[EVDL] Electron Automotive - Any experiences?

2016-09-08 Thread Michael Kadie via EV
I have a friend that bought a Chevy Volt with front end damage.  He replace the 
charger and charger connector and fixed the front end damage.  The Chevy dealer 
says its throwing codes and 'no one will touch it'.
Any recommendations?
Any opinions about Electron Automotive?  We are in LA

Thanks,

Michael Tyrannosaurus Kadie

___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] BMS/ leaf 60ah vs calb 60ah cells

2015-06-29 Thread Michael Kadie via EV

How soon do you need it?
We have been testing our BMS with leaf cells for 6 months and will be making 
it available soon.   We have to finish our commitments to all of the people 
that signed up during our Beta program.

White paper https://goo.gl/knJmun

Michael 'T-Rex' Kadie
Simple Solutions Inclusive / SSI-Racing

-Original Message- 
From: ken via EV

Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 9:21 AM
To: damon henry ; Electric Vehicle Discussion List
Subject: [EVDL] BMS/ leaf 60ah vs calb 60ah cells

Is there anohter BMS to use for leafs cells dicides orion?

for like 125 volts?

___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)


___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] EVLN: Open Source Street-Legal affordable long-range EV4the masses

2015-05-18 Thread Michael Kadie via EV
The correlation between weight and efficiency is true below 45 mph in 
general.  Above 45 mph aerodynamics starts being more important than weight. 
This is why the the heavy first generation Toyota prius has good highway 
MPG.  In general the stop and go nature of travel below 45 mph overwhelms 
the greater efficiency.
We used a hill between my house and shop to work on the aerodynamics of my 
car.  After playing with cardboard and tape (then later vinyl) we increased 
the coast downhill speed by 15 mph and decreased my 1/8 mile time by 2/10 
with the same trap speed.  After this my 2000 pound Daytona-look-a-like went 
from around 350 wh/mile to 312 wh/mile driving 15 miles with 6 stop lights 4 
stop signs and a large hill and no-regeneration in both directions.  This 
was testing done for X-prize competition and was well measured.



-Original Message- 
From: tomw via EV

Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 10:09 AM
To: ev@lists.evdl.org
Subject: Re: [EVDL] EVLN: Open Source Street-Legal affordable long-range 
EV4the masses


The numbers you post for Tesla do not include charger losses, the 216 
Wh/mile

does.  The 196 Wh/mile number should be compared.  Either way 216 or 196 is
far less energy/mile than a Tesla S uses, so more efficient at moving one
human around, which is the typical occupancy.

Maybe you are considering efficiency as energy/mile-weight.  Then the Tesla
would be 325/4750 lb = 0.068 to 375/4750 = 0.079 and my car would be
196/2260 = 0.087, so the Tesla moves a unit weight more efficiently than my
car assuming those numbers represent the same 50% mix of highway and city
driving.



--
View this message in context: 
http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/Re-EVLN-Open-Source-Street-Legal-affordable-long-range-EV-4the-masses-tp4675590p4675619.html
Sent from the Electric Vehicle Discussion List mailing list archive at 
Nabble.com.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)


___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] EVLN: Open Source Street-Legal affordable long-range EV4the masses

2015-05-17 Thread Michael Kadie via EV
Generally speaking hub motors without shafts have a high unsprung weight and 
therefore have a rougher ride and a lot of stress on the motor.
24 kwh = 186 miles is more what I have problems with.  4 miles / kwh is 
great efficiency better than Tesla.  The article did mention a max speed of 
47 mph and rule of thumb at 45 mph aerodynamic forces are not significant so 
light weight vehicle does very well.


Michael 'T-Rex' Kadie

-Original Message- 
From: EVDL Administrator via EV

Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 8:08 PM
To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
Subject: Re: [EVDL] EVLN: Open Source Street-Legal affordable long-range 
EV4the masses


On 17 May 2015 at 19:22, Mike Nickerson via EV wrote:

Personally, my skepticism revolves around the hub motors (pun intended). 
Lots

of people have tried them, and few or none have succeeded.


I'm sure I've missed some of the attempts, but this is one I recall that
came close to success (though nowhere near production).  They mention some
handling problems but (I think) blame them on the somewhat high CG and
narrow track.

http://www.gaura.com/ev/luciole/index_e.html

I have to confess that I've been smitten with this little gem since I first
read of it in the late 1990s.  It's impressive design work for college
students, quite refined.  What a pity it never even got close to production.

