[Evolution] Solaris
After updating to the latest evolution now when I try to start red-carpet I get a _libc_register_forkhandler: referenced symbol not found Any idea what is wrong? Julia Solaris 8 UltraSparc -- [ Julia Anne Case ] [Ships are safe inside the harbor, ] [Programmer at large] [ but is that what ships are really for.] [ Admining Linux ] [ To thine own self be true. ] [ Windows/WindowsNT ] [ Fair is where you take your cows to be judged. ] msg03936/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[Evolution] multilingual support
Hi, first congratulations for Version 1.0! However, I still find multilingual support in evolution unsatisfactory, which wouldn't be astonishing for older applications, but definitely doesn't fit to a potential killer app like evolution (at least compared to mozilla and star office 6.0). If I want to read (and of course write) Japanese mails I have to restart evolution with Japanese locale! Just selecting the correct codeset doesn't even show Japanese correctly. If I then want to write a mail in German (with umlauts) or sync my palm (with German OS) I again have to restart evolution. Is this a bug or a feature? I hope the first and not the latter. And I strongly hope that it is not a problem of the underlying concept. Gerhard Schuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] No more macros in CVS?
If I'm using the evolution-1-0-branch, I presume I should be using the below branch of gal? If so, is this documented anywhere? The README file says nothing about it. It is also out-of-date regarding gtkhtml. Dan On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 20:02, Christopher James Lahey wrote: > On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 08:19, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > On the main CVS server this is fixed, so you may need to wait for > > anoncvs to update. In the meanwhile, just copy the macros directory from > > other CVS module. > > Alternatively, for gal at least, the branch (gal-evolution-1-0-branch) > still has the macros directory, so if in gal you > > cvs update -dP -r gal-evolution-1-0-branch > > You'll get a working dir. > > Thanks, >Chris > > > ___ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 18:14, Dan Winship wrote: > > I see that you are talking about only Exchange 2000. Any chance that > > there will be back-porting to the Exchange 5.5 platform, for those of us > > in a situation where we can't get upgraded to 2000 in a short timeframe? > > As mentioned in the press release, we will be releasing a connector for > 5.5 later on. I think it says "the first half of 2002" but I wouldn't > swear to that. Thanks Dan. Sorry for not reading it closely enough. Mike Strock [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?
> I see that you are talking about only Exchange 2000. Any chance that > there will be back-porting to the Exchange 5.5 platform, for those of us > in a situation where we can't get upgraded to 2000 in a short timeframe? As mentioned in the press release, we will be releasing a connector for 5.5 later on. I think it says "the first half of 2002" but I wouldn't swear to that. -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 19:08, Nat Friedman wrote: > On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 19:09, Stephen Witkop wrote: > > The only problem that I have with this is the timing. Ximian Connector > > has obviously been planned for some time, so why wasn't it laid out > > along with all the other plans for evolution. It just makes it seem as > > though Ximian was afraid they would lose support among developers and > > users so they didn't announce anything until they had what they wanted. > > I'm not saying that's what they were actually doing but that's certainly > > the way it seems. > > I can see how it might seem that way. A big component of the timing was > not wanting to announce it before we could start demoing it and giving > out evaluation copies to potential customers. We weren't trying to > trick anyone, but we didn't want to announce it and then ask people who > wanted to buy it to wait 6 months before they could see a demo :-). I see that you are talking about only Exchange 2000. Any chance that there will be back-porting to the Exchange 5.5 platform, for those of us in a situation where we can't get upgraded to 2000 in a short timeframe? Just curious. Mike Strock [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 19:08, Nat Friedman wrote: > On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 19:09, Stephen Witkop wrote: > > The only problem that I have with this is the timing. Ximian Connector > > has obviously been planned for some time, so why wasn't it laid out > > along with all the other plans for evolution. It just makes it seem as > > though Ximian was afraid they would lose support among developers and > > users so they didn't announce anything until they had what they wanted. > > I'm not saying that's what they were actually doing but that's certainly > > the way it seems. > > I can see how it might seem that way. A big component of the timing was > not wanting to announce it before we could start demoing it and giving > out evaluation copies to potential customers. We weren't trying to > trick anyone, but we didn't want to announce it and then ask people who > wanted to buy it to wait 6 months before they could see a demo :-). > > Best, > > Nat > I would agree with that. Ximian is a company that that needs to into consideration such non-trivial details like revenue and saleable products. Regarding the timing of the Connector announcement, I have no problems with it. I am rather tired of hearing about great products, commercial or open-source, eagerly bite my nails for 6-12 months, and end up being disappointed with the thing when it finally does arrive. Evolution is one of the best pieces of software I have seen on any platform, and I am an ex-die-hard Mac user who has seen some awesome applications. True, I still have some problems with Evolution (I still can't get spell-checking to work), and some speed issues could be improved, but the fact that Ximian put in all this work under GPL is awesome. In that spirit, I would volunteer for evaluating the Connector. We don't have an Exchange server yet, but the beast is coming in the next few weeks, and I was getting worried about the calendaring issue. Ujwal ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 22:08, Nat Friedman wrote: > On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 19:09, Stephen Witkop wrote: > > The only problem that I have with this is the timing. Ximian Connector > > has obviously been planned for some time, so why wasn't it laid out > > along with all the other plans for evolution. It just makes it seem as > > though Ximian was afraid they would lose support among developers and > > users so they didn't announce anything until they had what they wanted. > > I'm not saying that's what they were actually doing but that's certainly > > the way it seems. > > I can see how it might seem that way. A big component of the timing was > not wanting to announce it before we could start demoing it and giving > out evaluation copies to potential customers. We weren't trying to > trick anyone, but we didn't want to announce it and then ask people who > wanted to buy it to wait 6 months before they could see a demo :-). > Thanks for the explanation Nat, being open and not taking comments like mine as flames goes a long ways since they were only made out of concern for Ximian's long term success. Stephen ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 20:25, Brian wrote: > *isn't* it. If people find their making proprietary software > "distasteful" then they should ante up and buy either their standard or > professional edition of Ximian Gnome (I plan on doing it once 1.0 is on > the CD that I'm buying). If you order now, a CD with 1.0 will ship to you on the 14th. Nat ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 19:09, Stephen Witkop wrote: > The only problem that I have with this is the timing. Ximian Connector > has obviously been planned for some time, so why wasn't it laid out > along with all the other plans for evolution. It just makes it seem as > though Ximian was afraid they would lose support among developers and > users so they didn't announce anything until they had what they wanted. > I'm not saying that's what they were actually doing but that's certainly > the way it seems. I can see how it might seem that way. A big component of the timing was not wanting to announce it before we could start demoing it and giving out evaluation copies to potential customers. We weren't trying to trick anyone, but we didn't want to announce it and then ask people who wanted to buy it to wait 6 months before they could see a demo :-). Best, Nat ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?
