Data Retreival from Exchange Database
Hi, We want to loop through the entire Exchange Database to generate management reports. All items that are overdue or all items with a specific subject should be reported. Is there anyone who can help us... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exmerge Question
1. Use exmerge 3.7.1 (the latest version for Exchange 5.5) to pull the data off of the 5.5 server 2. Use Exmerge for E2K to put the data back into the E2K store. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:41 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exmerge Question Subject: Exmerge Question I have another exchange site connected via a site connector. They have their own domain name, etc. Running ex.5.5. , my side is in mixed mode with an ex2000 server. Trying to moved the other users in our AD along with email accounts. I can create the accounts and create new mailbox's, but, having a time trying to get the data moved. Is there away to user exmerge 2000 and grab their data. Or will emerge for 5.5 work with Ex2000 mailbox's? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 server won't go away
Connect to your E2K server (it's actually the SRS you are connecting to) with the 5.5 admin program. This should allow you to delete the 5.5 server. -Original Message- From: McCullar, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:30 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Exchange 5.5 server won't go away Subject: Exchange 5.5 server won't go away I have removed a 5.5 server from my Ex2K environment. I did not do it the right way and it still shows up in my System Manager. I have search my TechNet to see how to clean it out to no avail. Can someone help? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
STM Question
Morning Admins I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. Thanks Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STM Question
Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question Morning Admins I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. Thanks Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STM Question
Thank you Jeffrey!! It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of beers are on my tap! Tks Sander -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question Morning Admins I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. Thanks Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Routing group bandwidth requirements
What are the typical bandwidth requirements within a routing group. Are there any documented guidelines available? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient policies don't work?
There are two default policies one called Default recipient policy and the other called after the site name of the exchange 5.5 site that we joined when installing the e2k server. The exchange 5.5 site recipient policy is set to the highest priority (we can't change this). I have created a user account in the w2k domain with a value of companyA in the company field of AD users and computers for this account. I created a recipient policy called companyA and set the filter to look for all users and groups with the company name set to companyA and the email address is companyA.com. I have set this to be the primary address. When I hit FIND in the recipient policy the account is found! However the email email address is never set on the account, instead the default email address from the exchange 5.5 site is set. I have checked the filter on this policy and it is set to apply to everyone!? If I am correct, when a recipient policy is found that matches an object no further matches are attempted. Based on this the behaviour is not surprising but I must be missing something as this can not be correct? Any help would be appreciated. Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rules on client and server do not match
Dear All, I have a user who is presented with the above message when attempting to access the rules wizard in Outlook 2000, not sure if that's worded correctly, but he basically gets asked if he wants to keep the client rules or the server rules. He doesn't know what rules he has on the server or on the client, but basically he has some rules moving messages from people in his contacts, to various subfolders within outlook. There are no PST's involved, the info store is on the server. However, he is set up for offline working as it's a laptop. The offline store is up to date He doesn't want to lose any of the rules hes set up, but I'm unsure whether to keep the rules on the server. Its win2k pro, Outlook 2000 on Exchange 5.5 SP3 I've searched technet, but it only suggests solutions for multiple clients accessing a single info store. I've had a look with mdbvu32.exe from the support folder, but as far as I can see, you can only delete rules there Thanks for all advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules on client and server do not match
I usually keep the rules on the server so that even if my Outlook client is running the rules are still being processed by the server that is up 24/7 (I would like to hope ;) ). Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 11:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rules on client and server do not match Dear All, I have a user who is presented with the above message when attempting to access the rules wizard in Outlook 2000, not sure if that's worded correctly, but he basically gets asked if he wants to keep the client rules or the server rules. He doesn't know what rules he has on the server or on the client, but basically he has some rules moving messages from people in his contacts, to various subfolders within outlook. There are no PST's involved, the info store is on the server. However, he is set up for offline working as it's a laptop. The offline store is up to date He doesn't want to lose any of the rules hes set up, but I'm unsure whether to keep the rules on the server. Its win2k pro, Outlook 2000 on Exchange 5.5 SP3 I've searched technet, but it only suggests solutions for multiple clients accessing a single info store. I've had a look with mdbvu32.exe from the support folder, but as far as I can see, you can only delete rules there Thanks for all advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules on client and server do not match
Whoops. That meant to read 'even if my Outlook client is NOT running' Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce Sent: 23 May 2002 12:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules on client and server do not match I usually keep the rules on the server so that even if my Outlook client is running the rules are still being processed by the server that is up 24/7 (I would like to hope ;) ). Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 11:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rules on client and server do not match Dear All, I have a user who is presented with the above message when attempting to access the rules wizard in Outlook 2000, not sure if that's worded correctly, but he basically gets asked if he wants to keep the client rules or the server rules. He doesn't know what rules he has on the server or on the client, but basically he has some rules moving messages from people in his contacts, to various subfolders within outlook. There are no PST's involved, the info store is on the server. However, he is set up for offline working as it's a laptop. The offline store is up to date He doesn't want to lose any of the rules hes set up, but I'm unsure whether to keep the rules on the server. Its win2k pro, Outlook 2000 on Exchange 5.5 SP3 I've searched technet, but it only suggests solutions for multiple clients accessing a single info store. I've had a look with mdbvu32.exe from the support folder, but as far as I can see, you can only delete rules there Thanks for all advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules on client and server do not match
Sorry, yeah that's what we'd want ideally The real problem here, as I seem to have missed in my original question, is that we don't want to lose any of the many rules hes set up if possible -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 12:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules on client and server do not match Whoops. That meant to read 'even if my Outlook client is NOT running' Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce Sent: 23 May 2002 12:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules on client and server do not match I usually keep the rules on the server so that even if my Outlook client is running the rules are still being processed by the server that is up 24/7 (I would like to hope ;) ). Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 11:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rules on client and server do not match Dear All, I have a user who is presented with the above message when attempting to access the rules wizard in Outlook 2000, not sure if that's worded correctly, but he basically gets asked if he wants to keep the client rules or the server rules. He doesn't know what rules he has on the server or on the client, but basically he has some rules moving messages from people in his contacts, to various subfolders within outlook. There are no PST's involved, the info store is on the server. However, he is set up for offline working as it's a laptop. The offline store is up to date He doesn't want to lose any of the rules hes set up, but I'm unsure whether to keep the rules on the server. Its win2k pro, Outlook 2000 on Exchange 5.5 SP3 I've searched technet, but it only suggests solutions for multiple clients accessing a single info store. I've had a look with mdbvu32.exe from the support folder, but as far as I can see, you can only delete rules there Thanks for all advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules on client and server do not match
You can get this message also if you have two different versions of Outlook accessing the same mailbox. If you are worried about losing any rules, export them out before you decide whether to keep the server or client rules. You can always import then back in later if necessary. When you get that dialog box, choose either Server or Client, then click on the Options button to Export the rules. Click Cancel to back out completely from the dialog box! Open the Rules Wizard again, then make your choice whether server or client, then hit OK to save your choice. If you have lost some rules in the process, import them back in from the saved .rwz in the previous step. I would typically expect you would select server for consistency's sake. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules on client and server do not match Sorry, yeah that's what we'd want ideally The real problem here, as I seem to have missed in my original question, is that we don't want to lose any of the many rules hes set up if possible -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 12:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules on client and server do not match Whoops. That meant to read 'even if my Outlook client is NOT running' Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce Sent: 23 May 2002 12:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules on client and server do not match I usually keep the rules on the server so that even if my Outlook client is running the rules are still being processed by the server that is up 24/7 (I would like to hope ;) ). Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 11:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rules on client and server do not match Dear All, I have a user who is presented with the above message when attempting to access the rules wizard in Outlook 2000, not sure if that's worded correctly, but he basically gets asked if he wants to keep the client rules or the server rules. He doesn't know what rules he has on the server or on the client, but basically he has some rules moving messages from people in his contacts, to various subfolders within outlook. There are no PST's involved, the info store is on the server. However, he is set up for offline working as it's a laptop. The offline store is up to date He doesn't want to lose any of the rules hes set up, but I'm unsure whether to keep the rules on the server. Its win2k pro, Outlook 2000 on Exchange 5.5 SP3 I've searched technet, but it only suggests solutions for multiple clients accessing a single info store. I've had a look with mdbvu32.exe from the support folder, but as far as I can see, you can only delete rules there Thanks for all advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Found out how to create an exchange mailbox!
