[Evolution] Figured it out!

[Slater, Christopher M]

Sorry about my previous question -- forgot to run libtool.

Please disregard my previous question. Thank you.

Chris Slater

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

[Evolution] configure problems

[Slater, Christopher M]

Hi,

I've recently been attempting to configure evolution to compile. I've ran
into the following problems:

* I have libxml 1.8.17 and the configure script is reporting back to me that
libxml can't be found, even though they are installed in
/usr/include/gnome-xml!

My distro is my own: I have an LFS system.

Any ideas?

Chris Slater

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Re: Can't view .jpg

[Jeffrey Stedfast]

works fine for me...

Jeff

On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 20:46, Seth wrote:
>  
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Here is the original message just simply forwarded. Using outlook
> 2002, and evo can't determine, what type it is.
> 
> Seth
> 
> 
> - -Original Message-
> From: Tanya Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 5:17 PM
> To: gerri haumschild; SETH; janice griffith
> Subject: Fw: No Markers
> 
> 
> 
> - - Original Message -
> From: "Kim Hoile" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tanya Hollen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Joyce (Work) Spinks"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Barbara Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:15 AM
> Subject: FW: No Markers
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Timothy Hoile [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:00 AM
> > To: Kim (Work) Hoile
> > Subject: Fw: No Markers
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "BTMCase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jordan Taylor" 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> "Kim
> > and TJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Skip Lilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> >  "Jimmy/Angela Lilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Clark and Connie" 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 8:50 PM
> > Subject: Fw: No Markers
> >
> >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "gordon hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "bob amanda&nate king" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Bill&Turah" 
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "cheryl stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > "Bob&Josie"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:14 AM
> > > Subject: Fw: No Markers
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "mkndy68" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "Theresa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Terry & Colleen"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > > > "Stacy & Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Sally" 
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > > "Rod
> > > > & Missy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Peg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > > > "Mom  &
> > Henry"
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lori B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lin" 
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Kevin & Les"
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;  "Ken
> &
> > > Jo
> > > > Ann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > > > "Jeff & 
> > Heidi"
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Heather" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
> > > > "Grandma & Grandpa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "George & Lisa" 
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > > "Doug
> > > > & Bettye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Diane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
> > > > "Darcy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Cindy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "2E &
> > > >  Lisa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 5:53 PM
> > > > Subject: Fw: No Markers
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Russ & Karen Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > To: Tammy Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Laura Curran
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > > > > Dennie Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Kathy Asmann (E-mail)
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > > > > Pat Adams (E-mail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Vicky Cook 
> > > > > (E-mail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Date: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:43 PM
> > > > > Subject: FW: No Markers
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >-Original Message-
> > > > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > >Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:03 PM
> > > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
> > > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >Subject: No Markers
> > > > > >
> > > > > >This is why you don't give Markers to kids...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use 
> 
> iQA/AwUBPFIKg0u+O1SmNwFOEQLoOQCg4q3LgfQA4IRAXO110n0/ejZy3xMAn29z
> A/6p1QSg6Rvx5/d4JiVLKasa
> =C0jC
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>  
-- 
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  - www.ximian.com


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

[Evolution] Regex Match problem

[Malcolm V]

I'm trying to send all email I receive with subject lines that are all
caps (and punctuation, etc) to a separate folder. At present I'm using a
filter set as Regex Match,Message Header with this value
^Subject:[^[:lower:]]*$
 which essentially checks for subject lines which contain no lower case
characters. However, this doesn't work?

Am I going about this the right way, or is there a better method to
achieve my goal?

Cheers,
  Malcolm Valentine.



msg05210/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Evolution] i dont want to read html mail

[k]

sorry if this has been posted before, didn't find it in the faq...

so, when i receive html email, i would like to only view the NONhtml
version as default. (html mails are slow to display, and i hate them
anyway)

can i set this somewhere, if so, what sould i change?

TIA,

k



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

[Evolution] Can I tell evo that my IMAP server is local?

[Randy Orrison]

I'm using an IMAP server to access my mail files; the files and server
are both on my local machine.  Evolution apparently caches the headers
of all messages, and bodies of opened messages; the cache takes up more
space than the mail itself:

$ du Mail/ | tail -1
23204   Mail
$ du evolution/mail/imap | tail -1
24284   evolution/mail/imap

Is there any way that I can tell evolution not to bother caching the
bodies and headers of mail that's is itself local?

