RE: EMI trouble shoot inquiry

2001-10-16 Thread Scott Lacey

Ouch!
Having an interference source that is only a slightly longer wavelength than
the RFID frequency is a real tough problem. If the bombarders are only
interfering with transmits/receives and not actual writing false data to the
pallet markers I would suggest altering the system programming to read the
pallet while the bombarders are off, and then disable the RFID system during
the bombardment process. If the transponders actually are having garbage
written to them by the bombarders you need to contact OMRON for help.

Scott Lacey

-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of wmf...@aol.com
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 2:43 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Cc: jim.gi...@hedus.com
Subject: EMI trouble shoot inquiry



Group:
I attach an RF interference inquiry from a customer; I have no 'smarts'
where RF ID is concerned, so I turn to this august body...

==paste==We have an OMRON RFID data transfer system operating within the
same room as 12 RF generators (bombarders).  The transmission frequency for
the RFID system is 530 kHz and the transmission frequency for the bombarders
is 400 kHz.  The RFID system works through an antenna embedded in a pallet
and a stationary read/write head.  The bombarders are positioned on a
platform overhead.  The normal sequence is for a pallet containing a bulb to
move via conveyor to a read/write station where information is taken from
and added to the pallet.  The pallet is conveyed through several different
processes, being read/written on roughly 8 occasions.  One of the processes
contains an RF generator.  We are experiencing problems with the RFID system
when the RF generators are on.  The read/write system operates properly when
the RF generators are off.  We have determined that the RF generators are
creating an interference that does not allow the RFID to operate properly.
Initially, w!
e built copper shields in the area of some
of the RFID stationary heads.  This did not seem to help.  We also placed
EMI suppressors on the RFID cables(near the read heads).  This also was not
helpful.  I have spoken to a company that suggested the use of Ferrite tiles
to absorb the interfering waves.  The problem with these tiles is that they
are very brittle and difficult to use for shields.  The concept sounds good
but I don't have much flexibility in where I can place the shields.  I am
currently trying to use ferrite magnets attached to the copper guards.  Any
help/suggestions you could give me would be greatly appreciated.
===end paste==
Thanks for any suggestions; reply as you see fit.

WmFlanigan

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
messages are imported into the new server.


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.



Re: EMI trouble shoot inquiry

2001-10-15 Thread Noiseless
Hello Wm:

Troubleshooting an EMI problem by telephone or email is usually a very tall 
order.
The best that could probably happen is for someone to point you in the right
direction.

1) I agree with Ken, a clue lies in the generator frequency

2) Does the problem occur only at the station where the signal generator is 
used?
If so, this gives a big clue to the nature of the coupling

3) If by ferrite tiles you mean broadband absorbers, these are usually 
intended
for absorption of incident RF at frequencies above 30 MHz.  Their reflection 
coefficient is poor by design, so they wouldn't help nearly as much as a 
localized
conductive shield or high mu material (if these turned out to be appropriate 
solutions)

4) I bet the stationery read/write heads drive a high Z input amplifier/IC.
That is the most likely place for the system to be disturbed.  Chances
are you have either capacitive coupling into the amplifier, or inductive 
coupling
in to the head/amp interconnect.  Were your copper shields tied to the low 
side of the amplifier?

5) If the problem is occurring at the RFID read frequency (530 kHz), and some 
absorption is the key, then steel is not necessary, thick copper (~ 0.5mm) 
will give  40 dB attenuation at this frequency.  But it may easier to either 
reduce the read circuit loop area, and/or provide a local capacitve 
(copper/tin/any good conductor) shield at the receive amp/IC.

You need schematics and pictures to solve this problem effectively and 
quickly.


