RE: EMC-PSTC on a web site

2002-03-05 Thread Jim Bacher

Rich and I have been quietly working on the Mindcruiser site.  It has bugs
which we are still working out and has prevented us from making it a live
site. However, if you have ever posted an e-mail to the majordomo list it
has automatically created an account for you and put the message into the
archive.  We have a lot of account clean up to do.  Mindcruiser will send
you your password if you ask it to.  It is case sensitive, so when it asks
your account name and e-mail address you have to get it right.  If you need
help getting access to your account let me know and I will assist ( be
patient as this is an after hours volunteer work ).  You can browse it as a
guest for the moment.

The e-mail archives are on the site and are active, in that if you respond
to a forum in the Mindcruiser archive, it will go to everyone on the
majordomo emc-pstc list. If you send an e-mail to emc-pstc on majordomo, it
also goes in the archive on Mindcruiser (it is the second e-mail address on
the IEEE server, so it gets there fast). It is a bi-directional link between
the servers. Note: We are still looking for e-mail archives prior to 1996,
if you have them let Rich or I know you have them. 

We will be looking for a few people to start using Mindcruiser rather than
majordomo in the near future (April?). Some of the error messages you are
seeing at the moment are do to a bug in the software and will be fixed
shortly. I expect the next release of software to fix most of the issues we
have at the moment and make it possible to go live with the site.

If you are one who just monitors the messages, Mindcruiser will allow you to
get a daily or weekly summary rather than the constant inflow of e-mail..

Note: because of the archiving of the messages, it is important to always
use text and strip out the footer when you respond to a message through
majordomo.  That will help keep the database cleaner.  The IEEE is working
on populating the infopieces.

If you run into any bugs while on the site please report them to Mindcruiser
as well as Rich and myself.  Also let us know of any suggestions for the
site.

Jim

Jim Bacher,  Senior Engineer
Paxar Corp.
Formerly Monarch Marking Systems, Inc.
e-mail: jim.bac...@paxar.com  or  j.bac...@ieee.org
voice: 1-937-865-2020
fax: 1-937-865-2048 

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: Pencil erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating surface s, chassis, )

2002-03-05 Thread Scott Lacey

Robert,
The North American paper sizes are not irrational, just dated. The
engineering sizes (A through D) were originally mainly used with the contact
diazo (blueprint) duplicating method. The copies are all at 1:1 ratio with
the original drawing, which was hand drawn in the days before CAD.
Enlarging/reducing had to be done with a very large and expensive process
camera. This was usually only done to make offset printing plates for
manuals. The selection of sizes was actually very rational, as all the
larger sizes can be neatly folded to A size (8 1/2 X 11) with the title
block showing on top.

As for the U.S. Patent Office, I believe the switch to the metric paper was
done at the same time the patent period was changed (along with other
details) to harmonize with other nations under international patent
agreements.

Finally, the side issue of discussing paper sizes resulted after it was
mentioned that the downloaded galvanic compatibility chart could not be
printed on 8 1/2 X 11 paper. If the host based printer driver is loaded it
is possible to scale printed output to any size desired. The hardware based
print drivers generally do not have this ability.

Scott Lacey

-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Robert Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:47 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Pencil erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating
surface s, chassis, )



More importantly, North American paper sizes are just plain irrational.
At least the metric sizes all have the same aspect ratio, so
enlarging/reducing from one size to another doesn't result in a large
band of unused space. Even the US Patent Office has given up on US A
(8-12 x 11) or US legal (8-1/2 x 14) size, and for at least 10
years, submissions have to be made on the metric A4 size paper that most
of the civilized world uses.

Bob Wilson
TIR Systems Ltd.
Vancouver.

-Original Message-
From: John Shinn [mailto:john.sh...@sanmina-sci.com]
Sent: March 4, 2002 4:18 PM
To: 'John Woodgate'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Pencil erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating
surface s, chassis, )


Actually, US Legal size is 8-1/2 by 14 inches.  8-1/2 by 17 inches is
B-size.

John Shinn, P.E.

