RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to the list (been monitoring and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I have always wondered, what is the correct pronunciation of your name. I would hate to insult your greatness by mispronouncing it when paying homage. k-thool-oo Get thee to H.P.Lovecraft. See also Chaosium Games. (http://www.chaosium.com/) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need ammo
Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Have you told them of the joys of winzip? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
No. Not me at all. I'm just visualising an alternative version of Ivor the Engine, where instead of Jones the Steam (there he is, look) we have Jones the Tentacle. -Original Message- From: Hanna, Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 September 2002 23:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones Slight Welsh accent? Les? Is that you? -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 September 2002 02:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones You can always initiate a self-punishment session at any time. And, yes, it's pronounced the way it's spelled. It sounds like a universe being sucked backwards through a flexi-straw into a tailpipe somehow capable of saying Jones at the end, with a slight Welsh accent. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lentz, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones ..And I always pronounced it as hoe-neez. Like cahones without the ca. Must I wait for direct order before whipping myself with frayed cat5 cabling, or do I start now? -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones It's pronounced JONES, like cones, but with a J. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones Pardon me for the confusion, I meant the last name... Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones You pronounce it the same way it is spelled. Kind of sounds like spitting out a watermelon seed. [1] [1] Begging forgiveness from Kimmie for stealing her line. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: To Great Cthulhu Jones A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to the list (been monitoring and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I have always wondered, what is the correct pronunciation of your name. I would hate to insult your greatness by mispronouncing it when paying homage. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by
RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
Heh heh. Trouble? Cthulhu's no trouble at all, unless. Oh. You may have a problem. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 September 2002 08:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones Ray, Are you trying to destroy the world :-), now Repeat after me 'you do not say the Cth word' ANYTIME, (calling his name is just like that is asking for trouble), and I just like to say, I like the way everyone avoided the middle name as if it didn't exist ;-). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 September 2002 02:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones You can always initiate a self-punishment session at any time. And, yes, it's pronounced the way it's spelled. It sounds like a universe being sucked backwards through a flexi-straw into a tailpipe somehow capable of saying Jones at the end, with a slight Welsh accent. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lentz, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones ..And I always pronounced it as hoe-neez. Like cahones without the ca. Must I wait for direct order before whipping myself with frayed cat5 cabling, or do I start now? -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones It's pronounced JONES, like cones, but with a J. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones Pardon me for the confusion, I meant the last name... Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones You pronounce it the same way it is spelled. Kind of sounds like spitting out a watermelon seed. [1] [1] Begging forgiveness from Kimmie for stealing her line. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: To Great Cthulhu Jones A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to the list (been monitoring and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I have always wondered, what is the correct pronunciation of your name. I would hate to insult your greatness by mispronouncing it when paying homage. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be
RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
Bah! -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 September 2002 00:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones Did you hear Sheep in the Back ground? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hanna, Keith Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones Slight Welsh accent? Les? Is that you? -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 September 2002 02:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones You can always initiate a self-punishment session at any time. And, yes, it's pronounced the way it's spelled. It sounds like a universe being sucked backwards through a flexi-straw into a tailpipe somehow capable of saying Jones at the end, with a slight Welsh accent. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lentz, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones ..And I always pronounced it as hoe-neez. Like cahones without the ca. Must I wait for direct order before whipping myself with frayed cat5 cabling, or do I start now? -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones It's pronounced JONES, like cones, but with a J. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones Pardon me for the confusion, I meant the last name... Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones You pronounce it the same way it is spelled. Kind of sounds like spitting out a watermelon seed. [1] [1] Begging forgiveness from Kimmie for stealing her line. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: To Great Cthulhu Jones A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to the list (been monitoring and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I have always wondered, what is the correct pronunciation of your name. I would hate to insult your greatness by mispronouncing it when paying homage. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
Aunt Bessie says hi, and when are you going to visit? -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 September 2002 03:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones We're related, yes. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hanna, Keith Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones Slight Welsh accent? Les? Is that you? -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 September 2002 02:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones You can always initiate a self-punishment session at any time. And, yes, it's pronounced the way it's spelled. It sounds like a universe being sucked backwards through a flexi-straw into a tailpipe somehow capable of saying Jones at the end, with a slight Welsh accent. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lentz, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones ..And I always pronounced it as hoe-neez. Like cahones without the ca. Must I wait for direct order before whipping myself with frayed cat5 cabling, or do I start now? -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones It's pronounced JONES, like cones, but with a J. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones Pardon me for the confusion, I meant the last name... Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones You pronounce it the same way it is spelled. Kind of sounds like spitting out a watermelon seed. [1] [1] Begging forgiveness from Kimmie for stealing her line. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: To Great Cthulhu Jones A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to the list (been monitoring and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I have always wondered, what is the correct pronunciation of your name. I would hate to insult your greatness by mispronouncing it when paying homage. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
I thought it was Cuth Lah, as in the thing (cuthlah) that trapped Angel in the 3rd Buffy series. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 September 2002 10:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to the list (been monitoring and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I have always wondered, what is the correct pronunciation of your name. I would hate to insult your greatness by mispronouncing it when paying homage. k-thool-oo Get thee to H.P.Lovecraft. See also Chaosium Games. (http://www.chaosium.com/) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the Company. This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the IT department by telephone on +44 (0)117 311 8555 or via email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], including a copy of this message. Please then delete this email and destroy any copies of it. * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
Sacrilege! Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Exchange.ListServe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 September 2002 11:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones I thought it was Cuth Lah, as in the thing (cuthlah) that trapped Angel in the 3rd Buffy series. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 September 2002 10:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to the list (been monitoring and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I have always wondered, what is the correct pronunciation of your name. I would hate to insult your greatness by mispronouncing it when paying homage. k-thool-oo Get thee to H.P.Lovecraft. See also Chaosium Games. (http://www.chaosium.com/) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the Company. This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the IT department by telephone on +44 (0)117 311 8555 or via email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], including a copy of this message. Please then delete this email and destroy any copies of it. * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000
So what you are saying is to make the ex5.5 a cost of 2. The default cost in ex2000 is 1. Therefore it will use ex2000 for all outbound traffic? What will happen when I remove the IMS on Ex5.5? Will it automatically recalc the routing to the ex2000 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Did you change the cost on the 5.5 one? If they're all cost 1, then mail will continue to follow the route it knows. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:38 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Running Exchange in mixed mode, with final exchange 5.5 server ready to be removed. I have changed the site addressing to my new ex2000 server and recalculated routing, but, noticed that email is still going out via the IMS on the Ex5.5 server. Inbound mail comes in OK, just outgoing email goes out via the Ex5.5 IMS. I've stopped the services - but - guess that I actually need to remove the IMS from the ex5.5 server in-order to get mail routed outbound via ex2000. Do I need to setup a new smtp connector in ex2000 or is this automatic after I removed the ex5.5 IMS? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K
Eric, Active Directory is a requirement for Exchange 2000. If you have no plans to move to AD, then I would go with Ex 5.5. Denny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K A much improved OWA, for one - a steadily decreasing lack of support for another. Especially if you're starting from scratch, I recommend Exch2K. AD will not hurt you, and you need not switch to native mode, ever, unless you wish. David -Original Message- From: Eric Fors, II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K I've recently come into the need to implement Exchange server for my new employer. I have been blissfully ignorant of all things related to Exchange for nearly a year and a half now, but alas that is at an end. I've had substantial experience with Exchange with my previous employer, but when I was hired on here they already had some other e-mail product and were not interested in switching to Exchange. Now they are and I am needing to catch up. My experience with Exchange goes back to the RC for Exchange 4.0 and runs up to EX55 SP3. EX2K was only just starting to be implemented widely by the more adventurous members of this list at the time I changed jobs. With that lengthy pre-amble, here's my question: I have seen some of the recent posts with scary stories about what to expect when upgrading EX55 to EX2K and read some other things about AD implementations gone awry. These cause me to wonder if it is worth it to install EX2K? We already own EX55 and our Windows networking is run strictly on a domains model, (no AD anywhere and none planned in the near future.) Our implementation will be rather small, one site, one server, about 50 users, and a handful of remote users. What if any advantages would there be to me to implement EX2K over EX55? Thanx, Eric Fors, II BTW - I'm glad to see that the Ed's and Missy K. are still on the list. Your posts in the archives have pulled my proverbial bacon out of the fire more than a few times. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need ammo
We have one customer with a 100MB SMTP limit which they say needed for some large CAD engineering drawings they were sending. One of these got caught in an email loop and generated so many transaction log files that it killed the server. We spent the good portion of a day recovering from that disaster. Most of our customers have reasonable limits 10-15MB. Have them use Winzip. It will save them time and you headaches. Just tell them the story above and imagine what their CEO would say if he/she finds out it was them who caused him/her a delay in getting the CEO's email sent. They might find themselves on the unemployment line like the guy above did. Nate -- From: Andrey Fyodorov Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2002 16:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
Sweet shamblin' shoggoths, NO! (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 5:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones I thought it was Cuth Lah, as in the thing (cuthlah) that trapped Angel in the 3rd Buffy series. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 September 2002 10:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to the list (been monitoring and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I have always wondered, what is the correct pronunciation of your name. I would hate to insult your greatness by mispronouncing it when paying homage. k-thool-oo Get thee to H.P.Lovecraft. See also Chaosium Games. (http://www.chaosium.com/) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the Company. This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the IT department by telephone on +44 (0)117 311 8555 or via email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], including a copy of this message. Please then delete this email and destroy any copies of it. * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
I'm real busy this aeon. Tell her I'll try and be by for the next syzygy. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Les Bessant Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones Aunt Bessie says hi, and when are you going to visit? -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 September 2002 03:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones We're related, yes. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hanna, Keith Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones Slight Welsh accent? Les? Is that you? -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 September 2002 02:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones You can always initiate a self-punishment session at any time. And, yes, it's pronounced the way it's spelled. It sounds like a universe being sucked backwards through a flexi-straw into a tailpipe somehow capable of saying Jones at the end, with a slight Welsh accent. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lentz, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones ..And I always pronounced it as hoe-neez. Like cahones without the ca. Must I wait for direct order before whipping myself with frayed cat5 cabling, or do I start now? -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones It's pronounced JONES, like cones, but with a J. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones Pardon me for the confusion, I meant the last name... Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones You pronounce it the same way it is spelled. Kind of sounds like spitting out a watermelon seed. [1] [1] Begging forgiveness from Kimmie for stealing her line. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: To Great Cthulhu Jones A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to the list (been monitoring and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I have always wondered, what is the correct pronunciation of your name. I would hate to insult your greatness by mispronouncing it when paying homage. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000
Yes but if you don't cost it out first, it will still be using it when you remove it (i.e. if you have high volume, this can lead to stranded/lost mail). -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 7:28 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 So what you are saying is to make the ex5.5 a cost of 2. The default cost in ex2000 is 1. Therefore it will use ex2000 for all outbound traffic? What will happen when I remove the IMS on Ex5.5? Will it automatically recalc the routing to the ex2000 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Did you change the cost on the 5.5 one? If they're all cost 1, then mail will continue to follow the route it knows. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:38 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Running Exchange in mixed mode, with final exchange 5.5 server ready to be removed. I have changed the site addressing to my new ex2000 server and recalculated routing, but, noticed that email is still going out via the IMS on the Ex5.5 server. Inbound mail comes in OK, just outgoing email goes out via the Ex5.5 IMS. I've stopped the services - but - guess that I actually need to remove the IMS from the ex5.5 server in-order to get mail routed outbound via ex2000. Do I need to setup a new smtp connector in ex2000 or is this automatic after I removed the ex5.5 IMS? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need ammo
Another alternative: educate people about FTP. You know, the *other* Transfer Protocol. SMTP is for simple messages. FTP is for files. There ya go. Tell 'em CJ sent ya. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Couch, Nate Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo We have one customer with a 100MB SMTP limit which they say needed for some large CAD engineering drawings they were sending. One of these got caught in an email loop and generated so many transaction log files that it killed the server. We spent the good portion of a day recovering from that disaster. Most of our customers have reasonable limits 10-15MB. Have them use Winzip. It will save them time and you headaches. Just tell them the story above and imagine what their CEO would say if he/she finds out it was them who caused him/her a delay in getting the CEO's email sent. They might find themselves on the unemployment line like the guy above did. Nate -- From: Andrey Fyodorov Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2002 16:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge
Still, a good laugh, thinking of all those lawyers going ape because they
can't read the PST which has the files they desperately need for the
{tobacco, gun safety, SUV tire, asbestos, silicone implant, fen-phen, etc.}
case they're trying.
