RE: [Elecraft] KRX3 questions

2008-08-30 Thread Bill W4ZV



Arie Kleingeld PA3A wrote:
 
 Lyle,
 
 I can understand why the beat effect can happen at certain frequencies.
 I read the message about the rounding errors.
 
 My question is: can you give an indication of how often this happens. Of
 course it depends on freq and filter offset but still, can you give an
 idication how bad it is.
 Anyone ?
 
 

The beat is not the same as the difference in filter offsets.  Somewhere in
the KRX3 documentation I believe it states the beat may only be as bad as a
Hz or so.  

73,  Bill

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/KRX3-questions-tp793412p793965.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] KRX3 questions

2008-08-30 Thread Bill W4ZV



Bill W4ZV wrote:
 
 
 
 Arie Kleingeld PA3A wrote:
 
 Lyle,
 
 I can understand why the beat effect can happen at certain frequencies.
 I read the message about the rounding errors.
 
 My question is: can you give an indication of how often this happens. Of
 course it depends on freq and filter offset but still, can you give an
 idication how bad it is.
 Anyone ?
 
 
 
 The beat is not the same as the difference in filter offsets.  Somewhere
 in the KRX3 documentation I believe it states the beat may only be as bad
 as a Hz or so.  
 
 73,  Bill
 
 

Found the reference on page 42 of the KRX3 manual (1.6 MB):

Diversity receive performance may be enhanced by
using crystal filters with matched offsets
(CONFIG:FLx FRQ). This ensures that the VFOs
are at exactly the same frequency. Non-matched
filter offsets will result in a difference of about +/- 1
Hz between the two synthesizers, which may be
heard as a “beat note” under some conditions.

http://www.elecraft.com/manual/KRX3_Subreceiver_Install__Operate_Rev_A_WEB.pdf

73,  Bill

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/KRX3-questions-tp793412p793982.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] KRX3 questions

2008-08-30 Thread Tom Childers, N5GE
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:57:15 -0700 (PDT), Bill W4ZV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

[snip]
 The beat is not the same as the difference in filter offsets.  Somewhere
 in the KRX3 documentation I believe it states the beat may only be as bad
 as a Hz or so.  
 
 73,  Bill
 
 

Found the reference on page 42 of the KRX3 manual (1.6 MB):

Diversity receive performance may be enhanced by
using crystal filters with matched offsets
(CONFIG:FLx FRQ). This ensures that the VFOs
are at exactly the same frequency. Non-matched
filter offsets will result in a difference of about +/- 1
Hz between the two synthesizers, which may be
heard as a “beat note” under some conditions.

http://www.elecraft.com/manual/KRX3_Subreceiver_Install__Operate_Rev_A_WEB.pdf

73,  Bill

This beat note experience is one of the reasons I got a K3.  My Orion II always
had a 6Hz difference between the A VFO and B VFO.  It was very irritating after
having Kenwoods and Yaesus that did not suffer from that problem.

I am still waiting for my KRX3, but when I heard about the offset possibility I
changed my order for the KRX3 from a 2.7 KHz filter to a 2.8Khz filter (the
others ordered are all 8 pole filters) and replaced the 2.7Khz filter in the K3
with a 2.8Khz filter.


Tom, N5GE - SWOT 3537 - Grid EM12jq

Those who would give up 
Essential Liberty to 
purchase a little Temporary 
Safety deserve neither 
Liberty nor Safety 

An excerpt from a letter 
written in 1755 from the 
Assembly to the Governor 
of Pennsylvania.

Support the entire Constitution, not 
just the parts you like.

http://www.n5ge.com
http://www.eQSL.cc/Member.cfm?N5GE

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] KRX3 questions

2008-08-30 Thread Bill W4ZV



Tom Childers, N5GE wrote:
 
 This beat note experience is one of the reasons I got a K3.  My Orion II
 always
 had a 6Hz difference between the A VFO and B VFO.  It was very irritating
 after
 having Kenwoods and Yaesus that did not suffer from that problem.
 
 I am still waiting for my KRX3, but when I heard about the offset
 possibility I
 changed my order for the KRX3 from a 2.7 KHz filter to a 2.8Khz filter
 (the
 others ordered are all 8 pole filters) and replaced the 2.7Khz filter in
 the K3
 with a 2.8Khz filter.
 

I  experienced the same problem with my Orion but it had a constant 2.3 Hz
offset.  

It's absolutely unnecessary to use only 8-pole filters in the K3 for
diversity.  In the case previously cited here by Doug N6TQS, his 2.7k
offsets were only off by 10 Hz so it would not cause any problem to set both
to the same offset (i.e. 10 Hz out of 2700 Hz is 0.4% and not significant).  

