Re: [PSES] Why use an MOV?

2012-12-17 Thread Doug Powell
John,

It appears 60936 may be withdrawn, try EN 132400.  In any case, I believe 
filters are generally safety certified without use of MOVs, not mandatory.  I 
have asked vendors to add these to a custom filter and to the requirements of 
other product standards such as EN 60950, EN 61010-1 or EN 50178; while 
specifying the category.  IEC 60384-14 does cover surge capability of component 
capacitors.  

I also do not see a connection to surge for EMI filters except by virtue of the 
capacitors used. To learn about this generally takes a little digging with your 
supplier.  I would think OV Cat II would be the minimum.

Hope this helps a little.


Doug



Douglas E Powell
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01


http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01

-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:37:24 
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Reply-To: John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PSES] Why use an MOV?

In message 
1745841055-1355694284-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-247462401
-@b15.c21.bise6.blackberry, dated Sun, 16 Dec 2012, doug...@gmail.com 
writes:

The susceptible components in a filter are the Y and X capacitors.

I am quite up to speed on that. My question applied to the filter as a 
whole. I didn't find any relevant test in any Part of IEC/EN 60939.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
The longer it takes to make a point, the more obtuse it proves to be.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] Why use an MOV?

2012-12-17 Thread John Woodgate
In message 
1064331955-1355731200-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-118760780
1-@b15.c21.bise6.blackberry, dated Mon, 17 Dec 2012, doug...@gmail.com 
writes:



It appears 60936 may be withdrawn, try EN 132400.


I think you have the wrong standard, it's 60939 (multi-part), not 60936 
(which is about shipborne radar), and anyway the withdrawn EN 132400 was 
about the capacitors, not the whole filter:



BS EN 132400:1995. Harmonized system of quality assessment for 
electronic components. Sectional specification. Fixed capacitors for 
electromagnetic interference suppression and connection to the supply 
mains (Assessment Level D)


Published Date: 15/01/1995 Status: Superseded, Withdrawn
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
The longer it takes to make a point, the more obtuse it proves to be.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] Why use an MOV?

2012-12-17 Thread Doug Powell
John,


Sorry, typo.  

So now I'm not certain I understand what you are asking.  Can you clarify?


Doug



Douglas E Powell
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01


http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougp01

-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:13:35 
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Reply-To: John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PSES] Why use an MOV?

In message 
1064331955-1355731200-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-118760780
1-@b15.c21.bise6.blackberry, dated Mon, 17 Dec 2012, doug...@gmail.com 
writes:

It appears 60936 may be withdrawn, try EN 132400.

I think you have the wrong standard, it's 60939 (multi-part), not 60936 
(which is about shipborne radar), and anyway the withdrawn EN 132400 was 
about the capacitors, not the whole filter:


BS EN 132400:1995. Harmonized system of quality assessment for 
electronic components. Sectional specification. Fixed capacitors for 
electromagnetic interference suppression and connection to the supply 
mains (Assessment Level D)

Published Date: 15/01/1995 Status: Superseded, Withdrawn
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
The longer it takes to make a point, the more obtuse it proves to be.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] Why use an MOV?

2012-12-17 Thread John Woodgate
In message 
1260632493-1355749824-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-300668403
-@b15.c21.bise6.blackberry, dated Mon, 17 Dec 2012, doug...@gmail.com 
writes:


So now I'm not certain I understand what you are asking.  Can you 
clarify?


Is there anything in the specifications of off-the-shelf EMI filters 
that says that they will withstand the 6 kV surge, which they have to do 
if there is no surge-protection upstream?


I see specs about 'hi-pot', usually 2.5 kV or so. But looking at the 
insulators on typical filters, I would  expect them to arc over at 6 kV.

--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
The longer it takes to make a point, the more obtuse it proves to be.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] Why use an MOV?

2012-12-17 Thread Brian Oconnell
Why use a MOV? This is a difficult subject for self and employer - both in 
terms of reliability and safety. Probably no other choice because most of my 
employer's stuff must operate in other than OV category 1 or 2.

For MTBF or MTTF, there are several Arrhenius-based models where the basis is 
avoiding thermal runaway, and there are terms for working voltage, typically 
labeled as 'MCOV' in the mfr's data sheet. The concept of thermal runaway is 
important because the ZnO MOV is a non-linear resistor with an exponential V-I 
curve.

The design trade-off is physical size vs energy. Small physical-sized MOVs will 
almost always fail short because temperature increases occur in very small 
areas through the disc. The other design trade-off is ambient temp vs working 
voltage. Internal dissipation will result in much greater dtemp/dv for a 
incrementally higher ambient temp.