Great. Please set your sensitivity to normal. Cripes. -Original Message- From: Robert WALKER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Found out how to create an exchange mailbox! Sensitivity: Confidential Hi, I eventually worked out what I was doing wrong and have got it to work. That is creating a mailbox for exchange. Fairly Simple really. dim obj as iadscontainer dim mobj as cdoexm.imailboxstore set obj = getobject(LDAP://; Server /cn= UserName _ cn=users Domain ' as dc=x,dc=y,dc=z ' Your site as in x.y.z eg host.microsoft.com set mobj = obj ' overlay mailbox to user container. mobj.createmailbox LDAP://cn=mailbox store ( exServer ) _ cn=first storage group,cn=information store, _ cn= exserver ,cn=servers, _ cn=first administration group,cn=administrative group, _ cn= ExchangeOrganization ,cn=microsoft exchange, _ cn=services,cn=configuration, Domain ' Exchange Organization appears in Exchange system managers ' Exchange Server is the targeted exchange box to create mailbox obj.setinfo ' write cached data back to active directory. set obj = nothing set mobj = nothing There you have it! Quite simple really. Robert. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Group Mail
Andy wasn't fast enough to the Send button, and he'd conditioned me to the response so well I had to send it myself. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Group Mail Andy? -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Group Mail ! fsck. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Group Mail It is a candy bar. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Group Mail Pardon me Chris, but what does fsck mean? I am new to this list and Exchange. I checked the resource kit and it is not mentioned there. TIA --Felicity What the fsck is a Group Mail Pro? Is it too much to ask for a properly phrased technical question once in a while? Christ on cracker you people... -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Group Mail How exactly does Group Mail Pro send without and SMTP server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Speed
I'm new to this organization. Currently we have nine Exchange 5.5 servers (450 users) scattered around the country. They're all connected to the Exchange server at our headquarters in Philadelphia. All Internet mail goes through the Philadelphia connection. All the remote sites are connected to us, through the Internet, at various speeds, the fastest being some level of DSL. We're just at the beginning stages of moving our NT- and Exchange 5.5-based network to Win2k and Ex2k. One of the ideas being considered is to consolidate the 9 different Exchange servers into one server housed in Philadelphia. So my questions are: 1. What is the minimum speed you would suggest the remote sites be connected to us? (They'll be using Outlook.) 2. Is it a good idea? We're trying to lower the administrative overhead, and simplify the network. Thanks for your input, Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rob Moore, MCSE American Friends Service Committee IT Department [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Speed
How many users in each office? -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Speed I'm new to this organization. Currently we have nine Exchange 5.5 servers (450 users) scattered around the country. They're all connected to the Exchange server at our headquarters in Philadelphia. All Internet mail goes through the Philadelphia connection. All the remote sites are connected to us, through the Internet, at various speeds, the fastest being some level of DSL. We're just at the beginning stages of moving our NT- and Exchange 5.5-based network to Win2k and Ex2k. One of the ideas being considered is to consolidate the 9 different Exchange servers into one server housed in Philadelphia. So my questions are: 1. What is the minimum speed you would suggest the remote sites be connected to us? (They'll be using Outlook.) 2. Is it a good idea? We're trying to lower the administrative overhead, and simplify the network. Thanks for your input, Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rob Moore, MCSE American Friends Service Committee IT Department [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Speed
Well, explain exactly what they will be needing. Do they use all the cool bells and whistles that E2K offers? Or are they just wanting email and calendar? If the later, why not just let them use OWA to get to your exchange box and then you don't need to worry about them using Outlook. On the other hand if you are using all the cool things E2K has to offer, doing work collaboration, instant messaging, etc., then they will need to use Outlook. I can tell you that I have ran tests with our system and my cable connection from home, and can make Outlook work fine, but it is a bit slow. Not for me, but for my users who are used to instant likity split connections. If your users need the same type of thing, T1's are great, but if that's the only thing you are using a T1 for, then it might be a bit much. Overall, ask yourself the question, what do your users need? Can they get by with OWA? If they can, just let them do that, otherwise, ask yourself what level of speed can my users take. Good Luck, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Speed I'm new to this organization. Currently we have nine Exchange 5.5 servers (450 users) scattered around the country. They're all connected to the Exchange server at our headquarters in Philadelphia. All Internet mail goes through the Philadelphia connection. All the remote sites are connected to us, through the Internet, at various speeds, the fastest being some level of DSL. We're just at the beginning stages of moving our NT- and Exchange 5.5-based network to Win2k and Ex2k. One of the ideas being considered is to consolidate the 9 different Exchange servers into one server housed in Philadelphia. So my questions are: 1. What is the minimum speed you would suggest the remote sites be connected to us? (They'll be using Outlook.) 2. Is it a good idea? We're trying to lower the administrative overhead, and simplify the network. Thanks for your input, Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rob Moore, MCSE American Friends Service Committee IT Department [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Speed
It varies. Something like 10-20 per office. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Speed How many users in each office? -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Speed I'm new to this organization. Currently we have nine Exchange 5.5 servers (450 users) scattered around the country. They're all connected to the Exchange server at our headquarters in Philadelphia. All Internet mail goes through the Philadelphia connection. All the remote sites are connected to us, through the Internet, at various speeds, the fastest being some level of DSL. We're just at the beginning stages of moving our NT- and Exchange 5.5-based network to Win2k and Ex2k. One of the ideas being considered is to consolidate the 9 different Exchange servers into one server housed in Philadelphia. So my questions are: 1. What is the minimum speed you would suggest the remote sites be connected to us? (They'll be using Outlook.) 2. Is it a good idea? We're trying to lower the administrative overhead, and simplify the network. Thanks for your input, Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rob Moore, MCSE American Friends Service Committee IT Department [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Speed
Good questions. I think I'll save 'em to ask myself. (Like I said, I'm new here and the project is still in the planning stages.) At this point, they could probably get by with OWA (especially if it were E2K OWA), except that they're all using Outlook now and might be unhappy with the demotion to OWA. Also, my boss is really hyped about increasing the amount of collaboration that goes on in our organization. So taking away some of those tools (even if they're just potential) might not fly. Your guess about speed is useful. If they stick with DSL-type speeds, it will work, albeit slowly. We have to ask ourselves if the cost of T1s all around is worth it. Thanks! Rob -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Speed Well, explain exactly what they will be needing. Do they use all the cool bells and whistles that E2K offers? Or are they just wanting email and calendar? If the later, why not just let them use OWA to get to your exchange box and then you don't need to worry about them using Outlook. On the other hand if you are using all the cool things E2K has to offer, doing work collaboration, instant messaging, etc., then they will need to use Outlook. I can tell you that I have ran tests with our system and my cable connection from home, and can make Outlook work fine, but it is a bit slow. Not for me, but for my users who are used to instant likity split connections. If your users need the same type of thing, T1's are great, but if that's the only thing you are using a T1 for, then it might be a bit much. Overall, ask yourself the question, what do your users need? Can they get by with OWA? If they can, just let them do that, otherwise, ask yourself what level of speed can my users take. Good Luck, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Speed I'm new to this organization. Currently we have nine Exchange 5.5 servers (450 users) scattered around the country. They're all connected to the Exchange server at our headquarters in Philadelphia. All Internet mail goes through the Philadelphia connection. All the remote sites are connected to us, through the Internet, at various speeds, the fastest being some level of DSL. We're just at the beginning stages of moving our NT- and Exchange 5.5-based network to Win2k and Ex2k. One of the ideas being considered is to consolidate the 9 different Exchange servers into one server housed in Philadelphia. So my questions are: 1. What is the minimum speed you would suggest the remote sites be connected to us? (They'll be using Outlook.) 2. Is it a good idea? We're trying to lower the administrative overhead, and simplify the network. Thanks for your input, Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rob Moore, MCSE American Friends Service Committee IT Department [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Creating Distribution Group for Exchange 2000
Hi all, I am having some problem creating a Distribution Group for Exchange 2000. Hope someone can help me. We have one Domain (Mixed Mode) with 3 Exchange 2000 Server. We created a Group in AD Users and Computers (Global Group; Distribution; mail enabled), the option Hide from Address Book is not selected. The first problem is that after you create this Group, and you check it's properties, the E-mail addresses shows empty. I have waited for two days, and still it was empty. If you manually add a SMTP address you will be able to send mail to members of this group by typing the e-mail address, but this group will not show up in the Address Book. Any suggestion why this is happening?? By the way, SP2 for Exchange and Windows is installed on the system. Best Regards, Michel Fayad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Creating Distribution Group for Exchange 2000
BZZT...I think I see an issue here. You need to make an OU first, then create the DL in the OU you created. I don't think you should be putting stuff into those folders, as they are system folders, and AD assigns stuff to them (or programs do as well) that normally AREN'T shown in the GAL. Try creating an OU, then adding your DL there. I bet that will work :) hth, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Michel Fayad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Creating Distribution Group for Exchange 2000 Hi all, I am having some problem creating a Distribution Group for Exchange 2000. Hope someone can help me. We have one Domain (Mixed Mode) with 3 Exchange 2000 Server. We created a Group in AD Users and Computers (Global Group; Distribution; mail enabled), the option Hide from Address Book is not selected. The first problem is that after you create this Group, and you check it's properties, the E-mail addresses shows empty. I have waited for two days, and still it was empty. If you manually add a SMTP address you will be able to send mail to members of this group by typing the e-mail address, but this group will not show up in the Address Book. Any suggestion why this is happening?? By the way, SP2 for Exchange and Windows is installed on the system. Best Regards, Michel Fayad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Offline syncronization of Public Folders
Exchange 5.5 SP4. Is it possible to sync up public folders locally for notebook users? Phil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Speed
10 users was typically my arbitrary line in the sand so-to-speak. 10 and under we found we could get away with a 56 or 64 Frame Relay connection (We also had them use offline sync) After 10, it was necessary to bump their link to 128, 256 etc... otherwise their speed was noticeably slower. -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Speed Good questions. I think I'll save 'em to ask myself. (Like I said, I'm new here and the project is still in the planning stages.) At this point, they could probably get by with OWA (especially if it were E2K OWA), except that they're all using Outlook now and might be unhappy with the demotion to OWA. Also, my boss is really hyped about increasing the amount of collaboration that goes on in our organization. So taking away some of those tools (even if they're just potential) might not fly. Your guess about speed is useful. If they stick with DSL-type speeds, it will work, albeit slowly. We have to ask ourselves if the cost of T1s all around is worth it. Thanks! Rob -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Speed Well, explain exactly what they will be needing. Do they use all the cool bells and whistles that E2K offers? Or are they just wanting email and calendar? If the later, why not just let them use OWA to get to your exchange box and then you don't need to worry about them using Outlook. On the other hand if you are using all the cool things E2K has to offer, doing work collaboration, instant messaging, etc., then they will need to use Outlook. I can tell you that I have ran tests with our system and my cable connection from home, and can make Outlook work fine, but it is a bit slow. Not for me, but for my users who are used to instant likity split connections. If your users need the same type of thing, T1's are great, but if that's the only thing you are using a T1 for, then it might be a bit much. Overall, ask yourself the question, what do your users need? Can they get by with OWA? If they can, just let them do that, otherwise, ask yourself what level of speed can my users take. Good Luck, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Speed I'm new to this organization. Currently we have nine Exchange 5.5 servers (450 users) scattered around the country. They're all connected to the Exchange server at our headquarters in Philadelphia. All Internet mail goes through the Philadelphia connection. All the remote sites are connected to us, through the Internet, at various speeds, the fastest being some level of DSL. We're just at the beginning stages of moving our NT- and Exchange 5.5-based network to Win2k and Ex2k. One of the ideas being considered is to consolidate the 9 different Exchange servers into one server housed in Philadelphia. So my questions are: 1. What is the minimum speed you would suggest the remote sites be connected to us? (They'll be using Outlook.) 2. Is it a good idea? We're trying to lower the administrative overhead, and simplify the network. Thanks for your input, Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rob Moore, MCSE American Friends Service Committee IT Department [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone
RE: Offline syncronization of Public Folders
Drag them to their favorites in Outlook. -Original Message- From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Offline syncronization of Public Folders Exchange 5.5 SP4. Is it possible to sync up public folders locally for notebook users? Phil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules on client and server do not match
Ah, ok. I knew how to export the rules, but couldn't get to that point without responding to the Client or Server dialog If I can cancel back out after that point without losing the rules, then that should be ok Thanks -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 12:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules on client and server do not match You can get this message also if you have two different versions of Outlook accessing the same mailbox. If you are worried about losing any rules, export them out before you decide whether to keep the server or client rules. You can always import then back in later if necessary. When you get that dialog box, choose either Server or Client, then click on the Options button to Export the rules. Click Cancel to back out completely from the dialog box! Open the Rules Wizard again, then make your choice whether server or client, then hit OK to save your choice. If you have lost some rules in the process, import them back in from the saved .rwz in the previous step. I would typically expect you would select server for consistency's sake. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules on client and server do not match Sorry, yeah that's what we'd want ideally The real problem here, as I seem to have missed in my original question, is that we don't want to lose any of the many rules hes set up if possible -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 12:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules on client and server do not match Whoops. That meant to read 'even if my Outlook client is NOT running' Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce Sent: 23 May 2002 12:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules on client and server do not match I usually keep the rules on the server so that even if my Outlook client is running the rules are still being processed by the server that is up 24/7 (I would like to hope ;) ). Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 11:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rules on client and server do not match Dear All, I have a user who is presented with the above message when attempting to access the rules wizard in Outlook 2000, not sure if that's worded correctly, but he basically gets asked if he wants to keep the client rules or the server rules. He doesn't know what rules he has on the server or on the client, but basically he has some rules moving messages from people in his contacts, to various subfolders within outlook. There are no PST's involved, the info store is on the server. However, he is set up for offline working as it's a laptop. The offline store is up to date He doesn't want to lose any of the rules hes set up, but I'm unsure whether to keep the rules on the server. Its win2k pro, Outlook 2000 on Exchange 5.5 SP3 I've searched technet, but it only suggests solutions for multiple clients accessing a single info store. I've had a look with mdbvu32.exe from the support folder, but as far as I can see, you can only delete rules there Thanks for all advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly
RE: Exchange 5.5 server won't go away
ADSIEdit - wack it from Active Directory at that level. But be careful screwing around with ADSIEdit. It's like playing with the registry, maybe even more dangerous. -Original Message- From: McCullar, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 server won't go away I have removed a 5.5 server from my Ex2K environment. I did not do it the right way and it still shows up in my System Manager. I have search my TechNet to see how to clean it out to no avail. Can someone help? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STM Question
Did you lose any mail? -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Thank you Jeffrey!! It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of beers are on my tap! Tks Sander -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question Morning Admins I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. Thanks Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Group Mail
Goes well after Fu King Chicken -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Group Mail Ill take mine without nuts please -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Group Mail Sometimes you feel like a fsck. Sometimes you don't. -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Group Mail ! fsck. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Group Mail It is a candy bar. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Group Mail Pardon me Chris, but what does fsck mean? I am new to this list and Exchange. I checked the resource kit and it is not mentioned there. TIA --Felicity What the fsck is a Group Mail Pro? Is it too much to ask for a properly phrased technical question once in a while? Christ on cracker you people... -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Group Mail How exactly does Group Mail Pro send without and SMTP server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STM Question
Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so? They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. Tks Sander -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Did you lose any mail? -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Thank you Jeffrey!! It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of beers are on my tap! Tks Sander -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question Morning Admins I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. Thanks Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STM Question
If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. Mark -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so? They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. Tks Sander -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Did you lose any mail? -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Thank you Jeffrey!! It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of beers are on my tap! Tks Sander -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question Morning Admins I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. Thanks Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STM Question
Ok, and since the Store was not mounted, no new content could be added. I think I was lucky and that wasn't by design ...:-) Live and learn! Sander -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. Mark -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so? They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. Tks Sander -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Did you lose any mail? -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Thank you Jeffrey!! It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of beers are on my tap! Tks Sander -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question Morning Admins I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. Thanks Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STM Question
Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any references to it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native format in the Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, a Word Doc as a word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the priv1.edb, but everything else is stored in the STM. I am basing this on what I read and when I open up the priv1.edb and the priv1.stm in notepad. You have to stop the server to be able to do this. I also am looking at the copies of these files in C:\Program Files\Exchsvr\MDBdata. TIA --Felicity If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. Mark -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so? They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. Tks Sander -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Did you lose any mail? -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Thank you Jeffrey!! It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of beers are on my tap! Tks Sander -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question Morning Admins I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. Thanks Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the
RE: STM Question
Q232323 might clear things up a bit. Neil -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 May 2002 14:58 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: STM Question Subject: RE: STM Question Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any references to it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native format in the Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, a Word Doc as a word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the priv1.edb, but everything else is stored in the STM. I am basing this on what I read and when I open up the priv1.edb and the priv1.stm in notepad. You have to stop the server to be able to do this. I also am looking at the copies of these files in C:\Program Files\Exchsvr\MDBdata. TIA --Felicity If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. Mark -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so? They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. Tks Sander -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Did you lose any mail? -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Thank you Jeffrey!! It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of beers are on my tap! Tks Sander -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question Morning Admins I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. Thanks Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC
RE: STM Question
Oooh!! very nice. Thanks Neil! --Felicity Q232323 might clear things up a bit. Neil -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Posted At: 23 May 2002 14:58 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: STM Question Subject: RE: STM Question Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any references to it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native format in the Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, a Word Doc as a word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the priv1.edb, but everything else is stored in the STM. I am basing this on what I read and when I open up the priv1.edb and the priv1.stm in notepad. You have to stop the server to be able to do this. I also am looking at the copies of these files in C:\Program Files\Exchsvr\MDBdata. TIA --Felicity If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all=20 likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments=20 originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a=20 MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with=20 internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI=20 client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. =20 Mark =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb=20 file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been=20 lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so?=20 They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Did you lose any mail? =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Thank you Jeffrey!! =20 It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of=20 beers are on my tap! =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question =20 =20 Morning Admins =20 I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store=20 does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get=20 an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error=20 -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see=20 anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can=20 one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. =20 Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. =20 Thanks =20 Sander =20 =20 =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: STM Question
Did you know that the final Felicity episode aired last night? It is sad to see it go. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Oooh!! very nice. Thanks Neil! --Felicity Q232323 might clear things up a bit. Neil -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Posted At: 23 May 2002 14:58 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: STM Question Subject: RE: STM Question Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any references to it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native format in the Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, a Word Doc as a word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the priv1.edb, but everything else is stored in the STM. I am basing this on what I read and when I open up the priv1.edb and the priv1.stm in notepad. You have to stop the server to be able to do this. I also am looking at the copies of these files in C:\Program Files\Exchsvr\MDBdata. TIA --Felicity If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all=20 likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments=20 originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a=20 MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with=20 internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI=20 client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. =20 Mark =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb=20 file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been=20 lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so?=20 They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Did you lose any mail? =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Thank you Jeffrey!! =20 It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of=20 beers are on my tap! =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question =20 =20 Morning Admins =20 I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store=20 does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get=20 an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error=20 -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see=20 anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can=20 one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. =20 Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. =20 Thanks =20 Sander =20 =20 =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
? about public folders
I hope you can tolerate one more question from me. I have created another storage group, but no-one can see it in Outlook. I am running OutlookXP on my Exchange Server (development Exchange server, not production) and no matter where I set permissions, the new public folder that I created in the new storage group does not show up? How can I make Outlook see it? Can I make Outlook see it? TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STM Question
Can't wait for MAPI to disappear! Then we can have only one database file to worry about. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Q232323 might clear things up a bit. Neil -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 May 2002 14:58 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: STM Question Subject: RE: STM Question Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any references to it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native format in the Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, a Word Doc as a word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the priv1.edb, but everything else is stored in the STM. I am basing this on what I read and when I open up the priv1.edb and the priv1.stm in notepad. You have to stop the server to be able to do this. I also am looking at the copies of these files in C:\Program Files\Exchsvr\MDBdata. TIA --Felicity If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. Mark -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so? They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. Tks Sander -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Did you lose any mail? -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Thank you Jeffrey!! It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of beers are on my tap! Tks Sander -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question Morning Admins I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. Thanks Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: ? about public folders
A new public folder? You mean you've created a new public store/tree? If so, then additional public folder trees are not viewable to MAPI clients, only HTTP. Neil -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 May 2002 15:12 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: ? about public folders Subject: ? about public folders I hope you can tolerate one more question from me. I have created another storage group, but no-one can see it in Outlook. I am running OutlookXP on my Exchange Server (development Exchange server, not production) and no matter where I set permissions, the new public folder that I created in the new storage group does not show up? How can I make Outlook see it? Can I make Outlook see it? TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relaying problems
*boggle* -Original Message- From: Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relaying problems yes I have checked out that article. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF
Did you also clear the DNS cache in the DNS service? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Humberto Perez; Joe Gonzalez Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Stopped the DNS client but DNS still crapped out. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF That's all fine and good, but you need to read up on what the DNS Client service does. The DNS Client Service acts as a client side DNS cache. There is no need for the DNS Client to run on ANY machine on the network. It can help, but on an active server running the DNS service, it causes problems. Disable it and you'll stop having the issue. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF But... the server is its own client. For example in order for Netdiag to pass all the tests, the IP configuration needs its own IP address for the DNS server. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Although this is more NT/Win2k than anything, disable the DNS Client service on the DNS server. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Hi all. I have two Win2K AD DNS servers. Recently they have been acting up: all of a sudden one of them stops using root hints and can't resolve a lot of good domain names (request timed-out). I restart the DNS server service and everything is OK again. Then 10-15 minutes later, it starts giving request timed-out. Both DNS servers experience this at different times. Has anyone here seen this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STM Question
Who'd she pick? - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:08 AM Subject: RE: STM Question Did you know that the final Felicity episode aired last night? It is sad to see it go. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Oooh!! very nice. Thanks Neil! --Felicity Q232323 might clear things up a bit. Neil -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Posted At: 23 May 2002 14:58 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: STM Question Subject: RE: STM Question Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any references to it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native format in the Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, a Word Doc as a word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the priv1.edb, but everything else is stored in the STM. I am basing this on what I read and when I open up the priv1.edb and the priv1.stm in notepad. You have to stop the server to be able to do this. I also am looking at the copies of these files in C:\Program Files\Exchsvr\MDBdata. TIA --Felicity If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all=20 likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments=20 originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a=20 MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with=20 internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI=20 client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. =20 Mark =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb=20 file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been=20 lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so?=20 They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Did you lose any mail? =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Thank you Jeffrey!! =20 It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of=20 beers are on my tap! =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question =20 =20 Morning Admins =20 I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store=20 does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get=20 an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error=20 -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see=20 anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can=20 one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. =20 Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. =20 Thanks =20 Sander =20 =20 =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20
RE: Data Retreival from Exchange Database
If you have the cash, im sure there is a software company somewhere that makes a product to do that. Check out http://www.netiq.com/products/aae/default.asp -Original Message- From: Eric Jenniskens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Data Retreival from Exchange Database Hi, We want to loop through the entire Exchange Database to generate management reports. All items that are overdue or all items with a specific subject should be reported. Is there anyone who can help us... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STM Question
The cute guy. He looka like a man. I tell you eveyting -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STM Question Who'd she pick? - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:08 AM Subject: RE: STM Question Did you know that the final Felicity episode aired last night? It is sad to see it go. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Oooh!! very nice. Thanks Neil! --Felicity Q232323 might clear things up a bit. Neil -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Posted At: 23 May 2002 14:58 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: STM Question Subject: RE: STM Question Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any references to it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native format in the Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, a Word Doc as a word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the priv1.edb, but everything else is stored in the STM. I am basing this on what I read and when I open up the priv1.edb and the priv1.stm in notepad. You have to stop the server to be able to do this. I also am looking at the copies of these files in C:\Program Files\Exchsvr\MDBdata. TIA --Felicity If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all=20 likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments=20 originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a=20 MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with=20 internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI=20 client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. =20 Mark =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb=20 file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been=20 lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so?=20 They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Did you lose any mail? =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Thank you Jeffrey!! =20 It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of=20 beers are on my tap! =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question =20 =20 Morning Admins =20 I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store=20 does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get=20 an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error=20 -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see=20 anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can=20 one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. =20 Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. =20 Thanks =20 Sander =20 =20 =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ:
RE: STM Question
