RE: Email not working b/n 2 Exchange 2000 servers

[Julian Stone]

If all users have the same SMTP address (@skilled.com.au) and you
haven't set each default recipient policy to be non-authoratative with
an appropriate connector to the other server, then you will end up with
the mail loop condition you are seeing.

Yours,

Julian Stone


-Original Message-
From: Duane Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 07 May 2002 06:55 am
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email not working b/n 2 Exchange 2000 servers


Both Exchange servers are domain controllers for the same domain.  I
have not setup any extra recipient policies other than what was created
when Exchange was installed.  The "default policy" has 2 addresses
ticked.

SMTP@skilled.com.au
X400c=AU,a:= ;p=Skilled Engineer;o=Victoria

I have looked at Q288175/Q284204 which is a close but not exact match. 
Eg,
 - Numerical Code: 5.4.8
  First Available: Exchange 2000 Service Pack 1
  Possible Cause: Warning of a looping condition. One known case is that
one of
  the recipient policies includes a local domain that matches the FQDN
of an
  Exchange server in the organization. When the Transport Categorizer is
  processing mail destined for a domain that matches a Exchange Server's
FQDN,
  it will return NDR the message with this error.
  Troubleshooting: If it was caused by having an Exchange server's FQDN
in the
  recipient policy, you must remove that entry.



-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, 7 May 2002 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email not working b/n 2 Exchange 2000 servers


What is your configuration ? 

Are both servers in the same forest\domain ?

What email addresses are being set in the recipient policies ?

Yours,

Julian Stone
Exchange 2000 Consultant

Netstore - Europe's Leading Application Service Provider

Tel:+44 (0) 1344 444349
Mobile: +44 (0) 7710 122 312
Fax:+44 (0) 207 681 1238
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

LOCATION: http://www.netstore.net/contact/location.htm
HomePage: http://www.netstore.net/



-Original Message-
From: Duane Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 07 May 2002 01:54 am
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email not working b/n 2 Exchange 2000 servers


I am having a problem sending email between our 2 Exchange 2000 SP2
servers.  Email sends fine from server A > server B BUT not server B >
A.  Gets below NDR.  I have checked TechNet and found nothing that seems
to match my configuration.  Any ideas?

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  
  Sent: 7/05/2002 10:10 AM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Administrator (dc1) on 7/05/2002 10:10 AM
A configuration error in the e-mail system caused the
message to bounce between two servers or to be forwarded between two
recipients.  Contact your administrator.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Email not working b/n 2 Exchange 2000 servers

[Duane Purcell]

Both Exchange servers are domain controllers for the same domain.  I
have not setup any extra recipient policies other than what was created
when Exchange was installed.  The "default policy" has 2 addresses
ticked.

SMTP@skilled.com.au
X400c=AU,a:= ;p=Skilled Engineer;o=Victoria

I have looked at Q288175/Q284204 which is a close but not exact match. 
Eg,
 - Numerical Code: 5.4.8
  First Available: Exchange 2000 Service Pack 1
  Possible Cause: Warning of a looping condition. One known case is that
one of
  the recipient policies includes a local domain that matches the FQDN
of an
  Exchange server in the organization. When the Transport Categorizer is
  processing mail destined for a domain that matches a Exchange Server's
FQDN,
  it will return NDR the message with this error.
  Troubleshooting: If it was caused by having an Exchange server's FQDN
in the
  recipient policy, you must remove that entry.



-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, 7 May 2002 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email not working b/n 2 Exchange 2000 servers


What is your configuration ? 

Are both servers in the same forest\domain ?

What email addresses are being set in the recipient policies ?

Yours,

Julian Stone
Exchange 2000 Consultant

Netstore - Europe's Leading Application Service Provider

Tel:+44 (0) 1344 444349
Mobile: +44 (0) 7710 122 312
Fax:+44 (0) 207 681 1238
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

LOCATION: http://www.netstore.net/contact/location.htm
HomePage: http://www.netstore.net/



-Original Message-
From: Duane Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 07 May 2002 01:54 am
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email not working b/n 2 Exchange 2000 servers


I am having a problem sending email between our 2 Exchange 2000 SP2
servers.  Email sends fine from server A > server B BUT not server B >
A.  Gets below NDR.  I have checked TechNet and found nothing that seems
to match my configuration.  Any ideas?

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  
  Sent: 7/05/2002 10:10 AM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Administrator (dc1) on 7/05/2002 10:10 AM
A configuration error in the e-mail system caused the
message to bounce between two servers or to be forwarded between two
recipients.  Contact your administrator.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Email not working b/n 2 Exchange 2000 servers

[Julian Stone]

What is your configuration ? 

Are both servers in the same forest\domain ?

What email addresses are being set in the recipient policies ?

Yours,

Julian Stone
Exchange 2000 Consultant

Netstore - Europe's Leading Application Service Provider

Tel:+44 (0) 1344 444349
Mobile: +44 (0) 7710 122 312
Fax:+44 (0) 207 681 1238
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

LOCATION: http://www.netstore.net/contact/location.htm
HomePage: http://www.netstore.net/



-Original Message-
From: Duane Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 07 May 2002 01:54 am
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email not working b/n 2 Exchange 2000 servers


I am having a problem sending email between our 2 Exchange 2000 SP2
servers.  Email sends fine from server A > server B BUT not server B >
A.  Gets below NDR.  I have checked TechNet and found nothing that seems
to match my configuration.  Any ideas?

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  
  Sent: 7/05/2002 10:10 AM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Administrator (dc1) on 7/05/2002 10:10 AM
A configuration error in the e-mail system caused the
message to bounce between two servers or to be forwarded between two
recipients.  Contact your administrator.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Old Exchange Client (was RE: Best way to clean up corrupt calendar folder?)

[Yarbrough, David]

Where does one find the 'old Exchange Client'?  I remember using it
back-in-the-day but where does one find it these days?



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Best way to clean up corrupt calendar folder? (on server)


This is when the old Exchange Client comes in handy. You could have
exported the calendar to a PST and then deleted the calendar folder. The
next time you started OL, one would have been created.

It also sounds like you need the CDO hotfix for Exchange. BB support
should be able to help with that.

-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Best way to clean up corrupt calendar folder? (on server)


I had one user who could not syncronize her calendar over the air with
her blackberry.  The errors in the event log basically said that the CDO
stuff could not access the calendar.  Email was forwarding just fine.
After trying all sorts of things on the blackberry server, I finally
created a new mailbox (with a different username) and synced the
blackberry up with that (the calendar worked fine).

I then exported everything from the user's mailbox to a PST file (so I
could delete the mailbox and create a new one just like it).  After
exporting all the mailbox contents I tried deleting everything from the
calendar folder (by using view by category and deleting everything).
After doing only that (i.e. not yet creating a new mailbox) the
blackberry still would not sync with the calendar (over the air).  The
calendar appeared completely empty from an outlook 2000 client.  When I
tried via OWA there was an appointment still showing up in the calendar
(yikes).  

After deleting the mailbox and creating a new one with the same alias
and email address, the old data was imported from the PST and the
blackberry syncs up fine now.

My only question was if there was some better way of fixing the calendar
short of what I did.  I had tried all of the /cleanfreebusy
/cleanreminder /cleanshedplus options in outlook with no improvement.

Tom

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can't move multiple message within Outlook??

[Valerie Smith]

Exchange 5.5 SP4
Lately multiple Outlook 2000 clients have called that they are not able to
move multiple messages within their mailboxes or to public folders.  I
have confirmed that it is indeed a problem.  It seems that any message
with an attachment, big or small, can only be moved one at a time. Trying
to move two or more messages with attachments fails. Messages without
attachments do not seem to be having a problem.  Furthermore, when I tried
to move messges by archiving the folder, archiving failed with a message
that said it was unable to move them.  I used to be able to grap every
message in a folder and move it without a problem.

1. Has anyone else experienced this, and do you have a solution?
2. Could it be that my the virus software is trying to scan these messages
with attachments and is causing the failure?  I am using Groupshield for
Exchange.  I have been using this for several years, and this problem
never before existed.  I am going to follow up with them as well.
3. Could any of the latest MS security patches be causing this type of
problem?
Any help is appreciated
Thank You, Valerie



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley

[William Lefkovics]

You will find him in the Exchange2000 group ay yahoogroups.com.

Otherwise, he is still around.

William

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chinnery Paul
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: totally OT:Ed Crowley


Does anybody know what happened to Ed Crowley?  It just hit me that I
haven't seen any posts from him for a long time.

Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Email Archiving

[Christian Schlosser]

Hi all,

The company I work for has recently decided to look at a message archiving
solution for the crazy amount of email being stored.

We're currently running Exchange 5.5 Server, Exchange client 5 with about
8000 mailboxes. The solutions we're looking at are Enterprise Vault from
KVS, Archive One from C2C and eCon from Ixos. We have a shiny new IBM Shark
that isn't being used very much right now. We're eyeing it up for email
storage.

I was wondering if any of you had any advice / opinions / experiences /
praise / horror stories for any of these products, or any other archiving
solution.

Thanks!
-Christian


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

deleting mailboxes

[Fredd Krueger]

After I delete a mailbox with the ADU&G tool, it still shows up in System 
Manager under SERVERS\server_name\first storage group\mailbox 
store\mailboxes.  There's an option to "Purge" the mailbox but I have a lot 
to delete.  How can I delete all the mailboxes easily?

TIA for any suggestions.



_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange 5.5 Port 110 binding only to local host

[Fred Macondray]

Hi All,

I've got an exchange 5.5 server that has port 110
listening only on 127.0.0.1.  How can I change the
binding of the port to listen on the system's primary
IP?

Thanks in advance,
Fred


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

5.5 Server Scripting

[dstrausbaugh]

I want to create a server script for a public folder that will move read
messages from one folder to another.

Can anyone offer assistance?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Public folders vanish when moved

[Leo]

I have an Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000 server in the same
organisation/site.

I am trying to replicate the Exchange 5.5 folders over to the Exchange
2000 server.

I add the exchange 2000 server to the "replicate to" section of the
replicas tab in Exchange 5.5 admin program.

When I set the E5.5 public folder to replicate to the Exchange 2000 server
all appears to go well but it does not appear in Exchange system manager
under public folders ??

If I take it one step further and then remove/rehome that public folder
onto the Exchange 2000 server by removing the exchange 5.5 server name
from the "replicate to" field I then loose sight of the public folder
completely

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Regards
Leo

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 2000 and MS Mail

[Murray Alexander]

- Original Message -
From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 7:15 AM
> The client definitely wants to implement dir sync, and we're going
> to rearchitect it so that the Exchange server becomes the dirsync
> server and that the 4 MS Mail PO's are requestors.  Eventually, all
> sites will be W2K/Ex2K but not for a bit...

Good decision on the DirSync Server. That'll let you put each postoffice in
a separate container, if you wish. That's what we did. I thought it was a
Good Idea at the time, but now I'm not so sure it was as necessary as I
thought.

If you haven't though of it, don't use the "Automatic Post-Office Creation"
feature to set up your external postoffice routing definitions on your MS
Mail POs. That'll work only if you have one MS Mail PO as a "hub", with
other POs AND the Exchange Server as "spokes". With only 4 POs, you could
probably set them up manually without getting confused or bored.

Good luck. Let us know how much fun you have...



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Email not working b/n 2 Exchange 2000 servers

[Duane Purcell]

I am having a problem sending email between our 2 Exchange 2000 SP2
servers.  Email sends fine from server A > server B BUT not server B >
A.  Gets below NDR.  I have checked TechNet and found nothing that seems
to match my configuration.  Any ideas?

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

  Subject:  
  Sent: 7/05/2002 10:10 AM

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

  Administrator (dc1) on 7/05/2002 10:10 AM
A configuration error in the e-mail system caused the
message to bounce between two servers or to be forwarded between two
recipients.  Contact your administrator.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

WMI Error

[Bryon Barkley]

WIN2K (SP1) E2K:

I am getting WMI errors when trying to access the monitoring tab while
using the ESM, which is preventing me from to add different services to
monitor.  It's not on every server just some and not all from the same
site.  The WMI services are running on all servers.

The error is telling me, "You will not be able to see the current status
of the monitored resources and can not add disk or service monitoring
resources."  Gives me the following ID no: c1038692, Exchange System
Manager.

Anyone seen this before?  And of course, searching technet, proved
fruitless.

Thanks all!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.

[Chris Scharff]

If it were me, I'd start creating all new users in the default recipients
container and use restricted address book views and standard ABVs to mimic
what containers give you now. I'd stop transferring users between containers
ever until we were ready to move to E2K where the become irrelevant.
Unless your boss is good with the additional hardware requirements and costs
that exmerge (or a similar 3rd party tool) is going to involve.

