RE: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER
Woohoo! I'll blog the proceedings for everyone's amusement. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER Prepare to be sued! Edgar J. Crowley Jr. Technical Consultant Windows & Messaging Platforms Practice hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER For anyone who cares, the following people are out of their offices: Al Suckoo [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I will be away from the office until Sept 9th. (this one is confidential... It said so in the disclaimer.) Griffiths, M.D., James [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I will be out of the office until 9/4/02. Fioon [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I am currently Out of the Office (again... Privileged information) Le, Anh (NIH/CIT) [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I'm out of office from 8/26 - 8/28 Don Bertino [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I'll be on vacation, returning August 28th, 2002. Gary Duckman [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I am away from the office until Tuesday 11th September 2002. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER Depends (in part) on your needs I guess. With an entry point of $22k (as of June), it's a bit expensive for your typical SMB. I think their consolidation marketing figures are just a bit unrealistic, but what do I know. Have they come put with a DMS compliant version yet? -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 8/26/2002 9:43 PM Subject: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER DO any of you feel Exchange wil be going out the door .A lot of companies are switching to Oracle mail server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Annoying Embedded Document Error
Hello I am having the following problem. I have a custom form in which is embedded a couple of Word documents. Sometimes, it happens that some users (not necessarily at the same time) that when they try to open a document, they receive the following error message: "Can't create file: Myfile.doc. Right Click the folder you want to create the file In and then click properties and check your permissions for the folder". Once this happens, the user that has the problem cannot open all documents of the same type until they remove their Windows user profile and recreate a new one. As such, they do not have the problem if they logon to another computer. It is important to note that the same form contains other Word documents, but the error occurs on a particular document type, that may vary from one user to the other. For instance, if user X has a problem with documents of type A in all Outlook forms, user B might have the same problem but with documents of type B. I have faced this problem before on more than one user/Station and the only solution I found was to delete the Windows user profile. Recreating a new Outlook profile for the user does not solve the problem. It is becoming very annoying to solve this problem in this manner. Does anyone know why this is occurring or where does outlook open these files locally? Any help is much appreciated. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: REPLY for ED Crowley
I nominate Tom Meunier. He's not Ed. Edgar J. Crowley Jr. Technical Consultant Windows & Messaging Platforms Practice hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 6:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: REPLY for ED Crowley Maybe this guy needs a Tech Buddy... any volunteers? (Evil Booming LaughterT) (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: REPLY for ED Crowley Sorry, I'm not Ed. But it looks like your DNS is screwed up. Shouldn't have anything to do with mailguard, since it's an outbound SMTP connection. Unless your PIX is between your E2k server and a smarthost. Make sure your SMTP virtual server is pointed to a good DNS server that is set up to allow forwarding unresolvable requests. > -Original Message- > From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Monday, August 26, 2002 07:08 AM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: REPLY for ED Crowley > Subject: REPLY for ED Crowley > > > Hi Ed, > > i cant send out from my exchange 2000 box so im replying to > your questions through SWYNK. > > yes i have the mailguard feature turned off. this is the > message that i get when i try to send out: > > This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. > > THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. > > YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. > > Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. > >xxx@x > > then it gets delayed for a while then i get a report saying > it could not be sent. > > thanks for the help with this.. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Missing Court Notifications
Turn on message tracking and use that to troubleshoot. Edgar J. Crowley Jr. Technical Consultant Windows & Messaging Platforms Practice hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Missing Court Notifications I'm wondering if anyone else has seen this behavior. We have an attorney and his secretary who are both set up to receive notifications from one of the courts here in Washington State. These notifications are sent to BCC addresses with nothing in the To field, so the messages received by the attorney and secretary appear for all the world to be identical, with only the id number assigned by the IMC showing otherwise. The secretary is set up as an alternate recipient for the attorney, so normally she receives two, apparently identical, notifications at a time. Sporadically, however, she will only get one, and in the one instance I've been able to investigate fully, it was the one sent to the attorney. My question is this, is it possible that Exchange is seeing these messages as duplicates and therefore only delivering it once, in the same way that if one is in two DLs both of which are sent a message, the message will only be delivered once? The messages did arrive at the IMC seperately, but they both arrived in the same second. -Peter __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER
Prepare to be sued! Edgar J. Crowley Jr. Technical Consultant Windows & Messaging Platforms Practice hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER For anyone who cares, the following people are out of their offices: Al Suckoo [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I will be away from the office until Sept 9th. (this one is confidential... It said so in the disclaimer.) Griffiths, M.D., James [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I will be out of the office until 9/4/02. Fioon [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I am currently Out of the Office (again... Privileged information) Le, Anh (NIH/CIT) [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I'm out of office from 8/26 - 8/28 Don Bertino [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I'll be on vacation, returning August 28th, 2002. Gary Duckman [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I am away from the office until Tuesday 11th September 2002. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER Depends (in part) on your needs I guess. With an entry point of $22k (as of June), it's a bit expensive for your typical SMB. I think their consolidation marketing figures are just a bit unrealistic, but what do I know. Have they come put with a DMS compliant version yet? -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 8/26/2002 9:43 PM Subject: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER DO any of you feel Exchange wil be going out the door .A lot of companies are switching to Oracle mail server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER
For anyone who cares, the following people are out of their offices: Al Suckoo [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I will be away from the office until Sept 9th. (this one is confidential... It said so in the disclaimer.) Griffiths, M.D., James [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I will be out of the office until 9/4/02. Fioon [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I am currently Out of the Office (again... Privileged information) Le, Anh (NIH/CIT) [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I'm out of office from 8/26 - 8/28 Don Bertino [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I'll be on vacation, returning August 28th, 2002. Gary Duckman [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I am away from the office until Tuesday 11th September 2002. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER Depends (in part) on your needs I guess. With an entry point of $22k (as of June), it's a bit expensive for your typical SMB. I think their consolidation marketing figures are just a bit unrealistic, but what do I know. Have they come put with a DMS compliant version yet? -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 8/26/2002 9:43 PM Subject: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER DO any of you feel Exchange wil be going out the door .A lot of companies are switching to Oracle mail server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER
Depends (in part) on your needs I guess. With an entry point of $22k (as of June), it's a bit expensive for your typical SMB. I think their consolidation marketing figures are just a bit unrealistic, but what do I know. Have they come put with a DMS compliant version yet? -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 8/26/2002 9:43 PM Subject: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER DO any of you feel Exchange wil be going out the door .A lot of companies are switching to Oracle mail server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER
Depends on whose marketing information you read. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER DO any of you feel Exchange wil be going out the door .A lot of companies are switching to Oracle mail server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER
Yes. Exchange5.5 will be going out the door probably within a couple of years joining Exchange4.0 and Exchange5.0. A lot? I don't think so, Timmy. A few? Sure. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 7:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER DO any of you feel Exchange wil be going out the door .A lot of companies are switching to Oracle mail server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EXCHANGE VS ORACLE MAIL SERVER
DO any of you feel Exchange wil be going out the door .A lot of companies are switching to Oracle mail server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 in SBS 4.5 w/SP6 - Shared Calendar Problem
What happens when you do a rebuild/restore on a test box? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 in SBS 4.5 w/SP6 - Shared Calendar Problem We have a problem where several users who were sharing their Outlook Calendars for a long period of time, were not able to use the Calendar any more. "Error: The itme could not be saved to this folder. The folder has been deleted or moved, or you do not have permission. Do you want to save a copy of it in the default folder for the item?" This occurred shortly after our main SBS4.5 SCSI HDD would no longer boot up NT4.0/SP6. The mirror drive was used and the main drive taken off line for warranty replacement. We suspect the mirror drive was not a 100% mirror of the exchange and that some data is missing or corrupted on the mirror drive. Any ideas on what this could be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IM not connecting
Get rid of the special record you made for the _vpr protocol in DNS. See if that fixes anything. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrea Coppini Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IM not connecting Hi gurus, I'm (still) setting up a new Exchange 2k server to migrate our existing 5.5 server. Everything's working fine, BUT IM. I have created (and recreated around 20 times by now) an IM virtual server, installed IM client, checked the DNS entries, etc. as per microsoft step-by-step documentation... I have installed IM client on the Exchange server itself (to avoid routing/port/firewall issues). But I keep getting the 'Sign In To Exchange' dialog box telling me that "The person logged on to this computer does not have permission to use the specified e-mail address. Please type your e-mail address and password" asking me for my E-Mail, Username, Password and Domain. I'm logged in as myself, and I'm a Schema/Domain/Enterprise admin. I'm trying to connect using my own IM account. Any ideas? Thanks Regards Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
Martin will keep you honest for all the wrong reasons. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Harmon, Michelle M. Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Oops. I was, once again, dead wrong. Thanks for keeping me honest. ;) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recommended Hardware; 500 users