-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of John Woodgate
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:36 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Pencil erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating surface
s, chassis, )



I read in !emc-pstc that david_ster...@ademco.com wrote (in 2DF7C54A75B
dd311b61700508b64231002c5a...@nyhqex1.ademcohq.com) about 'Pencil
erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating surface  s, chassis, )',
on Mon, 4 Mar 2002:
It prints on legal (8-1/2 x
17) paper.

That size is 'illegal' in Europe! (;-)
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go
to
http://www.isce.org.uk
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe 

Re: Differences between EN55022:1987 and 1994

2002-03-05 Thread Peters, Michael

Gaeten,

I was searching for something completely different and came across this
article.  Hope this is what you are looking for.

http://www.ce-mag.com/archive/2000/novdec/roleson.html

Incidentally, the only difference I remember from '87 to '94, is the change
for radiated emissions measurement distance from 30 meters to 10 meters (the
limits increased to 40 and 47 dBuV/m), for Class A.

Regards,

Michael Peters

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: Laser Safety

2002-03-05 Thread John Juhasz

While it is technically possible to have a Class IIIb-capable component
laser in a Class I 'system' the path there is not clear cut.

Besides the emitter's technical issues (AEL, exposure time, radiant
power, wavelength, to name only a few) you have to take in 
consideration the failure modes of the laser driver circuitry - that
Class I limits can be exceeded in event of failure, whether the system
is a closed system (beam accessibility during service/normal use),
the products installation location and acessbility to unauthorized
personnel etc. 

Your best bet in classifying your 'system' is to
look at ANSI Z136.1 and .2 specs. In my opinion (some may disagree)
it's a good guide. 

John Juhasz
Fiber Options
Bohemia, NY


-Original Message-
From: Mark Schmidt [mailto:mschm...@xrite.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:17 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Laser Safety




I am trying to gain a better understanding of lasers and I have had some
discussion and been told some things that don’t make much sense to me so
I am asking the group for some guidance. Here is my question.

If the unexpanded raw beam of a Class III b laser was incorporated into
a larger system, is then expanded and used in this same system reducing
the beam intensity to Class I levels. Would the overall system be
classified as Class I ?

Thanks.

Mark Schmidt
Regulatory Compliance 
X-Rite Incorporated 
U.S.A.
(616) 257 2469
mschm...@xrite.com mailto:mschm...@xrite.com 




---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Laser Safety

2002-03-05 Thread Mark Schmidt


I am trying to gain a better understanding of lasers and I have had some
discussion and been told some things that don’t make much sense to me so
I am asking the group for some guidance. Here is my question.

If the unexpanded raw beam of a Class III b laser was incorporated into
a larger system, is then expanded and used in this same system reducing
the beam intensity to Class I levels. Would the overall system be
classified as Class I ?

Thanks.

Mark Schmidt
Regulatory Compliance 
X-Rite Incorporated 
U.S.A.
(616) 257 2469
mschm...@xrite.com mailto:mschm...@xrite.com 




---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: CE marking of equipment for military facilities

2002-03-05 Thread Allen, John


Hi Folks

Slight error in my previous message:

In the Treaty of Rome, the possibility of exemptions for military equipment
is now covered in Article 296 - not 226 as previously mentioned.

Sorry for any confusion caused.

John Allen

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: Pencil erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating surface s, chassis, )

2002-03-05 Thread Robert Wilson

More importantly, North American paper sizes are just plain irrational.
At least the metric sizes all have the same aspect ratio, so
enlarging/reducing from one size to another doesn't result in a large
band of unused space. Even the US Patent Office has given up on US A
(8-12 x 11) or US legal (8-1/2 x 14) size, and for at least 10
years, submissions have to be made on the metric A4 size paper that most
of the civilized world uses.

Bob Wilson
TIR Systems Ltd.
Vancouver.

-Original Message-
From: John Shinn [mailto:john.sh...@sanmina-sci.com] 
Sent: March 4, 2002 4:18 PM
To: 'John Woodgate'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Pencil erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating
surface s, chassis, )


Actually, US Legal size is 8-1/2 by 14 inches.  8-1/2 by 17 inches is
B-size.

John Shinn, P.E.