Thanks!

Randy



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Error when sending mail to some addresses

[Mark Neill]

Yep, this is a mail server error, not an Evolution error.

I have a guess as to the problem, but requires me making a guess as to
your setup.  Are you either A) running on an internal network with your
Linux box acting as the firewall/SMTP forwarder, and do not have your
private IP's/names listed in the allow config files for forwarding?  Or B)
Using your ISP's mail server to send the Email, and not sending them from
a From: address that belongs in their domain (i.e., your FRom address is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] adn you're using mail.attbi.com for your outgoing mail
server)?

See if either of these conditions reflects your configuration - they can
affect a relaying bounce on your mailserver.





On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Neil Weisenfeld wrote:
> I had this problem, also.  In general, it
doesn't *sound* like an
> Evolution bug, but rather an error with the machine you're communicating
> to.  Debugging the mail connection, however I noticed something odd: the
> actual error was "Relaying denied", no the "mailbox unavailable" that
> was reported.  The latter makes it sound like a transient error when the
> former makes perfect sense and means that I have to change how I use
> remote mail.  The bug seems to be simply that the error reported isn't
> correct.
>
> Maybe turning on debugging would help?  There's an FAQ question on it,
> but e-mail me if you can't find it.
>
>
> Regards,
> Neil
>
>
>
> On 25 Jan 2002, Christoffer Olsen wrote:
>
> > Date: 25 Jan 2002 20:13:45 +0100
> > From: Christoffer Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Evolution] Error when sending mail to some addresses
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > I use evolution on my Linux Mandrake box, nothing between my box and the
> > internet. When I am trying to send certain emails, i get the message
> > "RCPT TO response error: Requested action not taken: mailbox
> > unavailable: mail not sent". This happends on most regular email
> > addresses, including this one, sending to myself. It does rarely happend
> > on email addresses including dashes or alike. I a musing Evolution 1.0.1
> >
> > Else, it's a great app - could need some work on making things easy to
> > fix. It is really a great application =)
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ___
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
>


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] /home/$user/evolution question

[Jeremiah Stanley]

> > Evolution is currently setup to put all of you configs and email into
> > the /home/$user/evolution folder. Is there a way in a config/menu to
> > configure this to use a hidden dot directory (like
> > /home/$user/.evolution/)?

> I vote for an environment variable, EVOLUTION_MAIL which is to be used
> first (or when  ${HOME}/evolution does not exist :-? )
> 
> Which is as simple as:
> 
> char* evodir=getenv("EVOLUTION_MAIL");

This sounds very elegant to me, does anybody know where to start with a
patch and what sort of libraries you'd be dealing with to do this?

JStanley



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution] /home/$user/evolution question

[Wouter Van Hemel]

On 25 Jan 2002, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:

> On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 19:15, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> > Evolution is currently setup to put all of you configs and email into
> > the /home/$user/evolution folder. Is there a way in a config/menu to
> > configure this to use a hidden dot directory (like
> > /home/$user/.evolution/)?
> >
> > I have yet to find anything in the configs that leads me to think that I
> > can set that.
> >
> >
> >   Indeed, that's not configurable in 1.0.x.
>
> I vote for an environment variable, EVOLUTION_MAIL which is to be used
> first (or when  ${HOME}/evolution does not exist :-? )
>
> Which is as simple as:
>
> char* evodir=getenv("EVOLUTION_MAIL");
>

I must say I like this proposal. The evolution/ folder bugs me a bit (but
I'm already happy it's not Ximian/Evolution/ - the M$-way ;) ), it'd be
cool to put it in .evolution (or whatever). This can't be so hard to do...

While I'm at it, well, I'd like to nag about the forced sigdash appending,
and the fixed line wrap at the 72th pos. It's not too much of a problem, I
patch it out before compilation, but well, since I was already nagging... :)

I don't want to give the wrong impression, Evolution runs pretty stable on
my machine, and it looks good - I'm generally very satisfied with it. Keep
up the good work!


  wouter

PS: Did somebody try mixed use of mailboxes for Evolution and Pine? I'd
like to stop running an imapd for localhost... :)


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Error when sending mail to some addresses

[Neil Weisenfeld]

I had this problem, also.  In general, it doesn't *sound* like an
Evolution bug, but rather an error with the machine you're communicating
to.  Debugging the mail connection, however I noticed something odd: the
actual error was "Relaying denied", no the "mailbox unavailable" that
was reported.  The latter makes it sound like a transient error when the
former makes perfect sense and means that I have to change how I use
remote mail.  The bug seems to be simply that the error reported isn't
correct.