I've got a 32-processor box with 778 exabytes of hard drive storage and 8 4xAGP cards. Now I can finally run Exchange 2000 *and* have enough power left over to play Freecell without hanging STORE.EXE. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommended Hardware; 500 users this is beginning to sound like "Mine is bigger then your's" ;-) Ok so Ive got here a CPQ Proliant 2500 with dual 200's and 256MB, 5-4GB HD's just sitting around...it's available.. it should do 500 .. ;-) bill -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommended Hardware; 500 users I just ordered an 800 gig emc fiber thing.. It has more CPU power then my current SQL server that it will be replacing.. 4 x 2 gig Intel procs.. Simply crazy.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommended Hardware; 500 users Yes please. Ship it to my house. You know where I live. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommended Hardware; 500 users You want to have a 1 terabyte disk array? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yanek Korff Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recommended Hardware; 500 users At some point we're going to be migrating to Windows/Exchange 2000 and need to ensure we're getting the right hardware. Assuming we'll be getting Dell hardware, might someone offer a suggestion? Specifically, we want to: 1. Provide for Exchange conferencing services to satellite offices Proc/Mem/Disk requirements? 2. Provide Exchange mail service for 500 users Proc/Mem/Disk requirements? The IMC will likely go on its own system with a 10/100 NIC, while the other two will be on a GigE network. We're leaning towards dual Xeon proc for both these systems with 2GB memory. Likely 2x18GB drives for the conferencing server and the same for the mail server... but an external drive array to accommodate storage needs. We'd like to provide 1GB mailbox quotas and 30 day deleted item retention. Comments? Advice? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Missing Court Notifications
Maybe someone left off the secretary on some of the messages. Try and see if the behavior presists when you use the TO: line, so you're not left guessing with the BCC line. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Missing Court Notifications I'm wondering if anyone else has seen this behavior. We have an attorney and his secretary who are both set up to receive notifications from one of the courts here in Washington State. These notifications are sent to BCC addresses with nothing in the To field, so the messages received by the attorney and secretary appear for all the world to be identical, with only the id number assigned by the IMC showing otherwise. The secretary is set up as an alternate recipient for the attorney, so normally she receives two, apparently identical, notifications at a time. Sporadically, however, she will only get one, and in the one instance I've been able to investigate fully, it was the one sent to the attorney. My question is this, is it possible that Exchange is seeing these messages as duplicates and therefore only delivering it once, in the same way that if one is in two DLs both of which are sent a message, the message will only be delivered once? The messages did arrive at the IMC seperately, but they both arrived in the same second. -Peter __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending POP3 Mail out via Exchange 2000
If a desktop with Outlook Express can POP/SMTP just fine, it's the Jornada setup. Make sure ALL the settings are in there appropriately. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Crumbaker, Ron Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending POP3 Mail out via Exchange 2000 I am having problems getting a HP Jornada to send email out to external email address. I have it setup to receive email, but when I try to send mail out I get an error stating: "Your message could not be delivered to the following invalid recipients" What am I missing on getting either Exchange setup or the Jornada? Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP PC Systems Administrator MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: REPLY for ED Crowley
Maybe this guy needs a Tech Buddy... any volunteers? (Evil Booming LaughterT) (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: REPLY for ED Crowley Sorry, I'm not Ed. But it looks like your DNS is screwed up. Shouldn't have anything to do with mailguard, since it's an outbound SMTP connection. Unless your PIX is between your E2k server and a smarthost. Make sure your SMTP virtual server is pointed to a good DNS server that is set up to allow forwarding unresolvable requests. > -Original Message- > From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Monday, August 26, 2002 07:08 AM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: REPLY for ED Crowley > Subject: REPLY for ED Crowley > > > Hi Ed, > > i cant send out from my exchange 2000 box so im replying to > your questions through SWYNK. > > yes i have the mailguard feature turned off. this is the > message that i get when i try to send out: > > This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. > > THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. > > YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. > > Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. > >xxx@x > > then it gets delayed for a while then i get a report saying > it could not be sent. > > thanks for the help with this.. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: w3svc causes error 36
Try Win2K SP3... (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Varghese, Wilson Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: w3svc causes error 36 I was asked by MS PSS to : 1. Uninstall IIS 2. Reinstall IIS 3. Reinstall Win2k SP2 4. reinstall Exchange 2000 5. reinstall Exchange 2000 sp3 This was to resolve this damn bug with mail just sitting in the outbox for 30 minutes at a time. Well now I'm getting this error on that server. Event ID 36. The server failed to load application '/LM/W3SVC'. The error was 'The specified metadata was not found. And people with mailboxes on that server can't access it with OWA, they get the error 500 - internal server error. I've been reading through the support site and so far nothing matches this error and the fixes I have tried doesn't seem to solve it. Anyone have any ideas? I'm still waiting for the PSS person to call back but thought I would ask the brains in here first :) Thanks in advance. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP for Multi server Environment.
Sure. Why not? If one uses a smart host, the other one should be able to just fine. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Raji Arulambalam Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP for Multi server Environment. Yes One is master, the other member. - Raji Arulambalam Systems Administrator Bay of Plenty REGIONAL Council P O Box 364 Whakatane. NEW ZEALAND http://envbop.govt.nz If it was easy, the hardware people would take care of it. -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 26 August 2002 5:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP for Multi server Environment. Are they in the same routing group? -Original Message- From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 26 August 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP for Multi server Environment. Hi The question is do I need to configure both SMTP servers to use the smart host or only one would do. Its the same smart host for both. - Raji Arulambalam Systems Administrator Bay of Plenty REGIONAL Council P O Box 364 Whakatane. NEW ZEALAND http://envbop.govt.nz -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 26 August 2002 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP for Multi server Environment. You only need to set up a smart host if you have to send all your mail to a particular server to submit to the Internet. If you don't have such a messaging environment, IE, all your servers are set up with MX records, then you don't need to configure a smart host. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Raji Arulambalam Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP for Multi server Environment. Hi I have just installed a second E2K server in the same Admin Group as the first one. Do I need to configure both the Default SMTP Virtual Servers to deliver messages to a smart host.? Or do I remove the existing smart host settings and create a new SMTP connector? Can you point me to any KB articles on configuring SMTP in a multi-server environment within the same Organisation. Cheers - Raji Arulambalam Systems Administrator Bay of Plenty REGIONAL Council P O Box 364 Whakatane. NEW ZEALAND http://envbop.govt.nz Kirk taunting Khan: Khan, I'm laughing at the superior intellect. ** This e-mail has been checked for viruses and no viruses were detected. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged. If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2) 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained in this message and any attachment. Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made to this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or for the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and any attachment. Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attachment." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message has been swept for content and viruses. No viruses were detected. Contact the Helpdesk on extension 9CIS (9247) for assistance, if required. ** This e-mail has been checked for viruses and no viruses were detected. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/re
RE: Recommended Hardware; 500 users
this is beginning to sound like "Mine is bigger then your's" ;-) Ok so Ive got here a CPQ Proliant 2500 with dual 200's and 256MB, 5-4GB HD's just sitting around...it's available.. it should do 500 .. ;-) bill -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommended Hardware; 500 users I just ordered an 800 gig emc fiber thing.. It has more CPU power then my current SQL server that it will be replacing.. 4 x 2 gig Intel procs.. Simply crazy.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommended Hardware; 500 users Yes please. Ship it to my house. You know where I live. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommended Hardware; 500 users You want to have a 1 terabyte disk array? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yanek Korff Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recommended Hardware; 500 users At some point we're going to be migrating to Windows/Exchange 2000 and need to ensure we're getting the right hardware. Assuming we'll be getting Dell hardware, might someone offer a suggestion? Specifically, we want to: 1. Provide for Exchange conferencing services to satellite offices Proc/Mem/Disk requirements? 2. Provide Exchange mail service for 500 users Proc/Mem/Disk requirements? The IMC will likely go on its own system with a 10/100 NIC, while the other two will be on a GigE network. We're leaning towards dual Xeon proc for both these systems with 2GB memory. Likely 2x18GB drives for the conferencing server and the same for the mail server... but an external drive array to accommodate storage needs. We'd like to provide 1GB mailbox quotas and 30 day deleted item retention. Comments? Advice? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recommended Hardware; 500 users
I just ordered an 800 gig emc fiber thing.. It has more CPU power then my current SQL server that it will be replacing.. 4 x 2 gig Intel procs.. Simply crazy.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommended Hardware; 500 users Yes please. Ship it to my house. You know where I live. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommended Hardware; 500 users You want to have a 1 terabyte disk array? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yanek Korff Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recommended Hardware; 500 users At some point we're going to be migrating to Windows/Exchange 2000 and need to ensure we're getting the right hardware. Assuming we'll be getting Dell hardware, might someone offer a suggestion? Specifically, we want to: 1. Provide for Exchange conferencing services to satellite offices Proc/Mem/Disk requirements? 2. Provide Exchange mail service for 500 users Proc/Mem/Disk requirements? The IMC will likely go on its own system with a 10/100 NIC, while the other two will be on a GigE network. We're leaning towards dual Xeon proc for both these systems with 2GB memory. Likely 2x18GB drives for the conferencing server and the same for the mail server... but an external drive array to accommodate storage needs. We'd like to provide 1GB mailbox quotas and 30 day deleted item retention. Comments? Advice? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recommended Hardware; 500 users
