RE: Exchange 5.5 IMS (port 25) fails - revisited.

[Ed Crowley]

Install the Exchange Administrator (free) on the backup machine and then
you can correctly back up Exchange from that machine using NTBACKUP.
Forget kludgy brick backups:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shawn Connelly
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 IMS (port 25) fails - revisited.


>I wondered about the SPAM in the OUT folder.  How did it get there?  
>Yet, I've tested for an Open Relay and come up clean every time. I've 
>always assumed that SPAM in the outbox was just one of those weird 
>things with Exchange Server and that the SPAM never actually gets sent 
>out of my company.

Actually, on close inspection (I LOOKED at the subject line); all of
these "SPAM messages" in the imcdata\OUT folder are actually
undeliverable
receipts!   NOT an indication of an OPEN RELAY as some of you strongly
suggested!   

Repeat, I DO NOT HAVE AN OPEN RELAY!

Now that we are past that
Can someone please (politely) suggest reasons why port 25 fails after
backing up the message stores.  To fix this, I must stop and restart the
services again, however, sometimes even that doesn't work until I delete
the contents of the imcdata\OUT folder (always filled with undeliverable
messages as a result of SPAM).  Please note, this problem only began
about a month ago and the following batch file has worked successfully
for over 1 year.

rem *** Stop appropriate services in order...
net stop MSExchangeIMC
net stop MSExchangeMSMI
net stop MSExchangeMTA
net stop MSExchangeIS
net stop MSExchangeDS
net stop MSExchangeSA
rem
rem *** Backup commands

copy c:\exchsrvr\dsadata\dir.edb f:\secure\backup\dir_b.edb 
copy d:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv.edb f:\secure\backup\priv_b.edb copy
d:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb f:\secure\backup\pub_b.edb rem pause rem rem
*** Start appropriate services in order... rem net start MSExchangeSA
net start MSExchangeDS net start MSExchangeIS net start MSExchangeMTA
net start MSExchangeMSMI net start MSExchangeIMC exit 

Yes, I know... not an ideal way of backup up 5Gb's worth of message
stores but it does the job when your company didn't have the funds for
another tape backup unit and software.

Now I have a more appropriate budget and I just purchased a new Sony AIT
backup drive.  Now I require software that will backup Exchange 5.5
(brick level preferred) from another computer (i.e. I do not wish to
install tape drive on Exchange Server). 

Which product(s) are recommended?

Thank you for your kind help,
SDC



--- 
Shawn Connelly, Network Engineer.  Dipix Technologies Inc.   
613-596-4942 x177  or dial extension 0 to page me. 
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange & AS/400

[Ed Crowley]

So where's lakeco.com?

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brett Wesoloski
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange & AS/400


SMTP [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 10:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange & AS/400


What do your recipient policies say?

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brett Wesoloski
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange & AS/400


Exchange 5.5

A couple quick questions.

I am having a problem with my reply to address.  It seems to be putting
.exchange after everyone's e-mail address.

For example:
my e-mail address should be [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I am getting
for a reply to address [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The send to address are very strange when you get them as well.  For
example If I were sending an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the to
address would have [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The other question I have is if it is possible to setup exchange to act
as a remote e-mail server. For example, I want to e-mail from the
AS/400, it has its own SMTP service, but you don't know if the mail has
been rejected or not. I want to see if I can use exchange someway to
help out. There is not AS/400 version of Outlook and I can't find any
information on this.

Any thoughts on either of these?

TIA,
Brett

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help

[Ed Crowley]

Actually, in the GUI you can select the radiobutton or checkbox to
overwrite multivalued values, or you can specify same in a options file.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11
Ben T
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help


OK, thanks for elaborating.


Ben Parrnelli
Network Administrator
Comm & Data Directorate
MAGTF Training Command
29 Palms, CA 92278


-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help


Default behavior is to append multivalued fields, not overwrite. So ~DEL
is necessary to clear it out first.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 2:27 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help
> 
> 
> Why would he not be able to import the csv with the required
> addresses only
> or the field empty without using ~DEL?
> 
> I've done this several times when removing other addresses
> and other fields
> and have had a problem.  Yet.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> Ben Parrnelli
> Network Administrator
> Comm & Data Directorate
> MAGTF Training Command
> 29 Palms, CA 92278
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:23 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help
> 
> 
> There is no way to delete just the SMTP addresses.  What you
> have to do
> is export all the addresses first and massage the data to delete the
> SMTP addresses, then import it back.  You'll need two lines for each
> object in the import file.  The first will have "~DEL" (without the
> quotes) in the E-Mail Addresses and Secondary-Proxy-Addresses
> attributes, then the second line adds back all the addresses 
> except the
> SMTP addresses.
> 
> However, I'm not sure all of this is really what you want.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
> Technical Consultant
> hp Services
> "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral
> problems."
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Lloyd, D (Dave)
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 8:50 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> With Exchange 5.5 SP4, what is the method of removing all
> SMTP addresses
> in bulk - ie using Directory Import? I've been given a csv by our HO
> with the entry ~DEL but all it gives me is errors on import.  A
> google search seems to bring me stuff in foreign languages.
> 
> The reason behing this request is that we are in the middle
> of migrating
> to E2K.  The dist lists have been created and populated in 2K already.
> Now we are ready to hide the E55 ones and replicate the 2K 
> ones back as
> custom recipients.  I think we need to remove the SMTP 
> address in order
> to have it in the custom recipient pointing to 2K. Since HO don't wake
> up for another few hours I hoped to get insight here.
> 
> (And yes, this is in a lab first.)
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Dave
> 
> ==
> De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en
> is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht 
> onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en 
> de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. 
> ==
> The information contained in this message may be confidential 
> and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you 
> receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents 
> herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.
> 
> 
> ==
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   

RE: The SEC is killing me.

[Ed Crowley]

What are you doing about instant messaging?  Don't you have to keep all
IM transactions as well?

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 6:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me.


This will not help you with your SEC problem.  It's just a musing and is
merely to suggest that no audit technique is fool proof.  I think that
any system that you can design, a clever person can get around.

Let me suggest a scenario from back in the days when I was working on
virus delivery techniques and counter measures.  The key to this
particular "almost impossible to detect" nefarious message delivery
technique would be to send a message to an external mailbox that had a
client running against it with in-box rules enabled.  The client could
parse the message and execute a script or even an external program that
would generate another message, which could be sent to any smtp address
(or in the case of a virus, do nefarious things on  its own local
network).  So let's say I send a one word message to my home mailbox
that says "hi."  That could trigger a script that sends a message to
tell someone to sell.  Another script triggered by "dinner tonight"
could trigger a script that generates the buy message. You get the idea.
The offending message itself can be as simple or complex but apparently
harmless cipher that you could imagine.  It could even be embedded in a
pattern that looks like I'm sending a daily (or better yet, apparently
random and occasional) note commenting on tonight's menu, with an "if
message text contains" filter at the other end.  A hindered word note
that contained the phrase "rare steak" could be the trigger.  The "to"
address is not that of the ultimate recipient, and the instruction in a
form that you could detect is beyond the reach of your archives and
searches. There reality is, that you simply cannot filter for this sort
of thing in your archives.  You can find someone that is being stupid or
careless, but not someone that is cunning and deliberate.

The extent to which variations on this technique can be used is
frightening. Consider what a batch file on a DOS machine could do, in
terms of generating an Assembly language program by having VB Script
simply write stings from an Excel or Word document to a text file.  The
VB Script does not even have to travel with the Office document, but can
simply be running on the machine on the receiving end.  Such a trigger
can be hidden behind layer upon layer of isolating techniques.  The
initial trigger instruction does not have to be sent via SMTP.  A FAX to
something like a SatisFAXtion modem or a call to an IVR system listening
for a specific DMTF sequence that would not be recorded by your phone
system can do it.  A web site can do it.  Web mail to your home smtp
address can do it.  A cellular call . . .  You get the idea. Every link
will leave some tracks, but those tracks can be incomplete and look very
harmless.

Back in the 80's before Microsoft Office became the dominant office
suite, there was a product called "Smartware" by a small company in
Lenexa, Kansas that was later purchased by Informix and destroyed.
Smartware had the equivalent of VBA in all of its modules, and it had a
communications module. The second version of the package even had PEEK
and POKE instructions. Imagine what you could do with that today in and
administrative security context on a Win2K machine in an Internet world.


Nedry (a transposition of "nerdy") is still out there.


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: The SEC is killing me.


There are a number of archival solutions out there. Some of them are
listed at www.mail-resources.com in addition to the ones Gary mentioned.
Contact me offline, I might have some other ideas.

On 1/15/03 17:05, "Clemens, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Mixed Exchange 5.5 SP4 / Exchange 2000 SP3 
100% Active Directory 
100% Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4 

Our Legal and Security department wants us to provide the ability to
access 
every e-mail the company sends or receives for a period of 90 days to 
satisfy certain SEC requirements.  

The original plan was to Journal everything into a mailbox using an
Exchange

5.5 server.  It worked in so far as all the mail went to the 
mailbox...but...After it got over 100 messages outlook didn't do a
very 
good job searching it. 

So we moved the Journal to Exchange 2000 and are Indexing it.  With
50 
messages so far Outlook searches it pretty fast.  So far so good. 

I guess my questions iswhat is everyone else out there doing to
satisfy 
SEC requirements for Electronic Documents Retention?  Is there a better
way?

O

RE: one more SMTP puzzle

[Ed Crowley]

That is not entirely unfathomable with Exchange 2000, my friend.  It
does seem to have a mind of its own sometimes.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: one more SMTP puzzle


All on it's own the bits and bytes spinning in a virtual world of
magnetic potentialities up and changed themselves.

Yeah-huh, right.

- Original Message -
From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: one more SMTP puzzle


He says server was working fine and this started occurring all of a
sudden.