Maybe turning on debugging would help?  There's an FAQ question on it,
but e-mail me if you can't find it.


Regards,
Neil



On 25 Jan 2002, Christoffer Olsen wrote:

> Date: 25 Jan 2002 20:13:45 +0100
> From: Christoffer Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Evolution] Error when sending mail to some addresses
> 
> Hey,
> 
> I use evolution on my Linux Mandrake box, nothing between my box and the
> internet. When I am trying to send certain emails, i get the message
> "RCPT TO response error: Requested action not taken: mailbox
> unavailable: mail not sent". This happends on most regular email
> addresses, including this one, sending to myself. It does rarely happend
> on email addresses including dashes or alike. I a musing Evolution 1.0.1
> 
> Else, it's a great app - could need some work on making things easy to
> fix. It is really a great application =)
> 
> 
> 



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] no way to archive encrypted sent messages readable?

[Ian Goldberg]

On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 12:56, Niels Heinemann wrote:
> hoi, ian.
> 
> Am Fre, 2002-01-25 um 14.16 schrieb Ian Goldberg:
> > The way I do this is to arrange for my incoming mail to be decrypted
> > *before* it's stored in the evolution mbox (I use premail for this).
> good point. but my question referred to my outgoing mail.

Ah, sorry.  Too early in the morning it was.  :-)  But the point's still
valid.  If you send your outgoing email encrypted to you also, then if
your key is ever compromised in the future, all your past email may be
revealed.

> > From a crypto/security point of view, that's what you want, anyway.
> > Otherwise, what do you do when you cycle your encryption key?  I store
> > my received emails pgp-decrypted, on an encrypted Linux partition.
> well, i'm just interested: whats the difference between an encrypted
> mail and an encrypted partition when your key changes?

It's easy to re-encrypt a partition with a new key, even quite often. 
The equivalent operation with PGP would be to take every PGP-encrypted
message you can find encrypted to your old key, decrypt the messages,
re-encrypt them with your new key, delete your old key, and hope you
didn't miss any.

   - Ian

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

[Evolution] Mandrake 8.1 Help!

[Jerry Roy]

Hello 
All,
 
How 
the hell do I start Ximian Desktop? is there an Executable?
 
I have 
installed all the files from the Mandrake 8.1 ftp directory on their 
site. After running RPM -ivh on all of them I get the following dependencies 
errors:
 
[root@pollito ximian_gnome]# rpm -ivh *.rpmerror: 
failed dependencies:libguppidata.so.11 is needed by 
gnucash-1.6.2-3.ximian.2libguppidataui.so.11 is needed by 
gnucash-1.6.2-3.ximian.2 libguppimath.so.11 is needed by 
gnucash-1.6.2-3.ximian.2libguppiplot.so.11 is needed by 
gnucash-1.6.2-3.ximian.2 libguppispecfns.so.11 is needed by 
gnucash-1.6.2-3.ximian.2libguppistat.so.11 is needed by 
gnucash-1.6.2-3.ximian.2libguppitank.so.11 is needed by 
gnucash-1.6.2-3.ximian.2 libguppiuseful.so.11 is needed by 
gnucash-1.6.2-3.ximian.2 libguile9-devel is needed by 
gnucash-devel-1.6.2-3.ximian.2 mozilla < 0.9.7 conflicts with 
libnspr4-0.9.7-7mdk.ximian.4libnss3-ximian = 0.9.7 is needed by 
libnss-devel-0.9.7-7mdk.ximian.4 freetype2-devel is needed by 
nautilus-devel-1.0.6-9.ximian.3
 
 

  -Original Message-From: Jerry Roy Sent: 
  Friday, January 25, 2002 10:38 AMTo: 'Ettore 
  Perazzoli'Subject: RE: [Evolution] /home/$user/evolution 
  question
  You 
  need more Bandwidth,
   
  This 
  is painfully slow on the download. When will Mandrake 8.1 be 
  ready?
   