Dell has an Exchange server sizing tool on their website. > -Original Message- > From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:03 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Recommended Hardware; 500 users > > > > At some point we're going to be migrating to Windows/Exchange > 2000 and need to ensure we're getting the right hardware. > Assuming we'll be getting Dell hardware, might someone offer > a suggestion? Specifically, we want to: > > 1. Provide for Exchange conferencing services to satellite > offices Proc/Mem/Disk requirements? 2. Provide Exchange mail > service for 500 users Proc/Mem/Disk requirements? > > The IMC will likely go on its own system with a 10/100 NIC, > while the other two will be on a GigE network. We're leaning > towards dual Xeon proc for both these systems with 2GB > memory. Likely 2x18GB drives for the conferencing server and > the same for the mail server... but an external drive array > to accommodate storage needs. We'd like to provide 1GB > mailbox quotas and 30 day deleted item retention. > > Comments? Advice? > > -Yanek. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recommended Hardware; 500 users
Yes please. Ship it to my house. You know where I live. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommended Hardware; 500 users You want to have a 1 terabyte disk array? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yanek Korff Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recommended Hardware; 500 users At some point we're going to be migrating to Windows/Exchange 2000 and need to ensure we're getting the right hardware. Assuming we'll be getting Dell hardware, might someone offer a suggestion? Specifically, we want to: 1. Provide for Exchange conferencing services to satellite offices Proc/Mem/Disk requirements? 2. Provide Exchange mail service for 500 users Proc/Mem/Disk requirements? The IMC will likely go on its own system with a 10/100 NIC, while the other two will be on a GigE network. We're leaning towards dual Xeon proc for both these systems with 2GB memory. Likely 2x18GB drives for the conferencing server and the same for the mail server... but an external drive array to accommodate storage needs. We'd like to provide 1GB mailbox quotas and 30 day deleted item retention. Comments? Advice? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recommended Hardware; 500 users
You want to have a 1 terabyte disk array? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yanek Korff Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recommended Hardware; 500 users At some point we're going to be migrating to Windows/Exchange 2000 and need to ensure we're getting the right hardware. Assuming we'll be getting Dell hardware, might someone offer a suggestion? Specifically, we want to: 1. Provide for Exchange conferencing services to satellite offices Proc/Mem/Disk requirements? 2. Provide Exchange mail service for 500 users Proc/Mem/Disk requirements? The IMC will likely go on its own system with a 10/100 NIC, while the other two will be on a GigE network. We're leaning towards dual Xeon proc for both these systems with 2GB memory. Likely 2x18GB drives for the conferencing server and the same for the mail server... but an external drive array to accommodate storage needs. We'd like to provide 1GB mailbox quotas and 30 day deleted item retention. Comments? Advice? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Mail
If you rebuild them one at a time and make sure to have a global catalog up at all times I don't see why everything won't keep running. Maybe I'm mistaken, but when I rebuilt my Domain controllers that how I did it without any ill effects. chuck -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Mail Nope. Your Exchange Services wont start either. -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 7:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Mail If the PDC and the BDC has to be rebuilt will users still have access to their email, even on a different Sid after servers are rebuilt?.The Exchange servers are seperate severs and we have 2 Mail severs, and they are not on the Bdc. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recommended Hardware; 500 users
At some point we're going to be migrating to Windows/Exchange 2000 and need to ensure we're getting the right hardware. Assuming we'll be getting Dell hardware, might someone offer a suggestion? Specifically, we want to: 1. Provide for Exchange conferencing services to satellite offices Proc/Mem/Disk requirements? 2. Provide Exchange mail service for 500 users Proc/Mem/Disk requirements? The IMC will likely go on its own system with a 10/100 NIC, while the other two will be on a GigE network. We're leaning towards dual Xeon proc for both these systems with 2GB memory. Likely 2x18GB drives for the conferencing server and the same for the mail server... but an external drive array to accommodate storage needs. We'd like to provide 1GB mailbox quotas and 30 day deleted item retention. Comments? Advice? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IM not connecting
Hi gurus, I'm (still) setting up a new Exchange 2k server to migrate our existing 5.5 server. Everything's working fine, BUT IM. I have created (and recreated around 20 times by now) an IM virtual server, installed IM client, checked the DNS entries, etc. as per microsoft step-by-step documentation... I have installed IM client on the Exchange server itself (to avoid routing/port/firewall issues). But I keep getting the 'Sign In To Exchange' dialog box telling me that "The person logged on to this computer does not have permission to use the specified e-mail address. Please type your e-mail address and password" asking me for my E-Mail, Username, Password and Domain. I'm logged in as myself, and I'm a Schema/Domain/Enterprise admin. I'm trying to connect using my own IM account. Any ideas? Thanks Regards Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mirror Exchange
In that case, you might look at Marathon Technologies. > -Original Message- > From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:35 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Mirror Exchange > > > For redundancy > > > Brian > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:46 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Mirror Exchange > > > What are you plannning to use it for specifically? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:13 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Mirror Exchange > > > > > > Has anyone ever used doubletake to mirror an exchange server? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mirror Exchange
For redundancy Brian -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mirror Exchange What are you plannning to use it for specifically? > -Original Message- > From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:13 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Mirror Exchange > > > Has anyone ever used doubletake to mirror an exchange server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Auto replies
Have them set their default "Reply-To" for the new address and have the individual users inform their external contacts. -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Auto replies I'm sure this issue has surfaced on the discussion list but I couldnt' find an appropriate solution. We have a bunch of staff whose email accounts are being migrated to another company's mail server. We are obliged to maintain their email accounts for a month following which we shall delete their mailboxes. They presently have access to both our internet Exchange mail server as well as their new company external mail server through POP3. During this period, how can they inform the public about the change in their email address ? I have disabled Automatic replies to the Internet. Outlook 2000 on the client side. Exchange 5.5 SP4 on the server side. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Auto replies
Re-enable it... -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Auto replies I'm sure this issue has surfaced on the discussion list but I couldnt' find an appropriate solution. We have a bunch of staff whose email accounts are being migrated to another company's mail server. We are obliged to maintain their email accounts for a month following which we shall delete their mailboxes. They presently have access to both our internet Exchange mail server as well as their new company external mail server through POP3. During this period, how can they inform the public about the change in their email address ? I have disabled Automatic replies to the Internet. Outlook 2000 on the client side. Exchange 5.5 SP4 on the server side. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auto replies
I'm sure this issue has surfaced on the discussion list but I couldnt' find an appropriate solution. We have a bunch of staff whose email accounts are being migrated to another company's mail server. We are obliged to maintain their email accounts for a month following which we shall delete their mailboxes. They presently have access to both our internet Exchange mail server as well as their new company external mail server through POP3. During this period, how can they inform the public about the change in their email address ? I have disabled Automatic replies to the Internet. Outlook 2000 on the client side. Exchange 5.5 SP4 on the server side. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where are my NDRs?
All, We upgraded from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2k and ever since the upgrade we have been unable to get NDRs sent to the DL for mail admins. (I realize it is no longer a DL.) We didn't upgrade the 5.5 box, rather we upgraded to a front end/back end clustered environment. one of our admins thinks it has to do with the FE/BE configuration. Are there any special considerations I need to take into account to simply get NDRs? Thanks in advance for any input Paul LEGAL NOTICE: Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mirror Exchange
What are you plannning to use it for specifically? > -Original Message- > From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:13 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Mirror Exchange > > > Has anyone ever used doubletake to mirror an exchange server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Missing Court Notifications
I'm wondering if anyone else has seen this behavior. We have an attorney and his secretary who are both set up to receive notifications from one of the courts here in Washington State. These notifications are sent to BCC addresses with nothing in the To field, so the messages received by the attorney and secretary appear for all the world to be identical, with only the id number assigned by the IMC showing otherwise. The secretary is set up as an alternate recipient for the attorney, so normally she receives two, apparently identical, notifications at a time. Sporadically, however, she will only get one, and in the one instance I've been able to investigate fully, it was the one sent to the attorney. My question is this, is it possible that Exchange is seeing these messages as duplicates and therefore only delivering it once, in the same way that if one is in two DLs both of which are sent a message, the message will only be delivered once? The messages did arrive at the IMC seperately, but they both arrived in the same second. -Peter __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Pickup directory
Is the name of the message file that you're dropping in the pickup directory by any chance the same as a filename you've used previously? I've run into problems when trying to use the same filename over again, possibly due to an anti-looping feature. -Peter -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 6:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory I know you have verified the permissions already, but thats what it sounds like. Maybe after a few more coffees something else will pop in my head. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Okay, now we may be getting somewhere... The archive directory was already there, so I deleted it to test to see if restarting the IMS would recreate it. It did not. Nothing logged in the event logs besides the IMS stop and start events. Aaron -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Ok, final shot, then maybe others have some ideas. :) Was the archive directory created underneath the pickup dir when you restarted the IMS? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Yah, did that too. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 6:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Ok, dumb question: Did you check the permissions on the message, i.e. the file itself? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Yup, SA has Change access to the pickup directory. I have gone thru all the permissions and verified the registry settings according to Q319890. Aaron -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Does the Exch SA account have the necessary permissions to access that file? What troubleshooting have you already done? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC Pickup directory Hi all, I am placing a RFC822 compliant message in my Exch 5.5 SP4 (NT4.0 SP6a) IMC pickup directory, but the message never gets delivered and the file just stays in that directory. I've reviewed a number of Q articles to try and troubleshoot why the pickup directory doesn't work but nothing has helped. Anyone have any ideas what might be wrong? Thanks. Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error,
