Re: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements

2008-04-18 Thread w6jd
And when will "spark" be implemented??? After all this takes us back to the 
very origins
of Amateur Radio and it should not be allowed to die! No other radio on the 
market addresses this mode and Elecraft now has the opportunity to
correct this over-site!

Doug
W6JD...with a Ford spark coil in the junk box

-- Original message -- 
From: Don Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

> Lyle Johnson wrote: 
> "The firmware currently being tested does FM (w/CTCSS 
> encode, repeater splits, etc.) and has wider AM 
> receive bandwidth. It has better low frequency SSB 
> response, better ALC, and a number of other 
> enhancements." 
> 
> Of course Lyle has this NOW, in addition to a working 
> SubRx. 
> 
> If I could get my hands through this monitor and CHOKE 
> him, he'd be talking raspy right now... 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> AM-Sync is further down the list, but it *is* on the 
> list. 
> 
> 73, 
> 
> Lyle KK7P 
> 
> 
> ___ 
> Elecraft mailing list 
> Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list. 
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
> 
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm 
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements

2008-04-18 Thread Ed Muns
> I just hope that "bug fixes" come above everything else on the list.

I hope bug fixes are prioritized appropriately on the list and many lower
priority bug fixes not addressed until options like the KRX3 are released.

73,
Ed - W0YK

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements

2008-04-18 Thread Stewart Baker
I just hope that "bug fixes" come above everything else on the
list.

73
Stewart G3RXQ
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:21:47 -0700, Lyle Johnson wrote:
>> This hobby is not only for CW and SSB ops.  The K3 developers
can accept or
>> disregard any or all suggestions on this reflector.
>>
> I may not comment on many things here, but I try and monitor the
> reflector as best I can.
>
> The firmware currently being tested does FM (w/CTCSS encode,
repeater
> splits, etc.) and has wider AM receive bandwidth.  It has better
low
> frequency SSB response, better ALC, and a number of other
enhancements.
>
> AM-Sync is further down the list, but it *is* on the list.
>
> 73,
>
> Lyle KK7P
>
> ___
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements

2008-04-18 Thread Lyle Johnson

This hobby is not only for CW and SSB ops.  The K3 developers can accept or
disregard any or all suggestions on this reflector.   


I may not comment on many things here, but I try and monitor the 
reflector as best I can.


The firmware currently being tested does FM (w/CTCSS encode, repeater 
splits, etc.) and has wider AM receive bandwidth.  It has better low 
frequency SSB response, better ALC, and a number of other enhancements.


AM-Sync is further down the list, but it *is* on the list.

73,

Lyle KK7P

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements

2008-04-18 Thread Lyle Johnson

... Also, independent sideband selection would be nice as
well.


You can do this with the SubRx.  Set one Rx for USB, the other Rx for 
LSB, LINK the VFOs and you have it.


Yes, I know, the SubRx is not shipping yet.  But they *are* being 
manufactured and the one in my K3 *is* working.


73,

Lyle KK7P

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements

2008-04-18 Thread drewko1
I for one am looking forward to AM synch on the K3. (or will be, once
I've gotten my K3...). As strange as it might sound, I wouldn't have
ordered one if not for general coverage receive capability, so this
feature is pretty important to me. That and CW are my "prime focus". 

I don't have a problem with waiting while the more popular features
are developed. But the K3 is a software defined radio, with the
promise that it WILL do nearly everything; or at least everything a
Drake can do.

Anyhow, I just wanted to add my vote for synchronous AM detection and
wider b/w. Also, independent sideband selection would be nice as
well.Thanks.