-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: one more SMTP puzzle


> I narrowed it down to his virtual SMTP server. It does not like when 
> someone says EHLO to it and immediately drops connection.
>
> 220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service,
> Version: 5.0.2195.53
> 29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:28:08 -0500
> EHLO andrey_pc
> 500 Failed to exchange X-LSA info, closing transmission channel
>
> Connection to host lost.
>
>
> When I say HELO, everything works fine --
>
> 220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service,
> Version: 5.0.2195.53
> 29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:29:31 -0500
> helo andrey_pc
> 250 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Hello [207.21.208.111]

Sounds like something in your set-up complies with RFC821 but not
RFC2821. Can't think of any tests off-hand that would confirm this
though.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: The SEC is killing me.

[Dupler, Craig]

This will not help you with your SEC problem.  It's just a musing and is
merely to suggest that no audit technique is fool proof.  I think that any
system that you can design, a clever person can get around.

Let me suggest a scenario from back in the days when I was working on virus
delivery techniques and counter measures.  The key to this particular
"almost impossible to detect" nefarious message delivery technique would be
to send a message to an external mailbox that had a client running against
it with in-box rules enabled.  The client could parse the message and
execute a script or even an external program that would generate another
message, which could be sent to any smtp address (or in the case of a virus,
do nefarious things on  its own local network).  So let's say I send a one
word message to my home mailbox that says "hi."  That could trigger a script
that sends a message to tell someone to sell.  Another script triggered by
"dinner tonight" could trigger a script that generates the buy message.
You get the idea.  The offending message itself can be as simple or complex
but apparently harmless cipher that you could imagine.  It could even be
embedded in a pattern that looks like I'm sending a daily (or better yet,
apparently random and occasional) note commenting on tonight's menu, with an
"if message text contains" filter at the other end.  A hindered word note
that contained the phrase "rare steak" could be the trigger.  The "to"
address is not that of the ultimate recipient, and the instruction in a form
that you could detect is beyond the reach of your archives and searches.
There reality is, that you simply cannot filter for this sort of thing in
your archives.  You can find someone that is being stupid or careless, but
not someone that is cunning and deliberate.

The extent to which variations on this technique can be used is frightening.
Consider what a batch file on a DOS machine could do, in terms of generating
an Assembly language program by having VB Script simply write stings from an
Excel or Word document to a text file.  The VB Script does not even have to
travel with the Office document, but can simply be running on the machine on
the receiving end.  Such a trigger can be hidden behind layer upon layer of
isolating techniques.  The initial trigger instruction does not have to be
sent via SMTP.  A FAX to something like a SatisFAXtion modem or a call to an
IVR system listening for a specific DMTF sequence that would not be recorded
by your phone system can do it.  A web site can do it.  Web mail to your
home smtp address can do it.  A cellular call . . .  You get the idea.
Every link will leave some tracks, but those tracks can be incomplete and
look very harmless.

Back in the 80's before Microsoft Office became the dominant office suite,
there was a product called "Smartware" by a small company in Lenexa, Kansas
that was later purchased by Informix and destroyed.  Smartware had the
equivalent of VBA in all of its modules, and it had a communications module.
The second version of the package even had PEEK and POKE instructions.
Imagine what you could do with that today in and administrative security
context on a Win2K machine in an Internet world.  

Nedry (a transposition of "nerdy") is still out there.


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: The SEC is killing me.


There are a number of archival solutions out there. Some of them are listed
at www.mail-resources.com in addition to the ones Gary mentioned. Contact me
offline, I might have some other ideas.

On 1/15/03 17:05, "Clemens, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Mixed Exchange 5.5 SP4 / Exchange 2000 SP3 
100% Active Directory 
100% Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4 

Our Legal and Security department wants us to provide the ability to access 
every e-mail the company sends or receives for a period of 90 days to 
satisfy certain SEC requirements.  

The original plan was to Journal everything into a mailbox using an Exchange

5.5 server.  It worked in so far as all the mail went to the 
mailbox...but...After it got over 100 messages outlook didn't do a very 
good job searching it. 

So we moved the Journal to Exchange 2000 and are Indexing it.  With 50 
messages so far Outlook searches it pretty fast.  So far so good. 

I guess my questions iswhat is everyone else out there doing to satisfy 
SEC requirements for Electronic Documents Retention?  Is there a better way?

Or Better Software?  

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com

RE: WORM_SOBIG.A

[Shawn Connelly]

I've seen this one.  My Sophos Mailmonitor IS catching it!

Sorry but it really doesn't surprise me that NAI is missing this worm.  I
suffered through a year with McAfee, and then switched to a combination of
Sophos (primary) and Symantec (for mobile users and backup servers).  I
haven't had any virus/worm (or crashes due to poorly written virus software)
in the past four years!!

Check out Sophos - Excellent/friendly 24h/365 worldwide support and fairly
inexpensive.

SDC
--- 
Shawn Connelly, Network Engineer.  Dipix Technologies Inc.   
613-596-4942 x177  or dial extension 0 to page me. 
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 14 January 2003 00:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: WORM_SOBIG.A


I'm not sure about you guys, but we are getting hammered with this. NAI
doesn't even see it. That is what we use at our Gateway. Latest engine and
all. They say they can catch it, but it flies through the gateway like it
doesn't even care. HOWEVER, the lovely and talented Trend Scanmail sees it
and kills it dead.
 
Just a warning



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: The SEC is killing me.

[Chris Scharff]

There are a number of archival solutions out there. Some of them are listed
at www.mail-resources.com in addition to the ones Gary mentioned. Contact me
offline, I might have some other ideas.

On 1/15/03 17:05, "Clemens, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Mixed Exchange 5.5 SP4 / Exchange 2000 SP3 
100% Active Directory 
100% Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4 

Our Legal and Security department wants us to provide the ability to access 
every e-mail the company sends or receives for a period of 90 days to 
satisfy certain SEC requirements.  

The original plan was to Journal everything into a mailbox using an Exchange

5.5 server.  It worked in so far as all the mail went to the 
mailbox...but...After it got over 100 messages outlook didn't do a very 
good job searching it. 

So we moved the Journal to Exchange 2000 and are Indexing it.  With 50 
messages so far Outlook searches it pretty fast.  So far so good. 

I guess my questions iswhat is everyone else out there doing to satisfy 
SEC requirements for Electronic Documents Retention?  Is there a better way?

Or Better Software?  

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: The SEC is killing me.

[Chris Scharff]

That's generally insufficent to meet SEC requirements or is extremely
expensive during compliance incidents.

On 1/15/03 17:30, "Daniel Chenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Just have a 90-day backup tape retention policy. 

- Original Message - 
From: "Clemens, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:05 PM 
Subject: The SEC is killing me. 


> Mixed Exchange 5.5 SP4 / Exchange 2000 SP3 
> 100% Active Directory 
> 100% Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4 
> 
> Our Legal and Security department wants us to provide the ability to 
access 
> every e-mail the company sends or receives for a period of 90 days to 
> satisfy certain SEC requirements. 
> 
> The original plan was to Journal everything into a mailbox using an 
Exchange 
> 5.5 server.  It worked in so far as all the mail went to the 
> mailbox...but...After it got over 100 messages outlook didn't do a 
very 
> good job searching it. 
> 
> So we moved the Journal to Exchange 2000 and are Indexing it.  With 50

> messages so far Outlook searches it pretty fast.  So far so good. 
> 
> I guess my questions iswhat is everyone else out there doing to 
satisfy 
> SEC requirements for Electronic Documents Retention?  Is there a better 
way? 
> Or Better Software? 
> 
> _ 
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 



_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: The SEC is killing me.

[Slinger, Gary]

Google is your friend...  Search phrases like '"SEC Compiant" email' aren't
that hard to conjure.

OK, I'll play nice:

http://www.tumbleweed.com/en/industries/financial_services/

http://www.optical.com/

You could probably configure http://www.ixos.com or http://www.kvault.com to
meet the needs as well.

Gary

-Original Message-
From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 19:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me.


That was also discussed as a solution but here is why we said no to that
one:

In one scenario the SEC requested all e-mails from 7 individuals relating to
insider trading from a specific period of 7 days.  Now if we utilized the
Back-up scenario we would have had to do 3 different restores (because the
users were spread across 3 different sites and then exmerge the data into 7
different PST'sbut what if we have some smart users here and not only
did they delete the message but the removed it from the deleted items
retention?  A backup won't catch that.Not so far fetched.  The Journal
is mutch easier to manage from our perspective its just difficult to search.

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: The SEC is killing me.


Just have a 90-day backup tape retention policy.

- Original Message -
From: "Clemens, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:05 PM
Subject: The SEC is killing me.


> Mixed Exchange 5.5 SP4 / Exchange 2000 SP3
> 100% Active Directory
> 100% Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4
>
> Our Legal and Security department wants us to provide the ability to
access
> every e-mail the company sends or receives for a period of 90 days to
> satisfy certain SEC requirements.
>
> The original plan was to Journal everything into a mailbox using an
Exchange
> 5.5 server.  It worked in so far as all the mail went to the
> mailbox...but...After it got over 100 messages outlook didn't do a
very
> good job searching it.
>
> So we moved the Journal to Exchange 2000 and are Indexing it.  With
> 50 messages so far Outlook searches it pretty fast.  So far so 
> good.
>
> I guess my questions iswhat is everyone else out there doing to
satisfy
> SEC requirements for Electronic Documents Retention?  Is there a
> better
way?
> Or Better Software?
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: The SEC is killing me.