-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of John Woodgate
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:36 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Pencil erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating surface
s, chassis, )



I read in !emc-pstc that david_ster...@ademco.com wrote (in 2DF7C54A75B
dd311b61700508b64231002c5a...@nyhqex1.ademcohq.com) about 'Pencil
erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating surface  s, chassis, )',
on Mon, 4 Mar 2002:
It prints on legal (8-1/2 x
17) paper.

That size is 'illegal' in Europe! (;-)
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go
to
http://www.isce.org.uk
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


EMC-PSTC on a web site

2002-03-05 Thread Patrick Lawler

I finally read the bottom of a recent posting, and saw that the EMC-PSTC
discussion forum is now available through a web page.

Many thanks to those who put it together!

Patrick Lawler
plaw...@west.net

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: Pencil erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating surface s, chassis, )

2002-03-05 Thread John Shinn

You are right, I was not yet awake.  Sorry.

-Original Message-
From: Ron Pickard [mailto:rpick...@hypercom.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 7:21 AM
To: john.sh...@sanmina-sci.com
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Pencil erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating
surface s, chassis, )



Hi John,

Actually, B-size is 11 x 17 inches.

Best regards,

Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com




john.shinn@sanmina-sci.
comTo:
j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk, emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Sent by:   cc:
owner-emc-pstc@majordomSubject: RE: Pencil
erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating
o.ieee.org surface s, chassis, )


03/04/02 05:17 PM
Please respond to
john.shinn







Actually, US Legal size is 8-1/2 by 14 inches.  8-1/2 by 17 inches is
B-size.

John Shinn, P.E.

-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of John Woodgate
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:36 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Pencil erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating surface
s, chassis, )



I read in !emc-pstc that david_ster...@ademco.com wrote (in 2DF7C54A75B
dd311b61700508b64231002c5a...@nyhqex1.ademcohq.com) about 'Pencil
erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating surface  s, chassis, )',
on Mon, 4 Mar 2002:
It prints on legal (8-1/2 x
17) paper.

That size is 'illegal' in Europe! (;-)
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to
http://www.isce.org.uk
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list





---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: Pencil erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating surface s, chassis, )

2002-03-05 Thread Ron Pickard


Hi John,

Actually, B-size is 11 x 17 inches.

Best regards,

Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com





john.shinn@sanmina-sci. 

comTo: 
j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk, emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Sent by:   cc:  

owner-emc-pstc@majordomSubject: RE: Pencil 
erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating   
o.ieee.org surface s, chassis, )





03/04/02 05:17 PM   

Please respond to   

john.shinn  










Actually, US Legal size is 8-1/2 by 14 inches.  8-1/2 by 17 inches is
B-size.

John Shinn, P.E.

-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of John Woodgate
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:36 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Pencil erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating surface
s, chassis, )



I read in !emc-pstc that david_ster...@ademco.com wrote (in 2DF7C54A75B
dd311b61700508b64231002c5a...@nyhqex1.ademcohq.com) about 'Pencil
erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating surface  s, chassis, )',
on Mon, 4 Mar 2002:
It prints on legal (8-1/2 x
17) paper.

That size is 'illegal' in Europe! (;-)
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to
http://www.isce.org.uk
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list





---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Applied Part Type CF Mark; Medical Equipment

2002-03-05 Thread Peter Merguerian

Dear All,

Does anyone have an electronic file of the Type CF Mark?

This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If
you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, disseminate,
distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any way. If you
received this e-mail message in error, please return by forwarding the
message and its attachments to the sender.


PETER S. MERGUERIAN
Technical Director
I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
26 Hacharoshet St., POB 211
Or Yehuda 60251, Israel
Tel: + 972-(0)3-5339022  Fax: + 972-(0)3-5339019
Mobile: + 972-(0)54-838175
http://www.itl.co.il
http://www.i-spec.com





---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: RTTE

2002-03-05 Thread amund

Richard,
I think you have to examine each East-European country about their status
regarding RTTE. This morning I checked Hungary and they have adopted the
RTTE.