Lee Hill
Founding Partner
Silent Solutions LLC
EMC Consulting and Training
10 Northern Blvd., Suite 1
Northwood Executive Park
Amherst, NH 03031
(603) 578-1842 x203 (V) 
(603) 578-1843 (F)
lh...@silent-solutions.com
www.silent-solutions.com

In a message dated 10/15/2001 2:57:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
wmf...@aol.com writes:


 Subj: EMI trouble shoot inquiry
 Date: 10/15/2001 2:57:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time
 From:wmf...@aol.com
 Sender:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
 Reply-to:wmf...@aol.com
 To:emc-p...@ieee.org
 CC:jim.gi...@hedus.com
 
 
 
 
 
 Group:
 I attach an RF interference inquiry from a customer; I have no 'smarts' 
 where RF ID is concerned, so I turn to this august body...
 
 ==paste==We have an OMRON RFID data transfer system operating within the 
 same room as 12 RF generators (bombarders).  The transmission frequency for 
 the RFID system is 530 kHz and the transmission frequency for the 
 bombarders is 400 kHz.  The RFID system works through an antenna embedded 
 in a pallet and a stationary read/write head.  The bombarders are 
 positioned on a platform overhead.  The normal sequence is for a pallet 
 containing a bulb to move via conveyor to a read/write station where 
 information is taken from and added to the pallet.  The pallet is conveyed 
 through several different processes, being read/written on roughly 8 
 occasions.  One of the processes contains an RF generator.  We are 
 experiencing problems with the RFID system when the RF generators are on.  
 The read/write system operates properly when the RF generators are off.  We 
 have determined that the RF generators are creating an interference that 
 does not allow the RFID to operate properly.  Initially, w!
 e built copper shields in the area of some 
 of the RFID stationary heads.  This did not seem to help.  We also placed 
 EMI suppressors on the RFID cables(near the read heads).  This also was not 
 helpful.  I have spoken to a company that suggested the use of Ferrite 
 tiles to absorb the interfering waves.  The problem with these tiles is 
 that they are very brittle and difficult to use for shields.  The concept 
 sounds good but I don't have much flexibility in where I can place the 
 shields.  I am currently trying to use ferrite magnets attached to the 
 copper guards.  Any help/suggestions you could give me would be greatly 
 appreciated.  
 ===end paste==
 Thanks for any suggestions; reply as you see fit.
 
 WmFlanigan
 
 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
 
 Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
 
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc
 
 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
  Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net
 
 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
  Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
 
 All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
 messages are imported into the new server.
 
 
 --- Headers 
 Return-Path: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
 Received: from  rly-xe02.mx.aol.com (rly-xe02.mail.aol.com 
 [172.20.105.194]) 

Re: EMI trouble shoot inquiry

2001-10-15 Thread Ken Javor

You don't say what the rf generator frequency is.  If it is also MF (300 kHz
- 3 MHz) ferrite tiles won't work.  hard to give useful info without more
definition of the culprit emitter and its purpose. If the rf generator
drives a load through coax then it ought to be easy to shield it and contain
the radiation.  If the rf generator feeds an antenna then the problem is
more difficult.  If the rf generator operates at HF or above then filtering
of the victim might be possible.

But there simply isn't enough info here.

--
From: wmf...@aol.com
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Cc: jim.gi...@hedus.com
Subject: EMI trouble shoot inquiry
Date: Mon, Oct 15, 2001, 1:43 PM



 Group:
 I attach an RF interference inquiry from a customer; I have no 'smarts'
 where RF ID is concerned, so I turn to this august body...