[Clemens, Rick]

That was also discussed as a solution but here is why we said no to that
one:

In one scenario the SEC requested all e-mails from 7 individuals relating to
insider trading from a specific period of 7 days.  Now if we utilized the
Back-up scenario we would have had to do 3 different restores (because the
users were spread across 3 different sites and then exmerge the data into 7
different PST'sbut what if we have some smart users here and not only
did they delete the message but the removed it from the deleted items
retention?  A backup won't catch that.Not so far fetched.  The Journal
is mutch easier to manage from our perspective its just difficult to search.

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: The SEC is killing me.


Just have a 90-day backup tape retention policy.

- Original Message -
From: "Clemens, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:05 PM
Subject: The SEC is killing me.


> Mixed Exchange 5.5 SP4 / Exchange 2000 SP3
> 100% Active Directory
> 100% Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4
>
> Our Legal and Security department wants us to provide the ability to
access
> every e-mail the company sends or receives for a period of 90 days to 
> satisfy certain SEC requirements.
>
> The original plan was to Journal everything into a mailbox using an
Exchange
> 5.5 server.  It worked in so far as all the mail went to the 
> mailbox...but...After it got over 100 messages outlook didn't do a
very
> good job searching it.
>
> So we moved the Journal to Exchange 2000 and are Indexing it.  With 
> 50 messages so far Outlook searches it pretty fast.  So far so 
> good.
>
> I guess my questions iswhat is everyone else out there doing to
satisfy
> SEC requirements for Electronic Documents Retention?  Is there a 
> better
way?
> Or Better Software?
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Anyone tried a tablet?

[Glenn Corbett]

Yep, used the Compaq/HP one quite a bit, thoughts so far:

- Nice product, although the "notebook" part (the keyboard) feels a little
flimsy, seems to work ok though
- The Transmeta processor is a nice idea, but from experience the machine
seems very sluggish at first, but once things are up and running, the speed
improves (once the processor has been able to do its optimisation thing
presumably, and XP can cache)
- The standard memory definitely isn't enough, the machine was hitting the
drive way to much (this is probably more attributable to XP), added the
additional 256MB of ram, now runs much faster and smoother.
- Docking station is a must, you actually cant complete an initial
installation (install office XP etc) without either a network connection
(wired or wireless) or a USB CD-ROM drive (which actually worked quite
well), if you don't have a docking station
- Screen is nice, and viewable angles are quite good
- Handwriting recognition works well, but does work the CPU quite hard
- The tablet pen "left click" can be awkward for a left handed person like
me (but maybe that's just me), this also includes the default screen layout,
where all the icons and menus are on the left hand side of the screen.
- Fingerprints etc on the screen are a pain, but this will probably be
standard fare for these sorts of devices
- The Transmeta power management works well, device has been running all day
on one charge (depending on what you are doing obviously)
- Device does get quite warm, but with the keyboard folded underneath a lot
of the heat isn't as noticeable when you are holding it

Glenn

- Original Message -
From: "Ali Wilkes (IT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:45 AM
Subject: OT: Anyone tried a tablet?


We have a Toshiba tablet PC for eval.  Nice toy, can see some benefits.
I personally would wait a while before buying one.

I would like to get a look at the HP/Compaq.  The reviews on this tend
to be opposing (It's fast!  It's slow!  It's great!  It sucks!).

SO,

Anyone used a tablet pc?  Got one?  Hated it?  Comments?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: one more SMTP puzzle

[Daniel Chenault]

All on it's own the bits and bytes spinning in a virtual world of magnetic
potentialities up and changed themselves.

Yeah-huh, right.

- Original Message -
From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: one more SMTP puzzle


He says server was working fine and this started occurring all of a sudden.

-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: one more SMTP puzzle


> I narrowed it down to his virtual SMTP server. It does not
> like when someone says EHLO to it and immediately drops connection.
>
> 220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service,
> Version: 5.0.2195.53
> 29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:28:08 -0500
> EHLO andrey_pc
> 500 Failed to exchange X-LSA info, closing transmission channel
>
> Connection to host lost.
>
>
> When I say HELO, everything works fine --
>
> 220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service,
> Version: 5.0.2195.53
> 29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:29:31 -0500
> helo andrey_pc
> 250 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Hello [207.21.208.111]

Sounds like something in your set-up complies with RFC821 but not RFC2821.
Can't think of any tests off-hand that would confirm this though.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: The SEC is killing me.

[Daniel Chenault]

Just have a 90-day backup tape retention policy.

- Original Message -
From: "Clemens, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:05 PM
Subject: The SEC is killing me.


> Mixed Exchange 5.5 SP4 / Exchange 2000 SP3
> 100% Active Directory
> 100% Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4
>
> Our Legal and Security department wants us to provide the ability to
access
> every e-mail the company sends or receives for a period of 90 days to
> satisfy certain SEC requirements.
>
> The original plan was to Journal everything into a mailbox using an
Exchange
> 5.5 server.  It worked in so far as all the mail went to the
> mailbox...but...After it got over 100 messages outlook didn't do a
very
> good job searching it.
>
> So we moved the Journal to Exchange 2000 and are Indexing it.  With 50
> messages so far Outlook searches it pretty fast.  So far so good.
>
> I guess my questions iswhat is everyone else out there doing to
satisfy
> SEC requirements for Electronic Documents Retention?  Is there a better
way?
> Or Better Software?
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The SEC is killing me.

[Clemens, Rick]

Mixed Exchange 5.5 SP4 / Exchange 2000 SP3
100% Active Directory
100% Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4

Our Legal and Security department wants us to provide the ability to access
every e-mail the company sends or receives for a period of 90 days to
satisfy certain SEC requirements.  

The original plan was to Journal everything into a mailbox using an Exchange
5.5 server.  It worked in so far as all the mail went to the
mailbox...but...After it got over 100 messages outlook didn't do a very
good job searching it.

So we moved the Journal to Exchange 2000 and are Indexing it.  With 50
messages so far Outlook searches it pretty fast.  So far so good.

I guess my questions iswhat is everyone else out there doing to satisfy
SEC requirements for Electronic Documents Retention?  Is there a better way?
Or Better Software?  

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

IMSS SMTP Server Question

[Clemens, Rick]

IMSS which is the next version of Trend Micro's Virus Wall provides the
ability to do reverse DNS lookups.  It is my understanding that this will
help reduce SPAM from bogus addresses but will require more CPU resources to
accomplish.  

My question is is anyone else using Reverse DNS Lookup's?  And what happens
when a companies SMTP server is NAT'd behind a firewall and port 25 is just
passed on to the internal SMTP server?  

The problem being that their External MX record will point to the Firewall
but the SMTP packet will reflect the actual SMTP server name
internally..When My SMTP server tries to reverse DNS lookup on itit
will not be able to resolve and My company will not be able to send e-mail
back and forth with this company.

Am I stating what happens correctly?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: trouble sending to specific domain

[B. van Ouwerkerk]

Something like this:

http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2002-07/0196.html

Other SMTP servers: www.google.com


--B.

At 14:03 15-01-2003 -0800, you wrote:

From time to time my users receive the error listed below when attempting
to send mail to that specific domain.  Occasionally the messages get
through without issue and other times not at all. We do not have problems
sending mail to other domains. Any ideas? Help would be greatly
appreciated.


amgen.com  on 12/22/2002 5:04 PM

There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's
email server.  Please contact your system administrator.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exch 5.5 F/B System folder

[William Lefkovics]

 
XADM: Reassigning Site Roles after Removing the First Server
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;152960

William 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Lindtner
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

I seem to have lost the only replica of our Free/Busy system folder when
we
took a temporary server off-line many months ago.

Does anyone know of a way to re-create or replace it?



I get the following error when trying to start the F/B connector:

The contents of this public folder are currently unavailable. Either the
Microsoft Exchange Server computer servicing this public folder is down
or
the public folder has not been replicated to this site. See your
administrator.

Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
ID no: 80004005-0507- 


Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exch 5.5 F/B System folder

[Gary Lindtner]

I seem to have lost the only replica of our Free/Busy system folder when we
took a temporary server off-line many months ago.

Does anyone know of a way to re-create or replace it?



I get the following error when trying to start the F/B connector:

The contents of this public folder are currently unavailable. Either the
Microsoft Exchange Server computer servicing this public folder is down or
the public folder has not been replicated to this site. See your
administrator.

Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store
ID no: 80004005-0507- 


Thanks!

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Backup onto LTO and compression question.

[John Matteson]

It depends on other factors as well, the number and sizes of your
tracking logs, the number of transaction logs on the server, are you
indexing your message stores

I'm currently backing up 164 Gbytes of data, that's a public folder
store, three message stores in one storage group, tracking logs,
transaction logs, indexes, etc. on one LTO-1 tape.

Be advised, you may need to update the drivers on the PERC card and the
SCSI card connecting the LTO tape unit in order to get decent
performance out of it. The default Win2K drivers for the SCSI cards have
a bug in them.

John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.



-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:41 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Backup onto LTO and compression question.
Subject: Backup onto LTO and compression question.


This might be somewhat of a vague question.  We current have a
DellPowervault LTO 110T backup tape drive on our primary Exchange
Server. It will back up 100 Gig non-compressed or 200 Gig compressed.
Does anyone know the maximum size an Exchange DB can be if you use
compression on the tape?  I'm not sure how well the Exchange DB will
compress.

Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH  45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax - (513) 556-2042


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Directory Replication

[John Matteson]

1. pull the DR connector from D -> F

Once Site F disappears from Site C,

2. connect a DR between C and F.

3. Pull the DR from C to D.

Once site D disappears from Site C,

4. delete the site connector.

If site C has more than one server in it, make sure that any change you
make on one machine in the site, shows up on the other machines in the
site before proceeding to the next step.

John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.