Notification form:
http://www.hif.hu/english/menu4/m4_6/mell-9.pdf

FAQ:
http://www.hif.hu/english/menu4/m4_6/faq_ang3.pdf


I do not know any status about Poland, Estonia, Slovakia, Czech Republic and
all the other East European countries, but since they are in membership
negotiation with EU, I would assume for sure that they have adopted RTTE or
at least accept a RTTE certificated product. But we have to check it out
.

Amund




-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]På vegne av
richwo...@tycoint.com
Sendt: 4. mars 2002 17:01
Til: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Emne: RTTE



Have any European states that are not EU or EFTA members adopted the RTTE
Directive and Notificaion process? In other words, will any other European
countries allow a radio product to be placed on their market if the
processes of the RTTE Directive are followed without the need for any other
special national process to be followed?

Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Permanent Delivery Failure

2002-03-05 Thread John Davies

The attached message had PERMANENT fatal delivery errors!

After one or more unsuccessful delivery attempts the attached message has
been removed from the mail queue on this server.  The number and frequency
of delivery attempts are determined by local configuration parameters.

YOUR MESSAGE WAS NOT DELIVERED!

Failed address: john.dav...@polycom.com

--- Session Transcript ---
 MX-record resolution of [polycom.com] in progress (DNS Server: 
63.102.226.211)...
 P=020 D=polycom.com TTL=(0) MX=[mail.polycom.com] {216.52.12.3}
 P=010 D=polycom.com TTL=(0) MX=[mail.polycom.com] {216.52.12.3}
 Attempting MX: P=010 D=polycom.com TTL=(0) MX=[mail.polycom.com] {216.52.12.3}
 Attempting SMTP connection to [216.52.12.3 : 25]
 Waiting for socket connection...
 Socket connection established
 Waiting for protocol initiation...
 220 corpit05.polycom.com ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail 
Service 5.5.2653.13) ready
 EHLO chatspace.com
 250-corpit05.polycom.com Hello [63.102.226.201]
 250-XEXCH50
 250-HELP
 250-ETRN
 250-DSN
 250-SIZE 0
 250-AUTH LOGIN
 250 AUTH=LOGIN
 MAIL 
From:gkzn1ikhaadykqcaafgpaqaawmjm5...@ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com 
SIZE=2806
 553 malformed address: 
gkzn1ikhaadykqcaafgpaqaawmjm5...@ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com 
SIZE=2806
 QUIT
--- End Transcript ---

: Message contains [1] file attachments


-
This multipart message contained a part at this location which was removed :
Content-Type: message/rfc822; charset=US-ASCII; name=md50002526803.md
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-ID: mdaemon16171617200203050105.aa0545...@chatspace.com
Content-Description: 


Replies to this message may be posted in a public forum.



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: RTTE

2002-03-05 Thread Allen, John
Rich

Possibly worth taking another look at my previous messages as attached.

Regards

John Allen
Thales
Bracknell



-Original Message-
From: richwo...@tycoint.com [mailto:richwo...@tycoint.com]
Sent: 04 March 2002 16:01
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RTTE



Have any European states that are not EU or EFTA members adopted the RTTE
Directive and Notificaion process? In other words, will any other European
countries allow a radio product to be placed on their market if the
processes of the RTTE Directive are followed without the need for any other
special national process to be followed?

Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---BeginMessage---
Hi folks

Further to Action 33..05, anyone interested in the progress of the
enlargement process should visit

http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/

This has links to individual pages charting the progress and (relatively -
typically November 2000) current status for each of the following countries:
Bulgaria.,  Cyprus  Czech Republic  Estonia
Hungary
Latvia  Lithuania   Malta   Poland
Romania
SlovakiaSloveniaTurkey  
The Links on the page will take you to further pages which have lists of
reports on each country.
Find the section headed 
Overview key political documents related to enlargement
Then find the most recent Prohress report such as Progress Report - 8
November 2000
These documents are quite long (~ 100 pages), but look for the Section C
CONCLUSION - which gives a general description of the progress to date and
the prognostications for the progress of joining the EU.
Then return to the country page on the website and look at the Press
Releases  section which has links to more up-to-date documents.
Regards
John 


