero beat at 4. Mhz  but at 3999.8

The PLL ref Bosc range was OK

BFO test was OK

The CAL FCTR procedure would not allow zero beat on WWV 10 Mhz sig.  Readings 
were zero beat at 1.19.  Needed to get FCTR to 14911.82   could only get to 
14912.08  a diff of 1.74

Re-did PLL as required.  No probs there.

I am aware of the limitations of freq calib with the K2 when in the Hz range   
However I did not used to have this much of a problem.

I am probably missing something obvious.

That’s where you guys come in!

Thanks

John 
AB8O
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to matt.vk...@gmail.com
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

[Elecraft] K2 calibration questions

2015-08-23 Thread John Wiener
Hi
Do people still ask about the venerable K2 on this group?  hi

my K2  serial # 5312 :

I built it 9 yrs ago now.


SO, I went back and (nervously) re-opened my K2 and re-did some of the 
calibration routines.  

The 4 Mhz calibration would not zero beat at 4. Mhz  but at 3999.8

The PLL ref Bosc range was OK

BFO test was OK

The CAL FCTR procedure would not allow zero beat on WWV 10 Mhz sig.  Readings 
were zero beat at 1.19.  Needed to get FCTR to 14911.82   could only get to 
14912.08  a diff of 1.74

Re-did PLL as required.  No probs there.

I am aware of the limitations of freq calib with the K2 when in the Hz range   
However I did not used to have this much of a problem.

I am probably missing something obvious.

That’s where you guys come in!

Thanks

John 
AB8O
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K2 calibration questions

2015-08-23 Thread Don Wilhelm

John,

Certainly, this is a valid reflector for any Elecraft product.

Don't worry about exactly 4.000 MHz on that reference oscillator. It is 
only important that it be right on just before running CAL PLL 
followed by CAL FIL - and the frequency may not be exactly 4.000 MHz 
when set properly anyway.  That check in the manual was intended not as 
a calibration point, but only as a check to see if the oscillator was 
actually in close range of where it needs to be.
When not running CAL PLL and CAL FIL, the K2 does not depend on that 
oscillator at all, it uses the data stored in memory during those 
routines to know what frequency to display.


If you really want to fine tune the K2 dial calibration, go to the 
article on my website www.w3fpr.com and follow the procedure there. You 
will need to use Spectrogram or other audio spectrum analyzer to 
correctly tune in WWV and also to judge the width and placement of your 
IF filters.
If you need spectrogram, look for the links near the bottom of my Home 
webpage.  Those are links local to my website and those copies have been 
virus scanned many times and are known to be 'clean'.


Be aware that due to limitations in the BFO DAC, you may find up to a 
20Hz error in the final dial calibration results.  That was quite 
tolerable until recently when new data modes (such as JT65) were 
developed requiring greater frequency accuracy.  The K2 may not be 
suitable for those modes for that reason.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 8/23/2015 2:02 PM, John Wiener wrote:

Hi
Do people still ask about the venerable K2 on this group?  hi

my K2  serial # 5312 :

I built it 9 yrs ago now.

SO, I went back and (nervously) re-opened my K2 and re-did some of the 
calibration routines.

The 4 Mhz calibration would not zero beat at 4. Mhz  but at 3999.8

The PLL ref Bosc range was OK

BFO test was OK

The CAL FCTR procedure would not allow zero beat on WWV 10 Mhz sig.  Readings 
were zero beat at 1.19.  Needed to get FCTR to 14911.82   could only get to 
14912.08  a diff of 1.74

Re-did PLL as required.  No probs there.

I am aware of the limitations of freq calib with the K2 when in the Hz range   
However I did not used to have this much of a problem.

I am probably missing something obvious.

That’s where you guys come in!




__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] K2 calibration questions

2015-08-23 Thread Don Wilhelm

David,

I concede on that, and yes, warmup drift is normal.  I erred in using 
JT65 as the example, it just requires frequency stability (which the K2 
can do after warmup).  What I really intended are a few modern data 
modes that I understand must be 'netted' to a specific frequency, down 
to the single digit Hz.

The 20 Hz DAC steps in the K2 BFO may not allow that.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 8/23/2015 5:53 PM, aj4tf wrote:

Don,
I use my K2 on JT65 all the time, in fact I hardly ever even pick up the
microphone anymore.  I find that I need it to warm up for about 15 minutes
before the VFO stops slowly drifting.  However, even cold, the short term
drift on the K2 is slow enough to run JT65 without issues (at least mine
is!).




__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 calibration questions

2015-08-23 Thread aj4tf
Don,
I use my K2 on JT65 all the time, in fact I hardly ever even pick up the
microphone anymore.  I find that I need it to warm up for about 15 minutes
before the VFO stops slowly drifting.  However, even cold, the short term
drift on the K2 is slow enough to run JT65 without issues (at least mine
is!).

Thanks for all you contribute to this forum!

73,  David AJ4TF  High Point, NC   K2 # 7006




--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K2-calibration-questions-tp7606638p7606670.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com