> -Original Message-
> From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 5:11 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.
> 
> 
> Chris,
> 
> Currently all of our _wonderful_ users depend on the 
> containers to help them figure out who's at a center or to 
> send email to everyone at that center and we do not use 
> address book views at this time.  We have a high transfer 
> rate here and every time some moves from one center to 
> another I have to move that mailbox.  Also we're 62 centers 
> strong and are looking at adding 30 more centers before the 
> end of this year.  The container's are a pain right now and 
> will become a nightmare by the end of the year. 
> Also, my boss doesn't like it and I have to give him what he 
> wants  I just wish his previous staff set it up correctly.
> 
> Now, if we drill everyone down to the root anytime I have a 
> new user hire or a transfer I just need to change the 
> information in their profile and can manage all the mailbox 
> resources via an address book view instead of hard moves and 
> complicated scripting.
> 
> 
> > Question: Why do you need to move the users to a single container?
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:52 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Chris and Martin,
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the information. *sigh* My manager's going to hate
> > > me. But that's what a test lab is for right?
> > > 
> > > As for E2K,
> > > 
> > > I've yet to really look at it as a possabiliy so my first
> > > question is...
> > > 
> > > Can I run E2K is it own domain with a DC blah blah blah...
> > > Leaving my current NT 4 domain intact and setup a trust 
> > > between the 2 domains, add the E2K server to my current site 
> > > and move all the users to it?
> > > 
> > > We're not quite ready to move to 2000 yet so I need to work
> > > between the lines.
> > > 
> > > > Upgrade to E2K.
> > > > 
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: David Gibbons 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:38 PM
> > > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > > Subject: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > To All:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Current environment
> > > > > 
> > > > > Test Lab Server 1
> > > > > Compaq r3000
> > > > > 2 PII 333
> > > > > 1.5gig Ram
> > > > > 1x 4.1gig OS mirror
> > > > > 1x 9.1gig Log mirror
> > > > > 4x 18.1gig Information Store Raid 5
> > > > > Windows NT 4sp6
> > > > > Exchange 5.5sp4
> > > > > Information Store Size 33.2gig (Single Instance) 51gig 
> > > > > uncompressed. 768 mailboxes in information store Container 
> > > > > Scheme Container for each location e.g.  -Center Location 1
> > > > > --User  --User  --ETC  -Center Location 2  --User  
> --User  --Etc
> > > > > 
> > > > > Test Lab Server 2
> > > > > Compaq ML530
> > > > > 2 PIII Xoen 1gig
> > > > > 2gig Ram
> > > > > 1x 18.1gig OS Mirror
> > > > > 1x 18.1gig Log Mirror
> > > > > 4x 36gig Information Store Raid 5
> > > > > Windows 2000sp2
> > > > > Exchange 5.5sp4
> > > > > 
> > > > > We wish to use Ed's server move method to replace the current 
> > > > > hardware that our exchange server is sitting.  We 
> also wish to 
> > > > > move all user out of there current containers and set them in 
> > > > > the root of the exchange server and use address book 
> views for 
> > > > > our GAL(ie the right way)  Within Ed's server move 
> method I can 
> > > > > use the server to server move and not lose single 
> instance store 
> > > > > (according to Microsoft Q white papers) with all email on the 
> > > > > old server and retain my 33.2gig database on the new 
> server.  As 
> > > > > soon as I use Bind view or exmerge to get all the 
> mailboxes out 
> > > > > of there containers and into the root I lose single instance 
> > > > > store and have a 50gig database on the new server.  
> Does anyone 
> > > > > know how to move mailboxes out of their containers 
> and into the 
> > > > > root without having to use a .pst and losing single instance 
> > > > > storage?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > David Gibbons
> > > > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > > > Caliber Collision Centers
> > > > > 949-283-7593
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> _
> > > > > List posting FAQ:   
> http://ww

RE: Cerification question

[Christopher Hummert]

Do you have the link to sign up for that list?
-Chris

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Almeida
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 3:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question




On the other side, on the Red Hat certification list there is a lot of
activity...



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier
Sent: segunda-feira, 6 de Maio de 2002 22:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question

They're all trying to fix their broken networks, and it's taking them
awhile.  That isn't part of the core curriculum, unfortunately.


> -Original Message-
> From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Monday, May 06, 2002 04:50 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: Cerification question
> Subject: RE: Cerification question
> 
> 
> There is a list just for MCSE and another for MCSD. I'm
> subscribed to both, but there hasn't been any post in the 
> last 2 months ;)
> 
> Filipe Joel de Almeida
> Network Consultant
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mobile: +351 967819600
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Chris Scharff
> Sent: segunda-feira, 6 de Maio de 2002 14:59
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Cerification question
> 
> Isn't there a swynk list dedicated to certification banter?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:27 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Cerification question
> > 
> > 
> > Why do we go through this every three to six months?
> > 
> > William
> > 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.

[David Gibbons]

Chris,

Currently all of our _wonderful_ users depend on the containers to help
them figure out who's at a center or to send email to everyone at that
center and we do not use address book views at this time.  We have a high
transfer rate here and every time some moves from one center to another I
have to move that mailbox.  Also we're 62 centers strong and are looking
at adding 30 more centers before the end of this year.  The container's
are a pain right now and will become a nightmare by the end of the year. 
Also, my boss doesn't like it and I have to give him what he wants  I
just wish his previous staff set it up correctly.

Now, if we drill everyone down to the root anytime I have a new user hire
or a transfer I just need to change the information in their profile and
can manage all the mailbox resources via an address book view instead of
hard moves and complicated scripting.


> Question: Why do you need to move the users to a single container?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:52 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.
> > 
> > 
> > Chris and Martin,
> > 
> > Thanks for the information. *sigh* My manager's going to hate 
> > me. But that's what a test lab is for right?
> > 
> > As for E2K,
> > 
> > I've yet to really look at it as a possabiliy so my first 
> > question is...
> > 
> > Can I run E2K is it own domain with a DC blah blah blah...  
> > Leaving my current NT 4 domain intact and setup a trust 
> > between the 2 domains, add the E2K server to my current site 
> > and move all the users to it?
> > 
> > We're not quite ready to move to 2000 yet so I need to work 
> > between the lines.
> > 
> > > Upgrade to E2K.
> > > 
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:38 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > To All:
> > > > 
> > > > Current environment
> > > > 
> > > > Test Lab Server 1
> > > > Compaq r3000
> > > > 2 PII 333
> > > > 1.5gig Ram
> > > > 1x 4.1gig OS mirror
> > > > 1x 9.1gig Log mirror
> > > > 4x 18.1gig Information Store Raid 5
> > > > Windows NT 4sp6
> > > > Exchange 5.5sp4
> > > > Information Store Size 33.2gig (Single Instance) 51gig
> > > > uncompressed. 768 mailboxes in information store Container 
> > > > Scheme Container for each location e.g.  -Center Location 1  
> > > > --User  --User  --ETC  -Center Location 2  --User  --User  --Etc
> > > > 
> > > > Test Lab Server 2
> > > > Compaq ML530
> > > > 2 PIII Xoen 1gig
> > > > 2gig Ram
> > > > 1x 18.1gig OS Mirror
> > > > 1x 18.1gig Log Mirror
> > > > 4x 36gig Information Store Raid 5
> > > > Windows 2000sp2
> > > > Exchange 5.5sp4
> > > > 
> > > > We wish to use Ed's server move method to replace the current
> > > > hardware that our exchange server is sitting.  We also wish 
> > > > to move all user out of there current containers and set them 
> > > > in the root of the exchange server and use address book views 
> > > > for our GAL(ie the right way)  Within Ed's server move method 
> > > > I can use the server to server move and not lose single 
> > > > instance store (according to Microsoft Q white papers) with 
> > > > all email on the old server and retain my 33.2gig database on 
> > > > the new server.  As soon as I use Bind view or exmerge to get 
> > > > all the mailboxes out of there containers and into the root I 
> > > > lose single instance store and have a 50gig database on the 
> > > > new server.  Does anyone know how to move mailboxes out of 
> > > > their containers and into the root without having to use a 
> > > > .pst and losing single instance storage?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > David Gibbons
> > > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > > Caliber Collision Centers
> > > > 949-283-7593
> > > > 
> > > > _
> > > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cerification question

[Filipe Joel de Almeida]

On the other side, on the Red Hat certification list there is a lot of
activity...



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier
Sent: segunda-feira, 6 de Maio de 2002 22:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question

They're all trying to fix their broken networks, and it's taking them
awhile.  That isn't part of the core curriculum, unfortunately.


> -Original Message-
> From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Monday, May 06, 2002 04:50 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: Cerification question
> Subject: RE: Cerification question
> 
> 
> There is a list just for MCSE and another for MCSD. I'm 
> subscribed to both, but there hasn't been any post in the 
> last 2 months ;)
> 
> Filipe Joel de Almeida
> Network Consultant
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mobile: +351 967819600
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> Chris Scharff
> Sent: segunda-feira, 6 de Maio de 2002 14:59
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Cerification question
> 
> Isn't there a swynk list dedicated to certification banter?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:27 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Cerification question
> > 
> > 
> > Why do we go through this every three to six months?
> > 
> > William
> > 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.

[Chris Scharff]

Question: Why do you need to move the users to a single container?

> -Original Message-
> From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:52 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.
> 
> 
> Chris and Martin,
> 
> Thanks for the information. *sigh* My manager's going to hate 
> me. But that's what a test lab is for right?
> 
> As for E2K,
> 
> I've yet to really look at it as a possabiliy so my first 
> question is...
> 
> Can I run E2K is it own domain with a DC blah blah blah...  
> Leaving my current NT 4 domain intact and setup a trust 
> between the 2 domains, add the E2K server to my current site 
> and move all the users to it?
> 
> We're not quite ready to move to 2000 yet so I need to work 
> between the lines.
> 
> > Upgrade to E2K.
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:38 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > To All:
> > > 
> > > Current environment
> > > 
> > > Test Lab Server 1
> > > Compaq r3000
> > > 2 PII 333
> > > 1.5gig Ram
> > > 1x 4.1gig OS mirror
> > > 1x 9.1gig Log mirror
> > > 4x 18.1gig Information Store Raid 5
> > > Windows NT 4sp6
> > > Exchange 5.5sp4
> > > Information Store Size 33.2gig (Single Instance) 51gig
> > > uncompressed. 768 mailboxes in information store Container 
> > > Scheme Container for each location e.g.  -Center Location 1  
> > > --User  --User  --ETC  -Center Location 2  --User  --User  --Etc
> > > 
> > > Test Lab Server 2
> > > Compaq ML530
> > > 2 PIII Xoen 1gig
> > > 2gig Ram
> > > 1x 18.1gig OS Mirror
> > > 1x 18.1gig Log Mirror
> > > 4x 36gig Information Store Raid 5
> > > Windows 2000sp2
> > > Exchange 5.5sp4
> > > 
> > > We wish to use Ed's server move method to replace the current
> > > hardware that our exchange server is sitting.  We also wish 
> > > to move all user out of there current containers and set them 
> > > in the root of the exchange server and use address book views 
> > > for our GAL(ie the right way)  Within Ed's server move method 
> > > I can use the server to server move and not lose single 
> > > instance store (according to Microsoft Q white papers) with 
> > > all email on the old server and retain my 33.2gig database on 
> > > the new server.  As soon as I use Bind view or exmerge to get 
> > > all the mailboxes out of there containers and into the root I 
> > > lose single instance store and have a 50gig database on the 
> > > new server.  Does anyone know how to move mailboxes out of 
> > > their containers and into the root without having to use a 
> > > .pst and losing single instance storage?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > David Gibbons
> > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > Caliber Collision Centers
> > > 949-283-7593
> > > 
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.

[David Gibbons]

Chris and Martin,

Thanks for the information. *sigh* My manager's going to hate me. But
that's what a test lab is for right?

As for E2K,

I've yet to really look at it as a possabiliy so my first question is...

Can I run E2K is it own domain with a DC blah blah blah...  Leaving my
current NT 4 domain intact and setup a trust between the 2 domains, add
the E2K server to my current site and move all the users to it?

We're not quite ready to move to 2000 yet so I need to work between the
lines.

> Upgrade to E2K.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:38 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.
> > 
> > 
> > To All:
> > 
> > Current environment
> > 
> > Test Lab Server 1
> > Compaq r3000
> > 2 PII 333
> > 1.5gig Ram
> > 1x 4.1gig OS mirror
> > 1x 9.1gig Log mirror
> > 4x 18.1gig Information Store Raid 5
> > Windows NT 4sp6
> > Exchange 5.5sp4
> > Information Store Size 33.2gig (Single Instance) 51gig 
> > uncompressed. 768 mailboxes in information store Container 
> > Scheme Container for each location e.g.  -Center Location 1  
> > --User  --User  --ETC  -Center Location 2  --User  --User  --Etc
> > 
> > Test Lab Server 2
> > Compaq ML530
> > 2 PIII Xoen 1gig
> > 2gig Ram
> > 1x 18.1gig OS Mirror
> > 1x 18.1gig Log Mirror
> > 4x 36gig Information Store Raid 5
> > Windows 2000sp2
> > Exchange 5.5sp4
> > 
> > We wish to use Ed's server move method to replace the current 
> > hardware that our exchange server is sitting.  We also wish 
> > to move all user out of there current containers and set them 
> > in the root of the exchange server and use address book views 
> > for our GAL(ie the right way)  Within Ed's server move method 
> > I can use the server to server move and not lose single 
> > instance store (according to Microsoft Q white papers) with 
> > all email on the old server and retain my 33.2gig database on 
> > the new server.  As soon as I use Bind view or exmerge to get 
> > all the mailboxes out of there containers and into the root I 
> > lose single instance store and have a 50gig database on the 
> > new server.  Does anyone know how to move mailboxes out of 
> > their containers and into the root without having to use a 
> > .pst and losing single instance storage?
> > 
> > 
> > David Gibbons
> > Sr. Network Engineer
> > Caliber Collision Centers
> > 949-283-7593
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cerification question

[Tom Meunier]

They're all trying to fix their broken networks, and it's taking them
awhile.  That isn't part of the core curriculum, unfortunately.