-Original Message-
From: Elmerick, Ralph H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:15 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Directory Replication
Subject: RE: Directory Replication


We are tearing down a site D in our MS 5.5 Exchange Organization Site C
has a site connector to both Site D and Site F however Site C has a
Directory Replication Connector to only Site D.  Site D and Site F have
a directory replication connector.  What is the best way to tear down
Site D, remove the Site Connectors from Site C and F and to put a
Directory Replication Connector between Site C and Site F and make sure
replication between all Sites in the Organization take place.  There are
10 other sites as well all go through Site C.  Site C is the main
bridgehead for the Organization.

Thank you 

Ralph H. Elmerick
NT/Exchange Administrator
330-471-3409


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


**
This message and any attachments are intended for the 
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient,
please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this 
communication to others; also please notify the sender by 
replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. 

The Timken Company
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

trouble sending to specific domain

[wade robinson]

>From time to time my users receive the error listed below when attempting
to send mail to that specific domain.  Occasionally the messages get
through without issue and other times not at all. We do not have problems
sending mail to other domains. Any ideas? Help would be greatly
appreciated.


amgen.com  on 12/22/2002 5:04 PM

There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's
email server.  Please contact your system administrator.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Restore to Another Server

[Mike Winfrey]

I have 2 Exchange 2000 servers that are patched to the same level. I'm
trying to restore a backup of a Mailbox store from one server to the
other.  I'm using Ntbackup and I keep getting "The specified computer is
not a Microsoft Exchange Server or its Exchange Server services are not
started."  I checked and the services are, in fact, started on the
server I'm trying to restore to. So, I'm not sure what's going on.  Any
ideas???

Thanks,
Mike Winfrey

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: E-Mail disclaimers for Exch2k

[William Lefkovics]

 
www.exclaimer.co.uk
www.disclaimit.com

William 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steve Iadarola
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

Came across the post last week about the MS VBS Article.  I need to find
a
product to do this.  Does anyone have any suggestions on the best/most
user
friendly 3rd party software package to add an email disclaimer to all
email?
Any thoughts/experience would be appreciated.

TIA,
Steve Iadarola


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: E-Mail disclaimers for Exch2k

[William Lefkovics]

 
www.exclaimer.co.uk
www.disclaimit.com

William 
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steve Iadarola
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions

Came across the post last week about the MS VBS Article.  I need to find
a
product to do this.  Does anyone have any suggestions on the best/most
user
friendly 3rd party software package to add an email disclaimer to all
email?
Any thoughts/experience would be appreciated.

TIA,
Steve Iadarola


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Backup onto LTO and compression question.

[Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)]

Yes.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Backup onto LTO and compression question.


Does it matter?

- Original Message -
From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:41 PM
Subject: Backup onto LTO and compression question.


> This might be somewhat of a vague question.  We current have a
> DellPowervault LTO 110T backup tape drive on our primary Exchange Server.
> It will back up 100 Gig non-compressed or 200 Gig compressed.  Does anyone
> know the maximum size an Exchange DB can be if you use compression on the
> tape?  I'm not sure how well the Exchange DB will compress.
>
> Pete Pfefferkorn
> Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
> University of Cincinnati
> 51 Goodman Street
> Cincinnati, OH  45221
> Phone - (513) 556-9076
> Fax - (513) 556-2042
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Backup onto LTO and compression question.

[Andy David]

Does it matter?

- Original Message -
From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:41 PM
Subject: Backup onto LTO and compression question.


> This might be somewhat of a vague question.  We current have a
> DellPowervault LTO 110T backup tape drive on our primary Exchange Server.
> It will back up 100 Gig non-compressed or 200 Gig compressed.  Does anyone
> know the maximum size an Exchange DB can be if you use compression on the
> tape?  I'm not sure how well the Exchange DB will compress.
>
> Pete Pfefferkorn
> Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
> University of Cincinnati
> 51 Goodman Street
> Cincinnati, OH  45221
> Phone - (513) 556-9076
> Fax - (513) 556-2042
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus activity

[East, Bill]

It's like there's a party in my Exchange server and everyone's invited.

-- 
be - MOS



To restore a sense of reality, I think Walt Disney should have a
Hardluckland.
-- Jack Paar


> -Original Message-
> From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 2:08 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Virus activity
> 
> 
> Yeah, we got banged this weekend. Mostly Klez but some other 
> stuff as well,
> might have been java stuff. I got about 150 alerts from my AV 
> box. Mostly
> Saturday night and Sunday. WAY more than usual.
> 
> John Orban
> System Administrator
> The Country School
> www.countryschool.org
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:58 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Virus activity
> 
> 
> Is anyone else out there noticing a higher level of virus 
> activity in the
> last week or so?  Our gateway scanner has been catching an 
> increasing number
> of viruses over the last week.  I am also seeing a few that 
> we haven't seen
> in quite a while.  I am not concerned, just curious if others 
> have noticed
> this also.
> 
> -Ryan
> 
>  
>  
>  
> N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
> Network Administrator
> X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
> Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.XRite.com
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Backup onto LTO and compression question.

[Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)]

This might be somewhat of a vague question.  We current have a
DellPowervault LTO 110T backup tape drive on our primary Exchange Server.
It will back up 100 Gig non-compressed or 200 Gig compressed.  Does anyone
know the maximum size an Exchange DB can be if you use compression on the
tape?  I'm not sure how well the Exchange DB will compress.

Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH  45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax - (513) 556-2042


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC 2003

[Blunt, James H (Jim)]

No...they've always been too big!

;0)

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2003



Soyou ever smoke a Blunt?

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2003


And exactly WHAT is that supposed to mean?  ;0)

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2003


Its rolled into a blunt

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC 2003


Is it rolled in with TechEd this year?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Directory Replication

[Elmerick, Ralph H.]

We are tearing down a site D in our MS 5.5 Exchange Organization
Site C has a site connector to both Site D and Site F however Site C has a
Directory Replication Connector to only Site D.  Site D and Site F have a
directory replication connector.  What is the best way to tear down Site D,
remove the Site Connectors from Site C and F and to put a Directory
Replication Connector between Site C and Site F and make sure replication
between all Sites in the Organization take place.  There are 10 other sites
as well all go through Site C.  Site C is the main bridgehead for the
Organization.

Thank you 

Ralph H. Elmerick
NT/Exchange Administrator
330-471-3409


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


**
This message and any attachments are intended for the 
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this 
communication to others; also please notify the sender by 
replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. 

The Timken Company
**


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: E-Mail disclaimers for Exch2k

[Pillai, Raj]

Interscan message security suite from TrendMicro does a fine job.

-Original Message-
From: Steve Iadarola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E-Mail disclaimers for Exch2k


Came across the post last week about the MS VBS Article.  I need to find
a
product to do this.  Does anyone have any suggestions on the best/most
user
friendly 3rd party software package to add an email disclaimer to all
email?
Any thoughts/experience would be appreciated.

TIA,
Steve Iadarola


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

**
This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is 
confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable
privileges, and may constitute non-public information.  This message is 
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not
the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately
notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this
message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction 
of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of
any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. 
Thank you for your cooperation.
**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS

[Ali Wilkes (IT)]

ESM = Exchange System Manager in ex2k.

If you're on 5.5 do it in Admin.

-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:03 AM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS
Subject: RE: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS


Forgive me:"ESM"  What is that?

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS


Properties -> permissions if you have it, or by going to the folder in
ESM and looking at client permissions.  Default should be listed near
the top, right next to Anonymous.

Default is what permissions your users will get if they are not
explicitly allowed or denied.

-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:52 PM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS
Subject: RE: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS


How would I be able to tell if that is the case?  You mean by
going to Calendar and right Clicking and going to properties?

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS


Make sure the permissions for Default don't allow them to do so.

-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:58 PM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS
Subject: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS


I am trying to set permissions so that no one can delete a set
calendar event on a resource conference room and users are able to
delete events even when they do not have permissions to the mailbox
calendar.  (or so it
seems.)
Has anyone else experienced this?  I would appreciate any feedback
on the resolution to this.

   Thank You,
   Alex Reed

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Reroute Incoming Mail

[Bowles, John L.]

So I'm figuring that I'm going to need to make this change in the
recipient policies?  I'm just confused on how it's suppose to be setup
in the recipient policy.  Please advise.

Thank you,

__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Messaging Team
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail


I can think of a number of legitimate reasons to have a Sendmail gateway
which have nothing to do with virus or content scanning, though those
might be legitimate reasons as well. This is especially true in
enterprise environments, or in secure environments. Exchange has rather
limited routing and rewrite capabilities in comparison.

On 1/10/03 16:00, "Christopher Hummert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Ok sorry but I'm going to ask it. Why are you doing this? Are you 
running virus or content scanning on the sendmail server? Do you know 
much about sendmail? If not, and you're not doing any scanning on the 
sendmail server it might be better to have the mail directed to the 
exchange server and take out the redundant system. 

If you do have a need for this system could you please tell us what's in

the /etc/sendmail.cf file and in the /etc/mail/ directory? 

-Original Message- 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L.

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:09 PM 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Subject: RE: Reroute Incoming Mail 


Basically we have a SendMail server that catches all email sent to one 
of our sites.  It reads a list of authenticated email addresses and then

it passes it on to our Exchange server.  So it sends it to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Then once it gets to the Exchange serverit

then process the mail from that address as "Inbound" mail.You see 
where I'm going with this?  And please.  Do not ask me why we are doing 
this.  I'm inheriting this crap.  Thanks for you help! 

__ 
John Bowles 
Exchange Administrator 
Enterprise Support & Engineering 
Celera Genomics 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 
 


-Original Message- 
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:54 PM 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Subject: Re: Reroute Incoming Mail 


There are several possible answers to that question and I'm feeling lazy

today. What are you trying to do (and I'll answer that question 
specifically if I can)? 

On 1/10/03 14:22, "Bowles, John  L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 



All, 

As in Exchange 5.5.  On the IMS connector properties you had a "Routing"


tab. Under this tab you could reroute incoming email.  Can someone point


me to where I can find the equivalent to this on E2K?  I'm driving 
myself nuts trying to find out where I can configure this.  Thanks for 
you help! 

