[PSES] Extension of a method to measure voltage breakdown and charge objects
Hi All, Just posted my Technical Tidbit for the month at http://emcesd.com or alternately http://DesertLabRat.com . Technical Tidbit - September 2012 Measuring Breakdown Voltage and Charging Objects With an ESD Simulator - Part 2 (A method that works with most ESD simulators) Abstract: Measuring breakdown voltage and charging objects using an ESD simulator are useful lab techniques for finding problems in a system design related to charging or breakdown such as those related to ESD or lightning. The July Technical Tidbit covered a simple method using a specific ESD simulator for this purpose. A general method is presented here that can be used with most ESD simulators. The link to the article is: http://www.emcesd.com/tt2012/tt091612.htm The previous article on this subject is at: http://www.emcesd.com/tt2012/tt072212.htm Doug -- -- ___ _Doug Smith \ / ) P.O. Box 60941 = Boulder City, NV 89006-0941 _ / \ / \ _TEL/FAX: 702-570-6108/570-6013 / /\ \ ] / /\ \ Mobile: 408-858-4528 | q-( ) | o | Email: d...@dsmith.org \ _ /]\ _ / Web: http://www.dsmith.org -- - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald dhe...@gmail.com
R: R: R: Voltage Breakdown
Hi Rich and all others: Thanks a lot for clarifying this issue. I was living with one wrong idea about electro-static build-up mechanisms until you guys got me the right explanation. This to me is another confirmation of the value of this forum. Thank you again, Paolo -Messaggio originale- Da: Rich Nute [SMTP:ri...@sdd.hp.com] Inviato:mercoledì 12 luglio 2000 18.40 A: paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it Oggetto:Re: R: R: Voltage Breakdown Hi Paolo: From the other responses to your question, it appears that there are several phenomena that apply. Upon reading the other responses, and reading the referenced web sites, it appears that, in a humid atmosphere, build-up of electrostatic charge is limited by micro-condensation on material surfaces, which tend to bleed off charge before it can build to a value sufficient to break down the electric strength of the air. So, there appears to be no conflict between the fact that humid air has a slightly higher dielectric strength than dry air, and the fact that humid air limits the build-up of surface charge compared to dry air. (I have not copied the list with this response, but I did want to reply to you personally since you had ask a question of me personally.) Best regards, Rich --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
RE: R: R: Voltage Breakdown
For many topical staticides (on IC tubes and containers) to function, the RH must be 25%. David Sterner Ademco Syosset NY __ Reply Separator _ Subject: Re: R: R: Voltage Breakdown Author: Jim Hulbert SMTP:hulbe...@pb.com at ADEMCONET List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date:7/12/2000 8:40 AM I must admit I am also confused. It is a fairly common practice and has proved quite effective to install humidifiers in enclosed environments to reduce the propensity for static electricity generation. Why does this work? Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer Pitney Bowes Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it on 07/12/2000 04:39:08 AM Please respond to Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it To: 'Rich Nute' ri...@sdd.hp.com cc: 'emc-p...@ieee.org' emc-p...@ieee.org (bcc: Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI) Subject: R: R: Voltage Breakdown Hi Rich: thanks for your reply. Now I regret to say that I am a bit confused. Based on what you say I don't understand why in dry weather you have more chances of high voltage ESD than in humid weather. As I said this is a common experience that anyone can confirm. I thought the explanation is that dry air has higher dielectric strength so higher electrostatic fields need to build up before a discharge. Another point suggesting the dependence from humidity is that the ESD standard EN 61000-4-2 specifies relative humidity among ambient conditions to control during ESD tests. Regards, Paolo -Messaggio originale- Da: Rich Nute [SMTP:ri...@sdd.hp.com] Inviato: marted --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
RE: R: Voltage Breakdown