73,
Drew
AF2Z



On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:57:34 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:

>
>Ken,
>
>I'm going to say what a lot of people are thinking but to polite to express.
>
>I like your suggestion.  After all the prime focus of the K3 design is
>amateur band, CW,SSB, and digital modes. Having high performance for these
>modes is its selling point.  Asking it to "do everything" on all frequencies
>detracts from efforts to optimize its primary functions.
>
>In almost 50 years,  I've heard maybe 1 amateur FM station operating.  
>Yeah, there may be a few more but it hardly constitutes a majority mode. 
>Are there really so many ham AM ops? 
>
>Sure people are free to buy anything they want.   Their choice.  However,
>what they do buy may not be optimum for their needs.   
>
>I think Elecraft is doing an amazing job at meeting the needs of their
>owners.  However, even they have limits.  
>
>73 de Brian/K3KO 
>
>

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements

2008-04-18 Thread Bob Serwy
 I do not favor censorship on this reflector.  These are only suggestions.
This hobby is not only for CW and SSB ops.  The K3 developers can accept or
disregard any or all suggestions on this reflector.   


Bob Serwy - N9RS

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Alsop
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 8:46 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements

And get the backlog down to almost "off the shelf" ...

It is clear that it isn't just the HF op who is blind.

73 de Brian/K3KO

jimbrass wrote:

> I'll have to go along with K3KO; I tried to opine the same thought 
> through Nabble and it was never posted.  Three of the most voracious 
> modes, spectrum wise, are FM, AM, and most anything digital, in that 
> order.  Spectrum is and has been a premium for amateurs.  It may be 
> more so in the future.  A relative few hams are users of the 
> aforementioned modes.  They appear to be the most frequent commenters 
> on this reflector.  Spectrum use is one issue. The other is making the
> K3 all things to all users.  I personally want to see a great CW and 
> SSB radio.  If, with time, it can do more with other modes, great.  I 
> wish the FM/AM/digital folks would remember that there are two guys, 
> one the code writer, who drive the K3 developement.  Give them a break 
> and lets ease up on the esoteric.
>
> My opinion.
>
> 73, Jim, K4ZMV
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "AD6XY - Mike" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 9:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements
>
>
>>
>>
>> The blindness of the HF only operator again?
>>
>> FM is absolutely a majority mode everywhere but HF, but to have only 
>> heard 1 FM signal in 50 years implies not attempt to progress beyond 
>> HF.
>>
>> FM is used all the time at VHF, though not for DX. That in Europe at 
>> least includes 6m and up. There is also limited activity at 10m. The 
>> K3 is an excellent transverter driver and that is the reason many of 
>> us bought one.
>> Having FM capabilities is necessary for DXing at VHF and above. I am 
>> sure everyone aware that microwave rain scatter contacts are 
>> frequently easier to complete using FM than SSB or CW because of the 
>> dispersive effects of the mode. Then there are  the FM satellites.
>>
>> AM is less used for transmission but very much used for SWL.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> K3KO wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Ken,
>>>
>>> In almost 50 years,  I've heard maybe 1 amateur FM station operating.
>>> Yeah, there may be a few more but it hardly constitutes a majority 
>>> mode.
>>> Are there really so many ham AM ops?
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://www.nabble.com/K3%3A-Desired-AM-mode-improvements-tp16624208p1
>> 6763414.html
>>
>> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> ___
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
>> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
>
> ___
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements

2008-04-18 Thread Ken Kopp

Hi Brian,

There are many users of 10M and 6M FM and 
many repeaters on these bands ... even several here 
in Montana. (:-)


AM also has many users, especially on 75M and 160M.

73! Ken Kopp - K0PP
  Montana Frequency Coordinator

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements

2008-04-18 Thread Brian Alsop

And get the backlog down to almost "off the shelf" ...

It is clear that it isn't just the HF op who is blind.