__ 
John Bowles 
Exchange Administrator 
Enterprise Support & Engineering 
Celera Genomics 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

E-Mail disclaimers for Exch2k

[Steve Iadarola]

Came across the post last week about the MS VBS Article.  I need to find a
product to do this.  Does anyone have any suggestions on the best/most user
friendly 3rd party software package to add an email disclaimer to all email?
Any thoughts/experience would be appreciated.

TIA,
Steve Iadarola


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help

[Parrnelli GS11 Ben T]

OK, thanks for elaborating.


Ben Parrnelli
Network Administrator
Comm & Data Directorate
MAGTF Training Command
29 Palms, CA 92278


-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help


Default behavior is to append multivalued fields, not overwrite. So ~DEL is
necessary to clear it out first.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 2:27 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help
> 
> 
> Why would he not be able to import the csv with the required 
> addresses only
> or the field empty without using ~DEL?
> 
> I've done this several times when removing other addresses 
> and other fields
> and have had a problem.  Yet.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> Ben Parrnelli
> Network Administrator
> Comm & Data Directorate
> MAGTF Training Command
> 29 Palms, CA 92278
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:23 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help
> 
> 
> There is no way to delete just the SMTP addresses.  What you 
> have to do
> is export all the addresses first and massage the data to delete the
> SMTP addresses, then import it back.  You'll need two lines for each
> object in the import file.  The first will have "~DEL" (without the
> quotes) in the E-Mail Addresses and Secondary-Proxy-Addresses
> attributes, then the second line adds back all the addresses 
> except the
> SMTP addresses.
> 
> However, I'm not sure all of this is really what you want.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
> Technical Consultant
> hp Services
> "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral 
> problems."
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> Lloyd, D (Dave)
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 8:50 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> With Exchange 5.5 SP4, what is the method of removing all 
> SMTP addresses
> in bulk - ie using Directory Import? I've been given a csv by our HO
> with the entry ~DEL but all it gives me is errors on import.  A
> google search seems to bring me stuff in foreign languages.
> 
> The reason behing this request is that we are in the middle 
> of migrating
> to E2K.  The dist lists have been created and populated in 2K already.
> Now we are ready to hide the E55 ones and replicate the 2K 
> ones back as
> custom recipients.  I think we need to remove the SMTP 
> address in order
> to have it in the custom recipient pointing to 2K. Since HO don't wake
> up for another few hours I hoped to get insight here.
> 
> (And yes, this is in a lab first.)
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Dave
> 
> ==
> De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en 
> is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht 
> onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en 
> de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. 
> ==
> The information contained in this message may be confidential 
> and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you 
> receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents 
> herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.
> 
> 
> ==
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin: 

RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help

[Roger Seielstad]

Default behavior is to append multivalued fields, not overwrite. So ~DEL is
necessary to clear it out first.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -Original Message-
> From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 2:27 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help
> 
> 
> Why would he not be able to import the csv with the required 
> addresses only
> or the field empty without using ~DEL?
> 
> I've done this several times when removing other addresses 
> and other fields
> and have had a problem.  Yet.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> Ben Parrnelli
> Network Administrator
> Comm & Data Directorate
> MAGTF Training Command
> 29 Palms, CA 92278
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:23 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help
> 
> 
> There is no way to delete just the SMTP addresses.  What you 
> have to do
> is export all the addresses first and massage the data to delete the
> SMTP addresses, then import it back.  You'll need two lines for each
> object in the import file.  The first will have "~DEL" (without the
> quotes) in the E-Mail Addresses and Secondary-Proxy-Addresses
> attributes, then the second line adds back all the addresses 
> except the
> SMTP addresses.
> 
> However, I'm not sure all of this is really what you want.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
> Technical Consultant
> hp Services
> "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral 
> problems."
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
> Lloyd, D (Dave)
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 8:50 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> With Exchange 5.5 SP4, what is the method of removing all 
> SMTP addresses
> in bulk - ie using Directory Import? I've been given a csv by our HO
> with the entry ~DEL but all it gives me is errors on import.  A
> google search seems to bring me stuff in foreign languages.
> 
> The reason behing this request is that we are in the middle 
> of migrating
> to E2K.  The dist lists have been created and populated in 2K already.
> Now we are ready to hide the E55 ones and replicate the 2K 
> ones back as
> custom recipients.  I think we need to remove the SMTP 
> address in order
> to have it in the custom recipient pointing to 2K. Since HO don't wake
> up for another few hours I hoped to get insight here.
> 
> (And yes, this is in a lab first.)
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Dave
> 
> ==
> De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en 
> is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht 
> onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en 
> de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. 
> ==
> The information contained in this message may be confidential 
> and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you 
> receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents 
> herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.
> 
> 
> ==
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

SMTP timeouts for E2K same as for Exchange 5.5?

[March, Harold W.]

For the Exchange 5.5 IMC, SMTP timeout parameters were available
under the registry key 
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MsExchangeIMC\Parameters
such as SMTPWaitFor DataBlock et al.
Would anyone know for sure that the same registry entries are applicable   
 
to Exchange 2000? If not, are there equivalents?

Harold March
Systems Technology Architect
Information Technology
CMC Electronics Inc.



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC 2003

[Woodruff, Michael]

No, it makes me cough...

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 2:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2003



Soyou ever smoke a Blunt?

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2003


And exactly WHAT is that supposed to mean?  ;0)

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2003


Its rolled into a blunt

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC 2003


Is it rolled in with TechEd this year?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help

[Parrnelli GS11 Ben T]

Why would he not be able to import the csv with the required addresses only
or the field empty without using ~DEL?

I've done this several times when removing other addresses and other fields
and have had a problem.  Yet.

Thanks.


Ben Parrnelli
Network Administrator
Comm & Data Directorate
MAGTF Training Command
29 Palms, CA 92278


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help


There is no way to delete just the SMTP addresses.  What you have to do
is export all the addresses first and massage the data to delete the
SMTP addresses, then import it back.  You'll need two lines for each
object in the import file.  The first will have "~DEL" (without the
quotes) in the E-Mail Addresses and Secondary-Proxy-Addresses
attributes, then the second line adds back all the addresses except the
SMTP addresses.

However, I'm not sure all of this is really what you want.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lloyd, D (Dave)
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 8:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Ex 5.5 Directory Import help


Hi all,

With Exchange 5.5 SP4, what is the method of removing all SMTP addresses
in bulk - ie using Directory Import? I've been given a csv by our HO
with the entry ~DEL but all it gives me is errors on import.  A
google search seems to bring me stuff in foreign languages.

The reason behing this request is that we are in the middle of migrating
to E2K.  The dist lists have been created and populated in 2K already.
Now we are ready to hide the E55 ones and replicate the 2K ones back as
custom recipients.  I think we need to remove the SMTP address in order
to have it in the custom recipient pointing to 2K. Since HO don't wake
up for another few hours I hoped to get insight here.

(And yes, this is in a lab first.)

Thanks

Dave

==
De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en 
is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht 
onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en 
de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. 
==
The information contained in this message may be confidential 
and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you 
receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents 
herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.


==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC 2003

[Hutchins, Mike]

lmao

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2003



Soyou ever smoke a Blunt?

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2003


And exactly WHAT is that supposed to mean?  ;0)

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2003


Its rolled into a blunt

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC 2003


Is it rolled in with TechEd this year?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus activity

[John Orban]

Yeah, we got banged this weekend. Mostly Klez but some other stuff as well,
might have been java stuff. I got about 150 alerts from my AV box. Mostly
Saturday night and Sunday. WAY more than usual.

John Orban
System Administrator
The Country School
www.countryschool.org


-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus activity


Is anyone else out there noticing a higher level of virus activity in the
last week or so?  Our gateway scanner has been catching an increasing number
of viruses over the last week.  I am also seeing a few that we haven't seen
in quite a while.  I am not concerned, just curious if others have noticed
this also.

-Ryan

 
 
 
N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
Network Administrator
X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.XRite.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC 2003

[Martin Blackstone]

Soyou ever smoke a Blunt?

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2003


And exactly WHAT is that supposed to mean?  ;0)

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2003


Its rolled into a blunt

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC 2003


Is it rolled in with TechEd this year?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus activity

[Durkee, Peter]

Our virus income bounces around, usually in the range of 20 - 40 per day, and we've 
had sobig added to the mix recently, but overall I'd say it's pretty steady. It may 
even be down from last summer when Klez was still young. Of course there's one source, 
which I've taken to calling the Klez dispenser, that every few weeks sends us around 
100 of them over the course of an hour. 

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus activity


Nothing out of the ordinary from my end.  Just that blasted Kelz.H which
won't go away.

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

> --
> From: Ryan Fennema
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:58
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  Virus activity
> 
> Is anyone else out there noticing a higher level of virus activity in
> the last week or so?  Our gateway scanner has been catching an
> increasing number of viruses over the last week.  I am also seeing a few
> that we haven't seen in quite a while.  I am not concerned, just curious
> if others have noticed this also.
> 
> -Ryan
> 
>  
>  
>  
> N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
> Network Administrator
> X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
> Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.XRite.com
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exchange & AS/400

[Brett Wesoloski]

SMTP [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 10:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange & AS/400


What do your recipient policies say?

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brett Wesoloski
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange & AS/400


Exchange 5.5

A couple quick questions.

I am having a problem with my reply to address.  It seems to be putting
.exchange after everyone's e-mail address.

For example:
my e-mail address should be [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I am getting
for a reply to address [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The send to address are very strange when you get them as well.  For
example If I were sending an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the to
address would have [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The other question I have is if it is possible to setup exchange to act
as a remote e-mail server. For example, I want to e-mail from the
AS/400, it has its own SMTP service, but you don't know if the mail has
been rejected or not. I want to see if I can use exchange someway to
help out. There is not AS/400 version of Outlook and I can't find any
information on this.