Paolo, I would suggest while in an air gap humidity does not contribute that much, on an insulating surface the surface resistivity would be lowered, making it dissipative if not conductive. This in effect, removes the ESD build up of potential. The differences between gaps and surfaces are similar to those that are seen in creepage and clearance issues when dealing with insulation of hazardous voltages. The breakdown mechanisms are not the same. In the ESD case we prevent breakdown by providing a discharge path and in the second case we prevent breakdown by improving the insulation. -doug = Douglas E. Powell Regulatory Compliance Engineer Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. 1625 Sharp Point Dr. Ft. Collins, Co 80525 mailto:doug.pow...@aei.com http:\\www.advanced-energy.com\ = -Original Message- From: Paolo Roncone [mailto:paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 2:39 AM To: 'Rich Nute' Cc: 'emc-p...@ieee.org' Subject: R: R: Voltage Breakdown Hi Rich: thanks for your reply. Now I regret to say that I am a bit confused. Based on what you say I don't understand why in dry weather you have more chances of high voltage ESD than in humid weather. As I said this is a common experience that anyone can confirm. I thought the explanation is that dry air has higher dielectric strength so higher electrostatic fields need to build up before a discharge. Another point suggesting the dependence from humidity is that the ESD standard EN 61000-4-2 specifies relative humidity among ambient conditions to control during ESD tests. Regards, Paolo -Messaggio originale- Da: Rich Nute [SMTP:ri...@sdd.hp.com] Inviato:martedì 11 luglio 2000 19.39 A: paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it Cc: Product Safety Technical Committee Oggetto:Re: R: Voltage Breakdown Hi Paolo: what about relative humidity of air ? I believe breakdown voltage depends also on humidity content of air. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the water content of air, humidity, actually increases the dielectric strength of air by a slight amount. (Sorry, but I cannot cite where I read this.) As I recall, the increase is so small as to be negligible compared to all of the other factors affecting dielectric strength of air. Note that liquid water and gaseous water (water vapor) have entirely different physical properties. It is not unreasonable for water vapor to have a greater electric strength than air. For gases, according to the Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers: The relative dielectric strength, with few exceptions, tends upward with increasing molecular weight. The noble atomic gases (helium, argon, neon, etc.) are poorest... and have the lowest dielectric strengths. If we applied this generality (contrary to my initial assertion), then the electric strength of water vapor, H2O, should be less than that of either oxygen, O2, or nitrogen, N2. However, note that the actual number of molecules of water vapor in air at any temperature is very small compared to the number of molecules of oxygen and nitrogen. So, the reduction of dielectric strength by the presence of water vapor, if any, will be very small. Regards, Rich --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
RE: R: R: Voltage Breakdown
There are several references that talk about humidity control in handling ESD sensitive items: ESD Association - Electrostatic Discharge Control Handbook - The effects of humidity are most noticeable in garments, plastic packaging material, process tooling, fixtures, furniture, etc., which are non-metallic and may be easily charged. Low humidity indicates a lack of water vapor in the atmosphere. This lack of water vapor causes both volume and surface resistance to increase in most materials. Low humidity may also cause an increase in leakage resistance to the ground in the case of furniture and fixtures that are not hard grounded through a metallic path. EN100015-1 (1992) Protection of electrostatic sensitive parts - Low humidity severely reduces the dissipation effectiveness of materials used in certain types of worksurfaces, packaging and clothing. DOD-HDBK-263 ESD control handbook for protection of electrical and electronic parts, assemblies and equipment... - Humid air helps to dissipate electrostatic charges by keeping the surfaces moist, therefore increasing surface conductivity. Substantial electrostatic voltage levels can accumulate with a decrease in relative humidity (see table III). However, it is also evident from Table III that significant electrostatic voltages can still be generated with relative humidity as high as 90 percent. . Table III lists various events such as walking across a carpet and corresponding ES voltage levels at 10-20% RH, and 65-90% RH. There are a number of other EOS/ESD documents that I can't lay my hands on right now. The bottom line of all of these is that the phenomenon is not so much breakdown of air as it is dissipation of electrostatic charge. That is, the increased 'conductivity' of the air with higher water content dissipates the charge quicker and therefore the discharges are less intense (and less perceptible). Bob Martin, PE, NCE Sr. Technical Manager Intertek Testing Services http://www.etlsemko.com (978)263-2662 fax(978)263-7086 r...@itsqs.com The opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily those of my employer. -Original Message- From: Jim Hulbert [mailto:hulbe...@pb.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 8:41 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Re: R: R: Voltage Breakdown I must admit I am also confused. It is a fairly common practice and has proved quite effective to install humidifiers in enclosed environments to reduce the propensity for static electricity generation. Why does this work? Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer Pitney Bowes Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it on 07/12/2000 04:39:08 AM Please respond to Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it To: 'Rich Nute' ri...@sdd.hp.com cc: 'emc-p...@ieee.org' emc-p...@ieee.org (bcc: Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI) Subject: R: R: Voltage Breakdown Hi Rich: thanks for your reply. Now I regret to say that I am a bit confused. Based on what you say I don't understand why in dry weather you have more chances of high voltage ESD than in humid weather. As I said this is a common experience that anyone can confirm. I thought the explanation is that dry air has higher dielectric strength so higher electrostatic fields need to build up before a discharge. Another point suggesting the dependence from humidity is that the ESD standard EN 61000-4-2 specifies relative humidity among ambient conditions to control during ESD tests. Regards, Paolo -Messaggio originale- Da: Rich Nute [SMTP:ri...@sdd.hp.com] Inviato: marted --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
RE: R: R: Voltage Breakdown
In a quick search I found this: http://www.esdsystems.com/newsletters/v1issue3.htm It looks like a higher RH affects the ability of a surface to hold a charge. -Original Message- From: Jim Hulbert [mailto:hulbe...@pb.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 7:41 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Re: R: R: Voltage Breakdown I must admit I am also confused. It is a fairly common practice and has proved quite effective to install humidifiers in enclosed environments to reduce the propensity for static electricity generation. Why does this work? Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer Pitney Bowes Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it on 07/12/2000 04:39:08 AM Please respond to Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it To: 'Rich Nute' ri...@sdd.hp.com cc: 'emc-p...@ieee.org' emc-p...@ieee.org (bcc: Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI) Subject: R: R: Voltage Breakdown Hi Rich: thanks for your reply. Now I regret to say that I am a bit confused. Based on what you say I don't understand why in dry weather you have more chances of high voltage ESD than in humid weather. As I said this is a common experience that anyone can confirm. I thought the explanation is that dry air has higher dielectric strength so higher electrostatic fields need to build up before a discharge. Another point suggesting the dependence from humidity is that the ESD standard EN 61000-4-2 specifies relative humidity among ambient conditions to control during ESD tests. Regards, Paolo -Messaggio originale- Da: Rich Nute [SMTP:ri...@sdd.hp.com] Inviato: marted --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
Re: Voltage Breakdown
Hi Paolo and Jim! I think I found the answer to your doubts in the IEEE Std. 142-1991, IEEE Recommended Practice for Grounding Look at section 3.2.6.3 Humidity Control (that I largely quote in the following). (If my understanding is right), the ambient relative humidity has a big influence on the surface conductivity of many insulating materials (such as fabrics, etc.). The higher the humidity, the greater the surface conductivity. At normal humidity (30% or more) an invisible film of water provides an electrical leakage path over most solid insulating bodies (and the clothes and shoes of a worker), which drains away static charges as fast as they are generated. When relative humidity is 30% or less the same materials dry out and become good insulators and static manifestations become noticeable. To summarize, my understanding of IEEE Std. 142-1991 is that low humidity makes easier the trapping of charges on poor-conductive bodies entering into contact. This makes ESD more likely and more intense. The increased dielectric strength of dry air should be (by far?) not enough to compensate for the more intensive charging (and higher electric field). This is my drei Groschen interpretation of IEEE Std. 142-1991. Cheers! Canio Dichirico European Southern Observatory Technical Division - Electronic Systems Department Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2 D-85748 Garching bei München Tel./Fax +49-89-3200 6500 Fax +49-89-320 23 62 email: cdich...@eso.org website: www.eso.org - Original Message - From: Jim Hulbert hulbe...@pb.com To: emc-p...@ieee.org Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 14:40 Subject: Re: R: R: Voltage Breakdown I must admit I am also confused. It is a fairly common practice and has proved quite effective to install humidifiers in enclosed environments to reduce the propensity for static electricity generation. Why does this work? Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer Pitney Bowes Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it on 07/12/2000 04:39:08 AM Please respond to Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it To: 'Rich Nute' ri...