> -Original Message-
> From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Monday, May 06, 2002 04:50 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: Cerification question
> Subject: RE: Cerification question
> 
> 
> There is a list just for MCSE and another for MCSD. I'm 
> subscribed to both, but there hasn't been any post in the 
> last 2 months ;)
> 
> Filipe Joel de Almeida
> Network Consultant
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mobile: +351 967819600
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> Chris Scharff
> Sent: segunda-feira, 6 de Maio de 2002 14:59
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Cerification question
> 
> Isn't there a swynk list dedicated to certification banter?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:27 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Cerification question
> > 
> > 
> > Why do we go through this every three to six months?
> > 
> > William
> > 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.

[Martin Blackstone]

Not in Exch 5.5

-Original Message-
From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.


To All:

Current environment

Test Lab Server 1
Compaq r3000
2 PII 333
1.5gig Ram
1x 4.1gig OS mirror
1x 9.1gig Log mirror
4x 18.1gig Information Store Raid 5
Windows NT 4sp6
Exchange 5.5sp4
Information Store Size 33.2gig (Single Instance) 51gig uncompressed. 768
mailboxes in information store Container Scheme Container for each location
e.g.  -Center Location 1  --User  --User  --ETC  -Center Location 2  --User
--User  --Etc

Test Lab Server 2
Compaq ML530
2 PIII Xoen 1gig
2gig Ram
1x 18.1gig OS Mirror
1x 18.1gig Log Mirror
4x 36gig Information Store Raid 5
Windows 2000sp2
Exchange 5.5sp4

We wish to use Ed's server move method to replace the current hardware that
our exchange server is sitting.  We also wish to move all user out of there
current containers and set them in the root of the exchange server and use
address book views for our GAL(ie the right way)  Within Ed's server move
method I can use the server to server move and not lose single instance
store (according to Microsoft Q white papers) with all email on the old
server and retain my 33.2gig database on the new server.  As soon as I use
Bind view or exmerge to get all the mailboxes out of there containers and
into the root I lose single instance store and have a 50gig database on the
new server.  Does anyone know how to move mailboxes out of their containers
and into the root without having to use a .pst and losing single instance
storage?


David Gibbons
Sr. Network Engineer
Caliber Collision Centers
949-283-7593

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.

[Chris Scharff]

Upgrade to E2K.

> -Original Message-
> From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:38 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.
> 
> 
> To All:
> 
> Current environment
> 
> Test Lab Server 1
> Compaq r3000
> 2 PII 333
> 1.5gig Ram
> 1x 4.1gig OS mirror
> 1x 9.1gig Log mirror
> 4x 18.1gig Information Store Raid 5
> Windows NT 4sp6
> Exchange 5.5sp4
> Information Store Size 33.2gig (Single Instance) 51gig 
> uncompressed. 768 mailboxes in information store Container 
> Scheme Container for each location e.g.  -Center Location 1  
> --User  --User  --ETC  -Center Location 2  --User  --User  --Etc
> 
> Test Lab Server 2
> Compaq ML530
> 2 PIII Xoen 1gig
> 2gig Ram
> 1x 18.1gig OS Mirror
> 1x 18.1gig Log Mirror
> 4x 36gig Information Store Raid 5
> Windows 2000sp2
> Exchange 5.5sp4
> 
> We wish to use Ed's server move method to replace the current 
> hardware that our exchange server is sitting.  We also wish 
> to move all user out of there current containers and set them 
> in the root of the exchange server and use address book views 
> for our GAL(ie the right way)  Within Ed's server move method 
> I can use the server to server move and not lose single 
> instance store (according to Microsoft Q white papers) with 
> all email on the old server and retain my 33.2gig database on 
> the new server.  As soon as I use Bind view or exmerge to get 
> all the mailboxes out of there containers and into the root I 
> lose single instance store and have a 50gig database on the 
> new server.  Does anyone know how to move mailboxes out of 
> their containers and into the root without having to use a 
> .pst and losing single instance storage?
> 
> 
> David Gibbons
> Sr. Network Engineer
> Caliber Collision Centers
> 949-283-7593
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Forestprep/Domainprep

[Pillai, Raj]

Thanks again

-Original Message-
From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forestprep/Domainprep


I would run forestprep against the Schema Master DC and domainprep against
the PDC Emulator or perhaps Domain Naming Master DC.

- Karen

> -Original Message-
> From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:49 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Forestprep/Domainprep
> 
> 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> Should I be running the Forestprep and Domainprep utility on the Domain
> Controller or the designated E2K Server ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Raj
> 
> 
> **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information
> that
> is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other
> applicable
> privileges, and may constitute non-public information.  This message is
> intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
> not
> the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please
> immediately
> notify the sender that you have received this message in error and
> delete
> this message.  Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution
> or
> reproduction of this message or the information contained in this
> message or
> the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and
> may be
> unlawful.  Thank you for your
> cooperation.
> 
> **
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

**This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that
is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable
privileges, and may constitute non-public information.  This message is
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not
the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately
notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete
this message.  Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or
reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or
the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  Thank you for your
cooperation.
**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cerification question

[Filipe Joel de Almeida]

There is a list just for MCSE and another for MCSD. I'm subscribed to
both, but there hasn't been any post in the last 2 months ;)

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +351 967819600


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: segunda-feira, 6 de Maio de 2002 14:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question

Isn't there a swynk list dedicated to certification banter?

> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:27 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Cerification question
> 
> 
> Why do we go through this every three to six months?  
> 
> William 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> Soysal, Serdar
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:55 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Cerification question
> 
> 
> Certs are not a sign of competency.  They just mean that the 
> person is capable of memorizing braindumps.  I interviewed 
> MCSEs that answered the question "Explain your NT domain 
> structure in your previous job" with an answer like "We had 
> ATM coming to the back of our PCs".  You've got to be careful 
> with MCSEs that come with huge resumes.  There are some ways 
> you can tell if they're good or not though.  For example if 
> the candidate writes MCSE with a larger font than his own 
> name, you probably have a clueless wall-licker in your hands.
> 
> If a person doesn't have certification, it means that he/she 
> has not sat through the tests.  That person can be the most 
> knowledgeable guy out there.
> 
> 
> Serdar Soysal
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Cerification question
> 
> 
> That guy is a knucklehead. The "Best Cert" is the one you 
> need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I 
> have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that 
> industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, 
> Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we 
> were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do 
> it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the 
> knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is 
> that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set.
> 
> I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I 
> hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but 
> he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he 
> wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more 
> experience and never took the time to educate themselves in 
> their chosen craft.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Cerification question
> 
> 
> Don't invite that speaker again.
> 
> Serdar Soysal
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Cerification question
> 
> 
> There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( 
> and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was 
> going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE 
> ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the 
> speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation 
> starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference?
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com

RE: Metric reporting

[Filipe Joel de Almeida]

Yeah, it imports the GAL without any problems, and it processes the logs
without returning errors, but the reports come out all wrong. The thech
support said that version 2.* of MELIA only supports up to Exchange 5.5,
and there will be a new release of MELIA in the second semester of this
year that will fully support Exchange 2K. 

IMHO its one of the best reporting tools for exchange. It has many kinds
of template reports, and the fact that it's built on an ACCESS database,
allows the administrator to directly manipulate the data, and create
it's own queries, or even link the database to some billing software, as
it was done in a company where I usued to work.

Each department was monthly billed by the amount of mail that it's users
sent. And it was all fully automated! Just wonderful!

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +351 967819600


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: segunda-feira, 6 de Maio de 2002 13:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting

Hmmm, I just downloaded a trial version of Melia and it seemed to have
talked OK to an Exchange 2000 server. Well, there is nothing very
sophisticated in talking to the message tracking logs I guess. But it
downloaded the GAL correctly too.

However the reports look very confused and many of them do not display
anything.

Too bad. It is a great tool for 5.5.

-Original Message-
From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Melia is a wonderful program, but unfortunately it doesn't support
Exchange 2000 :(

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +351 967819600


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: sexta-feira, 3 de Maio de 2002 16:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting

Melia Cameo

NetIQ

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Metric reporting


I need a good program to measure exchange traffic of all kinds in and
out of
our org.  Any good ones out there?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Information Store and Single Instance Storage.

[David Gibbons]

To All:

Current environment

Test Lab Server 1
Compaq r3000
2 PII 333
1.5gig Ram
1x 4.1gig OS mirror
1x 9.1gig Log mirror
4x 18.1gig Information Store Raid 5
Windows NT 4sp6
Exchange 5.5sp4
Information Store Size 33.2gig (Single Instance) 51gig uncompressed.
768 mailboxes in information store
Container Scheme Container for each location e.g.
 -Center Location 1
 --User
 --User
 --ETC
 -Center Location 2
 --User
 --User
 --Etc

Test Lab Server 2
Compaq ML530
2 PIII Xoen 1gig
2gig Ram
1x 18.1gig OS Mirror
1x 18.1gig Log Mirror
4x 36gig Information Store Raid 5
Windows 2000sp2
Exchange 5.5sp4

We wish to use Ed's server move method to replace the current hardware
that our exchange server is sitting.  We also wish to move all user out of
there current containers and set them in the root of the exchange server
and use address book views for our GAL(ie the right way)  Within Ed's
server move method I can use the server to server move and not lose single
instance store (according to Microsoft Q white papers) with all email on
the old server and retain my 33.2gig database on the new server.  As soon
as I use Bind view or exmerge to get all the mailboxes out of there
containers and into the root I lose single instance store and have a 50gig
database on the new server.  Does anyone know how to move mailboxes out of
their containers and into the root without having to use a .pst and losing
single instance storage?


David Gibbons
Sr. Network Engineer
Caliber Collision Centers
949-283-7593

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IS Crashing, HELP

[Smith, Ronni]

I wouldn't doubt that needing 512MB min paging space might be true for
Windows 2000 but, for what it is worth, for those still running on NT4 - I
used to run Exchange 5.5 SP3 on a Pentium 180 with 192MB ram running NT4
SP6a with the paging file set to 384 max and min with about 25 very heavy
users (half gig mailboxes & shooting messages with big attachments back and
forth to customers all the time etc.) and I didn't see this issue. That
machine was also my BDC and main print server.

The only differences I see between the question poster's set-up and my
set-up are: I got a new box before I got to SP4 so never had SP4 on that
machine, and I had the paging file set with the same value for max and min.
So I would suggest the following not necessarily in this order: perfopt,
reapply SP4 for Exchange, reapply SP6a for NT4, and lastly, set the paging
space to 512 for both max and min values (although that may not make any
difference but I have seen it recommended to avoid fragmentation of the
paging space).

More helpfully perhaps, here is a possibly/probably useful Q article:
Q172813 "XADM:Troubleshooting High CPU Utilization By Store.exe"

There are also possiblities such as  Q215924, Q230285, Q304228, and Q159297
depending entirely on the particular situation.

All found using a search of "store.exe cpu utilization" (sans quotes) on
Technet (cd version not web version).

hth

Ronni

> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:34 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: IS Crashing, HELP
> 
> 
> With Win2k anything less the 512 for the virtual memory can cause
> problems. That's just what I've found on my own and I'm sure other
> people are going to flame and say that they get away with 
> using a meg or
> so and so. But it's a suggestion and take it at that. I 
> usually set mine
> to a gig total. Min and Max
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:32 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: IS Crashing, HELP
> 
> 
> 
> I could set it a lot higher, but what would that help?  I have 256mb,
> planning to upgrade to 512 physical, and we've only got about 35
> mailboxes (I would consider everyone a "heavy user" though).
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -Warren
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > Ok why's the virtual total set so low? Do you have more disk
> > space? Why
> > not set it at a gig or so?
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> Warren Cundy
> > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:58 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: IS Crashing, HELP
> > 
> > 
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > I'm hoping you can help me.  This is what happens:
> > 
> > We're running Exch 5.5 Sp4 on NT4 Sp6.
> > 
> > I re-boot the server (or restart Exchange services).  The
> > server begins
> > to chew up memory gradually (pretty normal for Exchange).  It goes
> > beyond the physical ram on the machine (256) but doesn't hit 
> > the virtual
> > total (512), usually ends up somewhere in between  (much higher than
> > normal for daily use in our system).  It goes on like this 
> > for about 90
> > minutes.
> > 
> > Then the STORE.EXE process goes to 50% CPU utilization (much
> > higher than
> > normal for daily use around here).  Outlook clients stop responding,
> > much panic ensues.
> > 
> > Now I can stop/start the Exchange services and the problem
> > clears up (at
> > least temporarily).  However it takes a long time for the IS to shut
> > down.. watching task manager, it gradually gives up all of 
> > the memory it
> > has used and then restarts.  It seems very slow (takes 5-6 
> > mins to give
> > up ~200mb of ram).  
> > 
> > Currently it seems to be running  ok, store.exe is taking 
> up a lot of 
> > ram, but looking at the "mem delta" counter, its both using it and 
> > giving it back (normal Exchange behavior).  This is after 3 
> restarts 
> > following the scenario above, which also happened earlier last week.
> > 
> > So, my questions are:
> > 
> > - can anyone help me find out what is going on?
> > - what kinds of tools or methods are people using to diagnose this 
> > stuff?
> > 
> > I'm at about the stage of re-applying Sp6 for NT, Sp4 for 
> Exchange, or
> 
> > both, just to see if that will help.
> > 
> > Thanks for any help.
> > 
> > -Warren
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[E

RE: IS Crashing, HELP

[Warren Cundy]

Trend Scanmail 3.6, scan engine 6.15. I stopped it for a while to help
troubleshoot.  It didn't help at the time.