Any thoughts on either of these?

TIA,
Brett

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Anyone tried a tablet?

[Karen McLaughlin]

Check out the Motion Computing ones (http://www.motioncomputing.com/).
They do not have a "flip-n-twist" lid like some of the other players.
I saw a demo of these - they are pretty sweet.  They can be resold by
Dell and I believe they are branded by at least one other OEM, but
I forget who.

- Karen




On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Hansen, Eric wrote:

> Is anyone trying the new gateway one?
> 
> Seems like a lot of these so called tablets are just laptops with reversible
> screens.  Imo, that's not a tablet, that's a laptop.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC 2003

[Blunt, James H (Jim)]

And exactly WHAT is that supposed to mean?  ;0)

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2003


Its rolled into a blunt

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC 2003


Is it rolled in with TechEd this year?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus activity

[Martin Blackstone]

Size queen

-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus activity


so much bigger or sobig!




-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus activity


Is anyone else out there noticing a higher level of virus activity in the
last week or so?  Our gateway scanner has been catching an increasing number
of viruses over the last week.  I am also seeing a few that we haven't seen
in quite a while.  I am not concerned, just curious if others have noticed
this also.

-Ryan

 
 
 
N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
Network Administrator
X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.XRite.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus activity

[Dflorea]

Klez, Sobig, & a series of suspicious javascript files blocked this AM.


-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus activity


Nothing out of the ordinary from my end.  Just that blasted Kelz.H which
won't go away.

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

> --
> From: Ryan Fennema
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:58
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  Virus activity
> 
> Is anyone else out there noticing a higher level of virus activity in 
> the last week or so?  Our gateway scanner has been catching an 
> increasing number of viruses over the last week.  I am also seeing a 
> few that we haven't seen in quite a while.  I am not concerned, just 
> curious if others have noticed this also.
> 
> -Ryan
> 
>  
>  
>  
> N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
> Network Administrator
> X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
> Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.XRite.com
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Anyone tried a tablet?

[Hansen, Eric]

Is anyone trying the new gateway one?

Seems like a lot of these so called tablets are just laptops with reversible
screens.  Imo, that's not a tablet, that's a laptop.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone tried a tablet?
Sensitivity: Private

Finding the battery compartment is tough, though.

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone tried a tablet?
Sensitivity: Private


I buy them at 10 for 99 cents at Office Depot.  Mine work with pens or
pencils.

Ed Crowley
HP Services

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT)
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Anyone tried a tablet?
Sensitivity: Private


We have a Toshiba tablet PC for eval.  Nice toy, can see some benefits.
I personally would wait a while before buying one.

I would like to get a look at the HP/Compaq.  The reviews on this tend
to be opposing (It's fast!  It's slow!  It's great!  It sucks!).

SO,

Anyone used a tablet pc?  Got one?  Hated it?  Comments?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus activity

[Stevens, Dave]

so much bigger or sobig!




-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus activity


Is anyone else out there noticing a higher level of virus activity in the
last week or so?  Our gateway scanner has been catching an increasing number
of viruses over the last week.  I am also seeing a few that we haven't seen
in quite a while.  I am not concerned, just curious if others have noticed
this also.

-Ryan

 
 
 
N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
Network Administrator
X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.XRite.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus activity

[Couch, Nate]

Nothing out of the ordinary from my end.  Just that blasted Kelz.H which
won't go away.

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

> --
> From: Ryan Fennema
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:58
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  Virus activity
> 
> Is anyone else out there noticing a higher level of virus activity in
> the last week or so?  Our gateway scanner has been catching an
> increasing number of viruses over the last week.  I am also seeing a few
> that we haven't seen in quite a while.  I am not concerned, just curious
> if others have noticed this also.
> 
> -Ryan
> 
>  
>  
>  
> N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
> Network Administrator
> X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
> Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.XRite.com
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: one more SMTP puzzle

[Andrey Fyodorov]

He tells me he did not change anything on the server.

I asked him if he changed anything on his network, he said no. He is a very good 
network guy too.

I am thinking that maybe his IIS metabase had a hickup.

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: one more SMTP puzzle


He changed something; what was it? Likely he was messing with security
without knowing what he was doing.

- Original Message -
From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:52 AM
Subject: one more SMTP puzzle


This time I am helping a friend of mine. His Exchange 2000 server has been
running fine until recently. Now he can'e receive mail from most places.

He could not receive mail from my Exchange server for example. Or from
Yahoo, AOL, etc.

I narrowed it down to his virtual SMTP server. It does not like when someone
says EHLO to it and immediately drops connection.

220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version:
5.0.2195.53
29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:28:08 -0500
EHLO andrey_pc
500 Failed to exchange X-LSA info, closing transmission channel

Connection to host lost.


When I say HELO, everything works fine --

220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version:
5.0.2195.53
29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:29:31 -0500
helo andrey_pc
250 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Hello [207.21.208.111]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: one more SMTP puzzle

[Andrey Fyodorov]

I guess he got it fixed. He was running on Exchange 2000 SP2. He applied SP3.

Another emergency happened though - after SP3 his Information Store service would not 
start due to service specific error 0.

He then told me that before applying SP3 he had backed up the whole server, INCLUDING 
the M: drive.  >:0

I told him to stop all remaining Exchange services, rename the Exchange BIN directory 
and run setup /disasterrecovery

He is reporting now that everything is working after that.



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: one more SMTP puzzle


BTW, seems to work fine from here:

220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version:
5.0.2195.5329 ready at  Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:21:29 -0500 
ehlo foo.bar
250-web01.domain.mistrycc.com Hello [216.30.136.98]
250-TURN
250-ATRN
250-SIZE
250-ETRN
250-PIPELINING
250-DSN
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-8bitmime
250-BINARYMIME
250-CHUNKING
250-VRFY
250-X-EXPS GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN
250-X-EXPS=LOGIN
250-AUTH GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN
250-AUTH=LOGIN
250-X-LINK2STATE
250-XEXCH50
250 OK


On 1/15/03 8:52, "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



This time I am helping a friend of mine. His Exchange 2000 server has been
running fine until recently. Now he can'e receive mail from most places.

He could not receive mail from my Exchange server for example. Or from
Yahoo, AOL, etc. 

I narrowed it down to his virtual SMTP server. It does not like when someone
says EHLO to it and immediately drops connection.

220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version:
5.0.2195.53 
29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:28:08 -0500 
EHLO andrey_pc 
500 Failed to exchange X-LSA info, closing transmission channel 

Connection to host lost. 


When I say HELO, everything works fine -- 

220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version:
5.0.2195.53 
29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:29:31 -0500 
helo andrey_pc 
250 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Hello [207.21.208.111] 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: one more SMTP puzzle

[Andrey Fyodorov]

He says server was working fine and this started occurring all of a sudden.

-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: one more SMTP puzzle


> I narrowed it down to his virtual SMTP server. It does not 
> like when someone says EHLO to it and immediately drops connection.
> 
> 220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, 
> Version: 5.0.2195.53
> 29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:28:08 -0500
> EHLO andrey_pc
> 500 Failed to exchange X-LSA info, closing transmission channel
> 
> Connection to host lost.
> 
> 
> When I say HELO, everything works fine --
> 
> 220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, 
> Version: 5.0.2195.53
> 29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:29:31 -0500
> helo andrey_pc
> 250 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Hello [207.21.208.111] 

Sounds like something in your set-up complies with RFC821 but not RFC2821. Can't think 
of any tests off-hand that would confirm this though.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus activity

[Kim Schotanus]

Yes, 

I,ve seen a lot over the last week, also a number of java-virusses on
the net...


Kim 


-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 17:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus activity


Is anyone else out there noticing a higher level of virus activity in
the last week or so?  Our gateway scanner has been catching an
increasing number of viruses over the last week.  I am also seeing a few
that we haven't seen in quite a while.  I am not concerned, just curious
if others have noticed this also.

-Ryan

 
 
 
N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
Network Administrator
X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.XRite.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This item contains active content that can not be displayed in the preview pane. Open the item to read its content.

[Marc Mearns]

User Group


Please can any one help.

Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.4527
Windows 2000 SP2


When a user looks at a PowerPoint Presentation in a Public folder they get the message 
"This item contains active content that can not be displayed in the preview pane. Open 
the item to read its content." I do believe that PowerPoint does have java script in 
its content but I would expect some consistency. 

Other types of documents seem to be OK.

If the user uses another machine she does not get the problem.

I have recreated the Outlook profile on the offending machine but this does not fix 
the problem.

I have looked on Technet at Q articles Q241205/Q231989 and Q171372

Deleted the frmscache.dat file it just creates a new file.


Any positive or constructive comments would be much appreciated.



Regards

Marc Mearns

Mobile - 07775-630508
Office  - 020 7695 0286 


**

 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
 are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
 the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ).

 The format of address is:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
 MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

 J Sainsbury plc  (185647 England)
 Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited  (3261722 England)

 Registered Offices:
 33 Holborn
 London
 EC1N 2HT

**

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Extract GAL from E2k and import into 5.5

[MS Exchange Mailing List]

I went ahead and just wrote a script that exports users info from AD and
creates a csv file that is suitable for import to Exchange 5.5

Thanks Chris

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:21 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: Extract GAL from E2k and import into 5.5
Subject: Re: Extract GAL from E2k and import into 5.5


Depends on what 'don't have communication' means, but under most
interpretations... No. Perhaps some additional information could be
helpful in obtaining a suitable answer.

On 1/14/03 8:34, "MS Exchange Mailing List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Can ADC be used if the Exchange 5.5 and 2k server don't have 
communication? 

