RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

2002-09-09 Thread Ed Crowley

I suggest your skin is too thin.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joe Rojas
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 8:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


Chris,

> On average you will find some of the most exchange knowledgeable 
> people on this list. You'll also find them, on average, to be 
> extremely helpful.

I don't dispute this. The "Boy if I had only known" comment was to
suggest if I had know about the crap for asking a question.

> Well, there is no link. The scope of your query wasn't limited to just

> a link. If it was, you'd have gotten the answer you wanted. But your
> reason(ing) is circular, and when complaining about our inability to 
> think it a rational manner that's kinds funny.

See other reply. (Again, what did you think I wanted. Could you try to
define what the scope of MY query was?) As far as you telling me my
reasoning is circular...huh? Do even know what you meant by using that
word? I did not say that there was a link or that there even was an
answer! I can see as how you might have interpreted that but I can't
control your thought process.

> In general we're also pretty busy.

This is like saying "Oh ya! Apples are red!" totally irrelevant. What
does time have to do with this? Stick to the topic.

> So if you'd taken the time to properly
> phrase your technical question you would have saved all of us 
> (yourself included a lot of time).

That was my best shot at asking the question. How could I have gotten
more technical with out having more knowledge of the subject. That is
what circular reasoning is: Ask a more technical question of something
you do not know the technical information about.

> Did you read the FAQ before you posted? If you had, you might have 
> saved yourself from the perceived condescension you feel you've been 
> subjected
to.
> Based on the question you /asked/ the responses were reasonable. 
> Perhaps
the
> fact the question was completely ignored the first time you asked it
should
> have served as a clue that it needed some work. Your insistence on
reposting
> it without further revision or comment speaks volumes.

I did read the FAQ sometime ago. I will admit that you are right on this
point. Maybe I should have reworded my post. I have had problems before,
where my posts did not make it through and I thought this might have
been the case. 
On the other hand, I feel my post was stating exactly what I wanted.
Could you rewrite for me to show me how it should have read? I WAS
looking for some form of documentation on IMC logging, let me see it how
you would have done it?

> Now, if your feelings are just too hurt, there are a number of other 
> Exchange forums you might try. You'll find a heavy overlap of the top 
> contributors in those forums as well, but who knows... You might get 
> lucky and someone will tell you "there is no link" or do a ton of work

> to
satisfy
> your seemingly idle curiosity.

Are we in 1st grade? No. My feeling are not hurt. I was just I little
taken by the arrogance of the replies I received, which you seem to
think are OK. What is wrong with idle curiosity? If you have a problem
with asking questions as a form of learning that is ok, but it doesn't
mean everyone thinks that way.


Joe Rojas


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

Joe,

On average you will find some of the most exchange knowledgeable people
on this list. You'll also find them, on average, to be extremely
helpful.

> The reason, that seemed obvious to me, that I asked the question was 
> to have a link or something that would have taken about 10 seconds to 
> type that would have pointed me it the right direction.

Well, there is no link. The scope of your query wasn't limited to just a
link. If it was, you'd have gotten the answer you wanted. But your
reason(ing) is circular, and when complaining about our inability to
think it a rational manner that's kinds funny.

>I thought to myself...Hey,
> these guys seem pretty smart on this list, let me ask them.  Boy, if I

>had only known...wow!

In general we're also pretty busy. So if you'd taken the time to
properly phrase your technical question you would have saved all of us
(yourself included a lot of time).

> Go back and read those replies that you guys wrote. They sound kind of

> silly huh?

I've reread mine and find a distinct lack of silliness or irrational
thought. Perhaps you can enlighten me.

> I was referred to this list by someone who mentioned that the people 
> here are a great help...he forgot to mention the condescending 
> comments that I you have to endure to get that help...


Did you read the FAQ before you posted? If you ha

RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

2002-09-09 Thread Ed Crowley

You want to learn?  Try twiddling the logging levels and see what
happens.  If I knew of a handy-dandy reference that I could pull out of
my head and give you, I'd have done it.  Not having one, I merely
pointed out that you could very easily determine the answer to your
inquiry.  Had you been doing that instead of whining here, you'd have a
nice handy-dandy reference you could post on the list for the benefit of
the rest of those who might be interested in the same thing.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joe Rojas
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


The reason I asked was to learn. Some are ok with only knowing "half the
story", others are not.

When I asked in my original post, I just want a link to some type of
document. Guess that was too much to ask for. My mistake.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 6:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

Your proposed answer would have been technically and factually
inaccurate.

I'm curious as to why anyone would need such a list (since I've worked
with thousands of Exchange organizations without a sheet detailing this
information). Perhaps if you had a goal you were trying to achieve with
regards to monitoring and reporting or something, we could provide you
with a push in the right direction. But at the moment, your post appears
to be nothing more than idle curiosity, in which case "figure it out for
yourself by testing" is a more than appropriate response.

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/8/2002 2:09 PM
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

I think that an answer of "You know, I have no clue." would have been
better
:)

The purpose of asking was to see if anyone knew. I know I could do some
testing but I that would not show me everything. Testing will only give
me a partial answer and I am looking for a complete one.

Thanks for the attempt though!

Joe Rojas

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 1:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

Try them and see.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joe Rojas
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


Hi All,

I am trying to find some kind of documentation on the different
levels of logging in the 'diagnostics logging' tab of the IMC (Exchange
5.5). I am trying to find out what is logged at the different levels for
all the categories. (Initialization/Termination, Addressing, Message
Transfer, SMTP Interface Events, Internal Processing, SMTP Protocol Log,
and Message
Archival)

Thanks in advance!

Joe Rojas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: custom NDR?

2002-09-09 Thread Ed Crowley

(blindfold sales surge noted)

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?


(digital camera sales surge noted)

(:=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?


Thank you, thank you, I believe I'll be modelling said pink sundresses
in a hotel bar at MEC...

-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 00:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?


Brilliant. Verbally succinct, dead on target. Rapier wit.

I rate this answer at 5 pink sundresses. Well done, Gary. What are your
plans for following up on this critical success?

(:=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?


Got education?  Learn the difference between "u" and "you".

-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 16:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?


Got money ?  Get MS to consult for u.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes
(IT)
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: custom NDR?


OK I'm looking for info, but in the meantime, in both/either 5.5 or 2k
can you make custom NDR's?  or change the text of current ones?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K

2002-09-09 Thread Ed Crowley

It even comes on the Exchange 2000 CD.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K


It's called Exchange5.5.

Do keep up.

William


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N.
Precht
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 7:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K


I thought I heard there was a really limited featured Exchange 2000
install if you didn't have AD.  Am I wrong?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 17:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K


>>no AD anywhere and none planned in the near future.

Then no Exchange2000.

Looks like you'll be happy with 5.5 for awhile.

William

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eric Fors, II
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.

2002-09-09 Thread Ed Crowley

Thanks, Bubba.  It's what I pointed out four days ago.

Ed

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bubba G
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.


It is Exchange aware only after you load Exchange. One of the things
Exchange does is modify ntbackup to be Exchange aware.


-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.


>From what I have been reading the Windows NT 2000 version of
ntbackup.exe is not Exchange aware.

I know they tell you to to use the Exchange 2000 version for MS Exchange
2000 Server.  Admittedly, I don't recall anything about using it with MS
Exchange 5.5.

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

> --
> From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2002 11:23
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  NT 2000 backup of Exchange.
> 
> Exchange 5.5 SP4 under NT 2000 SP2.
> 
> Well we have our first 2000 server up running Exchange 5.5 SP3.   I'm
> trying
> to get the backups to run similar to what I had with NT 4.0.  With the

> 4.0 version I had the cmd set to initialize any tape in the drive,
> backup and eject and mail the logs for verification.
> 
> With 2000 I used the wizard to create the backup but I can't seem to
> get it to grab any tape I have inserted.  I tried adding multiple 
> tapes to the media pool with the same name, but I always get "The 
> operation was not performed, no storage media was specified" message 
> on the report.  What am I
> missing?  There must be a simple way to say any tape in there grab it
and
> use it for a backup.
> 
> Pete Pfefferkorn
> Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
> University of Cincinnati
> 51 Goodman Street
> Cincinnati, OH  45221
> Phone - (513) 556-9076
> Fax - (513) 556-2042
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

2002-09-09 Thread Trent Hancock

Finally, a voice of reason.

I understood the original question and also thought the 'test it for
yourself' answer a bit short.

I remember desiring the same information once, and after trying Ed's method,
and quickly had a 10mb application log full of useless information before I
could turn it off.  :-)   One would think some info on most of the options
could be publicly available with special ones to be used on advice of PSS
only.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


Actually there is an answer.  PSS should be able to access the document
if you can justify the need for the information.  Part of the
information is covered in Paul Robichaux's Exchange 5.5 book too.

Folks are much too touchy here.  This group is really much less
entertaining as an ongoing rugby scrum.

I think the question could have been phrased better.  Thus the "What to
do before you post" part of the FAQ.  But I also find "figure it out
yourself" to be less than helpful.

And, as for whether anyone here knows the answer or not, I suspect that
the ones who do have kept humbly silent as they are likely prevented by
NDA from disclosing the information.  Folks used to get upset at "call
PSS".  Hope that's not still the case - it's the right answer.

I'd suggest that a copy of the previously mentioned Robichaux book be
added to the reading list of anyone still working with Exchange 5.5.

===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED]  www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc.   Austin, TX512-322-0071
===

-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


Joe, I really don't think there IS an answer to that question.  In that
case, "try it yourself if you want to know" really is an acceptable
answer.  Sometimes, the documentation just doesn't exist.

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


By asking question and accepting answers with no content? I applaud you.
But unfortunately, not everyone works that way.


-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

Yes, I would have.  That's the way I learned Exchange.  :)

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


Michelle,

I am sorry to hear about this, but I am sure if it is out there
I will find it. It will just take me longer than if someone opted to
help me.

It doesn't surprise me that you took the time to tell me this
though, your reputation precedes you.

Just curious...how would you have dealt with the situation? If
someone told you to just try it, would you have just said "OK"?

Thanks,
Joe Rojas

-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

Joe:

I know of *at least* two ex-PSS people who read this list, and a few
current MS employees who read the list as well.  Perhaps one of them
would have helped you had you not responded in such a manner.

Maybe one of them was even looking for an answer when your reply came
across the wire.

The tone of your replies, though, were such that you'll never know.

Love 'n' kisses,

-Michelle

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

<>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_

RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel...

2002-09-09 Thread Trent Hancock

Aha !

The Great One is an AGGIE ?

:-)


Trent Hancock
Native Terp, Assimilated Longhorn

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel...


"pleasesirmayihavesomemore" 

(:=



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5

2002-09-09 Thread Webb, Andy

I didn't see it in the FAQ.  Can't remember what we stuck in there
anymore.

Sharepoint Portal server can index and search 5.5 public folders.  As
could Site Server 3.0.

There are also third party products (see slipstick.com I think).

===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED]  www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc.   Austin, TX512-322-0071
=== 

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 7:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5


Yes.[1]


[1] For additonal information, reference the FAQ.[2]
[2] Outlook? www.slipstick.com

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kleinsinger
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/4/2002 7:58 PM
Subject: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5

Microsoft says it isn't possible
(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q196533), but
is there any way to search multiple public folders?  We're using Outlook
XP with Exchange 5.5.  Thanks,

Daniel Kleinsinger
Lonely Planet US


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Slighty OT - Script site creation

2002-09-09 Thread Webb, Andy

ever dig this up?  I'd post it on our script library if so...