  Best 
  Regards,
   
  Jerry Roy
  
-Original Message-From: Ettore Perazzoli 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:16 
AMTo: Jeremiah StanleyCc: Evolution Mailing 
ListSubject: Re: [Evolution] /home/$user/evolution 
question
Evolution is currently setup to put all of you configs and email into
the /home/$user/evolution folder. Is there a way in a config/menu to
configure this to use a hidden dot directory (like
/home/$user/.evolution/)?

I have yet to find anything in the configs that leads me to think that I
can set that.  Indeed, that's not configurable in 1.0.x. 

  
  
-- Ettore 
  

[Evolution] Re: GPG signatures

[Sidney Markowitz]

> How is that a patch for Evolution .. to make the OTHER client see
> the message as something more than 2 sttachments (which is how Outlook
> Express sees GPG signed stuff)?
[...]
> I'm confused.

No, I'm confused :-) I use Outlook Express on another machine and I
confused a question from someone who has problems with Evolution
*sending* mail with a GPG signature with complaints about mailers like
Outlook Express that don't know how to *read* a GPG signature. That's
what I get for hitting 'reply' before I've had my first cup of coffee in
the morning.

 -- sidney



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Importing from PMMail

[Kenneth Porter]

On Fri, 2001-12-28 at 23:54, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> I'm expecting to completely switch from PMMail to Evolution shortly
> (just upgraded my system from RH6x to allow it). PMMail stores mail as
> individual message files, and a folder is just a directory with some
> special files containing the meta information. What would be an
> appropriate way to convert those to Evolution folders?

I asked on the Qpopper list and one suggestion was to use packf from the
nmh package.

Now that I've got that part of the puzzle, how do I get evo to recognize
my hierarchy of mbox files? If I get the directory structure right, is
there some way to get evo to generate the metadata files?


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] /home/$user/evolution question

[Soeren Sonnenburg]

On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 19:15, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> Evolution is currently setup to put all of you configs and email into
> the /home/$user/evolution folder. Is there a way in a config/menu to
> configure this to use a hidden dot directory (like
> /home/$user/.evolution/)?
>
> I have yet to find anything in the configs that leads me to think that I
> can set that.
>
> 
>   Indeed, that's not configurable in 1.0.x.

I vote for an environment variable, EVOLUTION_MAIL which is to be used
first (or when  ${HOME}/evolution does not exist :-? )

Which is as simple as:

char* evodir=getenv("EVOLUTION_MAIL");

Thanks,
Soeren.


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

[Evolution] Error when sending mail to some addresses

[Christoffer Olsen]

Hey,

I use evolution on my Linux Mandrake box, nothing between my box and the
internet. When I am trying to send certain emails, i get the message
"RCPT TO response error: Requested action not taken: mailbox
unavailable: mail not sent". This happends on most regular email
addresses, including this one, sending to myself. It does rarely happend
on email addresses including dashes or alike. I a musing Evolution 1.0.1

Else, it's a great app - could need some work on making things easy to
fix. It is really a great application =)





signature.asc
Description: Dette er en digitalt signert meldingsdel

Re: [Evolution] GPG signatures

[John Gateley]

On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 12:31, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> Uh, I'm pretty sure you are wrong about what evolution is doing in this
> case. Evolution *always* converts to CRLF before feeding it to pgp. How
> did you go about tracking this down?
> 
> Are you just comparing what is in the mbox? because the mbox is stored
> without the CR's (mbox files are not supposed to have CR's).

I looked at the raw file (stored in Maildir format,
not mbox format) before Evolution or my imap daemon
touched the message. Some (but not all) of the lines
had  terminators, and some had  terminators.

I then read the message with Evolution and did a 
"save as" to save the text. This had only 
terminators.

I had the same person send me another message
without any  terminators, and it verified
fine.

The message was signed by Mutt on Linux (with
a DOS .signature file included, which is where
the ^Ms come from).

j

-- 
Public key at http://www.jriver.com/~gateley



msg05196/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [Evolution] BUG: Hidden message in threaded view

[Xavier Bestel]

le ven 25-01-2002 à 19:09, Ettore Perazzoli a écrit :
> The subject says it all: I have 2 messages (in fact, it's the same
> because I was twice in the Cc: under different adresses), and when in
> threaded view I see only 1 of them.
> Latest Evo from Debian/unstable
> 
>   Can you reproduce this by copying the messages into a new folder?
> 
>   If so, it would be nice to see the messages...