Don't be deceived in thinking 8-pole filters actually have zero Hz
offsets...they don't!  Several others (W0YK for one) have reported narrow CW
8-pole filters with offsets of 40-80 Hz.  In a 250 Hz (actually 370 Hz)
8-pole CW filter, this can be significant (i.e.  80 Hz out of 370 Hz is
~20%).  Also, if you go through the process to zero them, there is no
guarantee that any two 8-pole CW filters will actually have the same offset.

When I ordered my new K3 with KRX3, I did not order matched 2.7k and 500 Hz
filters, thinking that the 2.7ks would not be far enough off to be
significant and hoping the 500s would be about the same since they would
probably come from the same manufacturing batch.  The 2.7ks were off by 30
Hz so I split the difference and set both offsets to a number between, as
Lyle suggested.  The 500s just happened to be identical.  If they had been
off significantly (e.g. 50 Hz), I might have returned one and asked for a
matched filter at the additional $30 cost.   

My KRX3 works perfectly in diversity with no beat using only 5-pole filters.

73,  Bill

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/KRX3-questions-tp793412p794076.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] KRX3 questions

2008-08-30 Thread David Cutter
I'm hoping that for diversity I can just switch off my main rx filters and 
have both with only the stock 2.7kHz filter.  I only need the narrow roofing 
filters when I am near extremely strong local stations, which doesn't happen 
much.  I don't see a need to have 2 sets of roofing filters unless there is 
very strong local QRM,  perhaps 40m bc at night in some parts of Eu or 
on/near a contest station.


David
G3UNA



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] KRX3 questions

2008-08-30 Thread Bill W4ZV



David Cutter wrote:
 
 I'm hoping that for diversity I can just switch off my main rx filters and 
 have both with only the stock 2.7kHz filter.  I only need the narrow
 roofing 
 filters when I am near extremely strong local stations, which doesn't
 happen 
 much.  I don't see a need to have 2 sets of roofing filters unless there
 is 
 very strong local QRM,  perhaps 40m bc at night in some parts of Eu or 
 on/near a contest station.
 

Yes you could use the K3 Utility to do that when you wanted to use
diversity.  I have 2.7k/1.8k/500/200 in my Main but only 2.7k/500 in the
Sub.  When I want to use diversity, I just remember to use a WIDTH which
will auto-select either the 2.7k or 500.  This way I can still use the
1.8k/200 for severe QRM situations in non-diversity and the 2.7k/500 for
diversity and/or other situations.

73,  Bill

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/KRX3-questions-tp793412p794168.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] KRX3 questions

2008-08-30 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV

Bill, 

 I have 2.7k/1.8k/500/200 in my Main but 
 only 2.7k/500 in the Sub.  When I want to use diversity, I 
 just remember to use a WIDTH which will auto-select either 
 the 2.7k or 500.  This way I can still use the 1.8k/200 for 
 severe QRM situations in non-diversity and the 2.7k/500 for 
 diversity and/or other situations.

With some thought would it not be possible to get 500 and 200 Hz 
filters with matched offsets so one could use bandwidth diversity 
in addition to antenna diversity?  I will not be able to try that 
with my first K3 when that KRX3 arrives since the existing 500 
and 250 Hz filters have different offsets but I will look at the 
200 Hz filter in the second rig to see if it is close enough to 
the -790 Hz (measured in radio #1, specified for radio 2) to be 
useful. 

73, 

   ... Joe, W4TV 
  


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill W4ZV
 Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 11:47 AM
 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KRX3 questions
 
 
 
 
 
 David Cutter wrote:
  
  I'm hoping that for diversity I can just switch off my main 
 rx filters 
  and
  have both with only the stock 2.7kHz filter.  I only need the narrow
  roofing 
  filters when I am near extremely strong local stations, 
 which doesn't
  happen 
  much.  I don't see a need to have 2 sets of roofing filters 
 unless there
  is 
  very strong local QRM,  perhaps 40m bc at night in some 
 parts of Eu or 
  on/near a contest station.
  
 
 Yes you could use the K3 Utility to do that when you wanted 
 to use diversity.  I have 2.7k/1.8k/500/200 in my Main but 
 only 2.7k/500 in the Sub.  When I want to use diversity, I 
 just remember to use a WIDTH which will auto-select either 
 the 2.7k or 500.  This way I can still use the 1.8k/200 for 
 severe QRM situations in non-diversity and the 2.7k/500 for 
 diversity and/or other situations.
 