===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED]  www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc.   Austin, TX512-322-0071
=== 

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slighty OT - Script site creation


I wrote one some time ago.  I'll see if I can find a place to post it.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Childers
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 6:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slighty OT - Script site creation


I am beginnig the testing on our w2k/e2k migration and was wondering if
there is an adsi script floating around that will automate the creation
of sites/subnets for w2k.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

2002-09-09 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones

Not to mention the numerous Secret Cabals of Exchange Admins.

(:=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Harmon,
Michelle M.
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


Joe:

I know of *at least* two ex-PSS people who read this list, and a few
current MS employees who read the list as well.  Perhaps one of them
would have helped you had you not responded in such a manner.  

Maybe one of them was even looking for an answer when your reply came
across the wire.

The tone of your replies, though, were such that you'll never know.

Love 'n' kisses,

-Michelle

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

<>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

2002-09-09 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones

Damn straight she would. Time and again. Take a page from her book and
submit to the power of following simple instructions.

(:=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Harmon,
Michelle M.
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


Yes, I would have.  That's the way I learned Exchange.  :)

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


Michelle,

I am sorry to hear about this, but I am sure if it is out there
I will find it. It will just take me longer than if someone opted to
help me.

It doesn't surprise me that you took the time to tell me this
though, your reputation precedes you.

Just curious...how would you have dealt with the situation? If
someone told you to just try it, would you have just said "OK"?

Thanks,
Joe Rojas

-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

Joe:

I know of *at least* two ex-PSS people who read this list, and a few
current MS employees who read the list as well.  Perhaps one of them
would have helped you had you not responded in such a manner.

Maybe one of them was even looking for an answer when your reply came
across the wire.

The tone of your replies, though, were such that you'll never know.

Love 'n' kisses,

-Michelle

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

<>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel...

2002-09-09 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones

Sweet gurgling gugs!

Look, man, EXCHANGE IS CRUEL. WHY SHOULD WE BE ANY DIFFERENT?

Query on Exchange and cruel and this link shows up:

http://radio.weblogs.com/0102764/stories/2002/01/30/whyWeSayexchangeIsCruel.
html

You'll find Exchange admins are not as polite, quiet, or easy to work with
as SQL DBAs. Roll with the punches, learn how to properly phrase your
questions, say, "pleasesirmayihavesomemore" when we offer constructive
criticism (or constrictive, depending on who answers), and get on with your
drear mortal existence.

(:=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Rojas
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


So what is your conclusion Chris? Should I first learn everything I need to
know before I ask a question so that my question can be accurately written?
Wouldn't that mean that I wouldn't have to ask the question? I am confused.
That question was properly phrase relative to my knowledge of Exchange. I
can see how to you it would be poorly phrase but you don't seem to remember
that we all start out as "newbies" to exchange, even you. How did you learn?
Did you do everything on your own? If you did, I admire that. I am more
likely to bet that you asked question along the way. Just because your
knowledge of Exchange is where I want to get my knowledge level doesn't mean
that you have to look down on the little people...or does it? I wouldn't
know because I haven't got there yet...

Joe Rojas

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

"some kind of documentation" is a vague statement. It could be taken to mean
many things, including all of those that you listed. "A link" which you
referred to in your later queries lamenting the unhelpfulness of the list is
a much less vague query.

You followed up the query you snipped below with the following, "I am trying
to find out what is logged at the different levels for all the categories."
"Try it and see" is an appropriate response to that statement.

In the last 12 months I've answered ~=3,000 Exchange related queries.[1] I
did read your post before answering, in fact I read both of them. I ignored
both of them as being vague and generally not worthy of my time. I only
joined in when you criticized the quality of the answer you received. And
then, only to point out the quality of the answer was directly proportional
to the quality of the question. You can continue to argue that your question
was a well thought out and a quality one if you like. Based on my experience
I don't find that to be true, but then it doesn't much matter to me since
for the most part I know enough of the answer to your question to get by on
a day to day basis (and develop applications which utilize the data).

I applaud your desire to know more about how Exchange works. It's always a
good thing to be curious. However, given the limited public documentation on
the subject, and the lack of a pressing "need to know" Ed's answer continues
to be the best one I can point you to.

If you think I'm sick in the head for imagining that you could want someone
to type it all up for you, you've obviously not seen some of the posts I
have. You've also not seen some of the work I (and others) have done to
answer queries way beyond what some would consider reasonable when not
getting paid for it.

[1] That's down 20% or more from the previous 3 years, but I've been a bit
busy.


> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:44 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
>
>
> Hi Chris,
>
>   Again I apologize for leaving too much for you to
> figure out. My fault. What do you think the statement of, "I
> am trying to find some kind of documentation on the different
> levels of logging in the 'diagnostics logging' tab of the IMC
> (Exchange 5.5)." means? (quote taking directly from my original post)
>
>   Did you think that I wanted you to type up a document
> with the information I was looking for? Did you think I was
> hoping you could find the document and type the whole thing
> in an e-mail? Or that you would locate the document, print it
> out and then mail it to me?
>
>   Chris, I appreciate you trying to get involved in the
> conversation but please read the actually posts before joining in.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe Rojas
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:33 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
>
> You didn't ask for "just a link". If you had, we would have
> simply answered, "there isn't one[1]". Which was more or less
> Ed's answer.
>
> [1] If you want to know, go test for yourself.
>
> > -Original 

RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

2002-09-09 Thread Webb, Andy

Actually there is an answer.  PSS should be able to access the document
if you can justify the need for the information.  Part of the
information is covered in Paul Robichaux's Exchange 5.5 book too.

Folks are much too touchy here.  This group is really much less
entertaining as an ongoing rugby scrum.

I think the question could have been phrased better.  Thus the "What to
do before you post" part of the FAQ.  But I also find "figure it out
yourself" to be less than helpful.

And, as for whether anyone here knows the answer or not, I suspect that
the ones who do have kept humbly silent as they are likely prevented by
NDA from disclosing the information.  Folks used to get upset at "call
PSS".  Hope that's not still the case - it's the right answer.

I'd suggest that a copy of the previously mentioned Robichaux book be
added to the reading list of anyone still working with Exchange 5.5.

===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED]  www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc.   Austin, TX512-322-0071
=== 

-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


Joe, I really don't think there IS an answer to that question.  In that
case, "try it yourself if you want to know" really is an acceptable
answer.  Sometimes, the documentation just doesn't exist.

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


By asking question and accepting answers with no content? I applaud you.
But unfortunately, not everyone works that way.


-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

Yes, I would have.  That's the way I learned Exchange.  :)

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


Michelle,

I am sorry to hear about this, but I am sure if it is out there
I will find it. It will just take me longer than if someone opted to
help me.

It doesn't surprise me that you took the time to tell me this
though, your reputation precedes you.

Just curious...how would you have dealt with the situation? If
someone told you to just try it, would you have just said "OK"?

Thanks,
Joe Rojas

-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

Joe:

I know of *at least* two ex-PSS people who read this list, and a few
current MS employees who read the list as well.  Perhaps one of them
would have helped you had you not responded in such a manner.

Maybe one of them was even looking for an answer when your reply came
across the wire.

The tone of your replies, though, were such that you'll never know.

Love 'n' kisses,

-Michelle

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

<>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ: 

RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

2002-09-09 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones


Chris, I appreciate you trying to get involved in the conversation
but please read the actually posts before joining in.

Thanks,

Joe Rojas


Sweet gibbering ghouls! If you only knew *how much* of the posts Chris
Scharff not only reads, but re-reads and later meditates upon, you'd never
have said such a thing.

(:=

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

You didn't ask for "just a link". If you had, we would have simply answered,
"there isn't one[1]". Which was more or less Ed's answer.

[1] If you want to know, go test for yourself.

> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 8:31 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
>
>
> The reason I asked was to learn. Some are ok with only
> knowing "half the story", others are not.
>
> When I asked in my original post, I just want a link to some
> type of document. Guess that was too much to ask for. My mistake.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 6:57 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
>
> Your proposed answer would have been technically and
> factually inaccurate.
>
> I'm curious as to why anyone would need such a list (since
> I've worked with thousands of Exchange organizations without
> a sheet detailing this information). Perhaps if you had a
> goal you were trying to achieve with regards to monitoring
> and reporting or something, we could provide you with a push
> in the right direction. But at the moment, your post appears
> to be nothing more than idle curiosity, in which case "figure
> it out for yourself by testing" is a more than appropriate response.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Rojas
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Sent: 9/8/2002 2:09 PM
> Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
>
> I think that an answer of "You know, I have no clue." would
> have been better
> :)
>
> The purpose of asking was to see if anyone knew. I know I
> could do some testing but I that would not show me
> everything. Testing will only give me a partial answer and I
> am looking for a complete one.
>
> Thanks for the attempt though!
>
> Joe Rojas
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 1:18 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
>
> Try them and see.
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> hp Services
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joe Rojas
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:00 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to find some kind of documentation on the
> different levels of logging in the 'diagnostics logging' tab
> of the IMC (Exchange 5.5). I am trying to find out what is
> logged at the different levels for all the categories.
> (Initialization/Termination, Addressing, Message Transfer,
> SMTP Interface Events, Internal Processing, SMTP Protocol
> Log, and Message
> Archival)
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Joe Rojas
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Removing Server from Admin Group

2002-09-09 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones

The magic of directory replication...

(:=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing Server from Admin Group


Well funny is this.  I went to do that and it was gone.  The last time I
checked was about an hour ago and it was still there.  Oh well.  Thanks for
the useful tip though.

Thank you,

Alex Gonzalez
Senior System Administrator
Handleman Company
(248) 362-4400 ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing Server from Admin Group

In that case, you can try removing it from ADSI edit.
Configuration-->services-->exchange-->org name-->administrative
group-->storage group-->and your server will be there.  Be careful, if you
remove the wrong thing it could be very uncool.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing Server from Admin Group


No the server crashed and I had to rebuild it.


-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing Server from Admin Group

Did you try removing Exchange from that server from add/remove programs?

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing Server from Admin Group


I am currently running E2K SP3 and I went to remove one of the Servers and
asked if I was sure I clicked yes, the screen froze, and then came back, but
the Server was still there.  I tried to remove from other Exchange Servers
as well and it still wont go away.  Any idea's?

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior System Administrator
Handleman Company
(248) 362-4400 ext. 4914


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Pop error?

2002-09-09 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones

Well... some POP3 user or program is having authentication trouble. The
workaround in the KB suggests making sure the logon name and the mailbox
alias match up. That sounds like a valid avenue to explore here.

So... any of your users not able to log on? Can anyone log on via POP3?
Anyone waiting for a password change to sync up with the GC servers? How
many of them errors are you getting? How often?

(:=

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


um, not the right error -
this refers to 0x80040920 and 0x52e
my user managed to trigger something called 0x426 - which i can't find
anywhere. thanks for trying tho :) jp

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Q296387 found it on google.com key words: 1011 POP3SVC  Authentication

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pop error?


anyone know what this means? couldn't find anything on support.ms.com or by
googling... jeremy


Event Type: Error
Event Source:   POP3SVC
Event Category: Authentication
Event ID:   1011
Date:   9/6/2002
Time:   6:32:23 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   MAILBOX
Description:
Authentication attempt from xx to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has failed with
error 0x426.

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp.
Data:
: 49 02 4b 00   I.K.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Demoting BDC to member server running exchange

2002-09-09 Thread Webb, Andy

How about beginning your Win2K upgrade?  Then upgrade the E2K server to
Win2K and demote it in the process.  Nice and supported and takes you
forward toward the future.

===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED]  www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc.   Austin, TX512-322-0071
=== 

-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Demoting BDC to member server running exchange


I'm in the process of changing our exchange server (Exchange 5.5 SP4 on
NT 4
SP6a) which also happens to be a BDC to a stand alone server.  I want to
minimize downtime and was wondering if any of had used UPromote from
Algin Technology?  To either demote or promote a BDC to a member server.