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Hi Folks

I have just come across a very useful page on the NEMKO UK Ltd site, at:

http://www.nemko.ltd.uk/cert/direct.htm

The site is essentially advertising for NEMKO services but has tables which
give thumbnail sketches of the requirements for electrical and electronic
equipment approvals (including the namesof the organisations and
illustrations of their approval marks), including EMC but not RTTE, in the
following countries:

Central East Europe:
Poland, Czech Republic,  Slovak Republic,   
Hungary,Slovenia,   Croatia
Yugoslavia, Macedonia,  Albania
Romania,Bulgaria,   Turkey

Russia, CIS and Baltic States:
Russia  Ukraine Belarus
Lithuania   Estonia Latvia
Kazakhstan

South America:
Argentina   Mexico  Brazil
ColombiaChile

Middle East, Africa, Asia:
Saudi ArabiaIsrael  South Africa
India   Hong Kong   Australia
Japan   Korea   China (2 versions?)
Singapore   ThailandMalaysia

Regards

John Allen
Thales Defence Ltd.,
Bracknell, UK


-Original Message-
From: wo...@sensormatic.com [mailto:wo...@sensormatic.com]
Sent: 19 September 2001 20:43
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Request for a Compliance Matrix



I generated and posted this document in 1999 and some parts are now out of
date. I will update and re-post it with any corrections, updates and
additions that anyone cares to send to me.

Richard Woods

--
From:  Dave Lorusso [SMTP:dave.loru...@genband.com]
Sent:  Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:59 PM
To:  'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org'
Subject:  FW: Request for a Compliance Matrix

Thank you for the responses.  Dwight sent me a copy (attached).

Anyone one have a more up to date list?

Best regards,

Dave

-Original Message-
From:   Dwight Hunnicutt [mailto:dwight.hunnic...@vina-tech.com] 
Sent:   Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:36 PM
To: 'Dave Lorusso'
Subject:RE: Request for a Compliance Matrix

 worldwide compliance chart.pdf Dave-
Was this it?  Not too up to date, but this I what I have...
Dwight

-Original Message-
From:   Dave Lorusso [mailto:dave.loru...@genband.com]
Sent:   Wednesday, 

RE: CE marking of equipment for military facilities

2002-03-05 Thread Allen, John

Alexandru  Friends

Been there, done that (many times!):

LVD: 
- No exemptions in Directive, or none found in any national legislation.

EMC Directive: 
- No Exemption in Directive, but most EU countries (Not Holland and a couple
of others) have implemented exemptions in national legislation under Article
226 (was 221) of the Treaty of Rome). 

In UK this exemption is not automatic, but is stated to be at the iscretion
of tne Secretary of State for Defence. Nevertheless we do not have any
trouble with our UK MoD Customers when we just claim exemption on the basis
that we will meet the equivalent DEF 59-41 EMC standards. Other countries
may or may not accept the same approach

Machinery Directive: 
- Article 1 paragraph 3 includes the following exemption - machines
specially designed and constructed for military or police purposes. All
national legislation is assumed to include the same exemption.

(Note: RTTE Directive has a similar, but differently worded, exemption in
Article 1, paragraph 5)

However, watch out for: 
a) Equipment which is not exclusively for military use, which is then termed
to be dual use - in which case it must meet the requirements for
commercial sales, regards of whether it is sold to the commercial or
military markets. 

This means that your commercial equipment must meet the CE requirements.

b) Military customers who want the CE Marking regardless of the letter of
the law.

Regards

John Allen
Thales Communications Ltd
Bracknell 
UK

-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Guidea [mailto:gui...@cae.com]
Sent: 04 March 2002 21:13
To: 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org'
Subject: CE marking of equipment for military facilities
Imp


RE: RTTE

2002-03-05 Thread Alex McNeil

Hi Richard,

Have you tried this website on State of play of implementation of the
Directive

http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/rtte/implem.htm

Kind Regards
Alex McNeil
Principal Engineer
Tel: +44 (0)131 479 8375
Fax: +44 (0)131 479 8321
email: alex.mcn...@ingenicofortronic.com


-Original Message-
From: richwo...@tycoint.com [mailto:richwo...@tycoint.com]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 4:01 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RTTE



Have any European states that are not EU or EFTA members adopted the RTTE
Directive and Notificaion process? In other words, will any other European
countries allow a radio product to be placed on their market if the
processes of the RTTE Directive are followed without the need for any other
special national process to be followed?

Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Re: CE marking of equipment for military facilities

2002-03-05 Thread Cortland Richmond

During my final active duty tour, with the US Army in Germany, we deployed
Korean-War-vintage, manual telephone switchboards for less critical
telephone circuits. That was OK as long as we kept them on US bases and
connected them only to US lines, but as soon as we connected them to
Bundespost leased circuit, we had to pay a daily fine of (I believe) some
hundreds of Marks, because the equipment was not VDE-approved.


Cortland

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


R: CE marking of equipment for military facilities

2002-03-05 Thread Luigino Catello

An answer for you is in the document  Guide to the implementation of
directives based on the new approach an the global approach.
The document is available on the Internet and can be downloaded from the
Europa server at the following address:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/newapproach.htm

At page 15 you can read:
Products specially or exclusively intended for military or
police purposes are explicitly excluded from the scope of
certain New Approach directives. For the other directives,
Member States may, under certain conditions, exclude from
their field of application according to Article 296 of the EC
Treaty, products intended specifically for military purposes.

In your case (normal circumstances, not exclusively military) I think you
have to CE mark your equipment.

L. Catello


- Original Message -
From: Alexandru Guidea gui...@cae.com
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:12 PM
Subject: CE marking of equipment for military facilities



 Dear colleagues,

 Need your expert opinion regarding the obligation to CE mark commercial
 equipment (installation) intended to be used in foreign military bases on
 European soil, assuming compliance with equivalent MIL/DEF standards is
not
 required. Under normal circumstances, this equipment would be CE marked
to
 LVD, Machinery, and EMC Directives.

 Thanks,
 Alexandru Guidea

 CAE Inc.
 Montreal, Canada



 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

 Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc

 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
  Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
  Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

 All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
 Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: Differences between EN55022:1987 and 1994

2002-03-05 Thread Gaetan Hogue

Hi

Yes the product has been tested to EN55022:1987 and I want to know if I have
to retest for EN55022:1994. This product was obsolete but one of our
customers want some extra units. That why I need to know the differences.

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: am...@westin-emission.no
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Sent: 02-03-04 14:09
Subject: RE: Differences between EN55022:1987 and 1994


I have no idea about the differences. Why this question, is it because
you
have a unit which is tested according to EN55022:1987 and you wondering
if
it fulfils the 1994 version ?

For CE-marking of Information Technology Equipment you can use
EN55022:1994
or EN55022:1998 without any involvement of a notified body.

Best regards
Amund Westin, Oslo/Norway


-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]På vegne av Gaetan Hogue
Sendt: 1. mars 2002 22:13
Til: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Emne: Differences between EN55022:1987 and 1994



Hi Group
 
What was the major differences between EN55022:1987 and  EN55022:1994?
 
Do a web site exist to find the changes when the standard is modified?
 
Thanks
 

Gaétan Hogue
Approvals Manager
Eicon Networks
Phone: (514) 832-3488
Fax: (514) 745-5588
Email: gaet...@eicon.com
http://www.eicon.com

 

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: Pencil erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating surface s, chassis, )

2002-03-05 Thread John Shinn

Actually, US Legal size is 8-1/2 by 14 inches.  8-1/2 by 17 inches is
B-size.

John Shinn, P.E.

-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of John Woodgate
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:36 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Pencil erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating surface
s, chassis, )



I read in !emc-pstc that david_ster...@ademco.com wrote (in 2DF7C54A75B
dd311b61700508b64231002c5a...@nyhqex1.ademcohq.com) about 'Pencil
erasers for pre-EMI cleaning? (cleaning mating surface  s, chassis, )',
on Mon, 4 Mar 2002:
It prints on legal (8-1/2 x
17) paper.