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
Yea. SSL is always your best bet. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 you have to switch from nt authentication on the login page to basic authenticaiton. BUT then all password/usernames are sent in clear text so I would invest in an SSL key/certificate. - Original Message - From: "Alex Alborzfard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:07 PM Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > DUDE!!! That did it, thanks! > On a related note, is it possible to get do away w. "domain\" part > when logging into OWA? > > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 1:40 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Dude. Did you install the Exchange SP on the OWA box yet? SP3 or SP4. > You need to. > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:24 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Thanks, this is a great article, however there's no Transaction Server > folder under IIS in WIN2K! > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:54 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q248718 > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:40 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > I disabled the SMTP on the WIN2K box and installed the new OWA on it. > The WWW is running and I can http to it, but OWA doesn't work. It > comes up with > this error message: > > Error Type: > Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) > Object required: 'Application(...)' > /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 > > Any ideas? > > > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:25 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > E55 does not use the IIS SMTP engine unless you have specifically done > something for some reason to make it do so. As for the new OWA box, > uninstall the SMTP engine. Of the big 3 component (WWW, SMTP, FTP) All > you need is the WWW service. > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:20 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Ok. Stopping the IIS admin services requries stopping the Microsoft > SMTP server. Doesn't this disrupt the SMTP services on the EX box? I > know EX5.5 unlike EX2K doesn't (shouldn't) rely on this service, but > there have been times that I had to stop & start this service for > Exchange send & receive normally. And if I install OWA on a WIN2K > server, the SMTP service on IIS 5 > would provide the service? > I thought the SMTP under IIS 4 & 5 were very different. > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:06 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > No and No. > I would stop the IIS services on the orignal OWA box, but that's it. > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:03 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, > right? > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. > Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 > I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. > I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to > IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K > server serve this > up? > > Thanks > > Alex Alborzfard, MCSE > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
Yep. You need to set the "Default Domain" in IIS. In IIS, go to Directory Security, Authentication Methods, Select Default Domain, Edit. Insert your NT domain name. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 DUDE!!! That did it, thanks! On a related note, is it possible to get do away w. "domain\" part when logging into OWA? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Dude. Did you install the Exchange SP on the OWA box yet? SP3 or SP4. You need to. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Thanks, this is a great article, however there's no Transaction Server folder under IIS in WIN2K! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q248718 -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 I disabled the SMTP on the WIN2K box and installed the new OWA on it. The WWW is running and I can http to it, but OWA doesn't work. It comes up with this error message: Error Type: Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) Object required: 'Application(...)' /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 Any ideas? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 E55 does not use the IIS SMTP engine unless you have specifically done something for some reason to make it do so. As for the new OWA box, uninstall the SMTP engine. Of the big 3 component (WWW, SMTP, FTP) All you need is the WWW service. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Ok. Stopping the IIS admin services requries stopping the Microsoft SMTP server. Doesn't this disrupt the SMTP services on the EX box? I know EX5.5 unlike EX2K doesn't (shouldn't) rely on this service, but there have been times that I had to stop & start this service for Exchange send & receive normally. And if I install OWA on a WIN2K server, the SMTP service on IIS 5 would provide the service? I thought the SMTP under IIS 4 & 5 were very different. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 No and No. I would stop the IIS services on the orignal OWA box, but that's it. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, right? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/
Re: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
you have to switch from nt authentication on the login page to basic authenticaiton. BUT then all password/usernames are sent in clear text so I would invest in an SSL key/certificate. - Original Message - From: "Alex Alborzfard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:07 PM Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > DUDE!!! That did it, thanks! > On a related note, is it possible to get do away w. "domain\" part when > logging into OWA? > > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 1:40 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Dude. Did you install the Exchange SP on the OWA box yet? SP3 or SP4. > You need to. > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:24 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Thanks, this is a great article, however there's no Transaction Server > folder under IIS in WIN2K! > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:54 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q248718 > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:40 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > I disabled the SMTP on the WIN2K box and installed the new OWA on it. The > WWW is running and I can http to it, but OWA doesn't work. It comes up with > this error message: > > Error Type: > Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) > Object required: 'Application(...)' > /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 > > Any ideas? > > > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:25 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > E55 does not use the IIS SMTP engine unless you have specifically done > something for some reason to make it do so. > As for the new OWA box, uninstall the SMTP engine. Of the big 3 component > (WWW, SMTP, FTP) All you need is the WWW service. > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:20 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Ok. Stopping the IIS admin services requries stopping the Microsoft SMTP > server. Doesn't this disrupt the SMTP services on the EX box? I know EX5.5 > unlike EX2K doesn't (shouldn't) rely on this service, but there have been > times that I had to stop & start this service for Exchange send & receive > normally. And if I install OWA on a WIN2K server, the SMTP service on IIS 5 > would provide the service? > I thought the SMTP under IIS 4 & 5 were very different. > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:06 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > No and No. > I would stop the IIS services on the orignal OWA box, but that's it. > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:03 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, right? > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. > Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 > I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. > I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX > need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this > up? > > Thanks > > Alex Alborzfard, MCSE > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe:
Re: Importing staff birthdays into everyones OUTLOOK Calendar
Sue Mosher's Slipstick site has a "Transmit Holidays Form". Version 7: Automatically generates a list of holidays from a calendar folder. Ideally, you'll point it to a public folder that already contains a company holiday calendar. (Doesn't have to be holidays can be special events, etc...) http://www.slipstick.com/dev/olforms/holiday.htm > Hi, > Outlook 2000 on the client side > Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Server side > We have a staff directory on one of our Public folders that is populated > with Staff birthdays and anniversaries that only the HR Manager has OWNER > rights to while the rest of the staff has REVIEWER permissions. How can I > get my staff to import these birthdays and anniversaries into their > calendars ? > I tried a drag and drop and it won't work. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mirror Exchange
Did it work? Any problems? Would you recommend it? Brian -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mirror Exchange Yes. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Dugas Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mirror Exchange Has anyone ever used doubletake to mirror an exchange server? Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
DUDE!!! That did it, thanks! On a related note, is it possible to get do away w. "domain\" part when logging into OWA? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Dude. Did you install the Exchange SP on the OWA box yet? SP3 or SP4. You need to. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Thanks, this is a great article, however there's no Transaction Server folder under IIS in WIN2K! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q248718 -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 I disabled the SMTP on the WIN2K box and installed the new OWA on it. The WWW is running and I can http to it, but OWA doesn't work. It comes up with this error message: Error Type: Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) Object required: 'Application(...)' /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 Any ideas? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 E55 does not use the IIS SMTP engine unless you have specifically done something for some reason to make it do so. As for the new OWA box, uninstall the SMTP engine. Of the big 3 component (WWW, SMTP, FTP) All you need is the WWW service. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Ok. Stopping the IIS admin services requries stopping the Microsoft SMTP server. Doesn't this disrupt the SMTP services on the EX box? I know EX5.5 unlike EX2K doesn't (shouldn't) rely on this service, but there have been times that I had to stop & start this service for Exchange send & receive normally. And if I install OWA on a WIN2K server, the SMTP service on IIS 5 would provide the service? I thought the SMTP under IIS 4 & 5 were very different. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 No and No. I would stop the IIS services on the orignal OWA box, but that's it. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, right? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange Lis
w3svc causes error 36
I was asked by MS PSS to : 1. Uninstall IIS 2. Reinstall IIS 3. Reinstall Win2k SP2 4. reinstall Exchange 2000 5. reinstall Exchange 2000 sp3 This was to resolve this damn bug with mail just sitting in the outbox for 30 minutes at a time. Well now I'm getting this error on that server. Event ID 36. The server failed to load application '/LM/W3SVC'. The error was 'The specified metadata was not found. And people with mailboxes on that server can't access it with OWA, they get the error 500 - internal server error. I've been reading through the support site and so far nothing matches this error and the fixes I have tried doesn't seem to solve it. Anyone have any ideas? I'm still waiting for the PSS person to call back but thought I would ask the brains in here first :) Thanks in advance. Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc.