-Warren


> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:09 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: IS Crashing, HELP
> 
> 
> What AV software?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:34 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: IS Crashing, HELP
> 
> 
> 1) about 3.2 gigs
> 2) 35, all heavy users
> 3) nothing, honest. :)  It did this a few times last week, 
> then was fine for
> about 6 days, now the same problem.
> 
> This particular machine is overdue for a Win2k upgrade as 
> well, but this
> problem seems to be Exchange related (and not OS) from what I 
> can tell.
> 
> -Warren
> 
> 
> > I would also like to know the following:
> > 
> > 1) How big is your IS?
> > 2) How many users are we talking about?
> > 3) What has changed on your server (I assume it wasn't doing
> > this before
> > today)?
> > 
> > Cheers.
> > 
> > Nate Couch
> > EDS Messaging
> > 
> > > --
> > > From: Orr, Dale
> > > Reply To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Sent: Monday, May 6, 2002 12:12
> > > To:   Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject:  RE: IS Crashing, HELP
> > > 
> > > Agreed. That would be the first thing I'd try, then run perfopt.
> > > 
> > > Dale L. Orr
> > > Network Administrator
> > > DoD Polygraph Institute
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 1:06 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: IS Crashing, HELP
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I think I would re-apply sp4 first.  Anything in the app
> > event log by
> > > any chance?
> > > 
> > > William
> > > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> > Warren Cundy
> > > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:58 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: IS Crashing, HELP
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi All,
> > > 
> > > I'm hoping you can help me.  This is what happens:
> > > 
> > > We're running Exch 5.5 Sp4 on NT4 Sp6.
> > > 
> > > I re-boot the server (or restart Exchange services).  The
> > server begins
> > > to chew up memory gradually (pretty normal for Exchange). 
>  It goes 
> > > beyond the physical ram on the machine (256) but doesn't
> > hit the virtual
> > > total (512), usually ends up somewhere in between  (much 
> higher than 
> > > normal for daily use in our system).  It goes on like this
> > for about 90
> > > minutes.
> > > 
> > > Then the STORE.EXE process goes to 50% CPU utilization
> > (much higher than
> > > normal for daily use around here).  Outlook clients stop 
> responding, 
> > > much panic ensues.
> > > 
> > > Now I can stop/start the Exchange services and the problem
> > clears up (at
> > > least temporarily).  However it takes a long time for the 
> IS to shut 
> > > down.. watching task manager, it gradually gives up all of
> > the memory it
> > > has used and then restarts.  It seems very slow (takes 5-6
> > mins to give
> > > up ~200mb of ram).
> > > 
> > > Currently it seems to be running  ok, store.exe is taking
> > up a lot of
> > > ram, but looking at the "mem delta" counter, its both 
> using it and 
> > > giving it back (normal Exchange behavior).  This is after 
> 3 restarts 
> > > following the scenario above, which also happened earlier 
> last week.
> > > 
> > > So, my questions are:
> > > 
> > > - can anyone help me find out what is going on?
> > > - what kinds of tools or methods are people using to 
> diagnose this 
> > > stuff?
> > > 
> > > I'm at about the stage of re-applying Sp6 for NT, Sp4 for
> > Exchange, or
> > > both, just to see if that will help.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for any help.
> > > 
> > > -Warren
> > > 
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:

RE: Forestprep/Domainprep

[Karen McLaughlin]

I would run forestprep against the Schema Master DC and domainprep against
the PDC Emulator or perhaps Domain Naming Master DC.

- Karen

> -Original Message-
> From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:49 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Forestprep/Domainprep
> 
> 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> Should I be running the Forestprep and Domainprep utility on the Domain
> Controller or the designated E2K Server ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Raj
> 
> 
> **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information
> that
> is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other
> applicable
> privileges, and may constitute non-public information.  This message is
> intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
> not
> the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please
> immediately
> notify the sender that you have received this message in error and
> delete
> this message.  Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution
> or
> reproduction of this message or the information contained in this
> message or
> the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and
> may be
> unlawful.  Thank you for your
> cooperation.
> 
> **
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Forestprep/Domainprep

[William Lefkovics]

I always run them from the Exchange Server.  It ensures the intended box
sees the DC/GC.

William

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forestprep/Domainprep


Hi Guys,

Should I be running the Forestprep and Domainprep utility on the Domain
Controller or the designated E2K Server ?

Thanks,

Raj


**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Forestprep/Domainprep

[Pillai, Raj]

Thanks.

> -Original Message-
> From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 3:49 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Forestprep/Domainprep
> 
> 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> Should I be running the Forestprep and Domainprep utility on 
> the Domain Controller or the designated E2K Server ?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

**This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that
is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable
privileges, and may constitute non-public information.  This message is
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not
the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately
notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete
this message.  Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or
reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or
the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  Thank you for your
cooperation.
**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Forestprep/Domainprep

[Muqeem Syed]

On the designated exchange sever... it will do the rest on the Active
Directory for you.. 

-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forestprep/Domainprep


Hi Guys,

Should I be running the Forestprep and Domainprep utility on the Domain
Controller or the designated E2K Server ?

Thanks,

Raj


**This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information
that
is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other
applicable
privileges, and may constitute non-public information.  This message is
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
not
the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please
immediately
notify the sender that you have received this message in error and
delete
this message.  Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution
or
reproduction of this message or the information contained in this
message or
the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and
may be
unlawful.  Thank you for your
cooperation.

**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Forestprep/Domainprep

[Chris Scharff]

Doesn't matter.

> -Original Message-
> From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 3:49 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Forestprep/Domainprep
> 
> 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> Should I be running the Forestprep and Domainprep utility on 
> the Domain Controller or the designated E2K Server ?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Forestprep/Domainprep

[Pillai, Raj]

Hi Guys,

Should I be running the Forestprep and Domainprep utility on the Domain
Controller or the designated E2K Server ?

Thanks,

Raj

**This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that
is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable
privileges, and may constitute non-public information.  This message is
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not
the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately
notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete
this message.  Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or
reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or
the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  Thank you for your
cooperation.
**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Outlook XP

[Stidley, Joel]

You may also want to try this too:

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider]
"Rpc_Binding_Order"="ncacn_ip_tcp"


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP


Actually, they ran out of Coors and Coors Lite..

;)

-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP


Plenty of beer there.

Tech Ed this year they ran out.  Pissed a lot of folks off.



Thank you,
 
Ron Crumbaker, MCP


-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP


A beer at MEC will be fine. :)

-Original Message-
From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP

OK, I applied that patch...all I can say..

YESMUCH BETTER.

Thanks a $5 bill. (thats all I have)


Thank you,
 
Ron Crumbaker, MCP


-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP


Well it's pretty much all around slow.  Slow opening attachments, slow
selecting multiple messages, slow connecting to other mailboxes. Opening
other users folders is slow even on same server.

-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook XP


When you say slow connecting to the server, what do you mean? Is it slow
connecting to the server on startup or is it slow opening attachments
after OL is already up?

If it's attachments, try Q300904.

Tom.

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook XP

Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to
the exchange server? 5.5 and 2k.  Whats the deal?  

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: any news on sp3?

[William Lefkovics]

Sharing this doesn't violate your NDA?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen
Mynhier
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


Actually, let me correct myself.
In order to run E2k on a .Net server, it will require E2k SP4 In order
to run E2k with a .Net DC, we'll need E2k SP3

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Monday, May 06, 2002 3:18 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: any news on sp3?
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


I thought that first part had not been determined yet.  Oh well.

The latter has been the case for a long time.  Still waiting.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen
Mynhier
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 1:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


No, it will not require Win2k SP3.  I am running E2k SP3 on my box just
fine with only Win2k SP2.  In order to run E2k on a .Net server,
however, it will require E2k SP3.


-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:47 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: any news on sp3?
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


What year?

Might it require Windows2000 sp3?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


July is the target date

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: any news on sp3?


Ok... I lost my page a while back in the book known as "waiting for the
service pack".

Anyone seen anything anywhere about ex2ksp3?  info?  target date?

Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Perfmon

[Miller, Robert]

All,

I have an X400 Bridgehead (5.5 SP4 with 21 X400 connectors) that for some
reason can no longer run Perfmon against the MTA or the MTA Connections
objects. Actually the objects don't even show up in Perfmon anymore. This
happens whether running perfmon local or remote. Any ideas?

TIA,

BM

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: any news on sp3?

[Stephen Mynhier]

Actually, let me correct myself.
In order to run E2k on a .Net server, it will require E2k SP4
In order to run E2k with a .Net DC, we'll need E2k SP3

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Monday, May 06, 2002 3:18 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: any news on sp3?
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


I thought that first part had not been determined yet.  Oh well.

The latter has been the case for a long time.  Still waiting.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen
Mynhier
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 1:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


No, it will not require Win2k SP3.  I am running E2k SP3 on my box just
fine with only Win2k SP2.  In order to run E2k on a .Net server,
however, it will require E2k SP3.


-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:47 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: any news on sp3?
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


What year?

Might it require Windows2000 sp3?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


July is the target date

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: any news on sp3?


Ok... I lost my page a while back in the book known as "waiting for the
service pack".

Anyone seen anything anywhere about ex2ksp3?  info?  target date?

Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IS Crashing, HELP

[Martin Blackstone]

What AV software?

-Original Message-
From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IS Crashing, HELP


1) about 3.2 gigs
2) 35, all heavy users
3) nothing, honest. :)  It did this a few times last week, then was fine for
about 6 days, now the same problem.

This particular machine is overdue for a Win2k upgrade as well, but this
problem seems to be Exchange related (and not OS) from what I can tell.

-Warren


> I would also like to know the following:
> 
> 1) How big is your IS?
> 2) How many users are we talking about?
> 3) What has changed on your server (I assume it wasn't doing
> this before
> today)?
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> Nate Couch
> EDS Messaging
> 
> > --
> > From:   Orr, Dale
> > Reply To:   Exchange Discussions
> > Sent:   Monday, May 6, 2002 12:12
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject:RE: IS Crashing, HELP
> > 
> > Agreed. That would be the first thing I'd try, then run perfopt.
> > 
> > Dale L. Orr
> > Network Administrator
> > DoD Polygraph Institute
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 1:06 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: IS Crashing, HELP
> > 
> > 
> > I think I would re-apply sp4 first.  Anything in the app
> event log by
> > any chance?
> > 
> > William
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Warren Cundy
> > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:58 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: IS Crashing, HELP
> > 
> > 
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > I'm hoping you can help me.  This is what happens:
> > 
> > We're running Exch 5.5 Sp4 on NT4 Sp6.
> > 
> > I re-boot the server (or restart Exchange services).  The
> server begins
> > to chew up memory gradually (pretty normal for Exchange).  It goes 
> > beyond the physical ram on the machine (256) but doesn't
> hit the virtual
> > total (512), usually ends up somewhere in between  (much higher than 
> > normal for daily use in our system).  It goes on like this
> for about 90
> > minutes.
> > 
> > Then the STORE.EXE process goes to 50% CPU utilization
> (much higher than
> > normal for daily use around here).  Outlook clients stop responding, 
> > much panic ensues.
> > 
> > Now I can stop/start the Exchange services and the problem
> clears up (at
> > least temporarily).  However it takes a long time for the IS to shut 
> > down.. watching task manager, it gradually gives up all of
> the memory it
> > has used and then restarts.  It seems very slow (takes 5-6
> mins to give
> > up ~200mb of ram).
> > 
> > Currently it seems to be running  ok, store.exe is taking
> up a lot of
> > ram, but looking at the "mem delta" counter, its both using it and 
> > giving it back (normal Exchange behavior).  This is after 3 restarts 
> > following the scenario above, which also happened earlier last week.
> > 
> > So, my questions are:
> > 
> > - can anyone help me find out what is going on?
> > - what kinds of tools or methods are people using to diagnose this 
> > stuff?
> > 
> > I'm at about the stage of re-applying Sp6 for NT, Sp4 for
> Exchange, or
> > both, just to see if that will help.
> > 
> > Thanks for any help.
> > 
> > -Warren
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resou

RE: IS Crashing, HELP

[Christopher Hummert]

With Win2k anything less the 512 for the virtual memory can cause
problems. That's just what I've found on my own and I'm sure other
people are going to flame and say that they get away with using a meg or
so and so. But it's a suggestion and take it at that. I usually set mine
to a gig total. Min and Max

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IS Crashing, HELP



I could set it a lot higher, but what would that help?  I have 256mb,
planning to upgrade to 512 physical, and we've only got about 35
mailboxes (I would consider everyone a "heavy user" though).

