Single instance storage anyway to revert?
MSX2000+SP3 1forest After moving from one mailbox store to a second (same server) all the mailboxes arrved to the new store with sizes at least twiece bigger as in the original, anyway to reduce or compress or set back to original size the mailbox sizes in the new store? Thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Error
I have a similar problem. When I use the logoff button, I get prompted to enter logon credentials. After 3 times, I get access denied. Q325906 states that the Integrated Windows Authentication should be cleared on the Front End servers. Our front end servers have this setting cleared but the problem still exists. Has anyone else experienced this problem? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Error http://pchelp.ncms.org/HelpDocs/ANN99/owa.htm http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/support/exchange/content/whi tepapers/owa_tshoot.asp#Logging -Original Message- From: Allen Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Error Hi, Starting from yesterday, I started receiving this error message. It looks like a permission problem but from what I see, it is all set correctly. Anybody knwo what else could be causing the problem? Below is the error I receive when I try to goto the OWA on our website. error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/logon.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. Thank you, Allen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems with ADC Public Folder CA...
Hi folks: I am re-posting this. I sent it several hours ago, but it never arrived. I have configured a PF CA between an Exchange 5.5 server and the Active Directory. The user account I am using on the Exchange 5.5 side is the service account. The account to Windows is a member of Domain Admins. The other CA's for recipients, DLs, and custom recipients work just fine. W2K SP3 on all servers E2K SP3 and the E2K SP3 version of the ADC E2K is in "mixed mode" AD (only one domain) is in "native mode" Only 1 E2K server currently installed When the ADC PF CA runs, none of the folders are showing up in the domain's Microsoft Exchange System Objects container. I can see the public folders from Exchange 5.5 in Exchange System Manager in the Public Folders container, but they are not "mail-enabled". In event viewer, I see errors when the PF CA runs. The event ids are 8183 and 8270. Both of these errors indicate a problem with the account used by the ADC to connect to the Exchange 5.5 server. But the errors only display for system folders, not the regular public folders. However, the regular public folder directory information is NOT replicating to AD from 5.5. KB article 329047 suggests that the account has insufficient permissions, but it already has Service Account Admin on 5.5. Just for grins, we tried changing the account we were using to an account with just Permissions Admin. No dice. There are no errors that would indicate why we are not seeing the public folders in Microsoft Exchange System Objects. Any ideas? I'm tapped out. I have done a KB search, a Google search and looked through the list archives, but nothing seems relevant. Thanks! Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Error
http://pchelp.ncms.org/HelpDocs/ANN99/owa.htm http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/support/exchange/content/whi tepapers/owa_tshoot.asp#Logging -Original Message- From: Allen Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Error Hi, Starting from yesterday, I started receiving this error message. It looks like a permission problem but from what I see, it is all set correctly. Anybody knwo what else could be causing the problem? Below is the error I receive when I try to goto the OWA on our website. error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/logon.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. Thank you, Allen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Error
Hi, Starting from yesterday, I started receiving this error message. It looks like a permission problem but from what I see, it is all set correctly. Anybody knwo what else could be causing the problem? Below is the error I receive when I try to goto the OWA on our website. error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/logon.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. Thank you, Allen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migration Scenario
I wouldn't propose that I know enough about what you're doing to make a recommendation. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nuzman Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Migration Scenario Ed, For Exchange I agree with you. How about a Novell 4.11 to AD migration? That one I'm doing clean. Norris - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 3:47 PM Subject: RE: Migration Scenario > I seldom believe a "fresh start" is worth the extra effort required of > end users to deal with it. I believe it's usually easier to delete > the legacy junk you don't want to keep, something you should have been > doing all along through normal maintenenace. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bennett, > Joshua > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:26 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Migration Scenario > > > Hello all, > > Just wanted to bounce my plan for migrating from Ex 5.5 to 2000 to get > some feedback. > > I plan to bring up AD and EX2000 totally separate of the existing > production NT4/Ex5.5 multi-master domain structure (we are slimming > down from 8 NT domains to 1 AD Forest w/ 1 domain). I plan so migrate > the NT user accounts SID history and mail-enable all the new AD > accounts. I then plan to disable the IMC in Ex5.5 and export all the > users mailboxes to PST files and re-import them to their new Ex2K > mailboxes. The same will be done for all PF that we will carry > forward. > > I am thinking along these lines because I feel that an ADC will import > too much old legacy junk that we don't want on the new mail system. > > Am I missing any gotcha's here? Does what I propose to do sound > feasible? > > Thanks in advance for any an all advice offered. > > Josh Bennett > Exchange Admin\Systems Engineer > Cotelligent, Inc. > 401 Parkway Drive > Broomall, PA. 19008 > 610-359-5929 > www.cotelligent.com > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blackberry still (partially) down?
Aether is the provider and the units are 957's with wireless service provided by Cingular. Tom -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 5:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Are those folks on Bell South? We have a user who just contacted me this morning to tell me her Blackberry isn't receiving; I'm pretty sure she's a Bell South connected customer. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > > -Original Message- > From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:04 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > We still have 2 blackberry users who are not receiving messages. Mine > started working last night at about 8:00pm. > A few were fixed today by doing a master reset (paperclip in the hole > in the back) and then going to options/network settings and clicking > the wheel and choosing "register now". > > > There are still 2 units that have messages pending. Aether tech > support claims that some are still backlogged and we should just wait > a while. They cannot even receive APB's or pin to pin messages (in > addition to not receiving messages from the blackberry enterprise > server). Maybe these two will fix themselves by Monday... > > Tom > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migration Scenario
Ed, For Exchange I agree with you. How about a Novell 4.11 to AD migration? That one I'm doing clean. Norris - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 3:47 PM Subject: RE: Migration Scenario > I seldom believe a "fresh start" is worth the extra effort required of > end users to deal with it. I believe it's usually easier to delete the > legacy junk you don't want to keep, something you should have been doing > all along through normal maintenenace. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bennett, Joshua > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:26 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Migration Scenario > > > Hello all, > > Just wanted to bounce my plan for migrating from Ex 5.5 to 2000 to get > some feedback. > > I plan to bring up AD and EX2000 totally separate of the existing > production NT4/Ex5.5 multi-master domain structure (we are slimming down > from 8 NT domains to 1 AD Forest w/ 1 domain). I plan so migrate the NT > user accounts SID history and mail-enable all the new AD accounts. I > then plan to disable the IMC in Ex5.5 and export all the users mailboxes > to PST files and re-import them to their new Ex2K mailboxes. The same > will be done for all PF that we will carry forward. > > I am thinking along these lines because I feel that an ADC will import > too much old legacy junk that we don't want on the new mail system. > > Am I missing any gotcha's here? Does what I propose to do sound > feasible? > > Thanks in advance for any an all advice offered. > > Josh Bennett > Exchange Admin\Systems Engineer > Cotelligent, Inc. > 401 Parkway Drive > Broomall, PA. 19008 > 610-359-5929 > www.cotelligent.com > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blackberry still (partially) down?
http://news.com.com/2100-1040-984683.html?tag=fd_top -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blackberry still (partially) down? We still have 2 blackberry users who are not receiving messages. Mine started working last night at about 8:00pm. A few were fixed today by doing a master reset (paperclip in the hole in the back) and then going to options/network settings and clicking the wheel and choosing "register now". There are still 2 units that have messages pending. Aether tech support claims that some are still backlogged and we should just wait a while. They cannot even receive APB's or pin to pin messages (in addition to not receiving messages from the blackberry enterprise server). Maybe these two will fix themselves by Monday... Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Office 11 beta broke my Blackberry Intellisync???
I cant confirm that it's a problem, but I could certainly see it happening. Since the sync software is so intertwined with OL, there could easily be issues. My advise would be to call BB and ask them what they have seen. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Office 11 beta broke my Blackberry Intellisync??? I got the "free" CD set (paid for shipping) with exchange2003, server2003 and office2003 betas. I loaded the office beta on my desktop PC and now (maybe coincidentally or not) I can no longer sync in the cradle. When I go to the PIM settings it will not allow me to select "outlook" as a choice (the OK button is greyed out) for the notepad, mail or tasks. The calendar is still set to wireless sync which is working. Our BES server is 2.1 sp5 and I just loaded the 3.5a desktop on my pc to see if that helped (it did not). I did load the 3.5 desktop on another pc with office 2000 loaded and the unit will sync up fine on that machine. Can anyone confirm that the problem is between office 11 beta and the blackberry desktop?? I'm sure Aether would just tell me to uninstall the beta software. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office 11 beta broke my Blackberry Intellisync???
I got the "free" CD set (paid for shipping) with exchange2003, server2003 and office2003 betas. I loaded the office beta on my desktop PC and now (maybe coincidentally or not) I can no longer sync in the cradle. When I go to the PIM settings it will not allow me to select "outlook" as a choice (the OK button is greyed out) for the notepad, mail or tasks. The calendar is still set to wireless sync which is working. Our BES server is 2.1 sp5 and I just loaded the 3.5a desktop on my pc to see if that helped (it did not). I did load the 3.5 desktop on another pc with office 2000 loaded and the unit will sync up fine on that machine. Can anyone confirm that the problem is between office 11 beta and the blackberry desktop?? I'm sure Aether would just tell me to uninstall the beta software. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blackberry still (partially) down?