Slime molds taste better, but they don't satiate your stomach like a C-ration can. At 10:27 AM 8/26/2002 -0500, EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) wrote: >Like C-rations, but C-rations aren't that bad with a lot of salt and pepper. > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:18 AM > >To: Exchange Discussions > >Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > > > > >Aren't fruitcakes stale to begin with? =;-) They say you could bury a > >fruitcake for 1000 years and it would still be the same as > >when you first > >put it there. Kind of scary, isn't it? > > > >Geoff... > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:06 AM > >To: Exchange Discussions > >Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > > > > >Remind me to send you a fruit cake (stale one!) for Christmas! > > > >-Original Message- > >From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:45 PM > >To: Exchange Discussions > >Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > > > > >Always happy to chip in. > > > >>-Original Message- > >>From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:35 PM > >>To: Exchange Discussions > >>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > >> > >> > >>Thanks Tony you were great help!!! > >> > >>-Original Message- > >>From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:30 PM > >>To: Exchange Discussions > >>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > >> > >> > >>Booo. You could have let him squirm a bit. > >> > >> > >>>-Original Message- > >>>From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:28 PM > >>>To: Exchange Discussions > >>>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > >>> > >>> > >>>Acronyms... Buy the ... Manual, Read the ... Manual. etc... > >>> > >>>-Original Message- > >>>From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 1:24 PM > >>>To: Exchange Discussions > >>>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > >>> > >>> > >>>What's all these BTFM RTFM STFW?! > >>>Is this like Exchange secret language or something?!! > >>> > >>>--Alex > >>> > >>>-Original Message- > >>>From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) > >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:22 PM > >>>To: Exchange Discussions > >>>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > >>> > >>> > >>>You have BTFM first. > >>> > >>> > -Original Message- > From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:18 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > > And RTFM. > > Geoff... > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:13 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > > STFW > > > -Original Message- > > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:10 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > > > > > Yeah exactly! > > Now how can I modify a field's value;e.g. Company: for all the > > mailboxes/CRs? Could I use DirImp/DirExp again or the header > > program? > > > > Thanks > > --Alex > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:58 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > > > > > Go figure??? > > > > Geoff... > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:49 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > > > > > Ok it worked BUT only after I did a DirExport of the container, > > deleted all but the mailbox to be removed. Copied and pasted it > > into the original file, by itself. It even deleted the domain > > account successfully. > > > > --Alex > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:37 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > > > > > And the EV says the import completed successfully? If > >so, I don't > > have a resolution to that p
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
We are closed to all E2K questions today. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 You do appear to be holding the fort down! - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 1:40 PM Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > Dude. Did you install the Exchange SP on the OWA box yet? SP3 or SP4. > You need to. > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:24 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Thanks, this is a great article, however there's no Transaction Server > folder under IIS in WIN2K! > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:54 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q248718 > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:40 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > I disabled the SMTP on the WIN2K box and installed the new OWA on it. > The WWW is running and I can http to it, but OWA doesn't work. It > comes up with > this error message: > > Error Type: > Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) > Object required: 'Application(...)' > /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 > > Any ideas? > > > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:25 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > E55 does not use the IIS SMTP engine unless you have specifically done > something for some reason to make it do so. As for the new OWA box, > uninstall the SMTP engine. Of the big 3 component (WWW, SMTP, FTP) All > you need is the WWW service. > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:20 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Ok. Stopping the IIS admin services requries stopping the Microsoft > SMTP server. Doesn't this disrupt the SMTP services on the EX box? I > know EX5.5 unlike EX2K doesn't (shouldn't) rely on this service, but > there have been times that I had to stop & start this service for > Exchange send & receive normally. And if I install OWA on a WIN2K > server, the SMTP service on IIS 5 > would provide the service? > I thought the SMTP under IIS 4 & 5 were very different. > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:06 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > No and No. > I would stop the IIS services on the orignal OWA box, but that's it. > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:03 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, > right? > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. > Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 > I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. > I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to > IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K > server serve this > up? > > Thanks > > Alex Alborzfard, MCSE > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archiv
Re: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
You do appear to be holding the fort down! - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 1:40 PM Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > Dude. Did you install the Exchange SP on the OWA box yet? SP3 or SP4. > You need to. > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:24 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Thanks, this is a great article, however there's no Transaction Server > folder under IIS in WIN2K! > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:54 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q248718 > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:40 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > I disabled the SMTP on the WIN2K box and installed the new OWA on it. The > WWW is running and I can http to it, but OWA doesn't work. It comes up with > this error message: > > Error Type: > Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) > Object required: 'Application(...)' > /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 > > Any ideas? > > > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:25 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > E55 does not use the IIS SMTP engine unless you have specifically done > something for some reason to make it do so. > As for the new OWA box, uninstall the SMTP engine. Of the big 3 component > (WWW, SMTP, FTP) All you need is the WWW service. > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:20 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Ok. Stopping the IIS admin services requries stopping the Microsoft SMTP > server. Doesn't this disrupt the SMTP services on the EX box? I know EX5.5 > unlike EX2K doesn't (shouldn't) rely on this service, but there have been > times that I had to stop & start this service for Exchange send & receive > normally. And if I install OWA on a WIN2K server, the SMTP service on IIS 5 > would provide the service? > I thought the SMTP under IIS 4 & 5 were very different. > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:06 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > No and No. > I would stop the IIS services on the orignal OWA box, but that's it. > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:03 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, right? > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. > Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 > > > EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 > I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. > I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX > need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this > up? > > Thanks > > Alex Alborzfard, MCSE > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
Dude. Did you install the Exchange SP on the OWA box yet? SP3 or SP4. You need to. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Thanks, this is a great article, however there's no Transaction Server folder under IIS in WIN2K! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q248718 -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 I disabled the SMTP on the WIN2K box and installed the new OWA on it. The WWW is running and I can http to it, but OWA doesn't work. It comes up with this error message: Error Type: Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) Object required: 'Application(...)' /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 Any ideas? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 E55 does not use the IIS SMTP engine unless you have specifically done something for some reason to make it do so. As for the new OWA box, uninstall the SMTP engine. Of the big 3 component (WWW, SMTP, FTP) All you need is the WWW service. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Ok. Stopping the IIS admin services requries stopping the Microsoft SMTP server. Doesn't this disrupt the SMTP services on the EX box? I know EX5.5 unlike EX2K doesn't (shouldn't) rely on this service, but there have been times that I had to stop & start this service for Exchange send & receive normally. And if I install OWA on a WIN2K server, the SMTP service on IIS 5 would provide the service? I thought the SMTP under IIS 4 & 5 were very different. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 No and No. I would stop the IIS services on the orignal OWA box, but that's it. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, right? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
Thanks, this is a great article, however there's no Transaction Server folder under IIS in WIN2K! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q248718 -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 I disabled the SMTP on the WIN2K box and installed the new OWA on it. The WWW is running and I can http to it, but OWA doesn't work. It comes up with this error message: Error Type: Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) Object required: 'Application(...)' /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 Any ideas? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 E55 does not use the IIS SMTP engine unless you have specifically done something for some reason to make it do so. As for the new OWA box, uninstall the SMTP engine. Of the big 3 component (WWW, SMTP, FTP) All you need is the WWW service. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Ok. Stopping the IIS admin services requries stopping the Microsoft SMTP server. Doesn't this disrupt the SMTP services on the EX box? I know EX5.5 unlike EX2K doesn't (shouldn't) rely on this service, but there have been times that I had to stop & start this service for Exchange send & receive normally. And if I install OWA on a WIN2K server, the SMTP service on IIS 5 would provide the service? I thought the SMTP under IIS 4 & 5 were very different. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 No and No. I would stop the IIS services on the orignal OWA box, but that's it. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, right? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Mirror Exchange
No >-Original Message- >From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:13 PM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: Mirror Exchange > > >Has anyone ever used doubletake to mirror an exchange server? > > >Brian > >_ >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mirror Exchange
Yes. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Dugas Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mirror Exchange Has anyone ever used doubletake to mirror an exchange server? Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mirror Exchange
Being as I appear to be the only one on duty, the answer would be no. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mirror Exchange Has anyone ever used doubletake to mirror an exchange server? Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mirror Exchange
Has anyone ever used doubletake to mirror an exchange server? Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q248718 -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 I disabled the SMTP on the WIN2K box and installed the new OWA on it. The WWW is running and I can http to it, but OWA doesn't work. It comes up with this error message: Error Type: Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) Object required: 'Application(...)' /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 Any ideas? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 E55 does not use the IIS SMTP engine unless you have specifically done something for some reason to make it do so. As for the new OWA box, uninstall the SMTP engine. Of the big 3 component (WWW, SMTP, FTP) All you need is the WWW service. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Ok. Stopping the IIS admin services requries stopping the Microsoft SMTP server. Doesn't this disrupt the SMTP services on the EX box? I know EX5.5 unlike EX2K doesn't (shouldn't) rely on this service, but there have been times that I had to stop & start this service for Exchange send & receive normally. And if I install OWA on a WIN2K server, the SMTP service on IIS 5 would provide the service? I thought the SMTP under IIS 4 & 5 were very different. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 No and No. I would stop the IIS services on the orignal OWA box, but that's it. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, right? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTE
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
I disabled the SMTP on the WIN2K box and installed the new OWA on it. The WWW is running and I can http to it, but OWA doesn't work. It comes up with this error message: Error Type: Microsoft VBScript runtime (0x800A01A8) Object required: 'Application(...)' /exchange/USA/logon.asp, line 12 Any ideas? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 E55 does not use the IIS SMTP engine unless you have specifically done something for some reason to make it do so. As for the new OWA box, uninstall the SMTP engine. Of the big 3 component (WWW, SMTP, FTP) All you need is the WWW service. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Ok. Stopping the IIS admin services requries stopping the Microsoft SMTP server. Doesn't this disrupt the SMTP services on the EX box? I know EX5.5 unlike EX2K doesn't (shouldn't) rely on this service, but there have been times that I had to stop & start this service for Exchange send & receive normally. And if I install OWA on a WIN2K server, the SMTP service on IIS 5 would provide the service? I thought the SMTP under IIS 4 & 5 were very different. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 No and No. I would stop the IIS services on the orignal OWA box, but that's it. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, right? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
E55 does not use the IIS SMTP engine unless you have specifically done something for some reason to make it do so. As for the new OWA box, uninstall the SMTP engine. Of the big 3 component (WWW, SMTP, FTP) All you need is the WWW service. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Ok. Stopping the IIS admin services requries stopping the Microsoft SMTP server. Doesn't this disrupt the SMTP services on the EX box? I know EX5.5 unlike EX2K doesn't (shouldn't) rely on this service, but there have been times that I had to stop & start this service for Exchange send & receive normally. And if I install OWA on a WIN2K server, the SMTP service on IIS 5 would provide the service? I thought the SMTP under IIS 4 & 5 were very different. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 No and No. I would stop the IIS services on the orignal OWA box, but that's it. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, right? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
Ok. Stopping the IIS admin services requries stopping the Microsoft SMTP server. Doesn't this disrupt the SMTP services on the EX box? I know EX5.5 unlike EX2K doesn't (shouldn't) rely on this service, but there have been times that I had to stop & start this service for Exchange send & receive normally. And if I install OWA on a WIN2K server, the SMTP service on IIS 5 would provide the service? I thought the SMTP under IIS 4 & 5 were very different. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 No and No. I would stop the IIS services on the orignal OWA box, but that's it. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, right? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Routing Change
One of the last things that I need to do in my Ex5.5 site before removing the last server and going native is to redo the "routing". Now, I have an E2k setup with 2 Front-ends and 2 back-end servers. On my last 5.5 server I need to have one of these servers take over the routing. Should I have one of the front-end servers be designated as the routing server? Or does removing the ex5.5 force the routing tables to be rebuilt with the 1st ex2000 server being assigned as the routing server? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sending POP3 Mail out via Exchange 2000
I am having problems getting a HP Jornada to send email out to external email address. I have it setup to receive email, but when I try to send mail out I get an error stating: "Your message could not be delivered to the following invalid recipients" What am I missing on getting either Exchange setup or the Jornada? Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP PC Systems Administrator MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
No and No. I would stop the IIS services on the orignal OWA box, but that's it. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, right? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
Thanks! And I HAVE TO stop the services and run the optimizer too, right? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
Oops. I was, once again, dead wrong. Thanks for keeping me honest. ;) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
Just install it on another box...Its really that simple. Yes, you can run OWA on W2K server. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
??? OWA is an Exchange feature, which is a little more specific than a IIS/W2K feature. The best I would imagine you can do is to use an E2K front-end server, but then you would naturally have to upgrade to Exchange 2000 enterprise edition. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5 EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Setup on a different machine on EX5.5
EX 5.5, SP4 on NT4 SP6 I need to move OWA to another server than EX box. I couldn't find anything on Technet or Online help. What changes to IIS/EX need to be made to make this happen? Can IIS 5 on a WIN2K server serve this up? Thanks Alex Alborzfard, MCSE _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc.
