RE: safety testing in the USA

2002-09-20 Thread Rob . Humphrey

Dear All,

Thank you for your postings, it has given me enough ammunition to persuade the 
supplier
to change their point of view, they have now agreed to test correctly.

Regards Rob



- ---
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: safety testing in the USA

2002-09-20 Thread Gary McInturff

I've had to do all of those, even acting as the agent for the 
manufacturer to get the project off and running. But it was only done when 
there were unique situations - such as a custom power supply or something of 
that nature. If there was more than one choice it wasn't rocket science to weed 
out the suppliers who weren't advancing in the selection process.
Gary

-Original Message-
From: Peter Merguerian [mailto:pmerguer...@itl.co.il]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:39 AM
To: 'John Shinn'; rob.humph...@reuters.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: safety testing in the USA



Dear Friends,

Many times the vendor does not wish to obtain NRTL Listing because of the
investigation costs involved and the yearly follow-up costs.
One way that vendors might agree to submit their products for NRTL Listing
is to have the buyer pay for all the costs involved or even to share the
costs with the buyer.

Also please be aware that for small production runs, especially for large
and complex equipment, most manufacturers use the Field Evaluation Services
that most NRTLs offer these days. This type of investigation is very
subjective (construction and minimal non-destructive tests) since evaluation
is done at each installation site (first machine is checked thoroughly,
others are verified to be of identical construction).

Field evaluation is very popular with local inspectors in some US states,
especially Washington, Oregon and North Carolina.



This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If
you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, disseminate,
distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any way. If you
received this e-mail message in error, please return by forwarding the
message and its attachments to the sender.



PETER S. MERGUERIAN
Technical Director
I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
26 Hacharoshet St., POB 211
Or Yehuda 60251, Israel
Tel: + 972-(0)3-5339022  Fax: + 972-(0)3-5339019
Mobile: + 972-(0)54-838175
http://www.itl.co.il
http://www.i-spec.com





-Original Message-
From: John Shinn [mailto:john.sh...@sanmina-sci.com]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 12:27 AM
To: rob.humph...@reuters.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: safety testing in the USA



There has been some good responses to this post.  And it is, in general,
true
that a manufacturer is not mandated, by law, to have the product LISTED
by an appropriate Safety Testing Agency (NRTL).  However, it may be
required by the local inspection agency prior to installation. (This was
covered
in other posts).

However, if you, as the customer, requests that the product be tested and
listed by an
applicable NRTL, and the vendor is not willing to have the product tested
for compliance with the appropriate standard(s), then you should RUN
to the nearest exit and find another vendor.

Assume that a vendor, who is not willing to have their product tested and
listed for by an appropriate testing agency, is hiding something and  the
vendor
is aware that the product would not comply if tested.

OO
John Shinn, P.E.
Manager, Lab Operations
Sanmina-SCI


-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
rob.humph...@reuters.com
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 7:46 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: safety testing in the USA



Group,

I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our usual
policy to request testing to a listed standard
such as UL 60950 for safety in North America.

The supplier has replied that this is not mandatory.

Is he correct? what  compels safety testing for IT equipment in this
geography? is it mandated by law?

Thanks in advance for your opinions

Rob




- ---
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion

RE: safety testing in the USA

2002-09-20 Thread richwoods

Greg, OSHA regulations allow for an alternataive to Listing. The owner of
the equipment may create a construction file describing how safety is
accomplished and have the file available for OSHA review.

Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International


-Original Message-
From: Gregg Kervill [mailto:gr...@test4safety.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 6:53 PM
To: richwo...@tycoint.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: safety testing in the USA


Thanks for identifying the States Rich - I have tried to get that list for
ages.

BUT - There is an IMPORTANT caveat - if the product is to used where OSHA
rules apply then it is mandatory that the product be 'approved' by a NRTL of
which UL is the most easily identified. So if the product is for commercial
use - then there is a legal requirement to had it 'badged' by an NRTL.

Gregg

-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of richwo...@tycoint.com
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:48 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: safety testing in the USA


Some states (e.g., North Carolina), counties (e.g., Orange, CA) and cities
(e.g., Los Angeles and San Francisco)have a legal requirement that all
electrical products for sale must be Listed. Some local electrical codes
(e.g., Oregon) require electrical equipment be Listed. Since my company
sells products virtually everywhere in the USA, we List all of our products
including those powered by Class 2 sources. I recommend that you do the same
unless you know for a fact that your target locality has no legal
requirements for Listing.

Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International


-Original Message-
From: rob.humph...@reuters.com [mailto:rob.humph...@reuters.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:46 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: safety testing in the USA



Group,

I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our usual
policy to request testing to a listed standard
such as UL 60950 for safety in North America.

The supplier has replied that this is not mandatory.

Is he correct? what  compels safety testing for IT equipment in this
geography? is it mandated by law?

Thanks in advance for your opinions

Rob




- ---
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: safety testing in the USA

2002-09-20 Thread Peter Merguerian

Dear Friends,

Many times the vendor does not wish to obtain NRTL Listing because of the
investigation costs involved and the yearly follow-up costs.
One way that vendors might agree to submit their products for NRTL Listing
is to have the buyer pay for all the costs involved or even to share the
costs with the buyer.

Also please be aware that for small production runs, especially for large
and complex equipment, most manufacturers use the Field Evaluation Services
that most NRTLs offer these days. This type of investigation is very
subjective (construction and minimal non-destructive tests) since evaluation
is done at each installation site (first machine is checked thoroughly,
others are verified to be of identical construction).

Field evaluation is very popular with local inspectors in some US states,
especially Washington, Oregon and North Carolina.



This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If
you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, disseminate,
distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any way. If you
received this e-mail message in error, please return by forwarding the
message and its attachments to the sender.



PETER S. MERGUERIAN
Technical Director
I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
26 Hacharoshet St., POB 211
Or Yehuda 60251, Israel
Tel: + 972-(0)3-5339022  Fax: + 972-(0)3-5339019
Mobile: + 972-(0)54-838175
http://www.itl.co.il
http://www.i-spec.com





-Original Message-
From: John Shinn [mailto:john.sh...@sanmina-sci.com]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 12:27 AM
To: rob.humph...@reuters.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: safety testing in the USA



There has been some good responses to this post.  And it is, in general,
true
that a manufacturer is not mandated, by law, to have the product LISTED
by an appropriate Safety Testing Agency (NRTL).  However, it may be
required by the local inspection agency prior to installation. (This was
covered
in other posts).

However, if you, as the customer, requests that the product be tested and
listed by an
applicable NRTL, and the vendor is not willing to have the product tested
for compliance with the appropriate standard(s), then you should RUN
to the nearest exit and find another vendor.

Assume that a vendor, who is not willing to have their product tested and
listed for by an appropriate testing agency, is hiding something and  the
vendor
is aware that the product would not comply if tested.

OO
John Shinn, P.E.
Manager, Lab Operations
Sanmina-SCI


-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
rob.humph...@reuters.com
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 7:46 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: safety testing in the USA



Group,

I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our usual
policy to request testing to a listed standard
such as UL 60950 for safety in North America.

The supplier has replied that this is not mandatory.

Is he correct? what  compels safety testing for IT equipment in this
geography? is it mandated by law?

Thanks in advance for your opinions

Rob




- ---
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

RE: safety testing in the USA

2002-09-20 Thread Gregg Kervill

Thanks for identifying the States Rich - I have tried to get that list for
ages.

BUT - There is an IMPORTANT caveat - if the product is to used where OSHA
rules apply then it is mandatory that the product be 'approved' by a NRTL of
which UL is the most easily identified. So if the product is for commercial
use - then there is a legal requirement to had it 'badged' by an NRTL.

Gregg

-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of richwo...@tycoint.com
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:48 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: safety testing in the USA


Some states (e.g., North Carolina), counties (e.g., Orange, CA) and cities
(e.g., Los Angeles and San Francisco)have a legal requirement that all
electrical products for sale must be Listed. Some local electrical codes
(e.g., Oregon) require electrical equipment be Listed. Since my company
sells products virtually everywhere in the USA, we List all of our products
including those powered by Class 2 sources. I recommend that you do the same
unless you know for a fact that your target locality has no legal
requirements for Listing.

Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International


-Original Message-
From: rob.humph...@reuters.com [mailto:rob.humph...@reuters.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:46 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: safety testing in the USA



Group,

I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our usual
policy to request testing to a listed standard
such as UL 60950 for safety in North America.