Ooooh! I think I found a new punishment for legal professionals! Sweet! I
can always use fresh ideas for those guys.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge
Just for mailing to lawyers then they will copy to hard drive. Yes I know
about it is written to open.
- Original Message -
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:10 PM
Subject: RE: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge
Ho ho ho. PST on a CD.
Good luck reading *that*!
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge
Not a problem. We figured most of the monthly runs will be under that. In
fact will make them under 650 so they will fit on a CD. Still can't
believe
I missed it in the manual. My only other possible problem is the older
version doesn't have that feature. If not will have to load up 2000
workstation for the new Exmerge. The new one does not run on NT4.0
- Original Message -
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 9:58 PM
Subject: RE: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge
Good news is, if you get a PST over 2GB in size, you only have to
truncate
the file size to read what's in it!
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge
Thanks Andrey. I found it. I could I have missed it. Anyhow it looks
like
I
will have experiment with that setting. I am guessing I may have to do
this
in two runs. One to get the user names that contain the subject matter
and
then run it again with the all mailboxes being put into one PST once the
ones are identified in the first run.
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 3:25 PM
Subject: RE: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge
Yes this is possible with ExMerge. ExMErge documentation as well as the
default ExMerge.ini file show such a configuration.
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge
Fellow Admins. Is there away to run exmerge and put all of the selected
mailboxes messages into a single PST. If not, is there a tool out there
that
will let you do that after you run Exmerge. I have looked hard and
couldn't
find anything in the latest Exmerge version's document.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need ammo
What was the size limit on the individual mailboxes? -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo We have one customer with a 100MB SMTP limit which they say needed for some large CAD engineering drawings they were sending. One of these got caught in an email loop and generated so many transaction log files that it killed the server. We spent the good portion of a day recovering from that disaster. Most of our customers have reasonable limits 10-15MB. Have them use Winzip. It will save them time and you headaches. Just tell them the story above and imagine what their CEO would say if he/she finds out it was them who caused him/her a delay in getting the CEO's email sent. They might find themselves on the unemployment line like the guy above did. Nate -- From: Andrey Fyodorov Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2002 16:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need ammo
Prior to this incident it was 200MB. After the incident we set the following IW - 40MB PS - 50MB PSR - 200MB Note: We had informed the customer of these issues prior to the incident with their server. It was only after the crash that they believed us. -- From: Andy David Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 6, 2002 07:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: need ammo What was the size limit on the individual mailboxes? -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo We have one customer with a 100MB SMTP limit which they say needed for some large CAD engineering drawings they were sending. One of these got caught in an email loop and generated so many transaction log files that it killed the server. We spent the good portion of a day recovering from that disaster. Most of our customers have reasonable limits 10-15MB. Have them use Winzip. It will save them time and you headaches. Just tell them the story above and imagine what their CEO would say if he/she finds out it was them who caused him/her a delay in getting the CEO's email sent. They might find themselves on the unemployment line like the guy above did. Nate -- From: Andrey Fyodorov Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2002 16:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
delivery receipt
Exchange 2000 Server SP3 Native Mode Windows 2000 Server SP3 When an user sends a message with the Request a delivery receipt for all messages I send flag activated, he receives a delivery receipt confirmation with my name (I'm the administrator of Exchange). Is it possible to change it, to, for example, service notification or similar? Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: delivery receipt
I know you can change this in exchange 5.5 under Internet mail service properties but you would probably have to make a mailbox with the desired diplay name. RGDS Rich -Original Message- From: Cabezas, Manuel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: delivery receipt Exchange 2000 Server SP3 Native Mode Windows 2000 Server SP3 When an user sends a message with the Request a delivery receipt for all messages I send flag activated, he receives a delivery receipt confirmation with my name (I'm the administrator of Exchange). Is it possible to change it, to, for example, service notification or similar? Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K: OUTLOOK Can't open this item SP3 bug?
try to jiggle it by moving the user's mailbox from one information store to another or from one server to another also try exporting the mailbox to a PST file with Outlook, deleting the mailbox, then importing back try same with ExMerge Andrey Fyodorov founder of the Scientific Jiggle Method :) Applied Jiggle Technologies :) -Original Message- From: MS Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 6:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K: OUTLOOK Can't open this item SP3 bug? OS: Win2K, SP2, IIS Roll-up, (+most Critical Windows Update published hotfixes) E2K: Native, SP3, Trend 6.0 Scanmail Single Native Domain, Single Exchange Server, 1 SG, 4 Mailbox DBs, 1 PF DB Hello, Not sure if this is a new bug introduced with E2K SP3, or just my bad luck with E2K. Some users are unable to open/delete/move/reply/forward... some Messages with OUTLOOK (various versions) or E2K OWA. The error they get in OUTLOOK is: Can't open this item On the Server side an error is logged in the App log: === Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: Content Engine Event ID: 12002 Date: 9/4/2002 Time: 1:38:05 PM User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE Description: Error 8004011B-8000 occurred while processing message from 'SearchStorage.com'. === Combing through the App log it looks like we've got at least 9 different Messages with this problem. I CAN access them with an IMAP client, view it, and delete it. It is then deleted on the Server side mailbox. Since this problem started I have run ISINTEG against all databases, and even compacted the databases (ya, ya, I know, but it is documented a compact will get rid of various DB problems Q314917, Q195856, and I had an Open maintenance window). This did not get rid of the problem, and a user has gotten a new message since then with this problem. The problem messages I have looked at are of type Content-Type: multipart/alternative and contain both a text/plain and text/html versions of the email. Guessing a content conversion problem with MAPI and SP3 ... but haven't heard anyone else complain of something similar. I have looked at Q232323 and Q296598, but they didn't seem to apply. Anyone else seeing this with SP3? Thanks, Brent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need ammo
My guess would be forwarding. Another evil feature that many of my customers insist on having. Then when the server crawls they all complain and blame me, my company, Exchange, Microsoft, Bill Gates, etc. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 8:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo What caused the mail loop? -Original Message- From: Darryl Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 8:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo The general policy of most companies is 5MB limit of Internet inbound/Outbound messages. In my opinion, too many users think of email systems as being some panacean highway for any kind of data transmission no matter the threat or inconvenience to others. I have had nitwits send out large messages which got caught in a nasty mail loop. There is no easy answer but I recommend that you approach this from a policy point of view. Our policy here is 5MB. No ifs or butts (pun intended). D. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Domain Transition
Hello. Recently I had to add another email domain to my exchange in = order to receive email from our new domain that reflects our recent name = change. I have the Recipient policy set up to recie4ve email from both the new = and old domains. What I would like to know is if there is a way I can have exchange auto reply to any email sent to the old domain with a message stating that we have changed our email etc Thanks Will _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need ammo
You'll find that with large messages of that size, you may be fielding calls from remote users who can't understand why, when they dial in, their email takes a couple hours to download. Explaining to them that they have several large attachments waiting for them usually sufficiently frustrates them into seeing your point of view (provided you only provide dial-up services for remote users). Its all a matter of user training. Typical users don't have any clue that there's a better way to transfer files, not only externally, but internally. Once you explain FTP, or even file shares, to them, it usually helps the problem. If you don't happen to be using Enterprise version, and you have a bunch of packrats, you may find that with larger attachment sizes, you'll fill up your IS rather quickly - happened to us with only a couple hundred users. Convincing people not to send email is much easier than convicing them to delete email already sent. John J. Steniger Network and Security Manager Familymeds, Inc. Phone: 860-676-1222 X633 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.familymeds.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 5:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Site Connector
I'm replacing one of my Exchange 5.5 smtp servers in the next couple of weeks. This server is also running a Site Connector which is used by our Tokyo branch. We will be replacing it with an Windows 2000 box runninng Exchange 5.5. Is there any documentation or suggestions on the best way to do this? Thanks. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need ammo
I totally agree here. We told them sneding large files via FTP would be far better. -- From: Great Cthulhu Jones Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, September 6, 2002 07:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo Another alternative: educate people about FTP. You know, the *other* Transfer Protocol. SMTP is for simple messages. FTP is for files. There ya go. Tell 'em CJ sent ya. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Couch, Nate Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo We have one customer with a 100MB SMTP limit which they say needed for some large CAD engineering drawings they were sending. One of these got caught in an email loop and generated so many transaction log files that it killed the server. We spent the good portion of a day recovering from that disaster. Most of our customers have reasonable limits 10-15MB. Have them use Winzip. It will save them time and you headaches. Just tell them the story above and imagine what their CEO would say if he/she finds out it was them who caused him/her a delay in getting the CEO's email sent. They might find themselves on the unemployment line like the guy above did. Nate -- From: Andrey Fyodorov Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2002 16:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need ammo
Customer ::blank stare:: /Customer -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 6:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo I totally agree here. We told them sneding large files via FTP would be far better. -- From: Great Cthulhu Jones Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, September 6, 2002 07:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo Another alternative: educate people about FTP. You know, the *other* Transfer Protocol. SMTP is for simple messages. FTP is for files. There ya go. Tell 'em CJ sent ya. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Couch, Nate Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo We have one customer with a 100MB SMTP limit which they say needed for some large CAD engineering drawings they were sending. One of these got caught in an email loop and generated so many transaction log files that it killed the server. We spent the good portion of a day recovering from that disaster. Most of our customers have reasonable limits 10-15MB. Have them use Winzip. It will save them time and you headaches. Just tell them the story above and imagine what their CEO would say if he/she finds out it was them who caused him/her a delay in getting the CEO's email sent. They might find themselves on the unemployment line like the guy above did. Nate -- From: Andrey Fyodorov Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2002 16:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Delete
Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMC Logging Levels?