Ben... I wanted Nolle. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STM Question Who'd she pick? - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:08 AM Subject: RE: STM Question Did you know that the final Felicity episode aired last night? It is sad to see it go. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Oooh!! very nice. Thanks Neil! --Felicity Q232323 might clear things up a bit. Neil -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Posted At: 23 May 2002 14:58 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: STM Question Subject: RE: STM Question Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any references to it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native format in the Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, a Word Doc as a word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the priv1.edb, but everything else is stored in the STM. I am basing this on what I read and when I open up the priv1.edb and the priv1.stm in notepad. You have to stop the server to be able to do this. I also am looking at the copies of these files in C:\Program Files\Exchsvr\MDBdata. TIA --Felicity If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all=20 likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments=20 originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a=20 MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with=20 internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI=20 client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. =20 Mark =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb=20 file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been=20 lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so?=20 They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Did you lose any mail? =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Thank you Jeffrey!! =20 It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of=20 beers are on my tap! =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question =20 =20 Morning Admins =20 I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store=20 does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get=20 an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error=20 -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see=20 anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can=20 one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. =20 Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. =20 Thanks =20 Sander =20 =20 =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ:
RE: STM Question
I hope that this isn't a subtle hint telling me to get lost! For the record the show is not based on me or my life. I started to watch the show once and found it too boring. --Felicity Did you know that the final Felicity episode aired last night? It is sad to see it go. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Oooh!! very nice. Thanks Neil! --Felicity Q232323 might clear things up a bit. Neil -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Posted At: 23 May 2002 14:58 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: STM Question Subject: RE: STM Question Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any references to it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native format in the Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, a Word Doc as a word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the priv1.edb, but everything else is stored in the STM. I am basing this on what I read and when I open up the priv1.edb and the priv1.stm in notepad. You have to stop the server to be able to do this. I also am looking at the copies of these files in C:\Program Files\Exchsvr\MDBdata. TIA --Felicity If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all=20 likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments=20 originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a=20 MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with=20 internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI=20 client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. =20 Mark =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb=20 file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been=20 lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so?=20 They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Did you lose any mail? =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Thank you Jeffrey!! =20 It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of=20 beers are on my tap! =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question =20 =20 Morning Admins =20 I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store=20 does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get=20 an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error=20 -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see=20 anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can=20 one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. =20 Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. =20 Thanks =20 Sander =20 =20 =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: STM Question
No ma'am, I just seen your name and thought about the show. You are very welcome here. At least that is what I think:-) -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question I hope that this isn't a subtle hint telling me to get lost! For the record the show is not based on me or my life. I started to watch the show once and found it too boring. --Felicity Did you know that the final Felicity episode aired last night? It is sad to see it go. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Oooh!! very nice. Thanks Neil! --Felicity Q232323 might clear things up a bit. Neil -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Posted At: 23 May 2002 14:58 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: STM Question Subject: RE: STM Question Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any references to it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native format in the Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, a Word Doc as a word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the priv1.edb, but everything else is stored in the STM. I am basing this on what I read and when I open up the priv1.edb and the priv1.stm in notepad. You have to stop the server to be able to do this. I also am looking at the copies of these files in C:\Program Files\Exchsvr\MDBdata. TIA --Felicity If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all=20 likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments=20 originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a=20 MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with=20 internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI=20 client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. =20 Mark =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb=20 file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been=20 lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so?=20 They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Did you lose any mail? =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Thank you Jeffrey!! =20 It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of=20 beers are on my tap! =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question =20 =20 Morning Admins =20 I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store=20 does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get=20 an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error=20 -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see=20 anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can=20 one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. =20 Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. =20 Thanks =20 Sander =20 =20 =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
RE: STM Question
Well now you can have him -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Ben... I wanted Nolle. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STM Question Who'd she pick? - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:08 AM Subject: RE: STM Question Did you know that the final Felicity episode aired last night? It is sad to see it go. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Oooh!! very nice. Thanks Neil! --Felicity Q232323 might clear things up a bit. Neil -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Posted At: 23 May 2002 14:58 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: STM Question Subject: RE: STM Question Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any references to it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native format in the Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, a Word Doc as a word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the priv1.edb, but everything else is stored in the STM. I am basing this on what I read and when I open up the priv1.edb and the priv1.stm in notepad. You have to stop the server to be able to do this. I also am looking at the copies of these files in C:\Program Files\Exchsvr\MDBdata. TIA --Felicity If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all=20 likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments=20 originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a=20 MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with=20 internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI=20 client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. =20 Mark =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb=20 file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been=20 lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so?=20 They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Did you lose any mail? =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Thank you Jeffrey!! =20 It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of=20 beers are on my tap! =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question =20 =20 Morning Admins =20 I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store=20 does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get=20 an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error=20 -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see=20 anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can=20 one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. =20 Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. =20 Thanks =20 Sander =20 =20 =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: STM Question
Sweet! I wonder if he likes Exchange? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Well now you can have him -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Ben... I wanted Nolle. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STM Question Who'd she pick? - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:08 AM Subject: RE: STM Question Did you know that the final Felicity episode aired last night? It is sad to see it go. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Oooh!! very nice. Thanks Neil! --Felicity Q232323 might clear things up a bit. Neil -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Posted At: 23 May 2002 14:58 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: STM Question Subject: RE: STM Question Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any references to it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native format in the Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, a Word Doc as a word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the priv1.edb, but everything else is stored in the STM. I am basing this on what I read and when I open up the priv1.edb and the priv1.stm in notepad. You have to stop the server to be able to do this. I also am looking at the copies of these files in C:\Program Files\Exchsvr\MDBdata. TIA --Felicity If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all=20 likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments=20 originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a=20 MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with=20 internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI=20 client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. =20 Mark =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb=20 file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been=20 lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so?=20 They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Did you lose any mail? =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Thank you Jeffrey!! =20 It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of=20 beers are on my tap! =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question =20 =20 Morning Admins =20 I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store=20 does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get=20 an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error=20 -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see=20 anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can=20 one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. =20 Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. =20 Thanks =20 Sander =20 =20 =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20
RE: ? about public folders
MAPI clients can only access the default PF tree. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 15:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ? about public folders I hope you can tolerate one more question from me. I have created another storage group, but no-one can see it in Outlook. I am running OutlookXP on my Exchange Server (development Exchange server, not production) and no matter where I set permissions, the new public folder that I created in the new storage group does not show up? How can I make Outlook see it? Can I make Outlook see it? TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about public folders
Thanks for your answers Neil and Keith. How do you know this? I did search the documentation, Programming collaborative application by Mindy Martin, and Tom Rizzo's book, but could not find any references to it. Nor in the Exchange Server 2000 Resource Guide, or in Tony Redmonds book (which in my opinion is full of filler). --Felicity MAPI clients can only access the default PF tree. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 15:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ? about public folders I hope you can tolerate one more question from me. I have created another storage group, but no-one can see it in Outlook. I am running OutlookXP on my Exchange Server (development Exchange server, not production) and no matter where I set permissions, the new public folder that I created in the new storage group does not show up? How can I make Outlook see it? Can I make Outlook see it? TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA connection
All, I have NT 4.0 sp5 Proxy 2.0 sp2 and OWA sp4 on one box and NT 4.0 sp5 Ex5.5 sp4 on another box. I have followed the procedures to set up OWA. When I access the page both internally and externally (servername.com/exchange) I log on (using alias) and then put in a username and password an hit return. I then wait and get the error message below. error 'ASP 0113' Script timed out /exchange/USA/LogonFrm.asp The maximum amount of time for a script to execute was exceeded. You can change this limit by specifying a new value for the property Server.ScriptTimeOut or by changing the value in the IIS administration tools. I have looked on technet and only found how to extend the timout of the scripts and even on 300 secs the script still times out. My question is how does OWA communicate with Exchange server (RPC?) and how do I troubleshoot this connection to find out what is causing the timeout. TIA Mark Condron -- CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) only. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and destroy the material whether stored on a computer or otherwise. -- DISCLAIMER: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Wales Council for Voluntary Action, unless otherwise specifically stated. -- Wales Council for Voluntary Action, Baltic House, Mount Stuart Square, Cardiff , UK, CF10 5FH Reception (Head Office): 029 2043 1700 Help Desk: 0870 607 1666 /par Fax: 029 2043 1701 Minicom: 029 2043 1702 Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.wcva.org.uk www.volunteering-wales.net _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about public folders
I've been on a few courses :) Oh, and of course the helpful folks round these parts... -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 15:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ? about public folders Thanks for your answers Neil and Keith. How do you know this? I did search the documentation, Programming collaborative application by Mindy Martin, and Tom Rizzo's book, but could not find any references to it. Nor in the Exchange Server 2000 Resource Guide, or in Tony Redmonds book (which in my opinion is full of filler). --Felicity MAPI clients can only access the default PF tree. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 15:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ? about public folders I hope you can tolerate one more question from me. I have created another storage group, but no-one can see it in Outlook. I am running OutlookXP on my Exchange Server (development Exchange server, not production) and no matter where I set permissions, the new public folder that I created in the new storage group does not show up? How can I make Outlook see it? Can I make Outlook see it? TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STM Question
Notes -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Sweet! I wonder if he likes Exchange? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Well now you can have him -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Ben... I wanted Nolle. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STM Question Who'd she pick? - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:08 AM Subject: RE: STM Question Did you know that the final Felicity episode aired last night? It is sad to see it go. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Oooh!! very nice. Thanks Neil! --Felicity Q232323 might clear things up a bit. Neil -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Posted At: 23 May 2002 14:58 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: STM Question Subject: RE: STM Question Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any references to it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native format in the Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, a Word Doc as a word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the priv1.edb, but everything else is stored in the STM. I am basing this on what I read and when I open up the priv1.edb and the priv1.stm in notepad. You have to stop the server to be able to do this. I also am looking at the copies of these files in C:\Program Files\Exchsvr\MDBdata. TIA --Felicity If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all=20 likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments=20 originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a=20 MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with=20 internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI=20 client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. =20 Mark =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb=20 file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been=20 lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so?=20 They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Did you lose any mail? =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Thank you Jeffrey!! =20 It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of=20 beers are on my tap! =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question =20 =20 Morning Admins =20 I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store=20 does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get=20 an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error=20 -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see=20 anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can=20 one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. =20 Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. =20 Thanks =20 Sander =20 =20 =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
BEST BACKUP
Is anyone happy with a backup system for e2k. We are looking for a new on that works!!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STM Question
