RE: IEC 61010 requirements

2003-02-22 Thread Jon Griver

Peter,

Please let me have the name of the surgeon with the cellphone, so I'll be
careful to avoid him!!


Best Wishes,

Jon


On 21 Feb 2003 at 15:17, peter merguerian wrote:

 
 Jon,
 I must say that I somewhat disagree with you. A medical equipment as defined
in IEC60601-1 is one 
 that is for professional use. The surgeon's e-mails PC can also be used by
his son and I do not 
 consider it professional in the sense of the standard. 
 Let's not exagerate here! A person with too many medical devices should stay
in bed.
 The other day, I called a surgeon and he happened to be in the operating
room with his cellphone 
 performing an operation. Does that make his cellular comply with IEC 601-1?
 Peter
 
 Jon Griver jgri...@601help.com wrote: 
 
 Delphina,
 
 It's not only an issue of intended use, but also a question of location.
With regard to the example 
 you give, if a PC for the surgeon's urgent emails is located within the
'patient vicinity', as 
 defined in IEC 60601-1-1 (within about 6 feet of the patient's bed),
then I believe that it should 
 comply with IEC 60601-1, even though it's not a medical device.
 
 The reasoning behind this is that the patient could possibly touch the
PC (that's the logic behind 
 the 'patient vicinity' concept), and close a leakage current loop,
together with other medical 
 instruments with which he is in contact. This could be particularly
nasty if there is a fault in 
 the PC's earth wire.
 
 Regards,
 
 Jon Griver
 http://www.601help.com
 The Medical Device Developers Guide to IEC 60601-1
 
 
 On 20 Feb 2003 at 12:38, Han, Delphina wrote:
 
 ! gt; 
  Hi all,
  
  Thanks for your responses. When I originally asked the question, I was
sure
  that the particular equipment I was asking about does not fall under
the
  scope IEC60601, but I wanted to confirm if IEC61010 is the relevant
  standard. As you may notice, I have a copy of the IEC60601 standard
but not
  IEC61010! I also needed to find out if there were special requirements
for
  isolation transformers in IEC61010. 
  
  From the discussion, it seems that which standard to comply with is
  dependent on the intended use, and not where the equipment is placed.
So, if
  we put a PC in the hospital operating room, but it is just for the
surgeon
  to let's say, check email (not practical...but this is just an
example),
  would 60950 be the relevant standard? I doubt it'd have to meet 60601
  requirements.
  
  How about EMC standards? (maybe I should start a ne! w thread...).
Will this
  PC have to meet IEC 60601-1-2! for medical? Or EN 55022 for ITE? Bear
in mind
  this is in the hospital operating room. I am familiar with medical
equipment
  requirements but not so much with ITE, so forgive me if I'm making
mistakes
  here.
  
  My thoughts are all from the regulatory point of view. Of course if the
  customer wants compliance with a more stringent requirement, that is
what he
  gets...
  
  I appreciate all your thoughts/comments!
  
  -Delphina
  
  
  
  
  
   At 09:10 AM 2/19/2003 -0800, Han, Delphina wrote:
  
   Hi
   
   I am trying to find out safety requirements for devices that
control and
   monitor equipment in a hospital lab (used for pathology). Does it
fall
  under
   the IEC 61010 standard? If so, are there any requirements for use of
   isolation transformers in! that standard?
   
   Thanks in advance for your response!
   
   -Delphina
   
   ---
   This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
   Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
   
   Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
   
   To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
majord...@ieee.org
   with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
   
   For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com
Dave Heald: davehe...@attbi.com
   
   For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.or! g
   
   Archive is being moved, ! we will announce when it is back on-line.
   All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
  
  
  ---
  This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
  Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
  
  Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
  
  To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
  with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc
  
  For help, send mail to the list 

Re: IEC 61010 requirements

2003-02-22 Thread John Woodgate

I read in !emc-pstc that peter merguerian pmerguerian2...@yahoo.com
wrote (in 20030221231714.74613.qm...@web14806.mail.yahoo.com) about
'IEC 61010 requirements' on Fri, 21 Feb 2003:
The other day, I called a surgeon and he happened to be in the 
operating room with his cellphone performing an operation. Does 
that make his cellular comply with IEC 601-1?

Maybe not, but there are VERY serious EMC issues. No cell-phone should
be switched on in an OR.
-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk 
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to 
http://www.isce.org.uk
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!


This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc



Re: Temp chamber

2003-02-22 Thread John McBain
Hi Dave --
 
You could try ITC Engineering Services (925-862-2944) a few minutes north of
Fremont on Hwy. 680.  Mention my name.
 
-- John McBain

- Original Message - 
From: Dave  mailto:davewilson...@yahoo.com Wilson 
To: emc-p...@ieee.org 
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:10 AM
Subject: Temp chamber


Hello Group,

An ex-colleague of mine is looking to use a temperature chamber for a short
time to do some tests, in the Bay Area. Anyone know of a way of doing this
without too much expense?

Thanks in advance,

Dave Wilson




  _  

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo!  http://rd.yahoo.com/finance/mailtagline/*http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Tax
Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more




Re: Shieled ethernet cables in Germany

2003-02-22 Thread Doug Smith

Hi Nevin, George, and the group,

Although screened ethernet systems are favored in Europe, some of 
them perform considerably worst than unshielded systems in terms of 
emissions and immunity. Some poorly designed systems (use of pigtails 
on shields) radiate more, and even the best systems cannot match the 
immunity performance of unshielded systems in tests I helped perform 
in Switzerland a few years ago. The paper, published at Roma94 is 
posted on my site at:

http://emcesd.com/pdf/roma94.pdf

It is interesting to note that even good shielded systems can induce 
failures of PCs in IEC 61000-4-4 by providing a low impedance path for 
the common mode EMI to get into the works of the PCs, quite separate 
issue from the data transmission itself. Unshielded systems do not do 
this because of the CM chokes and balancing transformer design in the 
interface circuity.

Doug

neve...@attbi.com wrote:
 To my knowledge, only when the Class B for Central-Office equipment has to
be 
 met.
 
 Neven 
 
Hello Group,

I heard recently that shielded Ethernet cables have become something of
a customer-expectation-based defacto standard in Germany for
installation of network type ITE equipment (routers, switches,
firewalls, etc.)  Can anyone confirm or comment on that.  Is it like
that anywhere else?

Thanks

George Stults
WatchGuard Technologies Inc.


-- 

 ___  _   Doug Smith
  \  / )  P.O. Box 1457
   =  Los Gatos, CA 95031-1457
_ / \ / \ _   TEL/FAX: 408-356-4186/358-3799
  /  /\  \ ] /  /\  \ Mobile:  408-858-4528
|  q-( )  |  o  |Email:   d...@dsmith.org
  \ _ /]\ _ / Website: http://www.dsmith.org




This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc