RE: Need help with Exchange 5.5 to 2k with a few twists.
You can you use ExMerge to move mailboxes. Irfan Malik Network Engineer United Bank Limited. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Need help with Exchange 5.5 to 2k with a few twists. Here is the situation. Have an old exchange server from the old parent company. Parent company has long since died and this little faction has slit and prospered. So now we want to migrate to E2K, but its to a different server (W2K AS) in a whole new domain that I have been asked to build. And they do not want any traces of the old company's name anymore. (understandable) Now is there a way I can move the mailboxes and not have them hold onto any old info, like old inet addresses or do I have to manually add each box and set up permissions? The old exchange server right now has 2 internet addresses for each user. One for the old domain and they added one for the new domain. These are the issues that I speak of. Do not want to old domain internet addresses moved over. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need advice: Exchange 5.5 to 2k migration with a twist.
Here is the low down. Company splits from parent and takes the exchange server with it and takes a new name. Makes the old exchange server work for new domain. Now, new company wants to upgrade to exchange 2000. The new server is in a new domain. They do now want any traces at all of the parent company in the new server. Here is my question. Can I move mailboxes to the new server and not get any old info or do I have to maually make each mailbox new? I still need to move user accounts into the new domain as well and am waiting till I get some more info on the exchange upgrade. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Problem Exch 5.5 sp4 with Win2k sp2 & AD (new to the list)
I sent this yesterday, but I never saw it appear so I am trying again. I have a strange problem. I installed Exchange Server on a Windows 2000 Server with Active Directory. When anyone uses the the Web Access they can use their login name and see any email box they want. Any suggestions on where to look? The bosses are having a fit that anyone can see their e-mail from the Web Access. I am sure it has something to do with permissions, but I am very new to Windows 2000. Thanks, Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need help with Exchange 5.5 to 2k with a few twists.
Here is the situation. Have an old exchange server from the old parent company. Parent company has long since died and this little faction has slit and prospered. So now we want to migrate to E2K, but its to a different server (W2K AS) in a whole new domain that I have been asked to build. And they do not want any traces of the old company's name anymore. (understandable) Now is there a way I can move the mailboxes and not have them hold onto any old info, like old inet addresses or do I have to manually add each box and set up permissions? The old exchange server right now has 2 internet addresses for each user. One for the old domain and they added one for the new domain. These are the issues that I speak of. Do not want to old domain internet addresses moved over. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sbs4.5 migration to 2k diff server new naming...
I am running sbs 4.5 and looking to migrate to sbs2000 on a new server, with different naming convention for both server name,domain,org etc. I have read all the technet articles, but all say to keep same names.. use exmerge...or move edb's and run isinteg.. I am only interested in the Exchange stores and keeping the single instant message size, is there a way of moving these. Thanks in advance Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Requesting Data errors with SAN and Large Mailboxs
Cool. Will see if this is possible. Also will try Roger's suggestion also (restore last good backup and run eseutil against it) if that doesn't work. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 6:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Requesting Data errors with SAN and Large Mailboxs We had similar problems with our SAN after adding some new disks and assigning these to a separate non-exchange server - outlook started giving lots of 'requesting data from server' messages and other apps using the SAN for data storage also suffered poor performance. A complete shutdown and restart of the SAN cured everything. A little worrying, but that was six months ago and all is well and good since Dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange in it's own Domain
Nope. Just the same forest. - Original Message - From: "Darcy Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:06 PM Subject: RE: Exchange in it's own Domain Okay - I am confused then. I thought that with AD/E2K the mailbox server had to be in the same domain as the users (or in a domain above the users' in the hierarchy). -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 6:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange in it's own Domain Doesn't matter. Exchange has never needed to be in the same domain as users. - Original Message - From: "Darcy Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 8:59 PM Subject: RE: Exchange in it's own Domain Um. . .am I missing something here? I thought E2K went into the same domain as your users. Are you actually talking about Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000 servers? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange in it's own Domain What business need is driving this? While I've run separate "resource" domains for Exchange, it certainly doesn't make thinks easier. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:49 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange in it's own Domain > > > We are in the process of reorganizing our domain structure, > and basically I need to pull the Exchange 2000 box out of > it's existing 2000 domain and have it join a new one. Advice > was given to me from this list to copy all the mails to .pst > and reload Exchange, join the new domain and merge the mail > back in. I am desperately trying to avoid this. > > Is there any wisdom that says to have an Exchange box in a > separate domain as the rest of the users? I need some ammo > to recommend we leave the Exchange box where it is. The only > thing is I would have to have the Exchange computer be a DC > and have all the FSMO roles etc for a domain of one. > > > -- > Vincent Avallone > iBiquity Digital > (410) 872-1535 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange in it's own Domain
Okay - I am confused then. I thought that with AD/E2K the mailbox server had to be in the same domain as the users (or in a domain above the users' in the hierarchy). -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 6:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange in it's own Domain Doesn't matter. Exchange has never needed to be in the same domain as users. - Original Message - From: "Darcy Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 8:59 PM Subject: RE: Exchange in it's own Domain Um. . .am I missing something here? I thought E2K went into the same domain as your users. Are you actually talking about Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000 servers? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange in it's own Domain What business need is driving this? While I've run separate "resource" domains for Exchange, it certainly doesn't make thinks easier. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:49 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange in it's own Domain > > > We are in the process of reorganizing our domain structure, > and basically I need to pull the Exchange 2000 box out of > it's existing 2000 domain and have it join a new one. Advice > was given to me from this list to copy all the mails to .pst > and reload Exchange, join the new domain and merge the mail > back in. I am desperately trying to avoid this. > > Is there any wisdom that says to have an Exchange box in a > separate domain as the rest of the users? I need some ammo > to recommend we leave the Exchange box where it is. The only > thing is I would have to have the Exchange computer be a DC > and have all the FSMO roles etc for a domain of one. > > > -- > Vincent Avallone > iBiquity Digital > (410) 872-1535 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange in it's own Domain
Doesn't matter. Exchange has never needed to be in the same domain as users. - Original Message - From: "Darcy Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 8:59 PM Subject: RE: Exchange in it's own Domain Um. . .am I missing something here? I thought E2K went into the same domain as your users. Are you actually talking about Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000 servers? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange in it's own Domain What business need is driving this? While I've run separate "resource" domains for Exchange, it certainly doesn't make thinks easier. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:49 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange in it's own Domain > > > We are in the process of reorganizing our domain structure, > and basically I need to pull the Exchange 2000 box out of > it's existing 2000 domain and have it join a new one. Advice > was given to me from this list to copy all the mails to .pst > and reload Exchange, join the new domain and merge the mail > back in. I am desperately trying to avoid this. > > Is there any wisdom that says to have an Exchange box in a > separate domain as the rest of the users? I need some ammo > to recommend we leave the Exchange box where it is. The only > thing is I would have to have the Exchange computer be a DC > and have all the FSMO roles etc for a domain of one. > > > -- > Vincent Avallone > iBiquity Digital > (410) 872-1535 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange in it's own Domain
Um. . .am I missing something here? I thought E2K went into the same domain as your users. Are you actually talking about Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000 servers? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange in it's own Domain What business need is driving this? While I've run separate "resource" domains for Exchange, it certainly doesn't make thinks easier. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:49 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange in it's own Domain > > > We are in the process of reorganizing our domain structure, > and basically I need to pull the Exchange 2000 box out of > it's existing 2000 domain and have it join a new one. Advice > was given to me from this list to copy all the mails to .pst > and reload Exchange, join the new domain and merge the mail > back in. I am desperately trying to avoid this. > > Is there any wisdom that says to have an Exchange box in a > separate domain as the rest of the users? I need some ammo > to recommend we leave the Exchange box where it is. The only > thing is I would have to have the Exchange computer be a DC > and have all the FSMO roles etc for a domain of one. > > > -- > Vincent Avallone > iBiquity Digital > (410) 872-1535 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot
Ok, that worked now. But, is there a way to get the send address to look like the email address from the public folder and not where it says from "me" on behalf of the public folder email? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot Excerpt from slipstick: "If you want a user to send with a folder's address, the folder must not be hidden. ... Once the user has Send As permission, they can use View | From Field in Outlook to display the From box and either click From to choose from the Address Book or type in the name of the public folder or other mailbox. If the public folder is hidden from the GAL, the user should go to the folder's Properties page and add the folder's address to their own address book." Now, this is a little confusing. I did try it with both OAB and PAB, both SMTP and X.400 type addresses. It does not work with a hidden folder when you create the address manually. However, if you go through the steps in Q184545 to add the folder address to your personal address book, it works just fine. One more thing to note is, when I tried this I didn't have a PAB and it created a contact item in my Contacts folder instead, which works just fine. So you still don't need the PAB. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot I do not use PAB except for the fact that according to info on slipstick.com, you need the PAB to accept an email address on a public folder if hidden in the GAL. I need to keep the email address hidden from the GAL. If there is a method otherwise, I am ears. I did try before I added the PAB and it still did not work. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot Well, first off, sending as a public folder has nothing to do with your PAB. Remove the entry from your PAB and then ask yourself "Why on earth am I still using this beast if I'm on Outlook 2000?". That settled, try unhiding the PF from the GAL. You should be able to send as that PF then. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot I have setup public folders with email addresses assigned to them. I wish to send mail as the public folder but when I try, it says cannot send due to send as rights. In exch. admin for 5.5sp4, I have set myself permissions to SendAs. On my outlook 2000 client, I have setup a PAB to accept the address used on the public folder (the folder email addresses are hidden from the GAL). When I go to properties on the public folder, I add address to my PAB (it does not do it) so I manually add the email address to the PAB but still no good. What the heck am I missing? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Would two UMs play nice together?
If you have a problem, it will be with the ownership of defined objects. For example, two fax servers will both want to define how to handle a freeform address that looks like a phone number. I can't think of any specific conflicts that have to exist by definition in two UM systems, but they are probably in there. You may get to write the book on incompatibility issues. PS: Rumor has it that ITG is considering a similar change, so MS may already have some insight on this topic that is unpublished. -Original Message- From: Sanborn, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Would two UMs play nice together? We have Octel Unified Messenger 4.00 running on Exch5.5 sp4/ NT4 sp6a. We're testing Cisco UM 3.12 on another Organization in the same NT domain. Before banging our heads on the wall[1], we wanted to find out if Octel and Cisco UMs would even work together in the same Organization for the transition? Or is it a either/ or deal? It seems to me that with them using different connectors, there shouldn't be an issue. And once in Exchange it's 'just another message' and up to the client to display the message correctly. [1] ain't that why they give us these nice soft partitions? Or are they just getting us use to the idea of padded cells? Thanks John Sanborn Exchange Administrator AZ Army National Guard (602) 267-2981 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would two UMs play nice together?
We have Octel Unified Messenger 4.00 running on Exch5.5 sp4/ NT4 sp6a. We're testing Cisco UM 3.12 on another Organization in the same NT domain. Before banging our heads on the wall[1], we wanted to find out if Octel and Cisco UMs would even work together in the same Organization for the transition? Or is it a either/ or deal? It seems to me that with them using different connectors, there shouldn't be an issue. And once in Exchange it's 'just another message' and up to the client to display the message correctly. [1] ain't that why they give us these nice soft partitions? Or are they just getting us use to the idea of padded cells? Thanks John Sanborn Exchange Administrator AZ Army National Guard (602) 267-2981 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot
Excerpt from slipstick: "If you want a user to send with a folder's address, the folder must not be hidden. ... Once the user has Send As permission, they can use View | From Field in Outlook to display the From box and either click From to choose from the Address Book or type in the name of the public folder or other mailbox. If the public folder is hidden from the GAL, the user should go to the folder's Properties page and add the folder's address to their own address book." Now, this is a little confusing. I did try it with both OAB and PAB, both SMTP and X.400 type addresses. It does not work with a hidden folder when you create the address manually. However, if you go through the steps in Q184545 to add the folder address to your personal address book, it works just fine. One more thing to note is, when I tried this I didn't have a PAB and it created a contact item in my Contacts folder instead, which works just fine. So you still don't need the PAB. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot I do not use PAB except for the fact that according to info on slipstick.com, you need the PAB to accept an email address on a public folder if hidden in the GAL. I need to keep the email address hidden from the GAL. If there is a method otherwise, I am ears. I did try before I added the PAB and it still did not work. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot Well, first off, sending as a public folder has nothing to do with your PAB. Remove the entry from your PAB and then ask yourself "Why on earth am I still using this beast if I'm on Outlook 2000?". That settled, try unhiding the PF from the GAL. You should be able to send as that PF then. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot I have setup public folders with email addresses assigned to them. I wish to send mail as the public folder but when I try, it says cannot send due to send as rights. In exch. admin for 5.5sp4, I have set myself permissions to SendAs. On my outlook 2000 client, I have setup a PAB to accept the address used on the public folder (the folder email addresses are hidden from the GAL). When I go to properties on the public folder, I add address to my PAB (it does not do it) so I manually add the email address to the PAB but still no good. What the heck am I missing? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot
I do not use PAB except for the fact that according to info on slipstick.com, you need the PAB to accept an email address on a public folder if hidden in the GAL. I need to keep the email address hidden from the GAL. If there is a method otherwise, I am ears. I did try before I added the PAB and it still did not work. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot Well, first off, sending as a public folder has nothing to do with your PAB. Remove the entry from your PAB and then ask yourself "Why on earth am I still using this beast if I'm on Outlook 2000?". That settled, try unhiding the PF from the GAL. You should be able to send as that PF then. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot I have setup public folders with email addresses assigned to them. I wish to send mail as the public folder but when I try, it says cannot send due to send as rights. In exch. admin for 5.5sp4, I have set myself permissions to SendAs. On my outlook 2000 client, I have setup a PAB to accept the address used on the public folder (the folder email addresses are hidden from the GAL). When I go to properties on the public folder, I add address to my PAB (it does not do it) so I manually add the email address to the PAB but still no good. What the heck am I missing? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot
Well, first off, sending as a public folder has nothing to do with your PAB. Remove the entry from your PAB and then ask yourself "Why on earth am I still using this beast if I'm on Outlook 2000?". That settled, try unhiding the PF from the GAL. You should be able to send as that PF then. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot I have setup public folders with email addresses assigned to them. I wish to send mail as the public folder but when I try, it says cannot send due to send as rights. In exch. admin for 5.5sp4, I have set myself permissions to SendAs. On my outlook 2000 client, I have setup a PAB to accept the address used on the public folder (the folder email addresses are hidden from the GAL). When I go to properties on the public folder, I add address to my PAB (it does not do it) so I manually add the email address to the PAB but still no good. What the heck am I missing? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: host ureachable
Memorized all the good links. --Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: host ureachable Thanks man that chit was quick -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: host ureachable How to Telnet http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q153119 How to NSLookup http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q203204 --Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: host ureachable Does anyone know how to check a communications problem between two mail server. We have a client in japan that we cant send messages too. I have no problems sending to the rest of the world. If I recall there is a set of commands in telnet that I can type to check this sort of thing out. I also checked the queues in ims and it say host unreachable. If anyone can help i would appreciate it. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send mail from Public Folder - cannot
I have setup public folders with email addresses assigned to them. I wish to send mail as the public folder but when I try, it says cannot send due to send as rights. In exch. admin for 5.5sp4, I have set myself permissions to SendAs. On my outlook 2000 client, I have setup a PAB to accept the address used on the public folder (the folder email addresses are hidden from the GAL). When I go to properties on the public folder, I add address to my PAB (it does not do it) so I manually add the email address to the PAB but still no good. What the heck am I missing? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: host ureachable
try some trace routes from the mail servers (both ends) to see where it might be stopping at... -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: host ureachable Does anyone know how to check a communications problem between two mail server. We have a client in japan that we cant send messages too. I have no problems sending to the rest of the world. If I recall there is a set of commands in telnet that I can type to check this sort of thing out. I also checked the queues in ims and it say host unreachable. If anyone can help i would appreciate it. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: host ureachable
Thanks man that chit was quick -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: host ureachable How to Telnet http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q153119 How to NSLookup http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q203204 --Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: host ureachable Does anyone know how to check a communications problem between two mail server. We have a client in japan that we cant send messages too. I have no problems sending to the rest of the world. If I recall there is a set of commands in telnet that I can type to check this sort of thing out. I also checked the queues in ims and it say host unreachable. If anyone can help i would appreciate it. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: host ureachable