Just to clarify my feelings on this matter, I am a big supporter of Ximian and of making money. That's why I am so concerned about Ximian's image. They are the poster child for open source companies looking to make a living by both creating software and at the same time supporting the open source community. I am very aware of what happened to Eazel and I don't want to see anything negative happen to Ximian. >From the beginning I have planned on buying copies of the software that Ximian has helped develop for all of us just as I have with Suse and Redhat and I will continue to support open source companies in the future. Stephen P.S. Debian is on my short list of software to buy on CD next. On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 20:25, Brian wrote: > On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 19:09, Stephen Witkop wrote: > > The only problem that I have with this is the timing. Ximian Connector > > has obviously been planned for some time, so why wasn't it laid out > > along with all the other plans for evolution. It just makes it seem as > > though Ximian was afraid they would lose support among developers and > > users so they didn't announce anything until they had what they wanted. > > I'm not saying that's what they were actually doing but that's certainly > > the way it seems. > > *DISCLAIMER*: Don't take this personally, Stephen, as I'm not aiming > this square at you. This is a general rant. > > > So what if they did make a proprietary plug-in and had it planned all > along? They've given us a great mailer that's completely standards > compliant and 100% free! I consider myself just as much of a GPL/FSF > supporting guy but jeez ... do I feel betrayed by Ximian because they > didn't clue me in about a plug-in that is of no use to me anyway? In a > word: NO! They have to make money somehow and giving away software > *isn't* it. If people find their making proprietary software > "distasteful" then they should ante up and buy either their standard or > professional edition of Ximian Gnome (I plan on doing it once 1.0 is on > the CD that I'm buying). Why is the Linux community filled with folks > who find simple economics distasteful?? I myself have watched with > baited breath ... hoping Ximian wouldn't go the way of Eazel once its > product hit 1.0. Ximian's been a software company whose primary > products were stuffed monkeys and t-shirts until recently. How can we, > the community, leech the efforts that they're funding and then complain > when they attempt to support themselves? > > They are a business, they must sell software to stay in business. Their > proprietary plug-in is of use to those who already languish in a closed > source environment. This has no bearing on those of us who use/support > open standards. When it does, then I'll bitch! > > > B > > > ___ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] still problem with evolution
> > > > I'm trying to backtrace what could possible cause this problem. Any help? > > > > Ah yes I'm using Red Hat 6.2 > > When Evolution appears to hang, have you looked at the output of 'top' > or 'gtop'? I used to have a problem where the evolution-addressbook > process would spin-lock (peg the processor). TMK, this was taken care > of, haven't had the problem on any of my systems recently. > > Jamin W. Collins Nope nothing in "top" Another thing that I discovered is that I can click on a Contact and then do "Forward Contact". However I can't create a new mail or forward mail. This is getting weirder. -- Victor Hadianto --- An idealist is one who helps the other fellow to make a profit. -- Henry Ford ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Openmail?
> When the real standards for the protocols that are needed for groupware > are done will ximian create a "connector" for that?? Will that be GPLed? Not a "connector". It will just be part of Evolution. (The protocol in question is called CAP [Calendar Access Protocol], btw.) > Will ximian be interested in creating a GPLed server for that?? I don't know. Well, I mean, yeah, we'd be interested, but I don't know if we'd actually get around to doing it. :) -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Problem sending mail
All, I have Linux RedHat 7.1, with the latest rev of Evolution. It has one nic, with an IP of 192.168.0.2, and a nameserver of 192.168.0.1. The .0.1 box is a Windoze machine with Internet Connection Sharing enabled. Everything works fine, as far as web access goes, on my Linux box with the exception of sending email. Everytime I try and send email, I get a 'RCPT TO response error', no matter what SMTP server I use. On my Windoze box, I can easily send mail with my Outlook client using the same SMTP servers. I am looking for suggestions on how to debug this, as I am not sure if it is a Windoze artifact, or that there is something wrong with Evolution or my Linux setup. By the way, I can receive mail with Evolution no problem. Andrew Thiessen ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Openmail?
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 20:09, Mark Neill wrote: > On 6 Dec 2001, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote: > > Isnt openmail a drop in replacement for exchange, by drop in I mean > > outlook just works with it? If so then surely the connector ximian are > > building will also just work. > > Openmail's selling point was that it was drop-in compatible with Exchange. > We considered suggesting a migration to it at one company I worked for. > > If Evo can talk to Exchange, it should be able to talk to Openmail. My understanding is that it is "drop-in compatible" in a marketing sense, not a technical sense. I don't remember the details. (Someone else suggested you needed an Outlook plugin on each client, and that might be it.) -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Openmail?
On 6 Dec 2001, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote: > Isnt openmail a drop in replacement for exchange, by drop in I mean > outlook just works with it? If so then surely the connector ximian are > building will also just work. Openmail's selling point was that it was drop-in compatible with Exchange. We considered suggesting a migration to it at one company I worked for. If Evo can talk to Exchange, it should be able to talk to Openmail. --Mark ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Strange bug in v1.0
For what it's worth - I can reproduce the bug using your steps. Evo 1.0 on RH 7.1 On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 03:09:13PM -0500, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > I'm wondering whether anyone else is able to duplicate the Evolution bug > I've now managed to dupe on two systems. > > Totally reproducible for me too. See #16676 on the Bugzilla. Larry, > Radek, please have a look, this is pretty bad. :-) > > I *tried* to create my first HTML email this morning as I needed to > create a simple 2 column table and didn't want to have to attach a word > document. > > I got all the table created, but before I sent the email I decided to > embolden the first row. I selected the text in the first row of the > table, right to left (i.e., started at end of second cell to the start > of the first cell) then selected Format->Style->Bold. > > The entire content part of the email disappeared! > > I tried various attempts at resizing the window, minimizing or rolling > up the window and restoring but nothing brought it back. I tried to save > it as a draft, which crashed Evolution's mail shell. > > I tried to create a table tonight on my home system rather than my work > machine and trying to make the header row bold again also killed the > mail window, losing the content. > > Can anyone else duplicate this to the point that it can be declared a > bug? > > -- > Ettore -- Dan Berger [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] http://home.ix.netcom.com/~dberger Inter arma silent leges "Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding." Justice Louis Brandeis, dissenting, Olmstead v US (1928) A982 E6B1 CB2F 7A49 843A 9297 DA73 4371 1F54 8D0C msg04427/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] LDAP
I have not been able to do this. I have tried and tried, but nothing works. I ended up creating a contact under "Other Contacts" then I did a search for " "(just a space), and then did ctrl-a and coppied them all to "Local Folders->Contacts"(drag and drop). It also seems that I'm only able to display 100 names as well, but when using openldap, I can see more than that. Not sure if that's a bug or what. Either way, I'm happy with Evo being so nice and all, but disappointed that I don't have the following: 1. right click on any folder and have a "Mark all as read" in the folder flyout. 2. Address book sources not working correctly. So if I say that my only contact under "Other Contacts" is the primary adressbook source, then it will perform lookups on that BEFORE my "Local Folders->Contacts". 3. More responsiveness from my timed checks for new mail. It checks, and I may not see that mail is there for several minutes, unless I'm watching my imap source constantly. (highlighted inbox all the time). Other than that it's ok. The "mail" component does crash constantly though,(only at work, never at home), and it seems to be related to auto-checking for new mail.(I've timed it) On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 18:57, Bob Hastings wrote: > Is there anyone out there who has successfully gotten Evo to perform an > LDAP lookup against an Exchange 5.5 server? Ximians bugzilla says that > this has been long since fixed but I've never been able to get it to > work. I've tried several other LDAP clients in addition to Outlook > Express and they all work fine. But Evo is a no-go. Kinda sucks not > being able to look at that Global Address List... > > > > > > > ___ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Have regard for your name, since it will remain for you longer than a great store of gold." Ecclesiastes, Aprocrypha msg03925/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] Openmail?