Are those folks on Bell South? We have a user who just contacted me this morning to tell me her Blackberry isn't receiving; I'm pretty sure she's a Bell South connected customer. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > > -Original Message- > From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:04 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > We still have 2 blackberry users who are not receiving > messages. Mine started working last night at about 8:00pm. > A few were fixed today by doing a master reset (paperclip in > the hole in the back) and then going to options/network > settings and clicking the wheel and choosing "register now". > > > There are still 2 units that have messages pending. Aether > tech support claims that some are still backlogged and we > should just wait a while. They cannot even receive APB's or > pin to pin messages (in addition to not receiving messages > from the blackberry enterprise server). Maybe these two will > fix themselves by Monday... > > Tom > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blackberry still (partially) down?
We still have 2 blackberry users who are not receiving messages. Mine started working last night at about 8:00pm. A few were fixed today by doing a master reset (paperclip in the hole in the back) and then going to options/network settings and clicking the wheel and choosing "register now". There are still 2 units that have messages pending. Aether tech support claims that some are still backlogged and we should just wait a while. They cannot even receive APB's or pin to pin messages (in addition to not receiving messages from the blackberry enterprise server). Maybe these two will fix themselves by Monday... Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migration Scenario
I seldom believe a "fresh start" is worth the extra effort required of end users to deal with it. I believe it's usually easier to delete the legacy junk you don't want to keep, something you should have been doing all along through normal maintenenace. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bennett, Joshua Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Migration Scenario Hello all, Just wanted to bounce my plan for migrating from Ex 5.5 to 2000 to get some feedback. I plan to bring up AD and EX2000 totally separate of the existing production NT4/Ex5.5 multi-master domain structure (we are slimming down from 8 NT domains to 1 AD Forest w/ 1 domain). I plan so migrate the NT user accounts SID history and mail-enable all the new AD accounts. I then plan to disable the IMC in Ex5.5 and export all the users mailboxes to PST files and re-import them to their new Ex2K mailboxes. The same will be done for all PF that we will carry forward. I am thinking along these lines because I feel that an ADC will import too much old legacy junk that we don't want on the new mail system. Am I missing any gotcha's here? Does what I propose to do sound feasible? Thanks in advance for any an all advice offered. Josh Bennett Exchange Admin\Systems Engineer Cotelligent, Inc. 401 Parkway Drive Broomall, PA. 19008 610-359-5929 www.cotelligent.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting both Information Stores?
As to the philosophy of disabling services you don't need, feel free to stop and disable the Event Service if you don't have any event scripts installed. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? Thanks Ed - I found that out the fun way :-) Looks like the Event Service needs the Public IS as well? I may just remove the Event Service (as this is primarily a connector server) and then remove the Public IS totally. Am I right in thinking that the eventconfig public folder has to live on the relevent server, whereas setting the "Public Folder Server" value on the Private IS properties controls where new user-created public folders default to? regards Paul -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] The IMS requires the store. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? Misguided logic I think - if I don't need to use does it need to be there was my theory, but playing with the IMS and the event service shows they (appear to) need to be there even if they're empty. regards Paul -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] Paul: Yes, both of the stores can be deleted, but I have never had to delete them both at the same time. Just out of curiosity, why do you want to delete both stores? Couldn't shutting down the Information Store service accomplish the same thing? (Unless the services you are running depend on the IS?) Thanks, Jim -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Deleting both Information Stores? Subject: Deleting both Information Stores? New 5.5 SP4 server, it's just going to run connectors. I've deleted the Private IS, now I want to remove the Public IS. The Paul Robichaux implies they can both be deleted, but when I try to do so I get the message "You cannot remove the last information store from a server". Any ideas, or can it just not be done? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting both Information Stores?
If you don't have an IS, you don't need the Event Service, since you won't have anything to generate events. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? Thanks Ed - I found that out the fun way :-) Looks like the Event Service needs the Public IS as well? I may just remove the Event Service (as this is primarily a connector server) and then remove the Public IS totally. Am I right in thinking that the eventconfig public folder has to live on the relevent server, whereas setting the "Public Folder Server" value on the Private IS properties controls where new user-created public folders default to? regards Paul -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] The IMS requires the store. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? Misguided logic I think - if I don't need to use does it need to be there was my theory, but playing with the IMS and the event service shows they (appear to) need to be there even if they're empty. regards Paul -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] Paul: Yes, both of the stores can be deleted, but I have never had to delete them both at the same time. Just out of curiosity, why do you want to delete both stores? Couldn't shutting down the Information Store service accomplish the same thing? (Unless the services you are running depend on the IS?) Thanks, Jim -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Deleting both Information Stores? Subject: Deleting both Information Stores? New 5.5 SP4 server, it's just going to run connectors. I've deleted the Private IS, now I want to remove the Public IS. The Paul Robichaux implies they can both be deleted, but when I try to do so I get the message "You cannot remove the last information store from a server". Any ideas, or can it just not be done? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K OWA & timeouts
Limiting connection timeout in IIS does not solve the problem. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Marriott Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts That is an HTTP thing. Limit connection timeout in IIS. There are 3rd party products too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts Of logons so that when #$%@! idio^H^H^H^H users walk away from logged on sessions someone can't walk in behind them and have their session. -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts Timeout of what? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K OWA & timeouts We are looking for a solution to E2K OWA's lack of a timeout feature. We are currently looking at several options, but I thought I'd ask the list what they are doing? Suggestions? Experiences (good or bad)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K OWA & timeouts
We've front ended ours with an ISA server with RSA authentication. Timeouts can be set to either x minutes of non-usage (or will be once they fix a little bug) or x minutes of usage. Once it's timed out, you're done. There is also a piece of sample code that they give you that can wipe the session cookie out of memory so once the user hits the logoff page, they're done. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts This has always been an issue with OWA and why some companies flat out refuse to use it. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts Thanks for trying but at the end of that Q article: NOTE: The above setting has to do with the connection between the client and the server and it does not affect authentication in any way. When you set the user context time-out to a number, even if this time-out passes, the client browser will still have the user's credentials cached and the user will not be prompted for credentials.. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts You might give Q294752 a try. I have to say though, it didn't work for me. I personally like Ed's solution the best. Aaron -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts Ken: Are you looking at MessageWare (http://www.messageware.com)? I have not worked with them personally, but I know a couple of folks that have had good things to say about them. Of course, you could always wait for Exchange 2003. :-) Jim -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 6:36 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: E2K OWA & timeouts Subject: E2K OWA & timeouts We are looking for a solution to E2K OWA's lack of a timeout feature. We are currently looking at several options, but I thought I'd ask the list what they are doing? Suggestions? Experiences (good or bad)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Active Directory CA_ connection agreement & ADSI
Hello all We're migrating our mailboxes from Exchange 5.5 to 2000. We've built out the 2000 server. We're now getting event log errors for an Active Directory CA_ connection agreement (the one added automatically when installing Exchange 2k) as described in this Q article: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;319889 We need help editing the attributes listed in the article (ex: msexchserver1exportcontainer) so that we are pointing to the right Exchange container and OU. Your help and thoughts are appreciated. Thanks, -Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Migration Scenario
Hello all, Just wanted to bounce my plan for migrating from Ex 5.5 to 2000 to get some feedback. I plan to bring up AD and EX2000 totally separate of the existing production NT4/Ex5.5 multi-master domain structure (we are slimming down from 8 NT domains to 1 AD Forest w/ 1 domain). I plan so migrate the NT user accounts SID history and mail-enable all the new AD accounts. I then plan to disable the IMC in Ex5.5 and export all the users mailboxes to PST files and re-import them to their new Ex2K mailboxes. The same will be done for all PF that we will carry forward. I am thinking along these lines because I feel that an ADC will import too much old legacy junk that we don't want on the new mail system. Am I missing any gotcha's here? Does what I propose to do sound feasible? Thanks in advance for any an all advice offered. Josh Bennett Exchange Admin\Systems Engineer Cotelligent, Inc. 401 Parkway Drive Broomall, PA. 19008 610-359-5929 www.cotelligent.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Needing help on mail format...