Also what the recommendations are to this regard, should I just
re-install NT and exchange or trust UPromote? 

Thanks

 
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
  e-mail disclaimer  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trouble with forestprep

2002-09-09 Thread Webb, Andy

Late to this.

Change the service account to an account in the new domain.  Then do the
forest prep.

===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED]  www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc.   Austin, TX512-322-0071
=== 

-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trouble with forestprep


Does anyone have any other ideas/suggestions as to a workaround on this
issue?

Bill

-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trouble with forestprep


On the screen I can only enter a password, The username, which shows
"S&C\srcacct", and Domain, which is blank, are grayed out and cannot be
changed. Only the password field allows data entry. I found a article,
Q297921, which describes my problem but I could not get the resolution
and workaround to work with either sp2 or sp3.

Bill

-Original Message-
From: Crump, Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 10:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trouble with forestprep


did you put in S&C\svcacct ?  or just svcacct 

-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trouble with forestprep


I keep getting the error message "This account must be valid before
continuing"

This is a brief description on my layout:
Exchange 5.5 currently running in a Winnt 4.0 domain called "S&C" I am
trying to migrate to Exchange 2k and W2K. The root W2K domain name is
"SANDC". This was done to get rid of the legacy "S&C" name. I have
trusts setup between S&C and SANDC and they function properly. I get the
above error when I run the forest prep on the new SANDC domain and try
to join the existing exchange 5.5 in the S&C domain. It finds the 5.5
server, runs the prerequisite test and hangs on the service account
screen. This screen shows the proper 5.5 service account name and when I
enter the password, I get that error.

Bill Klosa
S&C Electric Co. 
Chicago, IL.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

2002-09-09 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones

No. Ed didn't bother to write this. I did, fool mortal.

(:=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Rojas
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


Is this Ed's bother? Sounds like it...

-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 7:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

He knows, but is sworn to secrecy on the subject. About all he'll ever offer
is the cryptic riddle, "Try them and see." If you spent more than a
millisecond deciphering that irony-laden statement, you would realize a dawn
of knowledge you never before imagined possible, which is probably why you
didn't spend any amount of time in excess of said millisecond trying to suss
out the meaning of Ed's Chinese puzzle.

You obviously haven't realized the connection between MS Exchange and the
JFK assassination. Once you do, you'll stop writing responses like the one
below and focus instead on that strange Error 45998 from the SMTP engine,
"Error 0008400D-C445643F in garrison.dll..."

(:=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Rojas
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


I think that an answer of "You know, I have no clue." would have been better
:)

The purpose of asking was to see if anyone knew. I know I could do some
testing but I that would not show me everything. Testing will only give me a
partial answer and I am looking for a complete one.

Thanks for the attempt though!

Joe Rojas

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 1:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

Try them and see.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joe Rojas
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


Hi All,

I am trying to find some kind of documentation on the different
levels of logging in the 'diagnostics logging' tab of the IMC (Exchange
5.5). I am trying to find out what is logged at the different levels for
all the categories. (Initialization/Termination, Addressing, Message
Transfer, SMTP Interface Events, Internal Processing, SMTP Protocol Log,
and Message
Archival)

Thanks in advance!

Joe Rojas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Martin Blackstone

Not the emanager component

-Original Message-
From: Trent Hancock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 7:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


Is this included in their Neatsuite ?   Similar to the gateway scanner
included in NAV CE?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Allan Johnson
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


eManager on a gateway server is definitely the way to go, it would only cost
you a 2000 server license and an acceptable PC (processor memory etc).  I
have mine running on a dual Pentium 200 with 512MB, leftover server.

The product works well and is relatively customizable, it catches 80-85% of
valid Spam, .1% valid emails out of 1500-2000 emails a day incoming (.1%
example whoever would of thought that Suma Cum Laude was not Spam? :oP).  I
second the PITA on not being able to change default rules and also the bug
that erased custom rules during an autoupdate (They fixed that one).

I give it 8 out of 10 against similar programs under $2000.

-Original Message-
From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I ran into that same problem - kind of defeats the purpose of the filter
when the subject contains the offensive language.  So we switched to the
MAPI version.  This has problems of it's own - it is not possible to
configure this product to scan incoming mail only.  Users attempt to save
contact or calandar items (which shouldn't be scanned) with a "banned" word
and they disappear.

A better solution (if you have the budget) is to scan on the gateway
instead.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


What version are you using?  ESE/API or  MAPI/AVAPI?.

I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually
appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to
open the message, you see the standard message "The email was blocked
according to rules." and I only have the Administrator being notified,
not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see
any notification.


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I'm using it at two clients sites.  I think that it works great.  I haven't
had any complaints.  It blocks 99.9% of the crap!  You can customize it as
well.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


Hello all,

Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you
are, thoughts - positive/negative?


Thanks - Brian


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To

RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Trent Hancock

Is this included in their Neatsuite ?   Similar to the gateway scanner
included in NAV CE?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Allan Johnson
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


eManager on a gateway server is definitely the way to go, it would only cost
you a 2000 server license and an acceptable PC (processor memory etc).  I
have mine running on a dual Pentium 200 with 512MB, leftover server.

The product works well and is relatively customizable, it catches 80-85% of
valid Spam, .1% valid emails out of 1500-2000 emails a day incoming (.1%
example whoever would of thought that Suma Cum Laude was not Spam? :oP).  I
second the PITA on not being able to change default rules and also the bug
that erased custom rules during an autoupdate (They fixed that one).

I give it 8 out of 10 against similar programs under $2000.

-Original Message-
From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I ran into that same problem - kind of defeats the purpose of the filter
when the subject contains the offensive language.  So we switched to the
MAPI version.  This has problems of it's own - it is not possible to
configure this product to scan incoming mail only.  Users attempt to save
contact or calandar items (which shouldn't be scanned) with a "banned" word
and they disappear.

A better solution (if you have the budget) is to scan on the gateway
instead.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


What version are you using?  ESE/API or  MAPI/AVAPI?.

I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually
appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to
open the message, you see the standard message "The email was blocked
according to rules." and I only have the Administrator being notified,
not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see
any notification.


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I'm using it at two clients sites.  I think that it works great.  I haven't
had any complaints.  It blocks 99.9% of the crap!  You can customize it as
well.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


Hello all,

Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you
are, thoughts - positive/negative?


Thanks - Brian


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: 

RE: Demoting BDC to member server running exchange

2002-09-09 Thread Chris Scharff

What's driving the domotion of the server to a member server?

-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/9/2002 4:50 PM
Subject: Demoting BDC to member server running exchange

I'm in the process of changing our exchange server (Exchange 5.5 SP4 on
NT 4
SP6a) which also happens to be a BDC to a stand alone server.  I want to
minimize downtime and was wondering if any of had used UPromote from
Algin
Technology?  To either demote or promote a BDC to a member server.  

Also what the recommendations are to this regard, should I just
re-install
NT and exchange or trust UPromote? 

Thanks

 
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
  e-mail disclaimer  

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: VPN

2002-09-09 Thread David N. Precht

Same IP scheme as the others?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffery
Caudill
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 08:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: VPN


I have my VPN Working, But it will not see my exchange 2000 server.  Is
there A setting in exchange to let it be seen over a VPN.

I Can see All servers on the network, but the exchange.

Thanks,
Jeff

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Demoting BDC to member server running exchange

2002-09-09 Thread Leeann McCallum

Used it on 5 or 6 servers a couple of years ago to move them from being a
BDC in a different domain to become members in a consolidated domain.
Worked great, and no probs since.  Servers still up and active.



-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, 10 September 2002 9:51 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Demoting BDC to member server running exchange


I'm in the process of changing our exchange server (Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT 4
SP6a) which also happens to be a BDC to a stand alone server.  I want to
minimize downtime and was wondering if any of had used UPromote from Algin
Technology?  To either demote or promote a BDC to a member server.  

Also what the recommendations are to this regard, should I just re-install
NT and exchange or trust UPromote? 

Thanks

 
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
  e-mail disclaimer  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient.  It
may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the
sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information
contained in it.  Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this
e-mail.

For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page
http://www.beca.co.nz

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Slow performance

2002-09-09 Thread Dflorea

Don't do diskkeeper against your store.  The rest of your disk stats
look to be OK.  Maybe someone else can give you better advice about what
perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue.


-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance


The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7
gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive.  The drives are brand
new drives and the database is also new.  We just migrated the users
over to this server about four weeks ago.  I have not run diskkeeper on
it though.  

Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive.  

Wilson




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance

What kind of shape is your drive in?  Have you run diskkeeper on it to
check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of
space?  How does your page file compare to your RAM?

David

-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance


Thanks.  I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being
heavily used.  There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite
a few people use it heavily.  I'll keep poking around, this just gets so
frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down".


Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance

We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network
issue.  Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's.  Our server was
running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the
box.


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance

How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander
that people access at the same time?

-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slow performance


Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users)  The machine is a
Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN.  The store drives are 5*32 gig
(Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition.


Calendar and folder switching is very slow.  Takes about 45 seconds to
switch to a different folder or to access the calendar.  Dismissing a
calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes.

The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can
do to speed this up a bit?

If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful.

Thanks,
Wilson









_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubsc

RE: Slow performance

2002-09-09 Thread Varghese, Wilson

The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both 
pub and priv are on this drive.  The drives are brand new drives and the database is 
also new.  We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago.  I 
have not run diskkeeper on it though.  

Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive.  

Wilson




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance

What kind of shape is your drive in?  Have you run diskkeeper on it to
check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of
space?  How does your page file compare to your RAM?

David

-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance


Thanks.  I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being
heavily used.  There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite
a few people use it heavily.  I'll keep poking around, this just gets so
frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down".


Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance

We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network
issue.  Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's.  Our server was
running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the
box.


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance

How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander
that people access at the same time?

-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slow performance


Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users)  The machine is a
Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN.  The store drives are 5*32 gig
(Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition.


Calendar and folder switching is very slow.  Takes about 45 seconds to
switch to a different folder or to access the calendar.  Dismissing a
calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes.

The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can
do to speed this up a bit?

If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful.

Thanks,
Wilson









_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Demoting BDC to member server running exchange

2002-09-09 Thread Scott Hostetler

Reinstall WinNT server will demote to member server.

Scott


Scott Hostetler, MS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  pager: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mario
Fernandez
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Demoting BDC to member server running exchange


Real-To:  Mario Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I'm in the process of changing our exchange server (Exchange 5.5 SP4 on
NT 4
SP6a) which also happens to be a BDC to a stand alone server.  I want to
minimize downtime and was wondering if any of had used UPromote from
Algin Technology?  To either demote or promote a BDC to a member server.


Also what the recommendations are to this regard, should I just
re-install NT and exchange or trust UPromote? 

Thanks

 
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
  e-mail disclaimer  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Demoting BDC to member server running exchange

2002-09-09 Thread Mario Fernandez

I'm in the process of changing our exchange server (Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT 4
SP6a) which also happens to be a BDC to a stand alone server.  I want to
minimize downtime and was wondering if any of had used UPromote from Algin
Technology?  To either demote or promote a BDC to a member server.  

Also what the recommendations are to this regard, should I just re-install
NT and exchange or trust UPromote? 

Thanks

 
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
  e-mail disclaimer  


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Slow performance

2002-09-09 Thread Dflorea

What kind of shape is your drive in?  Have you run diskkeeper on it to
check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of
space?  How does your page file compare to your RAM?

David

-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance


Thanks.  I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being
heavily used.  There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite
a few people use it heavily.  I'll keep poking around, this just gets so
frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down".


Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance

We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network
issue.  Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's.  Our server was
running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the
box.


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance

How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander
that people access at the same time?

-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slow performance


Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users)  The machine is a
Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN.  The store drives are 5*32 gig
(Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition.


Calendar and folder switching is very slow.  Takes about 45 seconds to
switch to a different folder or to access the calendar.  Dismissing a
calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. 

The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can
do to speed this up a bit? 

If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful.

Thanks,
Wilson









_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Chris Scharff

Right, if it blocked messages with XXX in the message body, it might be
important to know that if you work for the Texas Chili Parlor. But without
access to those default rules o the ability to edit them, for some
organizations that means not using them (which means more time manually
building your own).

> -Original Message-
> From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:06 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
> 
> 
> Oh, I forgot about that - you're talking about the anti-spam 
> rules which they provide in an encrypted file, right??  I'm 
> not sure what the point in preventing "us" from seeing this.  
> Trend sent me an unencrypted copy of the file (trend$rf) when 
> I asked them; but I'm not going to ask for a new copy every 
> time the file is updated, and it would be convenient to 
> verify what they are scanning for.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Allan Johnson

eManager on a gateway server is definitely the way to go, it would only cost
you a 2000 server license and an acceptable PC (processor memory etc).  I
have mine running on a dual Pentium 200 with 512MB, leftover server.

The product works well and is relatively customizable, it catches 80-85% of
valid Spam, .1% valid emails out of 1500-2000 emails a day incoming (.1%
example whoever would of thought that Suma Cum Laude was not Spam? :oP).  I
second the PITA on not being able to change default rules and also the bug
that erased custom rules during an autoupdate (They fixed that one).

I give it 8 out of 10 against similar programs under $2000.

-Original Message-
From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I ran into that same problem - kind of defeats the purpose of the filter
when the subject contains the offensive language.  So we switched to the
MAPI version.  This has problems of it's own - it is not possible to
configure this product to scan incoming mail only.  Users attempt to save
contact or calandar items (which shouldn't be scanned) with a "banned" word
and they disappear.

A better solution (if you have the budget) is to scan on the gateway
instead.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


What version are you using?  ESE/API or  MAPI/AVAPI?.

I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually
appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to
open the message, you see the standard message "The email was blocked
according to rules." and I only have the Administrator being notified,
not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see
any notification.


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I'm using it at two clients sites.  I think that it works great.  I haven't
had any complaints.  It blocks 99.9% of the crap!  You can customize it as
well.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


Hello all,

Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you
are, thoughts - positive/negative?


Thanks - Brian


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Slow performance

2002-09-09 Thread Katz, Gordon J.

Q216076



Gordon 



-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance


I hear that, I have a huge public contact folder and when people save info
to it, it takes about 45 seconds to save as well.  I just told them that its
so big thats why its slow. I guess there really is no solution for a large
amount of data for a public folder.

-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance


Thanks.  I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily
used.  There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people
use it heavily.  I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when
everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down".  

Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance

We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue.
Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's.  Our server was running at
like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box.


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance

How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that
people access at the same time?

-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slow performance


Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users)  The machine is a Compaq
DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN.  The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and
the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. 

Calendar and folder switching is very slow.  Takes about 45 seconds to
switch to a different folder or to access the calendar.  Dismissing a
calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. 

The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do
to speed this up a bit? 

If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful.

Thanks,
Wilson









_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Lynne July

Oh, I forgot about that - you're talking about the anti-spam rules which
they provide in an encrypted file, right??  I'm not sure what the point in
preventing "us" from seeing this.  Trend sent me an unencrypted copy of the
file (trend$rf) when I asked them; but I'm not going to ask for a new copy
every time the file is updated, and it would be convenient to verify what
they are scanning for.

Tech support did provide me with a valuable shortcut to adding items to the
Anti-Spam (header filter only).  Instead of opening the eManager interface
for each server, typing in the password 4 times, and modifying the anti-spam
filter 4 times (one on each of my 4 servers), you can edit the spamrule.txt
file on one server and copy this file to each server with a batch file.
(saves me a ton of frustration, cause I was in the habit of clicking on OK
after making a change on one server and this action abruptly exits
eManager.)

I had to turn off the content filter (which scans the entire message body)
due to the extreme performance hit this took on my primary Exchange server.


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. There's also no
complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on what you're looking for... If
you want the basics, it's just fine. I'd hesitate to call it the best (or
even place it in the top 10).

> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
> 
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block 
> SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Lynne July

I ran into that same problem - kind of defeats the purpose of the filter
when the subject contains the offensive language.  So we switched to the
MAPI version.  This has problems of it's own - it is not possible to
configure this product to scan incoming mail only.  Users attempt to save
contact or calandar items (which shouldn't be scanned) with a "banned" word
and they disappear.

A better solution (if you have the budget) is to scan on the gateway
instead.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


What version are you using?  ESE/API or  MAPI/AVAPI?.

I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually
appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to
open the message, you see the standard message "The email was blocked
according to rules." and I only have the Administrator being notified,
not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see
any notification.


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I'm using it at two clients sites.  I think that it works great.  I haven't
had any complaints.  It blocks 99.9% of the crap!  You can customize it as
well.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


Hello all,

Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you
are, thoughts - positive/negative?


Thanks - Brian


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Slow performance

2002-09-09 Thread Tener, Richard

I hear that, I have a huge public contact folder and when people save info
to it, it takes about 45 seconds to save as well.  I just told them that its
so big thats why its slow. I guess there really is no solution for a large
amount of data for a public folder.

-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance


Thanks.  I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily
used.  There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people
use it heavily.  I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when
everyone is screaming in your ear that "email is down".  

Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance

We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network
issue.  Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's.  Our server was
running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the
box.


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance

How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander
that
people access at the same time?

-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slow performance


Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users)  The machine is a
Compaq
DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN.  The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5)
and
the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. 

Calendar and folder switching is very slow.  Takes about 45 seconds to
switch to a different folder or to access the calendar.  Dismissing a
calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. 

The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can
do
to speed this up a bit? 

If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful.

Thanks,
Wilson









_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Chris Scharff

Depends entirely on your needs and budget. My placement of it was in terms
of total features offered. If the eManager product has the right features
and price for a given org, then it's certainly a valid choice.

> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:56 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
> 
> 
> What would you recommend?
> 
> I am using Trend Scanmail for AV protection on the server and 
> it works great.
> 
> 
> Brian Dugas
> MIS Director
> Summit Technical Services, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.summit-technical.com
> Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
> Fax: 401-738-9813
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:51 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
> 
> 
> There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. 
> There's also no complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on 
> what you're looking for... If you want the basics, it's just 
> fine. I'd hesitate to call it the best (or even place it in 
> the top 10).
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
> > 
> > 
> > Hello all,
> > 
> > Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block 
> SPAM? If 
> > you are, thoughts - positive/negative?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards

Antigen v6.5 by Sybari.  Gold package coming out soon, which will have
additional features.

Geoff...


-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


What would you recommend?

I am using Trend Scanmail for AV protection on the server and it works
great.


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. There's also no
complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on what you're looking for... If
you want the basics, it's just fine. I'd hesitate to call it the best (or
even place it in the top 10).

> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
> 
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If 
> you are, thoughts - positive/negative?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Slow performance

2002-09-09 Thread Varghese, Wilson

Thanks.  I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used.  There 
is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily.  I'll 
keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your 
ear that "email is down".  

Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance

We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network
issue.  Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's.  Our server was
running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the
box.


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance

How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander
that
people access at the same time?

-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slow performance


Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users)  The machine is a
Compaq
DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN.  The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5)
and
the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. 

Calendar and folder switching is very slow.  Takes about 45 seconds to
switch to a different folder or to access the calendar.  Dismissing a
calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. 

The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can
do
to speed this up a bit? 

If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful.

Thanks,
Wilson









_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Slow performance

2002-09-09 Thread Varghese, Wilson

1.5 gigs or ram.  

Wilson


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance

How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that
people access at the same time?

-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slow performance


Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users)  The machine is a Compaq
DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN.  The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and
the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. 

Calendar and folder switching is very slow.  Takes about 45 seconds to
switch to a different folder or to access the calendar.  Dismissing a
calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. 

The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do
to speed this up a bit? 

If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful.

Thanks,
Wilson









_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Brian Dugas

What would you recommend?

I am using Trend Scanmail for AV protection on the server and it works
great.


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. There's also no
complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on what you're looking for... If
you want the basics, it's just fine. I'd hesitate to call it the best (or
even place it in the top 10).

> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
> 
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block
> SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Brian Dugas

What version are you using?  ESE/API or  MAPI/AVAPI?.

I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually
appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to
open the message, you see the standard message "The email was blocked
according to rules." and I only have the Administrator being notified,
not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see
any notification.


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I'm using it at two clients sites.  I think that it works great.  I haven't
had any complaints.  It blocks 99.9% of the crap!  You can customize it as
well.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


Hello all,

Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you
are, thoughts - positive/negative?


Thanks - Brian


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Chris Scharff

There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. There's also no
complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on what you're looking for... If
you want the basics, it's just fine. I'd hesitate to call it the best (or
even place it in the top 10).

> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
> 
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block 
> SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Darrin J. Carter

I'm using it at two clients sites.  I think that it works great.  I
haven't had any complaints.  It blocks 99.9% of the crap!  You can
customize it as well.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


Hello all,

Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you
are, thoughts - positive/negative?


Thanks - Brian


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Brian Dugas

Hello all,

Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM?
If you are, thoughts - positive/negative?


Thanks - Brian


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Pop error?

2002-09-09 Thread Seitz, Peter

Got milk?

> -Original Message-
> From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:22 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Pop error?
> 
> 
> I think we all need cookies, blankets, and a nap...?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:20 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Pop error?
> 
> 
> no sorry didnt relize that...
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:10 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Pop error?
> 
> 
> Well, thank you for pointing that out so graciously.  Did you 
> notice that your email got there before mine?
> 
> Geoff...
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:03 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Pop error?
> 
> 
> I gave him that one already it didnt work.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Pop error?
> 
> 
> Mmmm.  Perhaps then Q296387 won't help him?
> 
> Geoff...
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:46 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Pop error?
> 
> 
> There is no answer on the internet for your error, I tried to 
> find it and there was no success.
> 
> Rich
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tener, Richard 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:40 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Pop error?
> 
> 
> damn i thought i got it right, I will find this error it is 
> my goal in life to provide you with the right qb article.  Sarcasm
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Pop error?
> 
> 
> um, not the right error - 
> this refers to 0x80040920 and 0x52e 
> my user managed to trigger something called 0x426 - which i 
> can't find anywhere. thanks for trying tho :) jp
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Pop error?
> 
> 
> Q296387 found it on google.com key words: 1011 POP3SVC  
> Authentication 
> 
> Rich
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:00 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Pop error?
> 
> 
> anyone know what this means? couldn't find anything on 
> support.ms.com or by googling... jeremy
> 
> 
> Event Type:   Error
> Event Source: POP3SVC
> Event Category:   Authentication 
> Event ID: 1011
> Date: 9/6/2002
> Time: 6:32:23 PM
> User: N/A
> Computer: MAILBOX
> Description:
> Authentication attempt from xx to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has 
> failed with error 0x426. 
> 
> For more information, click 
> http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 
> Data:
> : 49 02 4b 00   I.K.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailt

RE: Pop error?

2002-09-09 Thread Hutchins, Mike

Sign me the heck up for that...

-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


I think we all need cookies, blankets, and a nap...?

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


no sorry didnt relize that...

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Well, thank you for pointing that out so graciously.  Did you notice
that your email got there before mine?

Geoff...


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


I gave him that one already it didnt work.