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 22:59, Dan Winship wrote: > And we're not interested in adding support for proprietary protocols to > Evolution itself (the free, core product); we'd rather perfect the > support for open protocols. > When the real standards for the protocols that are needed for groupware are done will ximian create a "connector" for that?? Will that be GPLed? Will ximian be interested in creating a GPLed server for that?? Just curious! /Erik -- Erik Bågfors | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Supporter of free software | GSM +46 733 279 273 fingerprint: A85B 95D3 D26B 296B 6C60 4F32 2C0B 693D 6E32 ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Openmail?
I think you still need to install a driver on each client computer you want to use with OpenMail. On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 14:14, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote: > On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 07:50, Ian A. Marsman wrote: > > I know this is early to be asking about this, but Samsung has bought the > > rights to use, maintain, and enhance Openmail. Is it foreseeable that > > Ximian might plan to build an Openmail connector? This would allow > > Isnt openmail a drop in replacement for exchange, by drop in I mean > outlook just works with it? If so then surely the connector ximian are > building will also just work. > > > > Rob Brown-Bayliss > ---==o==--- -- Ian A. Marsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Openmail?
On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 07:50, Ian A. Marsman wrote: > I know this is early to be asking about this, but Samsung has bought the > rights to use, maintain, and enhance Openmail. Is it foreseeable that > Ximian might plan to build an Openmail connector? This would allow Isnt openmail a drop in replacement for exchange, by drop in I mean outlook just works with it? If so then surely the connector ximian are building will also just work. Rob Brown-Bayliss ---==o==--- ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Re: configure with kerb problems
does anyone have any idea what i can do with this? i don't really
understand why the configure script is doing the test that it is doing.
it makes sense as to why it fails, but how is it not supposed to fail?
Thanks,
Arren Mund
>
> On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 09:27, Arren Mund wrote:
> > i am still getting the same error:
> >
> > configure:11251: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -Wall -Wunused
> > -I/usr/local/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/local/lib/glib/include
> > -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -L/usr/local/krb4/lib
> > -L/usr/local/ssl/lib -lkrb4 -lcrypto -lcom_err -lroken conftest.c
1>&5
> > /tmp/cc1b2eUx.o: In function `main':
> > /tmp/evolution-1.0/configure:11247: undefined reference to
`krb_mk_req'
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > configure: failed program was:
> > #line 11240 "configure"
> > #include "confdefs.h"
> > /* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */
> > /* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2
> > builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply. */
> > char krb_mk_req();
> >
> > int main() {
> > krb_mk_req()
> > ; return 0; }
> >
> > i installed that krb4 into /usr/local/krb4 and put
/usr/local/krb4/lib
> > at the top of my ld.so.conf and ran ldconfig and used this to
configure:
> > ./configure --with-db3=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.1/
> > --with-krb4=/usr/local/krb4
> >
> > can anyone help?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Arren Mund
> >
> > On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 02:03, Niklas Jakobsson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 07:53, Arren Mund wrote:
> > > > here's what i run when i do the configure:
> > > >
> > > > ./configure --with-db3=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.1/
> > > > --with-krb4=/usr/heimdal/
> > > >
> > > Heimdal is kerberos 5 not kerberos 4, pick up the the KTH kerberos
4
> > > implementation at http://www.pdc.kth.se/kth-krb/
> > >
> > > /Nico
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> >
>
>
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] still problem with evolution
Hi there, I suppose I'm trying to understand (and getting some help would be nice) why my evolution-mail refuse to work. I upgraded to 1.0 via Red-carpet. Nice new splash screen, everything looks find BUT I can't create a new email/forward email. Everytime i want to do something to compose a new email/forward Evolution just hangs quietly. I'm trying to backtrace what could possible cause this problem. Any help? Ah yes I'm using Red Hat 6.2 -- Victor Hadianto --- Nothing is so firmly believed as that which we least know. -- Michel de Montaigne ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Openmail?
> > I know this is early to be asking about this, but Samsung has bought the > > rights to use, maintain, and enhance Openmail. Is it foreseeable that > > Ximian might plan to build an Openmail connector? > Then someone else jumps in and asks about GroupWise? Any other > proprietary interfaces? Obviously we're only going to write additional proprietary connectors if there's enough market for them that we'd make "lots of money" selling them. (I have no idea what the threshold on "lots of money" would be, but note that it does have to be "lots", because if we were only going to make "a little bit of money", it would presumably make more sense to have the hackers work on something more profitable instead.) Oh, or if some company paid us "lots of money" to write such a connector, we might, even if no one else wanted it, I guess. And we're not interested in adding support for proprietary protocols to Evolution itself (the free, core product); we'd rather perfect the support for open protocols. I don't know a whole lot about proprietary groupware server market share beyond the fact that Microsoft and Lotus have almost all of it. So, at the present time, Openmail and GroupWise connectors don't look likely. Unless you happen to have $1M lying around. :-) OTOH, if Samsung goes all out on Openmail and it becomes the next big thing, then maybe it could happen. -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?