Andy That is right... No wonder they call you "the MAN"... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Needing help on mail format... Oy. Not necessary. Since I havent used Outlook 98 since, well, 98, I can only guess that its grayed out because you are using Word as your email editor. - Original Message - From: "Friese, Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:07 PM Subject: RE: Needing help on mail format... make sure the user has admins rights to the local machine -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Needing help on mail format... I guess you couldn't se that the mailformat box is grayed out??? Why would that be? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Exchange Discussions; MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Needing help on mail format... Outlook 98 NT 4.0 SP4 Good afternoon, I have a user that reports as follows: User is needing to be able to change her TEXT FORMAT from RICH TEXT to PLAIN TEXT when working in OUTLOOK. Please assist. When I go to Tools>>Options>>Mail Format the following screen appears: <<...OLE_Obj...>> As you can see the Send in this message format drop down box is grayed out. Why would this be? Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Messaging Transaction Volume Monitoring and Reporting
Jim: If you have big bucks and want comprehensive reports on EVERYTHING, look to something like NetIQ (http://www.netiq.com). Some other interesting solutions include Promodag (www.promodag.com), MELIA (www.sunbeltsoftware.com is the best place I know to find info about it), and OmniAnalyser (http://www.hypersoft.com). There are a couple of other products that you might consider, too. I tested Promodag, but used the Access database rather than the SQL database. In the environment I tested it in, (700 - 4000 messages per hour per server with 4 servers) the Access database really ran out of steam after we loaded up about 15 days worth of data. Hope this helps, Jim -Original Message- From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:34 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Messaging Transaction Volume Monitoring and Reporting Subject: Messaging Transaction Volume Monitoring and Reporting Does anyone out there perform monitoring, logging, and reporting for the number of message transactions happening on E2K server? If so, what techniques and tools have served you well? Thanks in advance, Jim Collins Sr. Systems Engineer Competitive Computing, Inc. www.competitive.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question
Thanks all for your help with this question and your other comments. Norris Carden www.rasquel.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messaging Transaction Volume Monitoring and Reporting
Does anyone out there perform monitoring, logging, and reporting for the number of message transactions happening on E2K server? If so, what techniques and tools have served you well? Thanks in advance, Jim Collins Sr. Systems Engineer Competitive Computing, Inc. www.competitive.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting both Information Stores?
Thanks Ed - I found that out the fun way :-) Looks like the Event Service needs the Public IS as well? I may just remove the Event Service (as this is primarily a connector server) and then remove the Public IS totally. Am I right in thinking that the eventconfig public folder has to live on the relevent server, whereas setting the "Public Folder Server" value on the Private IS properties controls where new user-created public folders default to? regards Paul -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] The IMS requires the store. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? Misguided logic I think - if I don't need to use does it need to be there was my theory, but playing with the IMS and the event service shows they (appear to) need to be there even if they're empty. regards Paul -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] Paul: Yes, both of the stores can be deleted, but I have never had to delete them both at the same time. Just out of curiosity, why do you want to delete both stores? Couldn't shutting down the Information Store service accomplish the same thing? (Unless the services you are running depend on the IS?) Thanks, Jim -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Deleting both Information Stores? Subject: Deleting both Information Stores? New 5.5 SP4 server, it's just going to run connectors. I've deleted the Private IS, now I want to remove the Public IS. The Paul Robichaux implies they can both be deleted, but when I try to do so I get the message "You cannot remove the last information store from a server". Any ideas, or can it just not be done? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K OWA & timeouts
This has always been an issue with OWA and why some companies flat out refuse to use it. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts Thanks for trying but at the end of that Q article: NOTE: The above setting has to do with the connection between the client and the server and it does not affect authentication in any way. When you set the user context time-out to a number, even if this time-out passes, the client browser will still have the user's credentials cached and the user will not be prompted for credentials.. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts You might give Q294752 a try. I have to say though, it didn't work for me. I personally like Ed's solution the best. Aaron -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts Ken: Are you looking at MessageWare (http://www.messageware.com)? I have not worked with them personally, but I know a couple of folks that have had good things to say about them. Of course, you could always wait for Exchange 2003. :-) Jim -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 6:36 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: E2K OWA & timeouts Subject: E2K OWA & timeouts We are looking for a solution to E2K OWA's lack of a timeout feature. We are currently looking at several options, but I thought I'd ask the list what they are doing? Suggestions? Experiences (good or bad)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K OWA & timeouts
Thanks for trying but at the end of that Q article: NOTE: The above setting has to do with the connection between the client and the server and it does not affect authentication in any way. When you set the user context time-out to a number, even if this time-out passes, the client browser will still have the user's credentials cached and the user will not be prompted for credentials.. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts You might give Q294752 a try. I have to say though, it didn't work for me. I personally like Ed's solution the best. Aaron -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts Ken: Are you looking at MessageWare (http://www.messageware.com)? I have not worked with them personally, but I know a couple of folks that have had good things to say about them. Of course, you could always wait for Exchange 2003. :-) Jim -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 6:36 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: E2K OWA & timeouts Subject: E2K OWA & timeouts We are looking for a solution to E2K OWA's lack of a timeout feature. We are currently looking at several options, but I thought I'd ask the list what they are doing? Suggestions? Experiences (good or bad)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K OWA & timeouts
They are on the short list. I was hoping to hear about them. -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts Ken: Are you looking at MessageWare (http://www.messageware.com)? I have not worked with them personally, but I know a couple of folks that have had good things to say about them. Of course, you could always wait for Exchange 2003. :-) Jim -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 6:36 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: E2K OWA & timeouts Subject: E2K OWA & timeouts We are looking for a solution to E2K OWA's lack of a timeout feature. We are currently looking at several options, but I thought I'd ask the list what they are doing? Suggestions? Experiences (good or bad)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K OWA & timeouts
That is an HTTP thing. Limit connection timeout in IIS. There are 3rd party products too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts Of logons so that when #$%@! idio^H^H^H^H users walk away from logged on sessions someone can't walk in behind them and have their session. -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts Timeout of what? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K OWA & timeouts We are looking for a solution to E2K OWA's lack of a timeout feature. We are currently looking at several options, but I thought I'd ask the list what they are doing? Suggestions? Experiences (good or bad)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K OWA & timeouts
I'm looking for solutions for our Internet OWA servers. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts Schedule periodic reboots of the client computer in question. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K OWA & timeouts We are looking for a solution to E2K OWA's lack of a timeout feature. We are currently looking at several options, but I thought I'd ask the list what they are doing? Suggestions? Experiences (good or bad)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting both Information Stores?
I do follow your logic on "if it ain't used, don't run it!". I subscribe to that myself. Sometimes great care has to be taken when determining which services are necessary and which are not. I have had a couple of interesting experiences disabling services on Exchange 2000. :-) Yep, the IMS puts all inbound mail in to the private information store, so it is required if the server is running an IMS. -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:15 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Deleting both Information Stores? Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? Misguided logic I think - if I don't need to use does it need to be there was my theory, but playing with the IMS and the event service shows they (appear to) need to be there even if they're empty. regards Paul -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] Paul: Yes, both of the stores can be deleted, but I have never had to delete them both at the same time. Just out of curiosity, why do you want to delete both stores? Couldn't shutting down the Information Store service accomplish the same thing? (Unless the services you are running depend on the IS?) Thanks, Jim -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Deleting both Information Stores? Subject: Deleting both Information Stores? New 5.5 SP4 server, it's just going to run connectors. I've deleted the Private IS, now I want to remove the Public IS. The Paul Robichaux implies they can both be deleted, but when I try to do so I get the message "You cannot remove the last information store from a server". Any ideas, or can it just not be done? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K OWA & timeouts
Of logons so that when #$%@! idio^H^H^H^H users walk away from logged on sessions someone can't walk in behind them and have their session. -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts Timeout of what? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K OWA & timeouts We are looking for a solution to E2K OWA's lack of a timeout feature. We are currently looking at several options, but I thought I'd ask the list what they are doing? Suggestions? Experiences (good or bad)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting both Information Stores?
The IMS requires the store. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? Misguided logic I think - if I don't need to use does it need to be there was my theory, but playing with the IMS and the event service shows they (appear to) need to be there even if they're empty. regards Paul -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] Paul: Yes, both of the stores can be deleted, but I have never had to delete them both at the same time. Just out of curiosity, why do you want to delete both stores? Couldn't shutting down the Information Store service accomplish the same thing? (Unless the services you are running depend on the IS?) Thanks, Jim -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Deleting both Information Stores? Subject: Deleting both Information Stores? New 5.5 SP4 server, it's just going to run connectors. I've deleted the Private IS, now I want to remove the Public IS. The Paul Robichaux implies they can both be deleted, but when I try to do so I get the message "You cannot remove the last information store from a server". Any ideas, or can it just not be done? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Needing help on mail format...
Oy. Not necessary. Since I havent used Outlook 98 since, well, 98, I can only guess that its grayed out because you are using Word as your email editor. - Original Message - From: "Friese, Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:07 PM Subject: RE: Needing help on mail format... make sure the user has admins rights to the local machine -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Needing help on mail format... I guess you couldn't se that the mailformat box is grayed out??? Why would that be? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Exchange Discussions; MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Needing help on mail format... Outlook 98 NT 4.0 SP4 Good afternoon, I have a user that reports as follows: User is needing to be able to change her TEXT FORMAT from RICH TEXT to PLAIN TEXT when working in OUTLOOK. Please assist. When I go to Tools>>Options>>Mail Format the following screen appears: <<...OLE_Obj...>> As you can see the Send in this message format drop down box is grayed out. Why would this be? Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting both Information Stores?
Misguided logic I think - if I don't need to use does it need to be there was my theory, but playing with the IMS and the event service shows they (appear to) need to be there even if they're empty. regards Paul -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 19:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting both Information Stores? [bcc] Paul: Yes, both of the stores can be deleted, but I have never had to delete them both at the same time. Just out of curiosity, why do you want to delete both stores? Couldn't shutting down the Information Store service accomplish the same thing? (Unless the services you are running depend on the IS?) Thanks, Jim -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Deleting both Information Stores? Subject: Deleting both Information Stores? New 5.5 SP4 server, it's just going to run connectors. I've deleted the Private IS, now I want to remove the Public IS. The Paul Robichaux implies they can both be deleted, but when I try to do so I get the message "You cannot remove the last information store from a server". Any ideas, or can it just not be done? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EventID 1188?
