Re: Could we live forever?
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 spudboy100 via Everything List < everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > Probably better to ask if immortal uploads would spend their times living > in underground computer network facilities for ages, or would they roam the > galaxy, searching for biology? Will humans spend their time living in boxes made of bone perched precariously on their shoulders or would they roam the galaxy, searching for other bone boxes ? John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Could we live forever?
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 Brent Meekerwrote: > >> >> >> If you knew you were immortal why on earth would you be risk averse? > > > > Not having a built in biological life span is very different from being > immortal. Immortal means you can't die. > Immortality isn't a deep concept, it just means making sure the atoms in your biological brain, or its functional equivalent, always remained in their correct orientation. Immortality is simply a matter of maintaining organization, and with nanotechnology that would be easy. > > > you will eventually die from some > accident. > That's why you'd need lots of backup copies stashed in lots of different places, and with nanotechnology that would be easy. > > > or illness. > You will never die of illness if you have the ability to ensure that the atoms in your body always remain in their correct orientation, and with nanotechnology that would be easy. > > Uploading" isn't some well defined process Uploading is very well defined, it's just not achievable yet for technological not scientific or philosophical reasons: Uploading is the functional equivalent of a biological brain in electronic form. > > You could be "uploaded" today by having a team of people research your > appearance, personality, thinking, preferences, speech, etc. and > incorporating them into a computer program with sensory inputs and some > Watson like AI. It would produce a Max Headroom like John Clark who would > continue to berate Bruno for his use of pronouns and other signs of > intelligence. Intelligent behavior is a much deeper property than consciousness, so if it's got John Clark's intelligence (or better) that's good enough for me. > > > Would it be conscious?...who knows. That is nothing new, that is the same sort of uncertainty every human being who has ever lived must face. Was the original John Clark conscious? Only the original John Clark knows for sure. > > Would it be recognizably John Clark...sure. That is good enough for me. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Could we live forever?
On 17 Sep 2015, at 00:16, Brent Meeker wrote: On 9/16/2015 10:39 AM, John Clark wrote: On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 , spudboy100 via Everything Listwrote: > It seems, at this point, that the time for uploading is far, far, away. It could emerge out of neuroscience research, and all that, but it doesn't feel like there is anything reliable at this point. Yes but exponential processes can do funny things, a week before uploading becomes possible it will still seem to be a very long way away, and the era where it's possible but very difficult and expensive will only last for about 15 minutes. And if Cryonics works (a big if I admit) then it doesn't matter if it happens a week after your death or a thousand years after, all the time you spent bathing in liquid nitrogen will seem instantaneous to you. "Uploading" isn't some well defined process (except in SciFi). You could be "uploaded" today by having a team of people research your appearance, personality, thinking, preferences, speech, etc. and incorporating them into a computer program with sensory inputs and some Watson like AI. It would produce a Max Headroom like John Clark who would continue to berate Bruno for his use of pronouns and other signs of intelligence. Would it be conscious?...who knows. Would it be recognizably John Clark...sure. Good point. With computationalism there is no zombies, but infinitely many local zombies. In fact if consciousness, which is a first person notion, depends entirely on the FPI, and thus on the infinity of computations, as it seems to be the case, then the UD generates *only* zombies, despite from our personal perspective there is no zombie for the entity which is counterfactually correct with respect to "me". Now I am not sure if consciousness per se relies that much on the FPI, as our brain seems classical. That depends also if the filter (Galois connection) is correct. Being conscious more than two instants does rely on the FPI, though, making physics into a computation measure calculus. Note that (comp + ~ MW => solipsisme), so MW is quite welcome with comp, it illustrates the first person plurality. The physical bottom is linear, as I hope this will be extracted in the "material" machine's pov, but there is a lot of work to do to get at that stage. Bruno Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Could we live forever?
On 17 Sep 2015, at 02:35, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote: Probably better to ask if immortal uploads would spend their times living in underground computer network facilities for ages, or would they roam the galaxy, searching for biology? The irony is that if you have the cognitive ability to conceive that you can survive qua "yes doctor", then you have the cognitive ability to understand that you are immortal no matter what. The illusion is "mortality" and "identity": you need a complex machine to support that illusion. That should be already clear in QM without collapse (+ reasonable "hamiltonian"), but it is unavoidable, if you believe in computationalism, and this that prime numbers are infinite, with or without your presence here (in that case you have to admit the existence of all computations and our indetermination on them). Technological immortality is only the pursue of evolution, and might be just a way to prolongate the Samsara, which is normal if your motivation is in seeing the next soccer cup, or the grow of your grand- grand...grand children. Yet, by doing that you avoid the "natural", arithmetical immortality which might be a not so easy path given the way numbers can surprise themselves, especially in the limit. People should be able to do what they want to do, as long as it doesn't prevent others to do what they want. To die is the most religious or spiritual act you can ever do, and the others have not much business to interfere, unless you ask for. I am glad that California voted recently a law making it possible to die with dignity through some medical assistance. Bruno Sent from AOL Mobile Mail -Original Message- From: John ClarkTo: everything-list Sent: Wed, Sep 16, 2015 01:27 PM Subject: Re: Could we live forever? On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 Brent Meeker wrote: > Without a built-in biological life span, people may become extremely timid and risk averse. If you knew you were immortal why on earth would you be risk averse? And if the death of death causes social problems then we'll just have to deal with those problems, I mean it wouldn't be the first time we experienced social problems. > "The older you get, the less you have to lose." And yet in practice people behave as if it's just the opposite. Young healthy people feel immortal and so they take lots of risks, but old people are full of aches and pains that constantly remind them that they are not immortal and so they become very timid and risk adverse. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Could we live forever?
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 Bruno Marchalwrote: > > The irony is that if you have the cognitive ability to conceive that you > can survive qua "yes doctor", then you have the cognitive ability to > understand that you are immortal no matter what. > So if you can conceive of something (although not in any detail) non physical making a calculation then it doesn't matter that nothing non physical can make a calculation; and thus there is no reason you can't start a successful computer hardware company with zero manufacturing costs. Sort of reminds me of those silly ontological "proofs" about the existence of God, if you can conceive of God (although not in any detail) then God must exist. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Cryonics in the NYT
Samiya,* "forever"* is NOT a timespan, it is the *infinite* (maybe without an end, or without a beginning?) so your 'to live forever' may mean: IT IS OVER WITHIN THE INSTANT IT STARTED. (Or: it may indeed mean a duration without an end, as you suggest). THE 'HARD WIRED WITHIN' is natural in an environment of many many generations educated into a belief system from all around. The content may come from Mummy's eary fairy tales for the baby - and completed by studies later on from 'smart' books and 'smart' teachers galore. None has a reasonable evidencing base. JM On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Samiya Illiaswrote: > Is the 'belief in an afterlife' natural? Perhaps it's something hard wired > within, such that even atheists hope to live forever! > > Samiya > > On 13-Sep-2015, at 11:26 pm, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: > > Neuroscience as a new messiah. People's belief in an afterlife will never > go away. Especially in our enlightenment age. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.