@sdd.hp.com cc: 'emc-p...@ieee.org' emc-p...@ieee.org (bcc: Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI) Subject: R: R: Voltage Breakdown Hi Rich: thanks for your reply. Now I regret to say that I am a bit confused. Based on what you say I don't understand why in dry weather you have more chances of high voltage ESD than in humid weather. As I said this is a common experience that anyone can confirm. I thought the explanation is that dry air has higher dielectric strength so higher electrostatic fields need to build up before a discharge. Another point suggesting the dependence from humidity is that the ESD standard EN 61000-4-2 specifies relative humidity among ambient conditions to control during ESD tests. Regards, Paolo -Messaggio originale- Da: Rich Nute [SMTP:ri...@sdd.hp.com] Inviato: marted ì 11 luglio 2000 19.39 A: paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it Cc: Product Safety Technical Committee Oggetto: Re: R: Voltage Breakdown Hi Paolo: what about relative humidity of air ? I believe breakdown voltage depends also on humidity content of air. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the water content of air, humidity, actually increases the dielectric strength of air by a slight amount. (Sorry, but I cannot cite where I read this.) As I recall, the increase is so small as to be negligible compared to all of the other factors affecting dielectric strength of air. Note that liquid water and gaseous water (water vapor) have entirely different physical properties. It is not unreasonable for water vapor to have a greater electric strength than air. For gases, according to the Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers: The relative dielectric strength, with few exceptions, tends upward with increasing molecular weight. The noble atomic gases (helium, argon, neon, etc.) are poorest... and have the lowest dielectric strengths. If we applied this generality (contrary to my initial assertion), then the electric strength of water vapor, H2O, should be less than that of either oxygen, O2, or nitrogen, N2. However, note that the actual number of molecules of water vapor in air at any temperature is very small compared to the number of molecules of oxygen and nitrogen. So, the reduction of dielectric strength by the presence of water vapor, if any, will be very small. Regards, Rich --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad
Re: R: R: Voltage Breakdown
I must admit I am also confused. It is a fairly common practice and has proved quite effective to install humidifiers in enclosed environments to reduce the propensity for static electricity generation. Why does this work? Jim Hulbert Senior Engineer Pitney Bowes Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it on 07/12/2000 04:39:08 AM Please respond to Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it To: 'Rich Nute' ri...@sdd.hp.com cc: 'emc-p...@ieee.org' emc-p...@ieee.org (bcc: Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI) Subject: R: R: Voltage Breakdown Hi Rich: thanks for your reply. Now I regret to say that I am a bit confused. Based on what you say I don't understand why in dry weather you have more chances of high voltage ESD than in humid weather. As I said this is a common experience that anyone can confirm. I thought the explanation is that dry air has higher dielectric strength so higher electrostatic fields need to build up before a discharge. Another point suggesting the dependence from humidity is that the ESD standard EN 61000-4-2 specifies relative humidity among ambient conditions to control during ESD tests. Regards, Paolo -Messaggio originale- Da: Rich Nute [SMTP:ri...@sdd.hp.com] Inviato: marted ì 11 luglio 2000 19.39 A: paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it Cc: Product Safety Technical Committee Oggetto: Re: R: Voltage Breakdown Hi Paolo: what about relative humidity of air ? I believe breakdown voltage depends also on humidity content of air. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the water content of air, humidity, actually increases the dielectric strength of air by a slight amount. (Sorry, but I cannot cite where I read this.) As I recall, the increase is so small as to be negligible compared to all of the other factors affecting dielectric strength of air. Note that liquid water and gaseous water (water vapor) have entirely different physical properties. It is not unreasonable for water vapor to have a greater electric strength than air. For gases, according to the Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers: The relative dielectric strength, with few exceptions, tends upward with increasing molecular weight. The noble atomic gases (helium, argon, neon, etc.) are poorest... and have the lowest dielectric strengths. If we applied this generality (contrary to my initial assertion), then the electric strength of water vapor, H2O, should be less than that of either oxygen, O2, or nitrogen, N2. However, note that the actual number of molecules of water vapor in air at any temperature is very small compared to the number of molecules of oxygen and nitrogen. So, the reduction of dielectric strength by the presence of water vapor, if any, will be very small. Regards, Rich --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