Subject: EventID 1188 From: Paul Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.exchange.admin Gt the following on my server (located in England): Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: General Event ID: 1188 Date: 14/02/2003 Time: 15:16:34 User: N/A Computer: MAIL02 Description: The address template or display template for locale ID 0x809 could not be found, ignoring. Please install language support for that language by importing the appropriate address template from the Microsoft Exchange client CD-ROM. The only thing I can find is this, and it doesn't even appear to be in the MSKB, is it still applicable for Exchange 5.5 SP4 on Windows 2000? MORE INFORMATION To stop this error message from being logged, you can create your own address template for the locale 0x809. To do so: 1. Copy the Support\Tpl\ folder to your hard drive. 2. Remove the read-only attribute from all files. 3. Open the Template.csv file in Notepad. 4. Search for and replace all instances of "409" with "809". 5. Search for and replace all instances of "USA" with "UK". 6. Save the Template.csv file. You have now created the display template for the locale 0x809. To import the localized templates, in the Microsoft Exchange Administrator program, on the Tools menu, click Directory Import. This should bring up the Directory Import page. Click the Template.csv file described above as the Import File, and click OK. This procedure imports all the required templates. After the templates are imported, the localized templates are visible in the Administrator program. Addressing, Details Templates and Addressing, One-Off Address Templates. This error message will appear if English (United Kingdom) is a selected locale. You can view the selected locales on the Locales property page of the Server object in the Exchange Administrator program. NOTE: There are likely to be other locales for which specific address and display templates do not exist. These can be created in similar way. regards Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Needing help on mail format...
make sure the user has admins rights to the local machine -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Needing help on mail format... I guess you couldn't se that the mailformat box is grayed out??? Why would that be? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Exchange Discussions; MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Needing help on mail format... Outlook 98 NT 4.0 SP4 Good afternoon, I have a user that reports as follows: User is needing to be able to change her TEXT FORMAT from RICH TEXT to PLAIN TEXT when working in OUTLOOK. Please assist. When I go to Tools>>Options>>Mail Format the following screen appears: <<...OLE_Obj...>> As you can see the Send in this message format drop down box is grayed out. Why would this be? Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K OWA & timeouts
You might give Q294752 a try. I have to say though, it didn't work for me. I personally like Ed's solution the best. Aaron -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K OWA & timeouts Ken: Are you looking at MessageWare (http://www.messageware.com)? I have not worked with them personally, but I know a couple of folks that have had good things to say about them. Of course, you could always wait for Exchange 2003. :-) Jim -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 6:36 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: E2K OWA & timeouts Subject: E2K OWA & timeouts We are looking for a solution to E2K OWA's lack of a timeout feature. We are currently looking at several options, but I thought I'd ask the list what they are doing? Suggestions? Experiences (good or bad)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting both Information Stores?
Paul: Yes, both of the stores can be deleted, but I have never had to delete them both at the same time. Just out of curiosity, why do you want to delete both stores? Couldn't shutting down the Information Store service accomplish the same thing? (Unless the services you are running depend on the IS?) Thanks, Jim -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:14 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Deleting both Information Stores? Subject: Deleting both Information Stores? New 5.5 SP4 server, it's just going to run connectors. I've deleted the Private IS, now I want to remove the Public IS. The Paul Robichaux implies they can both be deleted, but when I try to do so I get the message "You cannot remove the last information store from a server". Any ideas, or can it just not be done? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Needing help on mail format...
-Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Needing help on mail format... Outlook 98 NT 4.0 SP4 Good afternoon, I have a user that reports as follows: User is needing to be able to change her TEXT FORMAT from RICH TEXT to PLAIN TEXT when working in OUTLOOK. Please assist. When I go to Tools>>Options>>Mail Format the following screen appears: <<...OLE_Obj...>> As you can see the Send in this message format drop down box is grayed out. Why would this be? Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Needing help on mail format...
I guess you couldn't se that the mailformat box is grayed out??? Why would that be? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Exchange Discussions; MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Needing help on mail format... Outlook 98 NT 4.0 SP4 Good afternoon, I have a user that reports as follows: User is needing to be able to change her TEXT FORMAT from RICH TEXT to PLAIN TEXT when working in OUTLOOK. Please assist. When I go to Tools>>Options>>Mail Format the following screen appears: <<...OLE_Obj...>> As you can see the Send in this message format drop down box is grayed out. Why would this be? Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question
Excellent point ... I'm writing my comments to the user survey results. I just added the following: One complaint about Notes and the reply with history feature: attachments remain in the history. This inflates the storage requirements of the server significantly. Also Notes keeps a copy of each message for each recipient and the sender. thus a message with a 100k attachment sent to 99 people requires 10MB of storage space. If each recipient replies once to all with history, the server now needs 1GB of storage space for a simple discussion. Exchange links a single copy of the message to the 99 recipients and sender requiring only 100k to store the initial message while the requirement to hold the replies is practically insignificant. - Original Message - From: "Tony Hlabse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:12 PM Subject: RE: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question > > > > > Talking to a Notes email guy the other day. I mentioned that when he relied > back to me that the attachment was still there. I asked him if that was a > feature of Notes? He said yes another reason his company was switching to > NBotes. Notes always attaches a copy of a attachment. They expect their > storage to go way down. > > > > > > > >"the users will pick" ?? Then they will get what they deserve, with luck. > > > >Sounds like the patients running the asylum. > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Norris Carden > >Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:15 AM > >To: Exchange Discussions > >Subject: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question > > > > > >We're undergoing the internal debate of whether to continue a suspended > >(for a year) implementation of Notes R5 or move to Exchange 2k. I'm not > >trying to start an Exchange vs Notes war, but one of our users asked a > >question I can't answer. Maybe someone else with experience in both > >environments can help. > > > >Notes has an mail option to prevent copying to clipboard, forwarding or > >replying with history (leave it to the head of HR to like this). To my > >knowledge there is nothing similar in Exchange. Is this something MS or > >some third party has done in Exchange 2k or 2003? > > > >Personally I prefer Exchange (esp in an AD environment). Feel free to send > >me any comments that might help the evaluation FROM A USER PERSPECTIVE. > >Unfortunately the users will pick and they don't care about how much > >effort it does or doesn't take to administer and maintain a system. > > > >Thanks, > > > >Norris Carden > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >_ > >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >_ > >List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > >To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blackberry/Cingular down
http://news.com.com/2100-1040-984683.html?tag=fd_top -Original Message- From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blackberry/Cingular down This is just a problem with Blackberrys running on the Cingular network right? We are looking at getting BB's from Nextel and also T-Mobile for the people that travel out of the US. Anyone use BB's from Nextel or T-Mobile? How is the support? Ryan, -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 5:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blackberry/Cingular down Saw a Cingular guy on a pole...he says they can't fix w/o duct tape, and alas, none is to be found -Original Message- From: Bingel, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blackberry/Cingular down According to Cingular, the whole Mobitex network has been up and down all day. There is no ETA, and for some reason, they haven't issued their normal email alerts. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blackberry/Cingular down We are not getting any Blackberry messages in or out of the network right now (this afternoon). I called Aether and they said the problem was not on our end. It sounded like the problem was with Cingular, and he had no idea when it would be fixed. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K OWA & timeouts
Ken: Are you looking at MessageWare (http://www.messageware.com)? I have not worked with them personally, but I know a couple of folks that have had good things to say about them. Of course, you could always wait for Exchange 2003. :-) Jim -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 6:36 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: E2K OWA & timeouts Subject: E2K OWA & timeouts We are looking for a solution to E2K OWA's lack of a timeout feature. We are currently looking at several options, but I thought I'd ask the list what they are doing? Suggestions? Experiences (good or bad)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question
As others have suggested, Notes offers "bull$hit security". There are seldom good techological solutions to behavioral problems. (I got to use that twice today! I need a hotkey for that!) If certain people can't keep a secret, don't share it with them. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Norris Carden Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question We're undergoing the internal debate of whether to continue a suspended (for a year) implementation of Notes R5 or move to Exchange 2k. I'm not trying to start an Exchange vs Notes war, but one of our users asked a question I can't answer. Maybe someone else with experience in both environments can help. Notes has an mail option to prevent copying to clipboard, forwarding or replying with history (leave it to the head of HR to like this). To my knowledge there is nothing similar in Exchange. Is this something MS or some third party has done in Exchange 2k or 2003? Personally I prefer Exchange (esp in an AD environment). Feel free to send me any comments that might help the evaluation FROM A USER PERSPECTIVE. Unfortunately the users will pick and they don't care about how much effort it does or doesn't take to administer and maintain a system. Thanks, Norris Carden [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Needing help on mail format...