Thanks

-Warren



> 
> Ok why's the virtual total set so low? Do you have more disk
> space? Why
> not set it at a gig or so?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:58 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: IS Crashing, HELP
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I'm hoping you can help me.  This is what happens:
> 
> We're running Exch 5.5 Sp4 on NT4 Sp6.
> 
> I re-boot the server (or restart Exchange services).  The
> server begins
> to chew up memory gradually (pretty normal for Exchange).  It goes
> beyond the physical ram on the machine (256) but doesn't hit 
> the virtual
> total (512), usually ends up somewhere in between  (much higher than
> normal for daily use in our system).  It goes on like this 
> for about 90
> minutes.
> 
> Then the STORE.EXE process goes to 50% CPU utilization (much
> higher than
> normal for daily use around here).  Outlook clients stop responding,
> much panic ensues.
> 
> Now I can stop/start the Exchange services and the problem
> clears up (at
> least temporarily).  However it takes a long time for the IS to shut
> down.. watching task manager, it gradually gives up all of 
> the memory it
> has used and then restarts.  It seems very slow (takes 5-6 
> mins to give
> up ~200mb of ram).  
> 
> Currently it seems to be running  ok, store.exe is taking up a lot of 
> ram, but looking at the "mem delta" counter, its both using it and 
> giving it back (normal Exchange behavior).  This is after 3 restarts 
> following the scenario above, which also happened earlier last week.
> 
> So, my questions are:
> 
> - can anyone help me find out what is going on?
> - what kinds of tools or methods are people using to diagnose this 
> stuff?
> 
> I'm at about the stage of re-applying Sp6 for NT, Sp4 for Exchange, or

> both, just to see if that will help.
> 
> Thanks for any help.
> 
> -Warren
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IS Crashing, HELP

[Warren Cundy]

1) about 3.2 gigs
2) 35, all heavy users
3) nothing, honest. :)  It did this a few times last week, then was fine for
about 6 days, now the same problem.

This particular machine is overdue for a Win2k upgrade as well, but this
problem seems to be Exchange related (and not OS) from what I can tell.

-Warren


> I would also like to know the following:
> 
> 1) How big is your IS?
> 2) How many users are we talking about?
> 3) What has changed on your server (I assume it wasn't doing 
> this before
> today)?
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> Nate Couch
> EDS Messaging
> 
> > --
> > From:   Orr, Dale
> > Reply To:   Exchange Discussions
> > Sent:   Monday, May 6, 2002 12:12
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject:RE: IS Crashing, HELP
> > 
> > Agreed. That would be the first thing I'd try, then run perfopt.
> > 
> > Dale L. Orr
> > Network Administrator
> > DoD Polygraph Institute
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 1:06 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: IS Crashing, HELP
> > 
> > 
> > I think I would re-apply sp4 first.  Anything in the app 
> event log by
> > any chance?
> > 
> > William
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> Warren Cundy
> > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:58 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: IS Crashing, HELP
> > 
> > 
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > I'm hoping you can help me.  This is what happens:
> > 
> > We're running Exch 5.5 Sp4 on NT4 Sp6.
> > 
> > I re-boot the server (or restart Exchange services).  The 
> server begins
> > to chew up memory gradually (pretty normal for Exchange).  It goes
> > beyond the physical ram on the machine (256) but doesn't 
> hit the virtual
> > total (512), usually ends up somewhere in between  (much higher than
> > normal for daily use in our system).  It goes on like this 
> for about 90
> > minutes.
> > 
> > Then the STORE.EXE process goes to 50% CPU utilization 
> (much higher than
> > normal for daily use around here).  Outlook clients stop responding,
> > much panic ensues.
> > 
> > Now I can stop/start the Exchange services and the problem 
> clears up (at
> > least temporarily).  However it takes a long time for the IS to shut
> > down.. watching task manager, it gradually gives up all of 
> the memory it
> > has used and then restarts.  It seems very slow (takes 5-6 
> mins to give
> > up ~200mb of ram).  
> > 
> > Currently it seems to be running  ok, store.exe is taking 
> up a lot of
> > ram, but looking at the "mem delta" counter, its both using it and
> > giving it back (normal Exchange behavior).  This is after 3 restarts
> > following the scenario above, which also happened earlier last week.
> > 
> > So, my questions are:
> > 
> > - can anyone help me find out what is going on?
> > - what kinds of tools or methods are people using to diagnose this
> > stuff?
> > 
> > I'm at about the stage of re-applying Sp6 for NT, Sp4 for 
> Exchange, or
> > both, just to see if that will help.
> > 
> > Thanks for any help.
> > 
> > -Warren
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IS Crashing, HELP

[Warren Cundy]

Nothing in the event logs that helps.  I think I will re-apply Sp4 the next
time this problem crops up (running ok so far today).

Thanks

-Warren

 
> I think I would re-apply sp4 first.  Anything in the app event log by
> any chance?
> 
> William
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:58 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: IS Crashing, HELP
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I'm hoping you can help me.  This is what happens:
> 
> We're running Exch 5.5 Sp4 on NT4 Sp6.
> 
> I re-boot the server (or restart Exchange services).  The 
> server begins
> to chew up memory gradually (pretty normal for Exchange).  It goes
> beyond the physical ram on the machine (256) but doesn't hit 
> the virtual
> total (512), usually ends up somewhere in between  (much higher than
> normal for daily use in our system).  It goes on like this 
> for about 90
> minutes.
> 
> Then the STORE.EXE process goes to 50% CPU utilization (much 
> higher than
> normal for daily use around here).  Outlook clients stop responding,
> much panic ensues.
> 
> Now I can stop/start the Exchange services and the problem 
> clears up (at
> least temporarily).  However it takes a long time for the IS to shut
> down.. watching task manager, it gradually gives up all of 
> the memory it
> has used and then restarts.  It seems very slow (takes 5-6 
> mins to give
> up ~200mb of ram).  
> 
> Currently it seems to be running  ok, store.exe is taking up a lot of
> ram, but looking at the "mem delta" counter, its both using it and
> giving it back (normal Exchange behavior).  This is after 3 restarts
> following the scenario above, which also happened earlier last week.
> 
> So, my questions are:
> 
> - can anyone help me find out what is going on?
> - what kinds of tools or methods are people using to diagnose this
> stuff?
> 
> I'm at about the stage of re-applying Sp6 for NT, Sp4 for Exchange, or
> both, just to see if that will help.
> 
> Thanks for any help.
> 
> -Warren
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IS Crashing, HELP

[Warren Cundy]

I could set it a lot higher, but what would that help?  I have 256mb,
planning to upgrade to 512 physical, and we've only got about 35 mailboxes
(I would consider everyone a "heavy user" though).

Thanks

-Warren



> 
> Ok why's the virtual total set so low? Do you have more disk 
> space? Why
> not set it at a gig or so?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:58 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: IS Crashing, HELP
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I'm hoping you can help me.  This is what happens:
> 
> We're running Exch 5.5 Sp4 on NT4 Sp6.
> 
> I re-boot the server (or restart Exchange services).  The 
> server begins
> to chew up memory gradually (pretty normal for Exchange).  It goes
> beyond the physical ram on the machine (256) but doesn't hit 
> the virtual
> total (512), usually ends up somewhere in between  (much higher than
> normal for daily use in our system).  It goes on like this 
> for about 90
> minutes.
> 
> Then the STORE.EXE process goes to 50% CPU utilization (much 
> higher than
> normal for daily use around here).  Outlook clients stop responding,
> much panic ensues.
> 
> Now I can stop/start the Exchange services and the problem 
> clears up (at
> least temporarily).  However it takes a long time for the IS to shut
> down.. watching task manager, it gradually gives up all of 
> the memory it
> has used and then restarts.  It seems very slow (takes 5-6 
> mins to give
> up ~200mb of ram).  
> 
> Currently it seems to be running  ok, store.exe is taking up a lot of
> ram, but looking at the "mem delta" counter, its both using it and
> giving it back (normal Exchange behavior).  This is after 3 restarts
> following the scenario above, which also happened earlier last week.
> 
> So, my questions are:
> 
> - can anyone help me find out what is going on?
> - what kinds of tools or methods are people using to diagnose this
> stuff?
> 
> I'm at about the stage of re-applying Sp6 for NT, Sp4 for Exchange, or
> both, just to see if that will help.
> 
> Thanks for any help.
> 
> -Warren
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Metric reporting

[Bob Sadler]

Ahh...well, I won't have that problem :)  I'm only allowed to keep 15 days worth of 
logs, backups, message tracking, etc.



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 X194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  


-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


as the database grows, the report generation will slow...when my database
reaches 900MB, everything seems to run slow..so then I basically prune that
database to only include the last 4 weeks or so..

-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


I just started using it today.  It doesn't seem to run slow to me, but I
have nothing to compare it against.  Love the amount of information I can
get from it!



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 X194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  


-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


it does seem to run slow on our machine too, but I was thinking it was the
box itself...plus we have some other things running on that machine.  I am
happy with the product (and support) though. dave

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Do you think that Promodag retrieves Tracking and Directory info slow?  It
runs extremely slow on my machine.  

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Never mind. Figured it out. One of my administrative groups does not have
any servers and happens to be first alphabetically. Promodag did not like
that and crapped out right away. After I renamed the admin group and dropped
it down to the bottom of the alphabet Promodag ran fine

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


So any Promodag specialists here? :)

I installed a trial version and it is refusing to connect to my domain
controllers.

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Promodag Reports does an excellent job, IMHO.

www.promodag.com

Jim Blunt

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Take a look at NetIQ App Ann for Exchange

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Metric reporting

I need a good program to measure exchange traffic of all kinds in and out of
our org.  Any good ones out there?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__

RE: IS Crashing, HELP

[Couch, Nate]

I would also like to know the following:

1) How big is your IS?
2) How many users are we talking about?
3) What has changed on your server (I assume it wasn't doing this before
today)?

Cheers.

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

> --
> From: Orr, Dale
> Reply To: Exchange Discussions
> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2002 12:12
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  RE: IS Crashing, HELP
> 
> Agreed. That would be the first thing I'd try, then run perfopt.
> 
> Dale L. Orr
> Network Administrator
> DoD Polygraph Institute
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 1:06 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: IS Crashing, HELP
> 
> 
> I think I would re-apply sp4 first.  Anything in the app event log by
> any chance?
> 
> William
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:58 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: IS Crashing, HELP
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I'm hoping you can help me.  This is what happens:
> 
> We're running Exch 5.5 Sp4 on NT4 Sp6.
> 
> I re-boot the server (or restart Exchange services).  The server begins
> to chew up memory gradually (pretty normal for Exchange).  It goes
> beyond the physical ram on the machine (256) but doesn't hit the virtual
> total (512), usually ends up somewhere in between  (much higher than
> normal for daily use in our system).  It goes on like this for about 90
> minutes.
> 
> Then the STORE.EXE process goes to 50% CPU utilization (much higher than
> normal for daily use around here).  Outlook clients stop responding,
> much panic ensues.
> 
> Now I can stop/start the Exchange services and the problem clears up (at
> least temporarily).  However it takes a long time for the IS to shut
> down.. watching task manager, it gradually gives up all of the memory it
> has used and then restarts.  It seems very slow (takes 5-6 mins to give
> up ~200mb of ram).  
> 
> Currently it seems to be running  ok, store.exe is taking up a lot of
> ram, but looking at the "mem delta" counter, its both using it and
> giving it back (normal Exchange behavior).  This is after 3 restarts
> following the scenario above, which also happened earlier last week.
> 
> So, my questions are:
> 
> - can anyone help me find out what is going on?
> - what kinds of tools or methods are people using to diagnose this
> stuff?
> 
> I'm at about the stage of re-applying Sp6 for NT, Sp4 for Exchange, or
> both, just to see if that will help.
> 
> Thanks for any help.
> 
> -Warren
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IS Crashing, HELP

[William Lefkovics]

Then see if the symptoms match any post-sp4 issue.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Orr, Dale
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IS Crashing, HELP


Agreed. That would be the first thing I'd try, then run perfopt.

Dale L. Orr
Network Administrator
DoD Polygraph Institute


-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IS Crashing, HELP


I think I would re-apply sp4 first.  Anything in the app event log by
any chance?

William

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IS Crashing, HELP


Hi All,

I'm hoping you can help me.  This is what happens:

We're running Exch 5.5 Sp4 on NT4 Sp6.

I re-boot the server (or restart Exchange services).  The server begins
to chew up memory gradually (pretty normal for Exchange).  It goes
beyond the physical ram on the machine (256) but doesn't hit the virtual
total (512), usually ends up somewhere in between  (much higher than
normal for daily use in our system).  It goes on like this for about 90
minutes.

Then the STORE.EXE process goes to 50% CPU utilization (much higher than
normal for daily use around here).  Outlook clients stop responding,
much panic ensues.

Now I can stop/start the Exchange services and the problem clears up (at
least temporarily).  However it takes a long time for the IS to shut
down.. watching task manager, it gradually gives up all of the memory it
has used and then restarts.  It seems very slow (takes 5-6 mins to give
up ~200mb of ram).  

Currently it seems to be running  ok, store.exe is taking up a lot of
ram, but looking at the "mem delta" counter, its both using it and
giving it back (normal Exchange behavior).  This is after 3 restarts
following the scenario above, which also happened earlier last week.

So, my questions are:

- can anyone help me find out what is going on?
- what kinds of tools or methods are people using to diagnose this
stuff?

I'm at about the stage of re-applying Sp6 for NT, Sp4 for Exchange, or
both, just to see if that will help.

Thanks for any help.

-Warren

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IS Crashing, HELP

[Orr, Dale]

Agreed. That would be the first thing I'd try, then run perfopt.

Dale L. Orr
Network Administrator
DoD Polygraph Institute


-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IS Crashing, HELP


I think I would re-apply sp4 first.  Anything in the app event log by
any chance?

William

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IS Crashing, HELP


Hi All,

I'm hoping you can help me.  This is what happens:

We're running Exch 5.5 Sp4 on NT4 Sp6.