> How Ximian is percieved is very important to the open source community. > If they fail then noone will put up capital to help open source > companies get going and if they alienate the community by doing things > in ways the seem deceptive they will fail and we will all lose. Good point, My first thought was why had I not heard of it, but then I guessed I missed it as I seldom view the ximian website and teend to skim my lists, offten ignoring announcemts that sound like they are not for me (I use pop mail, work form home and expect to stay that way till I retire, hopefully next year, but more likely not) But, lets all take a deep breath, Ximian is at heart a young company, founded by young folks like us, staffed mostly by young people, it all adds up to a lot of energy and little experience. I rememebr some of teh early ximian staff posts to teh evolution list were a bit high handed (you guys listen to us type mails) but they have settled down nicely... I feel like Ximian are here for teh long haul, and that there was no intentinal deception, and the fact that it looks like there might have been probably means that next time there wont be... Live and learn. And I love evolution, it is so needed! -- Rob Brown-Bayliss ---==o==--- ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Printer settings
You should try setting the PRINTER environment variable to "myPrinter" in your .bashrc or similar. Then you can simply call lpr to print directly to your selected printer. --- "David G. Simmons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a minor frustration...my print command is > 'lpr -PmyPrinter' yet > Evolution insists every time that I try to print > that I type in the > '-PmyPrinter' portion, as it only seems to remember > the lpr part. Any > place I can set my default printer selection in > Evolution? or do I just > keep typing this in every time I go to print > something? > > Thanks! > > dg > -- > -- > "It doesn't look to *me* like you're doing anything > so important." > -Susie Derkins > auto-generated by the Calvinator(TM) > -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > mQGiBDwCetMRBAC2Nxqh5qCANGGyGWyZ4Idc8nCd+pJge8dPR947KgU6yO4y6I0B > 0IuWkG6gKk7T0RO+NnCQpKfLYa5kXAfmpqBclP/JZg0iTieCk4pV5z5CiQQLqYJz > l4VnczC87HwxCrjIqHmyqCOZi1r5gr2n6bJZ7i1Fyr7PswDeUGLwqVOQ2wCgmb1r > T4txrtFldzu97LpwMUvbMmUEAJI4MticjxxonOMFURxV4hTlHE1KzrnsIEs7X8zG > ITiV8KIqwO2hktncwRxv0MyogJtyILd76a0wiDgthkCapKFpMwbpp7OxesJjf4G7 > TgIArJoGoghrX1zNzpoLI53NEYHo/4zT0Pqqo0vDpq3auJzawGHZSOLeCbVHND9G > 1G+MA/9nL/x7qtxnzoy0teWQ4bKewvRagZz2fIKIOJUkBa93rFEvvjftzb2pYzpy > DUuf4DDcDNkrnaRrXWylXPbIbc+8nc5ySxMC3M/I7v2tAGP+aovnzCrjf8W6OJa7 > B6x4F4Qk06OubP5mEKl9W+tGshLfg509PVbKjJdc6QUayxQOI7RBRGF2aWQgRy4g > U2ltbW9ucyAoTXkgSG9tZSBQR1ApIDxkYXZpZC5zaW1tb25zQHNpbW1vbnMtZmFt > aWx5Lm9yZz6IVwQTEQIAFwUCPAJ60wULBwoDBAMVAwIDFgIBAheAAAoJEJiHxI7k > j+R6skAAn2JqWHLvnObhj7TUKwnwQCq+xnRaAJsFC3+shl80cybPwx5+yfa2iq0b > /bkBDQQ8AnrZEAQAv0AoEHEZRoUORY5BbGjZbSkeMts0HHsyRXVJEXFSBDOCzexk > fmg6X9CLJlk2bWyKSPCA4ogQJezRKQt9Nv7IHIZrWJ6rZtjUeXShvD2+pD5J9Vo0 > 9ReoH3nLHnDGT0vqbZb4xkNsbTIE3Rm97Kdvjz9W5res2U8h5nHyqcV4HzcABAsE > ALR+PFfyLizMHSjtPWNvYFidGmTqPFl2eiL0OfT2slbnV0duO2q80BzbihUjdO0P > 3QTOnxXpDo2ql80HoWau7sO6U9x59MpR4/HiSycA0XGlqmvJrBj0yVqB4+QLhZ3d > yhBG3HipOpJCdRdr0IFz7dcv98W38JOC/KM04qqVrFNGiEYEGBECAAYFAjwCetkA > CgkQmIfEjuSP5HrExACgljsudMMYtSHrEj23ZzEliel7RrUAniFatRr5QR+CycvB > JSaDz8LwvEAs > =I1ld > -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Printer settings
You can set the PRINTER environment variable and lpr will use that as its default printer. See if that works. Juan On 5 Dec 2001, David G. Simmons wrote: > Date: 05 Dec 2001 12:11:33 -0800 > From: David G. Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Evolution] Printer settings > > > I have a minor frustration...my print command is 'lpr -PmyPrinter' yet > Evolution insists every time that I try to print that I type in the > '-PmyPrinter' portion, as it only seems to remember the lpr part. Any > place I can set my default printer selection in Evolution? or do I just > keep typing this in every time I go to print something? > > Thanks! > > dg > -- > -- > "It doesn't look to *me* like you're doing anything so important." > -Susie Derkins > auto-generated by the Calvinator(TM) > -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > mQGiBDwCetMRBAC2Nxqh5qCANGGyGWyZ4Idc8nCd+pJge8dPR947KgU6yO4y6I0B > 0IuWkG6gKk7T0RO+NnCQpKfLYa5kXAfmpqBclP/JZg0iTieCk4pV5z5CiQQLqYJz > l4VnczC87HwxCrjIqHmyqCOZi1r5gr2n6bJZ7i1Fyr7PswDeUGLwqVOQ2wCgmb1r > T4txrtFldzu97LpwMUvbMmUEAJI4MticjxxonOMFURxV4hTlHE1KzrnsIEs7X8zG > ITiV8KIqwO2hktncwRxv0MyogJtyILd76a0wiDgthkCapKFpMwbpp7OxesJjf4G7 > TgIArJoGoghrX1zNzpoLI53NEYHo/4zT0Pqqo0vDpq3auJzawGHZSOLeCbVHND9G > 1G+MA/9nL/x7qtxnzoy0teWQ4bKewvRagZz2fIKIOJUkBa93rFEvvjftzb2pYzpy > DUuf4DDcDNkrnaRrXWylXPbIbc+8nc5ySxMC3M/I7v2tAGP+aovnzCrjf8W6OJa7 > B6x4F4Qk06OubP5mEKl9W+tGshLfg509PVbKjJdc6QUayxQOI7RBRGF2aWQgRy4g > U2ltbW9ucyAoTXkgSG9tZSBQR1ApIDxkYXZpZC5zaW1tb25zQHNpbW1vbnMtZmFt > aWx5Lm9yZz6IVwQTEQIAFwUCPAJ60wULBwoDBAMVAwIDFgIBAheAAAoJEJiHxI7k > j+R6skAAn2JqWHLvnObhj7TUKwnwQCq+xnRaAJsFC3+shl80cybPwx5+yfa2iq0b > /bkBDQQ8AnrZEAQAv0AoEHEZRoUORY5BbGjZbSkeMts0HHsyRXVJEXFSBDOCzexk > fmg6X9CLJlk2bWyKSPCA4ogQJezRKQt9Nv7IHIZrWJ6rZtjUeXShvD2+pD5J9Vo0 > 9ReoH3nLHnDGT0vqbZb4xkNsbTIE3Rm97Kdvjz9W5res2U8h5nHyqcV4HzcABAsE > ALR+PFfyLizMHSjtPWNvYFidGmTqPFl2eiL0OfT2slbnV0duO2q80BzbihUjdO0P > 3QTOnxXpDo2ql80HoWau7sO6U9x59MpR4/HiSycA0XGlqmvJrBj0yVqB4+QLhZ3d > yhBG3HipOpJCdRdr0IFz7dcv98W38JOC/KM04qqVrFNGiEYEGBECAAYFAjwCetkA > CgkQmIfEjuSP5HrExACgljsudMMYtSHrEj23ZzEliel7RrUAniFatRr5QR+CycvB > JSaDz8LwvEAs > =I1ld > -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- > ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Openmail?