Damn him! We might have had something -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Notes -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Sweet! I wonder if he likes Exchange? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Well now you can have him -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Ben... I wanted Nolle. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STM Question Who'd she pick? - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:08 AM Subject: RE: STM Question Did you know that the final Felicity episode aired last night? It is sad to see it go. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Oooh!! very nice. Thanks Neil! --Felicity Q232323 might clear things up a bit. Neil -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Posted At: 23 May 2002 14:58 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: STM Question Subject: RE: STM Question Mark, are you sure about this? and if so can you send me any references to it? I thought that all content is stored in it's native format in the Exchange Store. So Mapi is stored as RTF, HTML as HTML, a Word Doc as a word doc. Some of the properties are stored in the priv1.edb, but everything else is stored in the STM. I am basing this on what I read and when I open up the priv1.edb and the priv1.stm in notepad. You have to stop the server to be able to do this. I also am looking at the copies of these files in C:\Program Files\Exchsvr\MDBdata. TIA --Felicity If all your clients are MAPI based (i.e. Outlook) then in all=20 likelihood you have not lost much at all since any attachments=20 originally delivered to the STM will have been converted to a=20 MAPI-readable copy in the EDB file. Only new messages with=20 internet-formatted content which had not yet been opened by a MAPI=20 client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. =20 Mark =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots of mail that was being held flooded in. I did have the up-to-date edb=20 file, al be it somewhat corrupt..:-)What could have been=20 lost, as some of my other stm files are about a Gig or so?=20 They opened attachments and all seemed to be there. =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Did you lose any mail? =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Thank you Jeffrey!! =20 It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file. Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of=20 beers are on my tap! =20 Tks =20 Sander =20 -Original Message- From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question =20 =20 Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm =20 -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question =20 =20 Morning Admins =20 I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store=20 does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get=20 an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error=20 -1811. I searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see=20 anything on the Technet site that helps me on from here. Can=20 one creatre a blank stm file? I tried it but no joy. =20 Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do if I can't get this resolved soon. =20
Re: OWA connection
Mark, locate this file. At the top of the file just after the % do this server.scripttimeout=300 This will allow your page to take up to 5 minutes to render. It is also possible that the resource you are trying to connect to does not exist. Is the exchange server running? Is your IIS Server hosting OWA running? Can you access the exchange server running plain old outlook? --Felicity All, I have NT 4.0 sp5 Proxy 2.0 sp2 and OWA sp4 on one box and NT 4.0 sp5 Ex5.5 sp4 on another box. I have followed the procedures to set up OWA. When I access the page both internally and externally (servername.com/exchange) I log on (using alias) and then put in a username and password an hit return. I then wait and get the error message below. error 'ASP 0113' Script timed out /exchange/USA/LogonFrm.asp The maximum amount of time for a script to execute was exceeded. You can change this limit by specifying a new value for the property Server.ScriptTimeOut or by changing the value in the IIS administration tools. I have looked on technet and only found how to extend the timout of the scripts and even on 300 secs the script still times out. My question is how does OWA communicate with Exchange server (RPC?) and how do I troubleshoot this connection to find out what is causing the timeout. TIA Mark Condron -- CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) only. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and destroy the material whether stored on a computer or otherwise. -- DISCLAIMER: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Wales Council for Voluntary Action, unless otherwise specifically stated. -- Wales Council for Voluntary Action, Baltic House, Mount Stuart Square, Cardiff , UK, CF10 5FH Reception (Head Office): 029 2043 1700 Help Desk: 0870 607 1666 /par Fax: 029 2043 1701 Minicom: 029 2043 1702 Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.wcva.org.uk www.volunteering-wales.net _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BEST BACKUP
Backup Exec works great for us. What are you currently using? -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BEST BACKUP Is anyone happy with a backup system for e2k. We are looking for a new on that works!!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about public folders
Try looking on MS support website for Q241689, Q258509 etc.. Or just search for 'public folder tree' Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 15:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ? about public folders Thanks for your answers Neil and Keith. How do you know this? I did search the documentation, Programming collaborative application by Mindy Martin, and Tom Rizzo's book, but could not find any references to it. Nor in the Exchange Server 2000 Resource Guide, or in Tony Redmonds book (which in my opinion is full of filler). --Felicity MAPI clients can only access the default PF tree. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 15:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ? about public folders I hope you can tolerate one more question from me. I have created another storage group, but no-one can see it in Outlook. I am running OutlookXP on my Exchange Server (development Exchange server, not production) and no matter where I set permissions, the new public folder that I created in the new storage group does not show up? How can I make Outlook see it? Can I make Outlook see it? TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this e-mail and you are not a named addressee, please inform the Netstore Technical Support Desk on +44 1344 444342 and then delete the e-mail from your system. If you are not a named addressee you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. Although Netstore routinely screens for viruses, addressees should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This mail has been processed with the Netstore Content Filtering Service. Visit our website at www.netstore.net _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about public folders
Thank you Julian, Damn you guys are good! --Felicity Try looking on MS support website for Q241689, Q258509 etc.. Or just search for 'public folder tree' Yours,=20 Julian Stone=20 -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: 23 May 2002 15:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ? about public folders Thanks for your answers Neil and Keith. How do you know this? I did search the documentation, Programming collaborative application by Mindy Martin, and Tom Rizzo's book, but could not find any references to it. Nor in the Exchange Server 2000 Resource Guide, or in Tony Redmonds book (which in my opinion is full of filler). --Felicity MAPI clients can only access the default PF tree. =20 -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 15:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ? about public folders =20 =20 I hope you can tolerate one more question from me. =20 I have created another storage group, but no-one can see it in=20 Outlook. I am running OutlookXP on my Exchange Server (development=20 Exchange server, not production) and no matter where I set=20 permissions, the new public folder that I created in the new storage=20 group does not show up? =20 How can I make Outlook see it? Can I make Outlook see it? =20 TIA =20 --Felicity =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential and/or legally=20 privileged. If you have received this e-mail and you are not a named=20 addressee, please inform the Netstore Technical Support Desk on=20 +44 1344 444342 and then delete the e-mail from your system. If you are=20 not a named addressee you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy,=20 print or rely on this e-mail. Although Netstore routinely screens for=20 viruses, addressees should scan this e-mail and any attachments for=20 viruses. This mail has been processed with the Netstore Content=20 Filtering Service. Visit our website at www.netstore.net=20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about public folders
It's one of those things documented in various whitepapers, articles, etc, that I've read since the info for E2k first started appearing. Neil -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 May 2002 15:56 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: ? about public folders Subject: RE: ? about public folders Thanks for your answers Neil and Keith. How do you know this? I did search the documentation, Programming collaborative application by Mindy Martin, and Tom Rizzo's book, but could not find any references to it. Nor in the Exchange Server 2000 Resource Guide, or in Tony Redmonds book (which in my opinion is full of filler). --Felicity MAPI clients can only access the default PF tree. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 15:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ? about public folders I hope you can tolerate one more question from me. I have created another storage group, but no-one can see it in Outlook. I am running OutlookXP on my Exchange Server (development Exchange server, not production) and no matter where I set permissions, the new public folder that I created in the new storage group does not show up? How can I make Outlook see it? Can I make Outlook see it? TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BEST BACKUP
Back up exec 7.0 flavor. New e2k server is scheduled for backup exec 8.x. Never was to thrilled with buexec exchange handling. Hoping 8.x is better -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BEST BACKUP Backup Exec works great for us. What are you currently using? -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BEST BACKUP Is anyone happy with a backup system for e2k. We are looking for a new on that works!!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ? about public folders
Tony Redmonds's Microsoft Exchange Server for Windows 2000 - page 334 4.7.1 - Public Folder differences between Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000. It's there :-). -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ? about public folders Thanks for your answers Neil and Keith. How do you know this? I did search the documentation, Programming collaborative application by Mindy Martin, and Tom Rizzo's book, but could not find any references to it. Nor in the Exchange Server 2000 Resource Guide, or in Tony Redmonds book (which in my opinion is full of filler). --Felicity MAPI clients can only access the default PF tree. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 15:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ? about public folders I hope you can tolerate one more question from me. I have created another storage group, but no-one can see it in Outlook. I am running OutlookXP on my Exchange Server (development Exchange server, not production) and no matter where I set permissions, the new public folder that I created in the new storage group does not show up? How can I make Outlook see it? Can I make Outlook see it? TIA --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BEST BACKUP
We are currently running 8.6. No problem yet. It runs smoth. Just stay away from Arcserve. -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BEST BACKUP Back up exec 7.0 flavor. New e2k server is scheduled for backup exec 8.x. Never was to thrilled with buexec exchange handling. Hoping 8.x is better -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BEST BACKUP Backup Exec works great for us. What are you currently using? -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BEST BACKUP Is anyone happy with a backup system for e2k. We are looking for a new on that works!!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BEST BACKUP
We had one problem with 8.6 just recently where it would get 5.4 GB through the information store and puke, saying priv.edb was corrupt. It ended up being a problem with using CAT5 cable instead of CAT5E from our backup server to our copper gigabit switch. Otherwise it runs great. Just something to watch for if you're running gigbit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BEST BACKUP We are currently running 8.6. No problem yet. It runs smoth. Just stay away from Arcserve. -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BEST BACKUP Back up exec 7.0 flavor. New e2k server is scheduled for backup exec 8.x. Never was to thrilled with buexec exchange handling. Hoping 8.x is better -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BEST BACKUP Backup Exec works great for us. What are you currently using? -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BEST BACKUP Is anyone happy with a backup system for e2k. We are looking for a new on that works!!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF
Many times. Sometimes it starts working right after clearing the DNS cache (so I don't have to restart the DNS server service), but sometimes it doesn't. But sooner or later it craps out again. Using forwarders (BIND 8) servers seems to eliminate this problem. The issue is that we want to avoid using forwarders, we have other reasons for that. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Did you also clear the DNS cache in the DNS service? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Humberto Perez; Joe Gonzalez Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Stopped the DNS client but DNS still crapped out. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF That's all fine and good, but you need to read up on what the DNS Client service does. The DNS Client Service acts as a client side DNS cache. There is no need for the DNS Client to run on ANY machine on the network. It can help, but on an active server running the DNS service, it causes problems. Disable it and you'll stop having the issue. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF But... the server is its own client. For example in order for Netdiag to pass all the tests, the IP configuration needs its own IP address for the DNS server. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Although this is more NT/Win2k than anything, disable the DNS Client service on the DNS server. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Hi all. I have two Win2K AD DNS servers. Recently they have been acting up: all of a sudden one of them stops using root hints and can't resolve a lot of good domain names (request timed-out). I restart the DNS server service and everything is OK again. Then 10-15 minutes later, it starts giving request timed-out. Both DNS servers experience this at different times. Has anyone here seen this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF
Do any of the other services on the servers stop? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 16:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Many times. Sometimes it starts working right after clearing the DNS cache (so I don't have to restart the DNS server service), but sometimes it doesn't. But sooner or later it craps out again. Using forwarders (BIND 8) servers seems to eliminate this problem. The issue is that we want to avoid using forwarders, we have other reasons for that. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Did you also clear the DNS cache in the DNS service? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Humberto Perez; Joe Gonzalez Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Stopped the DNS client but DNS still crapped out. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF That's all fine and good, but you need to read up on what the DNS Client service does. The DNS Client Service acts as a client side DNS cache. There is no need for the DNS Client to run on ANY machine on the network. It can help, but on an active server running the DNS service, it causes problems. Disable it and you'll stop having the issue. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF But... the server is its own client. For example in order for Netdiag to pass all the tests, the IP configuration needs its own IP address for the DNS server. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Although this is more NT/Win2k than anything, disable the DNS Client service on the DNS server. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Hi all. I have two Win2K AD DNS servers. Recently they have been acting up: all of a sudden one of them stops using root hints and can't resolve a lot of good domain names (request timed-out). I restart the DNS server service and everything is OK again. Then 10-15 minutes later, it starts giving request timed-out. Both DNS servers experience this at different times. Has anyone here seen this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BEST BACKUP
We are using Legato Networker. I am not too crazy about it but it works. A few times it let us down. We also do full backups with NTBACKUP onto another file server and keep that backup copy for 3 days (Mo-Thu-Su goes on E$, Tue-Fri goes on F$, Wed-Sat goes on G$) The only problem with this is that we always have to do full backups (Copy backups did some bad tricks with transaction logs) I really liked the Commvault Galaxy but management decided to go with Legato. -Original Message- From: ExchAdmin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BEST BACKUP We had one problem with 8.6 just recently where it would get 5.4 GB through the information store and puke, saying priv.edb was corrupt. It ended up being a problem with using CAT5 cable instead of CAT5E from our backup server to our copper gigabit switch. Otherwise it runs great. Just something to watch for if you're running gigbit. Aaron -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BEST BACKUP We are currently running 8.6. No problem yet. It runs smoth. Just stay away from Arcserve. -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BEST BACKUP Back up exec 7.0 flavor. New e2k server is scheduled for backup exec 8.x. Never was to thrilled with buexec exchange handling. Hoping 8.x is better -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BEST BACKUP Backup Exec works great for us. What are you currently using? -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BEST BACKUP Is anyone happy with a backup system for e2k. We are looking for a new on that works!!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF
Nope, no services stop at all. Just DNS stops resolving the domain names. -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Do any of the other services on the servers stop? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 16:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Many times. Sometimes it starts working right after clearing the DNS cache (so I don't have to restart the DNS server service), but sometimes it doesn't. But sooner or later it craps out again. Using forwarders (BIND 8) servers seems to eliminate this problem. The issue is that we want to avoid using forwarders, we have other reasons for that. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Did you also clear the DNS cache in the DNS service? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Humberto Perez; Joe Gonzalez Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Stopped the DNS client but DNS still crapped out. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF That's all fine and good, but you need to read up on what the DNS Client service does. The DNS Client Service acts as a client side DNS cache. There is no need for the DNS Client to run on ANY machine on the network. It can help, but on an active server running the DNS service, it causes problems. Disable it and you'll stop having the issue. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF But... the server is its own client. For example in order for Netdiag to pass all the tests, the IP configuration needs its own IP address for the DNS server. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Although this is more NT/Win2k than anything, disable the DNS Client service on the DNS server. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Win2K DNS is PISSING ME OFF Hi all. I have two Win2K AD DNS servers. Recently they have been acting up: all of a sudden one of them stops using root hints and can't resolve a lot of good domain names (request timed-out). I restart the DNS server service and everything is OK again. Then 10-15 minutes later, it starts giving request timed-out. Both DNS servers experience this at different times. Has anyone here seen this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BEST BACKUP
Here, here. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 16:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BEST BACKUP We are currently running 8.6. No problem yet. It runs smoth. Just stay away from Arcserve. -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BEST BACKUP Back up exec 7.0 flavor. New e2k server is scheduled for backup exec 8.x. Never was to thrilled with buexec exchange handling. Hoping 8.x is better -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BEST BACKUP Backup Exec works great for us. What are you currently using? -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BEST BACKUP Is anyone happy with a backup system for e2k. We are looking for a new on that works!!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....