Sorry, just deleted them a few hours ago, I thought nobody was
interested.
I'll do it next time.

Xav


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] category support for Pilot syncing

[JP Rosevear]

On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 16:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Are there plans for category support for the Pilot?  There are two ways
> that I've seen this (the fact that the PIM supports multiple categories,
> which the Palm does not) handled with Outlook: 

This is already bug 1167.

> 1. Special Palm-specific categories are installed within Evolution.
>While they won't be mutually exclusive, if multiple are selected on
>the PIM side, the first (in alphabetical order) could be chosen. 
> 
> 2. The first (in alphabetical order) PIM-side category with a name
>matching a Palm-side category is used on the Palm side. 

There are still issues  with doing things like renaming a palm category.
 
-JP
-- 
--
===
JP Rosevear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ximian Inc. http://www.ximian.com

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] GPG signatures

[Jeffrey Stedfast]

On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 13:26, John Gateley wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 19:19, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 17:53, John Gateley wrote:
> > > I have a GPG signature that works in mutt
> > > but not in Evolution, and it is NOT an
> > > inline signature: it comes in two MIME
> > > parts, one for the body and one for the
> > > signature, just like Evolution does. Are
> > > there any known bugs with Evolution that
> > > would cause this?
> > 
> > [...]The problem comes in because
> > write_to_stream() is not guarenteed to write the MIME part out exactly
> > byte-for-byte the way it was in the original message (it's usually very
> > close - the problem is usually the QP encoding of the content, some
> > clients wrap lines at fewer chars-per-line than our encoder does).
> 
> I tracked it down: the message had  terminating
> some of the lines, and Evolution is converting those
> to plain old  (actually deleting them)before
> checking the signature.

Uh, I'm pretty sure you are wrong about what evolution is doing in this
case. Evolution *always* converts to CRLF before feeding it to pgp. How
did you go about tracking this down?

Are you just comparing what is in the mbox? because the mbox is stored
without the CR's (mbox files are not supposed to have CR's).

Jeff

> 
> j
> 
> -- 
> Public key at http://www.jriver.com/~gateley
-- 
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  - www.ximian.com


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] scheduling/appointment from evolution to outlook in1.0.1 broke?

[Dan Winship]

On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 12:49, Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper wrote:
> I used to be able to schedule an appointment in evolution, select
> recipients, and send the message--and have that be understood by outlook
> clients.  However, using evolution 1.0.1 and libcamel 1.0.1 from debian
> unstable, what shows up in outlook is just "Event Information".

The problem is that Outlook's iCalendar support sucks, and different
versions of Outlook suck in different ways, also depending on whether
they are talking to an Exchange server or an IMAP/POP server.

Shortly after Evo 1.0 was released, we discovered that we could only
send iCalendar requests to Outlook users who *weren't* using Exchange.
Given that scheduling is done more often in Exchange environments than
in non-Exchange environments, we switched this to work the other way for
1.0.1. You can get the old behavior back by setting the environment
variable "EVOLUTION_SEND_IMIP_AS_ATTACHMENT" in evolution-calendar's
environment.

In Evo 1.2 (not 1.0.2) it will be fixed to work with either version, but
this requires some fairly messy code changes.

Oh, also, I believe Outlook XP does the right thing with either format
whether or not you're using Exchange.

-- Dan

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] /home/$user/evolution question

[Ettore Perazzoli]

Evolution is currently setup to put all of you configs and email into
the /home/$user/evolution folder. Is there a way in a config/menu to
configure this to use a hidden dot directory (like
/home/$user/.evolution/)?

I have yet to find anything in the configs that leads me to think that I
can set that.

  Indeed, that's not configurable in 1.0.x.





-- Ettore

Re: [Evolution] GPG signatures

[John Gateley]

On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 19:19, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 17:53, John Gateley wrote:
> > I have a GPG signature that works in mutt
> > but not in Evolution, and it is NOT an
> > inline signature: it comes in two MIME
> > parts, one for the body and one for the
> > signature, just like Evolution does. Are
> > there any known bugs with Evolution that
> > would cause this?
> 
> [...]The problem comes in because
> write_to_stream() is not guarenteed to write the MIME part out exactly
> byte-for-byte the way it was in the original message (it's usually very
> close - the problem is usually the QP encoding of the content, some
> clients wrap lines at fewer chars-per-line than our encoder does).