Hi All, I am trying to find some kind of documentation on the different levels of logging in the 'diagnostics logging' tab of the IMC (Exchange 5.5). I am trying to find out what is logged at the different levels for all the categories. (Initialization/Termination, Addressing, Message Transfer, SMTP Interface Events, Internal Processing, SMTP Protocol Log, and Message Archival) Thanks in advance! Joe Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Delete
Do your have the Don't Delete Until Backup option selected in the information store? Will -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Delete
Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank space (white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available for use. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Delete
no it is not selected, if i select this will it delete all the space that i previous deleted after the backup tonight. -Original Message- From: Will Pawlikowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Do your have the Don't Delete Until Backup option selected in the information store? Will -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need ammo
My opinion would be it depends IF it is say a graphics design firm...then 10MB could likely not be big enough...or maybe and engineering design firm use Acad..etc...large files I do not know that there is a hard fast rule on this..it depends on your environment, bandwidth connections etc... limits can be good and can kind'a help as a safety net..kind'a but then they can be a big pain too I do not believe it should crash your server...maybe slow down the transfer of mail thru the IMC in exch...due to all the processing..but not crashIt could appear as crashing maybe depending on your hardware...bandwidth..etc... I set mine at 15mb...but then I do not have graphic designers to deal with just sales people sending PPT, PDF, XLS...large at times say close on some XLS to 10MBand often the sales people will send a 4MB PPT to like 30 to 60 people...but the server just run's and sends them as it can...no crashing.. Ive also got a full T1 so generally bandwidth is not an issue..Exch55sp4, NT4sp6a..Pent 3 600..768MB ram... the customer is always right.well kind'a. If they want a higher limits and need it then likely they should get it...if it's crashing (truely) your server...I would say something is amiss it your server,config's or something and it should be fixed/looked at 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 5:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Delete
Ronald, Do you ever do a offline defrag and if I do it is there any potential problems that can occur during the process. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank space (white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available for use. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Delete
What about retension? I thought when u delete mail, it will still remain according to your settings. Here for instance we have 7 days, so we can retrieve deleted items. -- From: Tener, Richard[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 06 September 2002 14:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Ronald, Do you ever do a offline defrag and if I do it is there any potential problems that can occur during the process. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank space (white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available for use. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Delete
no we dont use retension. Thanks -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete What about retension? I thought when u delete mail, it will still remain according to your settings. Here for instance we have 7 days, so we can retrieve deleted items. -- From: Tener, Richard[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 06 September 2002 14:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Ronald, Do you ever do a offline defrag and if I do it is there any potential problems that can occur during the process. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank space (white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available for use. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Delete
Thus, if u check your server properties, highlight server, then expand to the private store, then select properties, your retension time should be shown. David What about retension? I thought when u delete mail, it will still remain according to your settings. Here for instance we have 7 days, so we can retrieve deleted items. -- From: Tener, Richard[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 06 September 2002 14:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Exchange Delete Ronald, Do you ever do a offline defrag and if I do it is there any potential problems that can occur during the process. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank space (white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available for use. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Delete
Then guess a defrag would be your way forward, or a move of one of the stores somewhere else. Unless u wait until an online defrag runs...to see if that makes any kind of impact. David -- From: Tener, Richard[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 06 September 2002 14:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete no we dont use retension. Thanks -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete What about retension? I thought when u delete mail, it will still remain according to your settings. Here for instance we have 7 days, so we can retrieve deleted items. -- From: Tener, Richard[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 06 September 2002 14:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Exchange Delete Ronald, Do you ever do a offline defrag and if I do it is there any potential problems that can occur during the process. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank space (white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available for use. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _
RE: need ammo
Heh. Sneding. I would also suggest considering setting the send limit (either global in ex2k or mailbox level ex 5.5) to whatever your IMC limit is. We had some [user] try to send a 285MB attachment, and it bounced around the MTA's for a while before I found it and deleted it. We have a 4MB limit on the IMC, and most recently put a 4MB limit *everywhere* (MTA, 5.5 UA, 2k Global). There really haven't been very many complaints. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:15 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: need ammo Subject: RE: need ammo Customer ::blank stare:: /Customer -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 6:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo I totally agree here. We told them sneding large files via FTP would be far better. -- From: Great Cthulhu Jones Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, September 6, 2002 07:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo Another alternative: educate people about FTP. You know, the *other* Transfer Protocol. SMTP is for simple messages. FTP is for files. There ya go. Tell 'em CJ sent ya. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Couch, Nate Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo We have one customer with a 100MB SMTP limit which they say needed for some large CAD engineering drawings they were sending. One of these got caught in an email loop and generated so many transaction log files that it killed the server. We spent the good portion of a day recovering from that disaster. Most of our customers have reasonable limits 10-15MB. Have them use Winzip. It will save them time and you headaches. Just tell them the story above and imagine what their CEO would say if he/she finds out it was them who caused him/her a delay in getting the CEO's email sent. They might find themselves on the unemployment line like the guy above did. Nate -- From: Andrey Fyodorov Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2002 16:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Delete
Rich, I've done quite a few under ex.5.5. - The only problem is time. Depending on how fast your server and network are will tell how long it will take. 12 gig database will run close to 2 gig per hr. Also, you'd need temp space of atleast 12 gig during the process as it copies and rewrites the info stor. Under Diaster Recovery Q article it will walk you thru using the offline defrag tool under eseutil isinteg. The online defrag that generally runs every evening will only get back space from your deleted items folders after they expire. In my case I have it set to 30 days before removing them from the server. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Ronald, Do you ever do a offline defrag and if I do it is there any potential problems that can occur during the process. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank space (white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available for use. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Delete
Keep in mind that when you look in the Event Viewer, if the online defrag does not show an enormous amount of space regained (10GB+), I would not even do the offline defrag. Most of the time EV comes back with only MB of space recoverable. I think it is only feasible when you can reclaim a LARGE amount of disk space. The time and resources have to be taken into account also. Geoff... -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Then guess a defrag would be your way forward, or a move of one of the stores somewhere else. Unless u wait until an online defrag runs...to see if that makes any kind of impact. David -- From: Tener, Richard[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 06 September 2002 14:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete no we dont use retension. Thanks -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete What about retension? I thought when u delete mail, it will still remain according to your settings. Here for instance we have 7 days, so we can retrieve deleted items. -- From: Tener, Richard[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 06 September 2002 14:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Exchange Delete Ronald, Do you ever do a offline defrag and if I do it is there any potential problems that can occur during the process. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank space (white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available for use. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: Exchange Delete
You need at least 110% the size of your priv.edb file in order to do the offline defrag. One good (bad?) thing is you can redirect it to another server/workstation if you want to through the switches. I have done many with 5.5 and our timeframe is the Servers go offline at 8:00 p.m. EST (to give the West time to finish business), and are not available until 6:00 a.m., Monday morning. Believe me, sometimes you need all that time. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Rich, I've done quite a few under ex.5.5. - The only problem is time. Depending on how fast your server and network are will tell how long it will take. 12 gig database will run close to 2 gig per hr. Also, you'd need temp space of atleast 12 gig during the process as it copies and rewrites the info stor. Under Diaster Recovery Q article it will walk you thru using the offline defrag tool under eseutil isinteg. The online defrag that generally runs every evening will only get back space from your deleted items folders after they expire. In my case I have it set to 30 days before removing them from the server. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Ronald, Do you ever do a offline defrag and if I do it is there any potential problems that can occur during the process. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank space (white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available for use. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge
Fellow Admins. Is there away to run exmerge and put all of the selected mailboxes messages into a single PST. If not, is there a tool out there that will let you do that after you run Exmerge. I have looked hard and couldn't find anything in the latest Exmerge version's document. I'd advise against this course of action. .pst files have an upper limit of 2Gb and tend to be less efficient and stable than Exchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Delete
Oucch, Thanks for the info guys, by the way the online backup is freeing up about 72mb 2-3 times a day. RGDS Rich -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete You need at least 110% the size of your priv.edb file in order to do the offline defrag. One good (bad?) thing is you can redirect it to another server/workstation if you want to through the switches. I have done many with 5.5 and our timeframe is the Servers go offline at 8:00 p.m. EST (to give the West time to finish business), and are not available until 6:00 a.m., Monday morning. Believe me, sometimes you need all that time. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Rich, I've done quite a few under ex.5.5. - The only problem is time. Depending on how fast your server and network are will tell how long it will take. 12 gig database will run close to 2 gig per hr. Also, you'd need temp space of atleast 12 gig during the process as it copies and rewrites the info stor. Under Diaster Recovery Q article it will walk you thru using the offline defrag tool under eseutil isinteg. The online defrag that generally runs every evening will only get back space from your deleted items folders after they expire. In my case I have it set to 30 days before removing them from the server. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Ronald, Do you ever do a offline defrag and if I do it is there any potential problems that can occur during the process. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank space (white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available for use. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Delete