You are right Lori. I did not say new to the list, nor did I say brand new. But I am new compared to you older folks that have been doing this for years and years and ions. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 22 May, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Except you're not new Mike. You've been asking questions of this caliber for over a year. I'm beginning to believe that you cannot read. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used You all are my friends here. Thanks... -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used A popular (read effective) antivirus for mail servers. Google is your friend here. :^) -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Yeah really... I am a new administrator and I haven't a clue. Sorry. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Really? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used What is Scanmail and what is it used for? Thanks.. -Original Message- From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer being used Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes that are not currently being used. Since we are using Trend Micro's Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis. Any help would be appreciated. James Casstevens. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NT to AD Backout Problem
More of an NT/AD than an Exchange issue, but we're only going to AD to get to Exchange 2000, so here goes: As part of planning our migration from our current single NT domain to a single-forest, single-domain active directory, a plan to back out this upgrade in case of unforeseen problems is being developed and tested. The upgrade plan goes something like this: - Create a new NT BDC on new hardware. - Take the production NT PDC offline prior to the AD upgrade. - Promote a new BDC to the PDC. - Upgrade the PDC to AD This is all done using the same netbios domain name in AD as we had in NT, and an internal DNS namespace name that happens to be the same as our WinNT/AD domain name. And, it works great. But, just in case it does not go as well in the real world as it does in our lab, we have the following as a backout plan: - Take the new AD DC(s) offline - Put the old PDC online. - Re-sync the NT domain So far, so good. It all works great - everyone can log back on to the old NT domain and keep going while I figure out what went wrong. Well there is one exception: Windows 2000 workstations and member servers cannot log on - they get a 'Broken trust relationship with the domain controller' message at log on. Win9x and NT boxes have no problem. Any ideas?? Much thanks for any assist. Jon Martin Systems Programmer East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Oakland, CA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 server won't go away
Did you do what was outlined in this KB: http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q272314 Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 server won't go away ADSIEdit - wack it from Active Directory at that level. But be careful screwing around with ADSIEdit. It's like playing with the registry, maybe even more dangerous. -Original Message- From: McCullar, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 server won't go away I have removed a 5.5 server from my Ex2K environment. I did not do it the right way and it still shows up in my System Manager. I have search my TechNet to see how to clean it out to no avail. Can someone help? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longerb eing used....
Im not an ion, but I am a charged particle. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used You are right Lori. I did not say new to the list, nor did I say brand new. But I am new compared to you older folks that have been doing this for years and years and ions. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 22 May, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Except you're not new Mike. You've been asking questions of this caliber for over a year. I'm beginning to believe that you cannot read. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used You all are my friends here. Thanks... -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used A popular (read effective) antivirus for mail servers. Google is your friend here. :^) -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Yeah really... I am a new administrator and I haven't a clue. Sorry. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Really? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used What is Scanmail and what is it used for? Thanks.. -Original Message- From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer being used Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes that are not currently being used. Since we are using Trend Micro's Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis. Any help would be appreciated. James Casstevens. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....
Are you 'positive' about that? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Im not an ion, but I am a charged particle. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used You are right Lori. I did not say new to the list, nor did I say brand new. But I am new compared to you older folks that have been doing this for years and years and ions. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 22 May, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Except you're not new Mike. You've been asking questions of this caliber for over a year. I'm beginning to believe that you cannot read. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used You all are my friends here. Thanks... -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used A popular (read effective) antivirus for mail servers. Google is your friend here. :^) -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Yeah really... I am a new administrator and I haven't a clue. Sorry. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Really? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used What is Scanmail and what is it used for? Thanks.. -Original Message- From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer being used Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes that are not currently being used. Since we are using Trend Micro's Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis. Any help would be appreciated. James Casstevens. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....
Negative -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Are you 'positive' about that? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Im not an ion, but I am a charged particle. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used You are right Lori. I did not say new to the list, nor did I say brand new. But I am new compared to you older folks that have been doing this for years and years and ions. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 22 May, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Except you're not new Mike. You've been asking questions of this caliber for over a year. I'm beginning to believe that you cannot read. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used You all are my friends here. Thanks... -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used A popular (read effective) antivirus for mail servers. Google is your friend here. :^) -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Yeah really... I am a new administrator and I haven't a clue. Sorry. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Really? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used What is Scanmail and what is it used for? Thanks.. -Original Message- From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer being used Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes that are not currently being used. Since we are using Trend Micro's Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis. Any help would be appreciated. James Casstevens. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....
Must be, cuz he said not an-ion. -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Are you 'positive' about that? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Im not an ion, but I am a charged particle. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used You are right Lori. I did not say new to the list, nor did I say brand new. But I am new compared to you older folks that have been doing this for years and years and ions. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 22 May, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Except you're not new Mike. You've been asking questions of this caliber for over a year. I'm beginning to believe that you cannot read. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used You all are my friends here. Thanks... -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used A popular (read effective) antivirus for mail servers. Google is your friend here. :^) -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Yeah really... I am a new administrator and I haven't a clue. Sorry. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Really? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used What is Scanmail and what is it used for? Thanks.. -Original Message- From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer being used Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes that are not currently being used. Since we are using Trend Micro's Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis. Any help would be appreciated. James Casstevens. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
Re: Routing group bandwidth requirements
Well, it's more important that the bandwidth is highly available than it is for the bandwidth to be, say 10 Mb. But I'd say that your low limit for connectivity would be somewhere around 128 Kbps - but would prefer to see 256 Kbps or better with an RG. Missy - Original Message - From: Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:55 AM Subject: Routing group bandwidth requirements What are the typical bandwidth requirements within a routing group. Are there any documented guidelines available? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with accessing a PF
Anyone have any other suggestions for this problem? Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with accessing a PF Nope. No replication of PFs and no affinity. Also no age limits set. Thanks for the reply. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with accessing a PF 1) Do you replicate the PF content to other 55 servers? 2) Do you have affinity with other 55 Sites? -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 May 2002 01:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with accessing a PF NT 4 SP6a SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 I have what started as one, but is now up to four users who will lose access to some of our public folders at seemingly random intervals. This has happened to the original user about three times in the last month to six weeks. The user has reviewer permission to the folder through a distribution list, and will still be listed in the DL, but cannot see the contents of the folder. Also, he does not get the error message about not having permission, just, Unable to display the folder. He can, however, read the subfolders he has permission to that are underneath this folder. (and to which he has the exact same rights!) The only temporary fix we had found was to remove the user from the DL, wait for replication to complete, then re-add his account to the DL, but lately that hasn't been working either. Also, giving him reviewer rights by name to the folder does not work. To throw one last curve in, the users can access these folders through OWA. So far, this has happened to three users on the same folder, and a fourth user on a different folder. Any solutions, suggestions or WAGs would be most appreciated. Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN issue...
IPsec cannot be used through a router that NAT's the packets. The NAT'ing hoses things on the packet. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN issue... Hi All, Please check this out... we have a pix firewall in our office with a frame-relay connection... at the branch office we are connected Via an ADSL Lucent Cell pipe router... All the configurations on the router were done by the service provider and he informed us to use the default gateway of 192.168.0.10 for our LAN there... now the problem is that we cannot establish a PPTP connection between the firewall and the Win 2K clients thru the ADSL and the LAN ... but when we use dial up coonections and use the services of the same ISP... we can establish the VPN connection... At the firewall end I can see that the client gets connected for some time.. and then is disconnected... on the client side I see the dialg that the machine is trying to connect to the remote host.. then says.. verifying username and password and then after some time I get the error that says... The L2TP connection attempt failed becasue the security layer encountered a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer Actually this LAN is being set up by a Novice.. but very Enthusiast .. Sys Admin .. from our branch office.. and so far he had been telling me that the remote client only attempts to connect to the firewall... he gets the verifying username and password screen and then it tels him that the username and the password is bad... .. till I had to force him to allow me to use PCANywhere and dial into one of the clients... and check myself what was happening from that end.. when I noticed this... I feel that this has to do with ... the Win 2000 domain security... I feel that he has set up the domain and all the machines there on the network to be forced to use IPSec and since the IPSec policy is being applied to the LAN cards... but not to the dial up modem interfaces.. I am getting the error mentioned But if you guys can help me with this.,... please do.. I get the error 789 on the Win 2K server.. where in I set up the machine for PPTP with secure connection as an option.. since the firewall has been set up at the moment to allow PPTP connections I have myself treid it out on a ADSL connection .. but from a different Service provider and it appears to work fine... CAN it be a NAT issue... but logically again.. I feel it is not.. since I have configured for a WIndows RRAS server... on a LAN with an ADSL connection and have succesfully established a VPN conneciton from all the clients ... .. so I feel that the NATtting is not an issue here... unless this ISP is blocking some ports.. Can some one please throw more light on this Regards _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements
Isn't intrarouting group communication much less intense than intrasite? -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Routing group bandwidth requirements Well, it's more important that the bandwidth is highly available than it is for the bandwidth to be, say 10 Mb. But I'd say that your low limit for connectivity would be somewhere around 128 Kbps - but would prefer to see 256 Kbps or better with an RG. Missy - Original Message - From: Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:55 AM Subject: Routing group bandwidth requirements What are the typical bandwidth requirements within a routing group. Are there any documented guidelines available? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN issue...
But I am using a PPTP.. and I have had a test environ where in a Win 2K machine was a \RRAS server and all the clients were able to connect from behind the RRAS server.. which was connected to the ADSL -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN issue... IPsec cannot be used through a router that NAT's the packets. The NAT'ing hoses things on the packet. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN issue... Hi All, Please check this out... we have a pix firewall in our office with a frame-relay connection... at the branch office we are connected Via an ADSL Lucent Cell pipe router... All the configurations on the router were done by the service provider and he informed us to use the default gateway of 192.168.0.10 for our LAN there... now the problem is that we cannot establish a PPTP connection between the firewall and the Win 2K clients thru the ADSL and the LAN ... but when we use dial up coonections and use the services of the same ISP... we can establish the VPN connection... At the firewall end I can see that the client gets connected for some time.. and then is disconnected... on the client side I see the dialg that the machine is trying to connect to the remote host.. then says.. verifying username and password and then after some time I get the error that says... The L2TP connection attempt failed becasue the security layer encountered a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer Actually this LAN is being set up by a Novice.. but very Enthusiast .. Sys Admin .. from our branch office.. and so far he had been telling me that the remote client only attempts to connect to the firewall... he gets the verifying username and password screen and then it tels him that the username and the password is bad... .. till I had to force him to allow me to use PCANywhere and dial into one of the clients... and check myself what was happening from that end.. when I noticed this... I feel that this has to do with ... the Win 2000 domain security... I feel that he has set up the domain and all the machines there on the network to be forced to use IPSec and since the IPSec policy is being applied to the LAN cards... but not to the dial up modem interfaces.. I am getting the error mentioned But if you guys can help me with this.,... please do.. I get the error 789 on the Win 2K server.. where in I set up the machine for PPTP with secure connection as an option.. since the firewall has been set up at the moment to allow PPTP connections I have myself treid it out on a ADSL connection .. but from a different Service provider and it appears to work fine... CAN it be a NAT issue... but logically again.. I feel it is not.. since I have configured for a WIndows RRAS server... on a LAN with an ADSL connection and have succesfully established a VPN conneciton from all the clients ... .. so I feel that the NATtting is not an issue here... unless this ISP is blocking some ports.. Can some one please throw more light on this Regards _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routing group bandwidth requirements
Yeppers. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:28 PM Subject: RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements Isn't intrarouting group communication much less intense than intrasite? -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Routing group bandwidth requirements Well, it's more important that the bandwidth is highly available than it is for the bandwidth to be, say 10 Mb. But I'd say that your low limit for connectivity would be somewhere around 128 Kbps - but would prefer to see 256 Kbps or better with an RG. Missy - Original Message - From: Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:55 AM Subject: Routing group bandwidth requirements What are the typical bandwidth requirements within a routing group. Are there any documented guidelines available? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VPN issue...