David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA
EVDL Administrator

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
EVDL Information: http://www.evdl.org/help/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Note: mail sent to evpost and etpost addresses will not
reach me.  To send a private message, please obtain my
email address from the webpage http://www.evdl.org/help/ .
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)


___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] charging two parallel packs in series

2015-03-26 Thread Michael Kadie via EV

So I drew a really crude wiring diagram.  http://goo.gl/kAj5wH

Note that it is important the two packs are balanced within a few volts of
each other after the series charging.  Otherwise when you reconnect them in
parallel they will arc across the connector and cross charge at a VERY HIGH
AMPERAGE.

T-Rex / KD
SSI-Racing

-Original Message- 
From: Steve Clunn via EV

Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 7:15 AM
To: ev@lists.evdl.org
Subject: [EVDL] charging two parallel packs in series


Subject: [EVDL] Open Circuit Voltage Across Contactors


I've got two Anderson contacts on my pack, one on the negative side
and one on the positive side.  So when the key is out of the ignition,
the controller and all other components are separated from the
traction pack.  I currently have a 120V system, with two strings in
parallel, because I have a Curtis controller, which has a 144V max.  I
would, however, like to be able to charge faster with my PFC-30.  So
my question is, if I reconfigure the packs to be in series for
charging, is there any problem, since both contactors will be open?

Bill

This could be done safely by leaving one pack ( pack A ) hooked up
normally then using two Anderson connectors with your charger  being
the only thing connected to pack B's battery plus ,chargers neg will
go to pack A's neg. Pack B will hook to pack A using a 175amp or
bigger Anderson disconnect with pack A's pluses going to pack B's plus
and A's neg to B's neg , this will be for driving and parallel
charging . Pull the disconnect and plug in a Anderson jumper plug
which will connect the A packs positive to the B packs negative and
now your are charging in series. If you forget to switch back , no big
deal you will just be running on pack A . A few ways to set up these
Anderson's , I think the 175 amp Anderson would be big enough . I
would have one on pack A and 2 and pack B ( one for series and one for
parallel ) The series plug will have its b+ plug going to the B packs
neg .

shameless plug ,, we sell them but there not on the web site


Steve Clunn
Merging the best of the past with
the best of the future.
www.Greenshedconversions.com
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)


___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)



Re: [EVDL] Open source software to control donor ICE's CPUs

2014-10-05 Thread Michael Kadie via EV
So in general there is a huge liability issue from the OEM having to do with 
air bag time, fly-by-wire pedals etc.
That said here is a project I saw at the Detroit Electric and Hybrid vehicle 
show

http://www.pi-innovo.com/products/openecu
When I talked with them they mentioned that they felt their hardware was a 
good fit for prototype vehicles and conversions.


Michael 'T-Rex' Kadie
-Original Message- 
From: Adrian DeLeon via EV

Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2014 6:06 PM
To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Open source software to control donor ICE's CPUs


On 10/05/2014 11:37 AM, Michael Ross via EV wrote:

Automotive CPU, MPU, ECU, etc. are often designed using in ASICs
(Application Specific Integrated Circuits) and nowadays FPGAs (Field Gate
Programmable Arrays).  The software is not served up by a drive, or kept 
on

a flashable EEPROM, it is literally built into the silicon.

snip

It may require the
original the development system to reprogram it.  Or it can only be
reprogrammed by replacing chips and boards - meaning it is very unlikely a
DIYer will have the ability to hack it.


That's exactly what chipping an ICE does. Replaces or reprograms a
memory chip that contains data tables used by the car's software. It's a
relatively safe process as you can only screw up the ICE's power profile
and emissions output but can't cause the onboard computer (and maybe the
car) to crash.

The only viable open source solution would be to design a carputer that
can read the car's original sensors, process the data, and use that to
control the fuel injection, dash, door locks, etc. In the case of a
Tesla, it might run the charger/inverter. Unfortunately, most
EV-specific hardware probably has its own computer system that expects
to send/receive proprietary and possibly encrypted data - making it
close to impossible to control with a DIY computer unless MUCH help and
documentation is provided by the OEM.

Related story: A  friend of mine converted a 2000-ish VW Jetta using a
series DC motor. His biggest headache was the low oil pressure buzzer in
the instrument cluster. Without a valid reading, the buzzer would go off
constantly. He cooked up a circuit that would send a normal oil
pressure reading, then proceeded to get startled at every stoplight! The
dash computer would see the motor RPM drop to 0, notice the oil pressure
was still normal... and set the buzzer off! Don't know if he ever
managed to trick the instrument cluster into staying quiet. Didn't want
to kill the buzzer as it is also used as a headlight reminder, seatbelt
warning, etc.

-Adrian

___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)


___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)