FAQ -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: host ureachable Does anyone know how to check a communications problem between two mail server. We have a client in japan that we cant send messages too. I have no problems sending to the rest of the world. If I recall there is a set of commands in telnet that I can type to check this sort of thing out. I also checked the queues in ims and it say host unreachable. If anyone can help i would appreciate it. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: host ureachable
How to Telnet http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q153119 How to NSLookup http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q203204 --Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: host ureachable Does anyone know how to check a communications problem between two mail server. We have a client in japan that we cant send messages too. I have no problems sending to the rest of the world. If I recall there is a set of commands in telnet that I can type to check this sort of thing out. I also checked the queues in ims and it say host unreachable. If anyone can help i would appreciate it. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
host ureachable
Does anyone know how to check a communications problem between two mail server. We have a client in japan that we cant send messages too. I have no problems sending to the rest of the world. If I recall there is a set of commands in telnet that I can type to check this sort of thing out. I also checked the queues in ims and it say host unreachable. If anyone can help i would appreciate it. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AD built-in groups on other servers
There's no PDC in Windows 2000/Active directory. One of the roles that's available in your domain is the PDC emulator role, but that's not the same. If you are asking "Why can't I use AD Users & Computers on my new server?" then the answer is: 1.) It's not a domain controller (dcpromo will fix this up for you) or 2.) You haven't set up the Terminal Services client on it, and set your server to do it. or 3.) You haven't installed the ADMINPAK.MSI on that server. Pick one. Administer righteously thereafter. > -Original Message- > From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:19 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: AD built-in groups on other servers > Subject: AD built-in groups on other servers > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I have setup another server and can not see the built-in > groups that are on the AD PDC. These are w2k machines. > What do I need to do so I can "see" the admin group, for > example, to set some sharing and security permissions? Or do > I have to setup a local admin group on the new server? > > > Jim Liddil M.S. > Lab/IT Manager > Phytoceutica Inc. > (203)781-2544 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAjyt6nwACgkQugWPsDOlFFKIOwCfc/6giydt6XkHRgWpst3Qx7+5 > fWAAn0EZZw6/n3H+r3JqBv9kRpqi1aCW > =+4q9 > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA attachments
I've hit the same problem but only after an upgrade to Exch2K. Worse, it doesn't seem to be a consistent problem, sometimes the user is prompted to save the attachment, but then gets an option to open it anyway. I found info from Microsoft that indicates a setting in "URLScan.ini" may fix this, but I haven't even applied URLScan to my newly-rebuilt box. So I'm unsure what else to do right this minute. David -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA attachments Sorry that didn't work. I'm fresh out of ideas. If you figure it out, please share. Now I'm curious. Louise -Original Message- From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA attachments This Q did not fix the problem. When using Outlook 2000 on this computer they do get prompted when opening an attachment to whether they want to open it or save it to disk. When OWA is used on this computer they do not get prompted. Only get save to disk. Any more ideas? Thanks, Jeff > -Original Message- > From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:54 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA attachments > > > Check out article Q177976 for those computers that don't get > the option. > > -Louise > > -Original Message- > From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OWA attachments > > > I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4 and have a problem with > some computers > opening attachments with OWA. On some computers when a person > clicks on the > attachment the dialog box asks them if they want to open it > or save it to > disk. On other computers it will only give the person a Save > As dialog box > and not give them the option to open it. This happens in both > Netscape and > IE. The only thing I found was Q195113 relating to Netscape > having this > problem. I checked the registry entries they list and they > are correct. Does > anyone know how I can get it to prompt to open the attachment. The > attachments are mainly Word and Excel. > > Thanks, > Jeff Petschow > College of DuPage > www.cod.edu > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA attachments
Sorry that didn't work. I'm fresh out of ideas. If you figure it out, please share. Now I'm curious. Louise -Original Message- From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA attachments This Q did not fix the problem. When using Outlook 2000 on this computer they do get prompted when opening an attachment to whether they want to open it or save it to disk. When OWA is used on this computer they do not get prompted. Only get save to disk. Any more ideas? Thanks, Jeff > -Original Message- > From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:54 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA attachments > > > Check out article Q177976 for those computers that don't get > the option. > > -Louise > > -Original Message- > From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OWA attachments > > > I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4 and have a problem with > some computers > opening attachments with OWA. On some computers when a person > clicks on the > attachment the dialog box asks them if they want to open it > or save it to > disk. On other computers it will only give the person a Save > As dialog box > and not give them the option to open it. This happens in both > Netscape and > IE. The only thing I found was Q195113 relating to Netscape > having this > problem. I checked the registry entries they list and they > are correct. Does > anyone know how I can get it to prompt to open the attachment. The > attachments are mainly Word and Excel. > > Thanks, > Jeff Petschow > College of DuPage > www.cod.edu > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA attachments
This Q did not fix the problem. When using Outlook 2000 on this computer they do get prompted when opening an attachment to whether they want to open it or save it to disk. When OWA is used on this computer they do not get prompted. Only get save to disk. Any more ideas? Thanks, Jeff > -Original Message- > From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:54 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA attachments > > > Check out article Q177976 for those computers that don't get > the option. > > -Louise > > -Original Message- > From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OWA attachments > > > I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4 and have a problem with > some computers > opening attachments with OWA. On some computers when a person > clicks on the > attachment the dialog box asks them if they want to open it > or save it to > disk. On other computers it will only give the person a Save > As dialog box > and not give them the option to open it. This happens in both > Netscape and > IE. The only thing I found was Q195113 relating to Netscape > having this > problem. I checked the registry entries they list and they > are correct. Does > anyone know how I can get it to prompt to open the attachment. The > attachments are mainly Word and Excel. > > Thanks, > Jeff Petschow > College of DuPage > www.cod.edu > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 to ADC Replication
Has anyone had any problems with getting all the exchnage objects replicated from Ex.5.5 to Active Directory? I've been able to replicate users and containers, but, having problems getting over the contacts "Custom recipients) and distrib. lists.. I've tried several times in modifiying the replication agreement in the ADC just to get the contacts & DL's from my recipients folder over to the AD. Nothing happens. Also, is there a way or tools to bring over the DL's properly in "mixed mode" ? Thanks Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA attachments