-Original Message- 
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Monday, January 13, 2003 5:53 PM 
Posted To: MS Exchange Mailing List 
Conversation: Extract GAL from E2k and import into 5.5 
Subject: Re: Extract GAL from E2k and import into 5.5 


ADC 

On 1/13/03 14:22, "MS Exchange Mailing List" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 



I need to extract all of our users from our Exchange 2000 GAL and import


them into an Exchange 5.5 server.  What is the best method for this? 




_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Anyone tried a tablet?

[Dflorea]

Finding the battery compartment is tough, though.

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone tried a tablet?
Sensitivity: Private


I buy them at 10 for 99 cents at Office Depot.  Mine work with pens or
pencils.

Ed Crowley
HP Services

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT)
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Anyone tried a tablet?
Sensitivity: Private


We have a Toshiba tablet PC for eval.  Nice toy, can see some benefits.
I personally would wait a while before buying one.

I would like to get a look at the HP/Compaq.  The reviews on this tend
to be opposing (It's fast!  It's slow!  It's great!  It sucks!).

SO,

Anyone used a tablet pc?  Got one?  Hated it?  Comments?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC 2003

[Seitz, Peter]

Ee.

> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC 2003
> 
> 
> That's not honey
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:39 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: MEC 2003
> 
> 
> Mmm..  With honey?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:36 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: MEC 2003
> 
> 
> I think its rolled in oats.
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:34 AM
> Subject: MEC 2003
> 
> 
> Is it rolled in with TechEd this year?
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

use HiddenMessages Collection from cdo event script ?

[Herold Heiko]

I need to build a cdo event script which fires every couple of hours.
I need to keep some persistant information (not lots of data, just some
flags) between invocations.
Would it be advisable or even possible access the HiddenMessages object
collection, add some normal mailitems and keep the data in the body (or some
other fields) of those items ?

Or should I avoid that kind of solution, and use a hidden subfolder, and
insert the messages there (normal Messages collection) ?

Or something different altogether ?

Thanks
Heiko

-- 
-- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Via Ferretto, 1ph  x39-041-5907073
-- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472
-- ITALY

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Virus activity

[Ryan Fennema]

Is anyone else out there noticing a higher level of virus activity in
the last week or so?  Our gateway scanner has been catching an
increasing number of viruses over the last week.  I am also seeing a few
that we haven't seen in quite a while.  I am not concerned, just curious
if others have noticed this also.

-Ryan

 
 
 
N. Ryan Fennema, MCSE
Network Administrator
X-Rite Incorporated - Grandville, MI
Phone: (616) 257-2165 Fax: (616) 257-2165
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.XRite.com

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: one more SMTP puzzle

[Chris Scharff]

Has your 'friend' been playing around with security policies?

On 1/15/03 8:52, "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



This time I am helping a friend of mine. His Exchange 2000 server has been
running fine until recently. Now he can'e receive mail from most places.

He could not receive mail from my Exchange server for example. Or from
Yahoo, AOL, etc. 

I narrowed it down to his virtual SMTP server. It does not like when someone
says EHLO to it and immediately drops connection.

220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version:
5.0.2195.53 
29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:28:08 -0500 
EHLO andrey_pc 
500 Failed to exchange X-LSA info, closing transmission channel 

Connection to host lost. 


When I say HELO, everything works fine -- 

220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version:
5.0.2195.53 
29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:29:31 -0500 
helo andrey_pc 
250 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Hello [207.21.208.111] 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: one more SMTP puzzle

[Chris Scharff]

BTW, seems to work fine from here:

220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version:
5.0.2195.5329 ready at  Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:21:29 -0500 
ehlo foo.bar
250-web01.domain.mistrycc.com Hello [216.30.136.98]
250-TURN
250-ATRN
250-SIZE
250-ETRN
250-PIPELINING
250-DSN
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-8bitmime
250-BINARYMIME
250-CHUNKING
250-VRFY
250-X-EXPS GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN
250-X-EXPS=LOGIN
250-AUTH GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN
250-AUTH=LOGIN
250-X-LINK2STATE
250-XEXCH50
250 OK


On 1/15/03 8:52, "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



This time I am helping a friend of mine. His Exchange 2000 server has been
running fine until recently. Now he can'e receive mail from most places.

He could not receive mail from my Exchange server for example. Or from
Yahoo, AOL, etc. 

I narrowed it down to his virtual SMTP server. It does not like when someone
says EHLO to it and immediately drops connection.

220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version:
5.0.2195.53 
29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:28:08 -0500 
EHLO andrey_pc 
500 Failed to exchange X-LSA info, closing transmission channel 

Connection to host lost. 


When I say HELO, everything works fine -- 

220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version:
5.0.2195.53 
29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:29:31 -0500 
helo andrey_pc 
250 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Hello [207.21.208.111] 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Accept only Encrypted MAPI connections

[Chris Scharff]

Why would you want to? And if you did, would you then be able to use a
shorter sig/disclaimer?

On 1/15/03 5:20, "Andrea Coppini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Hi, 

I just found out how to encrypt Outlook <> Exchange communication (ye I 
know it's simple, but I just couldn't see the checkbox...I guess it's 
"GUI Dyslexia" or something) 

Now I want to block all UNENCRYPTED communication, so Outlook MUST be 
set to encrypt, otherwise it won't connect. 

Andrea Coppini 
+356 79 ANDREA (263732) 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND 

iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and 
growing new businesses.  iWG founders are pioneers in creating 
multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and 
the US. 

The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche 
Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, 
Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. 

www.iWG.info 

www.countryprofiler.com/iWG 

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. 
If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible 
for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver 
this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message 
and kindly notify the sender by reply email. 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC 2003

[Martin Blackstone]

That's not honey

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2003


Mmm..  With honey?

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MEC 2003


I think its rolled in oats.

- Original Message - 
From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:34 AM
Subject: MEC 2003


Is it rolled in with TechEd this year?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MEC 2003

[Martin Blackstone]

Its rolled into a blunt

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC 2003


Is it rolled in with TechEd this year?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1

[Chris Scharff]

Sounds like the DNS issue others have mentioned previously then perhaps.
Ripped out the TCP/IP stack yet and reinstalled/reconfigured it?

On 1/14/03 21:38, "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Yes has proper credentials. I can log in to same account from 3 different
systems no problem. I can't figure out why I cannot log in g=from this one.
It's my Boss's workstation scratching hard drive may not go over to well!!

-Original Message- 
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:22 PM 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Subject: Re: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1 


Wrong address list... Are you sure he has the proper credentials? 

On 1/14/03 9:24, "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 



No still no luck. I did change the password auth to none in advance. Now it 
does ask me for login credentials takes them and returns me the wrong 
address list to resolve name to. It's my boss's workstation. Was on exchange

5.5 that server was removed no migration (not needed) and thenset up new box

on Ex2k hosted box. Really weird problem. I set up his laptop at his desk 
and hooked up outllok to the new server. No problems. No fire wall running 
on workstation that has problem. 

Need to get resolved with out reformatting workstation. Oh what a drag!! 

-Original Message- 
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:34 AM 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Subject: Re: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1 


So http://server/exchange/smtp_local-part didn’t work? Hmm... I’m more than 
a little troubled by that idea. 


On 1/12/03 12:41, "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 



Bingo Thanks Kevin that got IE to work. Gave me username and password prompt


logged into correct mailbox. 
Outlook still not asking me to login. Any Ideas?!! 

  -Original Message- 
   From: Kevin Rutledge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Sun 1/12/2003 11:30 AM 
   To: Matt 
   Cc: 
   Subject: RE: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1 




  It seems odd that Netscape works, but IE doesn't. Makes me think 
there 
is an intergrated log on happening using network credentials.  Have 
you 
tried reseting the IE security settings to default for the internet 
zone?  There is an option to prompt for password or log on 
automatically 
in the security settings. 

-Kevin 

> -Original Message- 
> From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Posted At: Sunday, January 12, 2003 4:38 AM 
> Posted To: Exchange 
> Conversation: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1 
> Subject: RE: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1 
> 
> 
> Not Dns..I have three other workstations hat work with this 
> problem mailbox. It is directly related to this one 
> workstation not asking for username and password!! 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 6:41 PM 
> To: Exchange Discussions 
> Subject: RE: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1 
> 
> 
> Check the DNS settings. 
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I 
> Tech Consultant 
> hp Services 
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! 
> 
> 
> -Original Message- 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt 
> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 2:33 PM 
> To: Exchange Discussions 
> Subject: RE: owa outlook 2002 outlook 2000 sr1 
> 
> 
> OK maybe I did not explain myself well enough. It is only 
> this one workstation. IE thru OWA does log me into the wrong 
> mailbox (because I am never prompted for a username password) 
> and outlook 2002 will not let me log into the correct mailbox 
> either.  I've set up 3 other workstations all 3 can log into 
> this particular mailbox.  My problem I am trying to resolve 
> is getting this problem workstation running XP pro and 
> outlook 2002 and IE 6.x (whatever) to login into the correct 
mailbox. 
> 
> With username and password not being asked for I cannot log 
> into the proper mailbox. Remember this is a hosted exchange. 
> When I launch outlook 2002 I can pick the wrong mailbox. But 
> since my credentials seem to have already been passed onto 
> the exchange server I'm stuck on looking at one global 
> address list and not the address list I need to long into the 
> problem mailbox from this workstation. Same problem with IE. 
   > I loaded Netscape On this workstation and I get into the 
> proper OWA mailbox. Exchange is fine..the problem is not on 
> the servers it 

RE: MEC 2003

[Woodruff, Michael]

Mmm..  With honey?

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MEC 2003


I think its rolled in oats.

- Original Message - 
From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:34 AM
Subject: MEC 2003


Is it rolled in with TechEd this year?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MEC 2003

[Andy David]

I think its rolled in oats.