PPTP != IPSec -- but you say the L2TP connection failed - L2TP can (and probably is) use IPSec. - Original Message - From: Muqeem Syed [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:35 PM Subject: RE: VPN issue... But I am using a PPTP.. and I have had a test environ where in a Win 2K machine was a \RRAS server and all the clients were able to connect from behind the RRAS server.. which was connected to the ADSL -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN issue... IPsec cannot be used through a router that NAT's the packets. The NAT'ing hoses things on the packet. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN issue... Hi All, Please check this out... we have a pix firewall in our office with a frame-relay connection... at the branch office we are connected Via an ADSL Lucent Cell pipe router... All the configurations on the router were done by the service provider and he informed us to use the default gateway of 192.168.0.10 for our LAN there... now the problem is that we cannot establish a PPTP connection between the firewall and the Win 2K clients thru the ADSL and the LAN ... but when we use dial up coonections and use the services of the same ISP... we can establish the VPN connection... At the firewall end I can see that the client gets connected for some time.. and then is disconnected... on the client side I see the dialg that the machine is trying to connect to the remote host.. then says.. verifying username and password and then after some time I get the error that says... The L2TP connection attempt failed becasue the security layer encountered a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer Actually this LAN is being set up by a Novice.. but very Enthusiast .. Sys Admin .. from our branch office.. and so far he had been telling me that the remote client only attempts to connect to the firewall... he gets the verifying username and password screen and then it tels him that the username and the password is bad... .. till I had to force him to allow me to use PCANywhere and dial into one of the clients... and check myself what was happening from that end.. when I noticed this... I feel that this has to do with ... the Win 2000 domain security... I feel that he has set up the domain and all the machines there on the network to be forced to use IPSec and since the IPSec policy is being applied to the LAN cards... but not to the dial up modem interfaces.. I am getting the error mentioned But if you guys can help me with this.,... please do.. I get the error 789 on the Win 2K server.. where in I set up the machine for PPTP with secure connection as an option.. since the firewall has been set up at the moment to allow PPTP connections I have myself treid it out on a ADSL connection .. but from a different Service provider and it appears to work fine... CAN it be a NAT issue... but logically again.. I feel it is not.. since I have configured for a WIndows RRAS server... on a LAN with an ADSL connection and have succesfully established a VPN conneciton from all the clients ... .. so I feel that the NATtting is not an issue here... unless this ISP is blocking some ports.. Can some one please throw more light on this Regards _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: VPN issue...
But PPTP can. Who said anything about IPSec? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN issue... IPsec cannot be used through a router that NAT's the packets. The NAT'ing hoses things on the packet. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN issue... Hi All, Please check this out... we have a pix firewall in our office with a frame-relay connection... at the branch office we are connected Via an ADSL Lucent Cell pipe router... All the configurations on the router were done by the service provider and he informed us to use the default gateway of 192.168.0.10 for our LAN there... now the problem is that we cannot establish a PPTP connection between the firewall and the Win 2K clients thru the ADSL and the LAN ... but when we use dial up coonections and use the services of the same ISP... we can establish the VPN connection... At the firewall end I can see that the client gets connected for some time.. and then is disconnected... on the client side I see the dialg that the machine is trying to connect to the remote host.. then says.. verifying username and password and then after some time I get the error that says... The L2TP connection attempt failed becasue the security layer encountered a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer Actually this LAN is being set up by a Novice.. but very Enthusiast .. Sys Admin .. from our branch office.. and so far he had been telling me that the remote client only attempts to connect to the firewall... he gets the verifying username and password screen and then it tels him that the username and the password is bad... .. till I had to force him to allow me to use PCANywhere and dial into one of the clients... and check myself what was happening from that end.. when I noticed this... I feel that this has to do with ... the Win 2000 domain security... I feel that he has set up the domain and all the machines there on the network to be forced to use IPSec and since the IPSec policy is being applied to the LAN cards... but not to the dial up modem interfaces.. I am getting the error mentioned But if you guys can help me with this.,... please do.. I get the error 789 on the Win 2K server.. where in I set up the machine for PPTP with secure connection as an option.. since the firewall has been set up at the moment to allow PPTP connections I have myself treid it out on a ADSL connection .. but from a different Service provider and it appears to work fine... CAN it be a NAT issue... but logically again.. I feel it is not.. since I have configured for a WIndows RRAS server... on a LAN with an ADSL connection and have succesfully established a VPN conneciton from all the clients ... .. so I feel that the NATtting is not an issue here... unless this ISP is blocking some ports.. Can some one please throw more light on this Regards _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements
Based on what? Gut feeling? Or any actual stats? The only reason I ask is that there's a distinct lack of any best practice or stats yet. My understanding is that, since SMTP is asynchronous, it can still work in low bandwidth environments without the timeouts associated with RPCs. So in theory, messages would just queue if there's not enough bandwidth. So the thinking then becomes that we only know how low we can go if we know what sort of traffic we're gonna get... Neil -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 May 2002 17:11 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Routing group bandwidth requirements Subject: Re: Routing group bandwidth requirements Well, it's more important that the bandwidth is highly available than it is for the bandwidth to be, say 10 Mb. But I'd say that your low limit for connectivity would be somewhere around 128 Kbps - but would prefer to see 256 Kbps or better with an RG. Missy - Original Message - From: Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:55 AM Subject: Routing group bandwidth requirements What are the typical bandwidth requirements within a routing group. Are there any documented guidelines available? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN issue...
Yeah Aaron but the problem you see... for some reason... it is not working on the ADSL... and that too only from Sharjah... but I have myself tested it out in CYprus with a local ISP and ADSL here and had a win 2K server with 3 clients behind it.. and the Win 2K server as a RRAS .. and all the clients could get on to the VPN.. do u think it is an issye with the Lucent router.. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN issue... But PPTP can. Who said anything about IPSec? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN issue... IPsec cannot be used through a router that NAT's the packets. The NAT'ing hoses things on the packet. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN issue... Hi All, Please check this out... we have a pix firewall in our office with a frame-relay connection... at the branch office we are connected Via an ADSL Lucent Cell pipe router... All the configurations on the router were done by the service provider and he informed us to use the default gateway of 192.168.0.10 for our LAN there... now the problem is that we cannot establish a PPTP connection between the firewall and the Win 2K clients thru the ADSL and the LAN ... but when we use dial up coonections and use the services of the same ISP... we can establish the VPN connection... At the firewall end I can see that the client gets connected for some time.. and then is disconnected... on the client side I see the dialg that the machine is trying to connect to the remote host.. then says.. verifying username and password and then after some time I get the error that says... The L2TP connection attempt failed becasue the security layer encountered a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer Actually this LAN is being set up by a Novice.. but very Enthusiast .. Sys Admin .. from our branch office.. and so far he had been telling me that the remote client only attempts to connect to the firewall... he gets the verifying username and password screen and then it tels him that the username and the password is bad... .. till I had to force him to allow me to use PCANywhere and dial into one of the clients... and check myself what was happening from that end.. when I noticed this... I feel that this has to do with ... the Win 2000 domain security... I feel that he has set up the domain and all the machines there on the network to be forced to use IPSec and since the IPSec policy is being applied to the LAN cards... but not to the dial up modem interfaces.. I am getting the error mentioned But if you guys can help me with this.,... please do.. I get the error 789 on the Win 2K server.. where in I set up the machine for PPTP with secure connection as an option.. since the firewall has been set up at the moment to allow PPTP connections I have myself treid it out on a ADSL connection .. but from a different Service provider and it appears to work fine... CAN it be a NAT issue... but logically again.. I feel it is not.. since I have configured for a WIndows RRAS server... on a LAN with an ADSL connection and have succesfully established a VPN conneciton from all the clients ... .. so I feel that the NATtting is not an issue here... unless this ISP is blocking some ports.. Can some one please throw more light on this Regards _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements
Im Missy's case, Im betting on real life experience. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements Based on what? Gut feeling? Or any actual stats? The only reason I ask is that there's a distinct lack of any best practice or stats yet. My understanding is that, since SMTP is asynchronous, it can still work in low bandwidth environments without the timeouts associated with RPCs. So in theory, messages would just queue if there's not enough bandwidth. So the thinking then becomes that we only know how low we can go if we know what sort of traffic we're gonna get... Neil -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 May 2002 17:11 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Routing group bandwidth requirements Subject: Re: Routing group bandwidth requirements Well, it's more important that the bandwidth is highly available than it is for the bandwidth to be, say 10 Mb. But I'd say that your low limit for connectivity would be somewhere around 128 Kbps - but would prefer to see 256 Kbps or better with an RG. Missy - Original Message - From: Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:55 AM Subject: Routing group bandwidth requirements What are the typical bandwidth requirements within a routing group. Are there any documented guidelines available? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN issue...
Possibly a problem with the ADSL router... some routers don't pass PPTP packets properly. Upgrade it to the latest firmware. Also, your ADSL ISP may be blocking PPTP protocol... wouldn't be the first time I've seem ADSL providers blocking VPN ports. Aaron -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN issue... Yeah Aaron but the problem you see... for some reason... it is not working on the ADSL... and that too only from Sharjah... but I have myself tested it out in CYprus with a local ISP and ADSL here and had a win 2K server with 3 clients behind it.. and the Win 2K server as a RRAS .. and all the clients could get on to the VPN.. do u think it is an issye with the Lucent router.. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN issue... But PPTP can. Who said anything about IPSec? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN issue... IPsec cannot be used through a router that NAT's the packets. The NAT'ing hoses things on the packet. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN issue... Hi All, Please check this out... we have a pix firewall in our office with a frame-relay connection... at the branch office we are connected Via an ADSL Lucent Cell pipe router... All the configurations on the router were done by the service provider and he informed us to use the default gateway of 192.168.0.10 for our LAN there... now the problem is that we cannot establish a PPTP connection between the firewall and the Win 2K clients thru the ADSL and the LAN ... but when we use dial up coonections and use the services of the same ISP... we can establish the VPN connection... At the firewall end I can see that the client gets connected for some time.. and then is disconnected... on the client side I see the dialg that the machine is trying to connect to the remote host.. then says.. verifying username and password and then after some time I get the error that says... The L2TP connection attempt failed becasue the security layer encountered a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer Actually this LAN is being set up by a Novice.. but very Enthusiast .. Sys Admin .. from our branch office.. and so far he had been telling me that the remote client only attempts to connect to the firewall... he gets the verifying username and password screen and then it tels him that the username and the password is bad... .. till I had to force him to allow me to use PCANywhere and dial into one of the clients... and check myself what was happening from that end.. when I noticed this... I feel that this has to do with ... the Win 2000 domain security... I feel that he has set up the domain and all the machines there on the network to be forced to use IPSec and since the IPSec policy is being applied to the LAN cards... but not to the dial up modem interfaces.. I am getting the error mentioned But if you guys can help me with this.,... please do.. I get the error 789 on the Win 2K server.. where in I set up the machine for PPTP with secure connection as an option.. since the firewall has been set up at the moment to allow PPTP connections I have myself treid it out on a ADSL connection .. but from a different Service provider and it appears to work fine... CAN it be a NAT issue... but logically again.. I feel it is not.. since I have configured for a WIndows RRAS server... on a LAN with an ADSL connection and have succesfully established a VPN conneciton from all the clients ... .. so I feel that the NATtting is not an issue here... unless this ISP is blocking some ports.. Can some one please throw more light on this Regards _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
Re: Routing group bandwidth requirements
While I appreciate your confidence, this is actually me just guessing. But since MS doesn't care to provide any hard numbers, I took a WAG at what I would do, were it my client's environment I was designing. M - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:47 PM Subject: RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements Im Missy's case, Im betting on real life experience. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements Based on what? Gut feeling? Or any actual stats? The only reason I ask is that there's a distinct lack of any best practice or stats yet. My understanding is that, since SMTP is asynchronous, it can still work in low bandwidth environments without the timeouts associated with RPCs. So in theory, messages would just queue if there's not enough bandwidth. So the thinking then becomes that we only know how low we can go if we know what sort of traffic we're gonna get... Neil -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 May 2002 17:11 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Routing group bandwidth requirements Subject: Re: Routing group bandwidth requirements Well, it's more important that the bandwidth is highly available than it is for the bandwidth to be, say 10 Mb. But I'd say that your low limit for connectivity would be somewhere around 128 Kbps - but would prefer to see 256 Kbps or better with an RG. Missy - Original Message - From: Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:55 AM Subject: Routing group bandwidth requirements What are the typical bandwidth requirements within a routing group. Are there any documented guidelines available? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements
Just buttering you up so you'll buy me beer. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Routing group bandwidth requirements While I appreciate your confidence, this is actually me just guessing. But since MS doesn't care to provide any hard numbers, I took a WAG at what I would do, were it my client's environment I was designing. M - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:47 PM Subject: RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements Im Missy's case, Im betting on real life experience. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Routing group bandwidth requirements Based on what? Gut feeling? Or any actual stats? The only reason I ask is that there's a distinct lack of any best practice or stats yet. My understanding is that, since SMTP is asynchronous, it can still work in low bandwidth environments without the timeouts associated with RPCs. So in theory, messages would just queue if there's not enough bandwidth. So the thinking then becomes that we only know how low we can go if we know what sort of traffic we're gonna get... Neil -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 23 May 2002 17:11 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Routing group bandwidth requirements Subject: Re: Routing group bandwidth requirements Well, it's more important that the bandwidth is highly available than it is for the bandwidth to be, say 10 Mb. But I'd say that your low limit for connectivity would be somewhere around 128 Kbps - but would prefer to see 256 Kbps or better with an RG. Missy - Original Message - From: Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 5:55 AM Subject: Routing group bandwidth requirements What are the typical bandwidth requirements within a routing group. Are there any documented guidelines available? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this
RE: VPN issue...