That size is 'illegal' in Europe! (;-)
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to
http://www.isce.org.uk
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: ESD Generator confidence test (humor)

2002-03-05 Thread reheller



My first memorable experience with ESD was at the age of 10. I would build
quite a charge on my body when playing
basketball in the gym. And I would always get a hugh zap when I pushed on
the metal handle of the water fountain. I
knew just enough physics to know that a rubber basketball was an insulator
so the next time I went to get a drink I used
the basketball to push on the handle and then bent over to get a
drink.well you know the rest. I still carry a
tiny scar on my lower lip to this day.

Bob Heller
3M Product Safety, 76-1-01
St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
Tel:  651- 778-6336
Fax:  651-778-6252
==



   
Gary McInturff
   
Gary.McInturff@worldwidepa  To: Chris Maxwell 
chris.maxw...@nettest.com   
ckets.com Chris Chileshe 
chris.chile...@ultronics.co.uk   
   emc-pstc 
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
02/28/2002 11:31 AM  cc: 
brian_ku...@leco.com  
Please respond to Gary(bcc: Robert E. 
Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US)  
McInturff   Subject: RE: ESD 
Generator confidence test (humor)

   

   






 One other life lesson one I learned about ESD test areas. One should
always check that the drain wire is actually in place before on stands on
the ground plane and zaps the heck out of some equipment at 20 K or so. I
was trying to leave burn marks in the plastic housing to show me where the
arcs were actually penetrating the device. After a few smacks with the gun.
The whole ground plane was now elevated and when I leaned forward the table
height coincided with a very important, (at least to me) and well known
anatomical point so I got to be the ground path. I used much different
words, and volume levels that those of your technician and I don't
recommend the sensation to anyone.
 Gary

-Original Message-
From: Chris Maxwell [mailto:chris.maxw...@nettest.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 7:05 AM
To: Chris Chileshe; emc-pstc
Cc: brian_ku...@leco.com
Subject: RE: ESD Generator confidence test (humor)



This brings up a good real life story.

I used to work with a technician (John)  who helped with our in-house
compliance testing.   One day, we were discussing the Horizontal
Coupling Plane (HCP) which has a 1MegaOhm drain wire to the Ground
Reference Plane (GRP).

His theory was that he could stand on the GRP and touch the HCP during a
discharge; and he wouldn't feel anything because of the drain wire.

I argued that the 1MegaOhm resistance was much higher than his body
resistance to ground; so he would get a very noticable zap.

Our theoretical arguments went nowhere.  We decided to experiment.

I have alot of respect for John; because he beleived strongly enough
that he volunteered to be the guinea pig.  I set the ESD gun for 4KV and
hit the HCP.  John's hands jumped from the HCP and he said something
like oooh or ouch (I can't remember exactly).

So, let that be a lesson to you guys out there.  John already suffered
so that others may learn :-)

Chris Maxwell | Design Engineer - Optical Division
email chris.maxw...@nettest.com | dir +1 315 266 5128 | fax +1 315 797
8024

NetTest | 6 Rhoads Drive, Utica, NY 13502 | USA
web www.nettest.com | tel +1 315 797 4449 |




 -Original Message-
 From:   Chris Chileshe [SMTP:chris.chile...@ultronics.co.uk]
 Sent:   Thursday, February 28, 2002 7:41 AM
 To: 'emc-pstc'
 Cc: 'brian_ku...@leco.com'
 Subject: RE: ESD Generator confidence test (humor)



 Brian proposes a confidence test on ESD guns using colleagues..

  If the ESD gun is working properly, they will fall to the floor
 quivering
  slightly. Then they will wet their pants and forget who they are
 for
  about 25 to 30 minutes.

 A number of questions arise Brian..

 Is the order of events an essential part of the confidence test i.e.
 if they
 wet their pants *before* they fall to the floor, will the gun be
 deemed to
 have failed the test?

 Is there any useful information to be gained from the slight quiver,
 i.e.
 frequency, amplitude etc which might help with calibration of the
 discharge
 tip?

 Should 

RE: ESD Generator confidence test (humor)

2002-03-05 Thread Gert Gremmen : ce-test, qualified testing



Did you all know that an ESD charge may be well simulated by the
famous 3M Post-it notes.
My wife works in a company where life-size 3M Post-it notes are
used with the paper side down to get rid of dust onder shoes of
people entering a clean room. When changing sheets she get's loaded
to a level that our friends at Schaffner and Keytek turn pale.
Since the first time she unloaded onto a nearby engineer close
she was called Miss Million Volt.