R: R: Voltage Breakdown
Hi Rich: thanks for your reply. Now I regret to say that I am a bit confused. Based on what you say I don't understand why in dry weather you have more chances of high voltage ESD than in humid weather. As I said this is a common experience that anyone can confirm. I thought the explanation is that dry air has higher dielectric strength so higher electrostatic fields need to build up before a discharge. Another point suggesting the dependence from humidity is that the ESD standard EN 61000-4-2 specifies relative humidity among ambient conditions to control during ESD tests. Regards, Paolo -Messaggio originale- Da: Rich Nute [SMTP:ri...@sdd.hp.com] Inviato:martedì 11 luglio 2000 19.39 A: paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it Cc: Product Safety Technical Committee Oggetto:Re: R: Voltage Breakdown Hi Paolo: what about relative humidity of air ? I believe breakdown voltage depends also on humidity content of air. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the water content of air, humidity, actually increases the dielectric strength of air by a slight amount. (Sorry, but I cannot cite where I read this.) As I recall, the increase is so small as to be negligible compared to all of the other factors affecting dielectric strength of air. Note that liquid water and gaseous water (water vapor) have entirely different physical properties. It is not unreasonable for water vapor to have a greater electric strength than air. For gases, according to the Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers: The relative dielectric strength, with few exceptions, tends upward with increasing molecular weight. The noble atomic gases (helium, argon, neon, etc.) are poorest... and have the lowest dielectric strengths. If we applied this generality (contrary to my initial assertion), then the electric strength of water vapor, H2O, should be less than that of either oxygen, O2, or nitrogen, N2. However, note that the actual number of molecules of water vapor in air at any temperature is very small compared to the number of molecules of oxygen and nitrogen. So, the reduction of dielectric strength by the presence of water vapor, if any, will be very small. Regards, Rich --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
R: Voltage Breakdown
Hi, what about relative humidity of air ? I believe breakdown voltage depends also on humidity content of air. One thing anybody can experience is the much higher frequency of ESD jolts one gets in dry weather vs. humid weather. Anyone knows a quantitative relation or formula ? my penny's worth... Regards Paolo Roncone -Messaggio originale- Da: bogdan matoga [SMTP:bogda...@pacbell.net] Inviato:sabato 8 luglio 2000 22.57 A: Rich Nute Cc: allen_tu...@pairgain.com; emc-p...@ieee.org Oggetto:Re: Voltage Breakdown Gentlemen: Let me add my penny's worth to Rich's information. a. Parallel plates provide a homogenous field only in their center, the field fringes at the edges. (One could configure the plates according to Rogowski form). b. The breakdown voltage is not a linear function, even for spherical electrodes. What applies is Paschen's law, which gives the voltage as a function of distance x atmospheric pressure. Have fun! Regards, Bogdan. Rich Nute wrote: Hi Allen: The voltage breakdown of air is presented in IEC 664. There is no fixed number (i.e., mm/kV) that describes or predicts voltage breakdown of air. The principle factor that affects voltage breakdown is the shape of the electrodes (degree of homogeneousness of the electric field between the two electrodes). The more homogeneous the field, the higher the breakdown voltage, and vice versa. For example, at 2 mm, the breakdown of an inhomogeneous field is about 2.5 kV, while the breakdown of an homogeneous field is almost 8 kv! An homogeneous field is created by two parallel planes. An inhomogeneous field is created by a needle-point and a plane. The second factor that affects voltage breakdown of air is the voltage waveshape. The more impulse-type waveshape, the higher the breakdown voltage; the more sinusoidal-type waveshape, the lower the breakdown voltage. The third factor that affects voltage breakdown of air is the air pressure. The higher the air pressure, the higher the breakdown voltage, and vice-versa (Paschen's Law). There are still other factors such as temperature, but these are minor effects compared to the first three. If you are interested, I can send a Powerpoint 4.0 file of the voltage-distance curves of the homogeneousness effect. It covers the distance range from 0 to 2 mm for both homogeneous and inhomogeneous fields for sinsoidal waveforms. The data is taken from IEC 664. Best regards, Rich --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