Then someone else jumps in and asks about GroupWise? Any other proprietary interfaces? Thanks, john On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 13:50, Ian A. Marsman wrote: > I know this is early to be asking about this, but Samsung has bought the > rights to use, maintain, and enhance Openmail. Is it foreseeable that > Ximian might plan to build an Openmail connector? This would allow > calendaring and contact support for both Outlook and Evolution clients > and the avoidance of Exchange. Through HP I believe the licensing costs > of Openmail were much nicer than Exchange as well. > > -- > Ian A. Marsman > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ___ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Can't Initialize Evolution
Hmmm. I suppose it is possible -- here's what wombat tells me: # wombat --version wombat-Message: Starting wombat Gnome wombat 1.0 # Thanks, Gil On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 15:00, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > It looks like it's up-to-date. Also note that the error you received is > different from the one I'm currently receiving (GeneralError vs. > InterfaceNotFound). > > Is it possible that you have an old version of the Wombat floating > around? > > -- > Ettore ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Openmail?
I know this is early to be asking about this, but Samsung has bought the rights to use, maintain, and enhance Openmail. Is it foreseeable that Ximian might plan to build an Openmail connector? This would allow calendaring and contact support for both Outlook and Evolution clients and the avoidance of Exchange. Through HP I believe the licensing costs of Openmail were much nicer than Exchange as well. -- Ian A. Marsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Ignoring changes with empty subject
I find the following 1.0 behavior to be a UI bug: compose an email to someone (like yourself) leave the subject empty write "foo" in the body hit send. You'll get the "empty subject" dialog. erase "foo" in the body and type "bar" instead. Hit the send anyway button in the warning dialog. When you recieve the email, the message body will be "foo" Shall I enter this one into bugzilla? --Ben PS You folks at Ximian rock. Evolution is great. I've opened sevaral bug reports since 1.0, but overall it's a great piece of software! ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] using local mailbox format with Evo
Hi, This question refers to a moan I have about Evolution. What I would like it to do (which pine can very easily) is to be able to read my mail as it comes in rather than waiting for evo to download the whole lot (sometimes 500 msg's a night), then remove from the server and then read my mail. I'm using pop and SMTP for receiving/Sending. Ive tried specifying in my mail account on evo to use local mail delivery, but when I click send/receive a box flashes on the screen so quick I cannot read it ( I suspect it's tried to collect it and finished). Ive also tried setting it to: Standard Unix mbox spools (again its got the correct path: /var/spool/mail/mark), but this does the same. I can do the above in Pine (as Ive got a .fetchmailrc file). What would I have to set in Evo to do this? Thanks Mark -- A penguin a day keeps the fatal exceptions away... Registered Linux User: 208939 Licq: 119422259 ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Printer settings
I have a minor frustration...my print command is 'lpr -PmyPrinter' yet Evolution insists every time that I try to print that I type in the '-PmyPrinter' portion, as it only seems to remember the lpr part. Any place I can set my default printer selection in Evolution? or do I just keep typing this in every time I go to print something? Thanks! dg -- -- "It doesn't look to *me* like you're doing anything so important." -Susie Derkins auto-generated by the Calvinator(TM) -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org mQGiBDwCetMRBAC2Nxqh5qCANGGyGWyZ4Idc8nCd+pJge8dPR947KgU6yO4y6I0B 0IuWkG6gKk7T0RO+NnCQpKfLYa5kXAfmpqBclP/JZg0iTieCk4pV5z5CiQQLqYJz l4VnczC87HwxCrjIqHmyqCOZi1r5gr2n6bJZ7i1Fyr7PswDeUGLwqVOQ2wCgmb1r T4txrtFldzu97LpwMUvbMmUEAJI4MticjxxonOMFURxV4hTlHE1KzrnsIEs7X8zG ITiV8KIqwO2hktncwRxv0MyogJtyILd76a0wiDgthkCapKFpMwbpp7OxesJjf4G7 TgIArJoGoghrX1zNzpoLI53NEYHo/4zT0Pqqo0vDpq3auJzawGHZSOLeCbVHND9G 1G+MA/9nL/x7qtxnzoy0teWQ4bKewvRagZz2fIKIOJUkBa93rFEvvjftzb2pYzpy DUuf4DDcDNkrnaRrXWylXPbIbc+8nc5ySxMC3M/I7v2tAGP+aovnzCrjf8W6OJa7 B6x4F4Qk06OubP5mEKl9W+tGshLfg509PVbKjJdc6QUayxQOI7RBRGF2aWQgRy4g U2ltbW9ucyAoTXkgSG9tZSBQR1ApIDxkYXZpZC5zaW1tb25zQHNpbW1vbnMtZmFt aWx5Lm9yZz6IVwQTEQIAFwUCPAJ60wULBwoDBAMVAwIDFgIBAheAAAoJEJiHxI7k j+R6skAAn2JqWHLvnObhj7TUKwnwQCq+xnRaAJsFC3+shl80cybPwx5+yfa2iq0b /bkBDQQ8AnrZEAQAv0AoEHEZRoUORY5BbGjZbSkeMts0HHsyRXVJEXFSBDOCzexk fmg6X9CLJlk2bWyKSPCA4ogQJezRKQt9Nv7IHIZrWJ6rZtjUeXShvD2+pD5J9Vo0 9ReoH3nLHnDGT0vqbZb4xkNsbTIE3Rm97Kdvjz9W5res2U8h5nHyqcV4HzcABAsE ALR+PFfyLizMHSjtPWNvYFidGmTqPFl2eiL0OfT2slbnV0duO2q80BzbihUjdO0P 3QTOnxXpDo2ql80HoWau7sO6U9x59MpR4/HiSycA0XGlqmvJrBj0yVqB4+QLhZ3d yhBG3HipOpJCdRdr0IFz7dcv98W38JOC/KM04qqVrFNGiEYEGBECAAYFAjwCetkA CgkQmIfEjuSP5HrExACgljsudMMYtSHrEj23ZzEliel7RrUAniFatRr5QR+CycvB JSaDz8LwvEAs =I1ld -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- msg03912/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] Strange bug in v1.0
I'm wondering whether anyone else is able to duplicate the Evolution bug I've now managed to dupe on two systems. Totally reproducible for me too. See #16676 on the Bugzilla. Larry, Radek, please have a look, this is pretty bad. :-) I *tried* to create my first HTML email this morning as I needed to create a simple 2 column table and didn't want to have to attach a word document. I got all the table created, but before I sent the email I decided to embolden the first row. I selected the text in the first row of the table, right to left (i.e., started at end of second cell to the start of the first cell) then selected Format->Style->Bold. The entire content part of the email disappeared! I tried various attempts at resizing the window, minimizing or rolling up the window and restoring but nothing brought it back. I tried to save it as a draft, which crashed Evolution's mail shell. I tried to create a table tonight on my home system rather than my work machine and trying to make the header row bold again also killed the mail window, losing the content. Can anyone else duplicate this to the point that it can be declared a bug? -- Ettore
Re: [Evolution] No more macros in CVS?