 ==paste==We have an OMRON RFID data transfer system operating within the
 same room as 12 RF generators (bombarders).  The transmission frequency for
 the RFID system is 530 kHz and the transmission frequency for the
 bombarders is 400 kHz.  The RFID system works through an antenna embedded
 in a pallet and a stationary read/write head.  The bombarders are
 positioned on a platform overhead.  The normal sequence is for a pallet
 containing a bulb to move via conveyor to a read/write station where
 information is taken from and added to the pallet.  The pallet is conveyed
 through several different processes, being read/written on roughly 8
 occasions.  One of the processes contains an RF generator.  We are
 experiencing problems with the RFID system when the RF generators are on.
 The read/write system operates properly when the RF generators are off.  We
 have determined that the RF generators are creating an interference that
 does not allow the RFID to operate properly.  Initially, w!
 e built copper shields in the area of some
 of the RFID stationary heads.  This did not seem to help.  We also placed
 EMI suppressors on the RFID cables(near the read heads).  This also was not
 helpful.  I have spoken to a company that suggested the use of Ferrite
 tiles to absorb the interfering waves.  The problem with these tiles is
 that they are very brittle and difficult to use for shields.  The concept
 sounds good but I don't have much flexibility in where I can place the
 shields.  I am currently trying to use ferrite magnets attached to the
 copper guards.  Any help/suggestions you could give me would be greatly
 appreciated.
 ===end paste==
 Thanks for any suggestions; reply as you see fit.

 WmFlanigan

 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

 Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc

 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
  Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
  Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

 All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
 messages are imported into the new server.
 

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.



RE: EMI trouble shoot inquiry

2001-10-15 Thread UMBDENSTOCK

Without knowing anything about your system, RFID and RF bombarders, I will
merely offer a SWAG.  My guess is that the RFID system is a magnetic loop
system?  If so, copper will not have significant effect on shielding the
system.  Ferrous material will.  Try a galvanized sheet steel for a shield.
This is a commonly available material and will afford much better shielding
effectiveness at that frequency than copper will.  You will be using the
sheet steel to guide the flux from the bombarder around instead of through
the RFID system.  If the shield is too close to the RFID system, you will
warp the field of the intended RFID signal also.

It might also be that you are on the threshold of receiver blocking for the
proximity of the 400 kHz bombarder frequency compared to the desired 530 kHz
RFID frequency .  How sharp can you make a notch filter that is sufficiently
stable for your environment?

Good luck,

Don Umbdenstock
Sensormatic


 --
 From: wmf...@aol.com[SMTP:wmf...@aol.com]
 Reply To: wmf...@aol.com
 Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 2:43 PM
 To:   emc-p...@ieee.org
 Cc:   jim.gi...@hedus.com
 Subject:  EMI trouble shoot inquiry
 
 
 Group:
 I attach an RF interference inquiry from a customer; I have no 'smarts'
 where RF ID is concerned, so I turn to this august body...
 
 ==paste==We have an OMRON RFID data transfer system operating within the
 same room as 12 RF generators (bombarders).  The transmission frequency
 for the RFID system is 530 kHz and the transmission frequency for the
 bombarders is 400 kHz.  The RFID system works through an antenna embedded
 in a pallet and a stationary read/write head.  The bombarders are
 positioned on a platform overhead.  The normal sequence is for a pallet
 containing a bulb to move via conveyor to a read/write station where
 information is taken from and added to the pallet.  The pallet is conveyed
 through several different processes, being read/written on roughly 8
 occasions.  One of the processes contains an RF generator.  We are
 experiencing problems with the RFID system when the RF generators are on.
 The read/write system operates properly when the RF generators are off.
 We have determined that the RF generators are creating an interference
 that does not allow the RFID to operate properly.  Initially, w!
 e built copper shields in the area of some 
 of the RFID stationary heads.  This did not seem to help.  We also placed
 EMI suppressors on the RFID cables(near the read heads).  This also was
 not helpful.  I have spoken to a company that suggested the use of Ferrite
 tiles to absorb the interfering waves.  The problem with these tiles is
 that they are very brittle and difficult to use for shields.  The concept
 sounds good but I don't have much flexibility in where I can place the
 shields.  I am currently trying to use ferrite magnets attached to the
 copper guards.  Any help/suggestions you could give me would be greatly
 appreciated.  
 ===end paste==
 Thanks for any suggestions; reply as you see fit.
 
 WmFlanigan
 
 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
 
 Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
 
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc
 
 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
  Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net
 
 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
  Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
 
 All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
 messages are imported into the new server.
 

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.