The supplier has replied that this is not mandatory.

Is he correct? what  compels safety testing for IT equipment in this
geography? is it mandated by law?

Thanks in advance for your opinions

Rob




- ---
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Re: safety testing in the USA

2002-09-20 Thread Rich Nute





Hi Rob:


   I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our 
 usual policy to request testing to a listed standard
   such as UL 60950 for safety in North America.
   
   The supplier has replied that this is not mandatory.
   
   Is he correct? what  compels safety testing for IT equipment in this 
 geography? is it mandated by law?

I am going to interpret your statement of safety
testing as meaning safety certification.

In the USA, there are two sets of regulations that
are mandated by law:

1.  Workplace regulations (OSHA).

2.  Electrical installation regulations (NEC).

Between these two sets of regulations, almost 
every sales situation is covered.

Each of these has two alternatives:

1.  Test each unit in place.

2.  Third-party certification.

Technically, your supplier is correct.  Third-party
safety certification is NOT mandatory (because 
testing each unit in place is the alternative).

Practically, your supplier is wrong.  Third-party
safety certification avoids testing each unit in
place.

In the USA, governments cannot mandate testing by
a private party (which is the case of third-party
safety certification houses).  Consequently, the
regulations promulgated under various laws prescribe
testing in place, with an alternative of third-
party certification to a national standard, i.e., 
an ANSI standard.


Best regards,
Rich




---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: safety testing in the USA

2002-09-19 Thread John Shinn

There has been some good responses to this post.  And it is, in general,
true
that a manufacturer is not mandated, by law, to have the product LISTED
by an appropriate Safety Testing Agency (NRTL).  However, it may be
required by the local inspection agency prior to installation. (This was
covered
in other posts).

However, if you, as the customer, requests that the product be tested and
listed by an
applicable NRTL, and the vendor is not willing to have the product tested
for compliance with the appropriate standard(s), then you should RUN
to the nearest exit and find another vendor.

Assume that a vendor, who is not willing to have their product tested and
listed for by an appropriate testing agency, is hiding something and  the
vendor
is aware that the product would not comply if tested.

OO
John Shinn, P.E.
Manager, Lab Operations
Sanmina-SCI


-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
rob.humph...@reuters.com
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 7:46 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: safety testing in the USA



Group,

I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our usual
policy to request testing to a listed standard
such as UL 60950 for safety in North America.

The supplier has replied that this is not mandatory.

Is he correct? what  compels safety testing for IT equipment in this
geography? is it mandated by law?

Thanks in advance for your opinions

Rob




- ---
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: safety testing in the USA

2002-09-19 Thread Sam Davis

Another interesting point that can be made is I didn't say it was law, I
said List it or I won't buy it.  Depending on the product (basically, if
there's a Listed competitor product on the market), you can make it happen.
In the US, often a Listing mark is enforced by marketing more than law.
Many retail stores have the requirement of products they put on the shelf to
be Listed, thereby passing on the liability, and reducing their insurance
costs.

just my 2 cents (I've got the paystub to prove it)
Sam

-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
rob.humph...@reuters.com
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 9:46 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: safety testing in the USA



Group,

I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our usual
policy to request testing to a listed standard
such as UL 60950 for safety in North America.

The supplier has replied that this is not mandatory.

Is he correct? what  compels safety testing for IT equipment in this
geography? is it mandated by law?

Thanks in advance for your opinions

Rob




- ---
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Re: safety testing in the USA

2002-09-19 Thread Rich Nute




Hi Rob:


   I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our 
 usual policy to request testing to a listed standard
   such as UL 60950 for safety in North America.
   
   The supplier has replied that this is not mandatory.
   
   Is he correct? what  compels safety testing for IT equipment in this 
 geography? is it mandated by law?

I am going to interpret your statement of safety
testing as meaning safety certification.

In the USA, there are two sets of regulations that
are mandated by law:

1.  Workplace regulations (OSHA).

2.  Electrical installation regulations (NEC).

Between these two sets of regulations, almost 
every sales situation is covered.

Each of these has two alternatives:

1.  Test each unit in place.

2.  Third-party certification.

Technically, your supplier is correct.  Third-party
safety certification is NOT mandatory (because 
testing each unit in place is the alternative).