73 de Brian/K3KO

jimbrass wrote:

I'll have to go along with K3KO; I tried to opine the same thought 
through Nabble and it was never posted.  Three of the most voracious 
modes, spectrum wise, are FM, AM, and most anything digital, in that 
order.  Spectrum is and has been a premium for amateurs.  It may be 
more so in the future.  A relative few hams are users of the 
aforementioned modes.  They appear to be the most frequent commenters 
on this reflector.  Spectrum use is one issue. The other is making the 
K3 all things to all users.  I personally want to see a great CW and 
SSB radio.  If, with time, it can do more with other modes, great.  I 
wish the FM/AM/digital folks would remember that there are two guys, 
one the code writer, who drive the K3 developement.  Give them a break 
and lets ease up on the esoteric.


My opinion.

73, Jim, K4ZMV


- Original Message - From: "AD6XY - Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements





The blindness of the HF only operator again?

FM is absolutely a majority mode everywhere but HF, but to have only 
heard 1

FM signal in 50 years implies not attempt to progress beyond HF.

FM is used all the time at VHF, though not for DX. That in Europe at 
least

includes 6m and up. There is also limited activity at 10m. The K3 is an
excellent transverter driver and that is the reason many of us bought 
one.
Having FM capabilities is necessary for DXing at VHF and above. I am 
sure
everyone aware that microwave rain scatter contacts are frequently 
easier to
complete using FM than SSB or CW because of the dispersive effects of 
the

mode. Then there are  the FM satellites.

AM is less used for transmission but very much used for SWL.

Mike


K3KO wrote:



Ken,

In almost 50 years,  I've heard maybe 1 amateur FM station operating.
Yeah, there may be a few more but it hardly constitutes a majority 
mode.

Are there really so many ham AM ops?



--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3%3A-Desired-AM-mode-improvements-tp16624208p16763414.html 


Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements

2008-04-18 Thread jimbrass
I'll have to go along with K3KO; I tried to opine the same thought through 
Nabble and it was never posted.  Three of the most voracious modes, spectrum 
wise, are FM, AM, and most anything digital, in that order.  Spectrum is and 
has been a premium for amateurs.  It may be more so in the future.  A 
relative few hams are users of the aforementioned modes.  They appear to be 
the most frequent commenters on this reflector.  Spectrum use is one issue. 
The other is making the K3 all things to all users.  I personally want to 
see a great CW and SSB radio.  If, with time, it can do more with other 
modes, great.  I wish the FM/AM/digital folks would remember that there are 
two guys, one the code writer, who drive the K3 developement.  Give them a 
break and lets ease up on the esoteric.


My opinion.

73, Jim, K4ZMV


- Original Message - 
From: "AD6XY - Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements





The blindness of the HF only operator again?

FM is absolutely a majority mode everywhere but HF, but to have only heard 
1

FM signal in 50 years implies not attempt to progress beyond HF.

FM is used all the time at VHF, though not for DX. That in Europe at least
includes 6m and up. There is also limited activity at 10m. The K3 is an
excellent transverter driver and that is the reason many of us bought one.
Having FM capabilities is necessary for DXing at VHF and above. I am sure
everyone aware that microwave rain scatter contacts are frequently easier 
to

complete using FM than SSB or CW because of the dispersive effects of the
mode. Then there are  the FM satellites.

AM is less used for transmission but very much used for SWL.

Mike


K3KO wrote:


Ken,

In almost 50 years,  I've heard maybe 1 amateur FM station operating.
Yeah, there may be a few more but it hardly constitutes a majority mode.
Are there really so many ham AM ops?



--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3%3A-Desired-AM-mode-improvements-tp16624208p16763414.html

Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements

2008-04-18 Thread Darwin, Keith
I agree with the diversity of usage of rigs.  I'm guilty of being the
blind HF op who only uses CW and a bit of SSB, but I'm really interested
in experiencing synchronous AM.  I'd love to do some 10M FM just for
fun.  I'm sure there are others like me who, while focusing on one mode,
are interested in dabbling in something new.

So, is sync AM important?  Yea, it is.  It's part of the reason I bought
a K3.  So is 6 meters.