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 08:19, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On the main CVS server this is fixed, so you may need to wait for > anoncvs to update. In the meanwhile, just copy the macros directory from > other CVS module. Alternatively, for gal at least, the branch (gal-evolution-1-0-branch) still has the macros directory, so if in gal you cvs update -dP -r gal-evolution-1-0-branch You'll get a working dir. Thanks, Chris ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Can't Initialize Evolution
It looks like it's up-to-date. Also note that the error you received is different from the one I'm currently receiving (GeneralError vs. InterfaceNotFound). Is it possible that you have an old version of the Wombat floating around? -- Ettore
Re: [Evolution] Still no Palm Pilot Notes conduit?
When searching some of the past threads I was under the impression that Evolution would have the Notes conduit for the Palm Pilot in the 1.0 Release. For me, it is the most useful function of my Palm Pilot, as I have hundreds of system administration notes in an easily accessible format. Currently Evolution doesn't have a Notes component so there is nothing to sync the Pilot with in the first place. :-) A Notes component is planned, though. In the meantime, you can just the standard GNOME Pilot syncing conduits to sync up your notes. -- Ettore
Re: [Evolution] bug in "next unread message" ?
yes. everytime when the very first message in a folder is unread and I start reading unread messages with a later one. (ah, maybe the reason is that my messages are sorted by date (descending) - e.e. newest messages first?) > I'm not seeing that behavior at the moment. Does this happen all the > time for you? > > --Ben > > On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 02:13, Stefan Palme wrote: > > > > hi all, > > > > maybe this is a bug, or I dont understand the behaviour... > > > > when I have a folder with read and unread mails (all visible), > > I can read one of the unread emails by clicking on it (of course). > > when I want to read the next unread message, I type "N". > > > > when I at first did not clicked on the first unread message, then > > search wraps around when typing "N" and the last unread message had > > been reached. > > > > the (maybe) wrong behaviour is the wrap-around: when the very first > > message in the folder is an unread message, the wrap-around does not > > work properly - it jumps to the SECOND unread message in the folder. > > to go to the first of these messages, I have to type "P". > > > > regards > > -stefan palme- > > > > -- > > - > > Dipl. Inf. (FH) Stefan Palme > > > > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > phon: +49 341 3910484 > > fax: +49 1212 517956219 > > - > > > > ___ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > -- Dipl. Inf. (FH) Stefan Palme email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phon: +49 341 3910484 fax: +49 1212 517956219 Key fingerprint = 1BA7 D217 36A1 534C A5AD F18A E2D1 488A E904 F9EC msg03909/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] play sound or execute command upon reception of new message?
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 09:45:24AM -0800, etienne sky wrote: > is there a way to play a sound or execute a command > when a new message is received (I have found no way > myself)? If not, could this feature be implemented > soon? It's in bugzilla, and I think I remember someone submitting a patch for it, soon after 1.0 went to feature freeze. Perhaps it could be applied? - ~C. -- $a="printf.net"; Chris Ball | chris@void.$a | www.$a | finger: chris@$a As to luck, there's the old miners' proverb: Gold is where you find it. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] play sound or execute command upon reception of new message?
Hi to all, is there a way to play a sound or execute a command when a new message is received (I have found no way myself)? If not, could this feature be implemented soon? Perhaps an option could be added to the filters to execute a command and my problem would be solved. Otherwise adding an option to the "Receiving Options" tab in the mail account settings would be good. Thanks a lot, Etienne __ Do You Yahoo!? Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping. http://shopping.yahoo.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] 1.0 Configuration incompatability help
On 5 Dec 2001, Ettore Perazzoli had this to say: >I just upgraded from RC2 to 1.0 and the executive summary crashes >immediately every time. By moving my old evolution directory out of the >way and starting fresh, the summary seems to fire up just fine. *But* I > > It would be useful to figure out what causes the crash first. Can you >please submit a stack trace into the Bugzilla and give us the bug >number? Done. Bug #16658. > Besides that, you should be able to re-create your mail folder set-up >by copying everything from ~/evolution/local, as well as >~/evolution/vfolders.xml and ~/evolution/filters.xml . Great. Thanks. Evolution looks promising... :-) -Don _ Donald A. Peterson | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph.D. Research Associate | Dept. of Chemistry | PH: (541) 737-7079 Oregon St. University| FAX: (541) 737-0480 - ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] bug in "next unread message" ?
I'm not seeing that behavior at the moment. Does this happen all the time for you? --Ben On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 02:13, Stefan Palme wrote: > > hi all, > > maybe this is a bug, or I dont understand the behaviour... > > when I have a folder with read and unread mails (all visible), > I can read one of the unread emails by clicking on it (of course). > when I want to read the next unread message, I type "N". > > when I at first did not clicked on the first unread message, then > search wraps around when typing "N" and the last unread message had > been reached. > > the (maybe) wrong behaviour is the wrap-around: when the very first > message in the folder is an unread message, the wrap-around does not > work properly - it jumps to the SECOND unread message in the folder. > to go to the first of these messages, I have to type "P". > > regards > -stefan palme- > > -- > - > Dipl. Inf. (FH) Stefan Palme > > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > phon: +49 341 3910484 > fax: +49 1212 517956219 > - ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] 1.0 Configuration incompatability help
I just upgraded from RC2 to 1.0 and the executive summary crashes immediately every time. By moving my old evolution directory out of the way and starting fresh, the summary seems to fire up just fine. *But* I would rather not go through the hassle of re-creating ALL of my SPAM/Maiing list/family folders/filters/rules. Can someone point out the relevant section of what file from the original config to change so I can use my old tree? Or, just tell me what files/directories need to be copied over for that to work. It would be useful to figure out what causes the crash first. Can you please submit a stack trace into the Bugzilla and give us the bug number? Besides that, you should be able to re-create your mail folder set-up by copying everything from ~/evolution/local, as well as ~/evolution/vfolders.xml and ~/evolution/filters.xml . -- Ettore
Re: [Evolution] LDAP
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 14:55, Dwight Hubbard wrote: > That posting is a bit light on content to be put in the FAQ. I couldn't > get it working and I find the post leaves me more than a little puzzled > as to exactly what goes in the authentication fields, search_base and > search scope. It would also help if it showed some way of getting the > information that goes into those fields. I've managed to get this mostly working, but it seems a little like a black art :-) For me, I needed to do the following:- - go to contacts - select menu item Tools->Addressbook Sources - Add a entry - Basic tab - Account name is what you want to appear "Other Contacts" section of the folder bar - Server name - name or ip address of your LDAP/exchange server - I did *not* check the "My server requires authentication" - Advanced tab - Port - unchanged (389) - Search base - o=Intechnology;c=GB - Search scope - Sub The only hard part is the Search base, for which o=Intechnology is my company name, and the c=GB is the fact that we are UK based. I got these by playing with ldapseach and by mugging our exchange administrator :-) After that you get a new entry in "Other Contacts", search and stuff basically works, although there is a (for us at least) a cap on numbers of records returned. The a-z entries on the right hand side of the contacts page do *not* work - a trace of whats being done shows they are quesrying for something that exchange knows nothing about. We use an exchange 5.5 server. Nigel. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] LDAP