I tracked it down: the message had  terminating
some of the lines, and Evolution is converting those
to plain old  (actually deleting them)before
checking the signature.

j

-- 
Public key at http://www.jriver.com/~gateley



msg05191/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [Evolution] BUG: Hidden message in threaded view

[Ettore Perazzoli]

The subject says it all: I have 2 messages (in fact, it's the same
because I was twice in the Cc: under different adresses), and when in
threaded view I see only 1 of them.
Latest Evo from Debian/unstable

  Can you reproduce this by copying the messages into a new folder?



  If so, it would be nice to see the messages...





-- Ettore

Re: [Evolution] no way to archive encrypted sent messages readable?

[Niels Heinemann]

hoi, ian.

Am Fre, 2002-01-25 um 14.16 schrieb Ian Goldberg:
> The way I do this is to arrange for my incoming mail to be decrypted
> *before* it's stored in the evolution mbox (I use premail for this).
good point. but my question referred to my outgoing mail.
 
> From a crypto/security point of view, that's what you want, anyway.
> Otherwise, what do you do when you cycle your encryption key?  I store
> my received emails pgp-decrypted, on an encrypted Linux partition.
well, i'm just interested: whats the difference between an encrypted
mail and an encrypted partition when your key changes?

thx, niels
-- 
 |  /"\ 
[niels@|www.]ortschmiede.de  |  \ /  ASCII-Ribbon-Campaign
 pgp|gpg - mails preferred   |   X Against HTML Mail
 |  / \ 






msg05189/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Evolution] scheduling/appointment from evolution to outlook in 1.0.1 broke?

[Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper]

I used to be able to schedule an appointment in evolution, select
recipients, and send the message--and have that be understood by outlook
clients.  However, using evolution 1.0.1 and libcamel 1.0.1 from debian
unstable, what shows up in outlook is just "Event Information".  No
iCalendar attachment or anything else.  I've just switched back to
evolution 1.0 and libcamel 1.0 and it works correctly.

Anyone else see this breakage?


-- 
%<--%<
Jason Kasper (vanRijn)
bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
Numbers 6:24-26

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] no way to archive encrypted sent messages readable?

[Niels Heinemann]

hoi.

Am Fre, 2002-01-25 um 10.51 schrieb Janus Christensen:
> Have you tried the "Always encrypt to myself when sending encrypted
> mail" 
think thats it.
muchas gracias, niels
-- 
 |  /"\ 
[niels@|www.]ortschmiede.de  |  \ /  ASCII-Ribbon-Campaign
 pgp|gpg - mails preferred   |   X Against HTML Mail
 |  / \ 






msg05187/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [Evolution] Re: GPG signatures

[Mike Leone]

> The workaround to this problem with inline signatures is to make the
> message and the signature separate MIME parts and specify that their
> contents are opaque. But then it is up to the mail client to recognize
> the "Content-type: multipart/signed" and the "Content-disposition:
> inline" MIME headers so it gets displayed as something other than a
> couple of attachments, yet still can be verified as a signed message.
> And that's where somebody gets to write and submit a patch  for
> Evolution.

How is that a patch for Evolution .. to make the OTHER client see the message as 
something more than 2 sttachments (which is how Outlook Express sees GPG signed 
stuff)? Wouldn't the Evo patch make Evo NOT send as "Content-type: multipart/signed" 
and the "Content-disposition: inline" MIME headers? Which would then not render it 
opaque?

I'm confused.




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

[Evolution] Re: GPG signatures

[Sidney Markowitz]

> GPG signature [...]
> comes in two MIME parts
[...]
> I also got mail from CERT today, and that
> signature fails because it is an inline
> signature.

These are two sides of the same coin. There are some mail servers or
relays that will alter the content of the message in some way. Microsoft
Exchange servers are particularly likely to do this. There are limits on
line length before wrapping, changes to QP encoding, whatever. Even a
one bit change will invalidate the signature before Evolution ever sees
it. If the alteration happens before you receive the message there is
nothing Evolution or any mail client can do about it.

The workaround to this problem with inline signatures is to make the
message and the signature separate MIME parts and specify that their
contents are opaque. But then it is up to the mail client to recognize
the "Content-type: multipart/signed" and the "Content-disposition:
inline" MIME headers so it gets displayed as something other than a
couple of attachments, yet still can be verified as a signed message.
And that's where somebody gets to write and submit a patch  for
Evolution.