Practically, your supplier is wrong.  Third-party
safety certification avoids testing each unit in
place.

In the USA, governments cannot mandate testing by
a private party (which is the case of third-party
safety certification houses).  Consequently, the
regulations promulgated under various laws prescribe
testing in place, with an alternative of third-
party certification to a national standard, i.e., 
an ANSI standard.


Best regards,
Rich




---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: safety testing in the USA

2002-09-19 Thread richwoods

Here is a very good discussion of the leagalities.

http://www.conformity.com/A02F18.pdf

Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International


-Original Message-
From: Gary McInturff [mailto:gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:40 PM
To: rob.humph...@reuters.com; EMC-PSTC (E-mail)
Subject: RE: safety testing in the USA



Rob.
Required is an interesting term, and this is a long debate involving
OSHA, National Electrical Code, fire codes and when and if anybody inspects
the equipment before its installed.
There are places that you probably would be alright, some that you
wouldn't probably be caught even if it wasn't right,  and then there are
places like the City of LA that seems to have a pretty rigorous inspection
policy. They by the way can give you a City of LA inspection, but it isn't
of any real value outside of LA.
Then there are customers that use the safety marks in an attempt to
reduce their liability by showing they have done what any reasonable
manufacturer would do to protect customers. 
So short pragmatic answer, in my opinion, yes you need it.
Gary
The debate rages on


-Original Message-
From: rob.humph...@reuters.com [mailto:rob.humph...@reuters.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 7:46 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: safety testing in the USA



Group,

I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our usual
policy to request testing to a listed standard
such as UL 60950 for safety in North America.

The supplier has replied that this is not mandatory.

Is he correct? what  compels safety testing for IT equipment in this
geography? is it mandated by law?

Thanks in advance for your opinions

Rob




- ---
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: safety testing in the USA

2002-09-19 Thread richwoods

Some states (e.g., North Carolina), counties (e.g., Orange, CA) and cities
(e.g., Los Angeles and San Francisco)have a legal requirement that all
electrical products for sale must be Listed. Some local electrical codes
(e.g., Oregon) require electrical equipment be Listed. Since my company
sells products virtually everywhere in the USA, we List all of our products
including those powered by Class 2 sources. I recommend that you do the same
unless you know for a fact that your target locality has no legal
requirements for Listing.

Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International


-Original Message-
From: rob.humph...@reuters.com [mailto:rob.humph...@reuters.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:46 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: safety testing in the USA



Group,

I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our usual
policy to request testing to a listed standard
such as UL 60950 for safety in North America.

The supplier has replied that this is not mandatory.

Is he correct? what  compels safety testing for IT equipment in this
geography? is it mandated by law?

Thanks in advance for your opinions

Rob




- ---
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: safety testing in the USA

2002-09-19 Thread Gary McInturff

Rob.
Required is an interesting term, and this is a long debate involving 
OSHA, National Electrical Code, fire codes and when and if anybody inspects the 
equipment before its installed.
There are places that you probably would be alright, some that you 
wouldn't probably be caught even if it wasn't right,  and then there are places 
like the City of LA that seems to have a pretty rigorous inspection policy. 
They by the way can give you a City of LA inspection, but it isn't of any real 
value outside of LA.
Then there are customers that use the safety marks in an attempt to 
reduce their liability by showing they have done what any reasonable 
manufacturer would do to protect customers. 
So short pragmatic answer, in my opinion, yes you need it.
Gary
The debate rages on


-Original Message-
From: rob.humph...@reuters.com [mailto:rob.humph...@reuters.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 7:46 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: safety testing in the USA



Group,

I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our usual 
policy to request testing to a listed standard
such as UL 60950 for safety in North America.

The supplier has replied that this is not mandatory.

Is he correct? what  compels safety testing for IT equipment in this geography? 
is it mandated by law?

Thanks in advance for your opinions

Rob




- ---
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


safety testing in the USA

2002-09-19 Thread Rob . Humphrey

Group,

I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our usual 
policy to request testing to a listed standard
such as UL 60950 for safety in North America.

The supplier has replied that this is not mandatory.

Is he correct? what  compels safety testing for IT equipment in this geography? 
is it mandated by law?

Thanks in advance for your opinions

Rob




- ---
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list