- Keith N1AS -
- K2 5411.ssb.100 -
- K3 maybe today - 

-Original Message-
From: Mike

The blindness of the HF only operator again? 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements

2008-04-18 Thread AD6XY - Mike


The blindness of the HF only operator again? 

FM is absolutely a majority mode everywhere but HF, but to have only heard 1
FM signal in 50 years implies not attempt to progress beyond HF. 

FM is used all the time at VHF, though not for DX. That in Europe at least
includes 6m and up. There is also limited activity at 10m. The K3 is an
excellent transverter driver and that is the reason many of us bought one. 
Having FM capabilities is necessary for DXing at VHF and above. I am sure
everyone aware that microwave rain scatter contacts are frequently easier to
complete using FM than SSB or CW because of the dispersive effects of the
mode. Then there are  the FM satellites. 

AM is less used for transmission but very much used for SWL.

Mike


K3KO wrote:
> 
> Ken,
> 
> In almost 50 years,  I've heard maybe 1 amateur FM station operating.  
> Yeah, there may be a few more but it hardly constitutes a majority mode. 
> Are there really so many ham AM ops? 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3%3A-Desired-AM-mode-improvements-tp16624208p16763414.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements

2008-04-18 Thread K3KO

Ken,

I'm going to say what a lot of people are thinking but to polite to express.

I like your suggestion.  After all the prime focus of the K3 design is
amateur band, CW,SSB, and digital modes. Having high performance for these
modes is its selling point.  Asking it to "do everything" on all frequencies
detracts from efforts to optimize its primary functions.

In almost 50 years,  I've heard maybe 1 amateur FM station operating.  
Yeah, there may be a few more but it hardly constitutes a majority mode. 
Are there really so many ham AM ops? 

Sure people are free to buy anything they want.   Their choice.  However,
what they do buy may not be optimum for their needs.   

I think Elecraft is doing an amazing job at meeting the needs of their
owners.  However, even they have limits.  

73 de Brian/K3KO 


Shane,

You could consider buying a used Drake R8 on eBay -- In my opinion it is a
fantastic general coverage receiver with sync dedtection and great sound. 
You might be able to pick one up for about the cost of a K3 subreceiver
option!  73 de Ken - N4OI / K1


Shane White wrote:
> 
> I'm looking for a new general purpose HF receiver and have been
> disheartened by radios, including transceivers, currently available on the
> market for less than around $2K. Consequently, I would like to know if
> Elecraft plan to incorporate Synchronous AM detection?
> ...snip
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3%3A-Desired-AM-mode-improvements-tp16624208p16763405.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements

2008-04-18 Thread Shane White

Thanks for the suggestion N4OI but the R8 was released 16 years ago. I'd like
to take advantage of some modern receiver design.


Shane,

You could consider buying a used Drake R8 on eBay -- In my opinion it is a
fantastic general coverage receiver with sync dedtection and great sound. 
You might be able to pick one up for about the cost of a K3 subreceiver
option!  73 de Ken - N4OI / K1


Shane White wrote:
> 
> I'm looking for a new general purpose HF receiver and have been
> disheartened by radios, including transceivers, currently available on the
> market for less than around $2K. Consequently, I would like to know if
> Elecraft plan to incorporate Synchronous AM detection?
> ...snip
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3%3A-Desired-AM-mode-improvements-tp16624208p16763386.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Desired AM mode improvements

2008-04-17 Thread N4OI

Shane,

You could consider buying a used Drake R8 on eBay -- In my opinion it is a
fantastic general coverage receiver with sync dedtection and great sound. 
You might be able to pick one up for about the cost of a K3 subreceiver
option!  73 de Ken - N4OI / K1


I'm looking for a new general purpose HF receiver and have been disheartened
by radios, including transceivers, currently available on the market for
less than around $2K. Consequently, I would like to know if Elecraft plan to
incorporate Synchronous AM detection?
...snip

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3%3A-Desired-AM-mode-improvements-tp16624208p16743529.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com