Thats what I was wondering too... but it is the same ISP who is providing the office there with a Dial up conneciton as well.. and it seems to work fine -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN issue... Possibly a problem with the ADSL router... some routers don't pass PPTP packets properly. Upgrade it to the latest firmware. Also, your ADSL ISP may be blocking PPTP protocol... wouldn't be the first time I've seem ADSL providers blocking VPN ports. Aaron -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN issue... Yeah Aaron but the problem you see... for some reason... it is not working on the ADSL... and that too only from Sharjah... but I have myself tested it out in CYprus with a local ISP and ADSL here and had a win 2K server with 3 clients behind it.. and the Win 2K server as a RRAS .. and all the clients could get on to the VPN.. do u think it is an issye with the Lucent router.. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN issue... But PPTP can. Who said anything about IPSec? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN issue... IPsec cannot be used through a router that NAT's the packets. The NAT'ing hoses things on the packet. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN issue... Hi All, Please check this out... we have a pix firewall in our office with a frame-relay connection... at the branch office we are connected Via an ADSL Lucent Cell pipe router... All the configurations on the router were done by the service provider and he informed us to use the default gateway of 192.168.0.10 for our LAN there... now the problem is that we cannot establish a PPTP connection between the firewall and the Win 2K clients thru the ADSL and the LAN ... but when we use dial up coonections and use the services of the same ISP... we can establish the VPN connection... At the firewall end I can see that the client gets connected for some time.. and then is disconnected... on the client side I see the dialg that the machine is trying to connect to the remote host.. then says.. verifying username and password and then after some time I get the error that says... The L2TP connection attempt failed becasue the security layer encountered a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer Actually this LAN is being set up by a Novice.. but very Enthusiast .. Sys Admin .. from our branch office.. and so far he had been telling me that the remote client only attempts to connect to the firewall... he gets the verifying username and password screen and then it tels him that the username and the password is bad... .. till I had to force him to allow me to use PCANywhere and dial into one of the clients... and check myself what was happening from that end.. when I noticed this... I feel that this has to do with ... the Win 2000 domain security... I feel that he has set up the domain and all the machines there on the network to be forced to use IPSec and since the IPSec policy is being applied to the LAN cards... but not to the dial up modem interfaces.. I am getting the error mentioned But if you guys can help me with this.,... please do.. I get the error 789 on the Win 2K server.. where in I set up the machine for PPTP with secure connection as an option.. since the firewall has been set up at the moment to allow PPTP connections I have myself treid it out on a ADSL connection .. but from a different Service provider and it appears to work fine... CAN it be a NAT issue... but logically again.. I feel it is not.. since I have configured for a WIndows RRAS server... on a LAN with an ADSL connection and have succesfully established a VPN conneciton from all the clients ... .. so I feel that the NATtting is not an issue here... unless this ISP is blocking some ports.. Can some one please throw more light on this Regards _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Problem with accessing a PF
Anyone have any other suggestions for this problem? Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with accessing a PF Nope. No replication of PFs and no affinity. Also no age limits set. Thanks for the reply. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with accessing a PF 1) Do you replicate the PF content to other 55 servers? 2) Do you have affinity with other 55 Sites? -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 May 2002 01:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with accessing a PF NT 4 SP6a SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 I have what started as one, but is now up to four users who will lose access to some of our public folders at seemingly random intervals. This has happened to the original user about three times in the last month to six weeks. The user has reviewer permission to the folder through a distribution list, and will still be listed in the DL, but cannot see the contents of the folder. Also, he does not get the error message about not having permission, just, Unable to display the folder. He can, however, read the subfolders he has permission to that are underneath this folder. (and to which he has the exact same rights!) The only temporary fix we had found was to remove the user from the DL, wait for replication to complete, then re-add his account to the DL, but lately that hasn't been working either. Also, giving him reviewer rights by name to the folder does not work. To throw one last curve in, the users can access these folders through OWA. So far, this has happened to three users on the same folder, and a fourth user on a different folder. Any solutions, suggestions or WAGs would be most appreciated. Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is this LDAP error?
I looked in the KB and I don't see much on this error. I just installed Ex 2000 a few days ago and I am trying to clean up all of the errors: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeSRS Event Category: LDAP Interface Event ID: 1309 Date: 05/23/2002 Time: 1:11:53 PM User: N/A Computer: TRUCK Description: Register LDAP SSL protocol failed with error 10048. The LDAP SSL server is not available. Make sure port number 44843 is not used by another application. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.4.4
This is killing me. I have a user on exch5.5 SP4 whos smtp address is domain.com. When I am trying to send to him I get the following NDR. Notice how it put the 1 at the end of the domain name. I am trying to send to him from a exh2k SP2 server in the same site. I have checked every where and cannot find where Exchange is finding this address? Any ideas? Thanks. Reporting-MTA: dns; smtp.domain.com Received-From-MTA: dns; exchange.domain.com (unverified [x.x.x.x) Arrival-Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 13:16:21 -0400 Final-Recipient: rfc822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.4.4 (Permanent failure - routing/network: unable to route) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Problem with accessing a PF
They might be temporarily loosing the network connection which would cause them no longer to be correctly authenticated. OWA probably has a solid connection to that server. But re-logging to the NT domain should fix that. Are the users that experience this problem in the same network segment? Is this particular PF on a different server then the rest of PF's they can access? Just throwing in a bone :=) Jerzy From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/23 Thu PM 01:12:11 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with accessing a PF Anyone have any other suggestions for this problem? Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with accessing a PF Nope. No replication of PFs and no affinity. Also no age limits set. Thanks for the reply. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with accessing a PF 1) Do you replicate the PF content to other 55 servers? 2) Do you have affinity with other 55 Sites? -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 May 2002 01:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with accessing a PF NT 4 SP6a SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 I have what started as one, but is now up to four users who will lose access to some of our public folders at seemingly random intervals. This has happened to the original user about three times in the last month to six weeks. The user has reviewer permission to the folder through a distribution list, and will still be listed in the DL, but cannot see the contents of the folder. Also, he does not get the error message about not having permission, just, Unable to display the folder. He can, however, read the subfolders he has permission to that are underneath this folder. (and to which he has the exact same rights!) The only temporary fix we had found was to remove the user from the DL, wait for replication to complete, then re-add his account to the DL, but lately that hasn't been working either. Also, giving him reviewer rights by name to the folder does not work. To throw one last curve in, the users can access these folders through OWA. So far, this has happened to three users on the same folder, and a fourth user on a different folder. Any solutions, suggestions or WAGs would be most appreciated. Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA login problem
Hi Gurus I have a problem with my OWA login. The environment is Exchange 5.5 (2 servers, 1 site) and we have OWA running on 1 server. Recently we added another exchange server to be purely the SMTP and OWA server. This server runs on windows 2000, IIS 5 and it is a member server. I have chosen Anonymous and Basic authentication. \ When I try this from office, it works fine. When we try from outside, I am able to the initial logon box, then I get the Exchange logon page. After entering the mailbox name it comes out with another login box. Here when we type the password it again pops with the same box. After 3 attempts you get a blank page. In my office, the same screens appear and it authenticates to the inbox. I am desperate to get a solution for this. Thanks Kumar _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA login problem
Are you specifying domain name when logging it? as in domain\login From: Kumar Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/23 Thu PM 01:51:12 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OWA login problem Hi Gurus I have a problem with my OWA login. The environment is Exchange 5.5 (2 servers, 1 site) and we have OWA running on 1 server. Recently we added another exchange server to be purely the SMTP and OWA server. This server runs on windows 2000, IIS 5 and it is a member server. I have chosen Anonymous and Basic authentication. \ When I try this from office, it works fine. When we try from outside, I am able to the initial logon box, then I get the Exchange logon page. After entering the mailbox name it comes out with another login box. Here when we type the password it again pops with the same box. After 3 attempts you get a blank page. In my office, the same screens appear and it authenticates to the inbox. I am desperate to get a solution for this. Thanks Kumar _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bad Mail
Gurus of the list. Exchange 2000 SP2 Windows 2000 Server SP2. I have an Exchange 2000 network and a few users have recently complained of slow external mail delivery, three hour delivery being common. I looked through the queues and I was confused by what I saw. I read the articles in Tony Redmonds book and searched the normal FAQs and MS support, although helpful information it doesn't help me understand what I am seeing. Looking at the the queue I see the normal stuff that I would expect: Domain.com local delivery Messages with And a few others Then I see 54 entries of wrongname.domain.com to a load of different domains, with anywhere between 0 and 250 messages. When we first set up the Exchange 2000 server we set wrongname.domain.com as an alternative address for every users account then took it off the recipient policy but those aliases still exist. I also went to the Bad Mail folder and found 100,814 entires in there. Any ideas what is wrong here. Also does Exchange have a way to delete the Bad Mail after a certain point? Thanks Nathan Boyd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Data Retreival from Exchange Database
What do you mean by overdue? Are you talking about Tasks or flagged messages, or both? Either way, you probably will have to hire a consultant to write some custom code for you. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Eric Jenniskens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Data Retreival from Exchange Database Hi, We want to loop through the entire Exchange Database to generate management reports. All items that are overdue or all items with a specific subject should be reported. Is there anyone who can help us... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