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Mmmm.  Perhaps then Q296387 won't help him?

Geoff...


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


There is no answer on the internet for your error, I tried to find it
and there was no success.

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


damn i thought i got it right, I will find this error it is my goal in
life to provide you with the right qb article.  Sarcasm

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


um, not the right error - 
this refers to 0x80040920 and 0x52e 
my user managed to trigger something called 0x426 - which i can't find
anywhere. thanks for trying tho :) jp

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Q296387 found it on google.com key words: 1011 POP3SVC  Authentication 

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pop error?


anyone know what this means? couldn't find anything on support.ms.com or
by googling... jeremy


Event Type: Error
Event Source:   POP3SVC
Event Category: Authentication 
Event ID:   1011
Date:   9/6/2002
Time:   6:32:23 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   MAILBOX
Description:
Authentication attempt from xx to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has failed
with error 0x426. 

For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 
Data:
: 49 02 4b 00   I.K.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAI

RE: Pop error?

2002-09-09 Thread Jeremy Pinquist

Anger... fear...aggression.  The dark side of the Force are they.
I was just wondering if anyone had seen the error before...Wasn't asking people to go 
googling for me. I wouldn't have posted if the answer was obvious...
Cheers!
Jeremy

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Well, thank you for pointing that out so graciously.  Did you notice that
your email got there before mine?

Geoff...


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


I gave him that one already it didnt work.

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Mmmm.  Perhaps then Q296387 won't help him?

Geoff...


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


There is no answer on the internet for your error, I tried to find it and
there was no success.

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


damn i thought i got it right, I will find this error it is my goal in life
to provide you with the right qb article.  Sarcasm

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


um, not the right error - 
this refers to 0x80040920 and 0x52e 
my user managed to trigger something called 0x426 - which i can't find
anywhere. thanks for trying tho :) jp

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Q296387 found it on google.com key words: 1011 POP3SVC  Authentication 

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pop error?


anyone know what this means? couldn't find anything on support.ms.com or by
googling... jeremy


Event Type: Error
Event Source:   POP3SVC
Event Category: Authentication 
Event ID:   1011
Date:   9/6/2002
Time:   6:32:23 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   MAILBOX
Description:
Authentication attempt from xx to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has failed with
error 0x426. 

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 
Data:
: 49 02 4b 00   I.K.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://w

RE: Pop error?

2002-09-09 Thread Harmon, Michelle M.

I think we all need cookies, blankets, and a nap...?

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


no sorry didnt relize that...

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Well, thank you for pointing that out so graciously.  Did you notice
that your email got there before mine?

Geoff...


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


I gave him that one already it didnt work.

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Mmmm.  Perhaps then Q296387 won't help him?

Geoff...


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


There is no answer on the internet for your error, I tried to find it
and there was no success.

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


damn i thought i got it right, I will find this error it is my goal in
life to provide you with the right qb article.  Sarcasm

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


um, not the right error - 
this refers to 0x80040920 and 0x52e 
my user managed to trigger something called 0x426 - which i can't find
anywhere. thanks for trying tho :) jp

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Q296387 found it on google.com key words: 1011 POP3SVC  Authentication 

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pop error?


anyone know what this means? couldn't find anything on support.ms.com or
by googling... jeremy


Event Type: Error
Event Source:   POP3SVC
Event Category: Authentication 
Event ID:   1011
Date:   9/6/2002
Time:   6:32:23 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   MAILBOX
Description:
Authentication attempt from xx to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has failed
with error 0x426. 

For more information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 
Data:
: 49 02 4b 00   I.K.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:

RE: Pop error?

2002-09-09 Thread Tener, Richard

no sorry didnt relize that...

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Well, thank you for pointing that out so graciously.  Did you notice that
your email got there before mine?

Geoff...


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


I gave him that one already it didnt work.

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Mmmm.  Perhaps then Q296387 won't help him?

Geoff...


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


There is no answer on the internet for your error, I tried to find it and
there was no success.

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


damn i thought i got it right, I will find this error it is my goal in life
to provide you with the right qb article.  Sarcasm

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


um, not the right error - 
this refers to 0x80040920 and 0x52e 
my user managed to trigger something called 0x426 - which i can't find
anywhere. thanks for trying tho :) jp

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Q296387 found it on google.com key words: 1011 POP3SVC  Authentication 

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pop error?


anyone know what this means? couldn't find anything on support.ms.com or by
googling... jeremy


Event Type: Error
Event Source:   POP3SVC
Event Category: Authentication 
Event ID:   1011
Date:   9/6/2002
Time:   6:32:23 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   MAILBOX
Description:
Authentication attempt from xx to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has failed with
error 0x426. 

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 
Data:
: 49 02 4b 00   I.K.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting F

RE: Pop error?

2002-09-09 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards

Well, thank you for pointing that out so graciously.  Did you notice that
your email got there before mine?

Geoff...


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


I gave him that one already it didnt work.

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Mmmm.  Perhaps then Q296387 won't help him?

Geoff...


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


There is no answer on the internet for your error, I tried to find it and
there was no success.

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


damn i thought i got it right, I will find this error it is my goal in life
to provide you with the right qb article.  Sarcasm

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


um, not the right error - 
this refers to 0x80040920 and 0x52e 
my user managed to trigger something called 0x426 - which i can't find
anywhere. thanks for trying tho :) jp

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Q296387 found it on google.com key words: 1011 POP3SVC  Authentication 

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pop error?


anyone know what this means? couldn't find anything on support.ms.com or by
googling... jeremy


Event Type: Error
Event Source:   POP3SVC
Event Category: Authentication 
Event ID:   1011
Date:   9/6/2002
Time:   6:32:23 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   MAILBOX
Description:
Authentication attempt from xx to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has failed with
error 0x426. 

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 
Data:
: 49 02 4b 00   I.K.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Pop error?

2002-09-09 Thread Tener, Richard

I gave him that one already it didnt work.

-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Mmmm.  Perhaps then Q296387 won't help him?

Geoff...


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


There is no answer on the internet for your error, I tried to find it and
there was no success.

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


damn i thought i got it right, I will find this error it is my goal in life
to provide you with the right qb article.  Sarcasm

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


um, not the right error - 
this refers to 0x80040920 and 0x52e 
my user managed to trigger something called 0x426 - which i can't find
anywhere. thanks for trying tho :) jp

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Q296387 found it on google.com key words: 1011 POP3SVC  Authentication 

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pop error?


anyone know what this means? couldn't find anything on support.ms.com or by
googling... jeremy


Event Type: Error
Event Source:   POP3SVC
Event Category: Authentication 
Event ID:   1011
Date:   9/6/2002
Time:   6:32:23 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   MAILBOX
Description:
Authentication attempt from xx to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has failed with
error 0x426. 

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 
Data:
: 49 02 4b 00   I.K.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Pop error?

2002-09-09 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards

Mmmm.  Perhaps then Q296387 won't help him?

Geoff...


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


There is no answer on the internet for your error, I tried to find it and
there was no success.

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


damn i thought i got it right, I will find this error it is my goal in life
to provide you with the right qb article.  Sarcasm

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


um, not the right error - 
this refers to 0x80040920 and 0x52e 
my user managed to trigger something called 0x426 - which i can't find
anywhere. thanks for trying tho :) jp

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Q296387 found it on google.com key words: 1011 POP3SVC  Authentication 

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pop error?


anyone know what this means? couldn't find anything on support.ms.com or by
googling... jeremy


Event Type: Error
Event Source:   POP3SVC
Event Category: Authentication 
Event ID:   1011
Date:   9/6/2002
Time:   6:32:23 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   MAILBOX
Description:
Authentication attempt from xx to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has failed with
error 0x426. 

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 
Data:
: 49 02 4b 00   I.K.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Slow performance

2002-09-09 Thread Gonzalez, Alex

We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network
issue.  Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's.  Our server was
running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the
box.


-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slow performance

How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander
that
people access at the same time?

-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slow performance


Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users)  The machine is a
Compaq
DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN.  The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5)
and
the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition.  

Calendar and folder switching is very slow.  Takes about 45 seconds to
switch to a different folder or to access the calendar.  Dismissing a
calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes.  

The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can
do
to speed this up a bit?  

If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful.

Thanks, 
Wilson









_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Slow performance

2002-09-09 Thread Chris Scharff

Perfmon will be your friend initially. There's no reason this should be slow
offhand, so pinpointing the bottleneck may take a bit of poking about.

> -Original Message-
> From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:45 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Slow performance
> 
> 
> Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users)  The 
> machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN.  The 
> store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index 
> files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition.  
> 
> Calendar and folder switching is very slow.  Takes about 45 
> seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the 
> calendar.  Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook 
> for several minutes.  
> 
> The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything 
> else I can do to speed this up a bit?  
> 
> If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful.
> 
> Thanks, 
> Wilson
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Slow performance

2002-09-09 Thread Tener, Richard

How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that
people access at the same time?

-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slow performance


Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users)  The machine is a Compaq
DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN.  The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and
the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition.  

Calendar and folder switching is very slow.  Takes about 45 seconds to
switch to a different folder or to access the calendar.  Dismissing a
calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes.  

The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do
to speed this up a bit?  

If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful.

Thanks, 
Wilson









_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OWA Password expiration

2002-09-09 Thread Tener, Richard

I had to do this as well i think the cause was when i reapplied sp4 for
exchange.

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Password expiration



  I recall that I had to do this as well.  Never found out what the root
cause was.



  Jim 

-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Password expiration


You are correct and thank you for the response. I had already modified the
constant.inc file, but users were still getting the expiration message.
Modifying the root.asp took care of it. Thanks everyone for responding.

> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:00 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA Password expiration
> 
> 
> 
>   It's definetely in Technet. I have to look it up every time 
> I fiddle with the 2ndary NT server here. try searching all 
> contents for "password will expire in 0 days" 
> 
> or Q262902 I think is the one you want.
> 
>  Jim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:50 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OWA Password expiration
> 
> 
> Forgive me for not paying attention, but I know this was just 
> on the list recently, but I have moved my OWA server to 
> another server, and now the users are getting the "password 
> will expire in 0 days" message. I've searched technet and I 
> couldn't find an answer. How can I get rid of this message?
> 
> Peter Seitz 
> Cubic Corporation
> Systems Analyst
> San Diego, Ca. 92123
> (858) 505-2724
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: SMTP Services Ex. 5.5 & Ex2000

2002-09-09 Thread Pillai, Raj

Yes you have to manually create the smtp conector on the 2000 server and
configure it,if you want to route your internet mail thru' this server.
You can either remove the smtp address space on the exchange 55 IMC or
give it a higher value than the Exchange 2000 Server(lower the value,
higher the priority) . 
Choose the exch2000 server as the routing server and recalculate.

Hope this helps.

-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP Services Ex. 5.5 & Ex2000


I'm following Q316886 article page 7.. on "Rerouting Outgoing Internel
E-Mail through the Ex2000 Server".  Say to remove the "SMTP Address
Space"
and then "Recalculate Routing".   When I remove the SMTP Address on the
5.5
server.. Do I need to manually 
configure the SMTP Connector in Ex.2000 (ie, Q265293)?At the current
time, in the "Routing Group container" under ex2000 it shows the
Internet
Email connector from Ex5.5.  

If I do need to configure a new smtp connector in ex.2000, Do I use one
of
my front-end servers as "Local Bridgeheads or
since I'm using a "virtual server" for load balancing, do I use that
instead?



Ron

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Pop error?

2002-09-09 Thread Tener, Richard

There is no answer on the internet for your error, I tried to find it and
there was no success.