Sorry! Meant to say 8:00 p.m. EST, Friday night through 6:00 a.m. EST, Monday morning. If you meant your online defrag is only showing 72MB that will be freed, then FAI. It would take too much time and resources to do it. Just my .02¢ Geoff... -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Oucch, Thanks for the info guys, by the way the online backup is freeing up about 72mb 2-3 times a day. RGDS Rich -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete You need at least 110% the size of your priv.edb file in order to do the offline defrag. One good (bad?) thing is you can redirect it to another server/workstation if you want to through the switches. I have done many with 5.5 and our timeframe is the Servers go offline at 8:00 p.m. EST (to give the West time to finish business), and are not available until 6:00 a.m., Monday morning. Believe me, sometimes you need all that time. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Rich, I've done quite a few under ex.5.5. - The only problem is time. Depending on how fast your server and network are will tell how long it will take. 12 gig database will run close to 2 gig per hr. Also, you'd need temp space of atleast 12 gig during the process as it copies and rewrites the info stor. Under Diaster Recovery Q article it will walk you thru using the offline defrag tool under eseutil isinteg. The online defrag that generally runs every evening will only get back space from your deleted items folders after they expire. In my case I have it set to 30 days before removing them from the server. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Ronald, Do you ever do a offline defrag and if I do it is there any potential problems that can occur during the process. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank space (white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available for use. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Site Connector
If you have others available, choose a different server (re-home it). -Original Message- From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:01 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Site Connector Subject: Site Connector I'm replacing one of my Exchange 5.5 smtp servers in the next couple of weeks. This server is also running a Site Connector which is used by our Tokyo branch. We will be replacing it with an Windows 2000 box runninng Exchange 5.5. Is there any documentation or suggestions on the best way to do this? Thanks. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000
What if I just remove the SMTP Address Space, recalculate routing on the ex5.5 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Yes but if you don't cost it out first, it will still be using it when you remove it (i.e. if you have high volume, this can lead to stranded/lost mail). -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 7:28 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 So what you are saying is to make the ex5.5 a cost of 2. The default cost in ex2000 is 1. Therefore it will use ex2000 for all outbound traffic? What will happen when I remove the IMS on Ex5.5? Will it automatically recalc the routing to the ex2000 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Did you change the cost on the 5.5 one? If they're all cost 1, then mail will continue to follow the route it knows. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:38 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Running Exchange in mixed mode, with final exchange 5.5 server ready to be removed. I have changed the site addressing to my new ex2000 server and recalculated routing, but, noticed that email is still going out via the IMS on the Ex5.5 server. Inbound mail comes in OK, just outgoing email goes out via the Ex5.5 IMS. I've stopped the services - but - guess that I actually need to remove the IMS from the ex5.5 server in-order to get mail routed outbound via ex2000. Do I need to setup a new smtp connector in ex2000 or is this automatic after I removed the ex5.5 IMS? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
filtering e-mail
Exchange5.5 WinNT4 sp6 Inoculate IT I know this have been posted before but can someone recommend what software I can use to filter Spam e-mail. How does other company filter e-mail base on the header, body text, or words. Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Delete
If you only have 72MB free, then that is all you will gain by an offline defrag. 1. Increase the size of the drive it's on. 2. Decrease the amount of mail your users have (lower mailbox limits). 3. Install a second server and split your users in half. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:12 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Exchange Delete Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Sorry! Meant to say 8:00 p.m. EST, Friday night through 6:00 a.m. EST, Monday morning. If you meant your online defrag is only showing 72MB that will be freed, then FAI. It would take too much time and resources to do it. Just my .02¢ Geoff... -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Oucch, Thanks for the info guys, by the way the online backup is freeing up about 72mb 2-3 times a day. RGDS Rich -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete You need at least 110% the size of your priv.edb file in order to do the offline defrag. One good (bad?) thing is you can redirect it to another server/workstation if you want to through the switches. I have done many with 5.5 and our timeframe is the Servers go offline at 8:00 p.m. EST (to give the West time to finish business), and are not available until 6:00 a.m., Monday morning. Believe me, sometimes you need all that time. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Rich, I've done quite a few under ex.5.5. - The only problem is time. Depending on how fast your server and network are will tell how long it will take. 12 gig database will run close to 2 gig per hr. Also, you'd need temp space of atleast 12 gig during the process as it copies and rewrites the info stor. Under Diaster Recovery Q article it will walk you thru using the offline defrag tool under eseutil isinteg. The online defrag that generally runs every evening will only get back space from your deleted items folders after they expire. In my case I have it set to 30 days before removing them from the server. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Ronald, Do you ever do a offline defrag and if I do it is there any potential problems that can occur during the process. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank space (white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available for use. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
Re: filtering e-mail
Before? It's posted daily. - Original Message - From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:35 AM Subject: filtering e-mail Exchange5.5 WinNT4 sp6 Inoculate IT I know this have been posted before but can someone recommend what software I can use to filter Spam e-mail. How does other company filter e-mail base on the header, body text, or words. Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Delete
The white space will be available after an online defrag is run, it simply won't show up as space on the disk itself. - Original Message - From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank space (white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available for use. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: filtering e-mail
Actually at this point a form could be made for this answer. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: filtering e-mail Before? It's posted daily. - Original Message - From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:35 AM Subject: filtering e-mail Exchange5.5 WinNT4 sp6 Inoculate IT I know this have been posted before but can someone recommend what software I can use to filter Spam e-mail. How does other company filter e-mail base on the header, body text, or words. Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: filtering e-mail
I think that the FAQ might just cover this one... :) - Original Message - From: Mellott, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:48 AM Subject: RE: filtering e-mail Actually at this point a form could be made for this answer. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: filtering e-mail Before? It's posted daily. - Original Message - From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:35 AM Subject: filtering e-mail Exchange5.5 WinNT4 sp6 Inoculate IT I know this have been posted before but can someone recommend what software I can use to filter Spam e-mail. How does other company filter e-mail base on the header, body text, or words. Thank Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000
Are there any Q articles(other than Q316886) pertaining to this some one can point me to? I am just about ready to route my internet mail through the exchange 2000 server. Thanks and happy Friday. Raj -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 What if I just remove the SMTP Address Space, recalculate routing on the ex5.5 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Yes but if you don't cost it out first, it will still be using it when you remove it (i.e. if you have high volume, this can lead to stranded/lost mail). -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 7:28 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 So what you are saying is to make the ex5.5 a cost of 2. The default cost in ex2000 is 1. Therefore it will use ex2000 for all outbound traffic? What will happen when I remove the IMS on Ex5.5? Will it automatically recalc the routing to the ex2000 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Did you change the cost on the 5.5 one? If they're all cost 1, then mail will continue to follow the route it knows. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:38 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Running Exchange in mixed mode, with final exchange 5.5 server ready to be removed. I have changed the site addressing to my new ex2000 server and recalculated routing, but, noticed that email is still going out via the IMS on the Ex5.5 server. Inbound mail comes in OK, just outgoing email goes out via the Ex5.5 IMS. I've stopped the services - but - guess that I actually need to remove the IMS from the ex5.5 server in-order to get mail routed outbound via ex2000. Do I need to setup a new smtp connector in ex2000 or is this automatic after I removed the ex5.5 IMS? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000
Last modified version is 5/31/2002 -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Are there any Q articles(other than Q316886) pertaining to this some one can point me to? I am just about ready to route my internet mail through the exchange 2000 server. Thanks and happy Friday. Raj -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 What if I just remove the SMTP Address Space, recalculate routing on the ex5.5 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Yes but if you don't cost it out first, it will still be using it when you remove it (i.e. if you have high volume, this can lead to stranded/lost mail). -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 7:28 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 So what you are saying is to make the ex5.5 a cost of 2. The default cost in ex2000 is 1. Therefore it will use ex2000 for all outbound traffic? What will happen when I remove the IMS on Ex5.5? Will it automatically recalc the routing to the ex2000 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Did you change the cost on the 5.5 one? If they're all cost 1, then mail will continue to follow the route it knows. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:38 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Running Exchange in mixed mode, with final exchange 5.5 server ready to be removed. I have changed the site addressing to my new ex2000 server and recalculated routing, but, noticed that email is still going out via the IMS on the Ex5.5 server. Inbound mail comes in OK, just outgoing email goes out via the Ex5.5 IMS. I've stopped the services - but - guess that I actually need to remove the IMS from the ex5.5 server in-order to get mail routed outbound via ex2000. Do I need to setup a new smtp connector in ex2000 or is this automatic after I removed the ex5.5 IMS? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your
Public Folders
Here's a nasty one. Employing E2K turns on public folders. We had deliberately disallowed these under E5.5 and have just found that E2K re-allows them. Investigating further we found that the EVERYBODY group had been allowed to provide Create Public Folder and the box was greyed out. Anybody know a good way off keeping Public Folder permanently locked down (and hence under our control, not the users) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge
That's what I thought might be the driving force... One issue related to this strategy is that if messages were sent via Bcc or to a DL it might not be possible to determine from a single PST file which mailbox contained the data in question. I recently spent a boatload of time exploring similar restore scenarios... One relatively powerful and inexpensive[1] option to consider is using kvault for this task. [1] Inexpensive compared to the labor and time costs I estimated for the methodology you are currently employing. It also positions you well for future discovery. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 5:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge Well I am doing a very large restore of emails that go back two years. I extracted all the messages that have certain words in the subject. Easy enough. But the lawyers would like to know if we could put all the extracted messages in one pst for each monthly restore. There are about 7 servers and with two years of data that is alot of PST's. What they would want is one PST for each monthly restore for each server. Does that make sense. I told them it may not be possible. So there you have it. They either open dozens of PST's that have the subject data or one PST for each month. What a mess but it beats unemployment. Anyhow I am using Backup Exec and Tivoli and most any combo of Exchange 5.5 running on 2000 or NT4.0 you can think of. Plus we are installing new servers and migrating to E2K. One thing is I will cringe if anybody asks me if I ever did any disaster recovery work. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 11:57 AM Subject: RE: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge No, there's an option to do the opposite though. Given the limits of PST files re: size and number of messages per folder the number of scenarios where that'd be useful seem somewhat limited. What is it you are trying to achieve? -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge Fellow Admins. Is there away to run exmerge and put all of the selected mailboxes messages into a single PST. If not, is there a tool out there that will let you do that after you run Exmerge. I have looked hard and couldn't find anything in the latest Exmerge version's document. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders
Why? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Busby, Jacob Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders Here's a nasty one. Employing E2K turns on public folders. We had deliberately disallowed these under E5.5 and have just found that E2K re-allows them. Investigating further we found that the EVERYBODY group had been allowed to provide Create Public Folder and the box was greyed out. Anybody know a good way off keeping Public Folder permanently locked down (and hence under our control, not the users) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public Folders
You mean like disabling the creation of top-level public folders? Look at: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q256131 Neil - Original Message - From: Busby, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:33 PM Subject: Public Folders Here's a nasty one. Employing E2K turns on public folders. We had deliberately disallowed these under E5.5 and have just found that E2K re-allows them. Investigating further we found that the EVERYBODY group had been allowed to provide Create Public Folder and the box was greyed out. Anybody know a good way off keeping Public Folder permanently locked down (and hence under our control, not the users) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public Folders
You need to lock down top-level PF creation. Q256131 - Original Message - From: Busby, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:33 AM Subject: Public Folders Here's a nasty one. Employing E2K turns on public folders. We had deliberately disallowed these under E5.5 and have just found that E2K re-allows them. Investigating further we found that the EVERYBODY group had been allowed to provide Create Public Folder and the box was greyed out. Anybody know a good way off keeping Public Folder permanently locked down (and hence under our control, not the users) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need ammo
A quick check of 10 or so companies ESMTP compliant mail servers didn't bear out the assertion that most companies have a limit of 5MB on the IMS. Has someone actually done a more comprehensive survey of IMS limits or was the 5MB number an off the cuff statistic? -Original Message- From: Darryl Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo The general policy of most companies is 5MB limit of Internet inbound/Outbound messages. In my opinion, too many users think of email systems as being some panacean highway for any kind of data transmission no matter the threat or inconvenience to others. I have had nitwits send out large messages which got caught in a nasty mail loop. There is no easy answer but I recommend that you approach this from a policy point of view. Our policy here is 5MB. No ifs or butts (pun intended). D. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Communication
Too little information to provide a consise answer. Sorry. -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Communication Okay, I am getting knee deep into a conversion from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000. Now we have an NT 4 Domain with two Exchange 5.5 Servers. We are creating a 2000 Domain that is going to house our new Exchange 2000 Servers. Now we are going to migrate with a test group to make sure everything is going smoothly. What would be the best scenerio to have these servers communicate with each other, that causes the least amount of network traffic. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Delete
Right, wouldn't want to follow any of those best practices in the FAQ. The answer to this particular question is detailed extensively in the archives. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete no we dont use retension. Thanks -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete What about retension? I thought when u delete mail, it will still remain according to your settings. Here for instance we have 7 days, so we can retrieve deleted items. -- From: Tener, Richard[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 06 September 2002 14:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Exchange Delete Ronald, Do you ever do a offline defrag and if I do it is there any potential problems that can occur during the process. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Delete Whenever you delete users and mailbox's the database is left with blank space (white space) throughout the Information Store. Only way to recoup the space is to run an offline defrag, this will make the white space available for use. Ron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Delete Hello, I have exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Nt 4.0 and I am getting close to running out of room on the second partition where my information store is located. The second partition is 12 gigs in size and there is only 2gig left until it is all used up. My information store is 8.5 gigs and I figured if I get some people to delete email that it would reduce the size on the second partition. The weird thing is that when I delete about 200,000 kb in a inbox I go back to the partition I see no change in size. Does anyone know how exchange uses space, or is there any documentation about this. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need ammo
IIRC, the 5MB limit comes from some Microsoft article I remember reading a long time ago. It could go back as far as Microsoft Mail 3.5. However, I have only heard discussion in various Exchange groups, that 5-10MB seems to be the limit (with exceptions, of course). Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo A quick check of 10 or so companies ESMTP compliant mail servers didn't bear out the assertion that most companies have a limit of 5MB on the IMS. Has someone actually done a more comprehensive survey of IMS limits or was the 5MB number an off the cuff statistic? -Original Message- From: Darryl Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo The general policy of most companies is 5MB limit of Internet inbound/Outbound messages. In my opinion, too many users think of email systems as being some panacean highway for any kind of data transmission no matter the threat or inconvenience to others. I have had nitwits send out large messages which got caught in a nasty mail loop. There is no easy answer but I recommend that you approach this from a policy point of view. Our policy here is 5MB. No ifs or butts (pun intended). D. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: need ammo
5Mb was quite large in MSMail days! :-) Looks rather small these days, IMHO. Neil - Original Message - From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: RE: need ammo IIRC, the 5MB limit comes from some Microsoft article I remember reading a long time ago. It could go back as far as Microsoft Mail 3.5. However, I have only heard discussion in various Exchange groups, that 5-10MB seems to be the limit (with exceptions, of course). Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo A quick check of 10 or so companies ESMTP compliant mail servers didn't bear out the assertion that most companies have a limit of 5MB on the IMS. Has someone actually done a more comprehensive survey of IMS limits or was the 5MB number an off the cuff statistic? -Original Message- From: Darryl Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo The general policy of most companies is 5MB limit of Internet inbound/Outbound messages. In my opinion, too many users think of email systems as being some panacean highway for any kind of data transmission no matter the threat or inconvenience to others. I have had nitwits send out large messages which got caught in a nasty mail loop. There is no easy answer but I recommend that you approach this from a policy point of view. Our policy here is 5MB. No ifs or butts (pun intended). D. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000
Thanks -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Last modified version is 5/31/2002 -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Are there any Q articles(other than Q316886) pertaining to this some one can point me to? I am just about ready to route my internet mail through the exchange 2000 server. Thanks and happy Friday. Raj -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 What if I just remove the SMTP Address Space, recalculate routing on the ex5.5 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Yes but if you don't cost it out first, it will still be using it when you remove it (i.e. if you have high volume, this can lead to stranded/lost mail). -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 7:28 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 So what you are saying is to make the ex5.5 a cost of 2. The default cost in ex2000 is 1. Therefore it will use ex2000 for all outbound traffic? What will happen when I remove the IMS on Ex5.5? Will it automatically recalc the routing to the ex2000 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Did you change the cost on the 5.5 one? If they're all cost 1, then mail will continue to follow the route it knows. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:38 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Running Exchange in mixed mode, with final exchange 5.5 server ready to be removed. I have changed the site addressing to my new ex2000 server and recalculated routing, but, noticed that email is still going out via the IMS on the Ex5.5 server. Inbound mail comes in OK, just outgoing email goes out via the Ex5.5 IMS. I've stopped the services - but - guess that I actually need to remove the IMS from the ex5.5 server in-order to get mail routed outbound via ex2000. Do I need to setup a new smtp connector in ex2000 or is this automatic after I removed the ex5.5 IMS? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this
RE: need ammo
At my last gig we routinely received e-mail messages which were 200MB+. 5-10MB limits would have been laughed at. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo IIRC, the 5MB limit comes from some Microsoft article I remember reading a long time ago. It could go back as far as Microsoft Mail 3.5. However, I have only heard discussion in various Exchange groups, that 5-10MB seems to be the limit (with exceptions, of course). Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo A quick check of 10 or so companies ESMTP compliant mail servers didn't bear out the assertion that most companies have a limit of 5MB on the IMS. Has someone actually done a more comprehensive survey of IMS limits or was the 5MB number an off the cuff statistic? -Original Message- From: Darryl Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo The general policy of most companies is 5MB limit of Internet inbound/Outbound messages. In my opinion, too many users think of email systems as being some panacean highway for any kind of data transmission no matter the threat or inconvenience to others. I have had nitwits send out large messages which got caught in a nasty mail loop. There is no easy answer but I recommend that you approach this from a policy point of view. Our policy here is 5MB. No ifs or butts (pun intended). D. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need ammo
I guess the best answer would be business-related. What is the standard size of attachments that are sent to a company? I would say that if your company were an advertising agency, then you would need larger limits, due to the graphic file, etc. If your company was a law firm, you would need even larger limits. But if your company only exchanges emails messages and rarely sends back and forth attachments, the default could be no limit. As I said at the beginning -- it is all related to the type of business, IMHO. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo At my last gig we routinely received e-mail messages which were 200MB+. 5-10MB limits would have been laughed at. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo IIRC, the 5MB limit comes from some Microsoft article I remember reading a long time ago. It could go back as far as Microsoft Mail 3.5. However, I have only heard discussion in various Exchange groups, that 5-10MB seems to be the limit (with exceptions, of course). Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo A quick check of 10 or so companies ESMTP compliant mail servers didn't bear out the assertion that most companies have a limit of 5MB on the IMS. Has someone actually done a more comprehensive survey of IMS limits or was the 5MB number an off the cuff statistic? -Original Message- From: Darryl Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo The general policy of most companies is 5MB limit of Internet inbound/Outbound messages. In my opinion, too many users think of email systems as being some panacean highway for any kind of data transmission no matter the threat or inconvenience to others. I have had nitwits send out large messages which got caught in a nasty mail loop. There is no easy answer but I recommend that you approach this from a policy point of view. Our policy here is 5MB. No ifs or butts (pun intended). D. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MX record question