Well... This is the official FAQ entry which covers configuring LDAP with Exchange. I'm curious if people think it needs more detail or even if it works correctly. :^) http://support.ximian.com/cgi-bin/ximian.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_refno=010716-03 On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 09:55, Dwight Hubbard wrote: > That posting is a bit light on content to be put in the FAQ. I couldn't > get it working and I find the post leaves me more than a little puzzled > as to exactly what goes in the authentication fields, search_base and > search scope. It would also help if it showed some way of getting the > information that goes into those fields. > > On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 03:52, James Ogley wrote: > > Yes, take a look at > > http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution/2001-October/013873.html > > > > Maybe this should be put in an FAQ? > > > ___ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] configure with kerb problems
i am still getting the same error:
configure:11251: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -Wall -Wunused
-I/usr/local/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/local/lib/glib/include
-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -L/usr/local/krb4/lib
-L/usr/local/ssl/lib -lkrb4 -lcrypto -lcom_err -lroken conftest.c 1>&5
/tmp/cc1b2eUx.o: In function `main':
/tmp/evolution-1.0/configure:11247: undefined reference to `krb_mk_req'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
configure: failed program was:
#line 11240 "configure"
#include "confdefs.h"
/* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */
/* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2
builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply. */
char krb_mk_req();
int main() {
krb_mk_req()
; return 0; }
i installed that krb4 into /usr/local/krb4 and put /usr/local/krb4/lib
at the top of my ld.so.conf and ran ldconfig and used this to configure:
./configure --with-db3=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.1/
--with-krb4=/usr/local/krb4
can anyone help?
Thanks,
Arren Mund
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 02:03, Niklas Jakobsson wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 07:53, Arren Mund wrote:
> > here's what i run when i do the configure:
> >
> > ./configure --with-db3=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.1/
> > --with-krb4=/usr/heimdal/
> >
> Heimdal is kerberos 5 not kerberos 4, pick up the the KTH kerberos 4
> implementation at http://www.pdc.kth.se/kth-krb/
>
> /Nico
>
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] LDAP
That posting is a bit light on content to be put in the FAQ. I couldn't get it working and I find the post leaves me more than a little puzzled as to exactly what goes in the authentication fields, search_base and search scope. It would also help if it showed some way of getting the information that goes into those fields. On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 03:52, James Ogley wrote: > Yes, take a look at > http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution/2001-October/013873.html > > Maybe this should be put in an FAQ? ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Still no Palm Pilot Notes conduit?
Hello! When searching some of the past threads I was under the impression that Evolution would have the Notes conduit for the Palm Pilot in the 1.0 Release. For me, it is the most useful function of my Palm Pilot, as I have hundreds of system administration notes in an easily accessible format. Are there any plans to incorporate the Notes conduit in future releases? Regards, Brandon ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Can't Initialize Evolution
Here's my mozilla package list: # rpm -q -a | grep moz mozilla-0.9.5-ximian.1 mozilla-psm-0.9.5-ximian.1 mozilla-xmlterm-0.9.5-ximian.1 mozilla-mail-0.9.5-ximian.1 It looks like it's up-to-date. Also note that the error you received is different from the one I'm currently receiving (GeneralError vs. InterfaceNotFound). Thanks anyway, Gil On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 22:18, Damon Chaplin wrote: > On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 11:21, Gil Hauer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I had the same problem (in fact, I've been having it for a while!) and > > noticed the same symptoms as Chris did. I forced a new install of > > libnspr4 and wombat sees all of it's shared libraries. > > > > However, when I start evolution I still get this application message in > > my shell: > > > > evolution-shell-WARNING **: Cannot access Bonobo/ConfigDatabase \ > > on wombat: (IDL: bonobo/Moniker/InterfaceNotFound:1.0) > > > > ... and a dialog window that says: > > > > Cannot Initialize the Ximian Evolution shell: Configuration \ > > Database not found > > > > This is using RedHat 7.2 with all the latest Ximian updates. > > > > killev; oaf-slay does not help the situation. Fresh reboot as well. > > > > Any ideas? Please? > > > > Thanks, Gil > > I just got this after upgrading a RedHat 7.0 system: > > wombat: relocation error: /usr/lib/libnspr4.so: undefined symbol: fstat > > evolution-shell-WARNING **: Cannot access Bonobo/ConfigDatabase on > wombat: (IDL:OAF/GeneralError:1.0) > > > I updated mozilla and Evolution now works. I think there is a dependency > problem with the mozilla libraries Evolution uses. > > Damon > > ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Re: Integrating Gaim in Evolution [adding jabber]
> Once the URL is in a true form, > and not a hack, I can hack Evo's contacts to support IM > identities--click to send an IM, or use the IM fields (AIM, Jabber, MSN) > to match the online list to the protocol to make the URL. Lots of > potential. Before doing too much work, you might want to discuss your plans on [EMAIL PROTECTED], so we can make sure it fits in with other things people have thought about doing, etc. -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] No more macros in CVS?
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 08:27, Lonnie Borntreger wrote: > Went to update gal, gtkhtml and evolution (my nightly check for updates) > from the HEAD, and all three had all the files under their "macros" > directory removed. That means that autogen.sh fails since it can't find > files. > > Problem? > yes, somebidy yesterday removed the macros directory in his module, and as this directory is shared between all other modules, it removed it for all :-) On the main CVS server this is fixed, so you may need to wait for anoncvs to update. In the meanwhile, just copy the macros directory from other CVS module. cheers -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.gnome-db.org/ - http://www.ximian.com/ ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Red-carpet] Re: [Evolution] Release 1.0
For Debian Potato users: my line in /etc/apt/sources.list said 'potato', changing it to 'stable' i.e. deb http://red-carpet.ximian.com/debian stable main made updates coming in, including Evolution 1.0. Hope it helps. -- Alessio F. Bragadini[EMAIL PROTECTED] APL Financial Services http://village.albourne.com Nicosia, Cyprus phone: +357-22-755750 "It is more complicated than you think" -- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925 ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Strange bug in v1.0
Hi all, I'm wondering whether anyone else is able to duplicate the Evolution bug I've now managed to dupe on two systems. I *tried* to create my first HTML email this morning as I needed to create a simple 2 column table and didn't want to have to attach a word document. I got all the table created, but before I sent the email I decided to embolden the first row. I selected the text in the first row of the table, right to left (i.e., started at end of second cell to the start of the first cell) then selected Format->Style->Bold. The entire content part of the email disappeared! I tried various attempts at resizing the window, minimizing or rolling up the window and restoring but nothing brought it back. I tried to save it as a draft, which crashed Evolution's mail shell. I tried to create a table tonight on my home system rather than my work machine and trying to make the header row bold again also killed the mail window, losing the content. Can anyone else duplicate this to the point that it can be declared a bug? (RH 7.1 with latest recommended RedHat updates, Ximian updates and Kernel 2.4.16 in use on both systems...) Cheers, -Preston de Guise. -- "There are no secrets. The networked market knows more than companies do about their own products. And whether the news is good or bad, they tell everyone." http://www.cluetrain.com Receipt of this email does not constitute permission to add the originating address to any email list. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] bug in "next unread message" ?