Outlook 98 NT 4.0 SP4 Good afternoon, I have a user that reports as follows: User is needing to be able to change her TEXT FORMAT from RICH TEXT to PLAIN TEXT when working in OUTLOOK. Please assist. When I go to Tools>>Options>>Mail Format the following screen appears: <<...OLE_Obj...>> As you can see the Send in this message format drop down box is grayed out. Why would this be? Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question
We already have had "Outlook only" viruses hit through the Notes client. It's just as deadly to the infected machine... and still grabs the user's Outlook Express connection to a personal POP account. I'm not familiar enough with Notes to comment on the security. All I know is both the client and the admin pieces take 3-10 times the amount of effort to do the same thing as I'm accustomed to doing in Exchange/Outlook. Norris - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:59 AM Subject: RE: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question > As others have suggested, Notes offers "bull$hit security". There are > seldom good techological solutions to behavioral problems. (I got to > use that twice today! I need a hotkey for that!) If certain people > can't keep a secret, don't share it with them. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Norris Carden > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:15 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question > > > We're undergoing the internal debate of whether to continue a suspended > (for a year) implementation of Notes R5 or move to Exchange 2k. I'm not > trying to start an Exchange vs Notes war, but one of our users asked a > question I can't answer. Maybe someone else with experience in both > environments can help. > > Notes has an mail option to prevent copying to clipboard, forwarding or > replying with history (leave it to the head of HR to like this). To my > knowledge there is nothing similar in Exchange. Is this something MS or > some third party has done in Exchange 2k or 2003? > > Personally I prefer Exchange (esp in an AD environment). Feel free to > send me any comments that might help the evaluation FROM A USER > PERSPECTIVE. Unfortunately the users will pick and they don't care about > how much effort it does or doesn't take to administer and maintain a > system. > > Thanks, > > Norris Carden > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question
Talking to a Notes email guy the other day. I mentioned that when he relied back to me that the attachment was still there. I asked him if that was a feature of Notes? He said yes another reason his company was switching to NBotes. Notes always attaches a copy of a attachment. They expect their storage to go way down. "the users will pick" ?? Then they will get what they deserve, with luck. Sounds like the patients running the asylum. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Norris Carden Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question We're undergoing the internal debate of whether to continue a suspended (for a year) implementation of Notes R5 or move to Exchange 2k. I'm not trying to start an Exchange vs Notes war, but one of our users asked a question I can't answer. Maybe someone else with experience in both environments can help. Notes has an mail option to prevent copying to clipboard, forwarding or replying with history (leave it to the head of HR to like this). To my knowledge there is nothing similar in Exchange. Is this something MS or some third party has done in Exchange 2k or 2003? Personally I prefer Exchange (esp in an AD environment). Feel free to send me any comments that might help the evaluation FROM A USER PERSPECTIVE. Unfortunately the users will pick and they don't care about how much effort it does or doesn't take to administer and maintain a system. Thanks, Norris Carden [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving Public Folders
Okay... After reading this something popped into my head (no it wasn't a flying floppy disk). See if you have a host table on OLDServ that has a different IP address for NEWServe than what's actually assigned to the new server. I had a directory replication problem inside a site, and after a while finally tracked it down to a host table with a bad IP address. Mail would deliver just fine, but directory replication between serv1 and serv2 didn't happen. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:21 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Moving Public Folders Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders I'm not even sure where to go from here. This was supposed to be easy. I'm simply moving PFs from one server to another in the same site! On both servers all the folders are shown on the right side. However, I'm still receiving Error 3091 in the Event Logs. Anyone know what this error is for? Am I correct in expecting to see equal folder sizes on both servers when I check public folder resources? Do I need to rehome these folders? Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm & Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders Yeah, you have to select them all and click the little arrow button so they show up on the right. (I think, anyway. I don't have a UI to look at just now.) You want them on both servers. Also you should set your Public Folder Affinity so users in one site can view content in the other. They'll always see the hierarchy; affinity allows the content. Base your decision to replicate on what should be local to the other server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders Follow-up to my earlier questions. I did replicate at the server level. Got called back to work as users were complaining that the folders had no data. To answer your question, yes, the servers are in the same site. Under the Instances Tab of OldServ all folders are on the left. Replication Tab is set to always. Both tabs on NewServ are the same. Am I missing something? Q196403 states that "data may not initially be available for some users". It appears to be most users not accessing the data and how long should I expect wait? More than three hours? Going against the Ed Crowley Server Move Method, I've reset all the server's Public Folders back to OldServ. Hopefully by the morning the data will have replicated. In the meantime, I would still highly appreciate any suggestions or comments anyone might have. Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm & Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 11:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders Both servers are in the same site, right? Then you can create replicas (instances) on the properties pages for each folder, or on the properties pages of the Public Information Store on the server to which you want to create replicas. Ed Crowley Technical Consultant Enterprise Microsoft Services Team hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving Public Folders NT 4.0 SP6a SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 First time migrating PFs from one server to another and I'm just not sure what the procedure is. The FAQ states to create replicas on the new server, but do I need to do anything with the Replication Schedule tab? Right now all replication is set to never. I created a test folder and then set it up as a replica, but when I look at the Folder Replication Status tab, I don't see any info in any of the columns except server name which lists both the new and old. I tried setting the Replication Schedule tab to always, but it didn't appear to make a difference. Also, I have over 200 folders nested under about 40 folders which are then under one folder for my site. Can I just set up a replica on the top folder, or do I need to go into the properties for each folder and set it up? Is there a server setting for the entire server? Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm & Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 _ Lis
RE: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question
"the users will pick" ?? Then they will get what they deserve, with luck. Sounds like the patients running the asylum. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Norris Carden Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question We're undergoing the internal debate of whether to continue a suspended (for a year) implementation of Notes R5 or move to Exchange 2k. I'm not trying to start an Exchange vs Notes war, but one of our users asked a question I can't answer. Maybe someone else with experience in both environments can help. Notes has an mail option to prevent copying to clipboard, forwarding or replying with history (leave it to the head of HR to like this). To my knowledge there is nothing similar in Exchange. Is this something MS or some third party has done in Exchange 2k or 2003? Personally I prefer Exchange (esp in an AD environment). Feel free to send me any comments that might help the evaluation FROM A USER PERSPECTIVE. Unfortunately the users will pick and they don't care about how much effort it does or doesn't take to administer and maintain a system. Thanks, Norris Carden [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K OWA & timeouts
Schedule periodic reboots of the client computer in question. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K OWA & timeouts We are looking for a solution to E2K OWA's lack of a timeout feature. We are currently looking at several options, but I thought I'd ask the list what they are doing? Suggestions? Experiences (good or bad)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K OWA & timeouts
Timeout of what? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K OWA & timeouts We are looking for a solution to E2K OWA's lack of a timeout feature. We are currently looking at several options, but I thought I'd ask the list what they are doing? Suggestions? Experiences (good or bad)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mass e-mail removal?
It is common to restrict delivery on mass distribution list ("All
Students" or "All Employees") to carefully designated and trained
gatekeepers. It is common to restrict delivery on workgroup lists to
the list itself. (Hint: Create the list, click Apply, then add the
list to Delivery Restrictions.)
Note that restricting the maximum number of recipients in a message
would keep someone from selecting the contents of the GAL in Outlook and
sending to everyone in one message, but it's not as effective in
Exchange 2000 because of the way lists are expanded. That is, in
Exchange 2000, each recipient in a distribution list counts as a
recipient, whereas in Exchange 5.5, the list counted as one recipient.
Even with this Exchange 2000 limitation, nothing prevented users from
mailing several separate messages, each with a subset of the GAL. This
is explained with the saying, "There are seldom good technological
solutions to behavioral problems." The methods described above will
dissuade the clueless, but won't block the malicious. You must augment
your technological policies with managerial ones.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sandhya Pai
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mass e-mail removal?
In Exchange 5.5 click on distribution list - Select Delivery Restriction
tab and then under reject messages from you can add users or other dist.
Lists. For eg, for all admin and faculty list we add reject messages
from students lists (these are in our system). Or you can add people or
dist. List under accept messages from and only those people will be
allowed to send.
Sandhya
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mass e-mail removal?
Importance: High
Ed,
I will be interested in doing what you just suggested. How can I go
about accomplish it? Thanks Much! Sanjeev.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mass e-mail removal?
Better to restrict who can send to large lists and limit the number of
recipients to which a message can be sent. That alone will limit your
necessity for such a plan.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Foerst, Daniel
P.
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 7:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mass e-mail removal?
Hey all,
A situation receive arose regarding Georgetown University and an
ill-fated mail message being sent out to the entire university community
in error. In summary, someone sent a message out to the entire student
body which contained sensitive data. As a result of this they took their
mail system down for 14 hours (they use Groupwise) and through a script
of sorts that entered each mailbox and
removed the message.
I don't know how many people here face situations like this, but I have
been asked if it is possible to have such a procedure in case something
like that were to ever occur here.
Is there a script/procedure available for doing something like this?
Is it at all possible, I'm sure it is.
Any help would be greatly appreciated! I don't ever want to take my
system down for 14 hours more or less and have to do this by hand should
it ever occur.
For those of you that would like to read the article, here is the link..
http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/02/2003020701t.htm
Thanks!
-dan
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
RE: Still no PF data replication!