 73,  Bill
 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] KRX3 questions

2008-08-30 Thread Bill W4ZV



Joe Subich, W4TV-3 wrote:
 
 
 Bill, 
 
 I have 2.7k/1.8k/500/200 in my Main but 
 only 2.7k/500 in the Sub.  When I want to use diversity, I 
 just remember to use a WIDTH which will auto-select either 
 the 2.7k or 500.  This way I can still use the 1.8k/200 for 
 severe QRM situations in non-diversity and the 2.7k/500 for 
 diversity and/or other situations.
 
 With some thought would it not be possible to get 500 and 200 Hz 
 filters with matched offsets so one could use bandwidth diversity 
 in addition to antenna diversity?  I will not be able to try that 
 with my first K3 when that KRX3 arrives since the existing 500 
 and 250 Hz filters have different offsets but I will look at the 
 200 Hz filter in the second rig to see if it is close enough to 
 the -790 Hz (measured in radio #1, specified for radio 2) to be 
 useful. 
 

Sure you could probably do that if the offsets between the 500 and 200 are
not too far off.  You'll probably want to set the 500 equal to the 200
rather than vice versa if they aren't identical (i.e. a shift in a 500 Hz BW
is not as critical as the same shift in a 200).  I'm not at home now but I
recall my 500s are both -0.84 and my 200 is -0.91.  If I wanted to try what
you described I would set both 500s to -0.91 since a shift of 70 Hz is still
not unreasonable in ~500 Hz total BW.

The magicians at Elecraft are now at work on an improved DUAL PB which will
allow more flexibility in the context WIDTH setting, which would accomplish
somewhat similar results (but the context BW is attenuated by -24 dB versus
the focus BW).

73,  Bill

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/KRX3-questions-tp793412p794215.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] KRX3 questions

2008-08-30 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV

 The magicians at Elecraft are now at work on an improved DUAL 
 PB which will allow more flexibility in the context WIDTH 
 setting, which would accomplish somewhat similar results (but 
 the context BW is attenuated by -24 dB versus the focus BW).

I've tried the updated context filter in beta 2.34.  The problem 
for me is that the context area is attenuated more than I would 
like and the peak (50 Hz?) is a bit narrow.   I would like to 
try the transmit antenna on the subreceiver with a relatively 
wide filter (600 - 1000 Hz) to get an idea of the overall 
activity and a low noise (Beverage, K9AY, phased array, etc.) 
receive antenna on the main antenna with a narrow (e.g. 200Hz) 
filter to focus on the desired signal. 

73, 

   ... Joe, W4TV 
 


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill W4ZV
 Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 12:21 PM
 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: RE: [Elecraft] KRX3 questions
 
 
 
 
 
 Joe Subich, W4TV-3 wrote:
  
  
  Bill,
  
  I have 2.7k/1.8k/500/200 in my Main but
  only 2.7k/500 in the Sub.  When I want to use diversity, I 
  just remember to use a WIDTH which will auto-select either 
  the 2.7k or 500.  This way I can still use the 1.8k/200 for 
  severe QRM situations in non-diversity and the 2.7k/500 for 
  diversity and/or other situations.
  
  With some thought would it not be possible to get 500 and 200 Hz
  filters with matched offsets so one could use bandwidth diversity 
  in addition to antenna diversity?  I will not be able to try that 
  with my first K3 when that KRX3 arrives since the existing 500 
  and 250 Hz filters have different offsets but I will look at the 
  200 Hz filter in the second rig to see if it is close enough to 
  the -790 Hz (measured in radio #1, specified for radio 2) to be 
  useful. 
  
 
 Sure you could probably do that if the offsets between the 
 500 and 200 are
 not too far off.  You'll probably want to set the 500 equal to the 200
 rather than vice versa if they aren't identical (i.e. a shift 
 in a 500 Hz BW
 is not as critical as the same shift in a 200).  I'm not at 
 home now but I
 recall my 500s are both -0.84 and my 200 is -0.91.  If I 
 wanted to try what
 you described I would set both 500s to -0.91 since a shift of 
 70 Hz is still
 not unreasonable in ~500 Hz total BW.
 
 The magicians at Elecraft are now at work on an improved DUAL 
 PB which will
 allow more flexibility in the context WIDTH setting, which 
 would accomplish
 somewhat similar results (but the context BW is attenuated by 
 -24 dB versus
 the focus BW).
 