Finally, the input fuse characteristics must be considered with respect to the 
rating of the MOV, and consider the unit's surge testing as part of safety TRFs.

Note following references that have helped me in previous years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varistor

Ioannou, Comparative Study of Metal Oxide Varistors for Failure Mode 
Identification, USF Masters Thesis, Nov 2004.

Birrell, Standler, 'Failures of Surge Arrestors on Low-Voltage Mains' IEEE 
Transactions on Power Delivery, 1993 Vol 8 No 1.

Other ideas?

Brian

-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Richard Nute
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 11:09 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Why use an MOV?

Presumably, the MOVs in question are connected
line to neutral.  

I would expect the designer would design his
primary circuit to withstand the normally-expected 
1500 V transient.

Why use an MOV???

Best wishes for the holiday season,
Rich

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] UL 1699B where art thou

2012-12-17 Thread Brian Oconnell
I complained (ok, will admit that I whined) too soon, or the squeaky wheel
gets oiled. The good people at UL said this in response to my formal query:

The Second Issue of the UL 1699B Outline of Investigation is currently
under development, and we anticipate its publication during the First
Quarter of 2013.

FYI, the Principal Engineer for the subject is Mr. Robert L. Larocca, and
Mr. Edward Minasian is the STP Project Manager.

Brian

-Original Message-
From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 2:57 PM
To: 'EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG'
Subject: UL 1699B where art thou

Anyone on the 1699 STP?

Am attempting to determine status of UL1699B. Silence since approx May 2011,
and next NEC will probably include both serial and parallel arc detect in
article 690.

And as typical, the assigned engineer from a well-known 'non-profit'
organization will not answer any questions.

thanks,
Brian

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


[PSES] Position Opening in OSHA's NRTL Program

2012-12-17 Thread Kevin Robinson
OSHA is currently seeking two experienced electrical engineers to work in
its Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) program.  The incumbent
would conduct in-depth onsite assessments of national and foreign
laboratories seeking recognition as NRTLs,  conduct in-depth audits of labs
granted recognition as NRTLs to verify continued compliance to these
requirements, work with other staff in developing policies, procedures, and
sound interpretations of OSHA’s electrical safety standards based on
national and international practices for the accreditation of laboratories
or the conduct of assessments and audits to ensure the integrity and
reliability of the NRTL Program in protecting workers and other duties as
described in the position announcement.

Candidates may apply at: *
https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/333708600*https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/333708600or
by searching
www.usajobs.gov for position DE-13-OSHA-41.

If you have any questions about the position or what it entails, feel free
to contact me at *robinson.ke...@dol.gov* robinson.ke...@dol.gov,
however, please DO NOT send resumes or other application information to
this address.

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


[PSES] Standard or practical guide to grounding electrical products which are not permanently installed

2012-12-17 Thread Brian Ceresney
Dear Regulatory Experts,
I'm searching for a standard or guideline which will provide detailed 
information about the internal grounding and bonding of products, and I've had 
limited luck in finding anything suiting my purpose. Reviewing a few CSA and UL 
standards hasn't been helpful.

Specifically, I am interested in Class I plug and cord connected products, 
which require the internal grounding wire to be secured to a metal, non-current 
carrying enclosure. I need to know what kinds of screw/nut/washer combinations 
are acceptable, mainly from a North American viewpoint, but not excluding 
Europe.(As usual, I'm working with small industrial-type battery chargers 
drawing less than 12A at 120V, 6A at 240V).

I'm particularly interested in requirements/acceptability of thread-cutting or 
-forming screws, with or without locking washers. I'm wondering about their 
securement performance over time.

The standards I've reviewed so far seem to be very non-specific about 
requirements, while specifying some testing. Are there any documents out there 
that are more detailed?

Thanks in Advance,
Brian C.

Brian Ceresney, CTech.
Regulatory Team Lead,
Delta-Q Technologies Corp.
3755 Willingdon Ave.,
Burnaby, BC  Canada  V5G 3H3
Tel: 604-566-8827
www.delta-q.comhttp://www.delta-q.com/
bceres...@delta-q.commailto:bceres...@delta-q.com


Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.





-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] Standard or practical guide to grounding electrical products which are not permanently installed

2012-12-17 Thread Brian Oconnell
Do not know why bonding materials/construction would not be in the scoped
safety standard. My typical refs for reliable bonding construction
requirements/suggestions are:
1. scoped safety standard for the equipment and/or end-use installation.
2. CSA design manual for the scoped standard(s).
3. Section General and/or Inspection Procedures of the affected UL file.
4. CSA No. 0.4
5. NEC article 250 (mostly wiring, but other hardware discussed)

There has to be 10E3 references for this stuff.