I re-boot the server (or restart Exchange services).  The server begins
to chew up memory gradually (pretty normal for Exchange).  It goes
beyond the physical ram on the machine (256) but doesn't hit the virtual
total (512), usually ends up somewhere in between  (much higher than
normal for daily use in our system).  It goes on like this for about 90
minutes.

Then the STORE.EXE process goes to 50% CPU utilization (much higher than
normal for daily use around here).  Outlook clients stop responding,
much panic ensues.

Now I can stop/start the Exchange services and the problem clears up (at
least temporarily).  However it takes a long time for the IS to shut
down.. watching task manager, it gradually gives up all of the memory it
has used and then restarts.  It seems very slow (takes 5-6 mins to give
up ~200mb of ram).  

Currently it seems to be running  ok, store.exe is taking up a lot of
ram, but looking at the "mem delta" counter, its both using it and
giving it back (normal Exchange behavior).  This is after 3 restarts
following the scenario above, which also happened earlier last week.

So, my questions are:

- can anyone help me find out what is going on?
- what kinds of tools or methods are people using to diagnose this
stuff?

I'm at about the stage of re-applying Sp6 for NT, Sp4 for Exchange, or
both, just to see if that will help.

Thanks for any help.

-Warren

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Metric reporting

[Stevens, Dave]

as the database grows, the report generation will slow...when my database
reaches 900MB, everything seems to run slow..so then I basically prune that
database to only include the last 4 weeks or so..

-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


I just started using it today.  It doesn't seem to run slow to me, but I
have nothing to compare it against.  Love the amount of information I can
get from it!



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 X194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  


-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


it does seem to run slow on our machine too, but I was thinking it was the
box itself...plus we have some other things running on that machine.  I am
happy with the product (and support) though. dave

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Do you think that Promodag retrieves Tracking and Directory info slow?  It
runs extremely slow on my machine.  

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Never mind. Figured it out. One of my administrative groups does not have
any servers and happens to be first alphabetically. Promodag did not like
that and crapped out right away. After I renamed the admin group and dropped
it down to the bottom of the alphabet Promodag ran fine

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


So any Promodag specialists here? :)

I installed a trial version and it is refusing to connect to my domain
controllers.

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Promodag Reports does an excellent job, IMHO.

www.promodag.com

Jim Blunt

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Take a look at NetIQ App Ann for Exchange

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Metric reporting

I need a good program to measure exchange traffic of all kinds in and out of
our org.  Any good ones out there?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   

RE: IS Crashing, HELP

[William Lefkovics]

I think I would re-apply sp4 first.  Anything in the app event log by
any chance?

William

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IS Crashing, HELP


Hi All,

I'm hoping you can help me.  This is what happens:

We're running Exch 5.5 Sp4 on NT4 Sp6.

I re-boot the server (or restart Exchange services).  The server begins
to chew up memory gradually (pretty normal for Exchange).  It goes
beyond the physical ram on the machine (256) but doesn't hit the virtual
total (512), usually ends up somewhere in between  (much higher than
normal for daily use in our system).  It goes on like this for about 90
minutes.

Then the STORE.EXE process goes to 50% CPU utilization (much higher than
normal for daily use around here).  Outlook clients stop responding,
much panic ensues.

Now I can stop/start the Exchange services and the problem clears up (at
least temporarily).  However it takes a long time for the IS to shut
down.. watching task manager, it gradually gives up all of the memory it
has used and then restarts.  It seems very slow (takes 5-6 mins to give
up ~200mb of ram).  

Currently it seems to be running  ok, store.exe is taking up a lot of
ram, but looking at the "mem delta" counter, its both using it and
giving it back (normal Exchange behavior).  This is after 3 restarts
following the scenario above, which also happened earlier last week.

So, my questions are:

- can anyone help me find out what is going on?
- what kinds of tools or methods are people using to diagnose this
stuff?

I'm at about the stage of re-applying Sp6 for NT, Sp4 for Exchange, or
both, just to see if that will help.

Thanks for any help.

-Warren

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: IS Crashing, HELP

[Christopher Hummert]

Ok why's the virtual total set so low? Do you have more disk space? Why
not set it at a gig or so?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IS Crashing, HELP


Hi All,

I'm hoping you can help me.  This is what happens:

We're running Exch 5.5 Sp4 on NT4 Sp6.

I re-boot the server (or restart Exchange services).  The server begins
to chew up memory gradually (pretty normal for Exchange).  It goes
beyond the physical ram on the machine (256) but doesn't hit the virtual
total (512), usually ends up somewhere in between  (much higher than
normal for daily use in our system).  It goes on like this for about 90
minutes.

Then the STORE.EXE process goes to 50% CPU utilization (much higher than
normal for daily use around here).  Outlook clients stop responding,
much panic ensues.

Now I can stop/start the Exchange services and the problem clears up (at
least temporarily).  However it takes a long time for the IS to shut
down.. watching task manager, it gradually gives up all of the memory it
has used and then restarts.  It seems very slow (takes 5-6 mins to give
up ~200mb of ram).  

Currently it seems to be running  ok, store.exe is taking up a lot of
ram, but looking at the "mem delta" counter, its both using it and
giving it back (normal Exchange behavior).  This is after 3 restarts
following the scenario above, which also happened earlier last week.

So, my questions are:

- can anyone help me find out what is going on?
- what kinds of tools or methods are people using to diagnose this
stuff?

I'm at about the stage of re-applying Sp6 for NT, Sp4 for Exchange, or
both, just to see if that will help.

Thanks for any help.

-Warren

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

IS Crashing, HELP

[Warren Cundy]

Hi All,

I'm hoping you can help me.  This is what happens:

We're running Exch 5.5 Sp4 on NT4 Sp6.

I re-boot the server (or restart Exchange services).  The server begins to
chew up memory gradually (pretty normal for Exchange).  It goes beyond the
physical ram on the machine (256) but doesn't hit the virtual total (512),
usually ends up somewhere in between  (much higher than normal for daily use
in our system).  It goes on like this for about 90 minutes.

Then the STORE.EXE process goes to 50% CPU utilization (much higher than
normal for daily use around here).  Outlook clients stop responding, much
panic ensues.

Now I can stop/start the Exchange services and the problem clears up (at
least temporarily).  However it takes a long time for the IS to shut down..
watching task manager, it gradually gives up all of the memory it has used
and then restarts.  It seems very slow (takes 5-6 mins to give up ~200mb of
ram).  

Currently it seems to be running  ok, store.exe is taking up a lot of ram,
but looking at the "mem delta" counter, its both using it and giving it back
(normal Exchange behavior).  This is after 3 restarts following the scenario
above, which also happened earlier last week.

So, my questions are:

- can anyone help me find out what is going on?
- what kinds of tools or methods are people using to diagnose this stuff?

I'm at about the stage of re-applying Sp6 for NT, Sp4 for Exchange, or both,
just to see if that will help.

Thanks for any help.

-Warren

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Antigen question

[Haber, David J.]

Yes. We had to get a different version of the Antigen Client exe from Sybari
tech support. Once we replaced the exe that was orignally installed with the
new one the client worked just fine.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Antigen Question

[Haber, David J.]

Yes. We had to get a different version of the Antigen Client exe from Sybari
tech support. Once we replaced the exe that was orignally installed with the
new one the client worked just fine.

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 8:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Antigen Question


Speaking of 6.5, I installed it on one of my servers and the Antigen GUI is
extremely slow. Is that normal?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 6:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Antigen Question


We had a similar problem about a month ago.  The support I received from
them was outstanding.  Here is what they suggested I do:

Try using our ftp site instead of the http site: If you right mouse click on
the Network update path, select ftp and it will automatically change to the
FTP site for download for your engines and then click update now. If that
does not work then modify the registry value that holds the timeout
setting:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Sybari Software\6.0\EngineDownloadTimeout

This value is measured in seconds and is set to 120 (decimal) by default.
Changing it to 300 (5 minutes) usually resolved any timeout problems.  Keep
in mind this registry change, the Antigen and Exchange services DON'T
require restarting.

The default timeout has been changed to 300 seconds in Antigen 6.5. 

Hope this helps.

-Original Message-
From: Sandhya Pai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Antigen Question


Hello Antigen users,

I have Exchange 5.5 on NT 4 server.  I am using Antigen 6.2 for Exchange.
We've been using Antigen for over a year and just about 2 months we started
having problems with automatic update feature.  It runs into problems with
renaming directories.  To fix the problem, I have to stop Exchange, reboot
the server and then rename the directories.  It's very frustrating because I
can only do this on Weekend.  I've tried their tech support and they keep
giving me directions for manual update (mentioned above).  I've even
uninstalled and reinstalled the software but with no use.

Any help will be appreciated.

Sandhya

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SMTP 550 Error

[Chris H]

very nice. Thanks. I was previously using the Black Hole feature in Sam
Spade.

"Beaten paths are for beaten men."
Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer.


- Original Message -
From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:11 PM
Subject: RE: SMTP 550 Error


Go punch it into http://relays.osirusoft.com/cgi-bin/rbcheck.cgi

Then go get it removed from http://xbl.selward.cx

That's a start.

> -Original Message-
> From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:30 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: SMTP 550 Error
> Subject: Re: SMTP 550 Error
>
>
> I did munge the info.
>
> mail.kacpi.com
> 216.141.241.124
>
>
>
> "Beaten paths are for beaten men."
> Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:09 AM
> Subject: RE: SMTP 550 Error
>
>
> I'd say it's a DNS problem, as the 216.xxx.xxx.xxx does not
> accurately reflect the public DNS info for ourdomain.com.
> Unless you're just munging the info.  It's public info anyway
> - don't munge it, it makes troubleshooting a PITA.
>
>
> Non-authoritative answer:
> ourdomain.com   MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = ourdomain.com
>
> ourdomain.com   internet address = 161.58.193.161
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Changed the primary windows nt account

[Soysal, Serdar]

No, just wait 2 hours.  Or do the registry hack that is documented in the
Exchange 5.5 FAQ item 3.46.  

Serdar Soysal


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed the primary windows nt account


Are you using exchange 5.5 if so go into the mailbox properties and change
the primary account back to the old one or check the permissions on the
mailbox of that user.

-Original Message-
From: David Fortuna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Changed the primary windows nt account

I changed the primary windows nt account.  When I tried to change it back to
the original person it works  but that person cannot get into there e-mail
folder, it says they do not have permission.  It shows there name as the
primary Windows NT account. Does it take time to sync?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SMTP 550 Error

[Tom Meunier]

Go punch it into http://relays.osirusoft.com/cgi-bin/rbcheck.cgi

Then go get it removed from http://xbl.selward.cx 

That's a start.

> -Original Message-
> From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:30 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: SMTP 550 Error
> Subject: Re: SMTP 550 Error
> 
> 
> I did munge the info.
> 
> mail.kacpi.com
> 216.141.241.124
> 
> 
> 
> "Beaten paths are for beaten men."
> Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer.
> 
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:09 AM
> Subject: RE: SMTP 550 Error
> 
> 
> I'd say it's a DNS problem, as the 216.xxx.xxx.xxx does not 
> accurately reflect the public DNS info for ourdomain.com.  
> Unless you're just munging the info.  It's public info anyway 
> - don't munge it, it makes troubleshooting a PITA.
> 
> 
> Non-authoritative answer:
> ourdomain.com   MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = ourdomain.com
> 
> ourdomain.com   internet address = 161.58.193.161
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Metric reporting

[Andrey Fyodorov]

Mine now craps out while importing distribution lists, toward the end of
that import.

-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


I just started using it today.  It doesn't seem to run slow to me, but I
have nothing to compare it against.  Love the amount of information I can
get from it!



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 X194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  


-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


it does seem to run slow on our machine too, but I was thinking it was the
box itself...plus we have some other things running on that machine.  I am
happy with the product (and support) though.
dave

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Do you think that Promodag retrieves Tracking and Directory info slow?  It
runs extremely slow on my machine.  

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Never mind. Figured it out. One of my administrative groups does not have
any servers and happens to be first alphabetically. Promodag did not like
that and crapped out right away. After I renamed the admin group and dropped
it down to the bottom of the alphabet Promodag ran fine

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


So any Promodag specialists here? :)

I installed a trial version and it is refusing to connect to my domain
controllers.

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Promodag Reports does an excellent job, IMHO.

www.promodag.com

Jim Blunt

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Take a look at NetIQ App Ann for Exchange

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Metric reporting

I need a good program to measure exchange traffic of all kinds in and out of
our org.  Any good ones out there?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:   

RE: Metric reporting

[Bob Sadler]

I just started using it today.  It doesn't seem to run slow to me, but I have nothing 
to compare it against.  Love the amount of information I can get from it!



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 X194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  


-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


it does seem to run slow on our machine too, but I was thinking it was the
box itself...plus we have some other things running on that machine.  I am
happy with the product (and support) though.
dave

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Do you think that Promodag retrieves Tracking and Directory info slow?  It
runs extremely slow on my machine.  

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Never mind. Figured it out. One of my administrative groups does not have
any servers and happens to be first alphabetically. Promodag did not like
that and crapped out right away. After I renamed the admin group and dropped
it down to the bottom of the alphabet Promodag ran fine

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


So any Promodag specialists here? :)

I installed a trial version and it is refusing to connect to my domain
controllers.

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Promodag Reports does an excellent job, IMHO.

www.promodag.com

Jim Blunt

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Take a look at NetIQ App Ann for Exchange

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Metric reporting

I need a good program to measure exchange traffic of all kinds in and out of
our org.  Any good ones out there?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Antigen Question

[Durkee, Peter]

Not really. I have noticed, however, that the Antigen 6.5 client seems to run 
noticibly faster when it's running on some machine other than the server. 