Regarding the OAB; you need to change the location for this, not by replicating it to another server, but by changing the location where it is generated. If you are on Exchange 5.5, this is done in the Site Configuration container. Schedule+ free/busy is generated on a local basis by the users, the only time you need to replicate a Sked+ f/b folder is if you want the information on a different site. Check the replication schedule in the INFORMATION STORE default settings, see if it is set to NONE. If it is, you may want to change this. And if all else fails, you can shut down the Information store, Rename PUB.EDB to something like PUB.CHESTY.USMC and restart the Information store process. The folder will be recreated, it will be empty, but any information replicated to other sites will backfill, free busy information will recreate as user clients publish the information and the OAB will regenerate; by default, once per day. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Still no PF data replication! It's been two days and still no data replication. Folders are all there, just nothing in them. I am getting a few 3091 errors in the Event Log that I'm not familiar with: Error 3091 in App log. Error -1026 occurred while processing an incoming replication message. Folder: (3-0004) NON_IPM_SUBTREE\Events Root More info that may be a factor. OldServ is the first server in site. When I went to the instances tab I did a shift-click and moved all folders including OAB and Schedule+ Free Busy. When I look at public folder resources I do see a last access time of today for the Free Busy so I believe it is working OK. When I began this process I created a test folder on OldServ, the went into replicas and set it to NewServ. All of this appeared to work fine. I just want to avoid having to do this for every folder on the server. Again, any help would be appreciated. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm & Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Archive Problem
Mailbox Manager is one option. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Archive Problem What do you recommend for cleaning out old data? Please don't say manually...this is for Execs. Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Archive Problem Sure. Archive is hardly a required feature. I never use it myself. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 7:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Archive Problem Is this a soft error that can be ignored? Error while archiving folder "Inbox" in store "Mailbox - User Name ". Some items could not be copied. They were either moved or deleted, or access was denied. Error while archiving folder "Sent Items" in store "Mailbox - User Name ". Some items could not be copied. They were either moved or deleted, or access was denied. TIA Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question: ES2k on a DC
This is the correct post for this reply. That applies to running Exchange 5.5 on a Windows 2000 domain controller, not Exchange 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Garrish, Robert B. Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question: ES2k on a DC Dear Trevor, In addition, you will experience a port conflict. Active Directory, on the Domain Controller, and Exchange 2000 will both want to use the same port number. I do not remember what the port number is, but I believe that it is the port used for LDAP by Exchange. Rob Garrish Windows NT Engineer Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question: ES2k on a DC There are good and bad reasons to do most anything. The # of mailboxes on a server, by itself, is not all that indicative of hardware requirements for many reasons. However, for what passes for normal requirements in my experience you have way more server than you need so it will probably perform well, all things being equal. You need at least 2 DCs in each domain and in small environments one being an Exchange Server is not unusual. DCs in small shops don't need to be high performance boxes but I would hardware mirror the OS on each. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Trevor Porter Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question: ES2k on a DC Hello All, Two questions in one ... I know that MS discourages the use of ES2k on a domain controller. Why is this? Load? Security? Other? Are there any good articles on this? Also, does anyone have any comments on the below config: I have (and will have) well under 100 mailboxes and am planning on using a Proliant DL380 G3 with 2x2.4 Xeons, 1 GB RAM and two RAID1 36 10k drives for the OS and the logs and three RAID5 36 10k drives for the information stores. Thanks, Trevor _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question: ES2k on a DC
Sorry, replied to the wrong post. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question: ES2k on a DC What applies? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question: ES2k on a DC That applies to running Exchange 5.5 on a Windows 2000 domain controller, not Exchange 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question: ES2k on a DC I wouldn't exactly say they discourage it - they sell Small Business Server that runs Exchange (and SQLServer, and ISA) on a domain controller. If all you will have is one Exchange server, it's not a problem. You will see some strange errors in the event log periodically, but a little research will show that they are expected when everything is running on one server. -Original Message- From: Trevor Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question: ES2k on a DC Hello All, Two questions in one ... I know that MS discourages the use of ES2k on a domain controller. Why is this? Load? Security? Other? Are there any good articles on this? Also, does anyone have any comments on the below config: I have (and will have) well under 100 mailboxes and am planning on using a Proliant DL380 G3 with 2x2.4 Xeons, 1 GB RAM and two RAID1 36 10k drives for the OS and the logs and three RAID5 36 10k drives for the information stores. Thanks, Trevor _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question
The Notes help file makes the following statement: You can prevent recipients from copying a message that you send. This includes copying with the clipboard, forwarding, replying with history, and printing. Note This option is merely a deterrent to copying. Recipients can still use other means to copy the message. Personally, I'd be just as concerned about a screen shot as retyping the message. Thanks, Norris Carden [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.rasquel.com - Original Message - From: "Neil Hobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:25 AM Subject: RE: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question Not that I'm aware of. But how would the Notes feature stop me re-typing the message and sending that? Neil -Original Message- From: Norris Carden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 February 2003 17:15 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question Subject: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question We're undergoing the internal debate of whether to continue a suspended (for a year) implementation of Notes R5 or move to Exchange 2k. I'm not trying to start an Exchange vs Notes war, but one of our users asked a question I can't answer. Maybe someone else with experience in both environments can help. Notes has an mail option to prevent copying to clipboard, forwarding or replying with history (leave it to the head of HR to like this). To my knowledge there is nothing similar in Exchange. Is this something MS or some third party has done in Exchange 2k or 2003? Personally I prefer Exchange (esp in an AD environment). Feel free to send me any comments that might help the evaluation FROM A USER PERSPECTIVE. Unfortunately the users will pick and they don't care about how much effort it does or doesn't take to administer and maintain a system. Thanks, Norris Carden [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question
Not that I'm aware of. But how would the Notes feature stop me re-typing the message and sending that? Neil -Original Message- From: Norris Carden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 February 2003 17:15 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question Subject: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question We're undergoing the internal debate of whether to continue a suspended (for a year) implementation of Notes R5 or move to Exchange 2k. I'm not trying to start an Exchange vs Notes war, but one of our users asked a question I can't answer. Maybe someone else with experience in both environments can help. Notes has an mail option to prevent copying to clipboard, forwarding or replying with history (leave it to the head of HR to like this). To my knowledge there is nothing similar in Exchange. Is this something MS or some third party has done in Exchange 2k or 2003? Personally I prefer Exchange (esp in an AD environment). Feel free to send me any comments that might help the evaluation FROM A USER PERSPECTIVE. Unfortunately the users will pick and they don't care about how much effort it does or doesn't take to administer and maintain a system. Thanks, Norris Carden [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ex2k v. Notes R5 question
We're undergoing the internal debate of whether to continue a suspended (for a year) implementation of Notes R5 or move to Exchange 2k. I'm not trying to start an Exchange vs Notes war, but one of our users asked a question I can't answer. Maybe someone else with experience in both environments can help. Notes has an mail option to prevent copying to clipboard, forwarding or replying with history (leave it to the head of HR to like this). To my knowledge there is nothing similar in Exchange. Is this something MS or some third party has done in Exchange 2k or 2003? Personally I prefer Exchange (esp in an AD environment). Feel free to send me any comments that might help the evaluation FROM A USER PERSPECTIVE. Unfortunately the users will pick and they don't care about how much effort it does or doesn't take to administer and maintain a system. Thanks, Norris Carden [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mass e-mail removal?
In Exchange 5.5 click on distribution list - Select Delivery Restriction tab and then under reject messages from you can add users or other dist. Lists. For eg, for all admin and faculty list we add reject messages from students lists (these are in our system). Or you can add people or dist. List under accept messages from and only those people will be allowed to send. Sandhya -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass e-mail removal? Importance: High Ed, I will be interested in doing what you just suggested. How can I go about accomplish it? Thanks Much! Sanjeev. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass e-mail removal? Better to restrict who can send to large lists and limit the number of recipients to which a message can be sent. That alone will limit your necessity for such a plan. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Foerst, Daniel P. Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mass e-mail removal? Hey all, A situation receive arose regarding Georgetown University and an ill-fated mail message being sent out to the entire university community in error. In summary, someone sent a message out to the entire student body which contained sensitive data. As a result of this they took their mail system down for 14 hours (they use Groupwise) and through a script of sorts that entered each mailbox and removed the message. I don't know how many people here face situations like this, but I have been asked if it is possible to have such a procedure in case something like that were to ever occur here. Is there a script/procedure available for doing something like this? Is it at all possible, I'm sure it is. Any help would be greatly appreciated! I don't ever want to take my system down for 14 hours more or less and have to do this by hand should it ever occur. For those of you that would like to read the article, here is the link.. http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/02/2003020701t.htm Thanks! -dan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2K OWA & timeouts
We are looking for a solution to E2K OWA's lack of a timeout feature. We are currently looking at several options, but I thought I'd ask the list what they are doing? Suggestions? Experiences (good or bad)? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Archive Problem
What do you recommend for cleaning out old data? Please don't say manually...this is for Execs. Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Archive Problem Sure. Archive is hardly a required feature. I never use it myself. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 7:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Archive Problem Is this a soft error that can be ignored? Error while archiving folder "Inbox" in store "Mailbox - User Name ". Some items could not be copied. They were either moved or deleted, or access was denied. Error while archiving folder "Sent Items" in store "Mailbox - User Name ". Some items could not be copied. They were either moved or deleted, or access was denied. TIA Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mass e-mail removal?