HI If a DNS has 2 MX record, when exactly the 2nd (higher cost) one will be used ? When the first one do not respond to a SMTP session or when the 1st one does not existe (respond to a ping request ) Basically I'm moving my customer mail to a new ADSL link, and I was wondering if today I ask the DNSMaster to put a new mx record (lower cost) for the new IP link, will; this cause a problem because that new IP address respond (some kind of router / firewall doing Nat) but there is not server yet behind the router. I will install tomorrow the mail server begind that link, but was concerned about the actual NAT Public Address responding JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need ammo
Yeah, which makes it difficult in the case of a hosting company where multiple customers have different business needs. Might be an area in which a 3rd party content filtering gateway with the capacity to delay the delivery of oversized messages could add value. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo I guess the best answer would be business-related. What is the standard size of attachments that are sent to a company? I would say that if your company were an advertising agency, then you would need larger limits, due to the graphic file, etc. If your company was a law firm, you would need even larger limits. But if your company only exchanges emails messages and rarely sends back and forth attachments, the default could be no limit. As I said at the beginning -- it is all related to the type of business, IMHO. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo At my last gig we routinely received e-mail messages which were 200MB+. 5-10MB limits would have been laughed at. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo IIRC, the 5MB limit comes from some Microsoft article I remember reading a long time ago. It could go back as far as Microsoft Mail 3.5. However, I have only heard discussion in various Exchange groups, that 5-10MB seems to be the limit (with exceptions, of course). Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo A quick check of 10 or so companies ESMTP compliant mail servers didn't bear out the assertion that most companies have a limit of 5MB on the IMS. Has someone actually done a more comprehensive survey of IMS limits or was the 5MB number an off the cuff statistic? -Original Message- From: Darryl Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo The general policy of most companies is 5MB limit of Internet inbound/Outbound messages. In my opinion, too many users think of email systems as being some panacean highway for any kind of data transmission no matter the threat or inconvenience to others. I have had nitwits send out large messages which got caught in a nasty mail loop. There is no easy answer but I recommend that you approach this from a policy point of view. Our policy here is 5MB. No ifs or butts (pun intended). D. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook/Citrix/offline storage
Does anyone know a workaround to Q242195? Windows 2000 Terminal Services Does Not Support Outlook Offline Storage http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q242195 Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge
Thanks. One thing about this company Bosch. They probably are the largest all MS Exchange Email setup world wide. Somewhere in the range of 200K users, 50+ sites and about 200+ email servers in about 43 countries. Talk about seeing it all. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge That's what I thought might be the driving force... One issue related to this strategy is that if messages were sent via Bcc or to a DL it might not be possible to determine from a single PST file which mailbox contained the data in question. I recently spent a boatload of time exploring similar restore scenarios... One relatively powerful and inexpensive[1] option to consider is using kvault for this task. [1] Inexpensive compared to the labor and time costs I estimated for the methodology you are currently employing. It also positions you well for future discovery. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 5:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge Well I am doing a very large restore of emails that go back two years. I extracted all the messages that have certain words in the subject. Easy enough. But the lawyers would like to know if we could put all the extracted messages in one pst for each monthly restore. There are about 7 servers and with two years of data that is alot of PST's. What they would want is one PST for each monthly restore for each server. Does that make sense. I told them it may not be possible. So there you have it. They either open dozens of PST's that have the subject data or one PST for each month. What a mess but it beats unemployment. Anyhow I am using Backup Exec and Tivoli and most any combo of Exchange 5.5 running on 2000 or NT4.0 you can think of. Plus we are installing new servers and migrating to E2K. One thing is I will cringe if anybody asks me if I ever did any disaster recovery work. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 11:57 AM Subject: RE: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge No, there's an option to do the opposite though. Given the limits of PST files re: size and number of messages per folder the number of scenarios where that'd be useful seem somewhat limited. What is it you are trying to achieve? -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge Fellow Admins. Is there away to run exmerge and put all of the selected mailboxes messages into a single PST. If not, is there a tool out there that will let you do that after you run Exmerge. I have looked hard and couldn't find anything in the latest Exmerge version's document. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Searching Exchange Database
Yes it is.. Go to suppport.micosoft.com and look for I love you in that virus Q you will find the directions and the tools. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McCready, Robert Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Searching Exchange Database Is there any way, to search the information store for a particular E-mail? Lets say that I wanted to search the entire server, looking for any E-mail that contained the word Threat in it. Is this possible? Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. It's a long shot, but I had to try. Thanks! Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Searching Exchange Database
Is there any way, to search the information store for a particular E-mail? Lets say that I wanted to search the entire server, looking for any E-mail that contained the word Threat in it. Is this possible? Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. It's a long shot, but I had to try. Thanks! Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Searching Exchange Database
You can search under subject and or attachment but not individual word in the body. No tool known of from MS unless you go a 3rd party or upgrade to Exchange 2000 and rollout full index searching. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Searching Exchange Database Is there any way, to search the information store for a particular E-mail? Lets say that I wanted to search the entire server, looking for any E-mail that contained the word Threat in it. Is this possible? Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. It's a long shot, but I had to try. Thanks! Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage
I would like to be able to create an ost on a remote laptop that uses Citrix over the Internet. I would like to avoid having the user dialup and sync (higher cost and lower bandwidth). Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Why would you want an OST in a TS profile? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Does anyone know a workaround to Q242195? Windows 2000 Terminal Services Does Not Support Outlook Offline Storage http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q242195 Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage
Just leave the email on the server for the TS session.. You donÂ’t need a pst or Ost. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage I would like to be able to create an ost on a remote laptop that uses Citrix over the Internet. I would like to avoid having the user dialup and sync (higher cost and lower bandwidth). Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Why would you want an OST in a TS profile? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Does anyone know a workaround to Q242195? Windows 2000 Terminal Services Does Not Support Outlook Offline Storage http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q242195 Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage
Let me know if you hear anything about this. One of my users wants to do this too. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage I would like to be able to create an ost on a remote laptop that uses Citrix over the Internet. I would like to avoid having the user dialup and sync (higher cost and lower bandwidth). Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Why would you want an OST in a TS profile? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Does anyone know a workaround to Q242195? Windows 2000 Terminal Services Does Not Support Outlook Offline Storage http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q242195 Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage
They want to have a local OST, that is accessed from the server over a TS session over the internet? That does not sound possible at all. I access my outlook over a TS session. All of the email lives on the email server. I have a 4 gig email box. And have no speed problems at all. No PST no OST. I have no clue how or why you would try to stick an OST in the mix. I even TS my email from my local Desktop now. Why use my proc for Email when I can use someone else's. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Johnson, Richard (NY Int) Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Let me know if you hear anything about this. One of my users wants to do this too. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage I would like to be able to create an ost on a remote laptop that uses Citrix over the Internet. I would like to avoid having the user dialup and sync (higher cost and lower bandwidth). Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Why would you want an OST in a TS profile? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Does anyone know a workaround to Q242195? Windows 2000 Terminal Services Does Not Support Outlook Offline Storage http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q242195 Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage
Are you trying to create the OST file for when you don't have access to Citrix? Then the users laptop with Outlook would have access to the OST? Isn't there an issue when Outlook tries to access an OST that was created with a instance? Do you have your citrix drives remapped or is the remote user using the V: (C$) drive? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage They want to have a local OST, that is accessed from the server over a TS session over the internet? That does not sound possible at all. I access my outlook over a TS session. All of the email lives on the email server. I have a 4 gig email box. And have no speed problems at all. No PST no OST. I have no clue how or why you would try to stick an OST in the mix. I even TS my email from my local Desktop now. Why use my proc for Email when I can use someone else's. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Johnson, Richard (NY Int) Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Let me know if you hear anything about this. One of my users wants to do this too. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage I would like to be able to create an ost on a remote laptop that uses Citrix over the Internet. I would like to avoid having the user dialup and sync (higher cost and lower bandwidth). Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Why would you want an OST in a TS profile? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Does anyone know a workaround to Q242195? Windows 2000 Terminal Services Does Not Support Outlook Offline Storage http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q242195 Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage
Remember...with Citrix/TS you are running a remote session...nothing (to speak of) is taking place on the users machine running the ICA/TS clientexcept..for Video/Keyboard/Mouse, the local machine is basically a dumb terminal... SO to my knowledge there is no way to get the Outlook info from the Outlook Citrix/ts session to the immediate machine. i.e. no syncing.. OL does not Sync via drive mapping so...thus you can not sync OL to the local machine.. Ok you could kind'a cheat and do a PST..then copy the PST via the drive mapping...boy would that S#$K! To do the OL sync to the users local machine...VPN... bill -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage I would like to be able to create an ost on a remote laptop that uses Citrix over the Internet. I would like to avoid having the user dialup and sync (higher cost and lower bandwidth). Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Why would you want an OST in a TS profile? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Does anyone know a workaround to Q242195? Windows 2000 Terminal Services Does Not Support Outlook Offline Storage http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q242195 Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage
We have a lot of road warriors that want to write email, etc. while offline (in meetings, on an airplane, etc.) and synchronize with the home office when they're back in the hotel room. It's MUCH cheaper for them to use the Internet connection in the hotel room rather than dial up from Finland back to Texas. Not to mention MUCH faster. I'm would like to get the TS/Outlook2K to create an ost on their local drive that can be accessed by their local Outlook2K while offline. Thanks, Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage They want to have a local OST, that is accessed from the server over a TS session over the internet? That does not sound possible at all. I access my outlook over a TS session. All of the email lives on the email server. I have a 4 gig email box. And have no speed problems at all. No PST no OST. I have no clue how or why you would try to stick an OST in the mix. I even TS my email from my local Desktop now. Why use my proc for Email when I can use someone else's. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Johnson, Richard (NY Int) Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Let me know if you hear anything about this. One of my users wants to do this too. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage I would like to be able to create an ost on a remote laptop that uses Citrix over the Internet. I would like to avoid having the user dialup and sync (higher cost and lower bandwidth). Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Why would you want an OST in a TS profile? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Does anyone know a workaround to Q242195? Windows 2000 Terminal Services Does Not Support Outlook Offline Storage http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q242195 Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage
The server drives are re-mapped. TS users see their local drives as \\Client\c$, etc. Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Are you trying to create the OST file for when you don't have access to Citrix? Then the users laptop with Outlook would have access to the OST? Isn't there an issue when Outlook tries to access an OST that was created with a instance? Do you have your citrix drives remapped or is the remote user using the V: (C$) drive? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage They want to have a local OST, that is accessed from the server over a TS session over the internet? That does not sound possible at all. I access my outlook over a TS session. All of the email lives on the email server. I have a 4 gig email box. And have no speed problems at all. No PST no OST. I have no clue how or why you would try to stick an OST in the mix. I even TS my email from my local Desktop now. Why use my proc for Email when I can use someone else's. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Johnson, Richard (NY Int) Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Let me know if you hear anything about this. One of my users wants to do this too. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage I would like to be able to create an ost on a remote laptop that uses Citrix over the Internet. I would like to avoid having the user dialup and sync (higher cost and lower bandwidth). Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Why would you want an OST in a TS profile? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Does anyone know a workaround to Q242195? Windows 2000 Terminal Services Does Not Support Outlook Offline Storage http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q242195 Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage
That is a perfect scenario for using a VPN. Since you already have the Internet access, you are half way towards a VPN. Aaron -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage We have a lot of road warriors that want to write email, etc. while offline (in meetings, on an airplane, etc.) and synchronize with the home office when they're back in the hotel room. It's MUCH cheaper for them to use the Internet connection in the hotel room rather than dial up from Finland back to Texas. Not to mention MUCH faster. I'm would like to get the TS/Outlook2K to create an ost on their local drive that can be accessed by their local Outlook2K while offline. Thanks, Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage They want to have a local OST, that is accessed from the server over a TS session over the internet? That does not sound possible at all. I access my outlook over a TS session. All of the email lives on the email server. I have a 4 gig email box. And have no speed problems at all. No PST no OST. I have no clue how or why you would try to stick an OST in the mix. I even TS my email from my local Desktop now. Why use my proc for Email when I can use someone else's. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Johnson, Richard (NY Int) Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Let me know if you hear anything about this. One of my users wants to do this too. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage I would like to be able to create an ost on a remote laptop that uses Citrix over the Internet. I would like to avoid having the user dialup and sync (higher cost and lower bandwidth). Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Why would you want an OST in a TS profile? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Does anyone know a workaround to Q242195? Windows 2000 Terminal Services Does Not Support Outlook Offline Storage http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q242195 Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage
That makes more sense.. They want to be able to work with no connection but then connect to TS and have the mail be the same on the laptop and on the server. Could you setup a separate client that ran IMAP just for the offline sessions to catch up on email? Voicestream wireless Cellphone dialup adaptors?? VPN connections?? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage We have a lot of road warriors that want to write email, etc. while offline (in meetings, on an airplane, etc.) and synchronize with the home office when they're back in the hotel room. It's MUCH cheaper for them to use the Internet connection in the hotel room rather than dial up from Finland back to Texas. Not to mention MUCH faster. I'm would like to get the TS/Outlook2K to create an ost on their local drive that can be accessed by their local Outlook2K while offline. Thanks, Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage They want to have a local OST, that is accessed from the server over a TS session over the internet? That does not sound possible at all. I access my outlook over a TS session. All of the email lives on the email server. I have a 4 gig email box. And have no speed problems at all. No PST no OST. I have no clue how or why you would try to stick an OST in the mix. I even TS my email from my local Desktop now. Why use my proc for Email when I can use someone else's. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Johnson, Richard (NY Int) Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Let me know if you hear anything about this. One of my users wants to do this too. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage I would like to be able to create an ost on a remote laptop that uses Citrix over the Internet. I would like to avoid having the user dialup and sync (higher cost and lower bandwidth). Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Why would you want an OST in a TS profile? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Does anyone know a workaround to Q242195? Windows 2000 Terminal Services Does Not Support Outlook Offline Storage http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q242195 Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
MSExchangeSA Event ID 9188
About every 15 minutes my Exchange 2000 SP2 server has this in the event log (application): = Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeSA Event Category: General Event ID: 9188 Date: 8/19/2002 Time: 2:36:44 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Microsoft Exchange System Attendant failed to read the membership of group 'cn=Exchange Domain Servers,cn=Users,dc=domainname,dc=dcname'. Error code '8007203a'. Please check whether the local computer is a member of the group. If it is not, stop all the Microsoft Exchange services, add the local computer into the group manually and restart all the services. === So, checking microsoft Q294176, it says : This behavior occurs because the security group object that is specified in the error message is no longer in the Users container, which is where Exchange Server expects the object to be. So I look in my AD, in the users container there is an exchange domain servers and the servername is in that group. What does this mean?My exchange server SEEMS to be working just fine. I only have a single domain, with a single exchange server. I haven't even created any OU's yet. Perhaps this is from the ADC I had to create before I upgraded my exchange server? Do I still need that ADC? Any constructive suggestions would be appreciated. Tom Gray, Network Engineer All Kinds of Minds The Center for Development and Learning University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ATT Net: (919)960- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage
VPN. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage We have a lot of road warriors that want to write email, etc. while offline (in meetings, on an airplane, etc.) and synchronize with the home office when they're back in the hotel room. It's MUCH cheaper for them to use the Internet connection in the hotel room rather than dial up from Finland back to Texas. Not to mention MUCH faster. I'm would like to get the TS/Outlook2K to create an ost on their local drive that can be accessed by their local Outlook2K while offline. Thanks, Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage They want to have a local OST, that is accessed from the server over a TS session over the internet? That does not sound possible at all. I access my outlook over a TS session. All of the email lives on the email server. I have a 4 gig email box. And have no speed problems at all. No PST no OST. I have no clue how or why you would try to stick an OST in the mix. I even TS my email from my local Desktop now. Why use my proc for Email when I can use someone else's. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Johnson, Richard (NY Int) Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Let me know if you hear anything about this. One of my users wants to do this too. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage I would like to be able to create an ost on a remote laptop that uses Citrix over the Internet. I would like to avoid having the user dialup and sync (higher cost and lower bandwidth). Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Why would you want an OST in a TS profile? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Does anyone know a workaround to Q242195? Windows 2000 Terminal Services Does Not Support Outlook Offline Storage http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q242195 Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: MSExchangeSA Event ID 9188
Try this Rich Event ID: 9188 Source MSExchangeSA Type Error Description Microsoft Exchange System Attendant failed to read the membership of group 'cn=Exchange Domain Servers,cn=Users,dc=your domain'. Error code '80072030'. Please check whether the local computer is a member of the group. If it is not, stop all the Microsoft Exchange services, add the local computer into the group manually and restart all the services. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Comments Adrian Grigorof: As per Microsoft: This problem can occur because Setup searches for these groups in only the default user container, and if they are not in the default user container Setup determines that the groups do not exist. See the link below for more info. Links Q260914 Contributors Adrian Grigorof -Original Message- From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MSExchangeSA Event ID 9188 About every 15 minutes my Exchange 2000 SP2 server has this in the event log (application): = Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeSA Event Category: General Event ID: 9188 Date: 8/19/2002 Time: 2:36:44 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Microsoft Exchange System Attendant failed to read the membership of group 'cn=Exchange Domain Servers,cn=Users,dc=domainname,dc=dcname'. Error code '8007203a'. Please check whether the local computer is a member of the group. If it is not, stop all the Microsoft Exchange services, add the local computer into the group manually and restart all the services. === So, checking microsoft Q294176, it says : This behavior occurs because the security group object that is specified in the error message is no longer in the Users container, which is where Exchange Server expects the object to be. So I look in my AD, in the users container there is an exchange domain servers and the servername is in that group. What does this mean?My exchange server SEEMS to be working just fine. I only have a single domain, with a single exchange server. I haven't even created any OU's yet. Perhaps this is from the ADC I had to create before I upgraded my exchange server? Do I still need that ADC? Any constructive suggestions would be appreciated. Tom Gray, Network Engineer All Kinds of Minds The Center for Development and Learning University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ATT Net: (919)960- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MSExchangeSA Event ID 9188