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 5:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Antigen Question


Speaking of 6.5, I installed it on one of my servers and the Antigen GUI is
extremely slow. Is that normal?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 6:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Antigen Question


We had a similar problem about a month ago.  The support I received from
them was outstanding.  Here is what they suggested I do:

Try using our ftp site instead of the http site: If you right mouse click
on the Network update path, select ftp and it will automatically change to
the FTP site for download for your engines and then click update now.
If that does not work then modify the registry value that holds the timeout
setting:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Sybari Software\6.0\EngineDownloadTimeout

This value is measured in seconds and is set to 120 (decimal) by default.
Changing it to 300 (5 minutes) usually resolved any timeout problems.  Keep
in mind this registry change, the Antigen and Exchange services DON'T
require restarting.

The default timeout has been changed to 300 seconds in Antigen 6.5. 

Hope this helps.

-Original Message-
From: Sandhya Pai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Antigen Question


Hello Antigen users,

I have Exchange 5.5 on NT 4 server.  I am using Antigen 6.2 for Exchange.
We've been using Antigen for over a year and just about 2 months we started
having problems with automatic update feature.  It runs into problems with
renaming directories.  To fix the problem, I have to stop Exchange, reboot
the server and then rename the directories.  It's very frustrating because I
can only do this on Weekend.  I've tried their tech support and they keep
giving me directions for manual update (mentioned above).  I've even
uninstalled and reinstalled the software but with no use.

Any help will be appreciated.

Sandhya

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SMTP 550 Error

[Chris H]

not an XCHPRO ;) DNS is prob my weakest area, where I suspect this is
headed.
We also have a similair problem sending email to aol.com addresses. No
denial message they just never get there (no jokes about sending mail to
aol.com; I know, I know ;)

AOL said it was due to 1 server that did not have a PTR record associated
with it. So I had that created by our ISP and it worked for a week and then
died again. These are the problems I love. ;)

Thanks!

PS He thank you.

"Beaten paths are for beaten men."
Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer.


- Original Message -
From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:22 AM
Subject: RE: SMTP 550 Error


But (s)he's an NTPro.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP 550 Error


I'd say it's a DNS problem, as the 216.xxx.xxx.xxx does not accurately
reflect the public DNS info for ourdomain.com.  Unless you're just
munging the info.  It's public info anyway - don't munge it, it makes
troubleshooting a PITA.


Non-authoritative answer:
ourdomain.com   MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = ourdomain.com

ourdomain.com   internet address = 161.58.193.161


> -Original Message-
> From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Monday, May 06, 2002 09:58 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: SMTP 550 Error
> Subject: SMTP 550 Error
>
>
> I am getting this error sending to one domain:
>
> The original message was received at Thu, 2 May 2002 13:05:49
> -0400 (EDT) from mail.ourdomain.com [216.xxx.xxx.xxx]
>
> - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors
> - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> (reason: 550 Access denied)
>
> The definition I find for SMTP 550 is that the user is
> unknown or the account does not exist.
>
> However, if I send from hotmail or yahoo as a test, the mail
> gets to the user no problems. Access denied does not sound
> like an error with locating the user name/account by their
> recieving server. it sounds more like they are not accepting
> incoming mail from us for some reason. I do not see our
> domain blacklisted in ORBS or anything similair using Sam
> Spade to check their databases.
>
>
> "Beaten paths are for beaten men."
> Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer.
>
>
>
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Metric reporting

[Stevens, Dave]

it does seem to run slow on our machine too, but I was thinking it was the
box itself...plus we have some other things running on that machine.  I am
happy with the product (and support) though.
dave

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Do you think that Promodag retrieves Tracking and Directory info slow?  It
runs extremely slow on my machine.  

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Never mind. Figured it out. One of my administrative groups does not have
any servers and happens to be first alphabetically. Promodag did not like
that and crapped out right away. After I renamed the admin group and dropped
it down to the bottom of the alphabet Promodag ran fine

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


So any Promodag specialists here? :)

I installed a trial version and it is refusing to connect to my domain
controllers.

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Promodag Reports does an excellent job, IMHO.

www.promodag.com

Jim Blunt

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Take a look at NetIQ App Ann for Exchange

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Metric reporting

I need a good program to measure exchange traffic of all kinds in and out of
our org.  Any good ones out there?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Changed the primary windows nt account

[Couch, Nate]

Yes.

> --
> From: David Fortuna
> Reply To: Exchange Discussions
> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2002 10:30
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:  Changed the primary windows nt account
> 
> I changed the primary windows nt account.  When I tried to change it back
> to the original person it works  but that person cannot get into there
> e-mail folder, it says they do not have permission.  It shows there name
> as the primary Windows NT account.
> Does it take time to sync?
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Changed the primary windows nt account

[Tener, Richard]

Are you using exchange 5.5 if so go into the mailbox properties and change
the primary account back to the old one or check the permissions on the
mailbox of that user.

-Original Message-
From: David Fortuna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Changed the primary windows nt account

I changed the primary windows nt account.  When I tried to change it back
to the original person it works  but that person cannot get into there
e-mail folder, it says they do not have permission.  It shows there name
as the primary Windows NT account.
Does it take time to sync?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Changed the primary windows nt account

[Jan Wilson]

Up to 120 minutes


>Does it take time to sync?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SMTP 550 Error

[Chris H]

I did munge the info.

mail.kacpi.com
216.141.241.124



"Beaten paths are for beaten men."
Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer.


- Original Message - 
From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:09 AM
Subject: RE: SMTP 550 Error


I'd say it's a DNS problem, as the 216.xxx.xxx.xxx does not accurately
reflect the public DNS info for ourdomain.com.  Unless you're just
munging the info.  It's public info anyway - don't munge it, it makes
troubleshooting a PITA.


Non-authoritative answer:
ourdomain.com   MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = ourdomain.com

ourdomain.com   internet address = 161.58.193.161


> -Original Message-
> From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Monday, May 06, 2002 09:58 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: SMTP 550 Error
> Subject: SMTP 550 Error
> 
> 
> I am getting this error sending to one domain:
> 
> The original message was received at Thu, 2 May 2002 13:05:49 
> -0400 (EDT) from mail.ourdomain.com [216.xxx.xxx.xxx]
> 
> - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors 
> - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> (reason: 550 Access denied)
> 
> The definition I find for SMTP 550 is that the user is 
> unknown or the account does not exist.
> 
> However, if I send from hotmail or yahoo as a test, the mail 
> gets to the user no problems. Access denied does not sound 
> like an error with locating the user name/account by their 
> recieving server. it sounds more like they are not accepting 
> incoming mail from us for some reason. I do not see our 
> domain blacklisted in ORBS or anything similair using Sam 
> Spade to check their databases.
> 
> 
> "Beaten paths are for beaten men."
> Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Changed the primary windows nt account

[David Fortuna]

I changed the primary windows nt account.  When I tried to change it back
to the original person it works  but that person cannot get into there
e-mail folder, it says they do not have permission.  It shows there name
as the primary Windows NT account.
Does it take time to sync?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Metric reporting

[Woodruff, Michael]

Do you think that Promodag retrieves Tracking and Directory info slow?  It
runs extremely slow on my machine.  

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Never mind. Figured it out. One of my administrative groups does not have
any servers and happens to be first alphabetically. Promodag did not like
that and crapped out right away. After I renamed the admin group and dropped
it down to the bottom of the alphabet Promodag ran fine

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


So any Promodag specialists here? :)

I installed a trial version and it is refusing to connect to my domain
controllers.

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Promodag Reports does an excellent job, IMHO.

www.promodag.com

Jim Blunt

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Take a look at NetIQ App Ann for Exchange

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Metric reporting

I need a good program to measure exchange traffic of all kinds in and out of
our org.  Any good ones out there?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SMTP 550 Error

[William Lefkovics]

But (s)he's an NTPro.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP 550 Error


I'd say it's a DNS problem, as the 216.xxx.xxx.xxx does not accurately
reflect the public DNS info for ourdomain.com.  Unless you're just
munging the info.  It's public info anyway - don't munge it, it makes
troubleshooting a PITA.


Non-authoritative answer:
ourdomain.com   MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = ourdomain.com

ourdomain.com   internet address = 161.58.193.161


> -Original Message-
> From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Monday, May 06, 2002 09:58 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: SMTP 550 Error
> Subject: SMTP 550 Error
> 
> 
> I am getting this error sending to one domain:
> 
> The original message was received at Thu, 2 May 2002 13:05:49
> -0400 (EDT) from mail.ourdomain.com [216.xxx.xxx.xxx]
> 
> - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors
> - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> (reason: 550 Access denied)
> 
> The definition I find for SMTP 550 is that the user is
> unknown or the account does not exist.
> 
> However, if I send from hotmail or yahoo as a test, the mail
> gets to the user no problems. Access denied does not sound 
> like an error with locating the user name/account by their 
> recieving server. it sounds more like they are not accepting 
> incoming mail from us for some reason. I do not see our 
> domain blacklisted in ORBS or anything similair using Sam 
> Spade to check their databases.
> 
> 
> "Beaten paths are for beaten men."
> Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Metric reporting

[Andrey Fyodorov]

Never mind. Figured it out. One of my administrative groups does not have
any servers and happens to be first alphabetically. Promodag did not like
that and crapped out right away. After I renamed the admin group and dropped
it down to the bottom of the alphabet Promodag ran fine

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


So any Promodag specialists here? :)

I installed a trial version and it is refusing to connect to my domain
controllers.

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Promodag Reports does an excellent job, IMHO.

www.promodag.com

Jim Blunt

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Take a look at NetIQ App Ann for Exchange

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Metric reporting

I need a good program to measure exchange traffic of all kinds in and
out of
our org.  Any good ones out there?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SMTP 550 Error

[Hansen, Eric]

Isnt 550 the relay denied message?

-Original Message-
From: Jerzy Setmajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: SMTP 550 Error


Sounds like they're blocking you.
Try connecting via telnet on port25 to see what gives.
Jerzy
> 
> From: "Chris H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2002/05/06 Mon AM 10:58:22 EDT
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: SMTP 550 Error
> 
> I am getting this error sending to one domain:
> 
> The original message was received at Thu, 2 May 2002 13:05:49 -0400 
> (EDT) from mail.ourdomain.com [216.xxx.xxx.xxx]
> 
> - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> (reason: 550 Access denied)
> 
> The definition I find for SMTP 550 is that the user is unknown or the 
> account does not exist.
> 
> However, if I send from hotmail or yahoo as a test, the mail gets to 
> the user no problems. Access denied does not sound like an error with 
> locating the user name/account by their recieving server. it sounds 
> more like they are not accepting incoming mail from us for some 
> reason. I do not see our domain blacklisted in ORBS or anything 
> similair using Sam Spade to check their databases.
> 
> 
> "Beaten paths are for beaten men."
> Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SMTP 550 Error

[Jerzy Setmajer]

Sounds like they're blocking you.
Try connecting via telnet on port25 to see what gives.
Jerzy
> 
> From: "Chris H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2002/05/06 Mon AM 10:58:22 EDT
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: SMTP 550 Error
> 
> I am getting this error sending to one domain:
> 
> The original message was received at Thu, 2 May 2002 13:05:49 -0400 (EDT)
> from mail.ourdomain.com [216.xxx.xxx.xxx]
> 
> - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> (reason: 550 Access denied)
> 
> The definition I find for SMTP 550 is that the user is unknown or the
> account does not exist.
> 
> However, if I send from hotmail or yahoo as a test, the mail gets to the
> user no problems. Access denied does not sound like an error with locating
> the user name/account by their recieving server. it sounds more like they
> are not accepting incoming mail from us for some reason. I do not see our
> domain blacklisted in ORBS or anything similair using Sam Spade to check
> their databases.
> 
> 
> "Beaten paths are for beaten men."
> Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SMTP 550 Error

[Tom Meunier]

I'd say it's a DNS problem, as the 216.xxx.xxx.xxx does not accurately
reflect the public DNS info for ourdomain.com.  Unless you're just
munging the info.  It's public info anyway - don't munge it, it makes
troubleshooting a PITA.


Non-authoritative answer:
ourdomain.com   MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = ourdomain.com

ourdomain.com   internet address = 161.58.193.161


> -Original Message-
> From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Monday, May 06, 2002 09:58 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: SMTP 550 Error
> Subject: SMTP 550 Error
> 
> 
> I am getting this error sending to one domain:
> 
> The original message was received at Thu, 2 May 2002 13:05:49 
> -0400 (EDT) from mail.ourdomain.com [216.xxx.xxx.xxx]
> 
> - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors 
> - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> (reason: 550 Access denied)
> 
> The definition I find for SMTP 550 is that the user is 
> unknown or the account does not exist.
> 
> However, if I send from hotmail or yahoo as a test, the mail 
> gets to the user no problems. Access denied does not sound 
> like an error with locating the user name/account by their 
> recieving server. it sounds more like they are not accepting 
> incoming mail from us for some reason. I do not see our 
> domain blacklisted in ORBS or anything similair using Sam 
> Spade to check their databases.
> 
> 
> "Beaten paths are for beaten men."
> Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Acitve Dierctory Connector Version

[Pennell, Ronald B.]

 I Installed the ADC from the Ex2K CD  and setup my connection agreements I
noticed that all the "mailbox's" for users
in the "receipients container" came over as "mail enabled users"..  Mailbox
info came over OK for users in other containers.

Was this due to not having the ADC from the SP2 CD installed?  If so, can I
just reinstall SP2 to get the latest version?
Perhaps it is just another problem - 

Help & Thanks

Ron

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

SMTP 550 Error

[Chris H]

I am getting this error sending to one domain:

The original message was received at Thu, 2 May 2002 13:05:49 -0400 (EDT)
from mail.ourdomain.com [216.xxx.xxx.xxx]

- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

(reason: 550 Access denied)

The definition I find for SMTP 550 is that the user is unknown or the
account does not exist.

However, if I send from hotmail or yahoo as a test, the mail gets to the
user no problems. Access denied does not sound like an error with locating
the user name/account by their recieving server. it sounds more like they
are not accepting incoming mail from us for some reason. I do not see our
domain blacklisted in ORBS or anything similair using Sam Spade to check
their databases.


"Beaten paths are for beaten men."
Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer.





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Metric reporting

[Andrey Fyodorov]

So any Promodag specialists here? :)

I installed a trial version and it is refusing to connect to my domain
controllers.

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Promodag Reports does an excellent job, IMHO.

www.promodag.com

Jim Blunt

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Take a look at NetIQ App Ann for Exchange

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Metric reporting

I need a good program to measure exchange traffic of all kinds in and
out of
our org.  Any good ones out there?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exchange 2000 and MS Mail

[Karen McLaughlin]

I didn't realize it was a service in 5.5, either.  I guess I haven't
done DirStink with MS Mail since 4.0 or 5.0...

The client definitely wants to implement dir sync, and we're going
to rearchitect it so that the Exchange server becomes the dirsync
server and that the 4 MS Mail PO's are requestors.  Eventually, all
sites will be W2K/Ex2K but not for a bit...

Cheers,
Karen 



On Sat, 4 May 2002, Murray Alexander wrote:

> The "MS Mail Interchange" service is not new for E2K; it exists in EX5.5,
> too. Any idea on how it got set to "Manual" startup? When I installed the
> EX5.5 version, it got set to "Automatic".
> 
> Do you plan to implement "Directory Synchronization", the service that will
> trade addresses between MS Mail and Exchange? If so, how many MS Mail
> postoffices do you have? How is the routing organized? DirSync has some firm
> ideas on how routing should be done; if you go along with them, DirSync
> works very well.
> 
> That's not to say that I'd recommend it, though. If you're migrating - and
> you should be - it probably isn't worth while. However, if you already have
> DirSync running, it might help your users if you integrate with Exchange.
> 
> You may find that it's enough to trade directory import/export files between
> the two. It's labor-intensive, but it works.
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Karen McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 5:47 AM
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 and MS Mail
> 
> 
> > Yes indeed.  And it does work!  However, they have added a new service
> > for the shadow postoffice that is set to MANUAL - so don't be a dork
> > like me and not start the service.  It's called MS Mail Interchange.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Karen
> >
> > On Fri, 3 May 2002, Stephen Mynhier wrote:
> >
> > > E2k has an MSMail connector ewww
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Posted At: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:10 AM
> > > Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
> > > Conversation: Exchange 2000 and MS Mail
> > > Subject: Exchange 2000 and MS Mail
> > >
> > >
> > > I didn't see a response to my earlier post, so I'll ask a quick question
> > > now...
> > >
> > > Is the MS Mail Connector compatible with Exchange 2000, or do I need an
> > > Exchange 5.5 server with the MS Mail Connector and ADC to Exchange 2000?
> > >
> > > - Karen
> > >
> > >
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Ximian & Exchange 2000

[Chris Scharff]

I'd much rather use a mail client than OWA as my regular method of access.

> -Original Message-
> From: Jerzy Setmajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:10 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Ximian & Exchange 2000
> 
> 
> Why not use OWA?
> > 
> > From: tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2002/05/03 Fri PM 03:07:42 EDT
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Ximian & Exchange 2000
> > 
> > Hoping I don't get flamed for this, but here goes.
> > 
> > I've got a shop with numerous Linux users, but we also use exchange.
> > 
> > I'm tired of the IMAP mess and want to enable them to 
> participate in 
> > the calendaring, etc. that exchange provides.  My question is, has 
> > anyone tried the GNOME (Ximian) Evolution software with 
> exchange 2000 
> > connector?
> > 
> > If so, what are some of the bugs/pitfalls that you've 
> experienced?  I 
> > don't want to waste a lot of time if it's not ready for prime time 
> > yet.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Tom
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cerification question

[Chris Scharff]

Isn't there a swynk list dedicated to certification banter?

> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:27 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Cerification question
> 
> 
> Why do we go through this every three to six months?  
> 
> William 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> Soysal, Serdar
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:55 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Cerification question
> 
> 
> Certs are not a sign of competency.  They just mean that the 
> person is capable of memorizing braindumps.  I interviewed 
> MCSEs that answered the question "Explain your NT domain 
> structure in your previous job" with an answer like "We had 
> ATM coming to the back of our PCs".  You've got to be careful 
> with MCSEs that come with huge resumes.  There are some ways 
> you can tell if they're good or not though.  For example if 
> the candidate writes MCSE with a larger font than his own 
> name, you probably have a clueless wall-licker in your hands.
> 
> If a person doesn't have certification, it means that he/she 
> has not sat through the tests.  That person can be the most 
> knowledgeable guy out there.
> 
> 
> Serdar Soysal
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Cerification question
> 
> 
> That guy is a knucklehead. The "Best Cert" is the one you 
> need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I 
> have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that 
> industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, 
> Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we 
> were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do 
> it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the 
> knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is 
> that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set.
> 
> I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I 
> hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but 
> he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he 
> wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more 
> experience and never took the time to educate themselves in 
> their chosen craft.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Cerification question
> 
> 
> Don't invite that speaker again.
> 
> Serdar Soysal
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Cerification question
> 
> 
> There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( 
> and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was 
> going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE 
> ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the 
> speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation 
> starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference?
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Metric reporting

[Chris Scharff]

www.messageone.com


> -Original Message-
> From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:57 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Metric reporting
> 
> 
> I need a good program to measure exchange traffic of all 
> kinds in and out of our org.  Any good ones out there?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Metric reporting

[Andrey Fyodorov]

Hmmm, I just downloaded a trial version of Melia and it seemed to have
talked OK to an Exchange 2000 server. Well, there is nothing very
sophisticated in talking to the message tracking logs I guess. But it
downloaded the GAL correctly too.

However the reports look very confused and many of them do not display
anything.

Too bad. It is a great tool for 5.5.

-Original Message-
From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting


Melia is a wonderful program, but unfortunately it doesn't support
Exchange 2000 :(

Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: +351 967819600


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: sexta-feira, 3 de Maio de 2002 16:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Metric reporting

Melia Cameo

NetIQ

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Metric reporting


I need a good program to measure exchange traffic of all kinds in and
out of
our org.  Any good ones out there?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Antigen Question

[Andrey Fyodorov]

Speaking of 6.5, I installed it on one of my servers and the Antigen GUI is
extremely slow. Is that normal?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 6:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Antigen Question


We had a similar problem about a month ago.  The support I received from
them was outstanding.  Here is what they suggested I do:

Try using our ftp site instead of the http site: If you right mouse click
on the Network update path, select ftp and it will automatically change to
the FTP site for download for your engines and then click update now.
If that does not work then modify the registry value that holds the timeout
setting:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Sybari Software\6.0\EngineDownloadTimeout

This value is measured in seconds and is set to 120 (decimal) by default.
Changing it to 300 (5 minutes) usually resolved any timeout problems.  Keep
in mind this registry change, the Antigen and Exchange services DON'T
require restarting.

The default timeout has been changed to 300 seconds in Antigen 6.5. 

Hope this helps.

-Original Message-
From: Sandhya Pai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Antigen Question


Hello Antigen users,

I have Exchange 5.5 on NT 4 server.  I am using Antigen 6.2 for Exchange.
We've been using Antigen for over a year and just about 2 months we started
having problems with automatic update feature.  It runs into problems with
renaming directories.  To fix the problem, I have to stop Exchange, reboot
the server and then rename the directories.  It's very frustrating because I
can only do this on Weekend.  I've tried their tech support and they keep
giving me directions for manual update (mentioned above).  I've even
uninstalled and reinstalled the software but with no use.

Any help will be appreciated.

Sandhya

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

NT4.0 upgrade to W2k

[Pennell, Ronald B.]

Preparing to upgrade my NT4.0 SP5  / Exchange 5.5 server SP4 (1st server in
site) to Windows 2000.  Why, it is the only remaining
DBC in my W2K domain and need to go to "native mode" for exchange 2000
server rollouts.

Anyone have any problems with preforming upgrades on a Exchange Box?

Should I be at SP 6a on the NT side?


Also, running a site connector to another site running Ex5.5...  

Will I need to rebuild the site connector when I install my 1st Exchange
2000 server OR after removing the
1st Ex5.5 server that connects both sites?  

Does the site connector stay in-tack and not affected by the ADC until I
remove the 1st server?  

Thanks

Ron




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: any news on sp3?

[Bob Sadler]

I am so glad I'm drinking water this morning.  It's much easier to clean
off my screen.



Thanks for the morning laugh as usual Andy,

Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 X194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  


-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 6:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?



I've been waiting,
for a GAL like you,
to come into my life.
Yea, waiting, for SP2
to make me feel alive.



-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


What year?

Might it require Windows2000 sp3?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


July is the target date

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: any news on sp3?


Ok... I lost my page a while back in the book known as "waiting for the
service pack".

Anyone seen anything anywhere about ex2ksp3?  info?  target date?

Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: any news on sp3?

[Myles, Damian]

Or 'My GAL's mad at me' from Madness ?

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 May 2002 13:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?



I've been waiting,
for a GAL like you,
to come into my life.
Yea, waiting, for SP2
to make me feel alive.



-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


What year?

Might it require Windows2000 sp3?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


July is the target date

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: any news on sp3?


Ok... I lost my page a while back in the book known as "waiting for the
service pack".

Anyone seen anything anywhere about ex2ksp3?  info?  target date?

Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange 5.5 Port 110 binding only to local host

[Andy David]

What makes you think its not?
So, when you do netstat -a , doesnt it show your machine listening on 110?


-Original Message-
From: Fred Macondray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 Port 110 binding only to local host


Hi All,

I've got an exchange 5.5 server that has port 110
listening only on 127.0.0.1.  How can I change the
binding of the port to listen on the system's primary
IP?

Thanks in advance,
Fred

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: any news on sp3?

[Andy David]

I've been waiting,
for a GAL like you,
to come into my life.
Yea, waiting, for SP2
to make me feel alive.



-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


What year?

Might it require Windows2000 sp3?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


July is the target date

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: any news on sp3?


Ok... I lost my page a while back in the book known as "waiting for the
service pack".

Anyone seen anything anywhere about ex2ksp3?  info?  target date?

Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Antigen Question

[ExchangeDiscussion]

We had a similar problem about a month ago.  The support I received from
them was outstanding.  Here is what they suggested I do:

Try using our ftp site instead of the http site: If you right mouse click
on the Network update path, select ftp and it will automatically change to
the FTP site for download for your engines and then click update now.
If that does not work then modify the registry value that holds the timeout
setting:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Sybari Software\6.0\EngineDownloadTimeout

This value is measured in seconds and is set to 120 (decimal) by default.
Changing it to 300 (5 minutes) usually resolved any timeout problems.  Keep
in mind this registry change, the Antigen and Exchange services DON'T
require restarting.

The default timeout has been changed to 300 seconds in Antigen 6.5. 

Hope this helps.

-Original Message-
From: Sandhya Pai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Antigen Question


Hello Antigen users,

I have Exchange 5.5 on NT 4 server.  I am using Antigen 6.2 for Exchange.
We've been using Antigen for over a year and just about 2 months we started
having problems with automatic update feature.  It runs into problems with
renaming directories.  To fix the problem, I have to stop Exchange, reboot
the server and then rename the directories.  It's very frustrating because I
can only do this on Weekend.  I've tried their tech support and they keep
giving me directions for manual update (mentioned above).  I've even
uninstalled and reinstalled the software but with no use.

Any help will be appreciated.

Sandhya

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: any news on sp3?

[William Lefkovics]

I thought that first part had not been determined yet.  Oh well.

The latter has been the case for a long time.  Still waiting.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen
Mynhier
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 1:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


No, it will not require Win2k SP3.  I am running E2k SP3 on my box just
fine with only Win2k SP2.  In order to run E2k on a .Net server,
however, it will require E2k SP3.


-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:47 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: any news on sp3?
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


What year?

Might it require Windows2000 sp3?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


July is the target date

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: any news on sp3?


Ok... I lost my page a while back in the book known as "waiting for the
service pack".

Anyone seen anything anywhere about ex2ksp3?  info?  target date?

Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: any news on sp3?

[Stephen Mynhier]

No, it will not require Win2k SP3.  I am running E2k SP3 on my box just
fine with only Win2k SP2.  In order to run E2k on a .Net server,
however, it will require E2k SP3.


-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:47 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: any news on sp3?
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


What year?

Might it require Windows2000 sp3?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?


July is the target date

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: any news on sp3?


Ok... I lost my page a while back in the book known as "waiting for the
service pack".

Anyone seen anything anywhere about ex2ksp3?  info?  target date?

Thanks.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]