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


damn i thought i got it right, I will find this error it is my goal in life
to provide you with the right qb article.  Sarcasm

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


um, not the right error - 
this refers to 0x80040920 and 0x52e 
my user managed to trigger something called 0x426 - which i can't find
anywhere.
thanks for trying tho :)
jp

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Q296387 found it on google.com key words: 1011 POP3SVC  Authentication 

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pop error?


anyone know what this means? couldn't find anything on support.ms.com or by
googling...
jeremy


Event Type: Error
Event Source:   POP3SVC
Event Category: Authentication 
Event ID:   1011
Date:   9/6/2002
Time:   6:32:23 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   MAILBOX
Description:
Authentication attempt from xx to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has failed with
error 0x426. 

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 
Data:
: 49 02 4b 00   I.K.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Slow performance

2002-09-09 Thread Varghese, Wilson

Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users)  The machine is a Compaq DL380 
hooked up to a Compaq SAN.  The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and 
index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition.  

Calendar and folder switching is very slow.  Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a 
different folder or to access the calendar.  Dismissing a calendar event can lock up 
outlook for several minutes.  

The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed 
this up a bit?  

If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful.

Thanks, 
Wilson









_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: custom NDR?

2002-09-09 Thread Ali Wilkes (IT)

David,

New procedure.

Check date.  If date < $TODAY, then DELETE message.

-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Monday, September 09, 2002 8:08 AM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: custom NDR?
Subject: RE: custom NDR?


(digital camera sales surge noted)

(:=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?


Thank you, thank you, I believe I'll be modelling said pink sundresses
in a
hotel bar at MEC...

-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 00:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?


Brilliant. Verbally succinct, dead on target. Rapier wit.

I rate this answer at 5 pink sundresses. Well done, Gary. What are your
plans for following up on this critical success?

(:=

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?


Got education?  Learn the difference between "u" and "you".

-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 16:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?


Got money ?  Get MS to consult for u.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes
(IT)
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: custom NDR?


OK I'm looking for info, but in the meantime, in both/either 5.5 or 2k
can
you make custom NDR's?  or change the text of current ones?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Pop error?

2002-09-09 Thread Tener, Richard

damn i thought i got it right, I will find this error it is my goal in life
to provide you with the right qb article.  Sarcasm

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


um, not the right error - 
this refers to 0x80040920 and 0x52e 
my user managed to trigger something called 0x426 - which i can't find
anywhere.
thanks for trying tho :)
jp

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Q296387 found it on google.com key words: 1011 POP3SVC  Authentication 

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pop error?


anyone know what this means? couldn't find anything on support.ms.com or by
googling...
jeremy


Event Type: Error
Event Source:   POP3SVC
Event Category: Authentication 
Event ID:   1011
Date:   9/6/2002
Time:   6:32:23 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   MAILBOX
Description:
Authentication attempt from xx to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has failed with
error 0x426. 

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 
Data:
: 49 02 4b 00   I.K.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Jewish Haiku

2002-09-09 Thread Ali Wilkes (IT)

>>using the word niggardly in the appropriate context

You live in Ypsi?

;)

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Saturday, September 07, 2002 9:20 PM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: Jewish Haiku
Subject: RE: Jewish Haiku


5 years ago, I would have been shocked and amazed that anyone could be
offended by using the word niggardly in the appropriate context. Go
figure.


Since the points here have the same value as those in 'Whose line is it
anyway' everyone is of course welcome to draw their own conclusions.

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT)
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/7/2002 5:33 PM
Subject: RE: Jewish Haiku

I don't think anyone I know (that is jewish) would take offense to this.

Not even the few orthodox I know.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: E2K: OUTLOOK "Can't open this item" SP3 bug?

2002-09-09 Thread Ali Wilkes (IT)

This is the exact same error I see with many versions of exchange when
NAI Groupshield has taken a "dump".

Stopping and starting groupshield helps, but usually the sender has to
resend the e-mail after.

I would suggest this is a problem with Scanmail, not sp3.

Did you check with TM to see if they updated their software for SP3?

-Original Message-
From: Young, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:19 PM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: E2K: OUTLOOK "Can't open this item" SP3 bug?
Subject: RE: E2K: OUTLOOK "Can't open this item" SP3 bug?


Brent,

If you stop Scanmail can you read the mails then or do you still have
the
problem? Apologies if you've already tried this.
regards

Phil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OWA Password expiration

2002-09-09 Thread Jim Helfer


  I recall that I had to do this as well.  Never found out what the root
cause was.



  Jim 

-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Password expiration


You are correct and thank you for the response. I had already modified the
constant.inc file, but users were still getting the expiration message.
Modifying the root.asp took care of it. Thanks everyone for responding.

> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:00 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA Password expiration
> 
> 
> 
>   It's definetely in Technet. I have to look it up every time 
> I fiddle with the 2ndary NT server here. try searching all 
> contents for "password will expire in 0 days" 
> 
> or Q262902 I think is the one you want.
> 
>  Jim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:50 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OWA Password expiration
> 
> 
> Forgive me for not paying attention, but I know this was just 
> on the list recently, but I have moved my OWA server to 
> another server, and now the users are getting the "password 
> will expire in 0 days" message. I've searched technet and I 
> couldn't find an answer. How can I get rid of this message?
> 
> Peter Seitz 
> Cubic Corporation
> Systems Analyst
> San Diego, Ca. 92123
> (858) 505-2724
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Pop error?

2002-09-09 Thread Jeremy Pinquist

um, not the right error - 
this refers to 0x80040920 and 0x52e 
my user managed to trigger something called 0x426 - which i can't find anywhere.
thanks for trying tho :)
jp

-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pop error?


Q296387 found it on google.com key words: 1011 POP3SVC  Authentication 

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pop error?


anyone know what this means? couldn't find anything on support.ms.com or by
googling...
jeremy


Event Type: Error
Event Source:   POP3SVC
Event Category: Authentication 
Event ID:   1011
Date:   9/6/2002
Time:   6:32:23 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   MAILBOX
Description:
Authentication attempt from xx to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has failed with
error 0x426. 

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 
Data:
: 49 02 4b 00   I.K.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Shortcut for Public Folders

2002-09-09 Thread Lynne July

It's also possible to eliminate the %20 if you enclose the string in angle
brackets.  Like so...



Lynne

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcut for Public Folders


After re-reading you post, you may be looking for the url style of linking a
public folders.  It would take the format of 

outlook://Public%20Folders/All%20Public%20Folders/myfoldername

Aaron


-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Shortcut for Public Folders


EX 55/SP4

Pardon me if this has been asked before, but I didn't find information on
Technet or the archives on how to do this: Creating shortcut/link for a
specific Public Folder and sending it to the user in an email. I can see the
path when I right-click on the folder and click Properties, but that's not 
the full path.

Thanks

--Alex Alborzfard, MCSE

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Removing Server from Admin Group

2002-09-09 Thread Gonzalez, Alex

Yes but its going to become an SMS Front end server.  I have already built the 
replacement for this one with a different name.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior System Administrator
Handleman Company
(248) 362-4400 ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing Server from Admin Group

Are you planning to resinstall Exchange on this server?[1] 


[1] Idle curiousity, I'm not actually planning on contributing much since
the initial question defies any useful answer.

> -Original Message-
> From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:05 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Removing Server from Admin Group
> 
> 
> No the server crashed and I had to rebuild it.  
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:58 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Removing Server from Admin Group
> 
> Did you try removing Exchange from that server from 
> add/remove programs?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:23 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Removing Server from Admin Group
> 
> 
> I am currently running E2K SP3 and I went to remove one of 
> the Servers and asked if I was sure I clicked yes, the screen 
> froze, and then came back, but the Server was still there.  I 
> tried to remove from other Exchange Servers as well and it 
> still wont go away.  Any idea's?
> 
> Thank you,
>  
> Alex Gonzalez
> Senior System Administrator
> Handleman Company
> (248) 362-4400 ext. 4914

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



SMTP Services Ex. 5.5 & Ex2000

2002-09-09 Thread Pennell, Ronald B.

I'm following Q316886 article page 7.. on "Rerouting Outgoing Internel
E-Mail through the Ex2000 Server".  Say to remove the "SMTP Address Space"
and then "Recalculate Routing".   When I remove the SMTP Address on the 5.5
server.. Do I need to manually 
configure the SMTP Connector in Ex.2000 (ie, Q265293)?At the current
time, in the "Routing Group container" under ex2000 it shows the Internet
Email connector from Ex5.5.  

If I do need to configure a new smtp connector in ex.2000, Do I use one of
my front-end servers as "Local Bridgeheads or
since I'm using a "virtual server" for load balancing, do I use that
instead?



Ron

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Removing Server from Admin Group

2002-09-09 Thread Gonzalez, Alex

Well funny is this.  I went to do that and it was gone.  The last time I checked was 
about an hour ago and it was still there.  Oh well.  Thanks for the useful tip though.

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior System Administrator
Handleman Company
(248) 362-4400 ext. 4914

-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing Server from Admin Group

In that case, you can try removing it from ADSI edit.  
Configuration-->services-->exchange-->org name-->administrative group-->storage 
group-->and your server will be there.  Be careful, if you remove the wrong thing it 
could be very uncool.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing Server from Admin Group


No the server crashed and I had to rebuild it.  


-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing Server from Admin Group

Did you try removing Exchange from that server from add/remove programs?

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing Server from Admin Group


I am currently running E2K SP3 and I went to remove one of the Servers and asked if I 
was sure I clicked yes, the screen froze, and then came back, but the Server was still 
there.  I tried to remove from other Exchange Servers as well and it still wont go 
away.  Any idea's?

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior System Administrator
Handleman Company
(248) 362-4400 ext. 4914


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Removing Server from Admin Group

2002-09-09 Thread Chris Scharff

Are you planning to resinstall Exchange on this server?[1] 


[1] Idle curiousity, I'm not actually planning on contributing much since
the initial question defies any useful answer.

> -Original Message-
> From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:05 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Removing Server from Admin Group
> 
> 
> No the server crashed and I had to rebuild it.  
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:58 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Removing Server from Admin Group
> 
> Did you try removing Exchange from that server from 
> add/remove programs?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:23 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Removing Server from Admin Group
> 
> 
> I am currently running E2K SP3 and I went to remove one of 
> the Servers and asked if I was sure I clicked yes, the screen 
> froze, and then came back, but the Server was still there.  I 
> tried to remove from other Exchange Servers as well and it 
> still wont go away.  Any idea's?
> 
> Thank you,
>  
> Alex Gonzalez
> Senior System Administrator
> Handleman Company
> (248) 362-4400 ext. 4914

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Pop error?

2002-09-09 Thread Tener, Richard

Q296387 found it on google.com key words: 1011 POP3SVC  Authentication 

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pop error?


anyone know what this means? couldn't find anything on support.ms.com or by
googling...
jeremy


Event Type: Error
Event Source:   POP3SVC
Event Category: Authentication 
Event ID:   1011
Date:   9/6/2002
Time:   6:32:23 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   MAILBOX
Description:
Authentication attempt from xx to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has failed with
error 0x426. 

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 
Data:
: 49 02 4b 00   I.K.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Shortcut for Public Folders

2002-09-09 Thread Alex Alborzfard

Yes that's what I was looking for. 
Thanks

Alex Alborzfard, MCSE

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcut for Public Folders


After re-reading you post, you may be looking for the url style of linking a
public folders.  It would take the format of 

outlook://Public%20Folders/All%20Public%20Folders/myfoldername

Aaron


-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Shortcut for Public Folders


EX 55/SP4

Pardon me if this has been asked before, but I didn't find information on
Technet or the archives on how to do this: Creating shortcut/link for a
specific Public Folder and sending it to the user in an email. I can see the
path when I right-click on the folder and click Properties, but that's not 
the full path.