Brian

-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Brian
Ceresney
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 3:59 PM
To: 'EMC-PSTC'
Subject: Standard or practical guide to grounding electrical products which
are not permanently installed

Dear Regulatory Experts, 
I'm searching for a standard or guideline which will provide detailed
information about the internal grounding and bonding of products, and I've
had limited luck in finding anything suiting my purpose. Reviewing a few CSA
and UL standards hasn't been helpful.  
 
Specifically, I am interested in Class I plug and cord connected products,
which require the internal grounding wire to be secured to a metal,
non-current carrying enclosure. I need to know what kinds of
screw/nut/washer combinations are acceptable, mainly from a North American
viewpoint, but not excluding Europe.(As usual, I'm working with small
industrial-type battery chargers drawing less than 12A at 120V, 6A at 240V).

  
I'm particularly interested in requirements/acceptability of thread-cutting
or -forming screws, with or without locking washers. I'm wondering about
their securement performance over time.
 
The standards I've reviewed so far seem to be very non-specific about
requirements, while specifying some testing. Are there any documents out
there that are more detailed? 
 
Thanks in Advance,  
Brian C. 
 
Brian Ceresney, CTech.
Regulatory Team Lead,
Delta-Q Technologies Corp.
3755 Willingdon Ave.,
Burnaby, BC  Canada  V5G 3H3
Tel: 604-566-8827
www.delta-q.com
bceres...@delta-q.com

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] Standard or practical guide to grounding electrical products which are not permanently installed

2012-12-17 Thread Brian Ceresney
Thanks for your help, Brian. 
Unfortunately my two equipment standards are not very detailed, this product 
has no  UL file yet, and my(out of date)copy of CSA 0.4 doesn't add much. Time 
to buy more standards!

Could you explain the CSA design manual to me? I have never heard of a design 
manual before, and didn't see it on the CSA site. Is it available only for 
specific standards?  

Best Regards, 
Brian C.

Brian Ceresney, CTech.
Regulatory Team Lead,
Delta-Q Technologies Corp.
3755 Willingdon Ave.,
Burnaby, BC  Canada  V5G 3H3
Tel: 604-566-8827
www.delta-q.com
bceres...@delta-q.com


Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.







-Original Message-
From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 4:31 PM
To: Brian Ceresney; 'EMC-PSTC'
Subject: RE: Standard or practical guide to grounding electrical products which 
are not permanently installed

Do not know why bonding materials/construction would not be in the scoped 
safety standard. My typical refs for reliable bonding construction 
requirements/suggestions are:
1. scoped safety standard for the equipment and/or end-use installation.
2. CSA design manual for the scoped standard(s).
3. Section General and/or Inspection Procedures of the affected UL file.
4. CSA No. 0.4
5. NEC article 250 (mostly wiring, but other hardware discussed)

There has to be 10E3 references for this stuff.

Brian

-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Brian Ceresney
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 3:59 PM
To: 'EMC-PSTC'
Subject: Standard or practical guide to grounding electrical products which are 
not permanently installed

Dear Regulatory Experts, 
I'm searching for a standard or guideline which will provide detailed 
information about the internal grounding and bonding of products, and I've had 
limited luck in finding anything suiting my purpose. Reviewing a few CSA and UL 
standards hasn't been helpful.  
 
Specifically, I am interested in Class I plug and cord connected products, 
which require the internal grounding wire to be secured to a metal, non-current 
carrying enclosure. I need to know what kinds of screw/nut/washer combinations 
are acceptable, mainly from a North American viewpoint, but not excluding 
Europe.(As usual, I'm working with small industrial-type battery chargers 
drawing less than 12A at 120V, 6A at 240V). 
  
I'm particularly interested in requirements/acceptability of thread-cutting or 
-forming screws, with or without locking washers. I'm wondering about their 
securement performance over time.
 
The standards I've reviewed so far seem to be very non-specific about 
requirements, while specifying some testing. Are there any documents out there 
that are more detailed? 
 
Thanks in Advance,  
Brian C. 
 
Brian Ceresney, CTech.
Regulatory Team Lead,
Delta-Q Technologies Corp.
3755 Willingdon Ave.,
Burnaby, BC  Canada  V5G 3H3
Tel: 604-566-8827
www.delta-q.com
bceres...@delta-q.com

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com