Thanks for the Q Louise. I will give a try. It looks like that may do it. Jeff > -Original Message- > From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:54 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA attachments > > > Check out article Q177976 for those computers that don't get > the option. > > -Louise > > -Original Message- > From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OWA attachments > > > I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4 and have a problem with > some computers > opening attachments with OWA. On some computers when a person > clicks on the > attachment the dialog box asks them if they want to open it > or save it to > disk. On other computers it will only give the person a Save > As dialog box > and not give them the option to open it. This happens in both > Netscape and > IE. The only thing I found was Q195113 relating to Netscape > having this > problem. I checked the registry entries they list and they > are correct. Does > anyone know how I can get it to prompt to open the attachment. The > attachments are mainly Word and Excel. > > Thanks, > Jeff Petschow > College of DuPage > www.cod.edu > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AD built-in groups on other servers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have setup another server and can not see the built-in groups that are on the AD PDC. These are w2k machines. What do I need to do so I can "see" the admin group, for example, to set some sharing and security permissions? Or do I have to setup a local admin group on the new server? Jim Liddil M.S. Lab/IT Manager Phytoceutica Inc. (203)781-2544 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjyt6nwACgkQugWPsDOlFFKIOwCfc/6giydt6XkHRgWpst3Qx7+5 fWAAn0EZZw6/n3H+r3JqBv9kRpqi1aCW =+4q9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA attachments
Check out article Q177976 for those computers that don't get the option. -Louise -Original Message- From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA attachments I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4 and have a problem with some computers opening attachments with OWA. On some computers when a person clicks on the attachment the dialog box asks them if they want to open it or save it to disk. On other computers it will only give the person a Save As dialog box and not give them the option to open it. This happens in both Netscape and IE. The only thing I found was Q195113 relating to Netscape having this problem. I checked the registry entries they list and they are correct. Does anyone know how I can get it to prompt to open the attachment. The attachments are mainly Word and Excel. Thanks, Jeff Petschow College of DuPage www.cod.edu _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recall: hello
Yes, Brain. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be not afraid of growing slowly, be afraid only of standing still. --Chinese Proverb -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Recall: hello Okay, Pink, settle down. - Original Message - From: "Newsgroups" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 6:50 PM Subject: RE: Recall: hello Yes you can! With 1010220 all call up to 20 minutes are just 0.99! -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:35 PM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Recall: hello Subject: RE: Recall: hello Ok it will cost you a dollar though.don't worry cause you can't buy nothing for a dollar anymore -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recall: hello Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB would like to recall the message, "hello". We attend to your needs by offering superior customer service with our call centre business continuity planning services. Check it out at http://www.onecall.com.my _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange in it's own Domain
Perception. It all comes down to perception. We were two companies that merged and management feels we are not "one" company until the computer network reflects our change. I could make a case about the Exchange box, because it is in a domain that describes the technology we develop. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange in it's own Domain What business need is driving this? While I've run separate "resource" domains for Exchange, it certainly doesn't make thinks easier. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:49 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange in it's own Domain > > > We are in the process of reorganizing our domain structure, > and basically I need to pull the Exchange 2000 box out of > it's existing 2000 domain and have it join a new one. Advice > was given to me from this list to copy all the mails to .pst > and reload Exchange, join the new domain and merge the mail > back in. I am desperately trying to avoid this. > > Is there any wisdom that says to have an Exchange box in a > separate domain as the rest of the users? I need some ammo > to recommend we leave the Exchange box where it is. The only > thing is I would have to have the Exchange computer be a DC > and have all the FSMO roles etc for a domain of one. > > > -- > Vincent Avallone > iBiquity Digital > (410) 872-1535 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange in it's own Domain
What business need is driving this? While I've run separate "resource" domains for Exchange, it certainly doesn't make thinks easier. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:49 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange in it's own Domain > > > We are in the process of reorganizing our domain structure, > and basically I need to pull the Exchange 2000 box out of > it's existing 2000 domain and have it join a new one. Advice > was given to me from this list to copy all the mails to .pst > and reload Exchange, join the new domain and merge the mail > back in. I am desperately trying to avoid this. > > Is there any wisdom that says to have an Exchange box in a > separate domain as the rest of the users? I need some ammo > to recommend we leave the Exchange box where it is. The only > thing is I would have to have the Exchange computer be a DC > and have all the FSMO roles etc for a domain of one. > > > -- > Vincent Avallone > iBiquity Digital > (410) 872-1535 > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA attachments
I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4 and have a problem with some computers opening attachments with OWA. On some computers when a person clicks on the attachment the dialog box asks them if they want to open it or save it to disk. On other computers it will only give the person a Save As dialog box and not give them the option to open it. This happens in both Netscape and IE. The only thing I found was Q195113 relating to Netscape having this problem. I checked the registry entries they list and they are correct. Does anyone know how I can get it to prompt to open the attachment. The attachments are mainly Word and Excel. Thanks, Jeff Petschow College of DuPage www.cod.edu _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange in it's own Domain
We are in the process of reorganizing our domain structure, and basically I need to pull the Exchange 2000 box out of it's existing 2000 domain and have it join a new one. Advice was given to me from this list to copy all the mails to .pst and reload Exchange, join the new domain and merge the mail back in. I am desperately trying to avoid this. Is there any wisdom that says to have an Exchange box in a separate domain as the rest of the users? I need some ammo to recommend we leave the Exchange box where it is. The only thing is I would have to have the Exchange computer be a DC and have all the FSMO roles etc for a domain of one. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Damaged PAB