Thanks

--Alex Alborzfard, MCSE

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Removing Server from Admin Group

2002-09-09 Thread Harmon, Michelle M.

In that case, you can try removing it from ADSI edit.  
Configuration-->services-->exchange-->org name-->administrative group-->storage 
group-->and your server will be there.  Be careful, if you remove the wrong thing it 
could be very uncool.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing Server from Admin Group


No the server crashed and I had to rebuild it.  


-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing Server from Admin Group

Did you try removing Exchange from that server from add/remove programs?

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing Server from Admin Group


I am currently running E2K SP3 and I went to remove one of the Servers and asked if I 
was sure I clicked yes, the screen froze, and then came back, but the Server was still 
there.  I tried to remove from other Exchange Servers as well and it still wont go 
away.  Any idea's?

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior System Administrator
Handleman Company
(248) 362-4400 ext. 4914


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Removing Server from Admin Group

2002-09-09 Thread Gonzalez, Alex

No the server crashed and I had to rebuild it.  


-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing Server from Admin Group

Did you try removing Exchange from that server from add/remove programs?

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing Server from Admin Group


I am currently running E2K SP3 and I went to remove one of the Servers and asked if I 
was sure I clicked yes, the screen froze, and then came back, but the Server was still 
there.  I tried to remove from other Exchange Servers as well and it still wont go 
away.  Any idea's?

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior System Administrator
Handleman Company
(248) 362-4400 ext. 4914


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Pop error?

2002-09-09 Thread Jeremy Pinquist

anyone know what this means? couldn't find anything on support.ms.com or by googling...
jeremy


Event Type: Error
Event Source:   POP3SVC
Event Category: Authentication 
Event ID:   1011
Date:   9/6/2002
Time:   6:32:23 PM
User:   N/A
Computer:   MAILBOX
Description:
Authentication attempt from xx to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has failed with error 0x426. 

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 
Data:
: 49 02 4b 00   I.K.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Removing Server from Admin Group

2002-09-09 Thread Harmon, Michelle M.

Did you try removing Exchange from that server from add/remove programs?

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing Server from Admin Group


I am currently running E2K SP3 and I went to remove one of the Servers and asked if I 
was sure I clicked yes, the screen froze, and then came back, but the Server was still 
there.  I tried to remove from other Exchange Servers as well and it still wont go 
away.  Any idea's?

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior System Administrator
Handleman Company
(248) 362-4400 ext. 4914


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OWA Password expiration

2002-09-09 Thread Seitz, Peter

You are correct and thank you for the response. I had already modified the
constant.inc file, but users were still getting the expiration message.
Modifying the root.asp took care of it. Thanks everyone for responding.

> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:00 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: OWA Password expiration
> 
> 
> 
>   It's definetely in Technet. I have to look it up every time 
> I fiddle with the 2ndary NT server here. try searching all 
> contents for "password will expire in 0 days" 
> 
> or Q262902 I think is the one you want.
> 
>  Jim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:50 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OWA Password expiration
> 
> 
> Forgive me for not paying attention, but I know this was just 
> on the list recently, but I have moved my OWA server to 
> another server, and now the users are getting the "password 
> will expire in 0 days" message. I've searched technet and I 
> couldn't find an answer. How can I get rid of this message?
> 
> Peter Seitz 
> Cubic Corporation
> Systems Analyst
> San Diego, Ca. 92123
> (858) 505-2724
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Removing Server from Admin Group

2002-09-09 Thread Gonzalez, Alex

I am currently running E2K SP3 and I went to remove one of the Servers and asked if I 
was sure I clicked yes, the screen froze, and then came back, but the Server was still 
there.  I tried to remove from other Exchange Servers as well and it still wont go 
away.  Any idea's?

Thank you,
 
Alex Gonzalez
Senior System Administrator
Handleman Company
(248) 362-4400 ext. 4914


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Shortcut for Public Folders

2002-09-09 Thread Aaron Brasslett

After re-reading you post, you may be looking for the url style of linking a
public folders.  It would take the format of 

outlook://Public%20Folders/All%20Public%20Folders/myfoldername

Aaron


-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Shortcut for Public Folders


EX 55/SP4

Pardon me if this has been asked before, but I didn't find information on
Technet or the archives on how to do this: Creating shortcut/link for a
specific Public Folder and sending it to the user in an email. I can see the
path when I right-click on the folder and click Properties, but that's not 
the full path.

Thanks

--Alex Alborzfard, MCSE

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Shortcut for Public Folders

2002-09-09 Thread Alex Alborzfard


This works but I'd rather type the UNC path.
Sorry I should've been more specific!

--Alex Alborzfard, MCSE

-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcut for Public Folders


This may be client dependant.. But this works for OL 2000 and 2002.

>From the folder list drag and drop the folder into an email body and it will
create a file with the extension xnk.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Shortcut for Public Folders


EX 55/SP4

Pardon me if this has been asked before, but I didn't find information on
Technet or the archives on how to do this: Creating shortcut/link for a
specific Public Folder and sending it to the user in an email. I can see the
path when I right-click on the folder and click Properties, but that's not 
the full path.

Thanks

--Alex Alborzfard, MCSE

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Shortcut for Public Folders

2002-09-09 Thread Aaron Brasslett

This may be client dependant.. But this works for OL 2000 and 2002.

>From the folder list drag and drop the folder into an email body and it will
create a file with the extension xnk.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Shortcut for Public Folders


EX 55/SP4

Pardon me if this has been asked before, but I didn't find information on
Technet or the archives on how to do this: Creating shortcut/link for a
specific Public Folder and sending it to the user in an email. I can see the
path when I right-click on the folder and click Properties, but that's not 
the full path.

Thanks

--Alex Alborzfard, MCSE

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Shortcut for Public Folders

2002-09-09 Thread Alex Alborzfard

EX 55/SP4

Pardon me if this has been asked before, but I didn't find information on
Technet
or the archives on how to do this:
Creating shortcut/link for a specific Public Folder and sending it to the
user in an email.
I can see the path when I right-click on the folder and click Properties,
but that's not 
the full path.

Thanks

--Alex Alborzfard, MCSE

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OWA Password expiration

2002-09-09 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards

You might try Q262902.

Geoff...


-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Password expiration


Forgive me for not paying attention, but I know this was just on the list
recently, but I have moved my OWA server to another server, and now the
users are getting the "password will expire in 0 days" message. I've
searched technet and I couldn't find an answer. How can I get rid of this
message?

Peter Seitz 
Cubic Corporation
Systems Analyst
San Diego, Ca. 92123
(858) 505-2724

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OWA Password expiration

2002-09-09 Thread Slinger, Gary

Change their passwords?

OK, I'll play nice - Q295067, 262902, 190433, 236909 or 238444.  You figure
out which one is right - I don't want to.

Observations: You know it was asked recently, but you don't have messages
you could have searched?  Or the archives?  And, while I can draw an
assumption that you're running 5.5 from "moved OWA server", it would have
helped for you to confirm that, and the SP - I know at least one of the
above Q's is SP specific.



-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 17:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Password expiration


Forgive me for not paying attention, but I know this was just on the list
recently, but I have moved my OWA server to another server, and now the
users are getting the "password will expire in 0 days" message. I've
searched technet and I couldn't find an answer. How can I get rid of this
message?

Peter Seitz 
Cubic Corporation
Systems Analyst
San Diego, Ca. 92123
(858) 505-2724

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OWA Password expiration

2002-09-09 Thread Stevens, Dave

Q262902

-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Password expiration


Forgive me for not paying attention, but I know this was just on the list
recently, but I have moved my OWA server to another server, and now the
users are getting the "password will expire in 0 days" message. I've
searched technet and I couldn't find an answer. How can I get rid of this
message?

Peter Seitz 
Cubic Corporation
Systems Analyst
San Diego, Ca. 92123
(858) 505-2724

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OWA Password expiration

2002-09-09 Thread Jim Helfer


  It's definetely in Technet. I have to look it up every time I fiddle with
the 2ndary NT server here. try searching all contents for "password will
expire in 0 days" 

or Q262902 I think is the one you want.

 Jim




-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Password expiration


Forgive me for not paying attention, but I know this was just on the list
recently, but I have moved my OWA server to another server, and now the
users are getting the "password will expire in 0 days" message. I've
searched technet and I couldn't find an answer. How can I get rid of this
message?

Peter Seitz 
Cubic Corporation
Systems Analyst
San Diego, Ca. 92123
(858) 505-2724

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OWA Password expiration

2002-09-09 Thread Lynne July

See Q190433

-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Password expiration


Forgive me for not paying attention, but I know this was just on the list
recently, but I have moved my OWA server to another server, and now the
users are getting the "password will expire in 0 days" message. I've
searched technet and I couldn't find an answer. How can I get rid of this
message?

Peter Seitz 
Cubic Corporation
Systems Analyst
San Diego, Ca. 92123
(858) 505-2724

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



OWA Password expiration

2002-09-09 Thread Seitz, Peter

Forgive me for not paying attention, but I know this was just on the list
recently, but I have moved my OWA server to another server, and now the
users are getting the "password will expire in 0 days" message. I've
searched technet and I couldn't find an answer. How can I get rid of this
message?

Peter Seitz 
Cubic Corporation
Systems Analyst
San Diego, Ca. 92123
(858) 505-2724

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: BCC problems in Public Folders

2002-09-09 Thread Aaron Brasslett

I bet those message are not from his "sent items" folder.  I've seen users
BCC themselves so it would be in their inbox.  If he moved that email he
_received_ it would not have any BCC info.

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: BCC problems in Public Folders


He's using outlook 2002/Exchange 2000. I also tried it for myself, it worked
for me to. He's a "troubled" user so I really have no idea what he did. Hell
he could be using an etech-a-sketch and trying to check his e-mail



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: BCC problems in Public Folders


Hmmm... This works for me.  I moved an email from my sent items that had a
bcc address in it to a public folder and I still can see who I bcc'ed.

What version out Outlook/Exchange?  I am using 2002/5.5SP4

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: BCC problems in Public Folders


My boss ended up putting some messages into a public folder that he has some
BCC address in. Now he can't see who he sent them to. Is there anyway to see
the info in the BCC field?

-Chris


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

2002-09-09 Thread Tener, Richard

I know how to fix it joe just remove exchange.   HaHa (simpsons), just
messing with you (Joe):)

Rich

-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


Joe, I really don't think there IS an answer to that question.  In that
case, "try it yourself if you want to know" really is an acceptable
answer.  Sometimes, the documentation just doesn't exist.

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


By asking question and accepting answers with no content? I applaud you.
But unfortunately, not everyone works that way.


-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

Yes, I would have.  That's the way I learned Exchange.  :)

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


Michelle,

I am sorry to hear about this, but I am sure if it is out there
I will find it. It will just take me longer than if someone opted to
help me.

It doesn't surprise me that you took the time to tell me this
though, your reputation precedes you.

Just curious...how would you have dealt with the situation? If
someone told you to just try it, would you have just said "OK"?

Thanks,
Joe Rojas

-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

Joe:

I know of *at least* two ex-PSS people who read this list, and a few
current MS employees who read the list as well.  Perhaps one of them
would have helped you had you not responded in such a manner.

Maybe one of them was even looking for an answer when your reply came
across the wire.

The tone of your replies, though, were such that you'll never know.