Like C-rations, but C-rations aren't that bad with a lot of salt and pepper. >-Original Message- >From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:18 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > >Aren't fruitcakes stale to begin with? =;-) They say you could bury a >fruitcake for 1000 years and it would still be the same as >when you first >put it there. Kind of scary, isn't it? > >Geoff... > > >-Original Message- >From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:06 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > >Remind me to send you a fruit cake (stale one!) for Christmas! > >-Original Message- >From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:45 PM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > >Always happy to chip in. > >>-Original Message- >>From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:35 PM >>To: Exchange Discussions >>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >>Thanks Tony you were great help!!! >> >>-Original Message- >>From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:30 PM >>To: Exchange Discussions >>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >>Booo. You could have let him squirm a bit. >> >> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:28 PM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >>> >>> >>>Acronyms... Buy the ... Manual, Read the ... Manual. etc... >>> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 1:24 PM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >>> >>> >>>What's all these BTFM RTFM STFW?! >>>Is this like Exchange secret language or something?!! >>> >>>--Alex >>> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:22 PM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >>> >>> >>>You have BTFM first. >>> >>> -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. And RTFM. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. STFW > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:10 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > > Yeah exactly! > Now how can I modify a field's value;e.g. Company: for all the > mailboxes/CRs? Could I use DirImp/DirExp again or the header > program? > > Thanks > --Alex > > -Original Message- > From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:58 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > > Go figure??? > > Geoff... > > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:49 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > > Ok it worked BUT only after I did a DirExport of the container, > deleted all but the mailbox to be removed. Copied and pasted it > into the original file, by itself. It even deleted the domain > account successfully. > > --Alex > > > -Original Message- > From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:37 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > > And the EV says the import completed successfully? If >so, I don't > have a resolution to that problem. > > Geoff... > > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:33 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > > Yup done that and that, no go! Weird, huh?! > > --Alex > > -Original Message- > From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >
RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc.
I have heard that there is really only 1 fruitcakeand that people keep shipping it to each other(to unload it...talk about not being welcome...it must have some kind of complex). Stale? never..also Ive heard that the chemical makeup of said... is such that it is impossible for it to go stale...so by it's nature it is as it was created and always will be... If only archeologists could find artifacts as old and in as good shape original origins of the fruitcake are said to be "Unknown" -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Aren't fruitcakes stale to begin with? =;-) They say you could bury a fruitcake for 1000 years and it would still be the same as when you first put it there. Kind of scary, isn't it? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Remind me to send you a fruit cake (stale one!) for Christmas! -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Always happy to chip in. >-Original Message- >From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:35 PM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > >Thanks Tony you were great help!!! > >-Original Message- >From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:30 PM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > >Booo. You could have let him squirm a bit. > > >>-Original Message- >>From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:28 PM >>To: Exchange Discussions >>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >>Acronyms... Buy the ... Manual, Read the ... Manual. etc... >> >>-Original Message- >>From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 1:24 PM >>To: Exchange Discussions >>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >>What's all these BTFM RTFM STFW?! >>Is this like Exchange secret language or something?!! >> >>--Alex >> >>-Original Message- >>From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:22 PM >>To: Exchange Discussions >>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >>You have BTFM first. >> >> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:18 PM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >>> >>> >>>And RTFM. >>> >>>Geoff... >>> >>> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:13 PM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >>> >>> >>>STFW >>> -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Yeah exactly! Now how can I modify a field's value;e.g. Company: for all the mailboxes/CRs? Could I use DirImp/DirExp again or the header program? Thanks --Alex -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Go figure??? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Ok it worked BUT only after I did a DirExport of the container, deleted all but the mailbox to be removed. Copied and pasted it into the original file, by itself. It even deleted the domain account successfully. --Alex -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. And the EV says the import completed successfully? If so, I don't have a resolution to that problem. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions >
RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc.
Aren't fruitcakes stale to begin with? =;-) They say you could bury a fruitcake for 1000 years and it would still be the same as when you first put it there. Kind of scary, isn't it? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Remind me to send you a fruit cake (stale one!) for Christmas! -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Always happy to chip in. >-Original Message- >From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:35 PM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > >Thanks Tony you were great help!!! > >-Original Message- >From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:30 PM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > >Booo. You could have let him squirm a bit. > > >>-Original Message- >>From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:28 PM >>To: Exchange Discussions >>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >>Acronyms... Buy the ... Manual, Read the ... Manual. etc... >> >>-Original Message- >>From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 1:24 PM >>To: Exchange Discussions >>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >>What's all these BTFM RTFM STFW?! >>Is this like Exchange secret language or something?!! >> >>--Alex >> >>-Original Message- >>From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:22 PM >>To: Exchange Discussions >>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >>You have BTFM first. >> >> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:18 PM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >>> >>> >>>And RTFM. >>> >>>Geoff... >>> >>> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:13 PM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >>> >>> >>>STFW >>> -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Yeah exactly! Now how can I modify a field's value;e.g. Company: for all the mailboxes/CRs? Could I use DirImp/DirExp again or the header program? Thanks --Alex -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Go figure??? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Ok it worked BUT only after I did a DirExport of the container, deleted all but the mailbox to be removed. Copied and pasted it into the original file, by itself. It even deleted the domain account successfully. --Alex -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. And the EV says the import completed successfully? If so, I don't have a resolution to that problem. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Yup done that and that, no go! Weird, huh?! --Alex -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Ahhh, did you refresh the screen? If so, take out the CRs and try it just with the Mailbox/Delete line. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: R
RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc.
Remind me to send you a fruit cake (stale one!) for Christmas! -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Always happy to chip in. >-Original Message- >From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:35 PM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > >Thanks Tony you were great help!!! > >-Original Message- >From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:30 PM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > >Booo. You could have let him squirm a bit. > > >>-Original Message- >>From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:28 PM >>To: Exchange Discussions >>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >>Acronyms... Buy the ... Manual, Read the ... Manual. etc... >> >>-Original Message- >>From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 1:24 PM >>To: Exchange Discussions >>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >>What's all these BTFM RTFM STFW?! >>Is this like Exchange secret language or something?!! >> >>--Alex >> >>-Original Message- >>From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:22 PM >>To: Exchange Discussions >>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >>You have BTFM first. >> >> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:18 PM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >>> >>> >>>And RTFM. >>> >>>Geoff... >>> >>> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:13 PM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >>> >>> >>>STFW >>> -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Yeah exactly! Now how can I modify a field's value;e.g. Company: for all the mailboxes/CRs? Could I use DirImp/DirExp again or the header program? Thanks --Alex -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Go figure??? Geoff... -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Ok it worked BUT only after I did a DirExport of the container, deleted all but the mailbox to be removed. Copied and pasted it into the original file, by itself. It even deleted the domain account successfully. --Alex -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. And the EV says the import completed successfully? If so, I don't have a resolution to that problem. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Yup done that and that, no go! Weird, huh?! --Alex -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Ahhh, did you refresh the screen? If so, take out the CRs and try it just with the Mailbox/Delete line. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. Yes in the same file. I tried this first on a dummy container I created with mailbox & CR in it and it worked fine. But when I did it on the real container, only CRs were deleted. There are no errors in EV and import said the deletion was successful, but the object is still there. I even added the Home Server valu
RE: W2K Backup
You've shown yours, now I'll show mine...