Regards,

Gert Gremmen Ing.
ce-test, qualified testing
ce-marking  more
http://www.cetest.nl

Want to get started quick with ce marking ?
http://www.cetest.nl/ce-shop.htm
--
This email and any files transmitted with it may be of confidential
nature and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
to whom they are addressed. If you think you have received this email
in error please notify me immediately.
--


-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Gary McInturff
Sent: donderdag 28 februari 2002 18:31
To: Chris Maxwell; Chris Chileshe; emc-pstc
Cc: brian_ku...@leco.com
Subject: RE: ESD Generator confidence test (humor)



One other life lesson one I learned about ESD test areas. One should 
always
check that the drain wire is actually in place before on stands on the
ground plane and zaps the heck out of some equipment at 20 K or so. I was
trying to leave burn marks in the plastic housing to show me where the arcs
were actually penetrating the device. After a few smacks with the gun.  The
whole ground plane was now elevated and when I leaned forward the table
height coincided with a very important, (at least to me) and well known
anatomical point so I got to be the ground path. I used much different
words, and volume levels that those of your technician and I don't recommend
the sensation to anyone.
Gary

-Original Message-
From: Chris Maxwell [mailto:chris.maxw...@nettest.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 7:05 AM
To: Chris Chileshe; emc-pstc
Cc: brian_ku...@leco.com
Subject: RE: ESD Generator confidence test (humor)



This brings up a good real life story.

I used to work with a technician (John)  who helped with our in-house
compliance testing.   One day, we were discussing the Horizontal
Coupling Plane (HCP) which has a 1MegaOhm drain wire to the Ground
Reference Plane (GRP).

His theory was that he could stand on the GRP and touch the HCP during a
discharge; and he wouldn't feel anything because of the drain wire.

I argued that the 1MegaOhm resistance was much higher than his body
resistance to ground; so he would get a very noticable zap.

Our theoretical arguments went nowhere.  We decided to experiment.

I have alot of respect for John; because he beleived strongly enough
that he volunteered to be the guinea pig.  I set the ESD gun for 4KV and
hit the HCP.  John's hands jumped from the HCP and he said something
like oooh or ouch (I can't remember exactly).

So, let that be a lesson to you guys out there.  John already suffered
so that others may learn :-)

Chris Maxwell | Design Engineer - Optical Division
email chris.maxw...@nettest.com | dir +1 315 266 5128 | fax +1 315 797
8024

NetTest | 6 Rhoads Drive, Utica, NY 13502 | USA
web www.nettest.com | tel +1 315 797 4449 |




 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Chileshe [SMTP:chris.chile...@ultronics.co.uk]
 Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 7:41 AM
 To:   'emc-pstc'
 Cc:   'brian_ku...@leco.com'
 Subject:  RE: ESD Generator confidence test (humor)



 Brian proposes a confidence test on ESD guns using colleagues..

  If the ESD gun is working properly, they will fall to the floor
 quivering
  slightly. Then they will wet their pants and forget who they are
 for
  about 25 to 30 minutes.

 A number of questions arise Brian..

 Is the order of events an essential part of the confidence test i.e.
 if they
 wet their pants *before* they fall to the floor, will the gun be
 deemed to
 have failed the test?

 Is there any useful information to be gained from the slight quiver,
 i.e.
 frequency, amplitude etc which might help with calibration of the
 discharge
 tip?

 Should the stop-watch be calibrated or would any wrist watch do,
 including the lab assistant's own?

 Has any such confidence test resulted in immediate vacancies in the
 engineering department, specifically, for a lab assistant.

 Can we extend this principal to confidence tests on surge equipment
 using middle management and members of the sales departments?

 Rgds

 - Chris

 -Original Message-
 From: brian_ku...@leco.com [SMTP:brian_ku...@leco.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 3:17 PM
 To:   emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
 Subject:  Re:RE: ESD Generator confidence test


 We also have come up with a simple way to test our ESD gun, but it
 requires the
 help