Love 'n' kisses,

-Michelle

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

<>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: urgent backup problem

2002-09-09 Thread Chris Quinn

In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine
with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job to
do an Exchange backup to the disk.  Installing the admin program makes NT
Backup Exchange aware

Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and
easier and more reliable than copying the files manually

Chris Quinn
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium 

-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: urgent backup problem


hi all, 
can anyone help me with the following scenario:

sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4
tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it. However,
as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is knackered
and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent backup
of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning and
also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no
tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy the
relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive.  However, I
don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but
haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had
error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy or
should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my
programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non existent...
Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thank you very much Rob

Support Analyst
T.K.C. Sales Ltd.
5 Ashmead Industrial Estate
Keynsham
Bristol
BS31 1TZ
UK
Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302



intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: E2K: OUTLOOK "Can't open this item" SP3 bug?

2002-09-09 Thread Young, Phil

Brent,

If you stop Scanmail can you read the mails then or do you still have the
problem? Apologies if you've already tried this.
regards

Phil

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: BCC problems in Public Folders

2002-09-09 Thread Christopher Hummert

He's using outlook 2002/Exchange 2000. I also tried it for myself, it
worked for me to. He's a "troubled" user so I really have no idea what
he did. Hell he could be using an etech-a-sketch and trying to check his
e-mail



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: BCC problems in Public Folders


Hmmm... This works for me.  I moved an email from my sent items that had
a bcc address in it to a public folder and I still can see who I bcc'ed.

What version out Outlook/Exchange?  I am using 2002/5.5SP4

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: BCC problems in Public Folders


My boss ended up putting some messages into a public folder that he has
some BCC address in. Now he can't see who he sent them to. Is there
anyway to see the info in the BCC field?

-Chris


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: urgent backup problem

2002-09-09 Thread Dflorea

What syntax did you use to stop the services?  It's more likely your
problem was there than with your copy commands.  If you check the
archives, I think you'll find at least a couple of set of instructions
on batch files which will stop all the services.

Good luck on your tape drive...

David

-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 8:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: urgent backup problem


hi all, 
can anyone help me with the following scenario:

sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4
tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it.
However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really
is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been
no decent backup of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and
recovery planning and also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of
useful but as have no tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop
the services and copy the relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a
network drive.  However, I don't think I've got the syntax right for
xcopy (would include it but haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled
it to run at 23.00 but had error saying did not start - not sure why
yet. Should I be using xcopy or should I use plain copy? Has anyone got
any tips or syntax for copy - my programming skills (yes even for batch
files) are virtually non existent... Am I missing anything? Could anyone
replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you very much Rob

Support Analyst
T.K.C. Sales Ltd.
5 Ashmead Industrial Estate
Keynsham
Bristol
BS31 1TZ
UK
Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302



intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

2002-09-09 Thread Harmon, Michelle M.

Joe, I really don't think there IS an answer to that question.  In that
case, "try it yourself if you want to know" really is an acceptable
answer.  Sometimes, the documentation just doesn't exist.

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


By asking question and accepting answers with no content? I applaud you.
But unfortunately, not everyone works that way.


-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

Yes, I would have.  That's the way I learned Exchange.  :)

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


Michelle,

I am sorry to hear about this, but I am sure if it is out there
I will find it. It will just take me longer than if someone opted to
help me.

It doesn't surprise me that you took the time to tell me this
though, your reputation precedes you.

Just curious...how would you have dealt with the situation? If
someone told you to just try it, would you have just said "OK"?

Thanks,
Joe Rojas

-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

Joe:

I know of *at least* two ex-PSS people who read this list, and a few
current MS employees who read the list as well.  Perhaps one of them
would have helped you had you not responded in such a manner.

Maybe one of them was even looking for an answer when your reply came
across the wire.

The tone of your replies, though, were such that you'll never know.

Love 'n' kisses,

-Michelle

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

<>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

2002-09-09 Thread Joe Rojas

By asking question and accepting answers with no content? I applaud you. But
unfortunately, not everyone works that way.


-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

Yes, I would have.  That's the way I learned Exchange.  :)

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


Michelle,

I am sorry to hear about this, but I am sure if it is out there
I will find it. It will just take me longer than if someone opted to
help me.

It doesn't surprise me that you took the time to tell me this
though, your reputation precedes you.

Just curious...how would you have dealt with the situation? If
someone told you to just try it, would you have just said "OK"?

Thanks,
Joe Rojas

-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

Joe:

I know of *at least* two ex-PSS people who read this list, and a few
current MS employees who read the list as well.  Perhaps one of them
would have helped you had you not responded in such a manner.

Maybe one of them was even looking for an answer when your reply came
across the wire.

The tone of your replies, though, were such that you'll never know.

Love 'n' kisses,

-Michelle

-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

<>

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

2002-09-09 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards

I can attest for Chris asking *the odd technical questions in this forum and
others*[1] as I have answered them.  I don't remember what it was he asked,
but he was grateful.[1][2]

Geoff...
[1]  Not remembering comes with age.  :)
[2]  I an not even going to go anywhere near the spanking part!


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)


My conclusion is that you should work on your skills related to asking a
technical question. No, one doesn't need to know the answer to a question to
be able to formulate a question about it. Sometimes that even hinders the
process. I'm still learning about Exchange daily, and still ask the odd
technical question in this forum and others. Some of them could probably be
phrased better, and on occasion I've even been spanked for one reason or
another.[1]

Since you asked, let's look at your question and see how it could have been
improved:

> I am trying to find some kind of documentation on the 
> different levels of logging in the 'diagnostics logging' tab of the 
> IMC (Exchange 5.5). I am trying to find out what is logged at the 
> different levels for all the categories. (Initialization/Termination, 
> Addressing, Message Transfer, SMTP Interface Events, Internal 
> Processing, SMTP Protocol Log, and Message
> Archival)

My revised version:

I've been looking on the web and the Exchange help files for
documentation[2] of the different levels of logging related to the
diagnostics tab of the IMC (Exchange 5.5)[3]. Does anyone know if there is a
document on the web[4] which details what is logged at the different levels?
(Init  Archival) If so, could you please provide a link?[6]

/Some/ of what you are looking for is documented, but a complete and
comprehensive document is not available. In response to the above question
you might have gotten links to some of the information along with a
suggestion to test for the rest. If /I/ were asking the question, I might
have included information on why I was looking for the information. General
curiosity isn't one of the reasons I generally do Exchange research though
unfortunately. However, including that information would help prevent
someone from pondering why you wanted it and perhaps presenting other
peripheral (and incorrect) solutions based on assumptions the reader made. 

[1] I am still grateful to a firewall admin of mine who made me read RFC821
before he's answer anymore of my SMTP related questions. The bastard. [2]
Shows what you have already done in this regard. Saves you (hopefully) from
receiving an answer of STFW or RTFM in the event you simply missed it. [3]
You included the Exchange version and specific tab which was nice. [4] A
query for pre-existing documentation.[5] [5] Since I've seen people ask
questions where the underlying assumption was someone will whip up a 12 page
treatise on a subject, it's a nice touch. [6] Saves you from someone simply
answering "yes" to the question "Does anyone know.."

> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:25 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
> 
> 
> So what is your conclusion Chris? Should I first learn everything I 
> need to know before I ask a question so that my question can be 
> accurately written? Wouldn't that mean that I wouldn't have to ask the 
> question? I am confused. That question was properly phrase relative to 
> my knowledge of Exchange. I can see how to you it would be poorly 
> phrase but you don't seem to remember that we all start out as 
> "newbies" to exchange, even you. How did you learn? Did you do
> everything on your own? If you did, I admire that. I am more 
> likely to bet that you asked question along the way. Just 
> because your knowledge of Exchange is where I want to get my 
> knowledge level doesn't mean that you have to look down on 
> the little people...or does it? I wouldn't know because I 
> haven't got there yet...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: BCC problems in Public Folders

2002-09-09 Thread Aaron Brasslett

Hmmm... This works for me.  I moved an email from my sent items that had a
bcc address in it to a public folder and I still can see who I bcc'ed.

What version out Outlook/Exchange?  I am using 2002/5.5SP4

Aaron

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: BCC problems in Public Folders


My boss ended up putting some messages into a public folder that he has some
BCC address in. Now he can't see who he sent them to. Is there anyway to see
the info in the BCC field?

-Chris


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

2002-09-09 Thread Joe Rojas

Chris,

Thank you very much for supplying this information for me. I have
printed it out and will keep it handy for the next time I need to ask a
question. Again, I must say that even though I did ask the question
improperly I think that it could have been deduced that I didn't have a
better way to ask the question and maybe someone could have been courteous
enough to let me know my question was poorly phrase.

Thanks!
Joe Rojas


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)

My conclusion is that you should work on your skills related to asking a
technical question. No, one doesn't need to know the answer to a question to
be able to formulate a question about it. Sometimes that even hinders the
process. I'm still learning about Exchange daily, and still ask the odd
technical question in this forum and others. Some of them could probably be
phrased better, and on occasion I've even been spanked for one reason or
another.[1]

Since you asked, let's look at your question and see how it could have been
improved:

> I am trying to find some kind of documentation on the
> different levels of logging in the 'diagnostics logging' tab
> of the IMC (Exchange 5.5). I am trying to find out what is
> logged at the different levels for all the categories.
> (Initialization/Termination, Addressing, Message Transfer,
> SMTP Interface Events, Internal Processing, SMTP Protocol
> Log, and Message
> Archival)

My revised version:

I've been looking on the web and the Exchange help files for
documentation[2] of the different levels of logging related to the
diagnostics tab of the IMC (Exchange 5.5)[3]. Does anyone know if there is a
document on the web[4] which details what is logged at the different levels?
(Init  Archival) If so, could you please provide a link?[6]

/Some/ of what you are looking for is documented, but a complete and
comprehensive document is not available. In response to the above question
you might have gotten links to some of the information along with a
suggestion to test for the rest. If /I/ were asking the question, I might
have included information on why I was looking for the information. General
curiosity isn't one of the reasons I generally do Exchange research though
unfortunately. However, including that information would help prevent
someone from pondering why you wanted it and perhaps presenting other
peripheral (and incorrect) solutions based on assumptions the reader made.

[1] I am still grateful to a firewall admin of mine who made me read RFC821
before he's answer anymore of my SMTP related questions. The bastard.
[2] Shows what you have already done in this regard. Saves you (hopefully)
from receiving an answer of STFW or RTFM in the event you simply missed it.
[3] You included the Exchange version and specific tab which was nice.
[4] A query for pre-existing documentation.[5]
[5] Since I've seen people ask questions where the underlying assumption was
someone will whip up a 12 page treatise on a subject, it's a nice touch.
[6] Saves you from someone simply answering "yes" to the question "Does
anyone know.."

> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:25 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
>
>
> So what is your conclusion Chris? Should I first learn
> everything I need to know before I ask a question so that my
> question can be accurately written? Wouldn't that mean that I
> wouldn't have to ask the question? I am confused. That
> question was properly phrase relative to my knowledge of
> Exchange. I can see how to you it would be poorly phrase but
> you don't seem to remember that we all start out as "newbies"
> to exchange, even you. How did you learn? Did you do
> everything on your own? If you did, I admire that. I am more
> likely to bet that you asked question along the way. Just
> because your knowledge of Exchange is where I want to get my
> knowledge level doesn't mean that you have to look down on
> the little people...or does it? I wouldn't know because I
> haven't got there yet...

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: BCC problems in Public Folders

2002-09-09 Thread Christopher Hummert

Ok I did a little more looking around. He can see some messages with the
BCC field in there and some of them he can't.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: BCC problems in Public Folders


He's also trying to tell me that the BCC field always appeared before.
Would this be normal behavior for a public folder?

-Chris

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 8:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: BCC problems in Public Folders


Ahh, maybe look at the original sent message in his Sent Items folder?

Geoff...


-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: BCC problems in Public Folders


My boss ended up putting some messages into a public folder that he has
some BCC address in. Now he can't see who he sent them to. Is there
anyway to see the info in the BCC field?

-Chris


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   >