(Needs grep, recode, and blat)
rem *
rem *
rem * Perform fullback to whatever tape is in the drive and email
rem * report
rem *
rem * Ken Cornetet - 06/10/2002
rem *
rem * Revision History
rem *
rem * WhenWhoWhat
rem * ---
rem * 06/10/2002 Ken Cornetet Original Issue
rem * 06/24/2002 Ken Cornetet Added RSM command per Q267574
rem *
rem *
set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
set SMTP=ntserver1
set NAME=FULL BACKUP %DATE% %TIME%
set LOGS=%USERPROFILE%\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Windows
NT\NTBackup\data
c:
cd \backup
rem Delete any extranious log files
del "%LOGS%\backup*.log"
rem
rem * Have removable storage management look at tape in drive
rem * (See Q267574 for details)
rem
start /wait rsm refresh /lf"BNCHMARK DLT1 SCSI Sequential Device"
c:\bin\sleep 30
rem
rem * Do Backup
rem
start /wait ntbackup backup @c:\backup\everything.bks /M normal /J "%NAME%"
/P DLT /N "%NAME%" /l:s /HC:on /UM /D "%NAME%"
rem
rem * find newest (should be only) log file
rem
dir /s /b /o-d "%LOGS%\backup*.log" >c:\backup\backup.tmp
set /P FILE= log.txt
rem
rem * Append list of open files to the report
rem
echo OPEN FILES >>log.txt
net file >>log.txt
rem
rem * Set subject for email
rem
set SUBJ=Backup ran OK
grep -v "Error: You do not have permission" > log1.txt
findstr /i error: log1.txt
if not ERRORLEVEL 1 set SUBJ=Backup ran - FAILED
rem
rem * Send email
rem
c:\bin\blat log.txt -t %RECIPIENT% -subject "%SUBJ%" -server %SMTP% -f
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
copy log.txt \\ntserver1\default
rem
rem * Move log file to our directory
rem
move /Y "%FILE%" c:\backup
-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 11:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W2K Backup
Thanks to everyone for the useful feedback re W2K Backups for Exchange.
I've finally managed to get my backups running automatically. I've
created a batch file (see below) that works quite efficiently. This
is heavily plagiarized from various sources so my apologies to anyone
I haven't acknowledged here. You just need to replace the names
for the .bks and tape drive (i.e. " c:\backups\daily.bks" and "ARCHIVE
Python 06408-XXX SCSI Sequential Device") and it'll work. I've tried it on 2
different servers with different tape drives and it does the job nicely.
Regards
Tony
rsm.exe refresh /lf"ARCHIVE Python 06408-XXX SCSI Sequential Device"
sleep 10
for /f "Tokens=1-4 Delims=/ " %%i in ('date /t') do set dt=%%i-%%j-%%k-%%l
for /f "Tokens=1" %%i in ('time /t') do set tm=-%%i
set tm=%tm::=-%
set dtt=%dt%%tm%
ntbackup.exe backup "@c:\backups\daily.bks" /n "Daily Backup %dtt%" /d
"Daily Backup %dtt%" /v:yes /r:no /rs:no /hc:on /m normal /j "%dtt%" /l:f
/UM /p "4mm DDS"
rsm.exe eject /pf"Daily Backup %dtt% - 1" /astart
Known bug - http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q267574
Anyway the trick is to run rsm and have it inventory your drive before
running ntbackup.
Another little gotcha - the log file produced by ntbackup is unicode. If you
plan on having a script peek at the log file, this might trip you up.
-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 4:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W2K Backup
The main problem I'm having is with the scheduling of the backups. I know
this is a well documented problem but the MS fixes aren't too hot. I'm
currently working on a backup script that will get around the numerous bugs
but have had problems in this area; i.e. even with a script I'm finding that
the backup sometimes fails because the server thinks there's "no unused
media of the appropriate type" even though there's a tape in the dri
RE: HP/Compaq EVA
If it's all one disk group, then performance will be at the least common denominator of the various virtual disk architectures at best. So, do you care? I dunno. RAID5 runs about 4x slower than RAID1 on writes in many cases, so unless there are 4x spindles available in the disk group, you're worse off without even looking at the application. Exchange log performance is optimized by having dedicated spindles that don't have to re-seek for every write. So beyond the difference in RAID level write performance, you have an application level difference. If they're saying that the EVA will give you the same number of I/O's for both the logs and the databases as you would have seen for just the logs on a standalone set of spindles, then go for it. What's not stated is what your performance needs are. What I/O rate will the EVA deliver to the log volume on a sustainable basis? Is that enough to support your user load? Any other question is just an academic exercise. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Rosenthal, Daniel A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:11 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: HP/Compaq EVA Subject: RE: HP/Compaq EVA As I understand it we will have exclusive access to a disk group; the other disk group in the EVA will be used for other apps. With that assumption do we care about the differences between vraid1 and vraid5 when all the physical volumes will be within this disk group? As I understand it, splitting this group into 2 or more will reduce the number of spindles, reduce the EVA-based fault protection and reduce the overall performance. Daniel Rosenthal National Grid USA Messaging Support (508)389-2625 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HP/Compaq EVA Just so happens that I've been in an internal discussion about this and that's what I'm being told myself. I don't disagree with the principles at all. However, your performance really will be dependent upon your application mix and how you map them to the virtual arrays. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rosenthal, Daniel A. Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HP/Compaq EVA Does anyone have any experiences with HP/Compaq's Enterprise Virtual Array in regards to Exchange 2000? They'd like us to believe, it seems, that the rules about transaction logs and databases being on seperate physical volumes do not apply using this technology, because fault tolerance is spread across so many volumes in the disk group. Also they would have us believe that with vraid5 for both logs and databases we'd see no performance issues. The big stress is that this isn't your older brother's scsii raid anymore. Thanks. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it, are confidential to National Grid and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the National Grid USA Help desk on 508-389-3375. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reply for Jennifer Baker
Then it's nothing to do with your PIX and everything to do with DNS and your SMTP VS. (I'm also not Jennifer) > -Original Message- > From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Monday, August 26, 2002 07:45 AM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Reply for Jennifer Baker > Subject: Reply for Jennifer Baker > > > am i forwarding my mail to what smarthost? im sorry i dont > think i know what you are asking? im not forwarding any > messages. im receiving fine, but cant send out... > > thanks, > Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reply for Jennifer Baker
Check dns. Try an nslookup (mx) on the exchange server. For some reason I got the impression that you replaced your sendmail relay server with an exchange relay. Firewall configuration changes for smtp mail should not be necessary if the new server is replacing a server that was working properly. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Reply for Jennifer Baker am i forwarding my mail to what smarthost? im sorry i dont think i know what you are asking? im not forwarding any messages. im receiving fine, but cant send out... thanks, Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: REPLY for ED Crowley
Sorry, I'm not Ed. But it looks like your DNS is screwed up. Shouldn't have anything to do with mailguard, since it's an outbound SMTP connection. Unless your PIX is between your E2k server and a smarthost. Make sure your SMTP virtual server is pointed to a good DNS server that is set up to allow forwarding unresolvable requests. > -Original Message- > From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Monday, August 26, 2002 07:08 AM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: REPLY for ED Crowley > Subject: REPLY for ED Crowley > > > Hi Ed, > > i cant send out from my exchange 2000 box so im replying to > your questions through SWYNK. > > yes i have the mailguard feature turned off. this is the > message that i get when i try to send out: > > This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. > > THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. > > YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. > > Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. > >xxx@x > > then it gets delayed for a while then i get a report saying > it could not be sent. > > thanks for the help with this.. > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: REPLY for ED Crowley
bob -- Do a quick check to see if your firewall is locking you down to tight: you probably have something like this in your pix config: no fixup protocol smtp 25 conduit permit tcp host x.x.x.x eq smtp any (hitcnt=) conduit permit tcp host x.x.x.x eq 443 any (hitcnt=) where x.x.x.x is the outside IP of your exchange server = Make this change: conduit permit tcp host x.x.x.x eq any (then you have to do a "clear xlate") Now try sending mail. If it works, you have a firewall config issue. I'd suggest opening port 80 next (maybe the firewall is preventing outside dns lookups?). Also, try pinging some outside places from the exchange server --- some places you've never been, like www.unc.edu (that's our site) Good luck! Tom Gray, Network Engineer All Kinds of Minds & The Center for Development and Learning University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AT&T Net: (919)960- at the firewall do a conduit permit and allow all ( eq any any) and try it out. If it still doesn't work check the dns settings on your exchange box!) -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: REPLY for ED Crowley Hi Ed, i cant send out from my exchange 2000 box so im replying to your questions through SWYNK. yes i have the mailguard feature turned off. this is the message that i get when i try to send out: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. xxx@x then it gets delayed for a while then i get a report saying it could not be sent. thanks for the help with this.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Pickup directory
I know you have verified the permissions already, but thats what it sounds like. Maybe after a few more coffees something else will pop in my head. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Okay, now we may be getting somewhere... The archive directory was already there, so I deleted it to test to see if restarting the IMS would recreate it. It did not. Nothing logged in the event logs besides the IMS stop and start events. Aaron -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Ok, final shot, then maybe others have some ideas. :) Was the archive directory created underneath the pickup dir when you restarted the IMS? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Yah, did that too. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 6:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Ok, dumb question: Did you check the permissions on the message, i.e. the file itself? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Yup, SA has Change access to the pickup directory. I have gone thru all the permissions and verified the registry settings according to Q319890. Aaron -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Does the Exch SA account have the necessary permissions to access that file? What troubleshooting have you already done? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC Pickup directory Hi all, I am placing a RFC822 compliant message in my Exch 5.5 SP4 (NT4.0 SP6a) IMC pickup directory, but the message never gets delivered and the file just stays in that directory. I've reviewed a number of Q articles to try and troubleshoot why the pickup directory doesn't work but nothing has helped. Anyone have any ideas what might be wrong? Thanks. Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitese
Exchange 5.5 in SBS 4.5 w/SP6 - Shared Calendar Problem
We have a problem where several users who were sharing their Outlook Calendars for a long period of time, were not able to use the Calendar any more. "Error: The itme could not be saved to this folder. The folder has been deleted or moved, or you do not have permission. Do you want to save a copy of it in the default folder for the item?" This occurred shortly after our main SBS4.5 SCSI HDD would no longer boot up NT4.0/SP6. The mirror drive was used and the main drive taken off line for warranty replacement. We suspect the mirror drive was not a 100% mirror of the exchange and that some data is missing or corrupted on the mirror drive. Any ideas on what this could be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HP/Compaq EVA