hi all, maybe this is a bug, or I dont understand the behaviour... when I have a folder with read and unread mails (all visible), I can read one of the unread emails by clicking on it (of course). when I want to read the next unread message, I type "N". when I at first did not clicked on the first unread message, then search wraps around when typing "N" and the last unread message had been reached. the (maybe) wrong behaviour is the wrap-around: when the very first message in the folder is an unread message, the wrap-around does not work properly - it jumps to the SECOND unread message in the folder. to go to the first of these messages, I have to type "P". regards -stefan palme- -- - Dipl. Inf. (FH) Stefan Palme email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phon: +49 341 3910484 fax: +49 1212 517956219 - msg03895/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] LDAP
Yes, take a look at http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution/2001-October/013873.html Maybe this should be put in an FAQ? > Is there anyone out there who has successfully gotten Evo to perform an > LDAP lookup against an Exchange 5.5 server? Ximians bugzilla says that > this has been long since fixed but I've never been able to get it to > work. I've tried several other LDAP clients in addition to Outlook > Express and they all work fine. But Evo is a no-go. Kinda sucks not > being able to look at that Global Address List... -- James Ogley, Unix Systems Administrator, Pinnacle Insurance Plc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.pinnacle.co.uk +44 (0) 20 8731 3619 Using Free Software since 1994, running GNU/Linux (SuSE 7.x) This email was created and sent with Ximian Evolution 1.0 NEW: Advogato diary at www.advogato.org/person/riggwelter *** CONFIDENTIALITY. This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Pinnacle Insurance Plc. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify our Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 8207 9555. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ** ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Bug in 1.0?
I get the same behavior. --Ben On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 00:54, Pavel Lisy wrote: > When I try search any phrase (strings with space) I don't receive any > result. > > eg. > > in folder with message: > > - > ... > Pozor!: "martin.metelka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > > V dopise, který jste poslal, byl nalezen virus Virus. > Antivirový program jej zadržel a zastavil jeho další doručování > na místo určení. > > Virus Virus byl popsán jako: > > I-Worm.BadtransII > > > Obnovte, prosím, databázi vašeho antivirového programu nebo > kontaktujte co nejdříve vašeho správce sítě (systému), protože > ve vašem systému je virus. > ... > -- > > I search > > dopise > > and receive matched message, but when I try search > > V dopise > > I receive nothing > > It seams to be bug? Or it is feature? :-(( > > The same behaviour is in vFolder searching. > > My locale settings is LANG=cs_CZ > LC_CTYPE="cs_CZ" > LC_NUMERIC="cs_CZ" > LC_TIME="cs_CZ" > LC_COLLATE="cs_CZ" > LC_MONETARY="cs_CZ" > LC_MESSAGES="cs_CZ" > LC_PAPER="cs_CZ" > LC_NAME="cs_CZ" > LC_ADDRESS="cs_CZ" > LC_TELEPHONE="cs_CZ" > LC_MEASUREMENT="cs_CZ" > LC_IDENTIFICATION="cs_CZ" > LC_ALL= > > Any solution? > > Pavel > > > > -- > Pavel Lisy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > T-MAPY spol. s r.o., http://www.tmapy.cz > Nezvalova 850, Hradec Kralove, 50003 > tel: +420-49-5513335 fax: +420-49-5513371 > > O mapach vime vse: http://www.tmapserver.cz > > > ___ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Bug in 1.0?
When I try search any phrase (strings with space) I don't receive any result. eg. in folder with message: - ... Pozor!: "martin.metelka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. V dopise, který jste poslal, byl nalezen virus Virus. Antivirový program jej zadržel a zastavil jeho další doručování na místo určení. Virus Virus byl popsán jako: I-Worm.BadtransII Obnovte, prosím, databázi vašeho antivirového programu nebo kontaktujte co nejdříve vašeho správce sítě (systému), protože ve vašem systému je virus. ... -- I search dopise and receive matched message, but when I try search V dopise I receive nothing It seams to be bug? Or it is feature? :-(( The same behaviour is in vFolder searching. My locale settings is LANG=cs_CZ LC_CTYPE="cs_CZ" LC_NUMERIC="cs_CZ" LC_TIME="cs_CZ" LC_COLLATE="cs_CZ" LC_MONETARY="cs_CZ" LC_MESSAGES="cs_CZ" LC_PAPER="cs_CZ" LC_NAME="cs_CZ" LC_ADDRESS="cs_CZ" LC_TELEPHONE="cs_CZ" LC_MEASUREMENT="cs_CZ" LC_IDENTIFICATION="cs_CZ" LC_ALL= Any solution? Pavel -- Pavel Lisy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> T-MAPY spol. s r.o., http://www.tmapy.cz Nezvalova 850, Hradec Kralove, 50003 tel: +420-49-5513335 fax: +420-49-5513371 O mapach vime vse: http://www.tmapserver.cz ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] A newbie question...
just click for writing a new message. fill in your bbc and everything else you want and then click at File -> Save as Draft Manuel On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 21:10, James Harrison wrote: > On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 11:01, Manuel Streuhofer wrote: > > imap is what you are looking for. :) > If only I could use imap... > > > but the bbc can be done with a template... > I looked in the help, and found no information on how to create a > template... > Anyone have any ideas? > > Thanks, > Jamie > > > > > Manuel > > > > On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 17:41, James Harrison wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > > > Is their a way to have each message I compose to be automatically bcc'ed > > > to myself, and turn off storing sent messages in the sent items. I > > > would like to do this because I use mutliple email clients and would > > > like to keep them all synchronized. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > James > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > > > > > > > ___ > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > > > > ___ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] configure with kerb problems
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 07:53, Arren Mund wrote: > here's what i run when i do the configure: > > ./configure --with-db3=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.1/ > --with-krb4=/usr/heimdal/ > Heimdal is kerberos 5 not kerberos 4, pick up the the KTH kerberos 4 implementation at http://www.pdc.kth.se/kth-krb/ /Nico -- Niklas Jakobsson - System Engineer @ PDC-KTH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pdc.kth.se/~nico/ ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