Thanks, but as I indicated in my original question the local computer IS a member of the group, and has been the entire time. Tom Gray, Network Engineer All Kinds of Minds The Center for Development and Learning University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ATT Net: (919)960- -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MSExchangeSA Event ID 9188 Try this Rich Event ID: 9188 Source MSExchangeSA Type Error Description Microsoft Exchange System Attendant failed to read the membership of group 'cn=Exchange Domain Servers,cn=Users,dc=your domain'. Error code '80072030'. Please check whether the local computer is a member of the group. If it is not, stop all the Microsoft Exchange services, add the local computer into the group manually and restart all the services. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Comments Adrian Grigorof: As per Microsoft: This problem can occur because Setup searches for these groups in only the default user container, and if they are not in the default user container Setup determines that the groups do not exist. See the link below for more info. Links Q260914 Contributors Adrian Grigorof -Original Message- From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MSExchangeSA Event ID 9188 About every 15 minutes my Exchange 2000 SP2 server has this in the event log (application): = Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeSA Event Category: General Event ID: 9188 Date: 8/19/2002 Time: 2:36:44 PM User: N/A Computer: servername Description: Microsoft Exchange System Attendant failed to read the membership of group 'cn=Exchange Domain Servers,cn=Users,dc=domainname,dc=dcname'. Error code '8007203a'. Please check whether the local computer is a member of the group. If it is not, stop all the Microsoft Exchange services, add the local computer into the group manually and restart all the services. === So, checking microsoft Q294176, it says : This behavior occurs because the security group object that is specified in the error message is no longer in the Users container, which is where Exchange Server expects the object to be. So I look in my AD, in the users container there is an exchange domain servers and the servername is in that group. What does this mean?My exchange server SEEMS to be working just fine. I only have a single domain, with a single exchange server. I haven't even created any OU's yet. Perhaps this is from the ADC I had to create before I upgraded my exchange server? Do I still need that ADC? Any constructive suggestions would be appreciated. Tom Gray, Network Engineer All Kinds of Minds The Center for Development and Learning University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ATT Net: (919)960- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2K Backups and Service Packs
This is an interesting situation we just encountered that I thought others would be interested in. In our test environment, we recently upgraded one of the E2K servers to SP3. Afterwards, for various reasons, we needed to go back to an SP2 version of the database, so we tried to restore the older databases, but were getting JET errors. After talking with Microsoft, we found out that once an Exchange Server is upgraded to a newer service pack, you cannot recover an older-version database using the later-version Exchange server. This applies to 3rd party backup software, as well as native Win2K backups. This means that if, for compliance or business reasons, you need to keep older versions of your databases archived, you need to know which version of the software that database last ran under. In addition you would need to make sure that when you restore, you must do so on a server that is patched only to that level of Service Pack. Apparently this applies to the Private IS only, and not Public IS. Once you mount the older-version database on its corresponding server, you can then dismount it and move it to a newer version server so that you can use it (if necessary). If you have any other information about this, I'd be interested in reading your responses. Harold Waisel FleetBoston [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K Backups and Service Packs
Some hotfixes can have this effect as well, which underscores the need for well documented change control. -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K Backups and Service Packs This is an interesting situation we just encountered that I thought others would be interested in. In our test environment, we recently upgraded one of the E2K servers to SP3. Afterwards, for various reasons, we needed to go back to an SP2 version of the database, so we tried to restore the older databases, but were getting JET errors. After talking with Microsoft, we found out that once an Exchange Server is upgraded to a newer service pack, you cannot recover an older-version database using the later-version Exchange server. This applies to 3rd party backup software, as well as native Win2K backups. This means that if, for compliance or business reasons, you need to keep older versions of your databases archived, you need to know which version of the software that database last ran under. In addition you would need to make sure that when you restore, you must do so on a server that is patched only to that level of Service Pack. Apparently this applies to the Private IS only, and not Public IS. Once you mount the older-version database on its corresponding server, you can then dismount it and move it to a newer version server so that you can use it (if necessary). If you have any other information about this, I'd be interested in reading your responses. Harold Waisel FleetBoston [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
Hi All, I am trying to find some kind of documentation on the different levels of logging in the 'diagnostics logging' tab of the IMC (Exchange 5.5). I am trying to find out what is logged at the different levels for all the categories. (Initialization/Termination, Addressing, Message Transfer, SMTP Interface Events, Internal Processing, SMTP Protocol Log, and Message Archival) Thanks in advance! Joe Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2K SP3 and moderated public folders?
Anybody have moderated folders quit working correctly after adding SP3? One of our moderated folders (meaning posted items are forwarded first to a moderator, auto message generated for the sender, previewed, and then OK'ed for the public folder) no longer works. The moderator does not get the message, the auto message is not sent and the item is not posted. If I turn off moderation users can post freely - no problems. Has only been a problem since Exchange SP3. We use a single domain, single Exchange server, single site on Windows 2k sp2. Thanks for your input. Timothy J. Hooks, MCSE Kegler, Brown, Hill Ritter Columbus, Ohio _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000
This article does not mention about configuring the smtp connector on the 2000 Server.Do I need to create a new smtp connector on my 2000 Server? My 2 exchange servers(5.5 and 2000) are sitting behind an smtp server(Interscan viruswall)which sends and receives mail from the Internet and a PIX firewall. Currently the smtp server bounces the mail to port 6000 of the exchange 5.5 server. Can I use the same port for the exchange 2000 server also? Thanks for any help. Raj -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Last modified version is 5/31/2002 -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Are there any Q articles(other than Q316886) pertaining to this some one can point me to? I am just about ready to route my internet mail through the exchange 2000 server. Thanks and happy Friday. Raj -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 What if I just remove the SMTP Address Space, recalculate routing on the ex5.5 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 8:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Yes but if you don't cost it out first, it will still be using it when you remove it (i.e. if you have high volume, this can lead to stranded/lost mail). -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 7:28 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 So what you are saying is to make the ex5.5 a cost of 2. The default cost in ex2000 is 1. Therefore it will use ex2000 for all outbound traffic? What will happen when I remove the IMS on Ex5.5? Will it automatically recalc the routing to the ex2000 server? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Did you change the cost on the 5.5 one? If they're all cost 1, then mail will continue to follow the route it knows. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:38 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Subject: Ex5.5 IMS connector in ex2000 Running Exchange in mixed mode, with final exchange 5.5 server ready to be removed. I have changed the site addressing to my new ex2000 server and recalculated routing, but, noticed that email is still going out via the IMS on the Ex5.5 server. Inbound mail comes in OK, just outgoing email goes out via the Ex5.5 IMS. I've stopped the services - but - guess that I actually need to remove the IMS from the ex5.5 server in-order to get mail routed outbound via ex2000. Do I need to setup a new smtp connector in ex2000 or is this automatic after I removed the ex5.5 IMS? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is
host unreachable
Hello, I have a problem with guy at my job, he cant send to a certain address (domain ppco.com) he gets a returned failure saying host unreachable. I sent a test message to this address and looked in the queue on the server (exchange 5.5 sp6) and its just sitting there. We dont have problems sending to anyone else. Also i sent a test message from my hotmail account and told the guy to reply and he did. Is the problem related to maybe this person having a reverse lookup zone and us not having one. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: host unreachable
What's the domain name??? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: host unreachable Hello, I have a problem with guy at my job, he cant send to a certain address (domain ppco.com) he gets a returned failure saying host unreachable. I sent a test message to this address and looked in the queue on the server (exchange 5.5 sp6) and its just sitting there. We dont have problems sending to anyone else. Also i sent a test message from my hotmail account and told the guy to reply and he did. Is the problem related to maybe this person having a reverse lookup zone and us not having one. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: host unreachable
certain address (domain ppco.com) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: host unreachable What's the domain name??? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: host unreachable Hello, I have a problem with guy at my job, he cant send to a certain address (domain ppco.com) he gets a returned failure saying host unreachable. I sent a test message to this address and looked in the queue on the server (exchange 5.5 sp6) and its just sitting there. We dont have problems sending to anyone else. Also i sent a test message from my hotmail account and told the guy to reply and he did. Is the problem related to maybe this person having a reverse lookup zone and us not having one. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: host unreachable
ppco.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: host unreachable What's the domain name??? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: host unreachable Hello, I have a problem with guy at my job, he cant send to a certain address (domain ppco.com) he gets a returned failure saying host unreachable. I sent a test message to this address and looked in the queue on the server (exchange 5.5 sp6) and its just sitting there. We dont have problems sending to anyone else. Also i sent a test message from my hotmail account and told the guy to reply and he did. Is the problem related to maybe this person having a reverse lookup zone and us not having one. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: host unreachable
I had the same problem with this domain. PPCO is Philips Petroleum. They do reverse lookups of your mail server. I didn't have a reverse DNS entry and for testing purposes I had the admin add my server to his hosts file. That fixed the problem. I have since added the reverse DNS entry. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: host unreachable certain address (domain ppco.com) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: host unreachable What's the domain name??? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: host unreachable Hello, I have a problem with guy at my job, he cant send to a certain address (domain ppco.com) he gets a returned failure saying host unreachable. I sent a test message to this address and looked in the queue on the server (exchange 5.5 sp6) and its just sitting there. We dont have problems sending to anyone else. Also i sent a test message from my hotmail account and told the guy to reply and he did. Is the problem related to maybe this person having a reverse lookup zone and us not having one. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: host unreachable
thank you I thought it was that just wanted to verify. Rich -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 5:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: host unreachable I had the same problem with this domain. PPCO is Philips Petroleum. They do reverse lookups of your mail server. I didn't have a reverse DNS entry and for testing purposes I had the admin add my server to his hosts file. That fixed the problem. I have since added the reverse DNS entry. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: host unreachable certain address (domain ppco.com) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: host unreachable What's the domain name??? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: host unreachable Hello, I have a problem with guy at my job, he cant send to a certain address (domain ppco.com) he gets a returned failure saying host unreachable. I sent a test message to this address and looked in the queue on the server (exchange 5.5 sp6) and its just sitting there. We dont have problems sending to anyone else. Also i sent a test message from my hotmail account and told the guy to reply and he did. Is the problem related to maybe this person having a reverse lookup zone and us not having one. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