I have never had much success with doing this except for the mail merge function. Nate > -- > From: Soysal, Serdar > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Friday, April 5, 2002 09:38 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Damaged PAB > > You can also try to open it in Word. It recognizes PAB files. > > > > Serdar Soysal > > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:16 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Damaged PAB > > > OK, Am I suffering from lack of sleep or do I seem to remember that you > could use scanpst.exe on a PAB? > > You may want to use this as a good reason to move away from PABs > > -Original Message- > From: T. Manning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 6:41 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Damaged PAB > > > OL2000 - Exch 5.5 w/ sp4 > > > PAB's are still widely used in my environment and I have never had any > problems, but recently I have had two user PABs that have become damaged > with error message "This personal address book is damaged and is no longer > usable." > > Anyone ever seen this or know of a util to repair? > > Thx! > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Problem Exch 5.5 sp4 with Win2k sp2 & AD (new to the list )
If they can see it via OWA, then dollars to doughnuts they can see it via Outlook too. I'll take a WAG and say that someone granted a group (the everyone group perhaps) receive as rights on the information store object. -- Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE MessageOne 512-652-4500 x244 "When the country falls into chaos, patriotism is born." --Tao Te Ching > -Original Message- > From: Steve Nash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 5:47 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OWA Problem Exch 5.5 sp4 with Win2k sp2 & AD (new to > the list) > > > I have a strange problem. I installed Exchange Server on a > Windows 2000 Server with Active Directory. When anyone uses > the the Web Access they can use their login name and see any > email box they want. > > Any suggestions on where to look? The bosses are having a > fit that anyone can see their e-mail from the Web Access. I > am sure it has something to do with permissions, but I am > very new to Windows 2000. > > Thanks, > Steve > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how many users per server
That's a trick question! Because if you used ArcServer2000, you are never certain if you even have a backup to restore! Or so I've heard... -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: how many users per server I guess that qualifies as a BLB .. unless you use ArcServe 2000. If you use that to back the server up .. what software do you use to restore it? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:20 PM Subject: RE: how many users per server > I have a user in Florida on her own server. Am I actually running a > brick-level backup then? > > > -Original Message- > From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 1:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: how many users per server > > > That's for Exchange 5.5. In Exchange 2000 you can go all the way up to 93. > > Serdar Soysal > > > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: how many users per server > > > Otherwise its 42. > > > -Original Message- > From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:14 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: how many users per server > > > There are some sizing and deployment calculators and white papers here: > http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/planning/2000/default.asp > > > > -Ben- > Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 > Director of Information Services > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:11 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: how many users per server > > > > > > does anybody know if there are any specs as to how many users > > can go on a server? I know it all depends on ram/hard > > disk/etc.. but as a guideline. > > this is for exchange 5.5 and exchange 2000 > > > > Thanks > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- -- > -- > The information contained in this email message is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > > == > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting
RE: Damaged PAB
Yes, my thought exactly... but I have already tried scanpst and it 'appears' to have repaired, but still no luck! Still cannot access -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Damaged PAB OK, Am I suffering from lack of sleep or do I seem to remember that you could use scanpst.exe on a PAB? You may want to use this as a good reason to move away from PABs -Original Message- From: T. Manning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Damaged PAB OL2000 - Exch 5.5 w/ sp4 PAB's are still widely used in my environment and I have never had any problems, but recently I have had two user PABs that have become damaged with error message "This personal address book is damaged and is no longer usable." Anyone ever seen this or know of a util to repair? Thx! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Gowlings immediately by email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000
Also, does it happen if that person logs in to a different PC? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Thomas, You haven't answered Erik's question about custom forms. I have some more for you: - Does this happen with every message or just a specific one? - Has anyone, or the clients themselves, been experimenting with manipulating commandbar objects in Outlook? - Did anything specific happen prior to the start of this problem? Also, please quit snipping the thread when you're replying. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 I've been trying but I cannot connect. The greyed out "reply" buttons - is this when the message is displayed in the previerw pane or when the message is opened up in its own window? Is it possibly a custom form? - Q221954/Q208346 > -Original Message- > From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook 2000 > > > I have a user that can't reply on thier email. What happens > is that when > they get thier mail and they wanted to reply to it , they > can't. There are > no reply or reply to all, infact thier bar is completly gray. > any ideas i > would appreciate it. > > Thank you > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000
Thomas, You haven't answered Erik's question about custom forms. I have some more for you: - Does this happen with every message or just a specific one? - Has anyone, or the clients themselves, been experimenting with manipulating commandbar objects in Outlook? - Did anything specific happen prior to the start of this problem? Also, please quit snipping the thread when you're replying. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 I've been trying but I cannot connect. The greyed out "reply" buttons - is this when the message is displayed in the previerw pane or when the message is opened up in its own window? Is it possibly a custom form? - Q221954/Q208346 > -Original Message- > From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook 2000 > > > I have a user that can't reply on thier email. What happens > is that when > they get thier mail and they wanted to reply to it , they > can't. There are > no reply or reply to all, infact thier bar is completly gray. > any ideas i > would appreciate it. > > Thank you > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Damaged PAB
You can also try to open it in Word. It recognizes PAB files. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Damaged PAB OK, Am I suffering from lack of sleep or do I seem to remember that you could use scanpst.exe on a PAB? You may want to use this as a good reason to move away from PABs -Original Message- From: T. Manning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Damaged PAB OL2000 - Exch 5.5 w/ sp4 PAB's are still widely used in my environment and I have never had any problems, but recently I have had two user PABs that have become damaged with error message "This personal address book is damaged and is no longer usable." Anyone ever seen this or know of a util to repair? Thx! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000
it is outlook 2000 and it is an liscensed copy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Damaged PAB
OK, Am I suffering from lack of sleep or do I seem to remember that you could use scanpst.exe on a PAB? You may want to use this as a good reason to move away from PABs -Original Message- From: T. Manning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Damaged PAB OL2000 - Exch 5.5 w/ sp4 PAB's are still widely used in my environment and I have never had any problems, but recently I have had two user PABs that have become damaged with error message "This personal address book is damaged and is no longer usable." Anyone ever seen this or know of a util to repair? Thx! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000