Ed, I will be interested in doing what you just suggested. How can I go about accomplish it? Thanks Much! Sanjeev. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass e-mail removal? Better to restrict who can send to large lists and limit the number of recipients to which a message can be sent. That alone will limit your necessity for such a plan. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Foerst, Daniel P. Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mass e-mail removal? Hey all, A situation receive arose regarding Georgetown University and an ill-fated mail message being sent out to the entire university community in error. In summary, someone sent a message out to the entire student body which contained sensitive data. As a result of this they took their mail system down for 14 hours (they use Groupwise) and through a script of sorts that entered each mailbox and removed the message. I don't know how many people here face situations like this, but I have been asked if it is possible to have such a procedure in case something like that were to ever occur here. Is there a script/procedure available for doing something like this? Is it at all possible, I'm sure it is. Any help would be greatly appreciated! I don't ever want to take my system down for 14 hours more or less and have to do this by hand should it ever occur. For those of you that would like to read the article, here is the link.. http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/02/2003020701t.htm Thanks! -dan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question: ES2k on a DC
What applies? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question: ES2k on a DC That applies to running Exchange 5.5 on a Windows 2000 domain controller, not Exchange 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question: ES2k on a DC I wouldn't exactly say they discourage it - they sell Small Business Server that runs Exchange (and SQLServer, and ISA) on a domain controller. If all you will have is one Exchange server, it's not a problem. You will see some strange errors in the event log periodically, but a little research will show that they are expected when everything is running on one server. -Original Message- From: Trevor Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question: ES2k on a DC Hello All, Two questions in one ... I know that MS discourages the use of ES2k on a domain controller. Why is this? Load? Security? Other? Are there any good articles on this? Also, does anyone have any comments on the below config: I have (and will have) well under 100 mailboxes and am planning on using a Proliant DL380 G3 with 2x2.4 Xeons, 1 GB RAM and two RAID1 36 10k drives for the OS and the logs and three RAID5 36 10k drives for the information stores. Thanks, Trevor _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mass e-mail removal?
Better to restrict who can send to large lists and limit the number of recipients to which a message can be sent. That alone will limit your necessity for such a plan. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Foerst, Daniel P. Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mass e-mail removal? Hey all, A situation receive arose regarding Georgetown University and an ill-fated mail message being sent out to the entire university community in error. In summary, someone sent a message out to the entire student body which contained sensitive data. As a result of this they took their mail system down for 14 hours (they use Groupwise) and through a script of sorts that entered each mailbox and removed the message. I don't know how many people here face situations like this, but I have been asked if it is possible to have such a procedure in case something like that were to ever occur here. Is there a script/procedure available for doing something like this? Is it at all possible, I'm sure it is. Any help would be greatly appreciated! I don't ever want to take my system down for 14 hours more or less and have to do this by hand should it ever occur. For those of you that would like to read the article, here is the link.. http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/02/2003020701t.htm Thanks! -dan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Crashed exchange transaction log file partition
In theory, although I have heard claims that this isn't always true, Exchange will write all the transactions still in memory to the database and shut down gracefully. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bennett, Warren Mr 5 SIG CMD Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Crashed exchange transaction log file partition The question came up today "what would happen to the exchange server if the log drives crashed". Assuming that the logs are sitting on a separate set of spindles. I hope to test this in the lab but wondered if anyone had had this happen to them. Warren _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Archive Problem
Sure. Archive is hardly a required feature. I never use it myself. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 7:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Archive Problem Is this a soft error that can be ignored? Error while archiving folder "Inbox" in store "Mailbox - User Name ". Some items could not be copied. They were either moved or deleted, or access was denied. Error while archiving folder "Sent Items" in store "Mailbox - User Name ". Some items could not be copied. They were either moved or deleted, or access was denied. TIA Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: calendar import/export
Manually. You might investigate some of the third-party migration tools like Quest, NetIQ and Aelita. Perhaps one of those automate the process. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Santhosh, H. Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar import/export Hi When I export and import the calendar items we are unable to update the meetings because it looses the associations with attendees Does any one know how to restore the associations in the Calendar Regards Santhosh.H E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving Public Folders
Will do. Thanks for all your help! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders You may be having a replication problem. You might try turning up diagnostic logging. Unfortunately, public folder replication is kind of a black art. You put in the eye of newt, antennae of ant, stir it up and wait for the puff of smoke. Not much information is available here: http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=3091&source= If you think you have everything set up properly, you might want to call PSS. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders I'm not even sure where to go from here. This was supposed to be easy. I'm simply moving PFs from one server to another in the same site! On both servers all the folders are shown on the right side. However, I'm still receiving Error 3091 in the Event Logs. Anyone know what this error is for? Am I correct in expecting to see equal folder sizes on both servers when I check public folder resources? Do I need to rehome these folders? Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm & Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders Yeah, you have to select them all and click the little arrow button so they show up on the right. (I think, anyway. I don't have a UI to look at just now.) You want them on both servers. Also you should set your Public Folder Affinity so users in one site can view content in the other. They'll always see the hierarchy; affinity allows the content. Base your decision to replicate on what should be local to the other server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders Follow-up to my earlier questions. I did replicate at the server level. Got called back to work as users were complaining that the folders had no data. To answer your question, yes, the servers are in the same site. Under the Instances Tab of OldServ all folders are on the left. Replication Tab is set to always. Both tabs on NewServ are the same. Am I missing something? Q196403 states that "data may not initially be available for some users". It appears to be most users not accessing the data and how long should I expect wait? More than three hours? Going against the Ed Crowley Server Move Method, I've reset all the server's Public Folders back to OldServ. Hopefully by the morning the data will have replicated. In the meantime, I would still highly appreciate any suggestions or comments anyone might have. Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm & Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command 29 Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 11:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Public Folders Both servers are in the same site, right? Then you can create replicas (instances) on the properties pages for each folder, or on the properties pages of the Public Information Store on the server to which you want to create replicas. Ed Crowley Technical Consultant Enterprise Microsoft Services Team hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving Public Folders NT 4.0 SP6a SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 First time migrating PFs from one server to another and I'm just not sure what the procedure is. The FAQ states to create replicas on the new server, but do I need to do anything with the Replication Schedule tab? Right now all replication is set to never. I created a test folder and then set it up as a replica, but when I look at the Folder Replication Status tab, I don't see any info in any of the columns except server name which lists both the new and old. I tried setting the Replication Schedule tab to always, but it didn't appear to make a difference. Also, I have over 200 folders nested under about 40 folders which are then under one folder for my site. Can I just set up a replica on the top folder, or do I need to go into the properties for each folder and set it up? Is there a server setting for the entire ser
RE: Mass e-mail removal?
ISScan (search the MS site for "iloveyou" - there is a cleanup utlity published to get rid of this virus but the documentation is applicable for similar tasks) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3ben-us%3b224493 > -Original Message- > From: Foerst, Daniel P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:49 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Mass e-mail removal? > > > Hey all, > > A situation receive arose regarding Georgetown University and an > ill-fated mail message being sent out to the entire > university community > in error. In summary, someone sent a message out to the entire student > body > which contained sensitive data. As a result of this they took > their mail > system down for > 14 hours (they use Groupwise) and through a script of sorts > that entered > each mailbox and > removed the message. > > I don't know how many people here face situations like this, > but I have > been > asked if it is possible to have such a procedure in case > something like > that were > to ever occur here. > > Is there a script/procedure available for doing something like this? > Is it at all possible, I'm sure it is. > Any help would be greatly appreciated! I don't ever want to take my > system down > for 14 hours more or less and have to do this by hand should it ever > occur. > > For those of you that would like to read the article, here is > the link.. > http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/02/2003020701t.htm Thanks! -dan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA2K, Public Folders and Contacts
Not wishing to pollute the Active Directory with data I have absolutely no control of, I would like to use Public folders to allow users to set up shared distribution that contain external contacts. However it seems that when Public Folders conatining are viewed within Outlook Web Access (Exchange 2000 version) the "New Mail to Contact" button is disabled. Is there a way to turn this on, or is this not possible within Outlook Web Access. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mass e-mail removal?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;224493 -Original Message- From: Foerst, Daniel P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2003 15:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mass e-mail removal? Hey all, A situation receive arose regarding Georgetown University and an ill-fated mail message being sent out to the entire university community in error. In summary, someone sent a message out to the entire student body which contained sensitive data. As a result of this they took their mail system down for 14 hours (they use Groupwise) and through a script of sorts that entered each mailbox and removed the message. I don't know how many people here face situations like this, but I have been asked if it is possible to have such a procedure in case something like that were to ever occur here. Is there a script/procedure available for doing something like this? Is it at all possible, I'm sure it is. Any help would be greatly appreciated! I don't ever want to take my system down for 14 hours more or less and have to do this by hand should it ever occur. For those of you that would like to read the article, here is the link.. http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/02/2003020701t.htm Thanks! -dan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify Network Defence Ltd. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. For more information please contact the Network Defence Technical Department on 01925 272001 Network Defence Ltd. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mass e-mail removal?