 73,  Bill
 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] KRX3 questions

2008-08-30 Thread Brett Howard
For me the context area isn't attenuated at all.  I believe its 200Hz
wide in the middle...  The only difference I thought was that it can now
go down to as narrow as 400 on the outer skirts rather than the 600 that
it used to be limited to.  Doesn't seem to make too much difference to
me but I do admit that I like not being limited as I did run it at 600
at times and wished I wasn't being stopped. 

I find that for me it may be a dumb idea to do something but I usually
don't like not being allowed to.  Thats one of the reasons why my 250Hz
filter is fully allowed to be used in SSB on my K3.  Not that I'd want
to do that but why limit myself.  

~Brett (KC7OTG)


On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 18:50 -0400, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
  The magicians at Elecraft are now at work on an improved DUAL 
  PB which will allow more flexibility in the context WIDTH 
  setting, which would accomplish somewhat similar results (but 
  the context BW is attenuated by -24 dB versus the focus BW).
 
 I've tried the updated context filter in beta 2.34.  The problem 
 for me is that the context area is attenuated more than I would 
 like and the peak (50 Hz?) is a bit narrow.   I would like to 
 try the transmit antenna on the subreceiver with a relatively 
 wide filter (600 - 1000 Hz) to get an idea of the overall 
 activity and a low noise (Beverage, K9AY, phased array, etc.) 
 receive antenna on the main antenna with a narrow (e.g. 200Hz) 
 filter to focus on the desired signal. 
 
 73, 
 
... Joe, W4TV 
  
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill W4ZV
  Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 12:21 PM
  To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
  Subject: RE: [Elecraft] KRX3 questions
  
  
  
  
  
  Joe Subich, W4TV-3 wrote:
   
   
   Bill,
   
   I have 2.7k/1.8k/500/200 in my Main but
   only 2.7k/500 in the Sub.  When I want to use diversity, I 
   just remember to use a WIDTH which will auto-select either 
   the 2.7k or 500.  This way I can still use the 1.8k/200 for 
   severe QRM situations in non-diversity and the 2.7k/500 for 
   diversity and/or other situations.
   
   With some thought would it not be possible to get 500 and 200 Hz
   filters with matched offsets so one could use bandwidth diversity 
   in addition to antenna diversity?  I will not be able to try that 
   with my first K3 when that KRX3 arrives since the existing 500 
   and 250 Hz filters have different offsets but I will look at the 
   200 Hz filter in the second rig to see if it is close enough to 
   the -790 Hz (measured in radio #1, specified for radio 2) to be 
   useful. 
   
  
  Sure you could probably do that if the offsets between the 
  500 and 200 are
  not too far off.  You'll probably want to set the 500 equal to the 200
  rather than vice versa if they aren't identical (i.e. a shift 
  in a 500 Hz BW
  is not as critical as the same shift in a 200).  I'm not at 
  home now but I
  recall my 500s are both -0.84 and my 200 is -0.91.  If I 
  wanted to try what
  you described I would set both 500s to -0.91 since a shift of 
  70 Hz is still
  not unreasonable in ~500 Hz total BW.
  
  The magicians at Elecraft are now at work on an improved DUAL 
  PB which will
  allow more flexibility in the context WIDTH setting, which 
  would accomplish
  somewhat similar results (but the context BW is attenuated by 
  -24 dB versus
  the focus BW).
  
  73,  Bill
  
 
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] KRX3 questions

2008-08-29 Thread Lyle Johnson

I've finally put the second RX in my K3 #22.

I have 2.7k filters with -0.86 and -0.87 offsets- have I ended up with
filters that are matched enough for diversity reception?


Yes, but set them both to the same value. A 10 Hz error is not going 
matter to the 2.7 kHz filter's passband response, but the 10 Hz 
difference in offset may result in an annoying beat effect when both 
receivers are tuned to the same indicated frequency.


73,

Lyle KK7P

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] KRX3 questions

2008-08-29 Thread Arie Kleingeld PA3A
Lyle,

I can understand why the beat effect can happen at certain frequencies.
I read the message about the rounding errors.

My question is: can you give an indication of how often this happens. Of
course it depends on freq and filter offset but still, can you give an
idication how bad it is.
Anyone ?

Thanks.

Arie PA3A



-

 I've finally put the second RX in my K3 #22.
 
 I have 2.7k filters with -0.86 and -0.87 offsets- have I ended up with

 filters that are matched enough for diversity reception?

Yes, but set them both to the same value. A 10 Hz error is not going 
matter to the 2.7 kHz filter's passband response, but the 10 Hz 
difference in offset may result in an annoying beat effect when both 
receivers are tuned to the same indicated frequency.

73,

Lyle KK7P

__

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com