 -- sidney



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] no way to archive encrypted sent messages readable?

[Ian Goldberg]

On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 02:57, Niels Heinemann wrote:
> hi, all
> does anybody of you know a way (or is it planned to implement one) to
> leave an unencrypted version of sent messages in my folder tree?
> it seems impossible to read my outgoing mails to persons which prefer
> gpged mails.

The way I do this is to arrange for my incoming mail to be decrypted
*before* it's stored in the evolution mbox (I use premail for this).

>From a crypto/security point of view, that's what you want, anyway.
Otherwise, what do you do when you cycle your encryption key?  I store
my received emails pgp-decrypted, on an encrypted Linux partition.

   - Ian

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

[Evolution] Using LDAP lookup in the mail composer / MS Exchange

[Pascal Bleser]

Hi.
Using Evo 1.0.1 on SuSE 7.3
Server is M$ exchange...

I can't figure out how to use LDAP to make address lookups in the
composer window (To:-field). It works great with the normal contacts, of
course...
Is this feature really working ? Or is it just because of the exchange
server ?

Note that when I switch to the Contacts and make a search there, it
works.
It seems to me that the composer only uses the normal contacts address
book and not the LDAP server...

I made a script that uses ldapsearch to dump the whole address list out
of the exchange server in LDIF format and imported it into Evo.
After a lockup of Evo, killing some servants and restarting it, it works
fine, but a LDAP lookup would be nicer of course ;-)

BTW, if someone figured out how to use the iCal attachment to send
meeting requests to Outlook users, please tell me...
I tried it and they just get a normal mail with an attachment and
Outlook doesn't seem to be able to do anything with it :-\

Does anyone know of a way of fetching the calendar information out of
Exchange by any means ? Maybe writing a filter on those meeting
notification mails would work: most of the info is included in the mail.
But then again, it would be hard to reintegrate it into Evo's
calendar... :\

Except those problems, Evo is really great ;-)
Thanks for the good work...

--
  -o) Pascal Bleser   ATOS Origin/Aachen(DE) |
  /\\ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
 _\_v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
-|
Jesus saves,Buddha makes incremental backups :
-'

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] can't vew .jpg images inline

[Xavier Bestel]

le ven 25-01-2002 à 12:47, Seth Hollen a écrit :
> I don't see anything like you said. here are some snippets.
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> then the rest of the message
> <>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> begin 666 NoMarkers.jpg
> then the image shows up as lots of text when I choose view email source.

?? I thought Evo understood uuencoded things ?
Aaah, perhaps it's not a true MIME attachment ... could you send us more
about this mail (ie, not the text nor the picture, but what's inbetween)
?

Xav


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] can't vew .jpg images inline

[Seth Hollen]

I don't see anything like you said. here are some snippets.
Mime-Version: 1.0
then the rest of the message
<>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


begin 666 NoMarkers.jpg
then the image shows up as lots of text when I choose view email source.

So I'm guessing the original sender didn't have the proper encoding?


thanks!

Seth

On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 04:24, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> le jeu 24-01-2002 à 02:32, Seth Hollen a écrit :
> > My wife sent me an .jpg image file and Evo 's only options were to view
> > in xine or save to disk.After saving it nautilus recognizes it as an
> > image file.
> > 
> > How can I tell Evo to open >jpg file or view them inline?
> 
> Could you tell us under which mime-type did she send it ? Look at the
> mail source (View->Message->Source, or something like that) for a string
> like "Content-Type: image/jpeg".
> 
>   Xav
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> 
-- 
Take care,

Seth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
727-919-1598



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] no way to archive encrypted sent messages readable?

[Janus Christensen]

On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 08:57, Niels Heinemann wrote:
> hi, all
> does anybody of you know a way (or is it planned to implement one) to
> leave an unencrypted version of sent messages in my folder tree?
> it seems impossible to read my outgoing mails to persons which prefer
> gpged mails.
> thx in advance, niels

Have you tried the "Always encrypt to myself when sending encrypted
mail" option in the Security tab in the account settings? This should
allow you to decrypt the message using your key.

-- 
Janus Christensen __
I want something that'll give me the stamina of a young werewolf, the
vision of a shaman, the thoughts of a serial killer and the gentleness
of a hungry vampire bat.  --  Spider Jerusalem, Transmetropolitan




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part