Hey all, A situation receive arose regarding Georgetown University and an ill-fated mail message being sent out to the entire university community in error. In summary, someone sent a message out to the entire student body which contained sensitive data. As a result of this they took their mail system down for 14 hours (they use Groupwise) and through a script of sorts that entered each mailbox and removed the message. I don't know how many people here face situations like this, but I have been asked if it is possible to have such a procedure in case something like that were to ever occur here. Is there a script/procedure available for doing something like this? Is it at all possible, I'm sure it is. Any help would be greatly appreciated! I don't ever want to take my system down for 14 hours more or less and have to do this by hand should it ever occur. For those of you that would like to read the article, here is the link.. http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/02/2003020701t.htm Thanks! -dan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Crashed exchange transaction log file partition
no place to write logsexchange quits. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bennett, Warren Mr 5 SIG CMD Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Crashed exchange transaction log file partition The question came up today "what would happen to the exchange server if the log drives crashed". Assuming that the logs are sitting on a separate set of spindles. I hope to test this in the lab but wondered if anyone had had this happen to them. Warren _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Crashed exchange transaction log file partition
Think about it logically for a minute. What's in the logs? All changes to the databases since the last full backup. Therefore, its already in the database. You'd lose nothing. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Bennett, Warren Mr 5 SIG CMD > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:13 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Crashed exchange transaction log file partition > > > The question came up today "what would happen to the exchange > server if the > log drives crashed". Assuming that the logs are sitting on a > separate set of > spindles. I hope to test this in the lab but wondered if > anyone had had this > happen to them. > > Warren > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Crashed exchange transaction log file partition
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=195519 Neil -Original Message- From: Bennett, Warren Mr 5 SIG CMD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 14 February 2003 15:13 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Crashed exchange transaction log file partition Subject: Crashed exchange transaction log file partition The question came up today "what would happen to the exchange server if the log drives crashed". Assuming that the logs are sitting on a separate set of spindles. I hope to test this in the lab but wondered if anyone had had this happen to them. Warren _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook Archive Problem
Is this a soft error that can be ignored? Error while archiving folder "Inbox" in store "Mailbox - User Name ". Some items could not be copied. They were either moved or deleted, or access was denied. Error while archiving folder "Sent Items" in store "Mailbox - User Name ". Some items could not be copied. They were either moved or deleted, or access was denied. TIA Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crashed exchange transaction log file partition
The question came up today "what would happen to the exchange server if the log drives crashed". Assuming that the logs are sitting on a separate set of spindles. I hope to test this in the lab but wondered if anyone had had this happen to them. Warren _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Deleting both Information Stores?
New 5.5 SP4 server, it's just going to run connectors. I've deleted the Private IS, now I want to remove the Public IS. The Paul Robichaux implies they can both be deleted, but when I try to do so I get the message "You cannot remove the last information store from a server". Any ideas, or can it just not be done? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blackberry/Cingular down
The problem was on RIM's end - it wasn't specific to Cingular. >From their support site: The BlackBerry Network Notification Team has been advised that a component of the BlackBerry Network has experienced a service interruption. Scope of Customer Impact: All Hong Kong Customers Country: HK Network: GPRS Scope of Customer Impact: All US Customers Country: US Network: GPRS Scope of Customer Impact: All CA Customers Country: CA Network: GPRS Scope of Customer Impact: All US Customers Country: US Network: IDEN Scope of Customer Impact: All North American Customers Country: US Network: Mobitex Scope of Customer Impact: All North American Customers Country: CA Network: Mobitex Scope of Customer Impact: All North American Customers Country: CA Network: DataTAC Scope of Customer Impact: All North American Customers Country: US Network: DataTAC Ticket Number: BB8364 Date of Incident: 2003-02-13 Start Time: 11:02 EST End Time: 14:48 EST Service Duration: This interruption is ongoing and we will update when new information is available. Expected Customer Impact: Some customers may experience lost SRP connections. If this happens, customers may notice delays in receiving messages. It is also possible that messages sent from the BlackBerry may be returned. Returned messages should be resent once the SRP connection has been restored. We are aggressively working to restore service to normal operating levels. Thank you, BlackBerry Network Notification Team -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:37 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Blackberry/Cingular down > > > We are not getting any Blackberry messages in or out of the > network right > now (this afternoon). I called Aether and they said the > problem was not on > our end. It sounded like the problem was with Cingular, and > he had no idea > when it would be fixed. > > Tom > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
copy share permissions
does any one know how to copy the share level permissions to file system level permissions Regards Santhosh.H E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lost Emails after making new user
Hi Ed, I did search for *.ost and *.pst, and then *.*st and then *st* but I found nothing Outlook related. And I did search with "show me hidden files". Then I went into his C:\Documents and Settings\User Name\* and manually checked the folders for anything, just in case it was called something different. There weren't any files that looked like they could contain his 30MB or so of mails/contacts/etc. What happened was this, and I have no idea how it was working: After the mailbox was deleted, the user noticed some kind of error message in Outlook (of course he doesn't remember as this was in December), and choose to work in offline mode. My boss (who deleted the mailbox) nor the user removed the "Exchange services" from his service list in Outlook. He was working in offline mode, had no *ST files, and had no AD User account/Exchange Mailbox. Instead of entering user/domain/password in his Outlook, I hit cancel, and the emails were there. I jsut exported all the data, and then entered Outlook with his user/domain/password to import the data. AW On Friday 14 February 2003 12:47 am, you wrote: > Search his hard drives and network drives for *.pst and *.ost. If you > find nothing, there is likely nothing to be found. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Allison M. > Wittstock > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:26 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Lost Emails after making new user > > > Hi, > > I found an answer but I would still like to know something. > > Where does Windows XP store (by default) PSTs and/or OSTs? > My user had almost nothing in C:\Documents and Settings\User Name\Local > Settings\Programs\Microsoft\Outlook\* > > Somehow the user had been working in Exchange offline-mode, even though > he had > no Exchange account. When he was prompted with the Exchange login info, > he > was just hitting cancel. When I had given the proper login info (after > creating the account), I was getting his empty mailbox folders. > > Since he had no PSTs or OSTs, where is the data? > Before I created his account, the System Manager showed no Mailbox for > him. > After it was created, it showed 1 or 2 items. > > Does XP store this offline info as another file type? I have never > noticed > this on Win2k + Outlook 2k, only this Win XP + Outlook 2k machine. > > Thanks > Allison > > On Thursday 13 February 2003 01:03 pm, you wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This might be confusing, but here is my situation: > > I made a new user and the user logged in and used the mailbox. Since > > he travels around and did not have a VPN connection set up, he did not > > > > want to be an Exchange user, but rather just receive his emails > > through POP3. > > > > The user was deleted, and then I made him a "contact". > > > > He had been a "contact" for some weeks now, and now wants to be a real > > > > Exchange user. I deleted the contact for him, and made him a real > > user (same name and information as when I first made his user account > > some weeks ago). > > > > I went into his Outlook, and under services, I noticed he still had > > the Exchange service as well as the POP3 internet email service. > > > > I closed his Outlook, and re-logged him in. Now, his inbox is empty > > and all of his old mails are gone. On the Exchange server > > System-Manager, I see his mailbox has only a few items. > > > > > > What mistakes did I make? I had no idea he still had the Exchange > > service this whole time, because he was not a real user. His mailbox > > never appeared in the System-manager, yet his mails were obviously > > stored there. From what I could see on the server, he was a contact > > with no Mailbox. I searched his harddrive for both a PST and OST and > > found neither. > > > > How do I get his emails back? > > > > Exchange 2000 SP2 > > Client: Windows XP & Outlook 2000 > > > > Regards, > > Allison > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: KMS
I have not seen any whitepapers from Microsoft or anyone else regarding using KMS. One of the best resources I found was the Exchange 5.0 courseware. Not to "toot my own horn", but I spent an awful lot of time covering the KMS in my Exchange 2000 book (Exchange 2000 Server 24Seven) (http://tinyurl.com/5tk7). Probably a lot more than was really necessary for the typical administrator. Paul Robichaux has just published a new book called Secure Messaging with Microsoft Exchange Server 2000 (http://tinyurl.com/5tk9). Though I don't have a my copy yet (it just came out last week), but I am sure that Paul will cover the subject thoroughly and in a manner that is easy to understand. One of the issues that you will be faced with is "rolling your own" S/MIME certificates (use X.509v3 certs) versus going to a third party and paying by the cert. If you go to a 3rd party, their certificates will be trusted by the rest of the world, but you will pay more. The Comodo Group has got a pretty good solution for managing your own S/MIME certs but using their CA (http://www.comodo.net). Baltimore has got a solution that allows your Windows 2000 Cert Server to be trusted by their root CA, but I don't know how much that solution costs. If you just have a few users that need S/MIME capabilities, I would get them from a 3rd party. HTH, Jim -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:22 PM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: KMS Subject: KMS Dear All, is their any best practice articles on deploying KMS (E2K). Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3 Collection
Tony: A couple of companies have got POP3 connectors for Exchange. Try www.exchangepop3.com, PopCon (http://www.christensen-software.com/popcon.htm), or http://www.popbeamer.com). I believe that Small Business Server has a POP3 connector built in to it. If you want to offload this to a separate machine, GFI's MailEssentials will do this, too. Hope this helps, Jim McBee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Sunday, February 09, 2003 12:45 PM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: POP3 Collection Subject: POP3 Collection Sensitivity: Private Is there any way of getting an Exchange 2000 server to collect pop3 email from other sources and deliver it to specific exchange mailboxes? I mean all automatic from the server... Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