Re: Voltage Breakdown
Hi A 5 kV peak voltage between needle points will produce a spark 0.42 centimeters. See Handbook of Chemistry and Physics under Spark-Gap Voltages. There is a table for spark gap distance versus voltage and electrode shape. There are also corrections for temperature and pressure. The work was published by the American Institute of Electric Engineers. I do not know the original date of publication. I believe the AIEE and the Institute of Radio Engineers formed the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in 1965. Regards Bob Schlentz --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
Re: Voltage Breakdown
Gentlemen: Let me add my penny's worth to Rich's information. a. Parallel plates provide a homogenous field only in their center, the field fringes at the edges. (One could configure the plates according to Rogowski form). b. The breakdown voltage is not a linear function, even for spherical electrodes. What applies is Paschen's law, which gives the voltage as a function of distance x atmospheric pressure. Have fun! Regards, Bogdan. Rich Nute wrote: Hi Allen: The voltage breakdown of air is presented in IEC 664. There is no fixed number (i.e., mm/kV) that describes or predicts voltage breakdown of air. The principle factor that affects voltage breakdown is the shape of the electrodes (degree of homogeneousness of the electric field between the two electrodes). The more homogeneous the field, the higher the breakdown voltage, and vice versa. For example, at 2 mm, the breakdown of an inhomogeneous field is about 2.5 kV, while the breakdown of an homogeneous field is almost 8 kv! An homogeneous field is created by two parallel planes. An inhomogeneous field is created by a needle-point and a plane. The second factor that affects voltage breakdown of air is the voltage waveshape. The more impulse-type waveshape, the higher the breakdown voltage; the more sinusoidal-type waveshape, the lower the breakdown voltage. The third factor that affects voltage breakdown of air is the air pressure. The higher the air pressure, the higher the breakdown voltage, and vice-versa (Paschen's Law). There are still other factors such as temperature, but these are minor effects compared to the first three. If you are interested, I can send a Powerpoint 4.0 file of the voltage-distance curves of the homogeneousness effect. It covers the distance range from 0 to 2 mm for both homogeneous and inhomogeneous fields for sinsoidal waveforms. The data is taken from IEC 664. Best regards, Rich --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
Re: Voltage Breakdown
Hi Allen: The voltage breakdown of air is presented in IEC 664. There is no fixed number (i.e., mm/kV) that describes or predicts voltage breakdown of air. The principle factor that affects voltage breakdown is the shape of the electrodes (degree of homogeneousness of the electric field between the two electrodes). The more homogeneous the field, the higher the breakdown voltage, and vice versa. For example, at 2 mm, the breakdown of an inhomogeneous field is about 2.5 kV, while the breakdown of an homogeneous field is almost 8 kv! An homogeneous field is created by two parallel planes. An inhomogeneous field is created by a needle-point and a plane. The second factor that affects voltage breakdown of air is the voltage waveshape. The more impulse-type waveshape, the higher the breakdown voltage; the more sinusoidal-type waveshape, the lower the breakdown voltage. The third factor that affects voltage breakdown of air is the air pressure. The higher the air pressure, the higher the breakdown voltage, and vice-versa (Paschen's Law). There are still other factors such as temperature, but these are minor effects compared to the first three. If you are interested, I can send a Powerpoint 4.0 file of the voltage-distance curves of the homogeneousness effect. It covers the distance range from 0 to 2 mm for both homogeneous and inhomogeneous fields for sinsoidal waveforms. The data is taken from IEC 664. Best regards, Rich --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
Voltage Breakdown
I remember seeing a figure for voltage breakdown through air recently, but can't remember what it is. Seems like it's 1mm per 1000 volts or something like that. Can anyone help? Specifically, I'm concerned about how much spacing is required between components and chassis to guard against electric field coupling during an ESD event. Thanks. --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
Voltage Breakdown
I remember seeing a figure for voltage breakdown through air recently, but can't remember what it is. Seems like it's 1mm per 1000 volts or something like that. Can anyone help? Specifically, I'm concerned about how much spacing is required between components and chassis to guard against electric field coupling during an ESD event. Thanks. --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org