As I understand it we will have exclusive access to a disk group; the other disk group in the EVA will be used for other apps. With that assumption do we care about the differences between vraid1 and vraid5 when all the physical volumes will be within this disk group? As I understand it, splitting this group into 2 or more will reduce the number of spindles, reduce the EVA-based fault protection and reduce the overall performance. Daniel Rosenthal National Grid USA Messaging Support (508)389-2625 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HP/Compaq EVA Just so happens that I've been in an internal discussion about this and that's what I'm being told myself. I don't disagree with the principles at all. However, your performance really will be dependent upon your application mix and how you map them to the virtual arrays. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rosenthal, Daniel A. Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HP/Compaq EVA Does anyone have any experiences with HP/Compaq's Enterprise Virtual Array in regards to Exchange 2000? They'd like us to believe, it seems, that the rules about transaction logs and databases being on seperate physical volumes do not apply using this technology, because fault tolerance is spread across so many volumes in the disk group. Also they would have us believe that with vraid5 for both logs and databases we'd see no performance issues. The big stress is that this isn't your older brother's scsii raid anymore. Thanks. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it, are confidential to National Grid and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the National Grid USA Help desk on 508-389-3375. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Pickup directory
Okay, now we may be getting somewhere... The archive directory was already there, so I deleted it to test to see if restarting the IMS would recreate it. It did not. Nothing logged in the event logs besides the IMS stop and start events. Aaron -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Ok, final shot, then maybe others have some ideas. :) Was the archive directory created underneath the pickup dir when you restarted the IMS? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Yah, did that too. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 6:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Ok, dumb question: Did you check the permissions on the message, i.e. the file itself? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Yup, SA has Change access to the pickup directory. I have gone thru all the permissions and verified the registry settings according to Q319890. Aaron -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Does the Exch SA account have the necessary permissions to access that file? What troubleshooting have you already done? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC Pickup directory Hi all, I am placing a RFC822 compliant message in my Exch 5.5 SP4 (NT4.0 SP6a) IMC pickup directory, but the message never gets delivered and the file just stays in that directory. I've reviewed a number of Q articles to try and troubleshoot why the pickup directory doesn't work but nothing has helped. Anyone have any ideas what might be wrong? Thanks. Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: IMC Pickup directory
Ok, final shot, then maybe others have some ideas. :) Was the archive directory created underneath the pickup dir when you restarted the IMS? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Yah, did that too. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 6:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Ok, dumb question: Did you check the permissions on the message, i.e. the file itself? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Yup, SA has Change access to the pickup directory. I have gone thru all the permissions and verified the registry settings according to Q319890. Aaron -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Does the Exch SA account have the necessary permissions to access that file? What troubleshooting have you already done? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC Pickup directory Hi all, I am placing a RFC822 compliant message in my Exch 5.5 SP4 (NT4.0 SP6a) IMC pickup directory, but the message never gets delivered and the file just stays in that directory. I've reviewed a number of Q articles to try and troubleshoot why the pickup directory doesn't work but nothing has helped. Anyone have any ideas what might be wrong? Thanks. Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any d
Reply for Jennifer Baker
am i forwarding my mail to what smarthost? im sorry i dont think i know what you are asking? im not forwarding any messages. im receiving fine, but cant send out... thanks, Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spell Check
I went down a rabbit hole last night.. (didn't get her name, though) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spell Check lol. True, but based on the information provided, I think there's a logical non-random and consistent explanation for the behavior the user is seeing. Additional information might change my opinion, but I'm not willingly going down that rabbit hole. > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 12:41 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Spell Check > > > Using Word. Still user error. > > > -Original Message- > From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 1:35 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Spell Check > > > If security is not set correctly in Windows 2000, Word > Spellcheck will not be active although other functions of > Word will operate fine. Not exactly same situation, but maybe > it has something to do with user rights. > > Bill Kuhl > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 11:00 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Spell Check > > > User error. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 10:52 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Spell Check > > > > > > I have a user with Outlook 2000. When she replies to messages > > (usually from within the company), the spell check shortcut is > > inactive sometimes. There's no consistency. > > Sometimes it is active, sometimes it is inactive. Her > > messages are in HTML format. No upgrades or updates have > > been done on her machine. What would cause the spell check > > to start behaving as it is? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > > The information contained in this email message is privileged > and confidential information intended only for the use of the > individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby > notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this > message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler > Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or > email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. > > == > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Pickup directory
Yah, did that too. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 6:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Ok, dumb question: Did you check the permissions on the message, i.e. the file itself? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Yup, SA has Change access to the pickup directory. I have gone thru all the permissions and verified the registry settings according to Q319890. Aaron -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Pickup directory Does the Exch SA account have the necessary permissions to access that file? What troubleshooting have you already done? -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC Pickup directory Hi all, I am placing a RFC822 compliant message in my Exch 5.5 SP4 (NT4.0 SP6a) IMC pickup directory, but the message never gets delivered and the file just stays in that directory. I've reviewed a number of Q articles to try and troubleshoot why the pickup directory doesn't work but nothing has helped. Anyone have any ideas what might be wrong? Thanks. Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REPLY for ED Crowley
Hi Ed, i cant send out from my exchange 2000 box so im replying to your questions through SWYNK. yes i have the mailguard feature turned off. this is the message that i get when i try to send out: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. xxx@x then it gets delayed for a while then i get a report saying it could not be sent. thanks for the help with this.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc.
http://www.ocabj.net/archives/kb/Q209354.asp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Alex Alborzfard Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 16:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. What's all these BTFM RTFM STFW?! Is this like Exchange secret language or something?!! --Alex -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. You have BTFM first. >-Original Message- >From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:18 PM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > >And RTFM. > >Geoff... > > >-Original Message- >From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:13 PM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. > > >STFW > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:10 PM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >> Yeah exactly! >> Now how can I modify a field's value;e.g. Company: for all the >> mailboxes/CRs? Could I use DirImp/DirExp again or the header program? >> >> Thanks >> --Alex >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:58 PM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >> Go figure??? >> >> Geoff... >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:49 PM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >> Ok it worked BUT only after I did a DirExport of the container, >> deleted all but the mailbox to be removed. Copied and pasted it into >> the original file, by itself. It even deleted the domain account >> successfully. >> >> --Alex >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:37 PM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >> And the EV says the import completed successfully? If so, I don't >> have a resolution to that problem. >> >> Geoff... >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:33 PM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >> Yup done that and that, no go! Weird, huh?! >> >> --Alex >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:30 PM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >> Ahhh, did you refresh the screen? If so, take out the CRs and try it >> just with the Mailbox/Delete line. >> >> Geoff... >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:23 PM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >> Yes in the same file. I tried this first on a dummy container I >> created with mailbox & CR in it and it worked fine. But when I did it >> on the real container, only CRs were deleted. There are no errors in >> EV and import said the deletion was successful, but the object is >> still there. I even added the Home Server value, but it didn't make >> any difference. >> >> --Alex >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:20 PM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >> Did you have CRs and Mailboxes together in one document? And what is >> the error code in EV say? >> >> Geoff... >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 3:12 PM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >> Thanks Geoff, it worked for the CRs, but not for the Mailboxes. Any >> ideas why not? >> >> Thanks >> --Alex, MCSE >> Network Errand Boy >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 2:14 PM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Bulk deletion of Mailboxes/CRs, etc. >> >> >> You add a column, name it Mode and in every cell that you want to >> delete a User, you type Delete. >> >> Geoff... >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 2:06 PM >> To: Exchange Discussions >> Subject: RE: Bulk del
PowerControls for Exchange
We are investigating the use of the product below - have any of you guys used it? If so, any comments on its usage? Thanks in advance, Miles <> Ok you guys have to check this out, it's called PowerControls, by Ontrack (the famous data recovery company). http://www.ontrack.com/powercontrols/ It will actually open an offline .edb database in its entirety and lets you recover data from it directly to a pst. Basically it renders brick level backups obsoletebut it can also search through the database as well. I tested it and it actually works. Single server pricing is $950, which isn't all that bad considering what it does. We need this tool. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