By any chance is this person using outlook 2002 not 2000. In 2002 they will give you a trial version until you enter the serail #. I think the trial is for 40 days and after the 40 days the reply button will not work but you will be able to read email. Double check to see what version you have./ Rich -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 I've been trying but I cannot connect. The greyed out "reply" buttons - is this when the message is displayed in the previerw pane or when the message is opened up in its own window? Is it possibly a custom form? - Q221954/Q208346 > -Original Message- > From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook 2000 > > > I have a user that can't reply on thier email. What happens > is that when > they get thier mail and they wanted to reply to it , they > can't. There are > no reply or reply to all, infact thier bar is completly gray. > any ideas i > would appreciate it. > > Thank you > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000
It happens in its own window . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000
I've been trying but I cannot connect. The greyed out "reply" buttons - is this when the message is displayed in the previerw pane or when the message is opened up in its own window? Is it possibly a custom form? - Q221954/Q208346 > -Original Message- > From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook 2000 > > > I have a user that can't reply on thier email. What happens > is that when > they get thier mail and they wanted to reply to it , they > can't. There are > no reply or reply to all, infact thier bar is completly gray. > any ideas i > would appreciate it. > > Thank you > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Damaged PAB
I thought at first it said "Damaged PHB". I was going to reply "What else is new?" > -Original Message- > From: T. Manning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:41 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Damaged PAB > > > OL2000 - Exch 5.5 w/ sp4 > > > PAB's are still widely used in my environment and I have never had any > problems, but recently I have had two user PABs that have > become damaged > with error message "This personal address book is damaged and > is no longer > usable." > > Anyone ever seen this or know of a util to repair? > > Thx! > > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Requesting Data errors with SAN and Large Mailboxs
We had similar problems with our SAN after adding some new disks and assigning these to a separate non-exchange server - outlook started giving lots of 'requesting data from server' messages and other apps using the SAN for data storage also suffered poor performance. A complete shutdown and restart of the SAN cured everything. A little worrying, but that was six months ago and all is well and good since Dan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Damaged PAB
OL2000 - Exch 5.5 w/ sp4 PAB's are still widely used in my environment and I have never had any problems, but recently I have had two user PABs that have become damaged with error message "This personal address book is damaged and is no longer usable." Anyone ever seen this or know of a util to repair? Thx! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
owa 2002 error
Server Exchange 2000 SP2 I created a new http virtual directory. Everything is ok but log off button. But, when I use the log off button I've got this error : http://mail.server.com/exchweb/bin/USA/logoff.asp error Server Application Error The server has encountered an error while loading an application during the processing of your request. Please refer to the event log for more detail information. Please contact the server administrator for assistance. Is there some special configuration when we create a new http vitual server ? thanks F _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how many users per server
.ten > -Original Message- > From: William E. Grever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 5:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: how many users per server > > > Any idea what it will be for the .net version? > > -Original Message- > From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 5:17 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: how many users per server > > For exchange 5.5 its 5 1/2 > and for exchange 2000 its 2000 > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 5:00 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: how many users per server > > > I was talking about Enterprise version. > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 1:59 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: how many users per server > > > No no it's 3.14159 > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Martin Blackstone > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 1:56 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: how many users per server > > > 10 > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 1:11 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: how many users per server > > > does anybody know if there are any specs as to how many users > can go on a > server? I know it all depends on ram/hard disk/etc.. but as > a guideline. > this is for exchange 5.5 and exchange 2000 > > Thanks > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: hello
Hey luv, Your disclaimer sounds like a cut & paste from a Dilbert strip. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 7:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: hello Good Day dear. ;- Take care Cheers Carine We attend to your needs by offering superior customer service with our call centre business continuity planning services. Check it out at http://www.onecall.com.my _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to migrate from I-Mail to Exchange 2000 server
I don't believe it can be done, but I'd start by looking at CompuSven. It will cost you, though.. http://www.compusven.com/products/shuttle.html -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Marian Mounir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 2:15 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: How to migrate from I-Mail to Exchange 2000 server > > > I am trying to change my email server from I-Mail to Exchange > 2000 ,,can any body tell me how to export my domains with > there user's form I-Mail without losing passwords. > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Requesting Data errors with SAN and Large Mailboxs
Restore your last good backup to your recovery server and run eseutil against the restored copy. You're checking to see if there is any corruption out in the file. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Jim Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 5:32 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Requesting Data errors with SAN and Large Mailboxs > > > Running Exch55, Sp4, NT4, Sp5 with IS located on SAN Shark > (Compaq Fiber > Card). Running TrendServerProtect and TrendScanMail. A certain user > is getting a lot of latency/delays (requesting data from > Microsoft Exchange dialog box, etc) when accessing his > mailbox in Outlook (XP). Not a network issue, as he's tried > this from multiple PC's, laptops (wireless), etc . same > errors periodically. Plenty of free space on the IS/LOG > drives. No errors in the event logs. He wasn't having these > problems before we switched to the SAN (Compaq RAID5 before). > One caveat . this user has a 240MB mailbox with 150,000 - > 200,000 messages in it . so many, it's only reading as 0 messages. > > One other user (out of 250 on the server) has complained > also. This user has a 3.5GB mailbox, but only 65,000 > messages in it. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > > Jim > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Against the Topic
Dear List, Recently i have seen 2 groups created in my active directory, named _Web Appliation & _Web Anonymous User, IWAM_Machine_Name is the member in both group, which are not created by me. can someone tell how these groups created. the only change i did was i upgraded my isa server to a firewall mode. Thanks in Advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Requesting Data errors with SAN and Large Mailboxs