- Original Message - 
From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:34 AM
Subject: MEC 2003


Is it rolled in with TechEd this year?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: one more SMTP puzzle

[Busby, Jacob]

> I narrowed it down to his virtual SMTP server. It does not 
> like when someone says EHLO to it and immediately drops connection.
> 
> 220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, 
> Version: 5.0.2195.53
> 29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:28:08 -0500
> EHLO andrey_pc
> 500 Failed to exchange X-LSA info, closing transmission channel
> 
> Connection to host lost.
> 
> 
> When I say HELO, everything works fine --
> 
> 220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, 
> Version: 5.0.2195.53
> 29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:29:31 -0500
> helo andrey_pc
> 250 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Hello [207.21.208.111] 

Sounds like something in your set-up complies with RFC821 but not RFC2821. Can't think 
of any tests off-hand that would confirm this though.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

MEC 2003

[Woodruff, Michael]

Is it rolled in with TechEd this year?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

one more SMTP puzzle

[Andrey Fyodorov]

This time I am helping a friend of mine. His Exchange 2000 server has been running 
fine until recently. Now he can'e receive mail from most places.

He could not receive mail from my Exchange server for example. Or from Yahoo, AOL, etc.

I narrowed it down to his virtual SMTP server. It does not like when someone says EHLO 
to it and immediately drops connection.

220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 5.0.2195.53
29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:28:08 -0500
EHLO andrey_pc
500 Failed to exchange X-LSA info, closing transmission channel

Connection to host lost.


When I say HELO, everything works fine --

220 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 5.0.2195.53
29 ready at Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:29:31 -0500
helo andrey_pc
250 web01.domain.mistrycc.com Hello [207.21.208.111] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DNS and Exchange 5.5 grief

[AliAdmin]

All working now thanks, pesky firewall issues.

Bye

Ali
- Original Message -
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: DNS and Exchange 5.5 grief


> I can not telnet to port 25 on mail.bango.org (MX 10)
> I can however reach your secondary (MX 20) : bmx1.mail.lhr1.globix.net.
> Your mail is probably queued up there.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "AliAdmin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 10:22 AM
> Subject: Re: DNS and Exchange 5.5 grief
>
>
> > Well the working mail domain is Bango.net, the new one is bango.org
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Ali
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:15 PM
> > Subject: Re: DNS and Exchange 5.5 grief
> >
> >
> > > What is the name of the domain in question?
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "AliAdmin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 6:48 AM
> > > Subject: DNS and Exchange 5.5 grief
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi All
> > > >
> > > > I've installed a new and completely separtate Exchange 5.5 sever on
an
> > > > completely separtate domain. I have inserted a MX record and A
record
> > for
> > > > the domain in the DNS and installed Internet Mail Service on the
> > Exchange
> > > > box.
> > > >
> > > > I can happily send mail to other mailboxes on the server and send
mail
> > > > sucessfully to external recipients. The problem lies in recieving
> > external
> > > > mail. The mail to the new server from an external source disappears.
> > They
> > > > neither reach the intended recipient nor the postmaster catch all
and
> no
> > > > undelivarable notice is bounced.
> > > >
> > > > As far as I can tell the server is configured correctly. Has anybody
> and
> > > > ideas where I can start to look.
> > > >
> > > > Many Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Alister Haran.
> > > > Bango.net
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _
> > > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _
> > > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > _
> > List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Anyone tried a tablet?

[Andrey Fyodorov]

I know of a couple companies in my town that sell tablet-based solutions to medical 
offices - wireless tablet connecting to SQL database, web, Exchange server, etc.

-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Anyone tried a tablet?


I have seen the last two models from Compaq and Toshiba as well.
I liked it physically, and am unsure what type of application it will be
used for.
I think there soon will be better technology that will work better for the
possible applications that the tablets use.

- Jason

- Original Message -
From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:25 PM
Subject: RE: Anyone tried a tablet?


Are their screens fragile?

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone tried a tablet?
Sensitivity: Private


I had a chance to try one out a Comdex. I liked everything about them
except for the handwriting recognition, it sucked. My handwriting is
crap thought so if you have pretty decent handwriting then it might be
something for you. I liked the HP/Compaq models cause they included a
keyboard. Oh and if you can get in on the beta test of the Microsoft
OneNote program I would fully recommend doing so. That program is
unbelievable.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT)
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Anyone tried a tablet?
Sensitivity: Private


We have a Toshiba tablet PC for eval.  Nice toy, can see some benefits.
I personally would wait a while before buying one.

I would like to get a look at the HP/Compaq.  The reviews on this tend
to be opposing (It's fast!  It's slow!  It's great!  It sucks!).

SO,

Anyone used a tablet pc?  Got one?  Hated it?  Comments?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS

[Reed, Alexander]

Forgive me:"ESM"  What is that?

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS


Properties -> permissions if you have it, or by going to the folder in ESM
and looking at client permissions.  Default should be listed near the top,
right next to Anonymous.

Default is what permissions your users will get if they are not explicitly
allowed or denied.

-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:52 PM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS
Subject: RE: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS


How would I be able to tell if that is the case?  You mean by going
to Calendar and right Clicking and going to properties?

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS


Make sure the permissions for Default don't allow them to do so.

-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:58 PM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS
Subject: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS


I am trying to set permissions so that no one can delete a set calendar
event on a resource conference room and users are able to delete events even
when they do not have permissions to the mailbox calendar.  (or so it
seems.)
Has anyone else experienced this?  I would appreciate any feedback on
the resolution to this.

   Thank You,
   Alex Reed

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS

[Ali Wilkes (IT)]

Properties -> permissions if you have it, or by going to the folder in
ESM and looking at client permissions.  Default should be listed near
the top, right next to Anonymous.

Default is what permissions your users will get if they are not
explicitly allowed or denied.

-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:52 PM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS
Subject: RE: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS


How would I be able to tell if that is the case?  You mean by
going to Calendar and right Clicking and going to properties?

-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS


Make sure the permissions for Default don't allow them to do so.

-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:58 PM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS
Subject: DELETING CALENDAR EVENTS


I am trying to set permissions so that no one can delete a set
calendar event on a resource conference room and users are able to
delete events even when they do not have permissions to the mailbox
calendar.  (or so it
seems.)
Has anyone else experienced this?  I would appreciate any feedback
on the resolution to this.

   Thank You,
   Alex Reed

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: RPC Question

[Roger Seielstad]

In NT and Win2k, RPC is encrypted between machines. I'd call it fairly weak
encryption, but its encrypted.

> -Original Message-
> From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:05 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RPC Question
> Sensitivity: Private
> 
> 
> Is RPC Encrypted?  If so how?  How strong is the Encryption?  
> I can't find
> whitepapers that talk about RPC.any help would be greatly 
> appreciated.
> 
> _
> List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: email address

[Woodruff, Michael]

Run the RUS and look for errors.

-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 6:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: email address


Dear List,

I have one email server on which exchange 2000 is installed. Now I have
installed an additional domain controller and installed e2k on it , I
have created email account on my newly installed server which is in the
same organization, but what I have noticed when I took the properties of
the account it is not showing the email address of the user, I waited
for 5 minutes but still no email address, due to that I am unable to use
the email account ,,, what could be the possible problem. Help in this
regards is appreciated.


Thanks in advance
Regards,
Irf.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Anyone tried a tablet?

[prontomail]

Tablets? As in .. pills?

Motrin is waay better that Tylenol :-P

deji
- Original Message - 
From: "Ali Wilkes (IT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 10:45 AM
Subject: OT: Anyone tried a tablet?


We have a Toshiba tablet PC for eval.  Nice toy, can see some benefits.
I personally would wait a while before buying one.

I would like to get a look at the HP/Compaq.  The reviews on this tend
to be opposing (It's fast!  It's slow!  It's great!  It sucks!).

SO,

Anyone used a tablet pc?  Got one?  Hated it?  Comments?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Accept only Encrypted MAPI connections

[Andrea Coppini]

OK, and my question is...

How do I do this?


-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini 
Sent: January 15, 2003 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Accept only Encrypted MAPI connections


Hi,

I just found out how to encrypt Outlook <> Exchange communication (ye I
know it's simple, but I just couldn't see the checkbox...I guess it's
"GUI Dyslexia" or something)

Now I want to block all UNENCRYPTED communication, so Outlook MUST be
set to encrypt, otherwise it won't connect.

Andrea Coppini
+356 79 ANDREA (263732)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND

iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and
growing new businesses.  iWG founders are pioneers in creating
multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and
the US.

The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche
Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust,
Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network.

www.iWG.info

www.countryprofiler.com/iWG

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver
this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message
and kindly notify the sender by reply email.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accept only Encrypted MAPI connections

[Andrea Coppini]

Hi,

I just found out how to encrypt Outlook <> Exchange communication (ye I
know it's simple, but I just couldn't see the checkbox...I guess it's
"GUI Dyslexia" or something)

Now I want to block all UNENCRYPTED communication, so Outlook MUST be
set to encrypt, otherwise it won't connect.

Andrea Coppini
+356 79 ANDREA (263732)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND

iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and
growing new businesses.  iWG founders are pioneers in creating
multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and
the US.

The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche
Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust,
Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network.

www.iWG.info

www.countryprofiler.com/iWG

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.
If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible
for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver
this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message
and kindly notify the sender by reply email.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

email address

[Exchange List]

Dear List,

I have one email server on which exchange 2000 is installed. Now I have installed an 
additional domain controller and installed e2k on it , I have created email account on 
my newly installed server which is in the same organization, but what I have noticed 
when I took the properties of the account it is not showing the email address of the 
user, I waited for 5 minutes but still no email address, due to that I am unable to 
use the email account ,,, what could be the possible problem. Help in this regards is 
appreciated.


Thanks in advance
Regards,
Irf.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]