Awesome information. Thanks for taking time to give some very helpful details ... appreciate the tips. Will check the KB article out and will follow from there. Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Requesting Data errors with SAN and Large Mailboxs Perfmon should also reveal whether the SAN is somehow slowing things down. I know a SAN is supposed to be faster but that can depend on how it was configured in the first place. I've seen a SAN being demoed that was significantly slower than it should have been. After tuning the block sizes to more closely reflect the expected block sizes being written (the demo used Exchange and this is a known size) the performance problems disappeared. Or rather was alleviated; there were some extraneous factors that prevented the demo from giving a good result (not important at this time). Bottom line is that to achieve high performance with a SAN requires more than plugging it in and turning it on. There is a KB article on selecting block size according to size of disks and number of spindles that as I recall translates nicely to SAN configuration. There are numerous objects under Object:PhysicalDisk that, in aggregate, can give a very good idea of how the disk storage subsystem is performing. If I were to choose one as a starting point it would be Current Disk Queue Length. The Explain button for this says: "Current Disk Queue Length is the number of requests outstanding on the disk at the time the performance data is collected. It also includes requests in service at the time of the collection. This is a instantaneous snapshot, not an average over the time interval. Multi-spindle disk devices can have multiple requests that are active at one time, but other concurrent requests are awaiting service. This counter might reflect a transitory high or low queue length, but if there is a sustained load on the disk drive, it is likely that this will be consistently high. Requests experience delays proportional to the length of this queue minus the number of spindles on the disks. For good performance, this difference should average less than two. If this number were to stay high, or be on a ramp-up that never goes back down, this would indicate the disk subsystem is falling behind on servicing read/write requests (the above represents both). From here there are other counters that could be observed in order to narrow down where the slowdown is occuring. As to your other point about all the mail being elsewhere besides in the inbox. When a mailbox opens the root folder is enumerated - a large number of folders in the root would be a slowdown. Then the inbox is enumerated; ditto for a large number of messages. Then rules are fired and here is where other folders could be touched and thus enumerated. This could make for a very slow startup for Outlook. After startup the user might drag a message with the mouse to a folder; that folder gets enumerated if it hasn't already, same if a rule fires. A new message sent would write to the Sent Items folder, enumeration again. A deleted message is sent to the Deleted Items folder and, again, more enumeration. I trust that answers your question on that score. - Original Message - From: "Jim Brady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:22 PM Subject: RE: Requesting Data errors with SAN and Large Mailboxs > Thanks for the insight/understanding. I'll give perfmon a shot, and > check slipstick for some possible solutions. > > One thing ... if this started happening right after we switched to the > SAN, then I must conclude that SAN technology may not be able handle > large mailbox enumerations, etc ... agreed? But a SAN is supposed to > outperform a SCSI Raid, right? > > Also, if the user has no emails in his inbox folder (they're all in > another folder in the mailbox) ... that's not going to make a > difference, right? ... didn't think so. > > Thanks again ... Jim > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel > Chenault > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 7:54 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Requesting Data errors with SAN and Large Mailboxs > > I'm betting these users have tons of folders or, just as bad, a small > number > of folders with lots of messages in them. > > When a user accesses the root of his mailbox the folders in the root > level > are enumerated by the server and passed back to the client. As each > folder > is accessed (either by clicking on it, by a rule or by dragging a > message to > it) the contents of that folder are enumerated by the server and passed > back > to the client. This... takes... time... for... lots... of... messages... > or... folders. The user sees a definite slowdown and in OutlookXP will > get > the po
RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
I have a similar situation to this. I need to move (migrate) users from a 5,5 server to a 2000 server. It is a 24 hour operation though I can afford some downtime in email, the 5.5 server is 1000Kms away on a wan, the new servers are installed and awaiting users to be migrated. What is the procedure for this? Old Domain is a WinNT 4.0 domain with a PDC & a BDC, PDC is Mail & File server, BDC is File server. Damien On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 16:16, Rowell, John (AFIT) wrote: > By the way, when moving a mailbox, do any of you ever check first to see > whether the user is logged in ?? I always do (which greatly slows the > moving of mailboxes) because in the past I've noticed that users that get > moved, while being logged in, leave bad records in the database so that they > then appear in the information store of both servers! It doesn't seem to > create any problems, but it makes me uneasy to see a mailbox appear that > way. > > I agree that the forklift method does take your garbage along with you. If > I have a database with minor corruptions, then I would definitely go for the > move mailbox. > > > -Original Message- > > From: CHRIS H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 04 April 2002 20:59 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Re: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware > > > > > > I just finished doing the exact same thing and the only thing > > I didnt like about the "forklift" method of moving my > > mailboxes is that I was bringing my old database along for > > the ride. I did the move mailbox procedure, for about 250 > > mailboxes and it took me 3 Sundays. I just terminal servered > > into the server at 12 midnight Saturday and let it chug along > > until Midnight Sunday. Worked great. > > > > "You cannot create experience. You must undergo it." > > Albert Camus (1913-1960); French writer and philosopher > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Rowell, John (AFIT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 2:52 AM > > Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware > > > > > > > No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my > > organization and > > > so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the > > > mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive. That > > does not give > > > a lot of > > time > > > to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some > > > time. > > Try > > > moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each and I > > think you'll > > > find it takes longer than a backup and restore. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57 > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a > > Friday and > > > > Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and > > > > actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of > > > > minutes. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Over 500. > > > > > > > > > > Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12 > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very > > > > effective, I would > > > > > > not discount the backup and restore method, where you do > > > > the whole > > > > > > move within one day. I've used the Ed Crawley Server Move > > > > > > method and it works fine, but the downside is that it > > can take > > > > > > months to move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of > > them, and if > > > > they are big. > > > > > > As a result, recently I used the server move method, and > > > > had great > > > > > > success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner. I > > > > > > wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to > > > > back out of > > > > > > it. > > > > > > There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup & > > > > > > restore, ii) using off-line backup & restore, and I found the > > > > > > latter easier. > > > > > > > >
